October 7, 2007 | 9:13 am
Voltaire famously quipped that if God didn’t exist, he would have to be invented. American publishers would enthusiastically agree because God, it turns out, is a consistent moneymaker—especially, these days, for those who want to attack him.
This opinion piece is from today’s LA Times, and it shows how The New Atheists are publishing their attacks in a much more comfortable environment than Voltaire et al, and argues that they’re often blaming the wrong forces for American actions.
The anti-God books have appeared in the wake of two developments: the rise of Islamic fundamentalism overseas and the religious right’s enormous influence on President Bush’s policies here at home. But as responses, the secular jeremiads don’t make a whole lot of sense.
Who, exactly, are they aimed at? Who is the ideal reader of these attacks on belief in God? Not Muslim or Christian fundamentalists, obviously, because one of the engines driving religious fundamentalism today is, precisely, a hostility toward modern science. If anyone thinks that Dawkins’ book, “The God Delusion”—with its “scientific” attempts to refute the existence of God—is going to persuade today’s religious fanatics, here or abroad, to loosen up and enjoy a little MTV, you have to ask yourself just who is “deluded.“ It’s hard to imagine anyone abandoning his faith after reading Harris’ condescending polemic, or the science of Dawkins and Dennett, or Hitchens’ vitriol.
The attacks in the books often don’t make much sense either. For instance, Bush and his gang preach Christian values while lying us into a slaughterhouse overseas, ransacking our public coffers and ignoring social inequities and iniquities at home—and so our heroic anti-religionists attack . . . Christian values. But shouldn’t they be attacking Bush and Co.‘s hypocrisy in betraying Christian values instead?
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 1 Comments — Leave your comment
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
Advertisement
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
God's Blog
God for President
Book Bits
Caption Contest
Jewish genius
Strange science
Who is a Jew?
World of Worship
Advertisements
Parshat Vayigash (Genesis 44:18-47:27): It was brief. Jacob, head of the House of Israel, met with Pharaoh, King of Egypt
What else explains the collective amnesia on display?
I think the books are for closeted atheists to convince them to come out of the closet and start talking about how we’re good, honest, decent, thoughtful, helpful individuals.
I think, by and large, these are books to tell atheists why they shouldn’t be invisible and get along by just pretending to be religious to their family and friends, and hope that nobody asks..
I think they’re also for fence-sitters, to peer into the other options facing the.
I think they’re also for the people who don’t believe in all that religion stuff, but they haven’t had a place where they could read and think deeply about the arguments for WHY it’s okay not to believe it, and what happens to a society where questioning it has become taboo.
-Siamang