fbpx

February 26, 2016

Trump and Obama

Last night’s debate pyrotechnics probably confirm that nothing can change the Trumpian trajectory of the GOP nomination contest.

Again, Marco Rubio demonstrated that he has the talent, but not the timing, to break through, and may not be quite ready yet for prime time. Ted Cruz may win Texas, but that’s about it. Trump was bloodied but unbowed in his monumental ignorance, arrogance, and mendacity.

Trump is incomprehensible without Obama preceding him. They have in common a cult of personality fueled by dazzled worshippers and a corrupt media seduced or frightened into fawning compliance.

There’s a big difference, however. Obama will go down in history—certainly not as another Lincoln or FDR or even Ronald Reagan—but as a consequential president if not quite the “transformative” one he aspired to be. The reason is that he has an ideological core that guides and limits his pragmatism and opportunism, pointing him consistently in the direction of a redistributionist-regulatory state at home and abroad a retreat from the role of global superpower.

Obama is open to many criticisms, but being “unJewish” is not a valid one. In fact, his broad purposes, I would argue, continue to resonate near perfectly with the political predilections of a majority of American Jews, especially the younger cohort, though not Israelis.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, has no ideological core to delimit his unappeasable hunger for self-aggrandizement. In Freudian terms, Obama may be viewed as a narcissist—but like many narcissists, he has a strong superego, i.e., an ideology, that governs what he does. Trump is instead an unrestrained egomaniac who’s much more dangerous than a garden variety narcissist.

Trump’s true believers are like Mickey Mouse Club members who believe that every day is Wednesday when “everything is possible.” Their desires are not constructive; instead, they yearn for creative destruction of the current political order to be replaced by bread and circuses flattering their flawed egos. Bernie Sanders gives lip service to the notion of a “political revolution.” If a real one occurred, Sanders would be among the first casualties. The Trump folk really want one, at whatever the cost.

If Trump’s elected, however, there may not be any Wednesdays in the week for them to revel in. Ted Cruz would actually try to reverse the Obama Era. Trump won’t even try. Instead, he’ll seek to rebrand it as Trumpian. If he succeeds, his reign might provide a necessary interregnum for the progressive Democrats. After a pause that refreshes, they would be well positioned to resume power and take up where Obama leaves off.

But the other possibility is that, despite or because of Trump’s compulsive propensities for unscrupulous deal making (Israel beware!), things fall apart during his presidency. Indeed, a series of dark Wednesdays where everything bad is possible could occur at home or abroad. To mix metaphors, chickens might not come to roost, but “black swan” catastrophes could happen.

If that happens, what comes next may not be an Obama retread but someone who really acts out the rage to restore lost status welling up from  the region of the heart of darkness where the souls of our legion of Trump losers currently reside.

Trump and Obama Read More »

Rosner’s Torah Talk: Parashat Ki Tisa with Rabbi Gerald Skolnik

Our guest this week is Rabbi Gerald C. Skolnik, spiritual leader of The Forest Hills Jewish Center in New York. Rabbi Skolnik was ordained by the Jewish Theological Seminary in 1981. Immediately upon his ordination, he served as Assistant Rabbi under the late Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser for almost three years. With Rabbi Bokser’s death in 1984, Rabbi Skolnik assumed the rabbinic leadership of the congregation, and has served in that capacity ever since. In addition to his responsibilities at The Forest Hills Jewish Center, Rabbi Skolnik is involved in numerous communal activities. He is the immediate past President of the Rabbinical Assembly, a Vice President of the Zamir Choral Foundation, a Vice President of MERCAZ, the Zionist arm of the Conservative movement, and a member of the Board of Directors of the Masorti Foundation. A past president of the Commission on Synagogue Relations of UJA-Federation, he also serves on the Board of Trustees of the Solomon Schechter School of Queens, and the Board of Governors of the New York Board of Rabbis.

This Week’s Torah Portion – Parashat Ki Tisa (Exodus 30:11-34:35) – begins with the census of the people of Israel and with further instructions concerning the Tabernacle and the Shabbat. The portion then proceeds to tell the story of the Golden Calf, Moses' plea to god, the splitting of the Tablets into two, and the giving of the second tablets. Our discussion focuses on the dialogue between God and Moses in the aftermath of the sin of the golden calf, when Moses asks God “Show me your ways,” and on God’s relationship with Moses in general.

Our past discussions on Ki Tisa:

Rabbi Gabe Greenberg on the breaking of the First Tablets and the notion of the Second Tablets

Rabbi Rachel Ain on the reason behind the people of Israel’s discontent and on the possible role of Moses' leadership in their sin.

Rosner’s Torah Talk: Parashat Ki Tisa with Rabbi Gerald Skolnik Read More »

Rubio, Trump spar over Israel, peace process

Donald Trump’s stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is “anti-Israel,” Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio charged during a live televised presidential debate on Thursday.

“You might not know this but the position you are taking is an anti-Israel position,” Rubio told Trump, referring to his comments during a town hall event last week, in which he suggested that he would take a ‘neutral’ approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. “A deal between Israel and the Palestinians, given the current makeup of the Palestinians, is not possible.”

“I will be on Israel’s side every day,” the Florida Senator pledged.

Trump countered the charge by explaining that the approach he took is an effort to broker a peace settlement between Israel and the Palestinians. “It serves no purpose to say you have a good guy and a bad guy. I am very pro-Israel but it doesn’t do any good to be demeaning the neighbors,” he said. “I would love to do something to negotiate peace for Israel and the neighbors.”

“As president there is nothing that I would rather do than to bring peace to Israel and it’s neighbors generally,” he continued. “Now, I may not be successful in doing it. It’s probably the toughest ‘negotiation anywhere in the world of any kind. I would love to do something with regard to negotiating peace, finally, for Israel and for their neighbors. And I can’t do that as well — as a negotiator, I cannot do that as well if I’m taking big, big sides. With that being said, I am totally pro-Israel.”

“Donald might able to build condos in the Palestinian areas, but this is not a real estate deal,” Rubio hit back.

Cruz, on his part, slammed Trump for contributing to candidates who were not strongly pro-Israel throughout his business career. “If you care about Israel, you don’t write checks to politicians that are undermining Israel,” Cruz said. “If I’m president, America will stand unapologetically with the nation of Israel.”

“There is nobody on this stage that has done more for Israel than I have. You are all talk and no action,” Trump responded.

Retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson also chimed in on the subject after whining, “I didn’t get asked about Israel.”

“When I was there several months ago, I talked to a lot of people. I couldn’t find a single one who didn’t think that we had turned our backs on Israel,” said Carson. “You know, they are a strategic partner for us but also recognize that we have a Judeo Christian foundation, and the last thing we need to do is to reject Israel. It doesn’t mean that we can’t be fair to other people. We can always be fair to other people, but, you know, it’s like when you have a child, you know, you want to be fair to all the children around but you have a special attention for your own child.”

Read a full transcript of the exchange on Israel below:

Trump: I was the Grand Marshall down 5th Avenue a number of years ago for the Israeli Day Parade, I have very close ties to Israel. I’ve received the Tree of Life Award and many of the greatest awards given by Israel.

As president, however, there’s nothing that I would rather do to bring peace to Israel and its neighbors generally. And I think it serves no purpose to say that you have a good guy and a bad guy.

Now, I may not be successful in doing it. It’s probably the toughest negotiation anywhere in the world of any kind. OK? But it doesn’t help if I start saying, “I am very pro-Israel, very pro, more than anybody on this stage.” But it doesn’t do any good to start demeaning the neighbors, because I would love to do something with regard to negotiating peace, finally, for Israel and for their neighbors.

And I can’t do that as well — as a negotiator, I cannot do that as well if I’m taking big, big sides. With that being said, I am totally pro-Israel.

Cruz: Well, this is another area on which Donald agrees with Hillary Clinton and on which I disagree with them both strongly. Both Donald and Hillary Clinton want to be neutral, to use Donald’s word, between Israel and the Palestinians.

Let me be clear. If I’m president, America will stand unapologetically with the nation of Israel.

And the notion of neutrality is based upon the left buying into this moral relativism that is often pitched in the media. Listen, it is not equivalent. When you have terrorist strapping dynamite around their chest, exploding and murdering innocent women and children, they are not equivalent to the IDF officers protecting Israel. And I will not pretend that they are.

Just today, Iran announced they’re going to pay $7,000 to each suicide bomber. And I would note, missing from Donald’s answer was anything he has done in his nearly 70 years of living defending Israel. I have over and over again led the fight to defend Israel, to fight for Israel. And this — if you want to know who will stand with Israel, we ought to start with who has stood with Israel when the heat was on.

Trump: Well, I can only say — look, I can only say I’ve been a big contributor to Israel over the years. I’ve received many, many awards from Israel, as I’ve said before. I have a great relationship with Israel. And I’m going to keep it that way. And if I could bring peace, that would be a fantastic thing. It would be one of my greatest achievements as president.

Kasich: Well, I mean, well, I was in Congress for 18 years on the Defense Committee. And then, you know, after 9/11, the secretary of defense called me in to help out with some things. And I’ve been a supporter of Israel — a strong supporter of Israel longer than anybody on this stage. I didn’t give as much money as Donald gave, but I’ve been standing with the Israelis for a very long time.

And frankly, I think the problem we have in foreign policy right now, Wolf, is that we are not certain with who we stand with. Our allies are not sure what to make of us, and our enemies are moving. And one — are moving because they’re not sure what we will do.

It’s a very interesting development here within the 24 hours. We said to the South Koreans that we would give them the high altitude defense system. It really rattled the Chinese, and for the first time since we took positive action, the Chinese are beginning to take action against North Korea.

When we stand firm and we let the world know who we’re with, who we stand for, and we bring our allies together, that is the road forward.

Rubio: I don’t know if Donald realizes this. I’m sure it’s not his intent perhaps. But the position you’ve taken is an anti-Israel position. And here’s why. Because you cannot be an honest broker in a dispute between two sides in which one of the sides is constantly acting in bad faith. The Palestinian Authority has walked away from multiple efforts to make peace, very generous offers from the Israels. Instead, here’s what the Palestinians do. They teach their four- year-old children that killing Jews is a glorious thing. Here’s what Hamas does. They launch rockets and terrorist attacks again Israel on an ongoing basis. The bottom line is, a deal between Israel and the Palestinians, given the current makeup of the Palestinians, is not possible.

And so the next president of the United States needs to be someone like me who will stand firmly on the side of Israel. I’m not — I’m not going to sit here and say, “Oh, I’m not on either side.” I will be on a side. I will be on Israel’s side every single day because they are the only pro-American, free enterprise democracy in the entire Middle East.

Trump: I’m a negotiator. I’ve done very well over the years through negotiation. It’s very important that we do that. In all fairness, Marco is not a negotiator. I watched him melt down and I’ll tell you, it was one of the saddest things I’ve ever seen. He’s not going down — excuse me…

Rubio: He thinks a Palestinian is a real estate deal.

Trump: Wait a minute, and these people may even be tougher than Chris Christie. OK?

Rubio: The Palestinians are not a real estate deal, Donald.

Trump: OK, no, no, no — a deal is a deal. Let me tell you that. I learned a long time ago.

Rubio: A deal is not a deal when you’re dealing with terrorists. Have you ever negotiated with terrorists?

Trump: You are not a negotiator. You are not a negotiator. And, with your thinking, you will never bring peace. You will never bring peace…

Rubio: Donald, might be able to build condos for Palestinians and Arabs, but it’s not a real estate deal…

Trump: Excuse me, I want to be able to bring peace. He will never be able to do it. I think I may be able to do it, although I will say this. Probably the toughest deal of any kind is that particular deal.

Carson: As far as Israel is concerned, you know, when I was there several months ago, I talked to a lot of people. I couldn’t find a single one who didn’t think that we had turned our backs on Israel. You know, they are a strategic partner for us but also recognize that we have a Judeo Christian foundation, and the last thing we need to do is to reject Israel. It doesn’t mean that we can’t be fair to other people. We can always be fair to other people, but, you know, it’s like when you have a child, you know, you want to be fair to all the children around but you have a special attention for your own child.

Another exchange took place over Israel further on in the debate:

Cruz: Another example is John Kerry. John Kerry — Senator Rubio voted to confirm John Kerry as secretary of State. I voted against him. And Donald Trump supported John Kerry against George W. Bush in 2004, gave him a check. And John Kerry has been the most anti-Israel secretary of State this country has ever seen.

Trump: As far as John Kerry is concerned, there has been no tougher critic of this man, I think he negotiated one of the worst deals in the history of our country, the Iran deal, where they get their $150 billion and all of the other things that take place.

It is a disaster for this country, and speaking of Israel, it’s a disaster for Israel. I’m no fan of John Kerry.

Cruz: I’ll give one more example on Israel. When the Obama administration canceled civilian air flights into the national of Israel, when Hamas was raining rockets down on them, I publicly asked, is this an economic boycott against Israel?

The next day Michael Bloomberg, another New York billionaire, got on a plane, a commercial flight, and flew to Israel from London. Together the heat and light that was put on the State Department was so great that within 36 hours they lifted the ban on air flights into Israel.

During that entire battle, and indeed during every battle on Israel the natural question is, where was Donald? If this is something he cares about, why has he supported anti-Israel politicians from Jimmy Carter to Hillary Clinton to John Kerry for four decades?

If you care about Israel, you don’t write checks to politicians who are undermining Israel. Instead you stand and support the national security of America and the alliance with Israel.

Trump: There is nobody on this stage that has done more for Israel than I have. Nobody. You might say, you might talk, you’re politicians, all talk, no action.

I’ve been watching it all my life. You are all talk and no action.

Rubio, Trump spar over Israel, peace process Read More »

Palestinian wanted by Israel found dead in Bulgaria

A Palestinian terrorist who escaped prison in Israel was found dead at the Palestinian mission in Bulgaria, where he was living to avoid extradition.

The body of Omar Nayef Zayed was found on Friday in the garden of the Palestinian Authority’s mission in Sofia, the Sofia Globe reported.

The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine published a statement accusing Israel’s Mossad foreign intelligence and special operations organization of killing Zayed, the news site nrg.co.il reported.

Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas also said Zayed was assassinated and that his death will be the subject of an investigation, though he did not name Israel as responsible.

According to the Bulgarian National Television, Zayed, 52, had fallen from one of the floors of the embassy building.

Zayed, who was born in Jenin, was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1986 for the murder of a Jewish yeshiva student in the Old City of Jerusalem. But he escaped while in the hospital in 1990 and settled in Bulgaria, where he was later granted permanent residence. His spouse and children, all three of whom were born in Bulgaria, have Bulgarian citizenship, The Globe reported.

Israel requested his extradition from Bulgaria in December, nrg reported. He moved into the Palestinian mission’s  compound while his lawyers were fighting the extradition request.

The news of Zayed’s death came during the visit to Israel of Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borissov, Deputy Prime Minister Tomislav Donchev and Foreign Minister Daniel Mitov. Borissov met with Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, Thursday.

Palestinian wanted by Israel found dead in Bulgaria Read More »

In rare rebuke, Netanyahu schools Cameron on eastern Jerusalem

In an unusual rebuke, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his British counterpart forgot basic facts when he criticized Israel’s construction in eastern Jerusalem.

“My friend David Cameron, who is without a doubt a friend of Israel, apparently forgot a few basic facts about Jerusalem,” Netanyahu said in a speech in Ofakim on Thursday, following statements by Cameron the previous day, in which he condemned Israeli construction in the eastern part of Israel’s capital city.

“Only Israeli sovereignty,” Netanyahu said, prevents the Islamic State terrorist group and Hamas “from burning the holy sites.”

Netanyahu’s didactic approach, which is a departure from the measured tone he usually uses when speaking about relations with an important E.U. ally of Israel, followed Cameron’s own unusual statement on Wednesday in the House of Commons.

“I am well known for being a strong friend of Israel, but I have to say the first time I visited Jerusalem and had a proper tour around that wonderful city and saw what had happened with the effective encirclement of east Jerusalem, occupied east Jerusalem, it is genuinely shocking,” Cameron said during a weekly question-and-answer session.

Israel annexed east Jerusalem, which it took over from Jordan in 1967, and considers its territory part of Israel proper, though this position is not internationally accepted.

The Palestinian Authority under Mahmoud Abbas aims to establish the capital of a future Palestinian state in east Jerusalem. The issue remains one of the main obstacles to reaching a peace settlement between Israel and the Palestinians.

In rare rebuke, Netanyahu schools Cameron on eastern Jerusalem Read More »

Sanders opens up on Jewish pride, Trump hit on Israel ‘neutrality,’

In a stinging debate exchange, Donald Trump’s professions of neutrality in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict became a front-and-center campaign issue.

All four of the real estate magnate’s rivals for the Republican presidential nod took him to task Thursday night on the debate stage in Houston for his position on Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking, which he says requires being an honest broker.

Separately, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., vying with Hillary Clinton for the Democratic presidential nod, in a Chicago town hall gave one of his most expansive answers so far during the presidential campaign on his Jewish identity.

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., introduced the topic of Trump’s neutrality early in the debate, in arguing that Trump, who has won three of the four early nominating contests, was closer to Democrats than Republicans. “He says he’s not going to take sides in the Palestinians versus Israel,” Rubio said.

Trump at an MSNBC town hall last week said, pressed on his positions on the conflict, “Let me sort of be a neutral guy, I don’t want to say whose fault is it, I don’t think it helps.”

The CNN moderators asked Trump about Israel, and he listed what he said were pro-Israel credentials, including once acting as grand marshal of the Salute to Israel parade in New York, giving to unspecified Israeli causes, and being awarded the Jewish National Fund “Tree of Life” award.

Trump also continued to insist that it would be unwise to reveal his hand before attempting to broker Israeli-Palestinian peace. “It doesn’t do any good to start demeaning the neighbors,” he said. “With that being said, I am totally pro-Israel.”

The other candidates pounced. Palestinian terrorists “are not equivalent to the IDF officers protecting Israel,” said Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas.

“The position you’ve taken is an anti-Israel position,” Rubio said, claiming that while Israel has sacrificed for peace, “the Palestinian Authority has walked away from multiple generous offers.”

Ohio Gov. John Kasich noted his pro-Israel record dating back to the 1980s and 1990s, when he was a congressman. “I’ve been a strong supporter of Israel longer than anyone on this stage,” he said.

Ben Carson, a retired neurosurgeon, recalled his own visit to Israel last year, and said while it “doesn’t mean we can’t be fair to other people,” the United States should treat Israel like its favored child.

Trump countered by claiming stronger negotiating deals as a longtime businessman, and Rubio interjected: “The Palestinians are not a real estate deal … a deal is not a deal when you’re dealing with terrorists, have you negotiated with terrorists?”

Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Democratic frontrunner, has also taken aim at Trump for his professions of neutrality. Speaking on CNN on Sunday, she said U.S. policy should take into account both the close U.S.-Israel relationship and the need for a two-state solution. Trump had “missed the mark” by claiming neutrality, she said.

“First of all, Israel is our partner, our ally,” Clinton said. “We have longstanding and important ties with Israelis going back to the formation of the state of Israel.

“I will defend and do everything I can to support Israel, particularly as the neighborhood around it seems to become more dangerous and difficult,” Clinton said.

That position and shepherding the sides toward peace “are not mutually exclusive,” she said. “I happen to think that moving toward a two-state solution, trying to provide more support for the aspirations of the Palestinian people is in the long-term best interest of Israel as well as the region and the people themselves,” she said.

Trump several times in recent days has said that he would be a “great friend” of Israel and has slammed the Obama administration for last year’s Iran nuclear deal, which Israel opposed.

In an interview this week with Israel Hayom, a mass circulation Israeli daily owned by Sheldon Adelson, a major Republican giver, Trump said he was Israel’s “best friend.”

Sanders, at a University of Chicago town hall on Thursday broadcast by MSNBC, was asked by a Jewish student to speak about his faith. The student noted that Sanders had been reticent about discussing his Judaism.

“Obviously, being Jewish is very, very important to me,” Sanders said. “I am very proud of my heritage. And what comes to my mind so strongly as a kid growing up in Brooklyn and seeing people with numbers on their wrists — you probably have not seen that — but those were the people who came out of the concentration camps. And knowing that, my — a good part of my father’s family was killed by the Nazis. And that lesson that I learned as a very young person is politics is a serious business. And when you have a lunatic like Hitler gaining power — 50 million people died in World War 2. So I am very, very proud to be Jewish and I’m proud of my heritage.”

Separately, the Anti-Defamation League called on Trump to distance himself from white supremacists who have intensified their call for his election in recent weeks.

“Mr. Trump may have distanced himself from white supremacists, but he must do so unequivocally,” said a statement issued Thursday in the name of Marvin Nathan, ADL National Chair, and Jonathan Greenblatt, ADL CEO. “It is time for him to come out firmly against these bigoted views and the people that espouse them.”

David Duke, a white supremacist, said this week that voting against Trump was tantamount to treason. Additionally, a supremacist political action committee has been making recorded calls urging people to vote for Trump.

 

Sanders opens up on Jewish pride, Trump hit on Israel ‘neutrality,’ Read More »

Watch: Kosha Dillz with Emcee Murs

Being different is nothing new to Kosha Dillz, who connects with LA Living Legend Emcee Murs to collaborate on what unifies them together the most–being different. The track, produced by Jesse Shatkin, (Sia, Santigold) gets the video treatment from Sephardic Music Festival curator Diwon, and has become one of Kosha's biggest live anthems to date. If you want to see more of Kosha, catch him alongside Matisyahu on March 2nd at the Wiltern.  If you want to see more of Murs. Check him out March 16th at El Rey theatre.

Watch: Kosha Dillz with Emcee Murs Read More »

Argentine prosecutor: AMIA special prosecutor Alberto Nisman was murdered

Alberto Nisman was murdered, the attorney general for Argentina’s Criminal Appeals Court said — the first suggestion by the country’s judicial branch that the AMIA special prosecutor’s mysterious death may have been an assassination.

Ricardo Saenz in a letter to the judges on Thursday called for a federal investigation of the case involving Nisman, who was found shot dead in his Buenos Aires apartment on Jan. 18, 2015. There has been no official cause of death.

A federal magistrate “has the broadest jurisdiction to clarify which of all the assumptions” involving Nisman’s death is accurate, Saenz wrote.

The Criminal Appeals Court will hold a hearing on March 18 to decide what court should be given jurisdiction over the case. Murder cases are handled by the federal courts.

Nisman’s family has claimed he was murdered. His former wife, Sandra Arroyo Salgado, has called for a federal investigation,

Saenz again put the spotlight on Diego Lagomarsino, the IT engineer who worked with Nisman at the AMIA special unit and admitted to lending Nisman the gun that ended his life. The versions about the presence of the gun at Nisman’s apartment are “contradictory,” Saenz wrote.

In his opinion, Saenz also referred to the results of tests on the gun said to have killed Nisman as elements that negate the possibility that the special prosecutor committed suicide.

Nisman, who was Jewish, was found hours before he was to present evidence to Argentine lawmakers that President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner covered up Iran’s role in the 1994 attack on the AMIA Jewish center in Buenos Aires that left 85 dead and hundreds wounded.

Argentine prosecutor: AMIA special prosecutor Alberto Nisman was murdered Read More »

5 Questions CNN needs to ask Donald Trump

In my column this week I outed Donald Trump for inspiring and energizing the white supremacist movement.  Perhaps he didn't do so intentionally, but as I wrote, “When you say nasty, divisive things, you empower nasty, divisive people.”

A day after my column appeared, former KKK Eunuch-In-Chief David Duke endorsed Trump, and shortly after the Anti-Defamation League called on Trump to denounce Duke and confront the hate groups he has so inspired.  It’s frustrating that at press conferences and debates,  reporters and anchors don’t press Trump on this issue. 

Here are five questions CNN needs to ask Donald Trump:

1. You have said that when you retweeted the tweets of avowed white supremacists, you did so inadvertently.  What steps have you taken to make sure this doesn’t happen again?

2. Why do you think your campaign is so popular among groups and web sites that espouse racist anti-Mexican, anti-black and anti-Semitic ideas?

3. The head of the ADL has said your campaign has energized white supremacist groups.  Does that concern you?   What will you do about it?

4. FBI statistics show that white supremacist and militia groups have killed more Americans on American soil over the past decade than have Islamic-inspired attacks.   What will you do in a Trump presidency to combat these groups?

5. You have two Jewish grandchildren.  Your campaign was just endorsed by David Duke, who has espoused vicious anti-Semitism for years. Why do you think he’s drawn to your candidacy?  What is your message to David Duke? 

Anderson?  Wolf?  Get on it.

Rob Eshman is Editor-in-Chief and Publisher of TRIBE Media, which produces Jewish Journal, jewishjournal.com and Jewish Insider.  This is his blog for news and opinion.  For Rob’s award-winning food blog, go to foodaism.com. Want to email Rob, click here.  Follow him on Twitter @robeshman and @foodaism.

5 Questions CNN needs to ask Donald Trump Read More »