fbpx

February 19, 2016

Sartorial Salvation – Thoughts on Torah Portion Tetsaveh

Sartorial Salvation


Thought on Torah Portion Tetsaveh 2016


Last Shabbat, I taught about the Tallit, the four cornered prayer shawl with the fringes attached to the corners. Many people don’t wear one at synagogue. They say they not “bar/t mitzvahed” – please remember, you are automatically a bar/t mitzvah when you turn 13. Some say they are not Jewish (yet, in some cases). I say we are very liberal at our synagogue about non-Jewish seekers trying on Jewish practices, in this case, literally.

But some say that they don’t like engaging in externalities. Spirituality is an inner experience, not something that you wear. I appeal to any memory that you might have of wearing a uniform. I have my memories of wearing a U.S. military uniform for three years, and lately of my putting on my Jiu Jitsu gear. People have special clothes for the beach, for yoga, for gardening, for running, dancing or biking. Something happens when you suit up.

This week’s Torah portion, Tetsaveh, is partly concerned with the vestments of the ancient Israelite priesthood. Those of priestly descent (people named Cohen and the like), however, have no special vestments today. Whatever a Jew chooses to wear depending on their religious orientation, at services or not, anyone can wear it, all other things being equal (e.g. male/female, obviously, in the Orthodox world).

I love wearing my tallis/tallit (both pronunciations are acceptable), I love teaching about it, I love it when someone starts wearing one on Shabbat, and especially when they go out and acquire their own. You can feel wrapped in the Divine light.

Oftentimes I get The Question. Someone mentions the unscrupulous behavior of some Orthodox Jew.  I remember asking the same question myself, of my local Chabad rabbi when I was teenager. It is tragic. Some people, no matter how much they suit up, nothing sinks in. Other folks carry themselves with sterling virtue, not only with no special vestments, but no religion to speak of. Often this leads to a very painful conversation. The truth is that spirituality (here meaning the inner life experience of the transcendent), morality and religion have almost no predictable relationship with each other.

All three require a separate act of will. You can be a ritually observant Jew, or not ritually observant, and be equally moral or immoral, spiritual or not spiritual. It is obvious that you need an act of will to act more religiously observant. You also need an equally firm act of will to be moral and a further act of will to be spiritual. Those who teach that being ritually observant makes you more moral and spiritual are wrong. Nothing can make you so except your own will to do so and further will to acquire the skills.

Here is what all three, ritual observance, moral virtue and spirituality, have in common: each entails a loss of freedom. If you keep kosher and/or keep Shabbat, for example, even minimally, you are not completely free in how you eat or spend your weekends.

Being truly moral always involves a conscious intention and choice to do the right thing, and often involves restraint and maybe even a cost, sometimes loss of money, sometimes loss of ego. You just can’t benefit yourself and you can’t just do what you feel like doing.

Being truly spiritual means you can’t conduct your inner life any old way you want to. You have inner standards that you have to live up to.

No sartorial salvation, we like to say. No way of dressing, no get-up or uniform will imbue us with inner qualities. I am one of those who believes, as it says in the Talmud, “rachmana liba ba’ei” – “God wants the heart.” Any external commandments are there solely to help us cultivate our spiritual and moral qualities.

So why wear a tallit, for example? Once you have made the decision to cultivate your moral and spiritual qualities, and all the realms that are connected with that, you will need all the help you can get to help you live by that decision. You will have to re-decide and recommit every day.

You might have to write it on your hand so you can look at it morning and night, maybe even write it on your forehead, and have other people read it back to you. As usual in life, other people can often see things that we cannot see.

Clothes definitely don’t make the person, but once you decide who you want to become, external symbols of inner realities can remind us who we are and what we aspire to be.

Sartorial Salvation – Thoughts on Torah Portion Tetsaveh Read More »

Institutional Traditions Changing

This past week with the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and the continuing coverage of the two presidential nomination races, a reality of our times that has gone little commented on was brought into sharp focus—–the diversity of the candidates for president and the unusual makeup of the United States Supreme Court.

As Justice Scalia’s replacement is discussed, it is hard not to notice that an institution that was once the domain of white Anglo Saxon Protestant males now has not one W.A.S.P. on the nine member court. Instead, a court that for decades had seven Anglo justices, one (occasionally two) Roman Catholics and one (and once two) Jewish justices and no females now has NO Protestant justices, three Jews, three females, and until Justice Scalia’s death, six Catholic justices.

Other than perhaps the remnant of the Ku Klux Klan and other far out haters, that transformation has been barely remarked on. No one now seems to be clamoring for a Protestant to reclaim a seat on the Court—party affiliation and ideology seem far more important than a justice’s place of worship.

That was not historically the case—-when Louis J. Brandeis (the first Jewish justice) was appointed to the Court in 1916 by Woodrow Wilson, one critic “>Larry David’s impression on Saturday Night Live) yet, he attracts young people by the thousands and his religion seems irrelevant to their assessment of his qualifications.

When Sen. Joe Lieberman ran for vice president in 2000 I Institutional Traditions Changing Read More »

World Jewish Congress to honor Paraguay’s president with peace prize

President Horacio Cartes of Paraguay will be recognized by the World Jewish Congress for what the group said was his “contributions to building coexistence.”

Cartes will receive the Shalom Prize, the WJC’s Latin American branch and Cartes’ office both announced Tuesday. The prize, which was established to recognize individuals or organizations who seek peace, will be awarded at a March ceremony in Buenos Aires, the Argentine capital and headquarters of the Latin American Jewish Congress.

Jack Terpins, president of the Latin American Jewish Congress, said Cartes was selected for his “constant support of dialogue and negotiation, from a neutral place, about the situation in the Middle East. ”

Leaders of the Latin American Jewish Congress informed Cartes of the honor at a meeting Tuesday.

“The Jewish people have a lot of history, is very rich in tradition and memory, so this award is an honor for me,” Cartes said at the meeting.

Cartes has confirmed he will be present in Buenos Aires to receive the award, according to the president’s website.

Other Latin American presidents who have received the award include Michelle Bachelet of Chile in 2008 and Juan Manuel Santos of Colombia in 2012.

In July 2014, World Jewish Congress President Ronald Lauder thanked the government of Paraguay for refusing to sign what he called a “harmful and unbalanced resolution” on the Israel-Hamas conflict offered by the Mercosur, a trade group of five South American nations. He said Cartes “took a brave stand” by refusing to sign.

“We thank him for insisting on fairness, which this declaration lacked,” Lauder said.

Also attending Tuesday’s meeting with Cartes were Saul Gilvich of Uruguay, the secretary general of the Latin Jewish Congress; Jack Fleishman, president of the Jewish community of Paraguay, and other Jewish leaders and Paraguayan officials.

World Jewish Congress to honor Paraguay’s president with peace prize Read More »

Holland to ban export of kosher and halal meat

The Dutch government said it plans to limit ritual slaughter through new measures, including a ban on the export of kosher and halal meat.

On Wednesday, Agriculture Minister Martijn van Dam announced the plan in a letter to the Tweede Kamer, the lower house of the Dutch parliament.

In addition to the ban on exporting kosher and halal meat, the new measures will make the production of such meat subject to the discretion of officials from the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. Last year, the authority urged the government to ban ritual slaughter outright, claiming it was inhumane.

The authority “will oversee compliance with legal requirements connected to animal welfare,” the letter read. In slaughter without prior stunning – a requirement in both kosher and halal slaughter – the authority “will permanently oversee the actual practice of the slaughter.” Slaughterhouses will bear the costs of any activity connected to the authority, the letter read.

The Netherlands does not export significant amounts of kosher meat.

Nearly four years ago, the Dutch government reached an agreement with Jewish and Muslim leaders setting certain standards for ritual slaughter, including a 40-second limit on the time between stunning of the animals before their necks are cut. The agreement, known locally as the covenant on slaughter, also said officials will carry out research-based consultations with faith community leaders on how to balance animal welfare with religious freedoms.

The covenant was signed following the Dutch senate’s scrapping in 2012 of a law passed by parliament the previous year banning all slaughter without stunning.

Religious laws in Islam and Judaism require animals be conscious when their necks are cut.

While the covenant addressed some details, since its signing “the setting of general regulations has not taken place,” van Dam wrote, because of lacking documentation – which has since been performed, including by the food authority.

Holland to ban export of kosher and halal meat Read More »

BDS activist to represent Holocaust survivors at Austrian state event

Austria invited Hedy Epstein, a Jewish pro-Palestinian activist whom the Anti-Defamation League criticized for demonizing Israel, to represent Holocaust survivors at a panel discussion about women during World War II.

In invitations sent out Friday by the office of the president of the Austrian parliament, Epstein, who has likened Israel to Nazi Germany, was described as a peace and human rights activist. She is the only Jewish guest slated to speak at the event, scheduled to take place March 8.

The ADL in 2005 listed statements made by Epstein, who was born in Germany and spent most of World War II in Britain, first among examples of anti-Israel campus activism that “would meet both the United States government’s and [Natan] Sharansky’s definitions of anti-Semitism.” The ADL statement was in response to a lecture given by Epstein in 2004 at Stanford University, in which she compared the Nazi treatment of Jews to Israeli treatment of Palestinians.

Epstein has participated in several actions to break Israel’s blockade of the Hamas-run Gaza Strip and has signed numerous petitions by the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel.

Born in Germany in 1924, she left the country in 1939 on a Kindertransport — the name for efforts to rescue European children of the era to the relative safety of Britain — where she spent the war years.

BDS activist to represent Holocaust survivors at Austrian state event Read More »

Anti-Israel campus activists shifting strategies, facing internal divisions

Anti-Israel campus groups in the United States are shifting their tactics, replacing BDS resolutions with “theatrics and disruptive tactics,” according to a report by a Jewish watchdog group.

In its “Fall 2015 Campus Trends” report, released Friday, the Israel on Campus Coalition also reports that anti-Israel groups have invested “significant efforts” in strengthening ties with other activist causes on campus, yet the movement overall has faced “considerable divisions.”

While the number of anti-Israel events has dropped since the previous fall, when Israel’s war in the Gaza Strip “triggered an unusually high number,” more such events are enjoying co-sponsorship from “groups unrelating to Israel, reflecting the impact of coalition-building” among anti-Israel activists, according the report.

Meanwhile, the report found an increase in pro-Israel activities on campus.

“Disruptive tactics” observed in the report include “staging dramatic protests” at pro-Israel events and at campus lectures by Israeli speakers. In some of these incidents, the national Students for Justice in Palestine group filmed protests and then published “altered videos that generated vicious attacks against campus supporters of Israel,” the report said.

According to the report, anti-Israel student activists are divided over the efficacy of the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel, the Syrian civil war and “other geopolitical issues.”

In a news release, ICC Executive Director Jacob Baime said pro-Israel campus activists are “focusing on positive and proactive ways to express support for Israel on campuses across the country.”

The organization issued a similar report in August documenting activities and trends from the 2014-15 academic year.

Anti-Israel campus activists shifting strategies, facing internal divisions Read More »

Jewish groups join call for swift Senate consideration of Obama Supremes nominee

An array of Jewish groups joined a call on Senate leaders to consider whomever President Barack Obama nominates to replace Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

Thirteen of the 31 groups signing the letter sent Friday to Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee were Jewish, among them groups representing the Reform movement and the Reconstructionist movement as well as the Anti-Defamation League, the Habonim Dror youth movement, the National Council of Jewish Women, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs and Jewish Women International.

“A seat intentionally left vacant for an extended period of time – either through a delayed nomination or delayed consideration – threatens the ability of the government to operate at full capacity, as well as the ability for justice to be served in a timely fashion,” said the letter, organized by the Reform movement’s Religious Action Center. “Justice delayed is anathema to us as Americans and as people of faith seeking to create a more just nation and world.”

McConnell has urged Obama to leave any nomination to the next president and has suggested that the Republican-led Senate simply would not consider a nomination. Grassley, whose committee would first consider any nomination, has been more equivocal, saying that he would not out of hand refuse to consider an Obama nominee, but also doubting that one would clear the Senate before Obama leaves office next January.

Scalia, one of the court’s most conservative justices, died suddenly last weekend. Obama has said he would soon nominate a replacement.

In addition to signing onto this letter, eight leaders of the Reform movement sent a similar letter to McConnell and Grassley citing Jewish teachings.

“Many of the Torah’s commandments and rabbis’ teachings specifically deal with the importance of a fair judicial system,” said the letter sent Friday.

“The delay of justice is said to be a cause of violence, as we are taught, ‘The sword came into the world because of justice delayed and justice denied’ (Pirke Avot 5:8),” said the letter, signed by Rabbi Rick Jacobs, the president of the Union for Reform Judaism, as well as lay and professional leaders of four other branches of the movement. “These lessons in the importance of a fully functioning judicial body inspire our belief that a delay in filling the open Supreme Court seat would inhibit the delivery of justice and undermine our nation’s judicial system overall.”

Jewish groups join call for swift Senate consideration of Obama Supremes nominee Read More »

Trump calls for boycott until Apple unlocks shooter’s phone

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump called on Friday for a boycott of Apple Inc products until the tech company agrees to help the U.S. government unlock the cellphone of one of the killers in the San Bernardino, Calif., attack.

“Boycott Apple until such time as they give that information,” Trump said at a campaign event in Pawleys Island, South Carolina. “It just occurred to me.” 

Trump made the off-the-cuff comment at a town hall-style event at a country club in Pawleys Island, a day before that state's Republican presidential nominating contest. 

The Republican front-runner in the 2016 White House race has been a frequent critic of Apple and called on the company to make more products in the United States.

Trump's spokeswoman, Hope Hicks, said the real estate mogul does not use an iPhone.

His latest comments came as the U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion seeking to forceApple to comply with a judge's order for the company to unlock the iPhone belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters, portraying the tech company's refusal as a “marketing strategy.”

The filing escalated a showdown between the Obama administration and Silicon Valley over security and privacy that ignited earlier this week.

Trump calls for boycott until Apple unlocks shooter’s phone Read More »

Yeshiva University sheds half of $1B endowment along with medical school

Yeshiva University’s $1 billion endowment will be cut nearly in half as part of its split with the Albert Einstein School of Medicine, which is to become a separate entity, the Forward reported.

The university’s transfer of funds to the new venture — a total of $465 million — is disclosed in financial documents the school released last month and revealed in the Forward report Friday.

“These assets will no longer be Y.U.’s,” said one faculty member, who spoke to the Forward on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation. “They will be transferred to Einstein — and that’s a big chunk.”

A spokesman for the university confirmed the figure but emphasized that the money in question had originally been designated for the medical school and was not taken from funds meant for the university’s other schools or departments.

Einstein, a celebrated school in the larger Y.U. system, has been losing tens of millions of dollars annually. And Y.U., which is facing its worst financial crisis in recent memory, determined that the Bronx medical school was largely responsible for the university’s financial woes, including large budget deficits and degraded credit status by bond rating agencies, according to the Forward report.

Einstein accounted for about two-thirds of the university’s annual operating deficits when Y.U. reached an agreement with Montefiore Health System – a chain of six hospitals and an extended-care facility — to make the medical school part of Montefiore, which is to assume financial and operational responsibility for it.

Y.U.’s president, Richard Joel hailed the agreement with Montefiore as “historic” when it was reached in 2014. The university, he said, was “taking a powerful and important step towards building a financially sustainable Yeshiva University.”

In September, Y.U. officially relinquished financial and operational responsibility of Einstein to Montefiore, though it retained its role as the degree-granting institution for the medical school’s graduates. Einstein’s accreditation is expected to be approved in 2018, a statement from the medical school’s dean read.

Yeshiva University sheds half of $1B endowment along with medical school Read More »

Canadian parliament to pass motion rejecting BDS

Canada’s parliament stands poised to reject the BDS campaign against Israel.

The Liberals, who comprise the majority of seats in the House of Commons, said the party will support an opposition motion introduced Thursday calling on the House to formally reject the goals of the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement.

The motion was introduced by two Conservative lawmakers in parliament. Both the New Democratic Party and Green Party have indicated that they will oppose the motion.

“This is not a partisan issue,” said Tony Clement, the Conservative foreign affairs critic, in leading off the debate. He called BDS a form of discrimination, “just like boycotts that have targeted Jews throughout history.”

Rejecting the BDS movement specifically, Foreign Affairs Minister Stéphane Dion said “the world will win nothing for boycotting Israel but depriving itself of the talents of its inventiveness,” adding, “We must fight anti-Semitism in all its forms.”

The motion states that “given Canada and Israel share a long history of friendship as well as economic and diplomatic relations, the House reject the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which promotes the demonization and delegitimization of the State of Israel, and call upon the government to condemn any and all attempts by Canadian organizations, groups or individuals to promote the BDS movement, both here at home and abroad.”

The Canadian bill comes amid numerous initiatives condemning and banning attempts to boycott Israel in the United States — where state legislatures in New York, Pennsylvania, Florida, Alabama, Tennessee and Indiana passed anti-BDS resolutions – and in Europe.

Earlier this week, Britain’s government announced its plan to outlaw BDS. If passed, the measures will make Britain the second major European country with laws against boycotting Israel.

France passed such laws in 2003, and they have served as the basis for multiple convictions of BDS activists who were sentenced for incitement to discrimination or hate due to their actions on Israel.

On Tuesday, the City Council of Paris passed two declarative motions expressing the city’s rejection of attempts to boycott Israel.

Canadian parliament to pass motion rejecting BDS Read More »