fbpx

Models Leading to Stability in the Middle East are Fast Disappearing

[additional-authors]
June 13, 2013

I wrote a long article about Middle East affairs for the print edition. I hope you read it in full (here, or in the paper). Here's an appetizer:

The crisis is bubbling through the region by way of religious osmosis. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki on June 9 warned of “a storm passing through the region.” Al-Maliki’s Shiite government is facing a Sunni opposition, so he knows what he is talking about as he warns of “a brutal sectarian storm.”

The rhetoric gives an indication of a wider war among Muslims that was ignited at the high temperatures of the reactor core that is the Syrian conflict. Egyptian cleric Sheik Mohammed el-Zoghbi on June 7 called on “young men in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, Kuwait, Jordan, Yemen” to go to Syria to fight. “We must all go to purge Syria of this infidel regime, with its Shiites who came from Iran, southern Lebanon and Iraq,” el-Zoghbi said. Influential Yusuf al-Qaradawi branded Hezbollah — literally, “the party of God” — as the “party of Satan.” The image of Hezbollah’s Hassan Nasrallah, not long ago the most popular leader on the Arab street, is waning. But he was right to declare that the war is now entering “a completely new phase.” 

Also waning is any short-term fantasy about a better Middle East. In recent weeks, the war in Syria went viral and spread through the region, while at the same time, the model for a better region — Turkey — is wracked by protests. In fact, any conceivable model leading to stability and calm is fast disappearing from this area of the world. 

And speaking about Syria, here's an update of our What Americans Really Think about Syria table:

 

The Poll/ question

YouGov, April 30

Reuters, May 1

Pew, April 28

NYT-CBS, April 28

CNN-ORC, May 17-18

FoxNews, May 18-20

Gallup, May 28-29

WSJ, May 30, June 2

Aid to rebels

12% (51% no)

 

 

 

 

 

 

11% (42% humanitarian)

Air strikes

16% (49% no)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sending troops

5% (68% no)

 

 

 

 

 

 

15% (24% no action)

Become involved

 

10% (61% no)

 

24% (62%)

 

23% (68% no)

24% (68% no)

 

If chemicals are used

 

27% (44% no)

45% (31% no)

 

66% (30% not justified)

 

 

 

Were chemicals used?

40% (6% no)

 

 

 

83%

 

 

 

 

 

In the WSJ poll we added, a plurality of respondents supported giving humanitarian aid to the rebels, but only a small number supported “providing the rebels with arms”. We put the “taking military action” question under the “sending troops” rubric, assuming that this is what most Americans imagine when specifics (such as “air strikes”) aren't presented to them in a question about military intervention. As with previous polls it's pretty clear that Americans, at the moment, aren't interested in getting bogged down in the Syrian conflict.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

A Night of Gratitude Honoring Dennis Prager

Latest Articles

The F-Bomb

The term “f-bomb” has become obsolete. The one-time shocker is so common that it’s more of an f-firecracker.

The Reunion

When I reunite with my parents, I imagine it will go something like this.

Declaring Our Independence

If neither of the nation’s two dominant political parties is willing to commit to us, then we are under no obligation to commit to them.

Our New Mayor Has a Genocide Problem

If Raman is serious about making Jewish Angelenos feel safe, it’s time for her to correct the lie of the century. Don’t just do it for the Jews. Do it for the truth.

Rabbi Stan Levy, 1941-2026

His work was to lift-up those in need, support the downtrodden and, particularly, respond with a compassionate heart to the many Holocaust Survivors who lived in the Fairfax District.

A Popular Skewer Recipe

There is a benefit of roasting food on skewers, à la shish kebab. By cutting meat and vegetables into smaller uniform pieces, the marinade coats more and the food cooks evenly.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.