fbpx

October 24, 2023

Israeli-Druze Woman Discusses Supporting IDF

Sawsan Lala, a member of Israel’s Druze community, is active with “Hmisayaat Hdruzet 19 with Love for the IDF Soldiers,” a volunteer-led organization of Israeli Druze that has been assembling care packages for the Druze reservists who’ve been called to enlist in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) following the Oct. 7 massacre of Israeli civilians. The packages include essential supplies and equipment.

Druze is an officially recognized religion in Israel, as are Judaism, Islam and Christianity. Druze serve in the IDF and hold political positions in the Israeli government.

Lala, who lives in Isfiya, a Druze village in northern Israel, said “Hmisayaat Hdruzet 19” was conceived in 2023 to fight back against Israeli demolition orders in the northern region of Israel. But now, the group is devoting itself to supporting the war effort against Hamas.

“We all came together to contribute in any way we can to the IDF soldiers because in the IDF there are Druze, Jews, Muslims, and Christians even,” Lala told the Journal. “We’ve put our fight against demolition aside for a while, changing our direction to contribute, give and send packages and help as citizens.”

She spoke to the Journal about the different ways Israeli Druze are stepping up at this time.

Jewish Journal: What kind of support is the Druze community providing the IDF?

Sawsan Lala: The relationship with Israel began way before the establishment of the state. It began with Jethro and Moses and continues to this day. We as Druze identify Jethro as our prophet Shuaib.

In the last century, the two minorities suffered from harassment by the same oppressors, which is the Arab nationalist committee. Members of the Druze community were involved in establishing the state of Israel — even before the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, there were Druze casualties defending the Druze villages. Druze have served in the IDF voluntarily since 1948; in 1956, mandatory conscription for the Druze men of the Druze community began. As a result, Druze soldiers have fought and continue to serve in regular and reserve duty in all of Israel’s wars, including this “Operation Iron Swords” war.

In addition to the soldiers, Druze men and women, young and old, came together to contribute and volunteer to deliver packages that contained fresh supplies and equipment to the farthest battalion, on all fronts, because our soldiers and we as citizens are fighting for our homeland. Those who did not enlist for the IDF also volunteered for whatever was needed, including internal security tasks. Also, the organization has hosted in Druze villages a great number of families who were evacuated from the southern region.

JJ: What was the reaction of the Druze to Hamas’ attack on Israel?

SL: In my opinion, it’s not just the Druze — every human being who possesses a bit of humanity would condemn the heinous attack by a bloodthirsty terrorist organization, an organization that unleashed itself for the sole purpose of murdering and massacring civilians only because they are Jews and Israelis. The Druze strongly and vehemently denounced such a cruel attack, an attack that spared no one. Infants, children, women, youths, and elders were butchered, raped, burned and murdered in cold blood in their homes and beds. The victims include many IDF soldiers, including Druze soldiers. Those are monsters that committed acts not even the Nazis did.

We, as Druze, fight and advocate for peace, therefore we are wholeheartedly condemning barbaric, cold-blooded acts of terrorists who have lost their humanity. We are an inseparable part of this country and its people.

JJ: Why is it important to stand with the IDF now?

SL: The Druze are loyal citizens of this country. Every generation of Druze men since Israel’s independence has served and still serves in the IDF, both in regular units and elite combat units. The Druze enlistment rate is over 85%, with most of them serving in combat units. We don’t view this commitment any differently from Jewish or Israeli citizens. We see ourselves as an integral part of the state of Israel. We, as an organization, believe that Israel was forced into this war.

JJ: How many Druze are currently serving in the IDF?

SL: Both in regular service and reserve duty, the enlistment rate was significantly above and beyond. I won’t focus on the numbers, but I’ll mention that for every man who is enlisted and serving now as an IDF soldier, adding the soldiers who were called in reserve duty, there were over 200% who answered the call. Simply put, there were hardly any men left in the villages; they all went to fight for the country. This was, in essence, a war of existence, with all that it implies.

JJ: How concerned are the Druze about a clash in the north with Hezbollah, near where many of the Druze villages are?

SL: The Druze are not worried; we know that our soldiers are heroes, and the IDF is ready and capable of defeating Hezbollah. We believe in the strength of the IDF. We are never afraid, especially when it comes to a just war, and we fight for our home as many Druze villages are within proximity to the border with Lebanon. Those who believe are not afraid.

Israeli-Druze Woman Discusses Supporting IDF Read More »

Hamas Pogromists Posing for Photos

The Hamas tactic of using social media to publicize videos of its atrocities against Jews may seem to be a 21st century innovation. But using cameras to boast about genocide actually has a precedent, in the Holocaust.

Hamas and its supporters have utilized various social media platforms to show off scenes of October 7 pogromists kidnapping, torturing, and sexually assaulting their Israeli victims. In some cases, they have uploaded these gruesome “trophy videos” to the social media accounts of the victims, in order to intensify the suffering of their distraught families. Some of it was livestreamed on Facebook.

The technology is new, but the mindset isn’t.

The Nazis, too, were deeply proud of their mass murder of Jews. But they were concerned that photographs of the atrocities might be used as evidence in war crimes trials later. For some reason, the pogromists from Gaza do not seem to be worried about that.

The Nazis also thought that if evidence of their genocide reached the Free World, the Allies would intervene to rescue the Jews. They needn’t have been concerned about that.

For those reasons, German officials prohibited individuals from photographing the killings. Only officially-assigned photographers were given access to mass killings, so that photos would not reach outside eyes. But some leaked out anyway.

The reason the June 1941 massacre of Jews in German-occupied Kovno, Lithuania, is so well-documented is that German soldiers watching a mob torture and murder Jews took photographs for their own amusement. Some of the photos were duplicated and shared with other soldiers.

Members of Reserve Police Battalion 101, which played a major role in the mass murder process in Poland, often photographed themselves in the act. Sometimes, as the scholar Daniel Goldhagen points out, they used Jews “as playthings for their own satisfaction,” by posing for photos showing them cutting off the beards of Jews, or compelling them to don prayer shawls and cower on the ground. “The photos capture [German] men who look tranquil and happy, and others show them in poses of pride and joy as they undertake their dealings with their Jewish victims,” Goldhagen writes.

Both the photos of the massacre process and the posed humiliations “represented the absolute mastery of the photographed German over the Jew,” Goldhagen notes. It was all “done in front of the camera’s recording eye, ensuring that the victim’s shame would be displayed to people for years to come….This simple act conveyed unequivocally—to the German, to the Jew, to all who watched, contemporaneously or later—the virtually limitless power of the [German] over his victim.”

The photos taken by members of Reserve Police Battalion 101 were “generously shared among the entire battalion,” Goldhagen points out. He cites a battalion member who recalled: “They were laid out hanging on the wall and anyone, as he pleased, could order copies of them.” For Goldhagen, the entire spectacle was reminiscent of “travelers purchasing postcards or asking for duplicates of friends’ snapshots that have captured vistas and scenes from an enjoyable and memorable trip.”

Death camp commandants delighted in assembling photo albums that chronicled their experiences. An album compiled by the SS photographic department in Auschwitz included scenes of Jewish men, women and children being selected for death and lining up for the gas chambers, alongside photos of smiling Nazis and their families. Fifteen such albums were created for the camp’s high-ranking officers.

Prisoners who worked in the photo lab in the Mauthausen camp were ordered to create a similar album. One of the prisoners clandestinely made an extra copy and smuggled it out of Mauthausen to document what was taking place. The album was later used in the war crimes trial of camp commander Ernst Kaltenbrunner—exactly what the Nazis feared would be done with photos of their war against the Jews. Kaltenbrunner was convicted at Nuremberg and hanged.

An album belonging to Treblinka commandant Kurt Franz bore the title “The Good Old Days.” Franz was convicted of war crimes in 1965, but sentenced only to life imprisonment. He was released after serving twenty-eight years.

Among the documents recently released by the Israeli authorities is a recording of a telephone call between a Hamas pogromist and his parents. The murderer tells them excitedly: “Father, look at your phone, I sent you pictures! I killed ten Jews, Dad! I’m in a kibbutz, the blood is on my hands, Father! Mom, I killed ten Jews! Ten Jews with my own hands!” The mother responds, “May Allah save you, my hero.” In the background is the voice of a Jewish woman, desperately crying in pain just before she will become another war trophy in the pogromist’s souvenir collection—perhaps as part of an album of images that he, too, will title “The Good Old Days.”


Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His latest is America and the Holocaust: A Documentary History, published by the Jewish Publication Society & University of Nebraska Press.

Hamas Pogromists Posing for Photos Read More »

Manhattan Beach School District Accused of Labeling Antisemitic Incident “Political Speech”

A student at Manhattan Beach Middle School (MBMS) allegedly taunted four Jewish students about the Hamas terror attack on Israel and the Manhattan Beach Unified School District (MBUSD) allegedly concluded that the student was merely engaging in “political speech.” The district is also accused of asking the families of the four Jewish students to sign a gag order; the district claims that the investigation was handled properly and denied requiring anyone to sign a gag order.

The Journal obtained an email from the Jewish Community Center — Chabad of Beach Cities sent to the community on October 22. It stated, in part: “Four Jewish students at a local school in Manhattan Beach, MBMS (Manhattan Beach Middle School) were recently viciously ‘attacked’ by another student because they are Jewish. The student approached them after Hamas’s attack on Israel and said that ‘revenge is beautiful’ and ‘all Israelis and Jews should be killed’. Other threatening and horrific comments were made by this same student to other Jewish students both in and out of class. Unfortunately, we discovered vicious anti-Israeli/antisemitic social media posts by the student’s father, so we know this hate speech is coming from the student’s home.”

Kelly Ifergan, who has been in contact with one of the families of the Jewish students who were subjected to the verbal assault, and whose daughter used to attend a school in the MBUSD district, told the Journal that the offending student allegedly said that “Hamas’ attack on Israel was” and then “gave a thumbs up, smile-smile” and then said, “revenge is beautiful” three times. The offending student then nudged one of the Jewish students and accused the student of being “part of the same Israeli conspiracy,” Ifergan, the daughter of a Holocaust survivor, alleged.

“These are middle school children,” Ifergan said. “How do they even get that kind of vocabulary?”

The Chabad of Beach Cities’ email added that the district investigated the matter and determined that the “comments were political and not hate speech. They closed the investigation with limited action.” The email states that the district required “the Jewish students and their parents to sign a ‘gag order’ that they will not talk to anyone in the school, out of school or on social media about the incident. This is truly outrageous. They are victimizing the victims and not focusing completely on the perpetrator. The student is still in school and continues to try to intimidate the Jewish students.”

Rabbi Yossi Mintz from the Chabad of Beach Cities told the Journal, “I’m not here to call out the school district — I know them personally, I’m very good friends with them and they’ve done a very good job — but they handled this situation poorly and they’re trying very hard now to fix it up.” Mintz, who said he just spoken with the district before talking to the Journal, accused the district of “trying to change the narrative of the story and I’m not letting them do it … They’re trying to say it was a communication between the kids — they had an interaction — which is false. There were four episodes where a kid was viciously attacked with verbal threats of killing all Israelis and killing all Jews.” The district had concluded that the student’s remarks were “political speech, not hate speech” because the student used the words “Israeli, not Jew,” according to Mintz.

Mintz also argued that the letter the school sent to the Jewish students was effectively a gag order because it told the students “that if they want to come back to continue in school, they have to sign this letter, they will not talk about it in school, out of school as well as if they do it, there will be further consequences.”

The school district “made a mistake by sending this letter,” Mintz said. “It was really a letter they usually do for bullying, but they just put this out, they just wanted to close this up.”

The Journal obtained a copy of the document; it states the students will “have no verbal, physical or social media contact, directly or indirectly” with the offending student and “will not discuss this incident with any other students … I further understand that any contact or continuation of this incident by telling other students will lead to further consequences; this includes direct or indirect contact on campus or cyberactivity.”

Ifergan told the Journal that the term the school used for the letter is a “no contact” order and called it “offensive” because it portrayed the Jewish students as the perpetrators “when that’s clearly not the case.” The offending student’s family has signed the letter, but the families of the Jewish students are refusing to sign it, Ifergan said.

The offending student “is still smirking at these kids,” Mintz alleged. “It tells the world, it tells all the kids over here that it’s okay, you can get away with it, we’ll figure out and make up a plan because we’re afraid to stand up and do anything. Basically that’s what it is: they’re afraid to stand up and call this kid out and throw [the student] out of the district.”

The offending student “is still smirking at these kids. It tells the world, it tells all the kids over here that it’s okay, you can get away with it.” –  Rabbi Yossi Mintz

The district is pushing back against the criticism they’ve been facing on the matter. “We are aware of recent allegations that have circulated regarding inappropriate interactions between students at MBMS surrounding their views on current events in the Middle East,” the district said in an October 23 statement to the Journal. “Unfortunately, much of what is being shared on social media and within the local community is not based in fact. The situation was immediately reported to school officials, and a thorough investigation took place. Student privacy laws preclude divulging specific details of investigatory findings, so we cannot comment on the specifics of the matter. However, please know that appropriate consequences have been administered based on the authority vested in schools under the California Education Code.”

The district also disputed that the “No Contact Contract” was tantamount to a gag order. “These agreements are commonly used in school districts across the country and even in universities,” the statement read. “They ask students to avoid each other and not speak to one another in order to avoid reigniting situations we are trying to resolve. This allows us to ensure that further interactions occur with adult guidance and not when students are in settings where that might not be available. The goal of these agreements is to help protect all students from any future conflicts with one another. Although the school requested that all students who were directly involved in this incident to enter into its standard ‘No Contact Contract,’ no students involved in this situation were required to sign it, nor was a gag order ever administered. Upon review, the District is updating the language of its current ‘No Contact Contract’ in order to eliminate confusion regarding its purpose and intent.”

The district’s statement concluded: “We do not tolerate any form of antisemitism or discrimination, both of which go against everything we stand for. We take pride in our schools as welcoming, safe, and inclusive places. MBUSD has adopted the United Nations definition of Antisemitism, and we have worked in partnership with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to establish all of our schools as No Place for Hate Schools. Any antisemitic speech or action adversely affects our efforts to build a strong and inclusive community and is simply not allowed.”

ADL Los Angeles Regional Director Jeffrey Abrams said in a statement to the Journal, “ADL has received multiple reports of the antisemitic targeting of Jewish students at Manhattan Beach Middle School, and have been in contact with school officials and parents. The allegations are deeply hurtful and jeopardize the safety of the learning environment. We call on MBUSD to conduct a more thorough investigation of these very serious allegations and encourage parents and students to report all incidents to school officials.”

StandWithUs CEO and Co-Founder Roz Rothstein, the daughter of Holocaust survivors, said in a statement to the Journal, “It is shocking to hear about such violent and hateful rhetoric happening in a middle school. The school and school district must take urgent action to ensure a safe learning environment for Jewish students. At the same time, they should use this as a teachable moment by educating all students about the Jewish people and antisemitism.”

This is not the first time that MBUSD has been embroiled in controversies of antisemitism. Ifergan recounted how in December 2021, “there was a rash of swastikas” at MBUSD schools. Another swastika was found in front of a classroom where a Jewish club was held on an MBUSD campus in February 2022. The following March, Ifergan’s daughter and a couple of her friends at a MBUSD school were discussing Passover plans, when another student told them, “I’m German” and that “it’s my job to put you in the showers” and “finish the job,” Ifergan said. The offending student was reprimanded, but ultimately returned to the school and assaulted an Asian student, Ifergan alleged, and the offending student and their family eventually moved elsewhere. The district did not immediately respond to the Journal’s request for comment on these past alleged incidents.

Ifergan, who acted as a spokesperson of sorts for the students’ families in the 2022 incident and successfully got Manhattan Beach to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, has since moved to Florida after receiving hate mail and recently launched a nonprofit to fight antisemitism.

“In every instant, they’d rather it just go away,” Mintz said of the district, adding that he knows each of the district’s board members personally and that the superintendent recently returned from a trip to Israel through the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles. “I work with them,” he said. “We do programs together. They have the most amazing Jewish club at all their schools and they promote it and support it … but in this situation they just did not do it correctly.”

UPDATE: MBUSD Superintendent John Bowes sent out an email to community members on Tuesday that was obtained by the Journal. The email read in part: “While there are inaccuracies in the information circulating, it is clear that there is still work to be done on our campuses to effectively eliminate anti-Semitism. We started that work several years ago, and I am committed to doing more. In addition to meeting with the families impacted by the incident, I am reviewing the practices surrounding the use of our ‘No Contact Contract.’ While the ‘No Contact Contract’ is a standard form, we understand that our times are not standard, and this requires us not to rely on our standard practices. After reevaluation, we have come to realize the letter was not the best tool for this circumstance, and we apologize for using it in this situation – we have learned from this experience and will look to improve our practices in the future.”

Manhattan Beach School District Accused of Labeling Antisemitic Incident “Political Speech” Read More »

UC Davis Prof Threatens “Zionist Journalists”

A UC Davis professor appeared to threaten “Zionist journalists” in an October 10 social media post.

Screenshots of the post on X, formerly known as Twitter, shows a Twitter account purportedly belonging to UC Davis Assistant Professor of American Studies Jemma Decristo stating: “One group of [people] we have easy access to in the US is all these zionist journalists who spread propaganda & misinformation they have houses [with] address, kids in school they can fear their bosses, but they should fear us more.” The post then featured emojis of a knife, axe, and blood drops.

Another post on X that is apparently from Decristo include a post stating “HELL YEAH” in response protesters in Jordan setting fire to the Israeli embassy.

As The Forward has noted, Decristo’s UC Davis page appears to have been taken down. Decristo’s purported X account has also been moved to a private setting.

University Chancellor Gary May issued a statement on Thursday denouncing Decristo’s posts. “I find the comments revolting in every way, and I disagree wholeheartedly with them,” he said. “UC Davis rejects all forms of violence and discrimination, as they are antithetical to the values of our university. We strive to foster a climate of equity and justice built on mutual understanding and respect for all members of the community.” May acknowledged questions as to why Decristo is still employed by the university. “The University of California system has specific procedures for the review of complaints of faculty misconduct consistent with universitywide policies and bylaws,” he explained. “The status of complaints lodged against faculty members are confidential personnel matters, so we are unable to publicly comment on the steps we are taking.

“The public expression of opinions, even those opinions considered controversial or abhorrent, enjoy a high level of protection under the First Amendment,” May continued. “We are carefully reviewing this matter to ensure our response is consistent with universitywide policy and state and federal constitutional protections.”

Hillel at Davis and Sacramento also condemned Decristo’s posts, calling them “violent and hate-filled.” “The idea that anyone on our campus would threaten violence is frightening enough,” they wrote in a statement posted to social media. “That the threats were directed toward the Jewish community — including targeting Jewish ‘kids in school’ — just two weeks after the largest mass murder of Jews since the Holocaust is horrifying. Jewish students and faculty members on our campus were already experiencing fear and grief in the wake of the slaughter by Hamas of more than 1,300 men, women, children, and babies in Israel on October 7. That a member of the UC Davis community in a position of authority would threaten violence against the Jewish community less than two weeks later only serves to surface that trauma again, and compound it.”

Jewish Federation of Sacramento President Barry Broad told ABC10 Sacramento, “Emotions are running high. We understand that. We can’t live in a civilized society where threats of violence are acceptable and there are no consequences for making that.”

StandWithUs CEO and Co-Founder Roz Rothstein, Saidoff Legal Department Yael Lerman and Center for Combating Antisemitism Director Carly Gammill wrote in a Thursday letter to UC Davis that they were “deeply concerned” by Decristo’s post, arguing that it “pointedly singles out Israelis and Jews, both protected nationality and ethnic groups on your campus and calls for physical violence against them.”

They also expressed concern over UC Davis political science lecturer McCage Griffiths, who they allege failed to correct students who “shared patently false information and loudly used language that dehumanized Israeli civilians killed by Hamas” during a discussion on the current Israel-Hamas war. Rothstein, Lerman and Gammill also alleged that Griffiths “refused to call Hamas a terrorist organization, substituting terms like ‘resistance,’ ‘freedom fighters,’ or ‘commandos’ and disproportionately allowed anti-Israel statement more time and fewer interruptions than statements against Hamas, making Jewish and Israeli students feel excluded and unsafe.” He also allegedly argued that terrorism is “ambiguous.” All this resulted in McGriffiths fostering “a hostile learning environment for Jewish and Israeli students,” Rothstein, Lerman and Gammill allege.

Griffiths disputed the allegations in the letter, telling the Journal in an email: “The letter offers a distorted picture of myself and of the discussion that took place in my classroom. Any course on US foreign policy necessarily must address complex and controversial topics, including terrorism and counter-terror policy.  Our conversation recognized the October 7 attacks immediately as acts of terrorism committed by Hamas – and spent additional time analyzing the motivations, ideologies, and media coverage surrounding Hamas and other organizations with similar beliefs, including Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, etc.  Consistent with UC Davis’ principles, I am committed to creating a deep understanding of issues through the free, open, and civil exchange of ideas and to maintaining a climate of equity and justice demonstrated by respect for one another.”

Rothstein, Lerman and Gammill concluded their letter by urging the university to investigate Decristo and Griffiths and take requisite action.

Provost and Executive Vice Chancellor Mary Croughan responded to StandWithUs by saying: “When we receive a complaint that a faculty member has engaged in conduct that may violate the Faculty Code of Conduct, we review the matter in accordance with our established policies and procedures for handling faculty discipline. These processes are confidential personnel matters that we are not permitted to share with the public. I can confirm I will refer this matter to the appropriate campus departments that investigate harassment, discrimination, and faculty conduct, in consultation with legal counsel regarding First Amendment rights.” She added: “UC Davis rejects all forms of violence and discrimination, as they are antithetical to the values of our university. We strive to foster a climate of equity and justice built on mutual understanding and respect for all members of the community. We appreciate your support for our Principles of Community, and I assure you that your concerns have been heard.”

The Journal’s request for comment through the university email address listed in a screenshot of Decristo’s university bio was not returned.

UC Davis Prof Threatens “Zionist Journalists” Read More »

Dave Chappelle Reportedly Accuses Israel of War Crimes During Show, Sparking Audience Walkout

Things got heated during Dave Chappelle’s Thursday comedy show in Boston, as a Wall Street Journal report states that some audience members left after Chappelle accused Israel of “war crimes” and suggested that pro-Palestinian members shouldn’t be losing their jobs.

The Wall Street Journal report, which was sourced with people who attended the show, said that Chappelle did denounce the Hamas terror attack against Israel on October 7 before saying that those who support the Palestinian side of the conflict shouldn’t be losing their jobs. At this point, an audience member reportedly shouted at Chappelle to “shut the f— up,” although The Wrap reported that Redditors who claim to have attended the show suggested that the audience member may have been yelling at some rowdy members of the audience instead.

Regardless, Chappelle thought the audience member was yelling at him, prompting the 50-year-old comedian to launch into an emotional rant criticizing Israel for cutting off water, electricity and fuel from the Gaza Strip and accused the Jewish state of killing innocent civilians and committing war crimes.

Some in the audience began cheering Chappelle and shouted, “Free Palestine!” Others yelled, “What about Hamas?” Ultimately some audience members got up and walked out of the show.

Chappelle also later said in the show that “two wrongs don’t make a right” regarding the Hamas terror attack and Israel’s response, per The Wall Street Journal report.

One person who attended the show said on social media, per The Daily Mail: “The audience was cheering Chappelle on during his tirade. I was sick. We were sick. I turned to my friends and wife and said I think it is time to go. We walked out and met up with many other Jews leaving the show. Never in my life have I felt so unsafe and so fearful of what I was witnessing.”

Chappelle’s spokesperson told The Wall Street Journal that the comedian denied being in Boston on Thursday, although multiple media outlets have noted that the TD Garden’s website listed Chappelle as performing at the venue that night.

Simon Wiesenthal Center Associate Dean and Director of Global Social Action Agenda Rabbi Abraham Cooper denounced Chappelle’s reported remarks. “Dave Chappelle, wrong century,” he said in a statement. “Jews were helpless as they were tortured, raped, and mass murdered during Nazi Holocaust. Not today. Not with Israel dedicated to protecting the Jewish people. Mass murderers of our people, torturers of Jewish infants, rapists, kidnappers, and their enablers are paying for their crimes against humanity. Find it amusing? Hamas and Islamic Jihad aren’t any more!”

It’s not the first time that one of Chappelle’s comedy bits have stoked controversy in the Jewish community. Last year, Chappelle said during a November appearance on “Saturday Night Live” (SNL): “Before I start tonight, I just wanted to read a brief statement that I prepared. I denounce antisemitism in all its forms, and I stand with my friends in the Jewish community. And that, Kanye, is how you buy yourself some time.” He also said during the SNL appearance that there are “a lot of Jews” in Hollywood, and that while it’s delusional to say that Jews run Hollywood, “It’s not a crazy thing to think. But it’s a crazy thing to say out loud in a climate like this.” The Journal’s Ryan Torok interviewed several Jewish comedians about Chappelle’s comments at the time; the responses were mixed.

In 2021, Chappelle also sparked controversy with a shtick about “Space Jews.” “In my movie idea, we find that these aliens are originally from Earth, that they are originally from an ancient civilization that achieved interstellar travel and left the Earth thousands of years ago,” he said in his Netflix special “The Closer.” “Some other planet they go to, and things go terrible for them in the other planet, so they come back to Earth and decide they want to claim the Earth for their very own. It’s a pretty good plotline huh? I call it: ‘Space Jews.’” Chappelle elaborated in his joke that “Space Jews” would focus on a freed slave who perpetuated “the same evil on a person that looks just like him.”

StandWithUs responded to the “Space Jews” joke with a thread on X, formerly known as Twitter, calling Chappelle’s bit “a teachable moment.” “If the joke had been rooted in historical facts, the ‘Space Jews’ would have left because they were forced out by oppressive empires,” StandWithUs wrote in their thread, adding that “Jews were defeated by an oppressive colonial force, gradually scattered across the world, and continued to suffer persecution across Europe and the Middle East… After 1,900 years of life as an oppressed minority, Jews would indeed claim their homeland as their own, and rightfully so.”

UPDATE: Chappelle is now reportedly claiming that he has been “misquoted.”

According to The New York Times, Chappelle said at a Wednesday show in North Carolina, “The other night, I said something about Palestine in Boston and got misquoted all over the world. And I will not repeat what I said.”

An audience member then shouted, “Free Palestine!”, prompting Chappelle to tell the audience member: “Don’t start it up or I’m going to be in the news cycle for another week.” “I understand what’s happening in Israel is a nightmare,” Chappelle said. “What’s happening in Palestine is a nightmare. There’s only two kinds of people in the world: people who love other people and the people that have things to make them afraid to love other people. Pray for everyone in Israel. Pray for everyone in Palestine.”

Dave Chappelle Reportedly Accuses Israel of War Crimes During Show, Sparking Audience Walkout Read More »

Maximum Beth: The Empowering Entrepreneur Embodies Wonder, Wanderlust, and Wanderful Adventures

I am inspired by all that Beth Santos has created. It was an honor to speak to her for my podcast after meeting her in NYC at the Travel and Adventure Show where we were both speakers. Her LinkedIn says that she is disrupting travel for women but I believe she is changing the world for women! You can watch our interview on YouTube, read the transcript below or listen on your favorite podcast platform. Wanderful‘s book club will discuss my new book, BRAVE-ish, on Dec 16, 2023. I hope you will join us and I cannot wait to read her new book, Wander Woman, coming on March 5, 2024. Learn more below about Wanderful, Wanderfest and see you in Utah for Women in Travel Summit in April 12-14 2024.
Another title for this interview was “Maximum Beth: Disrupting Travel for Women, Changing the Wander World Worldwide – A Community Builder’s Journey” If you are traveling in Boston, make sure to eat at her Ula Cafe. Thank you to Beth Santos for making time to share her incredible journey!

Listen or watch our interview on SpotifyApple PodcastsYouTube or your favorite podcast platform

TRANSCRIPT from our interview below: (filmed Sept 28, 2023) Lisa Niver: This is Lisa Niver and I am the author of Brave-ish, One Breakup, Six Continents and Feeling Fearless after Fifty. I am so beyond thrilled and excited to be here today with Beth Santos. Hello Beth. Welcome. Thank you for being here. Beth Santos: Hi. Thanks so much for having me.
Lisa Niver: Oh my goodness. It is. I’ve been researching you and it’s hard to sum you up because you are a force of nature. I appreciate that your social media is called Maximum Beth, because I think you are constantly at maximum capacity, what you’ve accomplished for women. I know you focus on women in travel, but I think that you are really changing women in business and women entrepreneurship for everyone, so thank you. Beth Santos: Aw, I really appreciate that. That’s really sweet. Maximum Beth is what they called me in college, so the name stuck and I like to keep busy. Lisa Niver: One of the things I noticed since you brought up college, let’s start there, is that you have a lot of places that you worked in conjunction. Being in an acapella group is a very specific kind of music where everyone’s piece makes a big difference. You really have to bring everyone along or it doesn’t work.
Beth Santos: Absolutely. That’s an interesting insight. I also did crew in college, which is very similar to that. Everyone works as a team. Everyone has to put in their unique part, and you make something. That’s how I’ve always viewed leadership. Honestly, in running a business, you are salesperson, number one. When I say sales, it doesn’t always mean financial. It also means you have to sell this idea to every single person that works with you, who collaborates with you. Your team has to believe at least close to as passionately as you do about the work that you’re doing. Otherwise, you’re not going to get as far as you want to go. Lisa Niver: I did wonder about that. How did you get involved in crew? It’s a tough sport. 4:30 AM workouts. Beth Santos: It’s funny. My husband now is just like, really? You were an athlete. My current hardcore workout is pulling weeds in my garden. But no, I loved it. I actually did it in high school first. I grew up in coastal New Hampshire and so you would do any kind of workout if you saw the view that I went out with. We would do afternoon workouts when we were kids. It’s just something that I fell in love with. When I went to college, I thought I’m going to keep this going. 4:30 AM Yes, it’s pretty rough. But also there’s a lot of comradery in it, to all be together and to see the sunrise. It was a really magical time in my life. I don’t know if I could do it now, but I loved doing it then. Lisa Niver: I’ve read a lot of research about women CEOs that make a big impact. Most of them come from an athletic team background and understand how to bring people together and what coaching is required. Beth Santos: Yes. I believe that. Absolutely. Lisa Niver: Lisa Niver: You’ve brought together a hundred million women with Wanderful. That is incredible. READ THE FULL INTERVIEW on We Said Go Travel  

Maximum Beth: The Empowering Entrepreneur Embodies Wonder, Wanderlust, and Wanderful Adventures Read More »