fbpx

August 13, 2015

Bringing Kindness into the Workplace

My first job out of college was at a major corporation. I was only spoken to when I was needed for a task. There was no community, no warmth, no love. I felt like a cog, akin to something out of Lang’s Metropolis; I was just a part of a cold machine. After a few months,  I ran for the hills never to return to a similar workplace.

For the past generation, there has been a persistent corporate measuring of “winners and losers,” divided solely by those who have money and those who do not, with the assumption that it is natural for the “losers” to fall by the wayside. The law of the jungle appears to be not only inevitable, but desirable. Americans are burnt out from working so hard. Our workforce is becoming increasingly competitive, demanding, and draining. From morning rush hour until beyond the end of the workday, the motto seems to be: “Nice guys finish last.”

Those demands aren’t going to change any time soon, but what if we injected a bit more kindness into our work environment, so that we did not have such an ingrained “dog eat dog” atmosphere? In the summer of 2013, scholars from diverse backgrounds met at Stanford University to discuss the notion of compassion in the workplace. Business graduate Dr. Olivia O’Neill noted that “people are particularly likely to catch the emotions of their leaders.” Thus, if a CEO is particularly lacking in compassion, this will filter down to the employees, and will increase the tendency toward employee burnout, which will hurt the company’s performance. At the conference, Stanford Assistant Professor of Psychology Jamil Zaki stated that companies tend to follow a policy of “attention, selection, and attrition,” so if a company has compassion it will likely attract employees who are kind and generous, fostering cooperation. National University of Singapore Business School Associate Professor Jayanth Narayanan pointed out that, in spite of the belief that forgiveness shows weakness, we admire many leaders such as those who chose forgiveness over vengeance, Monandas Gandhi and Nelson Mandela for example. Professor Kristin Neff of the University of Texas discussed her research, which demonstrated that, contrary to what many in management believe, overwhelmingly negative feedback does not motivate employees. Rather than leading to more productivity, constant negative feedback leads to a defensive response; employees respond much better to feedback that is three- to five-times more positive than negative.

In addition to being a moral decision, compassion in the workplace may be a strategic move as well. Three years ago, the New York Times reported that kindness increases productivity in profound ways.

Researchers at Wharton, Yale and Harvard have figured out how to make employees feel less pressed for time: force them to help others. According to a recent study, giving workers menial tasks or, surprisingly, longer breaks actually leads them to believe that they have less time, while having them write to a sick child, for instance, makes them feel more in control and ‘willing to commit to future engagements despite their busy schedules.’ The idea is that completing an altruistic task increases your sense of productivity, which in turn boosts your confidence about finishing everything else you need to do.

There are signs of positive change. Surveys of millennials tend to show that a majority do not want the traditional high salary corporate job, with one study showing that 74 percent expressed a preference for working collaboratively in small groups. A startup company dedicated to exploring societal issues in new ways, Creating the Future, has embraced the principles of compassion, making it the responsibility of all to look out for one another: “…It is our collective responsibility to figure out how to support and bring out the best in that person and the situation.” Thus, employees who feel burnout will be treated with compassion instead of being cast out as useless drones; this is an experiment worth emulating.

I often think back to how spiritually drained I felt when I left work each night from my cold corporate position. I wasn’t empowered enough to proactively inject acts of kindness into the workplace. Now, however, I realize how many people suffer in their day jobs—living to work rather than working to live—only to come home to stressful domestic and family demands. To reverse the trend each of us, in our way, can make a difference by making our workplace a more enjoyable, warm, and thoughtful environment.

The Torah fervently stressed the importance of honoring the dignity of workers and the rabbinic tradition went even further to tell stories of righteous people who helped their employees and co-workers.

Every day, all the other workers and I pool our food, and eat it. But today, I saw that there was one man who had no bread and he was ashamed. So I told all the other men, ‘Today, I will collect the food.’ When I came to that man, I pretended to take bread from him, so that he should not be ashamed, (Shabbat 156b).

As Jews, we must serve as model employers and co-workers teaching that the workplace is not merely a place to make money but a place to build compassionate relationships. Those bonds will not only improve our quality of work but will enhance the workplace to be a place of dignity.

 

Rabbi Dr. Shmuly Yanklowitz is the Executive Director of the Valley Beit Midrash, the Founder & President of Uri L’Tzedek, the Founder and CEO of The Shamayim V’Aretz Institute and the author of eight books on Jewish ethics.

Bringing Kindness into the Workplace Read More »

Podcast news and reviews – 8/14/15

Highlights from the week of August 14, 2015:

  • Here's The Thing With Alec Baldwin “Paul Simon” – I'm not sure if Paul Simon appeared on a podcast before this appearance, but based on this episode, I must assume that was the case. Alec Baldwin always asks great questions to guests, and things got awkward very quickly during this interview. Three minutes in Paul Simon refutes the idea of him being a perfectionist, and around 14 minutes in, he questions who wrote the questions being asked. Two very interesting legends are at work on this episode. (http://www.wnyc.org/shows/heresthething“>https://soundcloud.com/gilbertgottfried)
  • The Pauly Shore Podcast Show “Ep 21 – Chris Kattan” – Say what you want about Pauly Shore as an actor and comic, but his family is responsible for countless stand-up icons via their ownership of The Comedy Store. In turn, Pauly's podcast guests are usually fantastic. Unfortunately, this episode with Chris Kattan is an example of what happens when you have a host that does not listen actively, as paired with a guest that does not want to be open about his problems. But for the last half of the episode, Comedy Store talent booker Adam Eget is interviewed and he interestingly explains his process behind selecting talent for the legendary venue. (“>http://podcastone.com/Bret-Easton-Ellis-Podcast)
  • Comedy Bang Bang “#367: Bits, Riffs, and Friendships” – For those who have never listened to the Scott Aukerman-hosted Comedy Bang Bang, it is one of the funnier podcasts out there, yet also one of the most meta podcasts. This episode's guests are Tim Heidecker (from Tim & Eric), Brett Gelman (from Married and Another Period) and Jon Daly (from Kroll Show). The three guests, all excellent improvisers, spend the episode feuding and then making up quite a few times. Expect a lot of laughs and a lot of absurdity as no other podcast is like this — please disregard what Brett Gelman says he does to critics' reviews, however. (Darren@Paltrowitz.com if there are any podcast highlights I may have missed.

Podcast news and reviews – 8/14/15 Read More »

Over 111 terrorist attacks stopped in West Bank, Jerusalem in 2015

Israeli security forces said they prevented 17 suicide attacks and eight kidnappings so far in 2015, in addition to several attacks stopped by the Palestinian Authority.

Five of the 17 attacks that the Shin Bet reported stopping were planned by Hamas members, five were planned by other groups and the remaining seven were not affiliated with any organization, the Times of Israel reported Wednesday.

Unaffiliated terror cells are growing in number and tend to be difficult for security services to monitor, according to the Times of Israel.

In total, Israel has prevented 111 attempted terrorist attacks in 2015, more than half of them planned by members of Hamas. Nearly all the thwarted attacks targeted Israelis in the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem.

Over 111 terrorist attacks stopped in West Bank, Jerusalem in 2015 Read More »

Wearing my kippah in Italy, and feeling fine

During my four months studying in Italy in the fall of 2007, you could say I had more than my fair share of strange Jewish experiences.

Running late for a train one morning in Florence, I decided the best course of action would be to lay tefillin in the station’s janitor’s closet — only to have a policeman threaten to arrest me for trespassing. Lost in Rome one Friday afternoon, a Smart car pulled up alongside me, a 17-year-old leaned out the window and — in Hebrew — invited me to jump in. He dropped me at my hostel, blocks away from his synagogue.

And at the end of my semester, my Jewish classmate and I made the stunningly idiotic decision, eight nights in a row, to prop a lit menorah up on a can of liquid plaster on the second floor of a centuries-old palazzo. I’m still relieved it didn’t burn down.

But one thing I never experienced was anti-Semitism, even as I wore my kippah everywhere, every day. I was physically or verbally accosted that year in Barcelona, Budapest, Paris and Prague. But from a Florentine street of Arab merchants to the northern city of Cremona, no Italian ever seemed to treat me worse for being Jewish.

Back in Italy this week for work, I wanted to see if things had changed. In recent years, strong anecdotal evidence, data on rising anti-Semitism and urgings from European Jews had convinced me to take my kippah off while on the continent.

Would Italy be the same? Reports of anti-Semitism, after all, had risen there too. I decided to use myself as a test subject: I kept my kippah on and waited to see what would happen.

The answer: nothing.

Instead, I found a surprising self-confidence among Italian Jews that had been absent in my visits to Paris, Madrid and Kiev, Ukraine. Over the course of a week, I meet with Jews of all stripes in three different cities — not one suggested I hide my head covering or told me to watch out.

An armored car and a soldier sat outside major synagogues, but they weren’t guarding a frightened community. When Italian Jews did mention local anti-Semitism, they dismissed it as either a fringe phenomenon or tied it to recent events in Israel. Italians, they said, had no beef with their Jewish neighbors.

In Milan, a Chabad rabbi strode smiling through the central train station fully clad in hat, coat and beard. In Florence, I went to Ruth’s kosher restaurant, my old haunt, only to find there were no free tables — though they were mostly filled with tourists. And in Rome, home to Italy’s largest Jewish population, I found a thriving community.

A cobblestone avenue in the old Jewish ghetto is lined with 10 kosher establishments serving traditional Italian dishes and Israeli food. When I walked into a nearby cafe for an afternoon espresso, the barista made sure to tell me the food wasn’t kosher. Down the street, a large Israeli flag hung from a building alongside European Union and Italian flags, over tourists speaking loudly in Hebrew and Orthodox Jewish locals wearing long skirts or kippahs. In an alley, a Chabadnik solicited passersby to put on tefillin.

Policemen, waiters, bellhops and cabbies treated me no differently than in New York or Tel Aviv. Telling people where I lived elicited no special reaction. By the end of the trip, I’d settled back into forgetting my kippah was on.

Then, on my last day, someone tapped me on the shoulder and asked about it. Bracing myself, I turned around to find an older Roman man. He just wanted to know how my kippah stayed on.

I showed him my clips and prepared to exit the bus. But before I left, he made sure to tell me his father, a devout Catholic, had worked with many Jewish vendors in business over the years. Of all his associates, he said, they were the most honest.

And with that, he smiled, said, “Ciao, ciao” and sent me on my way.

Wearing my kippah in Italy, and feeling fine Read More »

Can the U.S. trust Europe to punish Iran should it violate nuclear deal?

Among his rationales for opposing the nuclear deal with Iran, U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer said that he did not trust the three European Union partners to punish Iran should it violate the terms of the accord that offers the Islamic Republic sanctions relief in exchange for scaling back its nuclear activities.

The New York Democrat’s assertion served as a reminder that while Washington has been the driving force behind the deal, which was reached July 14 between Iran and six world powers, the agreement is an international one. Its implementation, therefore, will be determined in part by the foreign policies and interests of Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia.

“It is reasonable to fear that once the Europeans become entangled in lucrative economic relations with Iran, they may well be inclined not to rock the boat by voting to allow inspections” that would bring about renewed sanctions, Schumer wrote in an Aug. 6 statement.

(Russia and China are unlikely to introduce new obstacles to trade with Iran, judging by their apparent eagerness to sell arms to Tehran. Qasem Soleimani, an Iranian defense official who is still the subject of a United Nations travel ban over his country’s nuclear activities, reportedly traveled to Moscow to discuss, among other matters, the sale of air defense missiles. China, meanwhile, has agreed to provide Iran with 24 fighter jets in exchange for access to Iranian oil fields for the next 20 years, Taiwanese media reports have said.)

Schumer, the highest-ranking Jewish Democrat in the Senate, has said that he would vote against the deal in Congress, where it is expected to fail. President Barack Obama has vowed to veto any bill of disapproval, for which both houses of Congress would need a two-thirds vote to override.

Schumer’s stated concern about the European Union partners echoes warnings by critics of the deal who say that Europe’s fragile economies lack the discipline to cut trade with Iran should it violate the terms of the deal. But European supporters of the agreement argue that Europe has already proven its willingness to cut trade, and that Iran’s economic dealings will work to increase compliance, not diminish it.

“The resumption of an economic cooperation with the West will boost the gradual liberalization of the Iranian regime and allow it to respond to demands for democracy from civil society,” JCall, Europe’s liberal pro-Israel lobby, similar to J Street in the United States, wrote in a statement.

Europe’s recent track record suggests it has the discipline to walk away from Iranian money. When the European Commission first imposed sanctions against Iran in 2007, it cut a booming trade of 25 billion euros (then worth some $42 billion) between Iran and EU member states to around $7 billion last year.

Promoting stricter sanctions against Iran was easier for the United States, whose trade with Tehran — just $318 million in 2007 — is in any case limited by legislation set in place in the 1980s. (U.S. trade with Iran has gradually decreased since then to less than $1 million in imports and $186.5 in exports last year.)

But the economic situation in the European Union has worsened since 2007, with the union having been badly hurt by the global financial crisis the following year and struggling to maintain the integrity of its financial bloc and currency.

European leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, vowed to renew sanctions if Iran fails to comply. But with two of the three EU partners suffering from stagnant economies and rising unemployment, many share Schumer’s skepticism on whether this will actually happen.

“The sanctions are toast,” said Emanuele Ottolenghi of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a right-leaning think tank. Britain, France and Germany, he said, “are in no condition, economically speaking, to agree to implement sanctions once they are lifted.”

Even if they agree to lift such sanctions, the deal’s terms mean that such punitive steps would not apply to contracts signed before the sanctions’ re-introduction, Ottolenghi said, noting: “The result is a rush in Europe to sign contracts now, even if they are not immediately applied, just to make them sanctions-proof.

In 2007, Germany’s gross domestic product grew at a rate of 3.3 percent. It now stands at 0.1 percent. France went from a GDP growth rate of 2.4 percent in 2007 to 0.2 percent in 2014. Of the three EU partners, Britain alone has managed to restore its 2007 growth rate of 2.6 percent after the 2008 crash.

The deal does allow for the reimplementation of sanctions through the U.N. Security Council, even over the objections of other veto players. But doing so, analysts warned, could alienate allies and complicate the creation of a new coalition to impose sanctions — making the snapback option anything but snappy.

But in defense of the deal, J Street has maintained in statements that “the EU and US can snap back their own sanctions at any time if Iran does not meet its commitments.” The left-leaning pro-Israel lobby insisted that the terms of the deal mean sanctions will be snapped back “automatically” at the Security Council if Iran violates any part of the agreement and provided the United States and EU partners demand it.

Can the U.S. trust Europe to punish Iran should it violate nuclear deal? Read More »

Jewish Temple group launches Indiegogo campaign to breed sacred cow

It’s been nearly two millennia since the Second Temple in Jerusalem was destroyed, bringing to an end the priestly period of Jewish history and commencing the Diaspora.

A third Temple has been prophesied, and in preparation for the messiah, nonprofit Jewish group The Temple Institute wants to build it.

Last month, the institute launched a crowdfunding campaign on Indiegogo with the goal of raising $125,000 to breed a red heifer, a requirement for Temple purification rituals. It has already raised nearly $33,000 from some 500 donors.

“For 2,000 years we’ve been waiting for a perfect red heifer,” said Richman, an institute director in a video for the fundraising campaign. The project, he said, is “nothing less than the first stage of the reintroduction of biblical purity into the world, the prerequisite for the rebuilding of the holy Temple.”

In short, the pitch is: If we breed it, He will come.

Since 1987, The Temple Institute, located in the Old City of Jerusalem, has been committed to returning to the Jewish traditions of ancient times by constructing a Temple to exact biblical specifications.

The recipe to do so requires very specific ingredients, as relayed in the Torah and the Talmud. To date, the institute has said it has completed the sacred garments of the high priest, and last year, it successfully raised over $100,000 to make architectural plans for the Temple. Now for a biblical bovine.

“The challenge is to raise a red heifer according to the exact biblical requirements here in the Land of Israel,”said Richman in the video. “It’s time to stop waiting and start doing.”

In the Book of Numbers, the Israelites were commanded to use “a red heifer without spot, wherein is no blemish” as a ritual sacrifice whose ashes would be required for the priests’ sacred rites. Red heifers are extremely rare, according to Jewish tradition, with only a handful said to have ever existed.

The institute has been seeking such a cow since for nearly three decades, even collaborating with Evangelical American breeders. After identifying a few promising cows that ultimately didn’t pass muster, the institute is rolling up its sleeves.

Working with an Israeli cow herder, using “state-of-the-art technique” and “under strict rabbinical supervision,” the institute hopes to produce a herd of red heifers. From the herd, they will select a “proper candidate” to fulfill the commandment.

If this story sounds familiar, similar fictional organizations, also fixated on cultic cattle, are central to USA Network’s 2015 TV show “Dig” and Michael Chabon’s 2007 novel “The Yiddish Policemen’s Union.”

The Temple Institute has elected to run a Flexible Funding campaign, meaning it keeps all donations even if it does not hit its ultimate goal. Donor levels begin at $18, which earns the giver the satisfaction of knowing she’s done “a mitzvah.” At the highest level, $25,000, donors receive a private tour of the cattle ranch and updates on the status of the calf.

The project is controversial, of course. The site of the ancient Temples, and thus the prescribed site for the new one, is on Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, where sites holy to Muslims – the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa mosque – have stood for 13 centuries.

The Temple Institute has admitted that the mosques must be cleared for the building of the Temple to begin. (One peace-seeking group, however, thinks there’s room for everyone.)

Despite these sizable obstacles, some Israelis are supportive of the institute’s ultimate aim. Haaretz reported in 2013 that nearly a third of secular citizens surveyed in a poll supported the building of the Temple, and the numbers rise for religious Jews.

After the fundraising campaign is complete, the plan is for red cow embryos to be deposited in surrogate mother cows – what Haaretz referred to as essentially bovine Virgin Marys. When birthed nine months later, rabbis will determine if any of the offspring meet the strict kosher cow standards.

If so, they will be ritually sacrificed and burned at age 2, allowing newly purified priests to ascend the Temple Mount. Then, according to South Park, the holy wars begin.

Jewish Temple group launches Indiegogo campaign to breed sacred cow Read More »

The best and worst driving music, according to Israeli research

Israeli research has bad news for music lovers: When your favorite song comes on the radio, it may make you a worse driver.

Don’t despair, though, certain music may also improve your driving. That’s according to Israeli psychology professor Warren Brodsky.

“The research is irrefutable that listening to music in the car affects the way you drive,” especially if it’s a song you’re “involved with,” Brodsky said in a telephone interview last week. If a song jogs a memory or frequently changes tempo and volume, it’s distracting you from driving, he said.

Brodsky, director of music science research at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and a Philadelphia native, laid out his findings across 400-plus pages in his book, “Driving with Music: Cognitive-Behavioral Implications,” published in April.

Like texting, eating, putting on makeup or having a conversation, he warned, listening to music while driving is a potentially deadly distraction.

Whether it’s rap, hip-hop, classical or rock, music that gets you singing along or drumming the steering wheel could increase the risk that you’ll change lanes without realizing it or react too late to avoid a crash, Brodsky said.

Brodsky spoke from personal – not just academic – experience. He admitted there are songs that take him right back to his basic training in the Israeli military. An old hit comes on, and suddenly he’s reminiscing about the three years he spent in the Israel Defense Forces entertainment groups, playing electric bass guitar.

Other times, he said, a song he has never heard comes on the radio, and he’s more focused on the new lyrics than on the road.

“Driving with Music” is based on Brodsky’s 2013 study with co-researcher Zach Slor, which tracked 85 drivers ─ all teenagers who had been licensed for at least seven months.

The participants each drove with an observer six times for a total of more than four hours. While behind the wheel, they sometimes listened to their favorite music. On other trips, they listened to background music provided by the observer or no music at all.

When their favorite music was playing, the young drivers were involved in the greatest number of miscalculations, motor vehicle violations and incidents of aggressive driving, according to the study titled, “Background Music as a Risk Factor for Distraction among Young-Novice Drivers.”

Funded by the Israel National Road Safety Authority, the research focused on young drivers, because they tend have the most accidents and fatalities.

Fortunately, the findings don’t mean you need to have your car stereo removed. After all, doctors don’t tell patients with high cholesterol to stop eating, Brodsky noted. More to the point, he said drivers’ minds tend to wander without the help of background music.

Rather than cruising in silence, Brodsky suggested listening to well-balanced music without lyrics and with a steady rhythm and tempo. Even this kind of music shouldn’t be familiar, he said. (Maybe it’s time to get into Philip Glass.)

Such background music “allows us to stay in a certain kind of emotional place” without distracting from the road, he explained.

So “Hit the Road Jack.” Just try to remember, Brodsky said, “You are not jogging. You are not in a spinning class on a bike. You are in a car.”

The best and worst driving music, according to Israeli research Read More »

CrossFit guru does a handstand on Berlin’s Holocaust memorial

What happens when an intense CrossFit guru unknowingly stumbles across a Holocaust memorial? He does a handstand on it, of course.

Dave Driskell, a CrossFit coach whose thick beard would not look out of place in Brooklyn but who actually lives in Bali, Indonesia, was passing through Berlin last week and found the city’s Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe. He uploaded a picture of himself doing a handstand on one of the memorial’s concrete slabs for his nearly 70,000 Instagram followers and immediately invoked ire from the world of social media.

“Hello Berlin, Germany. 15 hour layover. Checking the sites. Drinking the beers. Eating the bratwurst. #vagabond #wanderlustwods #handstands #365daysofhandstands,” Driskell wrote, according to Buzzfeed. The post was later deleted.

For those who are not CrossFit enthusiasts, the “wod” in #wanderlustwods” means “workout of the day.”

Many people used the hashtag #inappropriate to chastise the self-described “Vagabond/Model,” the Huffington Post reported.

Driskell, who regularly travels the world to promote the CrossFit-style training (which involves short, high-intensity workouts), quickly Instagram-apologized after being informed that site of his latest stunt was a Holocaust memorial.

“I posted the picture using the wifi from a local cafe and then went back to exploring the city. It wasn’t until later tonight at the airport that I realized my error in understanding what this structure was,” Driskell wrote in the post. “Anyone who knows me, knows this is the complete opposite of what I would want.”

Driskell’s mistake calls to mind NBA basketball player Danny Green’s selfie from last fall at the same memorial. Green, a member of the San Antonio Spurs, used “lol” and #Holocaust in his caption. Needless to say, that didn’t go over well online either.

CrossFit guru does a handstand on Berlin’s Holocaust memorial Read More »

West Bank Bedouin tent burned down in suspected arson attack

A tent in a West Bank Bedouin village was set on fire in a suspected arson attack.

The tent in the village of Kafr Malik, located north of Ramallah, was burned completely early Thursday morning, according to reports. It had been used for storage and unoccupied at the time of the fire.

Graffiti spray-painted on a rock near the burned-down tent included a Star of David and the words “administrative revenge,” which could refer to the recent administrative detention orders for three suspected Jewish extremists. Under administrative detention, prisoners can remain in custody for up to six months without a hearing or charges, renewable indefinitely. Hundreds of Palestinian prisoners remain in administrative detention in Israeli prisons.

The suspected extremists were arrested after the July 31 arson attack on a West Bank Palestinian home that left a baby and his father dead. The West Bank village of Duma, where the attack occurred, is located about three miles from the Bedouin village where Thursday’s attack took place.

Later Thursday, three Jewish youths reportedly were arrested in the area in connection with the attack. The youths’ car also was seized and they were prohibited from meeting with an attorney.

West Bank Bedouin tent burned down in suspected arson attack Read More »

Prominent L.A. Jews announce support for Iran deal

Nearly 100 prominent Los Angeles Jews, many with close ties to the Hollywood entertainment industry, have affirmed their strong support for the Iran nuclear deal.

In a full-page ad in the Aug. 14 edition of the weekly Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, 98 signatories, identifying themselves as “American Jewish supporters of Israel,” declared, “We are united in saying that the negotiated deal on balance is good, that any available alternatives are worse, and that Congress killing the deal would be a tragic mistake.”

Among the lead signatories are renowned TV producer-writer Norman Lear, movie producers Mike Medavoy and Lawrence Bender, famed architect Frank Gehry and billionaire philanthropist Eli Broad.

Other signatories include “Mad Men” creator Matthew Weiner, “Game of Thrones” executive producer Carolyn Strauss, television director Daniel Attias, and agents Peter Benedek and Rick Rosen.

Also included are numerous rabbis, academicians and civic activists, many associated with the Israel peace movement and liberal causes.

Indicative of the interest and split opinions on the topic, the same issue of the Jewish Journal features six lengthy opinion articles on the subject, plus a cover story surveying the attitudes of the local Iranian-Jewish community.

Two of the Op-Eds continue a long-running debate on the deal between Rob Eshman, The Journal’s publisher and editor-in-chief (for), and David Suissa, president of TRIBE Media Corp./Jewish Journal (against).

The agreement reached last month between Iran and six world powers led by the United States provides economic sanctions relief for Iran in exchange for restrictions on its nuclear program.

Prominent L.A. Jews announce support for Iran deal Read More »