fbpx

October 6, 2016

The practicality of vision: A eulogy to Shimon Peres

The legacy of Shimon Peres for many of us who are dedicated to Israel’s future is all about visions and the quest to realize them. The roots of modern Zionism, which so embodied Peres in his life along with Israel’s future, are tied to his capacity to envision. That capacity descended from Herzl to David Ben-Gurion, and from Ben-Gurion to Shimon Peres, and it is now driving a new generation of Israelis. 

Visions in Zionism have proven a powerful mobilizing force. These were visions of new realities that can and should be created, many of which we now take for granted. They include a Jewish state in the land of Israel, the ingathering of the Diasporas, self-defense and self-definition — all of which were far-fetched dreams just a century ago. 

These visions inspired millions to take action: Some sat on a stool and milked cows, while others started a university; some built a kibbutz and others settled in a city; some donated money and others risked their lives. And the sum of this collective action changed Jewish history.  

Visions generate powerful dynamics. They inspire and mobilize people to take action; they energize new coalitions and collaborations among surprising allies; they raise opposition and steer adversity; they reveal resources that were hidden; they evolve. 

Visions are like intellectual startups: they begin in the mind of one person or a small group; they need partnerships, funding and structure; the journey is a grueling marathon; 1 in 100 will affect reality, and 1 in 10,000 will eventually materialize, in defiance of great forces. 

And Peres was a person of visions and perpetual envisioning. The vision of an invincible Israel led to the Dimona project; the vision of peace led to the Oslo process; the vision of an inclusive Israel led to his extensive engagement with Israel’s periphery; and the vision of Israel’s scientific prominence inspired his work on nanotechnology and brain research. 

In the Israeli public sphere, often inundated with cynicism and politicization, Peres was the one outstanding politician who legitimized the art of envisioning and the pursuit of a dream. In his presence or under his auspices, it was allowed and expected to discuss bold moves, to explore ethics and morality, to free oneself from the constraints of the present and to dream big about an Israel that is not only secure and prosperous but also a 21st-century light unto the nations through a model society of growth, development and social justice. 

For me, this is the keystone of his legacy.


Gidi Grinstein is the founder and president of the Reut Group, an Israeli nonprofit strategy and innovation group. He is the author of “Flexigidity: The Secret of Jewish Adaptability.”

The practicality of vision: A eulogy to Shimon Peres Read More »

A Royal Princess Honeymoon: Adventures in the Mediterranean

With all the stress that goes into planning a wedding, figuring out logistics for a honeymoon too can seem like an overwhelming task. A trip with Princess Cruises was the perfect solution for my husband, Karson, and me to enjoy a relaxing but exciting vacation that was a breeze to plan.

Princess offers trips to destinations all over the world, ranging from a few days to multiple weeks. The staff aboard our ship, the Royal Princess, was fully committed to making our experience as comfortable as possible. Whether we wanted an active, busy day or a relaxing one, we had plenty of options to choose from and came back refreshed after a perfect vacation.

Sunset over the Mediterranean

Our seven-day honeymoon cruise traversed the Mediterranean, beginning in Rome and ending in Athens. Karson and I were welcomed to our cabin with chocolate-covered strawberries and a chilled bottle of champagne, the first of many gifts that made our stay aboard the Royal Princess even better.

Pompeii, with Mount Vesuvius in the distance

With stops including Naples, Kotor, and three Greek cities, there were countless historic sites we wanted to visit, but we didn’t want to miss out on the region’s famous cuisine. The excursions offered by Princess allowed us to do both. Highlights from our tours included visiting the archaeological remains of Pompeii, a Roman town destroyed by a volcanic eruption, and participating in a cooking demo in a Greek village on the island of Crete. During the demo, we learned to make dolmades (grape leaves stuffed with rice and vegetables), stuffed peppers, cheese pies, and lukamadas (fried puffs, like unsweetened donuts, served with a topping of honey).

The main square of a Cretan town

We enjoyed some time lounging by the pool and took advantage of a selection of movies available for rental directly in our cabin, as well as “Movies Under the Stars” shown on a big screen on the top deck every day. But we also attended many activities and shows, from trivia to dancing. Couples could take lessons in ballroom dance styles from salsa to waltz, listen to pianists or string quartets while sipping a cocktail in one of the lounges, or watch an illusionist make his assistants appear seemingly out of thin air.

There were many laughs at the live game shows, including one where contestants had to have a three-minute conversation with the host without saying the words yes or no. It was harder than it sounds – only one contestant was successful! Even funnier was a couples trivia challenge where one partner had to answer questions about their husband or wife and then the second partner answered the same set of questions to see if the responses matched.

Dining aboard the ship was consistently excellent. One of the best meals we had was at Sabatini’s, the Italian restaurant aboard the ship. For daily dinners, guests can choose anytime dining or request a specific time and table assignment. Other options, including a steakhouse called Crown Grill, can be reserved for a nominal fee.

Our appetizer at Sabatini’s, fresh roasted vegetables

The main course: zucchini-crusted bass

Napoleon cake for dessert

Our dinner at Sabatini’s began with an appetizer course and a pasta course accompanied by a California chardonnay personally selected by Generoso, the maitre d’. The main courses were fresh, flavorful and beautifully presented – my zucchini-crusted bass  was served with polenta cakes, a plate full of color and texture. My Napoleon cake dessert was a perfect conclusion to the meal, the nutty, crunchy cookie layers contrasting nicely with delicately flavored cream layers.

Daily dinners were only slightly less elaborate, featuring a selection of appetizers – some of my favorites were the refreshingly cool yogurt-based soups – and a rotation of entrees and desserts, along with a list of options that were available daily. Vegetarian options, including pasta and excellent tofu dishes, were always available and clearly labeled.

Events throughout the week made the atmosphere onboard the Royal Princess even more festive. On the first of two formal nights, guests could take a turn at the champagne tower in the main atrium, layer upon layer of glasses carefully set up so that champagne poured into one at the top cascaded into the others. Photographers were available for private photo shoots to commemorate the experience.

A view of Kotor, Montenegro

Windmills at Mikonos

By the end of the trip, we had enjoyed our cruise so much that we were already looking at options for other trips with Princess. We had a wonderful, memorable honeymoon and can’t wait to be back onboard.

IF YOU SAIL:

Princess Cruises

Lead photo courtesy of Princess Cruises.

A Royal Princess Honeymoon: Adventures in the Mediterranean Read More »

To Syria, on Yom Kippur: ‘We have sinned’

We all know the three most important things when assessing real estate: location, location, location. As the ancient Syrian city of Aleppo suffers through the brutality of Russia and Bashar Assad, we should recall that when it comes to American foreign policy, the three most important words are: tradeoffs, tradeoffs, tradeoffs.

At no time of the year should this focus our mind more sharply than at Yom Kippur. We repent and promise — mostly sincerely — to sin no more (even if we know we cannot keep this promise). But what should we do in world politics, where no matter what we do, we will cause — either by commission or omission — suffering and death, perhaps to our loved ones?

U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power told the United Nations Security Council, “What Russia is sponsoring and doing is not counter-terrorism, it is barbarism.” She is correct. The Washington Post editorial board has slammed Power’s boss, President Obama, for doing nothing about it but “hemming and hawing.” But what should we do? Unsurprisingly, the Post said nothing. Because that is where real, and hard, moral choices begin.

Hillary Clinton, Tim Kaine and some Republicans such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham have proposed a no-fly zone. That sounds good, but once it begins, then American pilots will fight against Russian MiGs, and try to evade Syrian anti-aircraft weaponry. That would risk war with a nuclear power and having our pilots shot down. If they get shot down, then of course we must rescue them. That would mean ground troops: perhaps thousands of Americans would be killed. Of course Russia might escalate, which would mean that we would have to escalate as well. That means more troops. They might not, but would you risk it? Is it worth it? If you think so, would you go? Would you tell your children to go?

Perhaps someone else with a greater interest can provide ground troops. But that immediately gets us into trouble as well, for America lacks a strong, sturdy ally to do the fighting for us.

The strongest resistance armies are Sunni jihadists closely aligned with al-Qaida. Those who currently attack President Obama for fecklessness usually point to Potemkin groups like the Free Syrian Army, which never was a real army to begin with, and is merely a collection of dozens of militias, many of them as jihadist as ISIS. Distributing American weapons to shadowy resistance groups usually winds up getting Americans killed, as was revealed a few months ago. We had sent arms to the Syrian resistance through our best Arab ally, Jordan; they wound up on the black market, were used to murder Americans, Jordanian intelligence officials padded their bank accounts. Much of ISIS’ arsenal comprises U.S. weaponry captured from Syrian rebels.

More recently, we found a brighter possibility in the Syrian Democratic Forces, an army of Syrian Kurds, which has fought well. But it has nowhere near the strength to topple Assad, and in any event, there is a bigger problem: Our ostensible NATO ally, Turkey, sees the SDF as its sworn enemy because it is associated with Kurdish separatists in Turkey. Nothing would be more satisfying from a moral perspective than to tell Turkish President Recyyip Tarep Erdogan to perform an unnatural act on himself, but Turkey is a NATO member, and it provides us access to air bases in the fight against ISIS. Are we prepared to sacrifice part of the fight against ISIS to take on Assad?

Perhaps we can only try to rescue more Syrian refugees, saving those who can get out. But the Republican Congress has voted to block all Syrian refugees, attacking the president for the paltry number of 10,000. Hillary Clinton has proposed 65,000 — still a drop in the bucket — and has been lambasted for it by nativist xenophobe Donald Trump. We would need to do far more to make a real difference, and this is my personal choice — but here, too, there are terrible risks. The United States screens potential refugees much better than Germany, but we can hardly rule out the possibility that some potential jihadists will get through our screening process, especially as we increase numbers.

Of course we could simply revert to the old policy expressed by our greatest Secretary of State, John Quincy Adams, who warned that America must not go abroad “in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.” But then we are back where we started, hemming and hawing as we witness a Syrian holocaust.

President John Kennedy said in his inaugural address, “Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty.” Sounds great. But really? Any price? Any burden? Any hardship? It was nonsense when JFK said it, and in light of our disasters in Vietnam and Iraq, now little more than absurd. 

Tradeoffs, tradeoffs, tradeoffs. We can: 1)intervene militarily and risk a wider war with thousands of American casualties; 2) support inadequate Sunni opposition forces and risk not only abject failure but lethal arms falling into ISIS hands and the strengthening of new jihadist forces;  3) support Kurdish opposition forces and risk the fight against ISIS; 4) welcome more refugees but raise a risk — minuscule, but real — of a handful of jihadists getting into the United States; or 5) do nothing and face the cruel judgment of history. (At this time of accounting for our souls, we face the terrifying prospect of making this choice.)

We can, at least, acknowledge that it is a terrible choice, that there are no easy answers. Such moral maturity marks a good way to observe Yom Kippur. But what is your choice? What risks will you take, as a Jew, as a citizen, as someone who aches to live according to the highest ideals of our people and our country? Against these questions, the pieties of the Unetaneh Tokef and the Ashamnu seem serene and cozy by comparison.


Jonathan Zasloff is Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law and a student in the ALEPH ordination programs.

To Syria, on Yom Kippur: ‘We have sinned’ Read More »

Calendar: October 7-13

FRI | OCT 7

“POP FOR THE PEOPLE: ROY LICHTENSTEIN IN L.A.”

Roy Lichtenstein was renowned for his inventive interplay of lines, dots and color, shaping a new form of fine art. Departing from the nonfigurative style of abstract expressionism, the artist depicted everyday objects and drew inspiration from comic books, advertisements and children’s books. “Pop for the People: Roy Lichtenstein in L.A.” ” target=”_blank”>skirball.org.

SAT | OCT 8

“DISTRICT MERCHANTS”

Aaron Posner’s play “District Merchants” takes the themes of Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice” and sets them in Reconstruction-era Washington, D.C., as two merchants, Antoine and Shylock, and their families struggle to forge new indentities for Blacks and Jews in post-Civil War America. The South Coast Repertory production is directed by Michael Michetti. 2 p.m. and 7:45 p.m. South Coast Repertory, 655 Town Center Drive, Costa Mesa. Tickets start at $22. (714) 708-5555. ” target=”_blank”>eventrbite.com.

“TWELVE ANGRY JURORS”

What begins with a jury deliberating an open-and-shut case of murder becomes a detective story with clues that the truth may not be as obvious as it first seemed.
The tension causes each of the jurors to confront their prejudices and preconceptions about the trial, the accused and one another. This play is as relevant now as it was when it was first produced in 1957. Production by the JFed Players Community Theatre Ensemble. 8 p.m. $20; $30 for premium; $10 for students. Clarke Center, 400 Rolyn Place, Arcadia. (626) 445-0810. SUN | OCT 9

YALA HIKE

Join The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles’ Young Adults of Los Angeles (YALA) Hiking Cluster for an unforgettable climb to the Hollywood sign. 10 a.m. Free. Bronson Canyon, 3200 Canyon Drive, Los Angeles. (323) 761-8054. ” target=”_blank”>squadup.com.

“DEFYING GRAVITY”

Award-winning weatherman and comedian Fritz Coleman’s comedic tale explores how to defy the odds, and gravity, after your body parts begin sagging and all of your daily conversations include a medical update. 2 p.m. $35. El Portal Mainstage Theatre, 5269 Lankershim Blvd., North Hollywood. (818) 508-4200. ” target=”_blank”>ivcarts.org.

MON | OCT 10

“ALL OF ME … ALL OF YOU”

Lesley Wolman will perform her cabaret show at the Brandeis Conejo Valley Chapter’s fall luncheon and boutique. There also will be a silent auction. All proceeds will go to medical research for Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and ALS. 10 a.m. $75. Hyatt Westlake Plaza, 880 Westlake Blvd., Westlake Village. (818) 991-2667. TUES | OCT 11

 

” target=”_blank”>skirball.org.

Calendar: October 7-13 Read More »

Review: Bose QuietComfort 35

I’ll admit right off the bat that I’m new to active noise cancelling. I love music, and I love great sound, and I love cancelling background noise, so you’d think I’d be a great fit for the QC-35’s. Up until now, if I wanted to cancel background noise, I’d use in-ear monitor style headphones that you squeeze in your ear to make a seal. They work well, and effectively eliminated most background noise, but I wanted to know if active noise cancelling was any better? I decided to extensively test out the QC-35's to find out.

Short answer: It depends.

My initial reaction when I took out the review unit was a little underwhelming. The QC-35’s are plastic and very light weight. I’m used to headphones in this price range having a more premium feel, a little more weight, nicer materials, a little more solid feeling. However, when I put the headphones on, I immediately understood the advantage of making these headphones as light as possible. They were so damn comfortable, I barely knew they were on at all. Many other headphones start to weigh down on your head after a couple hours, but not these. I can wear them all day long, completely forgetting they’re even on.

Something even more amazing happened when I turned them on.

The world went silent.

I turned them off, and suddenly I was hyper aware of the air conditioner running, of the weird hum coming from the florescent lighting, of all the small little sounds we always hear and never pay attention too. I turned the headphones on again… and all those sounds vanished again. Active noise cancelling is pretty damn amazing.

Aside from a world of silence, when you turn on the headphones, a woman’s voice tells you how much battery power you have left (more than enough) and what devices you’re paired to. You can be paired to two devices simultaneously, though in real world usage switching between those devices was a massive pain and never seemed to work right. I’ve had similar experiences with other bluetooth headphones, so this isn’t a problem unique to Bose. As a general rule, if requiring your headphones to work seamlessly with multiple devices is important to you, bluetooth probably isn’t the way to go. Give me a wire that plugs in. Guaranteed to work every time.

Over the course of the past few weeks, I tested all sorts of music with the QC-35’s, and found the sound quality surprisingly inconsistent. Some recordings sounded pretty decent, some sounded great, and others sounded flat and boring. I found myself quickly switching between multiple headphones to make sure this wasn’t just in my head. It wasn’t. Recordings that sounded great on my go-to headphones sounded flat and lifeless on the 35’s, while other recordings suddenly found a new Bass-ey thump. This inconsistency might have something to with how these headphones need to model and tweak the sound to compensate for any changes due to noise cancelling. I don’t know that this is the case, but it definitely feels that way.

I also found the sound quality and EQ would change as I increased or decreased the volume. Certain frequencies would get boosted as I lowered the volume, others when I raised it. If I wanted to listen to a thumping bass heavy track, I’d crank up the volume, only to hear the bass pull back in the mix. Less than ideal. I think Bose touts this as a feature, to enhance the listening experience. Sometimes it had the desired effect, other times I wished I could turn the feature off.

When the music sounded good, it sounded pretty great, and I’d feel myself getting lost in the tunes. Adele’s breath was right in my ear when listening to her new album. I could feel the bass in Leonard Cohen’s voice on his new single. When when the music didn’t sound good, though, I’d find myself constantly playing with the volume, trying to tweak the sound, rarely with any success. Electronic music seemed to work well most consistently, while other styles of music were hit and miss.

The sound quality, even at its worst is still a step up from the 3 dollar ear buds most people use, but’s also well below the sound quality I’d expect from a headphone in this price range. The sound is also better than other active noise cancelling wireless headphones I’ve tried over the past few weeks, so for this category, these still seem to be best in class. But compared to passive noise cancelling IEMs or similarly priced bluetooth or wired headphones, the sound was usually a notch lower than expected.

The headphones can also be used as a Bluetooth headset for phone calls. The sound quality is excellent in quieter environments or in environments where the background noise is constant and consistent. When I was trying to make a call in a crowded noisy coffee shop though, the microphones seemed to amplify every sound, making me very difficult to understand to the person on the other end of the line. For 95% of phone call situations, these headphones performed well above expectations. I actually found myself reaching for these headphones when my phone would ring because the experience was markedly better than holding the phone to my ear. As a whole, I strongly recommend these for phone calls.

The QC-35’s can be used wired as well, but the 3.5mm cable that came in the box is kind of a joke. It’s ultra flimsy and feels low quality. I know these are meant to be wireless, but for a 350 dollar headphone, they could have included a heavier duty cable. When wired, the QC-35s can be used both with active noise cancelling and without. When wireless, the only option is with active noise cancelling active. There is a slight sound quality difference between active and passive listening, another slight difference between wireless and wired, but most people (including myself) won’t be able to tell the difference in most real world listening situations.

Battery life was pretty amazing. Bose quotes 20 hours for wireless listening, and 40 hours for wired, and in my testing, I usually got a little more than that.

Overall, I liked these headphones for what they were. They’re great for listening to music in noisy environments like on an airplane or train, but less great for listening in quiet places or places with inconsistent noise volumes. In those situations, I’d be much happier with a pair of passive noise cancelling IEMs or just regular headphones.

Active noise cancelling is something that needs getting used to. It can be disorienting at times, and sometimes I wish there was a way to let a little sound in. But that’s just me. I’d strongly recommend these headphones for frequent travelers. I’d be more reluctant to recommend these to people looking for the best sound for their money. For the average person looking for a massive upgrade from their phone ear buds, this could definitely be a great option, especially when paired with the QC-35’s stellar call quality.

The Quietcomfort 35’s were a great introduction into the world of active noise cancellation. I can see headphones like these coming in handy for many noisy situations, but for everyday listening, when I either want the best sound quality possible or the ability to hear what’s going on around me, these may not be my first choice. Having said that — if you want quiet — These are awesome.

Review: Bose QuietComfort 35 Read More »

Jewish organization steps up to aid hurricane victims in Haiti

The humanitarian organization American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC) is providing medical assistance, basic provisions and other aid to Hurricane Matthew victims in Haiti.

“Our response to this crisis is especially poignant during the Jewish High Holidays, when we examine carefully our actions in the last year and recommit to our obligation as individuals and a global people to aid those in dire need,” JDC CEO Allan Gill said in an Oct. 5 statement. 

The hurricane made landfall Tuesday in Haiti and resulted in, among other things, the collapse of a critical bridge that connects the capital, Port-au-Prince, with southern Haiti, the hardest-hit area of the storm, which has affected the transport of emergency goods, according to various news reports.

Ariel Dominique, director of community affairs at the Haitian Embassy in Washington, D.C., citing the latest statistics from the Haitian Ministry of Interior, said on Thursday afternoon that 108 people have been confirmed dead, 28,000 houses have been damaged and 21,000 people are living in shelters as a result of the hurricane.

“The devastation in the south had homes and infrastructure collapsing,” Michael Geller, director of media relations at JDC, said in a phone interview from New York. “A very big concern is farmland and livestock supplies that were completely destroyed. There has been quite a bit of reporting of livestock put into shelters and then the shelters collapsed.”

JDC assistance to Haiti dates back to the Holocaust, when the JDC provided relief to Eastern European refugees who were fleeing Nazi persecution and were welcomed in the island nation, according to Geller.

“We’re very proud of the history and the role Haiti played,” he said.

Today, the world Jewish community — Israel, in particular — maintains warm relations with Haiti, which supported Israel’s bid for statehood in the United Nations in 1948. In 2010, the Israel Defense Forces provided extensive relief to Haitians in the aftermath of a devastating earthquake in the Caribbean region.

A partner agency of the Jewish Federations of North America, JDC is providing assistance in more than 70 Jewish communities worldwide. In addition to disaster relief efforts, “our main focus is helping Jews in Jewish communities,” Geller said.

JDC does not not have any representatives currently on the ground in Haiti but is providing aid through several organizations it describes as partners, including Heart to Heart International, which began operations in Haiti following the 2010 earthquake there; Prodev, a Haitian-led nonprofit focused on education; and Partners in Health, known in Haiti as Zanmi Lasante, which operates clinics and hospitals in Haiti.

Hurricane Matthew also has struck Cuba and the Bahamas, and was threatening Florida, South Carolina and the Atlantic Coast of the United States, as of Thursday afternoon. The National Hurricane Center described Matthew on Thursday as a Category 4 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale, which says Category 4 storms cause “catastrophic damage.”

For information about how to contribute to the JDC effort in Haiti, visit jdc.org.

Jewish organization steps up to aid hurricane victims in Haiti Read More »

Hebrew Word of the Week: sliHah

A major concept of the High Holy Days is forgiveness. What do we do when we forgive? The English word “forgive” (German vergeben) meant “give wholeheartedly, grant, allow; remit (a debt completely), pardon (an offense); give up (with no grudge)” and “give in marriage (graciously).” 

The Hebrew salaH “forgive, be indulgent toward” is perhaps related to Semitic root s-l-y “toss aside, shake off, make light, forget about (a grudge, sin)”* and perhaps s-l-l “lift up, pave, cover smoothly,” which is semantically similar to kipper “cover; atone” and nasa’ “lift up, remove (sin).” 

Other derived words: God is known as sallaH “ready to forgive” (Psalms 86:5) and eloah sliHot “God of forgivings” (Nehemiah 9:17 and High Holy Days prayer book); salHan/solHan “forgiver”; salHani “forgiving”; saliaH “forgivable; fit for pardoning”; and sliHot “penitential prayers.”  

*Compare the tashlich ritual to “cast away (sins)”; Judeo-Arabic of Baghdad: ishlikhu binTilah, “cast it away, forget it (at the ritual hand-washing).”


Yona Sabar is a professor of Hebrew and Aramaic in the department of Near Eastern Languages & Cultures at UCLA.

Hebrew Word of the Week: sliHah Read More »

Shimon Peres: To be a Jew

May 26, 2003

Excerpted from: “I Am Jewish: Personal Reflections Inspired by the Last Words of Daniel Pearl” (Jewish Lights, 2004, now Turner Publishing). The book won the National Jewish Book Award.

The language of the Jewish people has no brother; its religion, no sister; its history, no family. The question I ask myself is, why? And the answer is not simple. Let’s examine, for a start, the matter of the language. It is interesting to note that it is the only ancient language that was revived in the Mediterranean. The Egyptians do not speak in the language of hieroglyphics; the Syrians do not speak Assyrian; the Iraqis do not speak Babylonian; the Greeks do not speak ancient Greek; and the Italians do not speak Roman. 

Israel speaks Hebrew. The language of the Bible as it was spoken in biblical days. In truth, this language is philosophical in nature. It is very precise, uncluttered by too many complex grammatical rules. The rationale on which the Hebrew language is founded rests on two basic time spans: past and future. Not much time is wasted on the present. Generally, reference is made to things past. Or things future. The present, the now, mainly relates to the Creator, who is unseen, in a place unknown, but whose Divine Presence imbues our every action, our every thought.

What I find riveting, as a Jew, is the enormous tension, or colossal bridge, that straddles the ancient past, deep, obdurate, rebellious, and the future, demanding, unpredictable, conditional, regenerated, revolutionary, and even somewhat brazen. I am moved by this tension, by the fact that I am a son of this people, a nation that is adamant about remembering the past, inspired by its heritage, receptive to change, undaunted by the great prophecy that forges the destiny of the Jewish people, as in the words of the verse: “old from new produce.” I sometimes feel as one that must wander on foot along the lanes of history and soar on the wings of my imagination to a new destination; this destination might be distant, but the objective might in turn give birth to yet another new destination.

I feel that this tension prevents me from sinking into a sense of complacency. For creative faculties, and revolutionary deeds, emanate from a feeling of imperfection. They stem from the need to break new ground, seek an as yet uncharted path, that exists in some undefined location. Something, that is fueled by ancient values and new challenges, and provides a ray of hope to every person who wishes to climb to an ever higher peak. I feel like a man who hungers for such a goal. And Judaism generates my thirst. Judaism is not a religion, it is a faith. It is not governed by any hierarchy imposed by the Almighty God, and all men, who in any case have been created in His image, can communicate directly with him. As such, there is no need to separate faith from state. The essence of a Jewish state is that it is, first and foremost, a state that is founded on faith. A state that is distinguished by spiritual faith, and not necessarily a state that is controlled by a religious apparatus.

We possess a Written Gospel and an Oral Gospel — we have a treasure that is written and treasures that are oral. But there is one basic document on which Judaism hinges: the Ten Commandments. This very document that contains less than three hundred words forged a union: it encapsulates the fundamental principles of the Jewish people, but also constitutes the cornerstone of Western Civilization. Thus, not only did faith and nationality become interwoven into a unique tapestry, but nation and universality too flowed together into one.

The basic laws, not to kill, not to lie, not to torture others, not to institutionalize slavery, not to discriminate against servants, not to engage in idolatry, are all precepts that have been embraced by all of the enlightened world. They have been included, in one way or another, in the New Testament and the Koran. Judaism was first to contest idolatry and slavery. It also spoke against superiority of race, color, nationality or man. If superiority does exist, it is in matters of the spirit and not in the dominions of power. There is no superior being; there is only an Almighty God. A Divine Presence whose face cannot be seen, but who nevertheless resides inside each and every one of us, the conscience that gives us no peace. Sovereignty is moral, priority is intellectual, equality is human.

Our history has not been paved with joyful events. Quite the contrary. It has been a history of trials and tribulations, and the price we paid put faith to the test. I do not think that Judaism simply consists of a collection of rigid laws to be accepted and hallowed. It represents an assortment of ethnic challenges, that spur man’s discontent and fuels his perennial quest for perfection. This ideal does not come attired in a single garment, nor is it a final goal. It can be compared to Jacob’s ladder — you climb one step after the next and gaze at the sky. In the awareness that it is distant and unattainable. Yet the process of climbing the steps makes you feel you are in communion with God.

Naturally, I am a willing captive of the history of our people. Not that it has been free of mistakes. While we are a stricken people that has known destruction and the Holocaust, we have nonetheless experienced amazing peaks. The chronicle of the Jewish people is distinguished by spiritual tenacity and political aggression, like the bush that burnt with fire, yet the bush was not consumed. This can serve as an explanation of why the Jewish people possessed so many prophets, priests (Cohen), judges, visionaries and so very few statesmen. Prophets and priests do not seek compromises in life, but yearn to rise above them, while statesmen have to make concessions regarding material alternatives and lofty ambitions. And a great number of Jews have always feared that compromises would lead them to compromise with their own selves. Functional mollification instead of spiritual enhancement.

Photo by Nati Harnik/GPO/Reuters

Possibly, if Judaism was more conciliatory towards Jesus, Christianity would never have been born. Some contend that Christianity is the consequence of a Jewish mistake. And had it not been made, today we would have counted hundreds of millions of Jews, instead of only 14 million. We paid dearly for our obstinacy, but maybe this price enabled us to take huge steps forward in the annals of mankind, and while physically bruised and wounded, we have remained spiritually whole. And despite the fact that our body practically did not develop, it nevertheless managed to carry on its shoulders the weight of our faith, whose power is manifestly greater than the size of the shoulders that support it.

We knew destruction and we knew redemption. I do not know whether the destruction was necessary, but the redemption has always been a miracle.

My biography as a Jew is imbued with awe and reverence for Jewish history. I was born in a small town in White Russia. It was totally Jewish. Not a single Goy lived there. Therefore, I experienced the taste of Jewish isolation from the moment I was born. Two synagogues graced the town, built from wood, as well as the “Tarbut” (culture) school, whose classes were conducted in Hebrew. My forefathers — grandfather and grandmother — were extremely religious. My parents were already secular. The influence that had the most impact on me in my childhood was my grandfather, may his soul rest in peace, Rabbi Zvi Melzer. He taught me, when I was 5 years old, a page of Gemara, every day. I used to go along with him to synagogue, and on Yom Kippur he led the prayers (he had an impressive voice), and when it was time for Kol Nidre, all the worshippers, and I among them, spread the Talit over our heads. It was then that I was struck by a great sense of fear, because I suddenly found myself alone, with all my sins, in front of the Almighty God.

My mother, who was a librarian, introduced me to Shalom Aleichem on the one hand, and to Dostoyevsky, on the other. Already as a youngster I read “Crime and Punishment,” and again I was overcome with fear — this time out of anxiety for interrelations between people. Shalom Aleichem calmed the agitation with a wise smile that stemmed from the Jewish soul.

Half the town’s population emigrated to Eretz Israel, including many members of my family. The second half was annihilated by the Nazis. A quarter of the town’s residents, with my grandfather among them, were packed into the synagogue, and while wearing their Talit, were set to fire and burned alive by the Nazis.

I was 11 when I immigrated to Israel. I was captivated by the blue skies, the Hebrew letters and sunburnt pioneers. I wanted to resemble them. I was sent to the Ben Shemen Youth Village to study agriculture and make ready to become a kibbutznik. I spent some time in two kibbutzim, the one in the Jezreel Valley and the other in Lower Galilee. I learned how to reap wheat and also to become a shepherd. My life seemed perfect. Then the riots started, and the war, and I was caught up by them, and into them, drawn into completely new and different worlds.

When I look back, I am able to see how my life, and the life of the Jewish people, intermingled. The first chapter in the modern history of the Jewish people started to unfold at the end of the 19th century, when Jews emigrated from eastern Europe in large numbers, escaping from the threat of the new Russian Tsar — Nicholas II — who rose to power in 1882. At the same time, the voice of Herzl became heard, proclaiming a Jewish homeland. Herzl’s vision ignited the enthusiasm of many Jews, but only a very few responded in practice. Of 3 million Jews who left Eastern Europe between 1882 and 1914 (when World War I broke out), only 50,000 immigrated to Israel. What a historical mistake! And despite everything, even this meager wave of immigration exercised a miracle: For the first time in history, a people who left, or were banished from, their country, was revived and started gathering in the land of their forefathers. Never had such an extraordinary event been witnessed until then, nor has one taken place since, with any other people. From dispersion across the four corners of the world, to reunion in the land of their fathers, from the bondage of exile to the freedom of a homeland.

And then the second chapter opened — in the first half of the 20th century — when the Jewish people that had gathered in the Land of Israel, soon understood that it could not live, as it had done when in exile — from luftgeschaften — makeshift business dealings. They had to dig into the soil and cultivate the land with their own hands. Except that the newcomers had no previous agricultural experience, and the land to which they had come, had no agricultural resources. Eretz Israel was desolate, devastated, and its land reluctant and tired. A land with practically no water. Despite the lack of experience, and infertility of the soil, the standard of agriculture that developed in Israel is today perceived by many to be the highest in the world. Not only did the desert bloom, but new and amazing cooperative frameworks were built, such as the kibbutz and moshav, that encapsulated a distinctive type of social phenomenon never previously seen.

That was the second miracle.

And as the barren land was being tilled, war broke out. Israel was attacked by forces that were far superior — both in numbers and in arms — whereas the barely born state was desperately short of arms, and its army practically non-existent. The land of the Jews was attacked five times, and all five ended in victory. Once again, a people lacking in military tradition, and in the face of an unequal balance of strategic military power, Israel created an army that, in this case as well, was recognized as one of the best in the world.

That was the third miracle.

And now, the homeland of the Jews is facing its fourth challenge. To demonstrate its prowess in the field of science and technology. Without a doubt, the Jewish people are rich in history and poor in land, and will be unable to sustain themselves unless the benefits of science and technology are duly garnered to their best advantage. The brain needs to compensate for the meagerness of territory.

I hope we shall see a fourth miracle.

I have been witness to the arrival of olim — the new immigrants — and their absorption, unique and unsurpassed among any other people: fair-haired immigrants from Russia mingling with dark-skinned immigrants from Ethiopia. Bearded Jews with skull caps and Jews in sleeveless vests that bare their well-developed muscles. I could distinctly feel the undercurrent of excitement as the drama of a people in the making was unfolding before our very eyes.

I reaped wheat, led herds to pasture, constructed houses, lived, together with my companions, in tents open to the wind, and felt I was a participant in the building process of a state. I saw how a desert assumed a green mantle. Later, I was appointed to central defense-related positions and understood how power could be built and acts of heroism mobilized — indeed, how something could be created from nothing.

I saw the ploughs and I saw the rifles. And nowadays, I see modern microscopes in universities that shed light on atoms invisible to the naked eye, making it possible to build a whole new world. What could be more fulfilling, more riveting, more just, than to be a son of such a people? Truthfully, there were moments when it seemed that all was lost, that everything had vanished. And then there were other instances, when it appeared that all the problems had been resolved. Yet the former did not happen, and neither did the latter. The road ahead is still very long and hard, but inspiring nevertheless. We stopped being slaves in Egypt’s house and moved into a home that is independent, democratic and Jewish — in our land.

What propels us? Not marshals and not religion. We are propelled by tremendous faith that tells us that a new genesis is possible, one that will create a better world inhabited by better people: created in the image of God and lovers of mankind.

I feel like a man who has donned biblical sandals and is moving forward with a people inspired by its faith, part of a process of renewal and revival, walking on without fear. A people that fights without despairing, remembering and advancing at one and the same time.

Shimon Peres: To be a Jew Read More »

J Street cautions Schumer on Iran deal

J Street, likely to emerge after the 2016 election as a major force within the Democratic Party, is expecting from Senator Chuck Schumer to fall in line with supporters of the Iranian nuclear deal once he assumes leadership of the Democratic Caucus in the U.S. Senate.

“Senator Schumer understands that he’s very much in the minority in his own party and he would have a strong uphill battle were he to try to do anything that would actually undermine the deal,” J Street President Jeremy Ben-Ami told Jewish Insider on Wednesday.

“In the final vote, there were only four Democratic senators who did not vote to support the deal,” he asserted. “Senator Schumer did not work hard to rally opposition. He stated his personal view on this and he voted against it, but he was also very understanding and realistic that 90 percent of his colleagues in the Democratic caucus were in favor of the deal; sided with the president, with Secretary [Hillary] Clinton] and Senator [Tim] Kaine.”

In a recent speech at the Israeli American Council National Conference in DC, Schumer “>signed a letter to Senator Mitch McConnell asking that he “prioritize” a clean extension of the Iran Sanctions Act during the Senate’s end-of-year session. The extension, as proposed by the senior Democrats, would run through 2026. “It is essential that Congress keep Iran’s feet to the fire to make sure they do not violate the JCPOA. This bill would provide the sanction authority that helps us do just that,” Schumer said in July.

According to Ben-Ami, the reauthorization of the Iran Sanctions Act for ten years is something J Street can live with. “It is not viewed by us as a step to undermine the deal,” he said. “That in and of itself is not evidence of an intent on part of the senator to use his potential position (as Senate Majority Leader) in a way that might undermine the deal, in the years going forward.”

On Wednesday, J Street kicked off a “>earlier this year that the group has decided to seize the opportunity to expand its control and influence within the Democratic Party after scoring a victory on the Iran deal. “We see this as a unique opportunity to go on the offense and prove that standing up for a diplomacy first approach – which has been proven to be in the best interest of the U.S. and Israel – is not just smart policy but also savvy politics,” Shnider emphasized.

The pro-peace group was “>speech at the annual J Street gala in April. “Your organization played a critical role in mustering the support at home to get that deal through the United States Congress… “Thank you, thank you, thank you for your effort. You have made the world a little bit safer.”

Promising to expand the national campaign if needed, Ben-Ami stressed, “For us, this political fight represents the second chapter in the struggle to uphold the Iran nuclear agreement—and one that is every bit as important as the initial policy win. We need now to put candidates in office not only to defend against ongoing efforts to sink the deal in Congress, but also to protect the important precedent its passage set for pro-diplomacy-first policies going forward.”

J Street cautions Schumer on Iran deal Read More »

Don’t waste your time: The Israeli rabbinate has already lost its battles

The new survey by Hiddush – an organization dedicated to freedom of religion in Israel – gives many reasons for hope. It gives hope that Israel will gradually improve itself – and also gives hope that the level of hysteria concerning state-religion relations in Israel will be reduced. In fact, it ought to be reduced, as the survey proves that most of the great problems are going to be solved without much need for aggressive intervention. In other words: save the campaigns for something else – the Israeli rabbinate is crumbling anyways.

Take a look, for example, at the percentage of Jewish Israelis who’d rather have a non-Orthodox marriage ceremony. Last year, 63% of Israelis still said they wanted an Orthodox marriage even in case all marriages will be legally equal. This year, the percentage of Israelis insisting on Orthodox marriage declined by a whopping 10% to 53%. Among secular Israelis, almost eighty percent prefer other-than-Orthodox marriages (78%).

But Hiddush updated their survey this year and added an interesting question. Following the one about one’s preference if all marriages were equally legal, they then asked what they prefer in the current legal situation – that is, when only Orthodox marriages through the rabbinate are legally recognized by the state. The answer: 33% would still opt out of the Orthodox arrangement. These are Israelis who prefer to A. have civil marriage outside of Israel, or B. cohabite without official marriage. There is no great surprise in this. Alternative marriages are becoming the preferred choice for many Israelis. In other words: Israelis, rather than fight the rabbinate, choose to ignore it.

This is a healthy attitude, one that circumvents the political obstacles to changing the system in an up-to-bottom kind of way – that is, convincing the Knesset, changing the laws, battling with the Haredi establishment, going to courts. Instead, the Israeli public chooses to follow a path that is inherently Jewish. Jewish law urges never to commit to a decree that the public cannot tolerate (see Talmud, Avoda Zara 36a: We make no decree upon the community unless the majority are able to abide by it). And make no mistake: it is not Orthodox marriage that the public rebels against – it is the interpretation of the rabbinate that it rejects. To put it somewhat differently: a significant portion of the public rejects Orthodoxy because of the rabbinate, and not the rabbinate because of Orthodoxy.

It is interesting to compare two of the answers in the survey: the one about marriage and the one about the Western Wall compromise and Israel’s inability to implement a decision that was already made by the government. This morning, a number of organizations appealed to the High Court in their quest to force the government into implementing the compromise. The public surely supports the appeal – in the survey 66% support the compromise, including 22% of religious Israelis (not Haredi). Morevoer, 55% of Israelis say that they would use the non-Orthodox platform near the Kotel (either exclusively or alternately) if and when it is finally established.

But there is a marked difference between the issue of the Kotel and that of marriage. The support for the Kotel is mostly theoretical, because many Israelis rarely, if ever, go there and hence do not care much about the arrangement available to visitors. Yes, they’d support the least Orthodox suggestion because of their dislike of the Orthodox establishment, but don’t expect them to be invested in such a cause.

Marriage, on the other hand, is important. A marriage ceremony is a meaningful event in every person’s life, and that is why we see a growing number of Israelis not just making a stand in answering a survey the right way, but also making a stand by taking action. That is essentially what the Haredi rabbinate fails to understand. It can toy with many things as long as these thing don’t really matter – as long as these things are not real interruptions to people’s lives. But when the rabbinate becomes an obstacle to the way of life Israelis appreciate and want, it will be cast aside and turned extraneous.

Of course, such things do not happen in one day. There is a process of gradual change. And don’t believe it when people tell you that Israel is becoming more religious, or a theocracy, or use some bombastic terms to describe the terrible religious regime under which Israelis find themselves. The opposite is true: the percentage of Israelis who support public transportation on Shabbat climbed from 58% in 2010 to 73% today. Transportation, unlike the Kotel compromise, is an essential service. Thus, the more Israelis feel uncomfortable with the current arrangement, the less it will be possible for the political system, the rabbinate, the Haredi parties, and all of the other real or imaginary demons to prevent change.

Don’t waste your time: The Israeli rabbinate has already lost its battles Read More »