fbpx

August 21, 2015

When the Hasidim come to Norman Rockwell country

The lazy days of August have a special flavor in the rolling hills of the Berkshires, in western Massachusetts.

The flowers are blooming in dazzling colors, the corn at roadside farm stands is delectably sweet, the lakes are refreshingly cool, and the area’s picturesque New England villages are chock-full of families wandering between antique shops, bookstores and ice cream parlors.

It’s real Norman Rockwell country.

But in recent years, the tide of summertime visitors has brought with it a new constituency not much seen before in these storied hills: haredi Orthodox Jews.

For the most part, the haredim seem to be heading to one place: Jiminy Peak, a ski resort along the Massachusetts-New York border. Like many such mountains, during the summer season it transforms into an adventure park replete with alpine slides, high-ropes courses, zip lines, mountain biking and scenic chairlift rides. But Jiminy Peak is unique in that it also features a kosher cafeteria for about three weeks in August, courtesy of Chabad of the Berkshires, along with regular prayer services and even separate swimming hours for men and women.

“This is really a service for the Jewish community, not necessarily a profit thing,” said Rabbi Levi Volovik of Chabad of the Berkshires, which is located about 20 minutes away in Pittsfield. “Jews started coming to Jiminy Peak and using our services, and our shul. As they started growing, Jiminy Peak requested our help to coordinate.”

This is the third consecutive summer that Chabad has operated the kosher cafeteria, which sells pizza, falafel, fries and ice cream (it’s cholov yisroel, a more stringent form of kosher dairy). A corner of the cafeteria is set aside as a makeshift synagogue and study hall, and there are Talmud classes in the evenings. Many of the Orthodox visitors stay at the all-suite Jiminy Peak Country Inn at the mountain’s base lodge, where every unit has a kitchenette.

“It’s nice and scenic and the kids are happy,” Chaya Klein of Lakewood, New Jersey, said during a recent visit with her husband and five children. “It’s very peaceful here.”

It’s not clear how Jiminy Peak became a stop on the haredi vacation circuit. Orthodox Jews long have summered in the Catskills. The Berkshires, an area steeped in WASPy culture, became popular among more liberal Jews several decades ago.

Whatever the reason, word about Jiminy Peak clearly has spread in the strictly Orthodox community.

“It definitely provides a lot of business for us,” said Katie Fogel, director of marketing for Jiminy Peak. “We don’t necessarily market to that segment. We started working with Chabad of the Berkshires because we noticed an increase in visits among that population and decided that we would partner with them to make it the best experience we could.”

On a recent August afternoon, young and old Jews and non-Jews alike waited in line for the mountain coaster. When boarding, the Orthodox men tucked their yarmulkes into their pockets to keep them from flying off during their high-speed descent down the track.

A Jiminy Peak staffer at the disembarkation point, a girl in her teens who was instructed by an administrator not to provide her name, told JTA that mountain staffers hadn’t been given any cultural sensitivity training.

“We don’t know anything about them,” she said of the haredi Jews. “I wish I did.”

At the chairlift, which whisks passengers to the top of Jiminy’s alpine slide, a teenage girl wearing a bright-orange staff T-shirt and khaki shorts hoisted a young boy with peyos sidecurls onto a chair. As they ascended, the boy’s father’s ritual fringes flapped in the air.

Families congregated around the bungee trampoline watching their little ones bounce up and down. Nearby, little children in big black velvet yarmulkes and matching outfits stared wide-eyed at screaming teens aboard the giant swing.

Most of the excitement seemed to be up on the high-ropes courses at the adventure park, which combine rope bridges, zip lines, cargo nets and other challenges up in the trees. About 20 feet in the air, a young girl in a long skirt and black stockings wearing a safety harness ventured out onto one of the airborne obstacles as her father waited behind her on a small wooden platform attached to a tree trunk. Her mother watched warily from below, rocking an infant on her hip and holding a stroller with her free hand. Behind her, dozens of young children romped around the playground, jabbering excitedly in Yiddish.

Menachem Tzvi Eisenberg, 18, came back to Jiminy Peak this summer after a visit last year with his grandparents. He said the adventure park is his favorite feature.

“The rope course made me feel very accomplished because I was scared,” said Eisenberg, a Lakewood native. “It’s very high up, and the ropes were shaky. It helped me overcome my fears. It showed me I could do this.”

When it rained on the second day of his visit, Eisenberg and his family tried two nearby bowling alleys and the Crane Museum of Papermaking, but they were all closed.

“What we planned Hashem didn’t want,” he said with a shrug.

Most of the Orthodox visitors on a recent August afternoon appeared to be from the Orthodox strongholds of Lakewood and Monsey, New York, but Orthodox groups and camps also organize bus excursions to the mountain. Many visitors come for just a night or two, loading their minivans with kosher food and sundries they can eat without having to kosherize the kitchens in their hotel. Their visits are practically all midweek; the mountain’s rides violate Sabbath-day restrictions.

Orthodox Jews are hardly the only visitors to Jiminy Peak in summer, but the hills are alive with the sound of Yiddish especially during the peak Orthodox vacation season, after the three-week mourning period of Tisha b’Av, which this year fell on July 26. The kosher food operation at the mountain run by Chabad is open this summer until Aug. 26, and the rides at Jiminy will stay open until late October.

Then, in November, the mountain reopens for skiing.

When the Hasidim come to Norman Rockwell country Read More »

Obama’s Democrats face intense pressure as they weigh Iran deal

As he weighed whether to support President Barack Obama's nuclear deal with Iran, Representative Donald Norcross was showered with the sort of attention rarely shown to junior members of the U.S. Congress.

The New Jersey Democrat, a former labor union leader, met with Obama and other Democrats twice in the White House. He listened to briefings by Secretary of State John Kerry, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz and senior Defense Department officials.

He took an all-expenses-paid trip to Israel, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spent two hours with him and 21 other Democratic lawmakers, picking out faults in the agreement that Israel opposes. Voters from Norcross's south New Jersey district flooded his office with phone calls and emails and buttonholed him in person.

On Tuesday, Norcross said he would oppose the deal on the grounds that it does not go far enough to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. All the attempts at persuasion gave him the information he needed to make up his mind, he said, adding that the politics of the debate weren't a factor.

“People really know at a gut level that if anybody tries to bring politics into it, (that's) way off base,” he said in an interview with Reuters.

As the minority party, Norcross and his fellow Democrats are often sidelined on Capitol Hill. But over the past month they have been the targets of a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign as they weigh one of the most consequential foreign-policy decisions in years.

The intense pressure appears to have made the outcome of next month's votes on the deal closer than expected as some Democrats are persuaded to break ranks with Obama.

Congress, where majority Republicans overwhelmingly oppose the deal, is expected to reject the pact next month. But Obama will still be able to save the agreement if he can deny opponents in either house the two-thirds majority needed to override his expected veto.

The fate of the deal now hinges on the votes of the 18 Democratic senators and roughly 100 Democratic House members who have yet to say how they will vote.

The U.S.-led international agreement reached in July would put new limits on Iran's nuclear program in exchange for lifting crippling economic sanctions on the country.

On one side of the lobbying effort are progressive groups who back Obama's view that the deal is the best chance to avoid another Middle East war. On the other side, with a larger war chest, are many Jewish-American groups that say the deal has dangerous loopholes and fear it will empower Iran and ultimately leave Israel vulnerable to nuclear attack.

Norcross came out against the deal at a synagogue in his district, where he was joined on stage by an Israeli official and a lobbyist for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), a powerful pro-Israel group that opposes the pact.

Many members of that congregation who normally support Obama oppose him on this issue, according to its leader.

“This is a chasm that can't be bridged,” said Rabbi Ephraim Epstein of Congregation Sons of Israel in Cherry Hill, New Jersey.

REPUBLICAN OPPOSITION

White House officials privately expect they will be able to round up the 146 votes needed in the House to keep the deal alive, and are cautiously confident about the Senate as well.

In the Senate, 26 of the chamber's 44 Democrats have said they support the deal and two have said they will oppose it, according to a Reuters tally.

That means opponents of the deal need to win over at least 11 of the 18 senators who remain undecided.

“I would say we have a fighting chance,” said former Democratic Senator Joseph Lieberman, who is making calls while recovering from knee surgery on behalf of Citizens for a Nuclear Free Iran, an interest group that opposes the deal.

“It's not out of reach, but we're not kidding ourselves,” Lieberman told Reuters.

Democrats still on the fence face intense public pressure.

Lieberman's group, which is funded by AIPAC, plans to spend up to $40 million in its campaign to kill the deal. The group has run TV ads in at least 23 states, according to public filings compiled by the Sunlight Foundation, a watchdog group.

It has taken out billboards in New York's Times Square praising Charles Schumer – the Senate's No. 3 Democrat – for opposing the deal and chastising Senator Kirsten Gillibrand for backing it.

Another AIPAC affiliate paid for Norcross's trip to Israel earlier this month, which was planned before the deal was complete. Most of the other 21 Democratic House members on the trip have yet to announce their position on the deal.

Secure America Now, another advocacy group that opposes the deal, has bought ads on the messaging service Snapchat to sway Maryland Senator Ben Cardin. The group's supporters have generated 2,400 calls to his office and 3,500 calls to his top staffer, according to spokesman Vincent Harris.

The group has also used Twitter to target undecided members like New Jersey Senator Cory Booker.

“I have never had my cell phone blow up and my email account blow up as much as it is now,” Booker said on a conference call with Jewish-American groups on Thursday.

J Street, a liberal Jewish-American group that backs the deal, is running TV ads in nine states and has enlisted former Israeli security officials to speak to undecided Democrats.

CREDO Action, another liberal group that backs the deal, says its members have placed 49,000 phone calls and organized dozens of meetings with lawmakers and staff.

Norcross's decision to oppose the deal has given new ammunition to Alex Law, a progressive Democrat who is mounting a long-shot bid to unseat him in the 2016 primary election.

“He should be supporting our president,” Law told Reuters.

Norcross said even a personal appeal from the president probably wouldn't have changed his mind.

“What bit of information that I don't have already could he have brought to light?” he told Reuters.

Obama’s Democrats face intense pressure as they weigh Iran deal Read More »

White House: Islamic State second-in-command killed in U.S. air strike

The second-in-command of the Islamic State militant group was killed during a U.S. air strike in Iraq on Tuesday, the White House said on Friday, dealing a blow to the group that has sought to form a caliphate in the Middle East.

“Fadhil Ahmad al-Hayali, also known as Hajji Mutazz … was killed in a U.S. military air strike on August 18 while traveling in a vehicle near Mosul, Iraq, along with an ISIL media operative known as Abu Abdullah,” White House spokesman Ned Price said in a statement.

“Al-Hayali's death will adversely impact ISIL's operations given that his influence spanned ISIL's finance, media, operations, and logistics,” Price said, referring to the group by an acronym.

The White House said the dead leader was a “primary coordinator” for moving weapons, explosives, vehicles, and people between Iraq and Syria. He was in charge of operations in Iraq and helped plan the group's offensive in Mosul in June of last year.

The United States and its allies stage daily air strikes on Islamic State targets in the group's self-declared caliphate in Iraq and Syria. A drone strike last month killed a senior Islamic State leader in its Syrian stronghold of Raqqa.

One counter-terrorism specialist cautioned that the impact of the killing on Islamic State could be short-lived.

“My experience in looking at the Islamic State suggests they have demonstrated … an ability to move people up into positions” when high-ranking operatives are killed, said Seth Jones, a former Pentagon official now at the RAND Corporation.

Jones said how much territory Islamic State controls was more important in determining the group's power. “The key issue is territorial control,” he said.

White House: Islamic State second-in-command killed in U.S. air strike Read More »

Ben and Jerry support the Iran deal

Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, the men behind the iconic Ben & Jerry’s ice cream brand, have never shied away politics. For instance, they recently endorsed fellow Jew Sen. Bernie Sanders for president (and even toyed with the idea of giving the Independent from Vermont his own original ice cream flavor).

This week the frozen confection legends dipped their toes into one of the most hotly contested issues among Jews today: the Iran nuclear deal.

Cohen and Greenfield wrote in an email newsletter from liberal nonprofit policy group MoveOn that they support the Iran deal because they believe it will keep the U.S. “out of another war in the Middle East.”

“This agreement is the only peaceful way to keep Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. And it’s a critical test for what sort of nation we’re going to be,” they wrote in the Wednesday newsletter. “As Senator Bernie Sanders says, ‘the test of a great nation is not how many wars it can engage in, it is how it can resolve international conflicts in a peaceful manner.’”

Cohen and Greenfield also explained that they have launched a “donor strike” against Democratic lawmakers who have come out against the deal. Those who sign the donor strike petition through MoveOn pledge to withhold donations to Democrats who have said they will vote the deal down, such as Jewish New York Sen. Chuck Schumer.

“MoveOn members collectively contribute boatloads of money to Democrats each year—mostly in modest chunks like $5, $25, or $50,” Cohen and Greenfield wrote. “But it adds up to millions.”

As of Wednesday,Cohen and Greenfield said that 25,000 MoveOn members had signed the pledge and agreed to withhold a collective $11 million. Maybe the strikers are putting that money towards buying pints of Ben & Jerry’s Cherry Garcia or Chunky Monkey instead.

Ben and Jerry support the Iran deal Read More »

Poroshenko to visit Israel for first time as Ukraine president

In a move that may anger Russia, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly scheduled to visit Ukraine soon and host its president in Jerusalem.

Ukraine’s ambassador to Israel, Hennadii Nadolenko, announced the plans for the visits in an op-ed published this week ahead of Ukraine’s 24th independence day, on Aug. 24.

“We expect in the near future a visit by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Kiev, and by Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to Jerusalem, in a new milestone in bilateral relations that will further deepen cooperation between the two countries in all spheres of mutual interest,” Nadolenko wrote in his op-ed, which was reproduced on Wednesday by the news site evreiskiy.kiev.ua.

Resisting American and Russian pressure, Israel under Netanyahu has remained tight-lipped and neutral on the bloody conflict that, after Ukraine’s 2013 revolution, erupted between that country and Russia. That year, Ukraine’s former president, Viktor Yanukovych, was swept from power by revolutionaries who accused him of being a corrupt Kremlin stooge.

Russia then invaded Ukraine and annexed the Crimea, citing concern for minorities under the country’s new leadership, which Russia has accused of being a terrorist-harboring, pro-fascist regime.

Poroshenko, who was elected last year and has not yet visited Israel as president, has accused Russia of land theft and state-sponsored terrorism over its arming and support for separatists in the breakaway regions of Donetsk and Lugansk, where they are engaged in a bloody war with Ukrainian government troops.

He came to Israel last year on a clandestine visit, in which he reportedly urged officials to support Ukraine in the conflict.

Israel has protested the planned sale of advanced Russian S-300 air defense missiles to Iran. In April, Israeli defense officials told the news site nrg.co.il that Israel may respond by selling arms to Ukraine and Georgia.

Poroshenko to visit Israel for first time as Ukraine president Read More »

Rosner’s Torah-Talk: Parashat Shoftim with Rabbi Jeffrey Kamins

Our guest this week is Rabbi Jeffrey Kamins, Senior Rabbi of the Emanuel Synagogue in Sydney. Rabbi Kamins received his BA in English Literature from Stanford University and his JD from Boalt Hall School of Law, practicing law in Los Angeles briefly before beginning rabbinic studies. After receiving his rabbinical ordination from the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion in the US, he arrived at Emanuel as assistant rabbi in 1989 and was appointed senior rabbi in 1999. Rabbi Kamins is an active member of the Sydney Jewish community. He is rabbinic advisor to Emanuel School, the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies, and the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.  He is a member of the Council of Masorti  Rabbis of Australia and the Council of Progressive Rabbis of Australia, Asia and New Zealand. He is a member of the board of the Shalom Institute, a Chaplin for the Australian Army, and one of the Jewish representatives for the Australian Religious Response to Climate Change.

This week's Torah Portion – Parashat Shoftim (Deuteronomy 16:18-21:9) – begins with instructions concerning the appointment of Judges and law enforcement officers. Moses commands the people of Israel to pursue Justice and to avoid corruption and favoritism. The portion also includes prohibitions of sorcery and Idolatry; rules concerning the appointment and the behavior of Kings; and many laws of war, including the demand to offer terms of peace before going out to war. Our discussion focuses on the explicit command to “not deviate” from the verdict of the priests “to the right or to the left” and on the questions this raises for a modern Jewish reader.

Our Past Discussions of Parashat Shoftim:

Rabbi Joshua Hammerman on  the controversial rules of war presented in the parasha.

Rabbi Rachel Kahn-Troster on the social justice agenda presented in the parasha and in book of Deuteronomy.

Rosner’s Torah-Talk: Parashat Shoftim with Rabbi Jeffrey Kamins Read More »

Our fight over Iran: Kishkes vs Sechel

The Jewish community is used to intense internal debates, but our fight over the Iran nuclear deal has taken us to new levels of divisiveness. Why is that?

The first and easy answer is that this is an existential issue, especially for Israel. When an anti-Semitic regime that calls for the destruction of Israel threatens to obtain the nuclear weapons to accomplish that goal, well, some hysterics are justified.

Fear of evil is the core emotion that is driving our fight. Billions of dollars have been invested over the past few decades memorializing past Jewish impotence in the face of evil. The Holocaust industry has engraved on the soul of every Jew the eleventh commandment that “never again” will we allow ourselves to march to our slaughter. And yet, here we are, eight decades later, facing a sworn enemy that could slaughter us more efficiently than ever — not with gas chambers but with nuclear weapons.

This potential horror has triggered two Jewish impulses — our kishkes and our sechel. Our kishkes impulse is our gut feel, and what drives it is an instinct to never trust our enemies. For many of us who oppose the Iran nuclear deal, this mistrust of evil dominates other sentiments.

The sechel impulse comes from our rational minds. This is the side that calmly calculates risks and trade-offs. For many who support the Iran deal, the sechel impulse has led them to conclude that, all things considered, even if the Iran deal is not ideal, it's the “least bad” alternative.

Each impulse has its vocabulary. The kishkes impulse loads up on the vocabulary of evil and danger, the sechel impulse on the vocabulary of reason.

The kishkes impulse makes it hard for many of us to endorse the Iran deal, because we see it as honoring and empowering evil. We have no doubt that Iran will rake in all the money, continue its reign of terror and take advantage of multiple loopholes to build its nuclear bomb behind our backs. In fact, Iran is the author of these many loopholes — it negotiated them. It knows that the American/Western side is not evil and will not cheat. In short, our kishkes tell us this agreement will not hold because evil holds most of the cards.

Our sechel impulse forces us to grit our teeth and consider the alternatives. This makes it easier to endorse the Iran deal, because we conclude that if the deal blows up in Congress, we'll be left with worse alternatives. These include Iran rushing to build the bomb without restrictions, the sanctions regime imploding or America being dragged into another war.

Our kishkes tell us not to trust the deal and live with the consequences; our sechel tells us to trust the deal because of the consequences.

What makes our fight over the deal even more charged is when there is crossover — when, for example, an expert uses only sechel to argue against the deal. The best example I've seen of this is from Mark Dubowitz of Foreign Policy, who makes a rational case that the best alternative is for Congress to reject the deal and push for a better one. This is how he opens his argument: 

“The Iran nuclear deal is a ticking time bomb. Its key provisions sunset too quickly, and it grants Iran too much leverage to engage in nuclear blackmail. To defuse it, Congress needs to do what it has done dozens of times in the past including during the Cold War in requiring changes to key U.S.-Soviet arms control agreements: Demand a better deal. And contrary to the President Barack Obama's threats, this doesn't have to lead to war.”

Not an ounce of kishkes.

Similarly, many on the “pro” side have expressed a genuine mistrust and fear of Iran's evil regime, and have recommended moves to mitigate and contain this evil after the deal goes through. That's their kishkes speaking.

What we're left with is an emotional, complicated and messy communal fight where each side can rationalize why it owns the truth. If your kishkes is telling you that this deal endangers the world and especially the six million Jews in Israel, and that the Iranians will cheat so much that they will make a mockery of the agreement, it's hard to engage with a fellow Jew who believes it's a good deal.

But if your sechel is telling you that the real disaster is to blow up the deal in Congress and risk an even more dangerous and uncertain outcome, it's hard to engage with a fellow Jew who doesn't share this view.

In the end, though, what will matter the most is not sechel or kishkes but outcome, and the very likely outcome is that President Obama will get the 34 percent support he needs in Congress for the deal to win the day.

That outcome will certainly upset me, and a new chapter in the drama will begin, but there's another outcome I'm worried about. I'm worried that regardless of which way the vote in Congress goes, this current fight could leave behind permanent scars and divisions within our community. As much as I'm against the Iran deal, I'm also against the idea that we can allow our ideological differences to break us apart.

And that's my kishkes and my sechel speaking.


David Suissa is president of TRIBE Media Corp./Jewish Journal and can be reached at davids@jewishjournal.com.

Our fight over Iran: Kishkes vs Sechel Read More »

Dangerous “Wolf” Crying

In my twenty seven years at the Anti-Defamation League, most of my professional life, I became an expert on anti-Semitism; recognizing and combatting it whether in its blatant or its subtler forms. Equally importantly, acknowledging its “>protests).

Given my long experience with the issue of bigotry, I am saddened by the language employed by some in the Jewish community leadership in accusing the president and those who speak in favor of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA—the nuclear arms agreement with Iran) of flirting (and worse) with anti-Semitism. It is a charge that is incendiary and unwarranted.

However one views the JCPOA, support or opposition, the desire to mute the proponents of the JCPOA by playing the “anti-Semitism” card is inappropriate. Other than one nasty anti-Semitic cartoon that appeared in the Daily Kos, a hard-left web publication, attacking Sen. Charles Schumer for his decision to oppose the JCPOA, there has not been anti-Semitism of any significance evidenced in the rhetoric of the main proponents of the deal (e.g. the White House and its allies).

The remarks of the president that seem to have aroused the ire of the JCPOA opponents the most and has been the hook on which they base their “he’s legitimizing anti-Semitism” charge were spoken during his appearance on Jon Stewart’s Daily Show. While discussing the JCPOA he “>article urging an Israeli attack on Iranwas recently reprinted) Bill Kristol, and Sen. Joe Lieberman—among the leaders of the neo-con movement and supporters of the Iraq war in 2003— are similarly situated in being against the JCPOA today. The president said “some of the same politicians” and, indeed, some are.

He didn’t list them by name, he didn’t refer to ““>Buchanan did—“kids with names like McAllister, Murphy, Gonzalez, and Leroy Brown were going to do the fighting”), one could, justifiably, take umbrage. But he didn’t.

The absence of anti-Semitism and the benign nature of the president’s remarks have not constrained a host of Jewish leaders from attacking JCPOA supporters and advocates for engaging in “dog whistle” bigotry, for supporting a deal that “will lead to Israel’s destruction,” for “anti-Jewish incitement” etc. The list of major Jewish organizations purveying those themes is embarrassingly long.

These critics are arguing by hysterics based not on what has been said, but on how what has been said might be misinterpreted or misused—–how inferences might be drawn that opponents of the plan don’t like.

Arguing that accurate, unbiased comments about the tactics that an opponent uses in a heated political altercation are “hinting” at bigotry or may be misread in “the eyes of many in the community” or might “fuel anti-Semitic stereotypes” is absurd as part of a public policy debate. If the comments are accurate, if they don’t invoke or hint at bigoted tropes or imagery, and if they are measured, then they are part of the rough and tumble of the political world.

Newton had it right in the 17th century in his Third Law of Motion—for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If Jewish community organizations, the Israeli prime minister and its ambassador to the United States push hard against the JCPOA and warn of imminent catastrophe were it adopted they should have expected, indeed it could have been guaranteed, that there would be a firm and unambiguous response in the high stakes game of geo-politics—-that’s not bigotry, that’s reality.

Dangerous “Wolf” Crying Read More »

Bar Refaeli cancels Istanbul gig following anti-Israel campaign

The organizer of an Istanbul fashion show that was supposed to feature Israeli top model Bar Refaeli denied reports that she cancelled her participation due to safety concerns.

The cancellation of Refaeli’s participation at the Laleli Fashion Shopping Festival, which is due to open on Aug. 24, was announced Wednesday, and attributed to health reasons. But the Israeli news site nrg.co.il, citing acrimonious rhetoric against the invitation, reported that organizers beefed up security amid the controversy over Refaeli’s planned attendance.

“There is no safety issue that I know of,” Giyasettin Eyyupko, the president of the organization behind the festival, LASIAD, was quoted on Thursday by the news site aktifmedya.com as saying during a news conference. He said Refaeli would attend a different event at a later date. “Naturally, there are legal steps that can be taken, but we decided not to because the reason for her failure to attend is understandable, that is all I can say,” Eyyupko reportedly said.

Conservative media in Turkey, including the Islamist Yeni Akit daily, referred to Refaeli as “the Zionist model” quoting activists who called her invitation a “betrayal.” The paper blurred her picture, which adorned the organizers banner for the event. It also published an op-ed criticizing the ruling AKP party fdor allowing the event.

The news site aktifmedya.com and other Turkish media reported she would receive the equivalent of 700 billion Turkish liras, or a little over $2 billion, but other media reported the figure was closer to $2 million.

The conservative news site haber10.com reported that the local Istanbul-area municipality of Fatih came under pressure for its sponsorship of the event, and that it responded in a statement stating the organizers have cancelled the model’s attendance.

Haber10.com also published on Wednesday an article about Refaeli’s message of support on Facebook for Israeli troops fighting in Gaza last year. The article was titled “the bloodcurdling message of the unscrupulous Israeli model.”

Separately, a band of street musicians was assaulted in Istanbul last week by a man dressed in traditional Muslim garb who accosted them for playing “Jewish music” and warned them that he would “punish them as a Muslim,” the news site birgun.net reported Monday. Two other men unleashed two dogs on the musicians, according to the report.

Bar Refaeli cancels Istanbul gig following anti-Israel campaign Read More »

Obama builds Iran nuclear deal support one vote at a time

President Barack Obama is gradually building support in Congress for an international nuclear deal with Iran, working the phones to counter lobbying against the pact and sending a letter to lawmakers urging them to support it.

Obama needs to win the backing of one-third of either the House of Representatives or the Senate to prevent Republicans from killing the nuclear deal announced in July.

Signed by world powers and Iran, the agreement would require Tehran to abide by new limits on its nuclear program in return for western governments easing economic sanctions.

According to a Reuters tally, Obama is eight votes away from capturing one-third of the Senate, or 34 senators, with about a month remaining to find the additional support he needs.

The Bipartisan Policy Center, which is tracking lawmakers' positions, said on Thursday that 69 House members now support the Iran deal, with another 140 in the 435-member chamber still undeclared. Obama would need the support of at least 146 House members to safeguard the agreement in that chamber.

Even though Congress is on a five-week summer recess and Obama is vacationing in Martha's Vineyard, the White House has kept up pressure on the president's fellow Democrats to provide him with enough support when Congress casts votes in September.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican, this month told a Kentucky newspaper that the battle in Congress “is stacked in the president's favor.”

In a letter to colleagues on Friday, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said she was confident Democrats would prevent an override of a veto by Obama of a measure to kill the agreement.

Obama reiterated his case for the deal in an Aug. 19 letter to legislators that was released by the White House. Reacting to the letter, Democratic Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York on Friday said he would “support the agreement and vote against a resolution of disapproval.”

Representing a New York City district with a large Jewish population, Nadler could help sway other House Democrats.

His move contrasts with other liberal Jewish Democrats from the New York region, such as Senator Charles Schumer and Representatives Elliot Engel and Steve Israel, who have announced their opposition.

In days ahead, much attention will focus on senators Benjamin Cardin and Barbara Mikulski, both senior Democrats from Maryland who have not yet staked out a position.

Obama builds Iran nuclear deal support one vote at a time Read More »