fbpx

November 19, 2019

Jewish Groups, Students Criticize GWU Student Senate for Passing ‘Watered Down’ Anti-Semitism Resolution

StandWithUs, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and GW for Israel board members each criticized George Washington University’s (GWU) Student Association (SA) Senate for passing a resolution containing a “watered-down” definition of anti-Semitism on Nov. 18.

The resolution, titled “The Anti-Semitism Condemnation Act,” adopts aspects of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism stating that equating Israel to the Nazis, accusing Jews of dual loyalty to Israel and applying double standards to Israel are anti-Semitic, as is “denying the Jewish people the right to self-determination.” 

It also supports the establishment of a task force to combat anti-Semitism on campus.

However, according to the GW Hatchet student newspaper, the SA Senate removed “clauses that claimed the state of Israel is a ‘racist endeavor’ and that Israel has the right to exist as a Jewish state after students voiced concerns that the resolution did not represent all Jewish students who have differing views on Israel.”

In the Facebook livestream of the meeting, a student argued against the language affirming Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state, saying that the focus should be anti-Semitism on campus.

“I don’t see why the SA needs to affirm a state far away when we have clearly laid out that defining anti-Zionism as anti-Semitism has provided demonstrable harm to Jews on this campus,” she said. “We have been called fake Jews, we have been stalked, we have been harassed, we have been called tokenisms.”

Also during the public comment session, student and Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) member Rebecca Lewis said that JVP “members are often isolated from the Jewish community and have been labeled as anti-Semitic for criticizing Israel,” according to the Hatchet.

 StandWithUs Executive Director of Campus Affairs Rena Nasar said in a statement to the Journal, “It is unacceptable that the SA changed a definition of anti-Semitism supported by the vast majority of the Jewish community. Only those directly affected by anti-Semitism should be the ones to define it. This watered-down condemnation must be followed by concrete action to combat all forms of hatred against Jews on campus, including when it is related to Israel.”

Associate Dean and Director of Global Social Action Agenda at the Simon Wiesenthal Center Rabbi Abraham Cooper told the Journal in a phone interview that had the language regarding Israel’s right to exist not been removed, the resolution would have been “an important step forward for George Washington University in dealing with anti-Semitism.” However, he argued that there shouldn’t be any sympathy given toward those who don’t want to see Israel exist as a Jewish state.

“Every nation has the right to pursue its identity and national destiny except for [Israel]?” Cooper said. “Well, that double-standard obviously is anti-Semitic, even if it’s spouted by a group that has the word ‘Jew’ right there in the title. It’s irrelevant.”

He added that advocating for the end of the Jewish state is “aiding and abetting the goals of Iran, and groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, ISIS and al-Qaeda.”

GW for Israel Vice President Noah Shufutinsky denounced the SA Senate in a Facebook post for removing the language “that specifically addresses how we as students face anti-Semitism on campus through anti-Zionism. You made it clear tonight that appeasing racists and anti-Semites for a sense of belonging is more important than listening to your constituents.”

In a subsequent Facebook post, Shuftinsky shared a statement from GW for Israel Executive Board Member Lizzie Irwin.

“To deny the recognition of the state of Israel but somehow uphold that Jews have the right to self-determination frankly makes no sense and shows inherent anti-Zionism, which in it of itself is anti-Semitism,” the statement read. “By denying the recognition of the Jews’ self-determined land in their ancestral homeland is a textbook definition that was manipulated at tonight’s SA meeting.”

Irwin later added: “As a Jewish student on this campus, condemning anti-Semitism at its fullest means including hate speech against the existence of the physical homeland that binds my people together, not just now, but over a millennia as we have faced genocide, pogroms, and all other exclusionary measures that failed to eradicate the most persecuted minority history has ever known. To not recognize Israel as the only safe haven that Jews have ever known and to disregard it because you do not agree with its contemporary politics shows a privilege I will never be able to wrap my head around.”

Jewish Groups, Students Criticize GWU Student Senate for Passing ‘Watered Down’ Anti-Semitism Resolution Read More »

Nov. 22, 2019

For fullscreen click here.

 

Read our archives here. 

Nov. 22, 2019 Read More »

Vassar College President Says ‘From the River to the Sea’ Chants During Hen Mazzig Speech ‘Crossed the Line Into Anti-Semitism’

Vassar College President Elizabeth Bradley issued a statement on Nov. 18 condemning “from the river to the sea Palestine will be free” chants said during Hen Mazzig’s Nov. 14 speech on campus. 

Vassar Organization Israel Conversations Effectively (VOICE) hosted Mazzig at an event titled “The Indigenous Jews of the Middle East: Forgotten Refugees.” An estimated 25-30 Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) protesters chanted outside of the event for around 10-15 minutes and then eventually left. Mazzig told the Journal that the protesters were so loud he couldn’t speak until the chanting ceased.

Bradley said in her statement that the protesters had violated their pledge not to disrupt the event and the “from the river to the sea” chant “can be understood to be calling for the eradication of the State of Israel and is highly intimidating to Israelis and Jews, and directed it to an Israeli speaker discussing his perspective on Indigenous Jews. In the days following the incident, I have spent time speaking with and learning from students, faculty, alumni, and experts in the field, and I now believe the use of the chant—in this way, directed at this speaker—crossed the line into anti-Semitism. We have begun our adjudication processes, which by federal law are confidential.”

She added: “On this campus, we do not tolerate anti-Semitism, hate speech, or discrimination of any kind. I am grateful that after the fifteen-minute disruption, the invited speaker was able to continue and deliver his presentation to an engaged audience of students, faculty, and administrators.”

Bradley had initially issued a statement on the matter on Nov. 15 saying that the chanting was viewed “by some people with anti-Semitism.” Mazzig told the Journal that Bradley’s Nov. 15 statement was “weak.”

Mazzig praised Bradley’s Nov. 18 statement in a Twitter direct message to the Journal.

“I’m happy that Vassar College’s President took the time to listen to the outrage that many in the Jewish community expressed off and online,” Mazzig wrote. “This is a hopeful step that if combined with taking disciplinary steps against the propagators, I believe will lead to improving the campus environment in Vassar. Admitting a mistake and working to improve the situation is a sign of true leadership that will help create a safe space for Jewish students.”

SJP at Vassar College did not respond to the Journal’s request for comment. They had argued in a Nov. 15 Facebook post that their chanting was merely a way to express support for Palestinians; they also took issue with Bradley calling the chants “potentially anti-Semitic” and “intimidating” in her Nov. 15 statement.

“Fighting against an apartheid state should only intimidate those who have a stake in devaluing Palestinian lives,” SJP at Vassar wrote. “There is ‘no sense of belonging’ on a campus that brings a speaker who promotes racist ideology and has a history of attacking students in SJPs.”

Vassar College President Says ‘From the River to the Sea’ Chants During Hen Mazzig Speech ‘Crossed the Line Into Anti-Semitism’ Read More »

Delegation of Karabakh Survivors Embraced in Los Angeles

This past week has been a whirlwind of experience and emotion. On November 10, I traveled from Baku to Los Angeles for one week, as part of a delegation of survivors and refugees from the Karabakh region of Azerbaijan, which has been under Armenia’s military occupation since 1992-93. Our delegation included Tural Ganjaliyev from the town of Shusha, Gulmammad Mammadov from the district of Lachin, and Jeyhun Alakbarov, a Khojaly Genocide survivor like myself. Each of us survived the invasion of the Karabakh region of Azerbaijan, and have endured the occupation and ethnic cleansing of around 20 percent of Azerbaijan’s sovereign territory, which has been condemned by the international community.

I was a 20-year-old young woman in 1992, when my hometown of Khojaly was invaded, and the “largest massacre in the conflict”, as the Human Rights Watch would later call it, was committed against Azerbaijani residents of Khojaly. So many were shot while fleeing their homes, or by the waiting snipers in the nearby field. I was captured, tortured and humiliated for many never ending days, only later to be traded for gasoline and cigarettes by Armenian soldiers, and have lived as a refugee since then.

After the invasion of his home district of Lachin, Gulmammad lived in a refugee tent camp for 10 years. He did not have any school in his camp. But he did not give up. He studied from the school books provided by UNICEF and got admitted to Azerbaijan’s top university, later winning prestigious scholarships to continue his education in Italy and then at Syracuse University in U.S. that he graduated from with a PhD in Biological Physics. Today he is a professor at ADA University. Gulmammad stands as an example of what a person can overcome and achieve, despite the most painful obstacles.

Tural became a refugee at the age of 12, when he and 40,000 other Azerbaijani residents of his hometown of Shusha were expelled. Last year, Tural was elected Chairman of the Azerbaijani Community of the Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan, representing the hope and sorrow of over 80,000 Azerbaijani refugees from Nagorno-Karabakh, as we continue waiting for justice and peace.

This was not my first visit to Los Angeles, and although I have only visited once before, the warmth and welcome I have experienced each time has made the city feel like a second home to me. During our visit, we visited key leaders from American Jewish Committee, the Los Angeles Interfaith Council, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Pakistani and Turkish communities, and the Islamic Society of Orange County, and met with Rabbi David Wolpe, a great friend of Azerbaijan, and other leaders of Sinai Temple. We also met with Liebe Geft, Director of the Museum of Tolerance, who led us on a special tour, and with Michelle Gold, Chair of the Board of the Los Angeles Museum of the Holocaust, and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor, who also led our tour. We were honored to visit the home of Holocaust survivor and Israeli Defense Forces hero Joshua Kaufman, who survived several Nazi concentration camps and fought in two of the most pivotal wars in Israel. These meetings with scholars and survivors of the Holocaust are no coincidence – we have developed a strong bond with those who honor and remember the Shoah, and have learned immense lessons about survival, remembrance, and the power of “Never Again” from these amazing individuals and communities. We have also experienced tremendous compassion, solidarity and kindness from those who know the meaning of our suffering – we are from different times and countries, and obviously vastly different tragedies, yet we understand the commonality of experiencing human brutality, and we share the same unstoppable vision and hope for peace.

Perhaps the most meaningful component of our visit was a special program hosted at the Nessah Synagogue, one of the largest synagogues in the U.S. and one of the most beautiful Jewish temples I have ever seen. Our program included videos explaining the ongoing occupation and destruction, and each of us had the chance to share our testimony of survival. We saw pictures of Tural’s home and schools he attended, before and after as they lay in rubble, and we shared our commitment, and the promise of our nation, to find a peaceful solution and an end to the occupation, and a day when we can all return to our homes. At the start of the program, the national anthems of the United States, Israel and Azerbaijan were all sung, to a glowing crowd of 400 attendees in the stunning main sanctuary of Nessah. The Consul General of Azerbaijan, Nasimi Aghayev, offered remarks on the future of peace and progress, and powerfully recognized a special guest in the audience, Joshua Kaufman, the survivor we had met with earlier that day. Following the presentations, we all shared a festive Kosher meal, accompanied by live Azerbaijani music, and the room was overwhelmed with an energy of togetherness and happiness.

At a certain point during the height of our festive meal, Joshua Kaufman asked the band to switch to Jewish music, to which they happily obliged. Moments later, I found myself dancing arm in arm with Joshua, to Hava Nagila and Am Yisrael Chai.

I was immeasurably inspired, by the support, compassion, and promise for the future I had experienced so far. I was inspired by the solidarity we share with the Jewish community of Los Angeles, who have treated our delegation with the love and kindness unique to this amazing community, a community I feel very much a part of. I was inspired by what we are all capable of, what we have survived, of our bravery and our good hearts. Now that I am back home in Baku, I can still feel the energy of this week, and how it has fueled me to continue my work, as a survivor and as a spokesperson for peace.

Delegation of Karabakh Survivors Embraced in Los Angeles Read More »

Progressive Zionists of California Hold Rally Against Anti-Semitism at CA Dem Convention

The Progressive Zionists of California (PZC) held a rally protesting anti-Semitism in front of the California Democratic Party convention at the Long Beach Convention and Entertainment Center on Nov. 16.

Around 74 people attended the rally to hear speakers including State Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel (D-San Fernando Valley), vice chair of the California Legislative Jewish Caucus. “I am proud to be Jewish, I am proud to be progressive and I’m not going to let anybody make me choose between those two identities,” Gabriel said, adding that the Jewish community is committed to fighting for social justice.

“We are going to stand up and fight for the values that our community holds dear, and we are going to make sure that no amount of anti-Semitism is going to push us out of any space,” he said.

Los Angeles City Controller Ron Galperin told attendees that the United States has a history of welcoming Jews, including his father, a Holocaust survivor from Romania. However, he said anti-Semitism is now “rearing its ugly head yet again.” He urged attendees “to speak up when we hear anti-Semitism or anti-Semitic tropes, be they from the right or even from within our own party.”

State Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) warned attendees of an amendment to the state party’s platform that would face a vote on Nov. 17 calling for the Palestinian Right of Return to Israel. (The amendment failed with around 75% of delegates voting against it).

“It advocates to not have a two state solution, but to have a one state solution that is not the state of Israel,” Wiener said. “This advocates for the liquidation and destruction of the state of Israel. We have to be explicit on what this is: anti-Semitism.”

“When we look at the rise of white nationalism and neo-Nazism in this country, we can’t take anything for granted. We need the state of Israel to continue to exist.” —  Sen. Scott Wiener

Wiener argued that the existence of Israel is important to the Jewish community because, “When we look at the rise of white nationalism and neo-Nazism in this country, we can’t take anything for granted. We need the state of Israel to continue to exist.”

American Jewish Committee (AJC) San Francisco Associate Director Eran Hazary highlighted results from the AJC’s October survey on anti-Semitism, including that 9 in 10 American Jews think anti-Semitism is a problem in 2019; nearly a third of American Jews avoid wearing religious clothing in public; and a third of American Jewish students said they experienced anti-Semitism on a college campus.

“This is an epidemic and it calls for each of us to be vigilant in rooting out anti-Semitism where we see it,” Hazary said. “But also, it’s a cause for us to be introspective. It’s not enough to just call out anti-Semitism where it happens. We have to change the culture. We have to change the climate that feeds it.”

He also noted that most American Jews view the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement as anti-Semitic. “Statements such as ‘Zionism is evil’ or ‘Israel has no right to exist’ have no place in a pluralistic society,” Hazary said.

Other speakers at the rally included Democratic Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, California Democratic Party delegate Amy Wiwuga, AJC Los Angeles Assistant Director and Jews Indigenous to the Middle East and North Africa board member Siamak Kordestani, Democrats for Israel Los Angeles Chairman Andrew Lachman, Jewish Federation and Family Services Rose Project Director Lisa Armony, California Young Democrats Jewish Caucus Chair Rachel Bracker, Anti-Defamation League board member Rabbi Stephen Einstein, PZC founding member Andrea Beth Damsky and Dr. Michael Harris, author of the 2015 book “Winning a Debate with an Israel Hater: How to Challenge Anti-Israel Extremists In Your Neighborhood.”

Progressive Zionists of California Hold Rally Against Anti-Semitism at CA Dem Convention Read More »

Gantz and Netanyahu to Meet Night Before Deadline in Final Attempt to Form Government

JERUSALEM (JTA) — With a third election looming in less than a year, Blue and White leader Benny Gantz and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are taking an 11th-hour shot at forming a unity government in Israel.

The meeting will take place at 10 p.m. Tuesday, a day before Gantz’s mandate to form a government runs out. If Gantz cannot form a government by midnight Wednesday, lawmakers have 21 days to recommend someone else to form a government or could decide to call for new elections.

Gantz will meet two hours earlier with Avigdor Liberman, head of the Yisrael Beiteinu party. Liberman has been holding out for a secular unity government comprised of his party, Netanyahu’s Likud and Blue and White.

Netanyahu and Liberman spoke earlier Tuesday, characterizing their meeting in a joint statement as “positive and substantive.”

Netanyahu had failed to form a government coalition in the wake of elections in September, as well as in April.

If Gantz and Netanyahu fail to form a coalition, Gantz could choose to form a minority government with support from the outside by the Arab List of predominately Arab parties.

Netanyahu at a rally on Sunday night warned against a “dangerous minority government that is reliant on terror supporters,” referring to the Arab List. Arab List head Ayman Odeh accused Netanyahu of trying to foment a “civil war.”

Gantz and Netanyahu to Meet Night Before Deadline in Final Attempt to Form Government Read More »

Sacha Baron Cohen to be Honored by ADL for His ‘Vision, Imagination and Creativity’

(JTA) — Sacha Baron Cohen will be honored by the Anti-Defamation League for his “vision, imagination and creativity.”

Cohen, who most recently portrayed the late Israeli spy Eli Cohen in a Netflix series, will receive the International Leadership Award during the civil rights organization’s Never is Now Summit on anti-Semitism and hate. The summit will be held on Thursday in New York City.

The actor, comedian and director, whose political satire films include “Borat” and “The Dictator,” will deliver a keynote address.

“Baron Cohen has used humor and satire to expose people’s inherent biases by depicting racists, anti-Semites, neo-Nazis, Islamophobes and others as deeply flawed, ordinary people whose prejudices are, ultimately, laughable,” the ADL said in a statement. “As a celebrity and public figure, he’s not shied away from taking on tough subjects off-screen, having recently spoken out about the failure of social media companies to adequately address the rampant racism, anti-Semitism and hate on their platforms.”

ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said in the statement that Cohen’s characters “help to expose how common prejudices are in our society and our world.”

“There’s many ways to combat prejudice, and anti-bias education, exposure and awareness are important tools. But there are other, more unorthodox ways to fight hate,” Greenblatt said. “Sacha’s hilarious characters fall into that latter category. They push envelopes. They cross boundaries. They evoke stereotypes and tropes, but for comedic effect.”

Sacha Baron Cohen to be Honored by ADL for His ‘Vision, Imagination and Creativity’ Read More »

A Moment of Pride

I didn’t think I was addicted to junk food, but as David Suissa has pointed out, the news has become the new Dorito or for me, a distasteful flavored potato chip; bitter, nasty, shameful, revengeful, and oh so indecent. For those of us who try to live the Jewish values of integrity, truth, and righteousness, it is almost impossible to not react and be mesmerized by the overwhelming cultural standards Mr. Trump enacts on a moment to moment basis, supported by paid officials – Republican House members and Senators, themselves seemingly hypnotized by distortion and lies, like a member of a cult. It’s astonishing to watch while being enveloped in the eye of this hurricane that constantly swirls around us, holding us in its destructive force. I hope that such misplaced loyalty will come back to haunt them.

Yet, for a moment, on Friday, Nov. 15, I felt pride and joy as I watched an intelligent, honorable, prideful, and honest woman face the world, despite her fear, to tell her story. Thirty-three years of dedicated service to our country, including terrifying situations where her physical being was most importantly the president (small ‘p’ on purpose). Confidently she owned her vast experience and skill, asking a simple question. “Why did the president have to smear her, when he could have just told her to leave her position?” Of course, not one Republican was willing to answer this simple question. Restating over and over again that the president had the power and position to choose whoever he wished to serve him, something she herself acknowledged, not one of them would address her simple query. 

How many times have we been reminded that Judaism abhors shaming someone in public, as Talmud describes (San 107a) it is if ones’’ face literally loses its color, turning white Ambassador Yovanovitch herself explained, after reading the letter dismissing her and hearing of the smear campaign, that witnesses observed the color of her face drained away. With Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) often passed to future generations from those who suffered the trauma from either Nazi and Communist regimes, it isn’t hard to empathize with this Diplomat and her response to being abused verbally and subtly (perhaps not so subtly) threatened. As she said, “I felt intimidated.” To read, “that things could happen to her,” felt, ominously, not so good. Being beautiful, talented, skilled and most importantly respected must have been quite threatening to Mr. Trump. The best he could do was, smear her reputation. How sad is that.

Marie Yovanovitch is a hero to me. So are the many public servants who are willing to defy White House orders and come forward to tell the truth, something alien to this administration. It is heartening to know, and witness, that America still has legs to stand on. Whether politically correct or not, impeachment is what this president deserves. His arrogance and hubris must be responded to. 

As Thanksgiving approaches we must hearken back to the courage and risk-taking of those who left countries where leaders like Trump believed they were above the law and could do whatever they wished at the expense of their peoples’ freedom and safety. These mavericks led the way to the creation of this country, which embraced freedom and the pursuit of happiness for any and all. 

Thank you, Marie Yovanovich, for being a woman of courage and integrity and role modeling for all, young and old, what it means to be honest, courageous and live with dignity.

Rabbi and Cantor Eva Robbins

A Moment of Pride Read More »

Pompeo’s Settlement Statement: Facts on the Ground

The Bluff

Note the double negative in the statement by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo: “The establishment of Israeli civilian settlements in the West Bank is not, per se, inconsistent with international law.” Pompeo didn’t say that establishing settlements is consistent with international law. He said it is not inconsistent. And, more importantly, he said it does not matter — that is, international law does not matter. In fact, I’d argue that his most important observation was the following sentence: “The hard truth is that there will never be a judicial resolution to the conflict, and arguments about who is right and who is wrong as a matter of international law will not bring peace.”

Are settlements illegal? Thoughtful people can have a sincere debate about that.

Can there be a judicial resolution to the conflict? There can be no serious debate about that. 

This means that Pompeo’s most important observation is plainly true. International law has no practical meaning in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (and one could legitimately wonder if it has any meaning anywhere). Inserting it into the conversation is a disruption. Inserting it into the conversation is a manipulation. It is a tactic aimed at presenting Israel as a pariah state, a state guilty of criminality. 

We should thank Pompeo and President Donald Trump’s administration calling this bluff. 

The Settlements

When Pompeo said that settlements weren’t illegal, he didn’t say that they weren’t damaging to the goal of peace. He didn’t say they weren’t ill-advised. This is less of a statement about the settlements than it is about the role and the limitations of international law. 

The settlements are a separate issue. As Pompeo said, they create new realities on the ground. They create realities that some people see as disastrous. True, international law is irrelevant in discussing the settlements. And yet, we need to discuss the settlements, the strategy behind them, their advantages and disadvantages. We still need to discuss an area in which millions live under Israel’s control without having full political rights. We still need to consider the options for Israel as it moves forward, mixing settlers and Palestinians in ways that could make separation complicated if not impossible. 

The Timing

A few days ago, the European Union’s top court ruled that European countries must label products made in Israeli settlements. Pompeo’s declaration is a clear and immediate rebuff of this unwise decision by the court. Again, it is calling a bluff: This is not a judicial decision based on law. It is a political decision expressing Europe’s opposition to settlement activity.

So the timing is important but Israel still will have to deal with a European Union — its largest business partner — whose policy is to use international law as a justification for labeling products made by Jews who live in a disputed area. 

Timing is also important because Israel is in the midst of a nutty political process. And Pompeo’s statement — on the heels of last week’s Gaza eruption — make a coalition supported by the Arab Party seem less viable. The leader of the Blue and White Party, Benny Gantz, responded favorably to the U.S. policy change. The leaders of the Arab bloc are furious. In other words, Pompeo added another wedge to the many wedges that separate Gantz and the Arabs, and make a coalition headed by him and supported by them  seem unrealistic (if not impossible).

The Response

Europe disagrees with the Trump administration. This was to be expected. 

The Palestinians are unhappy. That’s natural. 

Most Jewish organizations meekly support the statement (AIPAC) or strongly oppose it (the Reform movement). Unfortunate but predictable. 

Democratic presidential candidates disagree with the Trump administration. “The Trump administration’s statement on West Bank settlements is not only a significant step backward in our efforts to achieve a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it is the latest in a pattern of destructive decisions that harm our national interests,” Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg said. That’s important because of simple truth: The Trump administration altered a position that can be reversed. In other words, if Bernie Sanders or Joe Biden or Elizabeth Warren or Buttigieg enter the Oval Office, they can easily return to the “settlements are illegal” policy. 

And yet, unlike statements, some facts on the ground are not easy to undo. When the American Embassy was moved to Jerusalem, Democratic candidates were unhappy but it’s unlikely that any of them would attempt to move the embassy back to Tel Aviv. With settlement activity, they will have similar problem: What Israel decides to build under a Trump umbrella will add “facts on the ground” to the statement. Reversing the statement will be possible, evacuating these settlements much more difficult.


Shmuel Rosner is senior political editor. For more analysis of Israeli and international politics, visit Rosner’s Domain.

Pompeo’s Settlement Statement: Facts on the Ground Read More »