fbpx

November 16, 2016

ARZA joins Reform Movement Partners in Deep Concern about Steve Bannon and 2 State Solution

The Association of Reform Zionists of America (ARZA) is alarmed at the appointment of Steve Bannon as an advisor and strategist to President-elect Trump. Mr. Bannon led the premier website of the ‘alt-right’ — a loose-knit group of white nationalists and unabashed anti-Semites and racists, a true affront to our open, pluralistic society.

As the Zionist organization representing the Reform Movement’s 1.5 million American Jews, we rarely engage in American politics, yet this situation demands our voice:

The strong America-Israel relationship is of the utmost importance to us, and we express our deep concern that President-elect Trump may set aside the policy of every previous American President who supported a two states for two peoples resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

We are deeply concerned that since the election of Donald Trump, several Israeli ministers in the Knesset have openly considered this as an opportunity to forgo the establishment of a Palestinian State. Evidence of this trend can be seen not only in the public discourse of various ministers but also in their actions. A bill to retroactively legalize illegal settlements just passed its first Knesset reading today.

We worry that President-elect Trump will support those forces within Israel that seek a “one-state solution” which would destroy a Jewish and democratic Israel.  It is both our fervent hope and expectation that Mr. Trump will quickly and definitively express his administration’s full support for a two-state solution and continue efforts to ensure a safe, secure Jewish State of Israel living in peace with a neighboring Palestinian State.


 

Temple Israel of Hollywood joins with the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism Calls on all to Take Action

Take Action – Click below to join with Reform Jews across the country letting President-Elect Trump know that we reject the appointment of Steve Bannon as White House Chief Strategist and Senior Counselor.  Mr. Bannon was responsible for the advancement of ideologies antithetical to our nation, including anti-Semitism, misogyny, racism and Islamophobia. There should be no place for such views in the White House. It is essential that President-Elect Trump assemble a leadership team that reflects his stated aspiration

http://action.rac.org/p/dia/action3/common/public/?action_KEY=23807

ARZA joins Reform Movement Partners in Deep Concern about Steve Bannon and 2 State Solution Read More »

The new political reality: Jews encounter Donald Trump

We are living in the aftermath of a 21st-century election that divided this nation by class, ethnicity, geography and culture. The social, political and economic divisions that separate rural and working-class voters from urban, college-educated Americans framed this country’s voting patterns last week, and the results created a political tsunami that profoundly impacted the Jewish community, just as it buffeted other constituencies on the left and within the right.

The population demographics of our nation are changing, as reflected in the statistics about those who voted. A census report affirms that by 2050, the United States will cease to be a majority Caucasian society. In response to these changing realities, the candidates constructed two distinctive visions of America, each appealing to different voting constituencies: one that asked us to return to an earlier moment of American greatness while the other celebrated the contemporary scenario with its possibilities and promises. Donald Trump’s worldview is bound up with his focus on national protectionism, placing limitations on immigration and trade agreements. A Hillary Clinton-inspired America would have promoted her globalist instincts where human rights, trade and immigration were key ingredients.

Donald Trump was not the candidate of choice for our community. A New York Times exit poll found that 71 percent of Jews supported Hillary Clinton compared with 24 percent who embraced Donald Trump. Probably for the first time in American-Jewish history, a number of Jews did not exercise their right to vote. Some millennial voters, unhappy because Bernie Sanders wasn’t on the ticket, decided not to participate. A group of Jewish Republicans and independents opted out, expressing their disappointment with both major-party nominees. After each election cycle, Jews take a DNA sample measuring their political pulse. In this scenario, Jewish financial clout seemed to outweigh our community’s voting heft as our numbers appear to be declining as part of a changing demographic reality.

At this moment, we have no ability to unpack the intentions of the president-elect, as Trump defies basic labels, adding to our confusion when trying to define his leadership. The question remains: What type of America is likely to emerge under a Trump presidency? A key indicator certainly may be provided in his cabinet selections and through the appointment of key advisers. 

We know Republicans will define the future of this nation, but the question remains which sector of that party will gain traction in shaping the president’s vision and priorities: the evangelical base, the Tea Party crowd or fiscal conservatives? Despite the fact that neo-conservatives, a predominantly influential Jewish constituency, did not embrace Trump’s candidacy, will they nonetheless be able to play a role in constructing the president’s foreign policy priorities?

The Jewish community for decades has sought to protect and expand the social policy firewall, composed of such issues as health care reform, immigration, civil liberties and economic justice. The challenge now will be to defend these core areas against efforts to modify or alter policies or downsize the social welfare basket of services. Jewish organizations have crafted policies on gun violence, the environment and church-state separation among other public policy priorities. Neither the Republican Party platform nor Trump’s campaign statements in connection with these issues offers little by way of common agreement with our community’s positions. 

The balance of power on the Supreme Court is an area of primary concern to the Jewish community. The gains secured over the past half-century in civil liberties, abortion rights, criminal reforms and marriage equality are likely to be revisited as conservative court appointees will endeavor to roll back existing positions. This could be the primary battleground arena for American Jews.

In the aftermath of this election, we are likely to experience a fundamental social and cultural revolution unfolding in connection with how the new administration and its Republican congressional allies set out to define and shape their American story. This president’s legacy is going to be determined by the character of our relationships with one another. Through the president’s messages and policy proposals, will a Trump administration seek to divide and separate constituencies from one another or will the new president take advantage of the opportunity to build bridges across class and race? From the outset, one would hope that Trump would repudiate his political supporters who embraced messages of hate directed against an array of nationalities, religions and ethnic communities. It would be instructive if the president-elect would step back from some of his campaign rhetoric, seeking to reach out to some of those he personally offended.

The newly minted president-elect has acquired over the years, in business and through his civic undertakings, a broad swath of Jewish connections. Within his own family and as part of his campaign team, his Jewish relationships are impressive. While he may not abide by the insights being shared with him about Jewish political interests, hopefully he will come to appreciate the deeply embedded contributions that Jews have made to the political discourse and policy positions of this nation.

The international agenda represents another arena of importance to our community. There is consensus that the new president will embrace Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, seeking to promote closer ties between Washington and Jerusalem. As with other policy areas, one has a less clear picture of how a Trump administration will manage our existing treaty obligations and military agreements across the globe.  

Just over a week has passed since this political reality has touched us, yet American Jews who have a profound love for this nation as well as a passion for its politics are still trying to come to grips with a Trump presidency. What lies ahead seems scary and uncertain, but as a people, we have traveled such uncharted pathways before and will yet again.


Steven Windmueller is the Rabbi Alfred Gottschalk Emeritus Professor of Jewish Communal Service at the Jack H. Skirball Campus of the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Los Angeles. His writings can be found at The new political reality: Jews encounter Donald Trump Read More »

Shocked by Trump victory, many L.A. Jews look for ways to move forward

The night after Election Day, the theater of the Electric Lodge in Venice was as dark as the mood of the 20 or so people who gathered there. And yet, as they sat in a circle, disappointed, the space also glowed with candles as they attempted to console one another over Republican Donald Trump’s unexpected victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton.

Seated before a bongo drum, Open Temple Rabbi Lori Shapiro facilitated the discussion, presenting a mock-up of states that went “red” and “blue” and a quote by Founding Father Thomas Paine: “Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it.” 

“I am not a political rabbi,” Shapiro, whose congregation sponsored the evening, wrote in an email to the Journal. “The ‘Express Yourself’ event came from the fact that my texts and emails were off the handle from people in the community who were NOT sleeping Tuesday to Wednesday.”

Jewish Los Angeles is mostly liberal — with notable exceptions in the Persian, Israeli and Orthodox communities — so Trump’s election came as something of a body blow. As the news settled in, many gathered to register their shock and disappointment.

“My hope and expectation was that we would be celebrating a different kind of broken glass, the breaking of a glass ceiling, and instead it evoked Kristallnacht,” Temple Emanuel Rabbi Emerita Laura Geller said at the Open Temple event, noting that the election coincided with the 78th anniversary of the infamous “Night of Broken Glass” when Jewish synagogues, homes and businesses were destroyed in 1938.

Meanwhile, on the other side of town, the egalitarian community IKAR held a get-together at a private residence in Hancock Park, during which attendees responded to a writing prompt that said, “I weep,” followed by, “I pledge.”

“The idea is, ‘Yes, we’re sad, but how is this going to spur us into action?’ ” IKAR Executive Director Melissa Balaban said in a phone interview. 

She told the Journal that an IKAR board meeting had been scheduled for that night but leaders decided instead to provide a space for people to come together in the wake of the election results. 

“The imperative we have as a community is to be there for folks who feel the most vulnerable at a time like this, particularly people of color who are members of our community and friends of the community, LGBT folks, Muslims, Latinos,” Balaban said. “We feel a real need to work together to ensure the safety of all of these people.” 

Speaking from the pulpit the following Saturday, IKAR Rabbi Sharon Brous called Trump’s election “a devastating setback” and “a terrifying new reality.”

“A very dark and very dangerous force has reared its head in our country,” she said. “What was once subterranean has now surfaced and can be shouted from the greatest halls of power of our nation.” 

However, she cautioned her congregants not to lose hope: “The arc of the moral universe does bend toward justice — that is no lie.”

From shock to solidarity

In the progressive and minority communities of Los Angeles, many regarded Donald Trump’s election as a personal affront.

“For us, we feel we’re at the intersection of two of those major communities that feel targeted, and that’s a very scary place,” said Asher Gellis, executive director the Jewish LGBTQ group JQ International.

However, he said after the election, his email inbox filled with messages of support from leaders in the Jewish community and beyond — a sign that the relationships JQ International has tried hard to build are paying off. Gellis said he was still “really in shock” and unsure how to respond to Trump’s victory, but those close relationships would be crucial in the coming months and years.

As the news sank in, shock soon gave way to solidarity. On the Friday after Trump’s election, a group of rabbis took part in a rally outside the Islamic Center of Southern California in Koreatown.

“We’re gonna manage this best by being proud and by being loving,” said Rabbi Robin Podolsky of Temple Beth Israel, a nonaffiliated Highland Park synagogue, as the crowd dispersed.

An open letter from the progressive group Bend the Arc Jewish Action circulated Nov. 10 summed up this position: “To the millions of immigrants, Muslims, people of color, LGBT people, women, people with disabilities, and everyone who is threatened by the President-Elect and his administration, we want you to know: we are with you.” By early the following week, the letter had gathered nearly 40,000 signatures.

Talk therapy

The day after the election, though, many were still focused on gathering their own thoughts and feelings.

“No matter how you feel about the outcome of the election, it is important to acknowledge that this was a monumental and emotional campaign,” the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) wrote in an Election Day statement posted online as votes were being cast. “As airplane safety instructions wisely advise: put your oxygen mask on before you help others with theirs.”

Seeking solace, more than 50 students came together at USC Hillel to reflect on the results on Wednesday, according to USC Hillel Executive Director Bailey London. 

“Some students expressed fear and distress and feel really sad, while others are looking forward to change in government and interested in seeing what unfolds,” London said in a phone interview.

Like many, London was caught off guard by the election results. And on Wednesday afternoon, hours after Clinton’s concession speech, London was still processing her feelings about it.

“I don’t know how I’m feeling yet. I’m stuck in shock. I wasn’t prepared for this,” London said. “It hadn’t dawned on me that Trump was going to win.”

At Temple Emanuel in Beverly Hills on Friday evening, congregants gathered to read Jewish texts and reflect on peace and coming together, according to the temple’s senior Rabbi Jonathan Aaron.

Shabbat is a time to “allow your heart to kind of soften the edges,” he said. Shying away from political discussion or venting, congregants instead reflected on how they could recuperate after an emotionally trying election season.

“It’s about a fracture in the country, the divisiveness in the country,” Aaron said. “We wanted to kind of stem that with talks of peace.”

Five stages of Donald Trump

Two days after the election, Zachary Rodham — a Jewish senior at USC and nephew of the just-defeated Democratic presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton — was in the midst of drafting an email to his aunt. But he was having trouble finding the right words.

“Hard for me to figure out what to say,” the 21-year-old said. “I’m sure what she’s feeling — I’m sure she’s feeling something pretty similar to all of us rooting for and supporting her campaign.”

Rodham spent election night in New York with family, including relatives of Chelsea Clinton’s husband, Marc Mezvinsky, and Bill Clinton’s half brother, Roger, at an Italian restaurant and at the Peninsula hotel. He recounted being shocked as the results were reported.

Speaking two days after the election, the reality had only just begun to sink in.

“People [have been] reaching out to me like somebody in my family passed away,” he said. “And in a way, something did pass away — the energy surrounding her campaign is gone. After Trump got elected, you go through the five stages of grief [and] accept the reality that he is now going to be the president of the United States of America.”

Taking to the streets

Those closest to Clinton resolved to combat the president-elect and his party in Congress.

“What I’m going to do is, starting next week, organize to get people together who have similar beliefs as me and in two years, fight for those elections and get my country back,” Pam Schwartz, a volunteer for the Clinton campaign, told the Journal shortly before Trump was announced the victor on Tuesday night.

The day after the election, and well into the weekend, thousands poured into the streets to voice opposition to the incoming president and identification with those who feel threatened by his election. Among them was Juliette Finkelstein-Hynes, a Jewish high school freshman at the Ramon C. Cortines School of Visual and Performing Arts downtown, who walked out of her classroom Wednesday along with some 300 other students to participate in an anti-Trump march.

“Most of us can’t vote,” she told the Journal on the phone. “So it’s like we want to get our voice heard, and aside from social media or talking to people, we can go out and we can protest and that’s one of the biggest things we can do.”

For her, the demonstration was a way to protest the president-elect and to show that she stands with communities who feel antagonized by his election.

“We were standing with minorities and people of color and women and LGBT people,” she said. “We were standing with all of them. And it was also in opposition to, you know, to all of his policies and who he is as a person.”

Not so fast

Even in L.A.’s overwhelmingly liberal Jewish community, there were some who hailed Trump’s election as a victory for this country and the Jewish state alike.

Edward Schwartz, 69, an intellectual property lawyer from Pasadena, said he supported Trump’s candidacy in large part because he saw him as the more favorable candidate for Israel. Schwartz was an early supporter of Jews Choose Trump, a grass-roots organization that sought to marshal Jews in favor of the Republican.

To the Jewish Angelenos mourning Trump’s election, he advised, “Wait and see. People say a lot of things in campaigns, and then you wait and see what they do when they get in.” For instance, Schwartz said, he hopes and believes Trump will drop his promise from early on in the campaign to deploy federal agents to round up and deport undocumented immigrants.

Reached on the phone Nov. 14, Schwartz suggested the distraught reactions to the Republican’s victory were overblown. “People who believe that they need counseling to get past the results of the election are childish,” he said.

Carol Greenwald, an economist in Maryland and Jews Choose Trump organizer who originally recruited Schwartz for the campaign, echoed his sentiment.

“Rabbis who say, ‘Come cry because of the tragedy,’ have forsaken their leadership,” she said.

Cause for concern

Yet some found reason to redouble their resolve following a seeming outburst of racist sentiment after Trump’s victory.

On Nov. 11, the ADL reported in a blog post, “In the days following Donald Trump’s election, there has been a spike in reports of racist and anti-Semitic graffiti and vandalism, including widespread use of swastikas and other Nazi imagery.” Among other incidents, the ADL highlighted a trolley stop at UC San Diego that had been vandalized with a swastika and the words “Heil Trump.”

“The overwhelming response that I’ve gotten here has been, ‘I’ve never been more dedicated to ADL’s mission,’ ” Amanda Susskind, ADL director for the Pacific Southwest region, told the Journal shortly after the election.

Other community organizations responded with similar notes of renewed dedication to their causes.

“Every decent American — across lines of party, ideology, religion, race, national origin, and sexual orientation — must act now together to isolate the haters, reject their gospels of division and violence,” Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, wrote in the Huffington Post.

In a joint letter (see page 15), a group of more 100 Jewish historians struck a similar message, condemning what they called “unprecedented expressions of racial, ethnic, gender-based, and religious hatred.”

Establishment reacts

Along with the ADL, a number of prominent Jewish organizations quickly shifted into gear to react to Trump’s election. 

Many wrote to offer him their congratulations and support. The Jewish Federations of North America, for instance, wrote the president-elect to pledge its cooperation, going so far as to include the phone number of its Washington office’s director, William Daroff. Likewise, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs and Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations each penned short but congratulatory notes to Trump.

Others were more circumspect in their responses. The leaders of the country’s major Reform institutions offered to work with the next president — provided he uses the office as a vehicle to “bring Americans together.”

“If he does so, we will be ready to work with him for the common good,” they wrote in a joint letter. “If he does not, we also stand ready to be fierce advocates for the values that guide us: inclusivity, justice and compassion.”

Many tentative opponents of the president-elect sounded similar notes of patient watchfulness.

ADL’s Susskind pointed to Trump’s election night remarks, during which he called on Americans to “come together” and “bind the wounds of division.” She said her office would be glad to work with the administration toward those goals, but would also be quick to speak out against any perceived anti-Semitism or bigotry.

“His immediate first speech after being elected was perfectly lovely and harmonious and unity-seeking,” she said. “If that’s where he goes from here — great.”

Shocked by Trump victory, many L.A. Jews look for ways to move forward Read More »

The day after the election: Jewish community reacts

The day after Donald J. Trump was elected president of the United States, the editors of Jewish Insider — a division of TRIBE Media, which produces the Journal — emailed prominent readers on the meaning and implication of the victory. 

What follows are some of the thoughts of former Anti-Defamation League director Abe Foxman, columnist Leon Wieseltier, attorney and author Alan Dershowitz, author Daniel Gordis, fashion icon Diane von Furstenberg and Republican Jewish Coalition board member Michael Epstein.

JEWISH INSIDER: Are you concerned about a rise in anti-Semitism?

ABE FOXMAN: Revolutions usually don’t have good consequences for the Jewish community. But I think in this revolution, the good news is it’s not about us. We were not an issue in the election, although some wanted to make Jews an issue. Israel was not an issue, the Iran deal was out there. But this revolution happened without us. We were not central. Not even Jewish money was a major thing. I think that’s a good thing.

The bad thing is that for this revolution to happen, it had to break taboos. What worries me is Trumpism — the ugly element in our society. What Trump did was break taboos, all kind of taboos. And when you break [those] kind of taboos, you give a certain hechsher (license) to the bigots that are there. But now we are talking about Donald Trump the president, a leader, and not a candidate. I am optimistic. And I think what we heard in his victory speech, we will continue to hear because what motivates people like him is that they want to lead, and now he’s got to lead everybody.

LEON WIESELTIER: The Trump campaign’s malign neglect of the anti-Semitic words and images in its midst was contemptible, and no amount of visits by [Trump’s daughter] Ivanka and Jared [Kushner, her husband] to the Lubavitcher Rebbe’s grave will absolve it. But the chief threat from the Trump right is not to Jews. It is to Muslims and Mexicans, to immigrants, to African-Americans, to all the “others” in our society. We must have zero tolerance for anti-Semitism, obviously, but we must not mistake every expression of it for a dire emergency. This ugliness is not primarily about us. At this moment we owe our solidarity to the main targets of the Trumpist bigots.

ALAN DERSHOWITZ: It may embolden anti-Semites of the alt-right.

DANIEL GORDIS: No one knows what this means for anything. Trump himself has no idea. America will lurch conservative, that much is clear. But what that will look like is anyone’s guess. That is also true of the anti-Semitism issue. There were undeniable anti-Semitic tropes in his campaign. The question isn’t whether Trump himself is anti-Semitic.It almost doesn’t matter. What matters is that his election legitimates a mode of discourse and a set of beliefs among others. There has never, in all of Jewish history, been a society that was mean and hateful that despised some minorities that didn’t eventually get to the Jews. Which is why the fact that Ivanka is Jewish could not possibly matter less. 

JEWISH INSIDER: What will life look like for the Jewish community with a President Trump? 

WIESELTIER: Pretty much the way it looks now. This is — still! — America: We pursue our religious and communal lives regardless of who the president is. Trump’s presidency will polarize our community, which is as it should be. The Jewish right will follow the Israeli right into the dangerous illusion that the two-state solution is now a thing of the past. The Pesach seder in the White House will include shemurah matzah.

DERSHOWITZ: Life will probably not change for most Jews.

GORDIS: As divided and mean-spirited as we all knew America is, it’s much worse than we allowed ourselves to think. Such societies have never been good to or for the Jews. The openness, tolerance and gentility which made Jewish flourishing in America possible has now ended, at least for a while. Jewish accomplishment, success and access will not end overnight, but if this persists for the long haul, it is not at all unlikely that the golden era of American Jewish life has begun to wane.

DIANE VON FURSTENBERG: Today is the first day of the rest of our lives. We must believe that our future is in our hands. More than ever, we must believe in good and the good of people. More than ever, we must study, learn, be open-minded, be generous and have compassion. More than ever, we must be an example of good and influence the good. Whatever voice we have, we must use it to influence others so that our country celebrates what we cherish about it … its openness and inclusiveness. 

JEWISH INSIDER: What effect will Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cozying up to Trump today have on pro-Israel progressive outreach?

DERSHOWITZ: Every leader of every country will try to establish good relations with Trump. To single out Netanyahu for criticism is to apply a double standard.

WIESELTIER: Of course, it’s bad. Everything Netanyahu does is bad for gaining progressive support for Israel. Alienating vast precincts of American Jewry is one of his greatest skills. Meanwhile, the Israeli-Palestinian problem will only get worse.

GORDIS: American progressives have the luxury of preaching at Israel from the safety of their American perches. Israelis — and Bibi — have the responsibility to stay alive. Bibi clearly would have preferred Hillary — “the devil you know.” Having gotten Trump, though, Netanyahu has to worry about Israel’s security, with the U.S. now in the hands of an inexperienced, not terribly smart, easily offended leader with no policies in mind. Even the Palestinians are cozying up to Trump; it would be suicidal for Netanyahu to be doing anything else.

JEWISH INSIDER: What about the anti-Semitic trolls empowered by Trump?

MICHAEL EPSTEIN: The Republicans have to continue to disempower them. The far left has these issues too, especially on some college campuses. The Democrats have not disempowered them the way they should. … I didn’t think Trump’s closing ad was anti-Semitic. We Jews are small in number but great in influence, we work hard and have great intellect. Are we supposed to shy away from that? Jews can be oversensitive to those things but the ad wasn’t anti-Semitic.

To sign up for Jewish Insider’s morning briefing providing a succinct overview of the news, buzz and stories of the day, go to http://www.jewishinsider.com.

The day after the election: Jewish community reacts Read More »

Please keep calling us racists and misogynists

Turns out that the whole Democratic Party lost hugely on Election Day. In addition to losing the presidency, Republicans retained control of the Senate despite far more Republican Senate seats being on the ballot; they held their already substantial majority in the House of Representatives; and now 33 of the nation’s 50 governors are Republican. 

That’s two Republican governors for every Democrat.

One of the newly elected governors is Eric Greitens of Missouri. He is a former Navy SEAL and Rhodes scholar — and a committed Jew. Will he, too, be labeled a Republican racist, misogynist, xenophobe, homophobe, Islamophobe, bigot and the latest — transphobe?

That’s what the left has done for a half-century: libel and label conservatives. 

This past week was a prime example. Within hours of the Republican defeat of Democrats on the local, state and congressional levels, in addition to the loss of the White House, the left doubled down on its usual outpouring of calumnies at Republican voters as deplorable human beings.

Please continue. It is clearly working on conservatives’ behalf. More and more Americans — and I predict more and more Black and female Americans — will see these smears for what they are: a cover for an inability to intellectually counter conservative arguments.

It seems universally believed on the left that conservative opposition to Hillary Clinton was due to her being a woman. See Peter Beinart’s piece in The Atlantic titled “Fear of a Female President,” which says, “Hillary Clinton’s candidacy has provoked a wave of misogyny — one that may roil American life for years to come.” 

See the open letter written by Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank to his distraught 12-year-old daughter: “To my daughter: You are going to be okay.”

This is how his column begins:

“As I watched the returns at Donald Trump’s celebration here Tuesday night, the hardest part was trying to reassure my seventh-grade daughter at home, via phone and text, that she would be okay. She had expected to be celebrating the election of the first female president, but instead, this man she had been reading and hearing horrible things about had won, and she feared her own world could come apart.”

As a loving father, he might want to reflect on whether his own overwrought views contributed to his daughter’s fearing that “her own world would come apart” if a woman weren’t elected president.

Milbank made sure to inform his readers that he was a Jew by reassuring his daughter that she will feel better when she receives all of her family’s love at her upcoming bat mitzvah.

Of course, the reduction of Republican votes to misogyny, racism, xenophobia, etc., was hardly unique to Jewish leftists. In The Washington Post on the day after the election, Jill Filipovic, a young feminist writer, explained Hillary Clinton’s loss this way: 

“[It was] a clear statement of what so many of my countrymen (and the people who put Trump in power are mostly men) value: white male supremacy above all.”

And in The New York Times, Susan Chira, a senior correspondent and editor on gender issues, made up a rule: “We do know that voters disproportionately punish women who are seen as dishonest.”

For eight years, many on the left have described criticism of Barack Obama as racist. Similarly, leftists explain opposition to Hillary Clinton as an expression of misogyny and sexism. For the left, it is not possible that conservative opposition to either has been rooted in public policy and moral differences that have nothing to do with race or gender.

Then there is another hysterical charge on the Jewish left, that a President Trump will make anti-Semitism respectable. This, too, is old news. In 1980, Coretta Scott King, the widow of Martin Luther King Jr., said, “I am scared that if Ronald Reagan gets into office, we are going to see more of the Ku Klux Klan and a resurgence of the Nazi Party.”

But the scare tactics apparently aren’t working as well as they once did. More and more Americans are catching on to the left’s crying wolf regarding racism, misogyny, sexism and all the other terms of opprobrium hurled at conservatives.

But leftists won’t stop, for two reasons: That’s all they have. And because they really do believe their libels about conservatives. Why wouldn’t they? It’s all they’ve ever read, heard or studied.

Incredibly, many Jews symbolically sat shivah at their synagogues last week. But for all the harm the left has done to universities, to Judaism, Jews, Israel, America and to Western civilization, they should have done teshuvah instead. 


Dennis Pragers nationally syndicated radio talk show is heard in Los Angeles on KRLA (AM 870) 9 a.m. to noon. His latest project is the internet-based Prager University (prageru.com).

Please keep calling us racists and misogynists Read More »

Appeasing the crocodile

To the approximately 30 percent of American Jews who supported, voted for and have celebrated Donald Trump’s win; and to the approximately 75 percent of my fellow Iranian-American Jews who are part of the 30 percent: 

Congratulations. Your guy won. I respect the election results as I respect your right to your opinion and your vote. I also understand your past frustration with a president you did not like, and current excitement about having your candidate win. I experienced similar sentiments throughout the Bush years and in the aftermath. For the record, I don’t believe, as some on the left have said, that everyone who voted for Trump is a bigot or a misogynist or worse. I understand that some people on the left and right are what the media call one-issue voters — lower taxes, disgust with Washington, the candidate’s business savvy, the environment and so on. I also understand that just because you voted for a candidate does not mean you agree with or approve of everything about him or all of his policies. I, for example, was not at all pleased with Hillary Clinton’s cozy relationship with the Goldman Sachses of the world. But for me, that wasn’t a deal breaker. I voted for her despite that flaw.  

But there’s one question I haven’t been able to find an answer to, and so I’m going to pose it here, respectfully and earnestly, out of sheer curiosity and in hopes of receiving answers. Here it is: 

As members of one of the most persecuted, reviled, rejected and misunderstood minorities in history, are you at all bothered by the idea of building a wall to keep some people out, or stopping immigration from certain countries, or judging an entire people by the sins of a few among them? 

As children of the proverbial wandering Jew, offspring of innocents who died in gas chambers and later in displaced persons camps because no country would permit them entry, do you ever think about the importance of offering safe haven to the displaced? 

You, American Jews who, as late as 1950s, lived with signs such as “No Jews or Dogs” in Florida hotels, you, Iranian-American Jews who, only 40 years ago, were saved by this country’s generous immigration policies, do you wonder what would have become of you had you not been allowed in? 

Yes, some of the immigrants from Muslim countries are terrorists. But I remember a day not so long ago, when every day, Americans thought that all of us Iranians were terrorists. I remember being yelled at and called names and told to go back where I came from. Do you ever think of those times and imagine what it must be like now for Latinos and Muslims? 

Yes, the men and women who clean our houses, work in our restaurants, on our construction sites, in our kosher grocery stores are poor and, some, undocumented. But do you ever think about how poor we Jews were in Iran up until the mid-20th century, how we went to bed hungry, put our children to work in factories at age 6, went blind or died of lung disease in our 30s because we had spent a lifetime weaving rugs in badly lit hovels? If you do think about those times, do you still agree that undocumented workers should be deported in droves? 

Yes, Donald Trump has a Jewish son-in-law and a Jewish daughter and Jewish grandchildren. That could mean he doesn’t have a low opinion of Jews. Or it could mean he had to accept his daughter’s decision to marry a Jew. Either way, it’s safe to assume that he doesn’t plan to deport or keep out any Jews. But you and I both know that you wouldn’t be cheering him on today had he targeted any of us in his speeches. In fact, I suspect — and hope — that you’d be screaming against him from the rooftops. Do you ever wonder about the moral correctness of turning a blind eye or even condoning a treatment of others as long as it doesn’t apply to you and yours? 

Finally, as you side with a president-elect who has promised to keep out economic immigrants and political refugees, do you worry at all that you may be creating an atmosphere of intolerance of minorities that can, some day, include Jews? That you may, in Winston Churchill’s words, be “feeding a crocodile” only to end up being “eaten last”?

I’m not asking why you voted for Trump or what you think of him as a person or even as a president. I’m not interested in discussing one candidate’s qualities versus the other’s. I’m not attempting to make a point here. I know better than to try to change anyone’s mind, on the right or the left, about their politics. I’m asking because I honestly would like a calm and reasoned response, to this one question, on this one issue. 

I’m listening with an open mind.


GINA NAHAI’s most recent novel is “The Luminous Heart of Jonah S.”

Appeasing the crocodile Read More »

The irony of hate

Typically, I try to keep politics off of the pulpit. I believe the job of clergy is to help people deepen their relationship with God, and I recommend only that everyone act ethically and become active and involved in their political passions. But the circumstances of the last week have created a situation that I believe must be addressed from a Jewish perspective.

I understand emotions have run high throughout this election cycle, as they do every four years. In 2000, I remember so many politically liberal friends angry and sad about the presidential election, and committing themselves to working in the next cycle harder for their candidate and beliefs. In 2008 and 2012, I heard many conservative friends bemoan the election and re-election of Barack Obama, and express their fears of what they felt he would do to the country. But in all of these cases, there was always a respect for their political opponents and an acceptance that after the election was over, we would come together as Americans.

Our tradition is filled with rabbis and Sages having passionate debates over a multiplicity of topics. These dialogues are so intense that they are even referred to as a “War between Sages” (Bavli Bava Metzia 59b). It is a Jewish tradition to passionately argue our beliefs, and again in the tractate Bava Metzia (84a) we learn through the story of Rabbi Yochanan and Resh Lakish that it is through this passionate discourse that a “fuller comprehension” can be achieved. This is the basis of the process of argumentation in the Great Assembly wherein the court made a ruling based on the sages’ arguments.

But in Judaism, this is traditionally done with respect for one another. We don’t degrade our opponents personally. After the decision is reached, we do not continue debating, and our history is clear to respect the outcome of the debate.

I am beyond saddened that these simple demonstrations of respect seem to have left our political world on a national level, and instead so many people have resorted to hate and violence. There have been riots in cities throughout the country, including the destruction of shops and businesses, and even shootings as people have decided that it is OK to act with hatred in their hearts. All of the accusations made by these demonstrators that president-elect Donald Trump is oppressive, bigoted and dangerous have become manifest in their own inappropriate actions of violent demonstrations. They are the ones acting out of hatred toward their fellow Americans just because they disagree with them politically. These rioters are demonstrating not only a complete lack of respect for the political process and for America, but in their actions they are showing a self-involved narcissism that discounts the fact that half of the nation feels differently than they do. 

These demonstrators have become the hate that they so vehemently allege to oppose.

I applaud everyone who passionately stands for their beliefs and tries to legally make changes in policies. But it is ethically wrong on every level to violently demonstrate just because you didn’t get your way. It is against the moral fabric of this nation’s history to unilaterally decide to ignore the results of an election just because it didn’t go the way you wanted. Liberals didn’t act like this in 2000; conservatives didn’t do it in 2008 and 2012. It is against Jewish ethical practices to violently demonstrate in this way, and it is a dangerous form of adolescent behavior that is a direct expression of a hate for others with opposing political views. Ironically, it is a manifestation of the hatred these rioters accuse their political opponents of having —yet they are the ones truly showing actions of darkness and hate in these riots.

If you are unhappy with the results of the election, I encourage you to get involved in the political process for the next cycle. Please become a champion for your beliefs through the election of candidates who you support, but I beg you to remove any of the hatred in your heart that is expressed in inappropriate actions of violence toward the man who was legally elected to be our president — and toward his supporters. 

Like the sages of old, we must come together now and try to make changes in the future through respectful and legal ways — not through these hate-filled demonstrations, but through mutually respectful and legal processes. If you have been involved in these riots, please stop trying to make a change through violence and instead work together alongside those with whom you disagree in attempts to find harmony with one another in policies and practices. Please don’t act like like angry children; instead, demonstrate a respect for those you disagree with and engage in a healthy discourse.

Let go of the anger and hatred in your hearts, and I beg you instead to come together as Americans and human beings who recognize that everyone has the same goal: to see a brighter future in this country for our children and their children.

Rabbi Hillel taught: “If I am not for myself, who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I? If not now, when?” (Pirkei Avot 1:14). Let us all in this time choose to respect one another, and act on that respect without hatred in our hearts and actions. And maybe if we really respect one another even in our differences, our nation and the world will be more filled with peace.

That is my prayer. Will you join me in this prayer for peace through mutual respect?


Rabbi Michael Barclay is the spiritual leader of Temple Ner Simcha in Westlake Village (nersimcha.org) and the author of “Sacred Relationships: Biblical Wisdom for Deepening Our Lives Together.” He can be reached at RabbiBarclay@aol.com.

The irony of hate Read More »

Investigate the FBI

It seems very clear to me that FBI Director James Comey’s Oct. 28 letter announcing a reopening of the investigation into emails from Hillary Clinton changed the outcome of the election. For nine of the final 11 days before the election, the negative story dominated the news and cast a cloud over her candidacy, and the polls reflected a downturn for Clinton during that same time. In the end, Clinton narrowly lost four states — Florida, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania — where voters who said they decided in the final week greatly favored Donald Trump. I think it is safe to say that without Comey’s letter, Clinton would be our next president.

As strange, and possibly illegal, as it was for Comey to make his announcement regarding the investigation so close to the election, from the outset, I wondered what the legal grounds were for searching through the new emails found on the laptop of her aide Huma Abedin’s estranged husband, Anthony Weiner. Two days after Comey’s letter, on Oct. 30, The New York Times reported that the Justice Department had obtained a search warrant. I have yet to see any further reporting on the warrant. To get a search warrant issued, the FBI needed to go to a federal judge. It is interesting to me that Comey sent his letter before obtaining the warrant. The publicity certainly must have influenced the judge. A judge cannot simply grant any request for a search warrant. Under the Fourth Amendment, a search must be reasonable, meaning there must be “probable cause” or a “reasonable suspicion” that evidence of a crime will be discovered. Ordinarily, the FBI submits an affidavit describing the evidence that gives rise to the reasonable suspicion. We have yet to see what evidence the FBI relied on in seeking the warrant.

The only thing Comey said in his letter about the grounds for reviewing the emails found on Weiner’s laptop was that they “appear to be pertinent” to the FBI’s prior investigation of Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state. But it is important to remember how unusual and politically motivated the investigation was, and that it had never elicited any evidence of a crime.

Certainly since the Watergate investigations led to the recommendation of impeachment and resignation of Richard Nixon, Republicans have dreamed of doing the same thing to a Democratic president. During the presidency of Bill Clinton, investigations into allegations concerning the Whitewater real estate development turned into a roving investigation in search of a crime (Travelgate, Filegate), until finally stumbling on Bill Clinton’s false denial of a recent affair with White House aide Monica Lewinsky in a deposition concerning allegations by Paula Jones of harassment prior to his election. The same pattern reappeared in the Republican-led Benghazi investigation, which ultimately found no wrongdoing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton but uncovered that she had, against State Department policies, used a private email server for State Department business. This resulted in a further investigation, despite the fact that there was no reason to believe any crime had been committed.

Still, because the private server had been used for public business, Clinton could not object to requests to search her work-related emails, which were delivered to Congressional investigators in 2014. In July 2016, Comey concluded that after reviewing tens of thousands of emails, there was no evidence that any prosecutable crime had occurred.

There are millions of federal employees with access to classified information, and all of them leave the office and go home, where they talk to other people, make telephone calls, write letters and diaries, and send texts and emails. Simply because someone has the ability to commit the crime of intentionally violating laws governing the handling of classified information does not give rise to a reasonable suspicion that any crime has been committed. If it did, then the FBI could at any time gain a search warrant to inspect the private communications of each and every employee who has a security clearance.

The FBI had to allege more than that the emails might be pertinent to an investigation that had yet to result in evidence of a crime. To obtain a warrant, it had to establish probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime would be found.

Since we now know that no such evidence was found on the laptop, it is time to investigate why the FBI believed it had probable cause.

I can think of two possible explanations. It could be that Comey, like most Republicans, believed there was a sufficient cloud of suspicion over Hillary Clinton to justify pretty much any investigation. Think of how the FBI might treat a notorious gangster like Al Capone. “Get me something on him! Anything!” the FBI director might tell his subordinates. That certainly seems to be how many in the FBI thought of Clinton, even after Comey had reported in July that there would be no prosecution. Some agents were already in open revolt over the email probe three weeks before Comey’s surprise announcement. So maybe they never even thought much about the probable cause requirement, and perhaps the judge signed the search warrant, mindful of the intense public attention to the issue, without really considering the legal standard of whether the suspicions raised were reasonable.

But it could also be that the FBI made a serious attempt to show probable cause, and submitted affidavits from investigators supporting the issuance of the warrant. Often, the FBI relies on confidential informants, and so the affidavit might contain new allegations of criminal activity and evidence different from what had already been reviewed and dismissed as insufficient in July. It is this possibility that has me most interested in the case. What if the new allegations came from people associated with the Trump campaign? What if the allegations were intentionally false? During the nine days when the investigation was underway, Trump surrogate Rudy Giuliani made public statements suggesting he was in communication with the FBI about the ongoing investigation. It does not seem too far-fetched to believe that politically motivated individuals might have tried to get the FBI to reopen the investigation of Clinton by making false allegations. Finding Abedin’s emails on Weiner’s laptop might have been just such an opportunity to carry out their wishes.

We need to remember that whatever suspicions were raised by the FBI when it sought the new search warrant, those suspicions turned out to be groundless. Whoever thought Clinton committed a crime in mishandling her emails was wrong. And whoever thought the emails on Weiner’s laptop contained evidence of that crime also was wrong.

Remember, this is not a case where the FBI was investigating a particular crime or something reported by a victim. No dead body had been found. There was never any suggestion of a specific security breach, as there was when CIA agent Valerie Plame was exposed in a Washington Post article. This was, and has always been, a Republican-inspired fishing expedition that came up empty. It is now time to turn our focus on those who encouraged and led the investigation, to determine whether, in fact, a real crime has been committed by the FBI or those who informed its investigation.

My hope is that the media and, perhaps, the Justice Department already are looking at this in a more expedited fashion. Richard Painter, a former White House chief ethics lawyer in the George W. Bush administration, has called for an investigation. 

For my part, I have made a Freedom of Information Act request to the FBI to see the search warrant and supporting affidavits. This is potentially very serious, something that if traced back to Donald Trump might even lead to impeachment. It deserves to be investigated fully and openly and quickly, because if a crime was committed in the course of the FBI investigation, it is the crime of the century.


E. Randol Schoenberg is an attorney and a law lecturer at USC. He can be reached at randol@bslaw.net.

Investigate the FBI Read More »

Being Leonard Cohen’s rabbi

I last saw Leonard Cohen a few months ago. He had asked me to come to his place. After brief pleasantries, he said to me, “Reb, I am getting ready to shuffle off this mortal coil. I have some questions for you.”

He and I had spoken about “Hamlet” more than a few times. I knew the play and especially the soliloquy were close to his heart, and, at that moment, closer than ever. He knew he was soon not to be, at least in this frail frame. I remember thinking to myself, “I have to remember every word we say.”

We spoke longer than we ever had before, maybe four or five hours straight. Children and grandchildren genially punctuated our talk. Adam and Jessica popped in, with young Cassius Cohen in tow, commanding the room with a series of pointed questions and comments. Lorca came in. Viva lit up the room. Leonard shed his age and frailty for a moment and took on a mantle of joy. 

Rebecca De Mornay, his former fiancée, stopped in. He tried to convince her to come to synagogue. We had some dinner and cookies. He asked me if I wanted to listen to the album he was working on. He played me tracks from “You Want It Darker” from his computer. I particularly remembered the title song, and also “Steer Your Way”: 

Steer your path through the pain
That is far more real than you
That smashed the cosmic model
That blinded every view
And please don’t make me go there
Tho’ there be a god or not

Year by year
Month by month
Day by day
Thought by thought

If you are familiar with Lurianic Kabbalah, and its main heretical interpretation, Sabbateanism, you will understand this album, these two songs, and I think much of his body of poetry and lyrics. I think that whatever drew Leonard to me, for me to be his rabbi these last 10 years, was that for each of us, Lurianic Kabbalah gave voice to the impossible brokenness of the human condition. The pain of the Divine breakage permeates reality. We inherit it; it inhabits us. We can deny it. Or we can study and teach it, write it and sing its mournful songs. 

Leonard and Anjani

I met Leonard and his then-partner Anjani Thomas when I officiated at the wedding of Larry Klein and Luciana Souza in August 2006. Larry had produced the album “Blue Alert,” with music by Anjani and lyrics by Leonard. 

After the wedding, I was seated next to Leonard and Anjani. They interrogated me thoroughly. Leonard listened carefully. He had this slight grin when he listened. He could see the opportunity for wit, either from himself or from a game discussion partner, a mile a way. Leonard was interested in my brand of Judaism, which I called at the time Post Orthodox Neo Chasidic. He chuckled at the acronym. 

I called my wife, Meirav, after the reception (she was in Israel) and asked her if she had heard of Leonard Cohen. She almost fainted long distance. “I used to cry myself to sleep when I was in high school, writing poems and listening to his albums.” “Oops” I thought. 

I did some research on Leonard that week and was astounded. I bought and listened to several of his albums, got his songbooks. I ordered his books of poetry and sank into them. I listened to “Blue Alert” in enraptured silence, and again when my wife returned from Israel. 

I was very, very moved by that album, and everything else. I was deeply touched by him. I realized, ruefully, that I had been in the presence of a Great Man. Oh, well. 

I was more than astounded — flabbergasted? — when Leonard and Anjani walked into shul the next Shabbat. Turns out that Anjani wanted to come for more of the spiritual psychology and she encouraged him to come, knowing this was something with which he would connect. Leonard was hesitant about joining a synagogue. They became regulars, attending weekly. 

Anjani and Leonard also started attending my Monday night classes, Jewish spiritual psychology dharma talks. I taught Mussar, gave talks on Chasidut and led meditations. I did not know yet that Leonard was a Buddhist monk. I probably would have been self-conscious leading meditations in front of him had I known. He would sit in the front row, shoes off, in his signature suit, tie and fedora, eyes closed, listening, radiant. I asked him what he liked about my teachings. What in particular?

“It’s not just the words,” he said. “You are a healer.” I was taken aback. 

Leonard and Anjani stayed for lunch after services. Anjani and my wife became close friends (and remain so). Leonard and I became close but never chummy. He actually was much more comfortable around my wife, whom I think he truly loved. He and I only talked about deep stuff until it hurt and we had to stop. We weren’t able to chitchat. 

Deep discussions

The congregants loved Leonard. He was genteel, even chivalrous. He enjoyed the community — the music, the food and the vibe. I asked him once why he liked Ohr HaTorah and he said, “Because you are not uptight.”  

A congregant once said to him she was happy that he had found a place to practice his Judaism. Leonard then pointed over to me and said, “It’s not because it’s Jewish. It’s that man that I come for. I would follow him if he were flipping burgers.”

I don’t understand that, but I can tell you what I think. Leonard (he called himself Eliezer and me “Reb”) pushed me hard to explain my take on the kabbalah. 

Lurianic Kabbalah sees the breaking of the vessels as the poetic truth that defined the breakage of the human being. When I took over the mysticism class at the Academy for Jewish Religion, California, around 2003, I worked my way through Scholem’s classic “Sabbatai Sevi” and saw the inner truth in kabbalah’s greatest heresy. Leonard also had read this heavy tome, and nearly everything on kabbalah that I had read. (He and I both studied from Daniel Matt’s masterful translation of the Zohar.) 

We both had seen the terrifying obsidian luminosity. We shared a world of Divine absence, except for a shattered residue. We shared a common language, a common nightmare. I think Leonard finally found a rabbi who spoke the truth from which he wrote. I spoke about it unafraid because I think I was more afraid not to speak this truth. Like Leonard a bit, I guess. I was a good teacher. He, on the other hand, was a great poet. What took me a half-hour to say, he could say in three words. 

We often came back to one issue of dispute. By temperament, but maybe more as a professional obligation, I offered a path of repairing the broken vessels. I think Leonard could not accept that suture. Spiritually, I am somewhat equipoised between Neoplatonism and Gnosticism — topics about which we spoke often. Leonard often took the Gnostic turn. He said to me that the human condition is mangled into a box into which the broken soul does not fit. We all chafe, terribly. 

After many of those discussions, I told him that I thought some of his poems were liturgy (especially his “Book of Mercy”), liturgy of the breakage. He told me that he thought everything he wrote was liturgy. I was a professor of liturgy, and I considered him the greatest liturgist of our time, and one of the greatest of all time. 

Where from? Leonard’s grandfather was a Talmid Chacham, a Talmud scholar. Leonard let me borrow a copy of a sefer his grandfather wrote. A true rabbinic classic — and beautifully written. As far as I know, it remains untranslated and unavailable. 

I told him about my tentative connection with Rav Yakov Leib HaKohain, a spiritual descendant of the Donmeh, a self proclaimed Neo-Sabbatean. I broke off but Leonard kept up. I honesty felt a bit nervous learning from a Sabbatean, neo or not. Leonard had no such qualms. 

Soul of a poet

Once in an old radio interview in Canada, the interviewer asked Leonard if he had ever considered changing his name. He said, “Yes, to September.” She said, in some surprise, “Leonard September?” and he said, “No, September Cohen.” I think I knew him well enough to know that he wanted to say “Elul” (the month before the Days of Awe).  For those afflicted with the bittersweet sadness of the broken soul, Elul is a time of intense inner scrutiny preparing for the Days of Awe. 

Often after services, he asked me if I wanted to hear a poem. “Gladly,” I would say. Once, we sat down and he recited a poem, classic darkly luminous Cohen. Short lines. Couplets. Maybe 20 stanzas, perhaps more. Serrated edge of a murder weapon used on a guy who had it coming to him. 

After soaking in that one, I asked him how long it took him to write it. I had known him for about a year, so I thought, “A month?”  I truly think he said, “Fifteen years.”  He also recited for me one time many unpublished verses of “Bird on the Wire.” Like thousands, I guess, I still sing that song to myself. Just another drunk in the midnight choir. 

He sent me poetry he was working on (I think I was on a list) until the week before he passed. He wrote me on Friday that he wished he could come to shul to hear my new series of talks on a deep dive into Genesis. He died on Monday. 

Once at lunch, he asked a group of people if they would like him to recite a poem based on a sermon I gave. People expected a brief “Book of Longing” kind of gem.  This poem also had maybe 20 stanzas. He wrote that one in about a week. 

Leonard and the Muse

Even though Leonard and Anjani split up a couple of years ago, most of the time we knew Leonard, he was with Anjani. She brought him to the house. We would prepare meals and celebrate holidays together. 

It was sweet and funny to think how ordinary it was. One Thanksgiving, we had Leonard and Anjani and David and Rebecca Mamet over. The women were in the kitchen preparing food and the men were on the back porch drinking whiskey. 

Not so ordinary was that we on the porch eventually talked about where our ideas come from, because people always ask us. Fewer people ask me, but people ask me nonetheless. 

Leonard said, as he often did, that if he knew where his poems came from, he would go there more often. We all spoke about feeling that we were in the service of the Muse (the Bat Kol). We tried to channel her. We had to be careful around her. I remember we all stopped talking at once, agreeing silently that she did not want people talking about her as if she weren’t listening in. We said enough and stopped and went back to drinking and swapping jokes. Man, I loved his laugh. He would have a visceral experience of pure joy at a punchline. The torment would cease for a moment. 

One night when we had them over, Leonard asked Anjani to sing from “Blue Alert.” Anjani sat at our baby grand, Leonard across from her softly singing along with a beatific look on his face. Meirav and I barely dared to breathe. The words, the piano, the voices — I was transported to another world. I had the strangest thought: “Now I understand music.” When Anjani sang “The Mist,” Meirav and I broke into tears. Then they started tearing up. Then Anjani said, “He wrote that when he was 17.”

A giving man

Let me tell you how generous Leonard was. First, after I knew him about a year, he gave me one of his fedoras, right off of his head. 

Second, when our synagogue was scraping bottom during a brutal remodeling of the dilapidated building we bought, Leonard (with several other families) came to the rescue. He was very generous (always handed his checks in person) and appreciative of the work my wife (the designer and general contractor) was doing. On one of this visits to the building, he spent a full afternoon with Meirav. He delighted in everything we had done, especially the café and the preschool. He visited with the kids in the pre-kindergarten. (The teachers almost fainted.) Got some of the lentil soup that he loved — he liked to call it “Jacob’s stew.”

He often signed his emails “Old Priest” and so I called myself “Old Sarge.” He got a kick out of knowing that I was a sergeant in the Marines a million years ago and hearing some of the stories from my military days. When we talked politics, he would quote a line of his: “Oh, and one more thing. You won’t like what comes next after America.”  

A few more things. He aimed to be a vegetarian but made exceptions every time my wife made her Yemenite lamb soup. One Passover seder, he testified to the benefits of yoga and showed us poses, including standing on his head. He loved the music at Ohr HaTorah (handcrafted by our music director, the rebbetzin). One year, he brought all of the singers and not a few of the musicians on his tour to our High Holy Days services. We saw him at one point standing up and dancing. I read from his “Book of Mercy,” and do so every year. 

Leonard and Judaism

People asked how could he be Jewish if he was a Buddhist monk. He told me Zen Buddhism, at least the kind that he practiced, was not a religion. It was a tuning fork for consciousness. He was a devoted Jew, a learned, deep and troubled one — a genius. He had candles lit every Shabbat. I received photos of candles lit on the tours. 

Once when he was at the monastery with Zen master Roshi up at Mount Baldy, a group of Chabad guys trekked up there during Chanukah to return him to Judaism. They found him in his robes, I think he told me. He told them to shush, took them to his quarters. His Chanukah candles were sputtering. They had brought some whiskey with them. He had plastic cups. And then he told them about his Judaism and his meditative path. The way that Eliezer told me the story, they got mellow, sang and danced. The Chabad guys left a bit drunk, more than satisfied that the monk was still Jewish, and maybe a little chastened. 

Farewell

One day, with his children’s permission, maybe I will be able to write about that conversation that began with “Hamlet.” As I write these words, my heart is too heavy, too broken. I knew Leonard’s soul and feel it in my own. He knew mine. I think he sought me out to tell me his version, and invited me to tell him mine. I saw us as a couple of quasi-Sabbatean Neo-Chasidic kabbalists sharing a thick, dark night in that “Bunch of Lonesome Heroes”: 

“I’d like to tell my story,”
Said one of them so bold
“Oh, yes, I’d like to tell my story
’cause you know I feel I’m turning into gold.”

Being Leonard Cohen’s rabbi Read More »

A Letter to the Taharah Team

[Ed. Note: This letter was written by a parent and congregant, and received by the rabbi of a congregation, who then passed it along to a member of the Taharah team there. That Taharah team person is active with Kavod v’Nichum and the Gamliel Institute, and felt that it might be appropriate to share with others. Permission was sought to use the letter here, in the Expired And Inspired blog, withholding names and identifying information. This is part of why we, members of various Chevrah Kadisha teams do what we do. — JB]

 

Dear Rabbi;

I am not sure how to send this to the community, but I wanted to somehow share this:

A year ago when my daughter passed away, I made a promise to myself that when I finally had my wits about me, I would find a way to publically thank the synagogue community for their help through Rivkah's illness and death. Many people reached out to us during the unspeakably difficult two years that Rivkah went through chemotherapy, surgery, radiation and other treatments.  But what meant the most to me was how the synagogue community helped our family right after Rivkah died. 

I had known that Jewish tradition involved a washing of the body of the deceased. However, it never occurred to me that I would be utterly unprepared to do this myself, or prepare for this ritual in any way. The day that Rivkah died was the worst day of my life. There are simply no words to describe what it is like to watch as the body of your once warm, joyful daughter — now cold and still — is carried out of your home to the cemetery where she will be laid into the earth the next day. All I could think of was how Rivkah had once said that she wanted a lightweight casket so that if she were really still alive, she could sit up and get out. Looking at her body and knowing that she would be carried out of her comfortable bed and out of the bedroom that she herself had painted teal not long ago, and taken to a cold cemetery, I knew that I was capable of nothing other than despair. Although I had once nursed my daughter as a baby, and made her grilled cheese as a teenager, and even held her in my arms as she died, I knew that on this final night I could not care for her body myself. My grief was too deep.

At that moment, the community did what I could not. Four women from the synagogue whose names I never knew reached out and performed a mitzvah for our family that I will never be able to repay. As a physician, I know that dealing with death and dead bodies – particularly that of a teenagers – is taboo and scary. Four mothers who will never publicly be thanked or recognized overcame their fear, learned the Jewish rituals of Taharah, and performed the ritual cleansing and sanctification of Rivkah before we buried her. They were the last ones to see her body and to say goodbye. It was utterly the lowest point in my life and I was carried forward by people who are still anonymous. Somehow it is reassuring to know that when you really can go no further, your community will reach out and carry you and those that you love.

I never knew, or will know, who those four people are. However, each time that I look at everyone in the synagogue, I imagine that each individual I see is the person who performed the Taharah and gave that final gift to my daughter. Our deepest gratitude and love are with this community always.

       Name and information withheld

 

   

GAMLIEL INSTITUTE COURSES

Please Tell Anyone Who May Be Interested!

       Winter 2016:

STILL TIME – REGISTRATION IS OPEN: THE COURSE BEGINS DECEMBER 6th!

Gamliel Institute Course 1, Chevrah Kadisha History, Origins, & Evolution (HOE) will be offered over twelve weeks on Tuesday evenings from December 6th, 2016 to February 21st, 2017, online.  

ORIENTATION

For those who register, there will be an orientation session on Monday December 5th. It is intended for those unfamiliar with the online course platform used, all who have not taken a Gamliel Institute course recently, and those who have not used an online webinar/class presentation tool in past.

CLASSES

Class times will be all be 5-6:30 pm PST/6-7:30 pm MST/7-8:30 CST/8-9:30 pm EST. [If you are in any other time zone, please determine the appropriate time, given local time and any Daylight Savings Time adjustments that may be necessary (though the course begins after the return in the U.S. to standard time from daylight savings.]

Please note: the class meetings will be online, and will take place on Tuesday evenings (unless a Jewish holiday requires a change of date for a class session).  

DESCRIPTION

The focus of this course is on the development of the modern Chevrah Kadisha, the origins of current practices, and how the practices and organizations have changed to reflect the surrounding culture, conditions, and expectations. The course takes us through the various text sources to seek the original basis of the Chevrah Kadisha, to Prague in the 1600’s, through the importation of the Chevrah Kadisha to America, and all the way to recent days. It is impossible to really understand how we came to the current point without a sense of the history.

SIGN UP NOW TO TAKE THIS COURSE!

There is no prerequisite for this course; you are welcome to take it with no prior knowledge or experience, though interest in the topic is important. Please register, note it on your calendar, and plan to attend the online sessions.

Note that there are registration discounts available for three or more persons from the same organization, and for clergy and students. There are also some scholarship funds available on a ‘need’ basis. Contact us (information below) with any questions.

You can “>jewish-funerals.org/gamreg. A full description of all of the courses is there as well.

For more information, visit the “>Kavod v’Nichum website or on the

Please contact us for information or assistance. info@jewish-funerals.org or j.blair@jewish-funerals.org, or call 410-733-3700, or 925-272-8563.

 

LOOKING FORWARD:

Gamliel Institute will be offering course 4, Nechama (Comfort), online on Tuesday evenings (except on Jewish holidays) in the Spring (starting March 6th, 2017). The orientation session is scheduled for Monday, March 5th, 2017, also at 8 pm EST. Look for information to be forthcoming, or visit the Gamliel.Institute website, or go to the   

COURSE TASTE

If you are not sure if this course is for you, plan to attend the Free one-time Taste of Nechama session on Monday evening, February 13th, 2017 at 8 pm EST. The instructors will offer a few highlights from the materail that the course covers, and let you know what the course includes.

 

DONATIONS:

Donations are always needed and most welcome. Donations support the work of Kavod v’Nichum and the Gamliel Institute, helping us provide scholarships to students, refurbish and update course materials, expand our teaching, support programs such as Taste of Gamliel, provide and add to online resources, encourage and support communities in establishing, training, and improving their Chevrah Kadisha, and assist with many other programs and activities.

You can donate online at You can also become a member (Individual or Group) of Kavod v’Nichum to help support our work. Click  

MORE INFORMATION

If you would like to receive the Kavod v’Nichum Newsletter by email, or be added to the Kavod v’Nichum Chevrah Kadisha & Jewish Cemetery email discussion list, please be in touch and let us know at info@jewish-funerals.org.

You can also be sent an email link to the Expired And Inspired blog each week by sending a message requesting to be added to the distribution list to j.blair@jewish-funerals.org.

Be sure to check out the Kavod V’Nichum website at “>Gamliel.Institute website.

 

RECEIVE NOTICES WHEN THIS BLOG IS UPDATED!

Sign up on our Facebook Group page: just search for and LIKE “>@chevra_kadisha.

To find a list of other blogs and resources we think you, our reader, may find of interest, click on “About” on the right side of the page.There is a link at the end of that section to read more about us.

Past blog entries can be searched online at the L.A. Jewish Journal. Point your browser to  

SUBMISSIONS WELCOME

If you have an idea for an entry you would like to submit to this blog, please be in touch. Email J.blair@jewish-funerals.org. We are always interested in original materials that would be of interest to our readers, relating to the broad topics surrounding the continuum of Jewish preparation, planning, rituals, rites, customs, practices, activities, and celebrations approaching the end of life, at the time of death, during the funeral, in the grief and mourning process, and in comforting those dying and those mourning, as well as the actions and work of those who address those needs, including those serving in Bikkur Cholim, Caring Committees, the Chevrah Kadisha, Shomrim, funeral providers, funeral homes and mortuaries, and operators and maintainers of cemeteries.

 

 

A Letter to the Taharah Team Read More »