The Truth About Human Shields
Hamas’s use of its own people as human shields is clear and unambiguous.
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Hamas’s use of its own people as human shields is clear and unambiguous.
The rhetoric of the past month has primed countless Americans to accept bin Laden’s worldview, which is that “the creation of Israel is a crime which must be erased.”
If there is no country in the world that is safe for Jews, the decision of where to live will need to be made on other terms.
We need a unity government, not as an emergency measure, but with the recognition that unity is what will shield us from future emergencies.
In conversations I’ve had and will continue to have about the question of whether to stay or go, a number of factors are at play.
With Israel under attack, we can see plainly where anti-Zionist ideology inevitably leads—the belief that when Israelis die, they had it coming.
On the 30th anniversary of the Oslo Accords, a new book by Gidi Grinstein with Ari Afilalo reveals the bewildering complexities behind the peace process and argues for a future that marries hope with hard realism.
Secular and religious Tel Avivians do not have to be enemies. We could, in fact, lead the way in showing the rest of the country that coexistence is possible.
While Jews generally attend synagogue during the High Holy Days, the reality is that many of them are just not into prayer. How can synagogues reinvent themselves to become more vital all year long?
In the parlance of the Ministry of Transportation’s propaganda, the new light rail in Tel Aviv is “a direct line to the future.”