Best Of The Web
“Shares of Google parent company Alphabet Inc. were dipping on Monday after the Wall Street Journal reported the company discovered a way for outside companies to potentially tap into Google users’ digital information and decided not to tell the public about it. I have three immediate takeaways:
1) This data privacy glitch is just like Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica scandal, except it isn’t.
2) Google made the wrong decision.
3) Consumers still can’t make informed choices about safeguarding their digital information.
First, the Google discovery concerned the company’s Google+ service, an ill-fated attempt to create a Facebook-like social network inside of Google. According to the Journal, Google discovered that for two to three years ending earlier in 2018, outside companies that could hook their apps into Google+ were able to access some information that friends of Google+ users intended to keep private, including their birth dates and profile photos.
Yes, this is similar to Facebook’s problem with Cambridge Analytica, which appeared to take advantage of loose Facebook rules to gather information on people’s Facebook friends without their overt approval. Google+ is not Facebook, however. The Journal said that in a test in late March, Google found that the software glitch potentially affected about 500,000 Google+ accounts. The company couldn’t determine whether any Google+ information had actually been accessed through this software bug.
That’s a relatively small number of potentially affected people, particularly compared with the scale of Cambridge Analytica. Facebook said the academic working with the firm could have gathered information on up to 87 million people.
But on to point number two: The relatively small scale of the Google+ security hole does not excuse Google’s actions. The company evaluated a set of circumstances, including the public outrage over the Cambridge Analytica scandal at Facebook, and chose not to tell the public about the flaw in Google+. The company did this in full knowledge of the blowback it would face if the Google+ privacy glitch was known, and that makes what Google did completely indefensible. If the company had disclosed the Google+ problem in March, it would have been a big deal but not a crisis. This cover-up, however, makes the Google+ digital-security problem so much worse.”
JJ Best Of The Web
"There's nothing democratic about forcing through a Brexit deal that voters in 2016 probably wouldn't have approved."
" Good negotiators use leverage (something they have, which their adversary wants) to obtain what are called “concessions” (something their adversary has, which they want). The result is what experts call “compromise.”"
"Some Israeli researchers and politicians are critical of a decision by the Hebrew University to teach more classes in English, but administrators believe such a switch is necessary to maintain the institutions status."
"A rumor that the TV show 'Friends' was leaving Netflix almost broke the Internet this week. Why do we love this show so much?"
"The U.S. economy is growing at the fastest pace in five years... So why are Wall Street and some economists suddenly worried about a recession?"
"What if Twitter is mostly a closed ecosystem, relevant only to and within itself? What if its ability to shape the real world is, as they say, greatly exaggerated?"
"Progressives are constantly checking their “white privilege,” but what about ideological privilege? Particularly for women, the prevailing assumption is that you aren’t normal unless you’re a liberal Democrat."
"Whether you want to dip into a novel that evokes Midge Maisel’s New York City or pick up a sparkling history of 1950s comedy, we’ve got some recommendations for you."
"Amid America’s reckoning with sexual harassment and violence, gender inequity, and discrimination, sex education is as fraught as it’s ever been."
"Bimbo Bakeries USA, which produces the Arnold, Sara Lee, Stroehmann and Freihofer brands, to remove certification, says exploring ‘alternative solutions’"
"Changes in colony behaviour due to past events are not the simple sum of ant memories, just as changes in what we remember, and what we say or do, are not a simple set of transformations, neuron by neuron."
"The Harry Potter series is a work of fiction. So, maybe we should just put the witchcraft debate aside and read it from a different perspective... there are a lot of lessons we can learn from the series that we also see in the Torah."