fbpx

November 23, 2015

#myLAcommute I really enjoy making patients comfortable

MAYA H.

My commute is long, but I don’t complain about it. And I don’t fight it. It’s better to have a positive attitude. I’m a dental assistant. The other day, I had a patient who was crying, freaking out, and saying she was going to pass out. People are really vulnerable at the dentist. I know everyone hates going to the dentist, but I really enjoy making patients comfortable. I had braces growing up, so I have empathy.

Laurel Canyon Blvd. to Western Ave.

#myLAcommute is a project of Zócalo Public Square.

#myLAcommute I really enjoy making patients comfortable Read More »

Drake is not dead: Don’t believe everything you read on the internet

There are a couple things you can count on occurring at least once every couple weeks on social media. One, some kind of hoax will go viral on Facebook whether it’s a scam for free airline tickets or Bill Gates passing out money if you “share this post.” The other is news of a celebrity’s passing, when he or she is actually very much alive. When you combine hoaxes and Facebook, the false news spreads quickly, leaving millions of people either perplexed or mourning their idol. The most recent victim of the Internet prank is Drake, Canadian singer, rapper, producer, and star of your favorite Hotline Bling meme.

Read more at Digital Trends.

Drake is not dead: Don’t believe everything you read on the internet Read More »

The prayers of the refugees should be our prayers

As we read in last Shabbat's Torah portion, Jacob left Canaan for Paddan-Aram, not knowing whether he would return, asking for divine help. He negotiated with God — if you protect me and return me safely, only then will you be my God, only then will I worship you. (Gen. 28:20-21)

When Jacob left for Paddan-Aram, he left as a refugee, fleeing his brother Esau, and when he returned to Canaan with his wives and family, he was fleeing from his father-in-law Laban. Even while Jacob was in Paddan-Aram, Jacob says, he lived like a refugee, unprotected, robbed of sleep, suffering heat by day, cold by night. (Gen. 31:10) In between, he passed through what is now Syria, and the region where Jacob spent twenty years serving for his wives and flocks is now part of the territory controlled by ISIL.

My great-grandfather Benyamin left Ottoman Jerusalem for the United States in 1910, when the empire started drafting Jews into its army. And my great-grandmother Farida came from Aleppo Syria in 1913, for the same reason, because she was chosen by her family to shepherd her younger brother and a male cousin to the United States when they were approaching draft age.

Of course there was no modern Syria then, and the whole area, from Syria to Jerusalem, was a province of the Ottoman Empire. Benyamin, like Farida, was a Syrian Jew who followed Syrian nusach and customs.

Farida knew when she left that she would never return to Aleppo. But for the rest of his life, Benyamin hoped he would some day return to Nachlaot, near the market in west Jerusalem, to see his family.

If Benyamin, my Gidau (“grandpa” in Arabic), prayed like Jacob, then most of his prayers were answered — he found work in Manhattan's garment district, raised a family, led prayers in his Syrian shtibl on Rivington Street (to use the Ashkenazi word for an intimate neighborhood synagogue), got to play rhythms on his Syrian doumbek for his great-grandson. But he never did get to return to Jerusalem.

Benyamin and Farida were both immigrants, not refugees. I never met any of my other great-grandparents, and I only know a little about their circumstances. One came from Warszawa (Warsaw), the rest from other places in Europe, and all arrived in the U.S. well before the second World War. I don't think any of them ever expected to return to their birthplaces in Europe. I don't know about the names or the fates of the people they left behind. But if they tried to get into the U.S. just a few decades later, when they would have been desperate refugees, they would have been out of luck.

Make no mistake, hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees were kept out of this country because politicians drummed up fears and put up walls, saying that a wave of Jewish refugees might conceal Nazi infiltrators, that we had to “take care of our own” first, and such — almost ” rel=”noreferrer” target=”_blank”>neohasid.org and the author of The prayers of the refugees should be our prayers Read More »

I’ll have what she’s having

This article originally appeared on Zócalo Public Square.

My maternal grandparents, Jean and Lou Kaplan, did not keep kosher. That was their ancestors’ way, the path of slavish adherence to the stringencies of Jewish law. But old habits die hard, and they never ate the foods they had not consumed as children. They would sooner have taken off all their clothes and danced naked in front of their neighbors in Flushing, Queens, than down ham, clams, or even a cheeseburger.

So when we went out to eat with my grandparents, we invariably gravitated to a Jewish deli. It was the deli, of all places, where they seemed most at home, where my grandmother could wrap her mouth around a tongue sandwich, and my grandfather slurp up his mushroom barley soup, before proceeding, with renewed gusto, to sweet-and-sour stuffed cabbage. My younger sister and I, far more Americanized, preferred open-faced roast beef sandwiches, blanketed with bland brown gravy.

In interwar New York delis, comedian Harpo Marx exulted, he found “my people, speaking my language, with my accent.” The deli was a place for New York Jews to articulate a newfound but potent sense of secular, rather than religious, Jewish identity. What their immigrant parents had experienced in the musty precincts of the synagogue they found by fressing salty, spicy, smoky flesh on crusty rye bread. 

No matter that their half-starved, persecuted ancestors had almost never eaten pastrami and corned beef—these lower-middle-class children of immigrants “learned to think of them as traditional,” as historian Hasia Diner puts it, retroactively endowing the deli sandwich with a Jewish pedigree. 

In her seminal study, The Invention of the Restaurant, historian Rebecca Spang finds that restaurants were founded in pre-Revolutionary Paris for the aristocracy to repair their delicate constitutions by sipping bouillon; the broth itself was known as a restaurant (restorative). Elaborate eateries were places of respite; in the words of Dr. Louis Véron, a patent medicine entrepreneur and opera manager quoted by Spang, they promised “silence and solitude in the middle of a crowd.”

In inaugurating the deli, New York Jews created a noisy, crude establishment that turned this original notion of a restaurant on its head. While it had roots in the take-out gourmet shops of Paris, Rome, and Frankfurt, the deli mutated in New York into a venue for eating out, and a remarkably laid-back one at that. The deli was a place where Jews could disregard the perceptions of the majority society and let it all hang out, like the sausages dangling enticingly in the plate glass window. 

They could dress down, joke, and talk loud (including with patrons at neighboring tables) and eat with their hands, in a casual and convivial atmosphere with no candles and tablecloths. They were no longer, for the most part, speaking Yiddish, but much of their boisterous style of behavior was carried over from Eastern European Jewish culture, characterized by flights of impassioned, free-wheeling argument and debate.

Indeed, if, for the German-Jewish sociologist Norbert Elias, becoming “civilized” in Western society meant learning to repress one’s bodily functions, then the deli was a place to flout the standards of polite behavior in a safe space that was largely, if not exclusively, populated by other Jews. Other ethnic groups had their own particular, similarly indispensable gathering places: Irish pubs, Italian social clubs, and black barbershops (or beauty parlors). 

But the Jewish deli was different in two senses: It was oriented around bodily pleasure, and it was dedicated to an extravagant form of visual display. (Little wonder that the most notorious deli scene in pop culture, from Rob Reiner’s 1989 rom com, When Harry Met Sally, involves a histrionic exhibition of a normally very private moment of pleasure.) Particularly in the glitzy, glamorous kosher-style delis in and around Times Square, Jews—mostly male—showed off to each other how much meat they could commandeer and eat.

Served in an entertaining fashion by sneering, wise-cracking waiters (“Is anything OK?” they demanded, sarcastically), who were frequently failed performers on the vaudeville, Yiddish, or Broadway stage, the overstuffed sandwich—one of the first types of fast food in the metropolis—was elevated into a towering, skyscraper sign of affluence, a multi-layered symbol of the American Dream. 

Before long, however, deli meats were demonized for having too much fat, cholesterol, and sodium to fit into the diet of upwardly mobile Jews. As they spread to the suburbs after World War II—and sought to join the country clubs that went with them—Jews reshaped their bodies according to prevailing notions of fitness and beauty, and revamped their diets to embrace more “exotic” fare like Chinese food. The deli inevitably lost its purchase on American Jewish identity. 

Yet the gestalt of the deli lives on in myriad ways in our culture, from the Borscht Belt, schticky humor of Billy Crystal and Mel Brooks (“Got pastrami?” Brooks quips as his tagline on Sirius XM radio) to Subway’s brash “Big Hot” pastrami sandwiches. Political pundit Bill Maher tweeted that the recent Democratic debate between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders was “gonna be like an elderly Jewish couple arguing in the deli.” 

Furthermore, while greatly diminished in number, Jewish delis are not yet extinct, nor have they evolved. Walk into Brent’s in L.A.’s Northridge neighborhood, Manny’s on Chicago’s Jefferson Street, or Katz’s on New York’s Houston Street and you’re transported back into an era when the deli still functioned as a stark counterpoint to the rest of society, a place where courteousness and gentility were ejected in favor of relaxation and ribald humor.

The irony is that few of the patrons eating in these delis are Jewish; they are Asian-American, Latino, African-American, you name it. So, rather than Jews paying tribute to a tradition that they have long ago transcended, non-Jews are—as, ironically, Jews did with Chinese food—adopting aspects of a once-vibrant ethnic heritage and incorporating it into their own unfolding experience of urban life. 

Indeed, a potato knish by any other pronunciation tastes as good, especially if you slather it, as my grandparents did, with thick and spicy mustard—a three-dimensional edible canvas ripe for painting and repainting however you like before stuffing it swiftly and unceremoniously down the hatch.

Ted Merwin teaches religion and Judaic studies at Dickinson College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania; he also writes about theater and dance for the New York Jewish Week. He is the author of Pastrami on Rye: An Overstuffed History of the Jewish Deli. This was written for What It Means to Be American, a partnership of the Smithsonian and Zócalo Public Square, and is part of Why We Feast, a project of Zócalo Public Square.

 

I’ll have what she’s having Read More »

France finds explosive belt, detects Paris suspect’s phone

A suspected explosive belt was found dumped near Paris on Monday and the mobile phone of a fugitive believed to have taken part in the attacks on Nov. 13 was detected in two locations in the city, a source close to the investigation said.

France and Belgium have launched a manhunt following the attacks that killed 130 people, with a focus on Brussels barkeeper Salah Abdeslam, 26, who returned to the city fromParis hours after the attacks and is still at large. 

Abdeslam's mobile phone was detected after the attacks in the 18th district in the north ofParis, near an abandoned car that he had rented, and then later in Chatillon in the south, the source said on Monday. 

Detectives were examining what appeared to be an explosive belt found in a litter bin in the town of Montrouge, south of the capital and not far from Chatillon.

The source said it was too soon to say whether the belt had been in contact with Abdeslam, whose elder brother blew himself during the gun and suicide bomb attacks.

One theory was that Abdeslam had intended to blow himself up in the 18th district but had abandoned the plan, although it was not clear why.

“Maybe he had a technical problem with his explosive belt,” a police source said.

Fearing an imminent threat of a Paris-style attack, Belgium extended a maximum security alert in Brussels for a week but said the metro system and schools could re-open on Wednesday.

“We are still confronted with the threat we were facing yesterday,” Prime Minister Charles Michel said. Potential targets remained shopping areas and public transport.

Belgium has been at the heart of investigations into the Paris attacks since French law enforcement bodies said two of the suicide bombers had lived there. Three people have been charged in Belgium with terrorist offences, including two who travelled back with Abdeslam from Brussels.

TERRORIST OFFENCES

As authorities tried to establish Abdeslam's movements and whereabouts, a source said he travelled through Italy in August with a companion, but his presence caused no alarm because he was not a wanted man at the time.

His companion was Ahmet Dahmani, a Belgian man of Moroccan origin who was arrested in Turkey last week on suspicion of involvement in the Paris attacks, the investigative source said.

In Belgium, prosecutors said they had charged a fourth person with terrorist offences linked to the Paris attacks.

They released all 15 others detained in police raids on Sunday. Two of five people detained on Monday were also released while the other three had their custody prolonged.

Soldiers patrolled the streets of Brussels, which has been in lockdown since Saturday.

The metro, museums, most cinemas and many shops were shut on Monday in the usually bustling EU capital where many staff have opted to work from home. There was also no school or university for almost 300,000 students.

On the Grand Place, a historic central square that usually draws crowds of tourists, an armoured military vehicle was parked under an illuminated Christmas tree.

NATO, which raised its alert level after the Paris attacks, said its headquarters in the city were open, but some staff had been asked to work from home. EU institutions were also open with soldiers patrolling outside.

Interior Minister Jan Jambon told RTL radio, however, that the capital was still operating. “Apart from the closed metro and schools, life goes on in Brussels,” he said.

City buses were running normally and many shops in the suburbs were open.

Workers were also setting up stalls for the city centre Christmas market, which is due to open on Friday, and organisers of the Davis Cup tennis final between Belgium and Britain in the city of Ghent, 55 km (35 miles) from the capital, said it would go ahead this weekend. 

AIRCRAFT CARRIER

French jets from the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier struck Islamic State targets in Iraq on Monday while Britain offered France the use of an air base in Cyprus to hit the militants behind the Paris attacks. 

French President Francois Hollande met British Prime Minister David Cameron in Paris as part of efforts to rally support for the fight against Islamic State, which claimed the Nov. 13 attacks. Hollande is also due to visit Washington and Moscow this week.

Cameron offered air-to-air refuelling services and said he was convinced Britain should carry out air strikes alongside France and would be recommending that Britain's parliament vote through such measures.

France has intensified its bombings in Syria since the attacks in Paris.

French jets taking off from the country's flagship in the eastern Mediterranean destroyed targets in Ramadi and Mosul in Iraq on Monday in support of Iraqi forces on the ground, the French armed forces said in a statement.

France finds explosive belt, detects Paris suspect’s phone Read More »

U2 sets December dates for Paris concerts postponed by attacks

Irish rock band U2 set early December dates for concerts in Paris on Monday, after cancelling two earlier performances following the attacks by Islamic State militants that took 130 lives.

U2 said they hoped to reflect the indomitable spirit of the city with their “iNNOCENCE + eXPERIENCE LIVE IN PARIS” special, which will be filmed live and broadcast by cable TV channel HBO.

The band was originally scheduled to perform in Paris on Nov. 14 and Nov. 15, immediately after the Nov. 13 attacks on bars, restaurants, a soccer stadium and the Bataclan concert hall. 

“So much that was taken from Paris on the tragic night of November 13th is irreplaceable. For one night, the killers took lives, took music, took peace of mind – but they couldn't steal the spirit of that city,” frontman Bono said in a statement.

“It's a spirit our band knows well and will try to serve when we return for the postponed shows on December 6th and 7th. We're going to put on our best for Paris,” he added.

The Dec. 7 concert will be filmed live at the Accorhotels Arena in Bercy and will air on HBO the same day.

U2 sets December dates for Paris concerts postponed by attacks Read More »

Seriously, advice from John Kerry? (or: The one thing on which Israelis and Palestinians agree)

More than 20 Israelis were killed in the last two months as a result of Palestinian attacks. More than 90 Palestinians were killed in the same period. What story do these numbers tell? What conclusions are the two peoples drawing from the story these numbers tell?

For Israelis, the number of Palestinians killed does not really matter: They worry about their own, and they know that while Israelis were innocent in their untimely sudden deaths, most Palestinians were not — they were attackers, stabbers, active participants in the wave of violence in which they found their own deaths.

For Palestinians, the numbers of Palestinians killed is proof that they, yet again, are the victims. They do not see many of the Israelis killed in the attacks as innocent — a settler, an Israeli Jew living or passing through the West Bank, is never innocent. They have a story line incompatible with the Israeli narrative — and incompatible with reality.

Case in point: Recently, a 16-year-old Palestinian was killed near the Hawara checkpoint in the West Bank. She was first run over by a car driven by a well-known former settler leader, and then shot to death. In Palestinian radio reports and in formal announcements by the Palestinian Authority (PA), the tragic death of this young teen was presented as an Israeli execution of a blameless victim. The incident was presented in a detailed fashion and declared by the PA as a “brutal war crime against humanity and childhood,” omitting just one tiny nugget of information: Ashraqat Taha Ahmad Qatanani, from Nablus, was killed as she allegedly was running toward a young Israeli woman with a knife in hand.

A knife is no joke, as another recent attack proved — this time an attack in which the Palestinian aggressor was quicker than his Israeli victims. He, the 34-year-old attacker, was a man with no previous known involvement with terrorism. She, the victim, was a 21-year-old woman just coming back from half a year of traveling in India. She is counted as one of the more than 20 Israelis killed. He is counted as one of the more than 90 Palestinians killed. They are both part of two contradicting narratives that currently show no signs of merging.

United States Secretary of State John Kerry was slated to arrive in Tel Aviv on Nov. 24 for visits to Israel and to the Palestinian Authority, in an attempt to stop the ongoing violence. After more than a year of absence — a year in which U.S.-Israeli tensions have reached a new height — his visit should be welcomed as a healthy sign of things coming back to normal, even if they are still tense.

Kerry has had his share of disappointment with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and he still seems to believe that an achievement was denied him by a belligerent Israeli position. One quality of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that never ceases to amaze me is its ability to delude leaders into believing that they are painfully close to sealing a final status agreement to end all hostility. Kerry, not the sharpest among these negotiators, will be joining that pathetic chorus of we-almost-made-it leaders — American and Israeli.

He was not even close, nor was former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert — another leader who recently gave Israelis the impression that the peace deal was within reach when he was in office. His Palestinian counterpart, Mahmoud Abbas, admitted that he rejected Olmert’s generous offer, and said that he had to do it because Olmert was not willing to leave the offer — a map of the territory Olmert was willing to hand to the PA — with him.

This was no coincidence. Olmert, as irresponsible as he might have been with the offer (this is surely the view of most Israelis today), was responsible enough to know that handing Abbas the map would have made the map a starting point for negotiation rather than an end result. He was also responsible enough to know that its rejection means more than a technical debate over the mechanism of peace-making. Abbas did not accept the offer because he cannot accept any offer that is acceptable to Israelis.

Kerry possibly understands some of this, and yet is still somewhat bitter at the fact that he was denied his peace-making glory. Now he comes to the region at the worst imaginable time. Violence is up, American prestige is down. Israelis and Palestinians are fighting with one another, but one thing they have in common is a very low regard for the Obama administration and its diplomatic prowess. Looking around at the result of seven years of Obama policies in the Middle East does not give Israelis or Palestinians much appetite to accept any advice from any American diplomat.

Can you blame them?

Kerry is going to suggest that Israel should vigorously assist the Palestinian economy. He is going to plea with Israel not to enact measures that will make more Palestinians desperate. 

In fact, that is what the Israeli government insists on doing. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and even more so his Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon, are adamant in resisting the calls from the right to take harsher measures against the Palestinian population in the West Bank. Ya’alon reportedly had a meeting last week with Likud political operatives who were critical of what they thought was his over-mellow approach, and in that meeting, he was able to convince some of them that his way of doing things is the right way.

But with every attack and every Israeli killed, the pressure from within Israel for more aggressive means is building. And it is not just the attacks. When it comes to politicians, politics is also a point of great consideration. The more we hear about Netanyahu’s desire to expand his coalition — and after he was able to pass the budget such talk is in abundance — the more he will be criticized by his coalition’s right-wing partner, the Habayit Hayehudi Party and its leader, Naftali Bennett.

Bennett sees himself as a future prime minister of Israel and is not in awe of the current one. He also represents the party that has the support of many of the settlers, the community that is currently most exposed daily to Palestinian violence. Bennett would not agree to Israeli acceptance of the new situation of violent attacks against Israelis as the new normal. On Nov. 23, just 24 hours before the Kerry visit, he was giving advice to the prime minister — that is, talking to him through the airwaves — that was the opposite of the advice given by the secretary of state.

Prime minister of Israel — what a thankless job.

Netanyahu has to listen to the unworthy advice of Kerry because America is a great friend and because Israel, with all its disappointment with the Obama administration, has no better friend. Israel also asked for more financial assistance to bolster its defenses after the agreement with Iran, and beggars can’t be choosers. 

Netanyahu also has to listen to the unworthy advice of Bennett, because Habayit Hayehudi is a partner in Netanyahu’s coalition and because many of Netanyahu’s voters are natural supporters of the Bennett approach. With all of his disappointment with Bennett, Netanyahu currently has no substitute. He wants his coalition to survive, and Bennett is key to such survival. So, again, beggars can’t be choosers.

Seriously, advice from John Kerry? (or: The one thing on which Israelis and Palestinians agree) Read More »

A message of love and hope

Read my New Best Selling Book “How to Prepare for Old Age—-Without Taking the Fun Out of Life” (Amazon and Barnes and Noble) If you have a group that would like to have me speak & do a Book Signing contact me at Seymour.Otis@gmail.com

Power and money are the fruits of life…

But family and friends are roots of life…

We can manage without fruits, but we cannot stand without roots.

To all of my dear friends and readers of my Blogs I express my deep appreciation for the love, kind thoughts and words of friendship you have shared with me as you responded to my various writings over the past year..

This past year, which is slowly coming to a close has seen our country go through some challenging social, economic times but we must not forget that we have also have great accomplishments as well. Yes, life is filled with Happiness and Joy-pain and suffering, but we must always remain optimistic.

As we approach the year 2016 let us dedicate ourselves to achieving the following important goals:

1. Working diligently to strengthening our family and social relationships so that as we travel the journey of life it will be filled with love and joy.

2. Keeping our eyes and minds open to the wonderful opportunities that exist for persons of all ages so that the journey ends happily.

3. Teaching the young members of our families the true value of life and how to plan and live it in a way that will optimize their success along the way.

4. Reaching out to our neighbors, of whatever creed, color, religious affiliation or economic status in such a way as to demonstrate our love, compassion and concern for their welfare, as well..

My cousin Connie Williams sent me the following most inspiring quotation which I want to share with you:

“What is worse than losing your Eyesight?”

“Losing your Vision”

As  we watch with disbelief the events of this past month, let us ever be mindful that the answer to peace and joy is for all decent persons to have the vision and the desire to work both individually and together so that the coming days of our lives leaves a joyous legacy for those who follow us.

A message of love and hope Read More »

Dermer blasts world’s confusion on Islamic terror, treatment of Israel

The lineup of speakers at the Zionist Organization of America’s annual Louis D. Brandeis Awards dinner at the Grand Hyatt in NY Sunday evening, turned out to serve as the perfect venue for venting about Israel’s standing in the world and the offering of suggestions about the U.S. conducting the war on terror in the wake of the deadly terror attacks in Paris and in Mali.

The highlight of the dinner was when Sheldon and Miriam Adelson (“The two greatest Zionists in the World,” according to ZOA President Morton Klein) presented the “Adelson Defender of Israel Award” to Hollywood actor Jon Voight.

“Voight is the leading Zionist in the entire Hollywood genre, a giant among righteous gentiles and an extraordinary defender of Israel,” Sheldon said before presenting him the award, which he said “looks like a marriage certificate.”

Israel’s new Ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon addressed the crowd at the beginning of the event, describing his job as a defender of Israel’s policies as much harder than the work of Israel’s Ambassador Ron Dermer in Washington, DC. “I have to tell you, I have been here only six weeks, but it feels like six years,” he told the crowd that included top donors, politicians, and operatives, as well as hundreds of students, gathered in the ballroom. The UN Representative blasted the world body for referring to the wave of terrorism in Israel as a cycle of violence. “Let me be clear: there is no ‘cycle of violence.’ There’s only one side that is instigating violence and attacking Israelis for no reason other than the fact that they are Jews living in their historic homeland,” he stated.

Danon, who previously served as a minister in the Israeli government and as head of the World Likud, also made a point to declare, “We will not allow an international presence on Har Habayit – The Temple Mount. The Temple Mount is the heart of Jerusalem – our eternal and united capital.”

Ambassador Ron Dermer, who received the Dr. Bob Shillman Award for Outstanding Pro-Israel Diplomacy, delivered the keynote address. At the start of his speech, the Israeli Ambassador turned to Klein – an outspoken critic of the Obama administration – and quipped, “I have one request: every once and a while you need to get off the fence and tell the people what you really think – enough of this wishy-washiness back and forth.”

In his 30-minute speech, Dermer decried the world’s double standard when it comes to condemning terrorism directed at Israelis and its confusion in confronting ISIS and Islamic terrorism.

“Now that you’ve watched some of the 24/7news coverage, here is my question to all of you: by a show of hands, how many of you think the world has finally woken up? How many of you think the international community will now have the clarity to successfully prosecute this war and win it?” he asked the crowd. But no hands went up. “Zero, zero,” he joyously declared. “Well, I share your skepticism. Instead of clarity I see confusion – confusion over the nature of the enemy and confusion over the nature of terrorism.”

“The enemy has a name: it’s called Militant Islam. It’s not militant, it’s not Islam; it’s Militant Islam,” Dermer continued. “[But] it is not only important to define the enemy, it is important to defeat the enemy. And, once again, here I see confusion and [lack of] clarity. The main weapon of militant Islam today is terrorism, and to defeat them we must ensure that this weapon is neutralized. But to neutralize that weapon we must identify it. Terrorism is the deliberate targeting of non-combatants and is not defined by the identity of the perpetrator. Terrorism is an immoral weapon no matter what the circumstances… To counter them we need a moral antidote, we need moral outrage, and we need to deny terrorists any moral legitimacy for their actions… And here is where the world has totally and utterly failed.”

The Israeli Ambassador stressed that the world’s confusion is mostly notable with the “shameful treatment” of Israel. “Imagine what would happen if the international community said that the murderers in Paris and the French army in Syria were part of a ‘cycle of violence’ that had to stop,” he asserted. “Imagine what would happen if the UN Secretary General asked the French president and ISIS to act with restraint and work to restore calm.”

“The test … is not how [the world] responds to the terror attacks in Paris. It’s how it responds to the terror attacks in Jerusalem,” Dermer said. Adding, “When I see the Eiffel Tower lit up with Israeli Blue and White after a terror attack in Israel, then I will now that the world [has woken up and] finally gets it.”

Closing the evening was ZOA President Morton Klein. “We at ZOA will never be the ‘Sha! Shtil!’ (Hush! Quiet!) Jews of silence of the past,” he declared. “ZOA will blow, and blow, and blow its horn for the Jewish people of Israel.”

The event also featured former Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, who recently suggested that Christians should convert as many Jews possible. Klein called Bachmann the “Esther of our time” in his introductory remarks.

The National Democratic Council criticized the invitation of Bachmann. “What does ZOA have to say about Michelle Bachmann’s message that it’s more urgent than ever to convert as many Jews as possible to Christianity? Is that someone that they’d like to continue to stand shoulder to shoulder with?” the NJDC asked in an emailed statement.

Mort Klein told Jewish Insider that Bachmann apologized to him personally over the remarks, “and it was heartfelt.”

“She is an extraordinary friend of Israel and the Jewish people,” added Klein.

Dermer blasts world’s confusion on Islamic terror, treatment of Israel Read More »

Rubio talks national security in first TV ad

Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio on Sunday released his campaign’s first television ad that will begin running nationwide starting Tuesday.

The ad demonstrates Rubio’s commitment to defeating Islamic terrorism and keeping the United States secure, as the national debate shifted to national security after the deadly terror attacks in Paris last week.

In the 30-second ad, Rubio looks at the camera – in front of a black backdrop – and says, “This is a civilizational struggle between the values of freedom and liberty, and radical Islamic terror. What happened in Paris could happen here. There is no middle ground. These aren’t disgruntled or dis-empowered people. These are radical terrorists who want to kill us, because we let women drive, because we let girls go to school.”

“There can be no arrangement or negotiation. Either they win, or we do,” the ad concludes.

Rubio’s focus on the war on terror in his first TV introduction comes as 28 percent of Americans now call terrorism the top issue in their choice for president, according to a Washington Post/ABC News poll published over the weekend. Americans say by 59-37 that the U.S. is “at war with radical Islam.”

Boston Globe poll showed that 42 percent of Republican voters in the New Hampshire primary say “terrorism/national security” is now the most important issue facing the country. Rubio is in 2nd place after Trump, with 13% who think he’s “best equipped” to handle the U.S. response to the threat of ISIS.

In an appearance on Fox News Sunday, Rubio agreed that his foreign policy credentials have been given a boost with voters focusing more on national security in the aftermath of the deadly terror attacks. He also suggested that the attacks were a “positive development” for America.

“I obviously am not happy about the events from last week in Paris, but I think it’s a positive development that it suddenly has forced Americans to confront more carefully the issue of national security, because it is the most important thing a president will do and that is the most important function of the federal government,” Rubio told host Chris Wallace. “And I hope we focus on that more, not just for political advantage, but because the world has become a very dangerous place. It’s not just radical jihad. It’s the Chinese military buildup, it’s Russian aggression, it’s North Korea’s dozens of nuclear warheads, it’s Iran’s desire to acquire a nuclear weapon capability. These are all very real risks and we are eviscerating our military capabilities at a time when the world is growing more dangerous.”

“So, I’m glad we’re focusing on national security, and I feel very confident in my position and talking about those issues,” he added.

Rubio talks national security in first TV ad Read More »