fbpx

August 19, 2024

Summer of Antisemitism Goes Back to School

Antisemitism is headed back to school. The summer recess was well spent, with Middle East faculty militarizing their lesson plans and pro-Hamas coffers re-supplied by Qatar and Iran. Students have been practicing their anti-American, anti-Israel, antisemitic slogans. There are so many to learn nowadays, and being out-of-sync is uncool. Many took time away for intensive flag-burning weekend retreats.

Back-to-school shopping this year includes a wide selection of Kevlar vests and an assortment of paramilitary gadgets and gear. Pepper spray is positively de rigueur. Keffiyeh scarves are being sold at student bookstores, each one embossed with the college’s colors and team mascot. The one for Notre Dame is especially fetching. Go figure: Catholics wearing keffiyehs.

Student activism is now an official major within the Illiberal Arts. Genocide, Post-Colonial, Anti-Racist, Gender, Queer Studies is a mandatory course—even for math majors, although the math, science and engineering curricula are all being re-evaluated for racial bias.

Last year’s nationwide campus turmoil, where the Hamas savages of Gaza were shown more love than college football teams, convinced students, and especially faculty, that college is nothing but a progressive playpen—a laboratory for the undoing of democracy. Twisted notions of academic freedom and “shared governance” means that henceforth, university life will provide a safe haven for bored students demanding advanced credit in socially-acceptable antisemitism.

If you thought last year’s pro-Hamas encampments and building takeovers were bad, in all likelihood, it will get worse. The lesson of last year is that nearly anything can be done in the name of Palestinian liberation. All will be forgiven—no disciplinary measures, no forfeiture of degrees, and surely no jail time.

Antisemitic prodigies have now matriculated to a new level of unabashed Jew-hatred. And no one within the academy seems the least bit interested in putting a stop to it.

Just last week, the president of Columbia University resigned. Three of her deans left their posts over the summer, flagged for text messages that trafficked in antisemitic tropes.

At least Columbia’s president lasted longer than her equally feckless Ivy League sisters from Harvard, Penn and Cornell. Those and other universities are facing civil lawsuits and Title VI civil rights investigations from the Justice Department for failing to safeguard campus life for Jewish students. Hard to fathom, but tuition dollars allowed pro-Hamas protesters to deny Jews access to classes and campus facilities—intimidating and harassing them along the way.

Over the summer, a California federal judge ruled that UCLA had permitted that very thing. The court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting such overt discriminatory treatment, ruling that Jewish faith and Israel’s existence are inextricably linked, invoking the First Amendment’s Free Exercise of Religion Clause.

A federal judge in Boston delivered a similar injunction against Harvard, finding it plausible that Jewish students were afraid to attend classes while the university remained indifferent, holding to the absurd excuse that anti-Jewish activity is protected speech under the First Amendment.

Brown, Columbia and NYU settled similar cases over the summer. But did the caretakers of American colleges learn any lessons from these actions, or are these lawsuits mere nuisances—cheaper to settle with a check than to rein in tenured faculty and temper their own hatred of the Jewish state?

Here’s a shocker: college presidents don’t seem to be motivated by money. Ivy League universities lost hundreds of millions of dollars in endowed alumni support from Jewish donors who were appalled by the antisemitic spectacles at their alma maters. None of the money has been recaptured because the schools have done nothing to assuage their former benefactors.

Indeed, it has all gotten worse.

Student enrollment is down overall across the country. The value of a Bachelor of Arts degree has diminished in this age of groupthink indoctrination. College was supposed to teach open minds how to think, not close those minds with mass-produced dogma.

The value of a Bachelor of Arts degree has diminished in this age of groupthink indoctrination. College was supposed to teach open minds how to think, not close those minds with mass-produced dogma.

And fewer Jews are now registered at Ivy League schools. It’s not clear whether anyone misses them. For diversity purposes, Jews are no longer judged to be a minority class. They are simply privileged white students who should be treated like descendants from the Mayflower—with hostility. Besides, the equity obsessions that exist on campus are satisfied by slowing down the progress that Jews have made in America.

The breakup goes both ways. Ivy League schools have damaged their brand. Given all the antisemitic animus on campus, why would Jews choose them over a top-notch state school offering a full ride?

As for the perpetrators of violence, it is not as though they faced no consequences at all. Job offers were withdrawn from several Wall Street law firms. A doctor was dismissed from NYU Langone Health. Some students were banned from participating in graduation ceremonies. Others had their diplomas withheld.

But Harvard, predictably, was among the first to cave, reinstating the diplomas of 11 of the 13 students who had never formally graduated. The Muslim Law Review editor who took part in a mob that physically harassed a Jewish student is apparently enjoying the benefits of his Harvard law degree. Don’t be surprised if he turns up defending terror organizations.

Campus dining facilities should be interesting this week. “Mean Girls” has nothing on the kind of hate generated against Jews, financed by mischievous mullahs, and carried out largely by Muslims, many on student visas. They, along with some African-Americans and the aggressively genderless, have declared a turf war against Jews.

All of the mayhem is being orchestrated by promiscuous faculty members who are largely responsible for the uptick in Jew-hate, the corruption of curricula, and the teaching of ahistorical falsehoods about the Middle East. The academically lazy have become politically all-powerful.

University leaders would do nearly anything to survive a faculty senate no-confidence vote. Taking charge of their institutions and protecting Jewish students is a far lesser priority.

No one wants to get caught in the whirlwind of all this public antisemitism. Remember what happened in our nation’s capital this summer when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed a joint session of Congress? It was a show-stopper of ugly anti-Americanism, with “Death to America!” chants and the defacement of monuments.

Who would want to lead a university through such madness? So much time is being spent deciding when to call in the police, and how soon can all those Palestinian flags get taken down?

Let’s see how things unfold this week in Chicago at the Democratic National Convention. It is expected to be a coming-out party for angry progressives demanding a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, an embargo on arms sales to Israel, and divestment from companies doing business in Israel.

Kamala Harris may be aiming for the White House, but she will be made to feel like an ordinary college president. She’s just hoping that her party’s convention withstands the political unrest better than have our nation’s campuses.


Thane Rosenbaum is a novelist, essayist, law professor and Distinguished University Professor at Touro University, where he directs the Forum on Life, Culture & Society. He is the legal analyst for CBS News Radio. His most recent book is titled “Saving Free Speech … From Itself,” and his forthcoming book is titled, “Beyond Proportionality: Is Israel Fighting a Just War in Gaza?”

Summer of Antisemitism Goes Back to School Read More »

Dispatches from Chicago: Unmasking the Web of ‘Malign Foreign Influence’ Behind #MarchonDNC

To view all daily dispatches, click here.

CHICAGO – Here in Union Park at the corner of N. Ashland Avenue and W. Washington Street in the city’s West Side, dozens of riled up Americans are descending from a charter bus that has snaked down I-94 South from Grand Rapids, Mich., joining thousands for a 12 p.m. protest, united behind banners attacking U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic National Committee convention anoints her the 2024 presidential nominee.

Fomented by hashtag campaigns like #KillerKamala, #MarchOnTheDNC and #CrashTheParty, these outside agitators aren’t far-right acolytes of former President Donald Trump. These protestors are demanding climate action, abortion rights, protections for transgender individuals and – most emphatically – a “ceasefire” in the war in Gaza.

Media reports from Politico to the Associated Press have already begun to generically cast these protestors simply as “pro-Palestinian demonstrators” or “thousands of activists” who represent  a “progressive” challenge to the Democratic establishment in a passionate fight for social justice and the cause of Palestine. There will be many well-intentioned people in the crowds.

However, in a new investigation that I am leading at the Pearl Project, a nonprofit journalism initiative named for my friend Daniel Pearl, murdered by militants in Pakistan in 2002 for being a Jewish grandson of Israel, I have discovered that these protests are not what they appear. I analyzed 234 organizations listed as “members” and “supporters” of the March on the DNC 2024, and put my findings into a public portal I’m calling the Malign Foreign Influence Index, capturing a dynamic law enforcement officials recognize as a threat to U.S. national security. Their efforts are so well orchestrated they have got press passes, a website and a digital “graphics toolkit,” with “main march hashtags” – #MarchOnDNC2024 #MarchOnDNC #StandWithPalestine #EndUSAidToIsrael – and a list of “others to consider.”

This isn’t a battle between “progressives” and centrists within the Democratic Party. Instead, these protests are the product of a deeply coordinated effort by an alliance of three units – self-described socialist organizations, far-left groups and anti-Israel Palestinian, Arab and Muslim organizations – who represent an insidious dynamic coined malign foreign influence.

Of 234 organizations in my initial analysis, 34 groups openly identify as some form of socialism – from “anti-revisionist Marxist-Leninist” to “Revolutionary Socialist” and even “building toward the creation of a new Communist Party” in the U.S. These groups, with names like “ANSWER,” “Freedom Socialist Party,” “International League of People’s Struggles,” the “New Afrikan Black Panther Party,” “World Workers Party,” “Denver Communists” and Keweenaw Socialists from Michigan, support the dictatorial governments in China, Russia, North Korea and Cuba, and they seek to replace capitalism with socialism in the U.S. and globally.

Another 165 groups are “socialist-adjacent” or pro-socialist, working closely with the openly socialist organizations and nations. For example, the “Korean Friendship Association USA” speaks highly of “Respected Supreme Leader Comrade Kim Jong Un,” the mercurial leader of the communist Workers’ Party of Korea, which the group lauds as “revolutionary.”

Finally, 35 groups are Muslim, Palestinian or Arab, many with sympathies for Hamas, like American Muslims for Palestine, Students for Justice in Palestine, the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights and the U.S. Palestinian Community Network. While innocuous sounding, they seek the destruction of the state of Israel “from the river to the sea” and now depicting Harris as chummy with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The goal of much of these protestors isn’t mere political reform but, as one organizer, the Party for Socialism and Revolution puts it, destruction of “the American state,” which its members call the “Empire.” In traditional proletariat honorifics, they call each other “comrades,” quote from the “Communist Manifesto” by the architect of revolutionary socialism, Karl Marx, and wave red flags rich with the communist symbolism of hammers, sickles and stars.

They are not the old-school activists in the Israeli-Palestinian debate. They are far more radical than the “yippies” who caused chaos in the 1968 Democratic Convention. Democrats would do well to draw serious lines between these protestors and their party. The “activists” certainly do. 

One of their goals is to undermine Harris and the Democratic Party – and interfere in our elections – through protests, media manipulation and social media amplification. 

I call them the myth of the marching millions, as a friend once described the efforts of many social causes to try to outsize their real presence. They aren’t huge in number but they stir up so much noise they feign like they number in the millions. For example, Students Allied for Freedom and Equality at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, made headlines by heckling Harris at a campaign stop in Michigan, yelling, “Kamala! Kamala! You can’t hide! We charge you with genocide!” And this network swarmed the streets in New York City in recent days to protest Harris.

The network’s connection to foreign influence is critical to understand. Many of the groups have direct ties to foreign adversaries, including China, North Korea, Russia and Iran, countries that have long sought to destabilize the U.S. by fomenting civil unrest. 

Last year, the New York Times documented the funding of one of the coalition members – CodePink – by a tech mogul, Neville Roy Singham, living in Shanghai, China, supporting pro-China socialist causes. He is married to CodePink cofounder Jodie Evans, whose sidekick, Medea Benjamin, is a regular fixture at the “pro-Palestinian” protests. 

Another troubling example is the “Hands Off Uhuru Fightback Coalition,” whose leaders face charges in a Tampa court in September for allegedly working with Russian intelligence to interfere in U.S. elections. In a statement that rings true today, Matthew G. Olsen, assistant attorney general in the Justice Department’s National Security Division prosecuting the Uhuru case, said last year, “Russia’s foreign intelligence service allegedly weaponized our First Amendment rights – freedoms Russia denies its own citizens – to divide Americans and interfere in elections in the United States.” Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite, Jr. of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division called it “foreign malign influence.”

These groups are not merely focused on domestic issues; they harbor broader, international ambitions, for which they are willing to “disrupt the DNC,” even if it costs Harris votes – and potentially the presidency. Many of them seek to dismantle the current global order, with a particular focus on the Middle East and the destruction of Israel.

At the heart of this coalition lies a shared animosity towards the Democratic Party and, now, Harris. The Atlanta chapter of the National Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression tells its followers Harris is “funding genocide and ignoring police terror.” “Workers Strike Back” tells Americans to “REJECT the New Warmonger-in-Chief.”

By presenting the protests as “grassroots,” the media has underplayed the powerful forces behind controversial messages, like “HAMAS IS COMING,” during the network’s recent protests in D.C., when the American flag was burnt and replaced by the Palestinian flag. By not dissecting their motives, the media has also given them a powerful bullhorn. These protests are not spontaneous uprisings of concerned citizens. They are carefully orchestrated campaigns designed to subvert U.S. elections and undermine American democracy.

These protestors seek to overthrow the current political order, or as one organizer, “Socialist Action,” says: “Permanent Revolution.” Their demands are absolute, and their tactics are ruthless. Democratic Party leaders must recognize that there is no winning with these groups. Their aim is to tear down what exists and rebuild it in their own intolerant image.

Andrew Fox, a former British military officer who did three tours of duty in Afghanistan, tells me: “These protestors are not just demonstrating; they are fomenting an insurgency designed to destabilize the U.S. and further the interests of foreign actors.”

Democratic Party leaders and Harris would be well served to refuse to be swayed by the loudest voices on the streets, who pledge to “Disrupt the DNC,” as “Workers Strike Back,” supporting “Left Antiwar Independent Candidate” Jill Stein, threatens to do. Firebrand, a self-described “communist organization” and coalition member, has guided its members to avoid playing a game of “lesser evilism” and refuse Harris’s candidacy. 

The fight against disinformation warfare is not easy, but it is necessary. By shining a light on the truth behind the myth of the marching millions, understanding details like who funds protests and rents charter buses to Chicago, we can make wise decisions, not misled by fear and chaos, but rather guided by transparency and facts. 


Asra Q. Nomani is a former Wall Street Journal reporter and the author of a book, “Woke Army: The Red-Green Alliance That Is Undermining America’s Freedom.” She is a founder of the Pearl Project, which is building the Malign Foreign Influence Index, examining the groups fomenting anti-Semitism. She has an MA in international communications, with a speciality in the study of propaganda. She can be reached at asra@asranomani.com and @AsraNomani. 



Dispatches from Chicago: Unmasking the Web of ‘Malign Foreign Influence’ Behind #MarchonDNC Read More »