fbpx

June 29, 2015

California bill to limit vaccine exemptions goes to governor

California lawmakers on Monday sent Governor Jerry Brown a bill to substantially limit vaccine exemptions for school children in the most populous U.S. state, following last year's measles outbreak at Disneyland that sickened more than 100 people.

The bill, which would make California the third state to eliminate religious and other personal vaccine exemptions, passed the state Senate on a vote of 24-14 in its final form, which included amendments that would give some parents years to comply and make it easier for parents to obtain medical exemptions from doctors.

Brown, a Democrat, who had in the past opposed dropping the religious exemption, said through a spokesman Monday he would give the bill careful consideration.

“The Governor believes that vaccinations are profoundly important and a major public health benefit and this bill will be closely considered,” Evan Westrup, Brown's press secretary, said in a statement.

The measure sparked angry opposition from some religious conservatives and from parents who are worried about the side effects of vaccinations.

In recent years, vaccination rates at many California schools have plummeted as parents, some of whom fear a now debunked link between vaccines and autism, have declined to inoculate their children.

The legislation was prompted by a measles outbreak last December traced to the Disneyland theme park in Southern California.

Most children are vaccinated, but at some schools, many in affluent and liberal communities, vaccination rates are well below the 92 percent level needed to maintain group immunity that can protect those who are not vaccinated or have weak immune systems.

The bill was amended in the Assembly last week to give children with existing exemptions more time before they must be vaccinated against such diseases as measles, polio and pertussis. Another amendment allowed doctors to consider family history when deciding whether to grant children medical exemptions from vaccinations.

The Senate vote on Monday was a concurrence vote, in which senators gave the bill final approval by accepting those assembly amendments.

Under the bill, personal beliefs exemptions filed before Jan. 1, 2016, would remain in effect until children complete their “grade spans,” defined as the years from birth to preschool, kindergarten to sixth grade, and seventh through 12th grades.

Children with medical exemptions would not be affected.

In testimony on the bill, opponents said they feared their children would be harmed and that the bill would deny them their right to public education.

California bill to limit vaccine exemptions goes to governor Read More »

$11 million Jewish cultural center to be built in Paris

An $11 million Jewish cultural institution will be built in Paris, the city’s mayor and the oldest existing Jewish organization in France announced.

The European Center for Judaism will be built in the 17th arrondissement, or district, in northern Paris and is set to open in 2017, according to the announcement on Sunday by Mayor Anne Hidalgo and Joel Mergui, the president of the Consistoire Centrale, the body responsible for providing French Jewry with religious services since its foundation in 1808 under Napoleon I.

“I wouldn’t want us to leave for the summer vacation and close this especially tragic year for France and for the Jewish community without being able to provide a note of hope,” Mergui told the Liberation daily. He said the center will operate from “a large building situated in an area of Paris where a large Jewish community has developed.”

Hidalgo is scheduled to attend a fundraising dinner on Monday at the seat of the Paris municipality along with French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve and officials from the European Jewish Congress under Moshe Kantor, who has helped to realize the center’s construction.

The institution, which is intended to serve as an academic center as well as a cultural institution, will have a synagogue, conference halls, exposition space and offices, according to Liberation.

Just over a quarter of the $11 million estimated cost will be paid in subsidies by government offices. The City of Paris leased the land for the center, which will be among the largest opened in Western Europe in recent years, free of charge.

The center’s opening comes at a time of record emigration from France by French Jews, partly because of violent anti-Semitism that has led to the slaying of 12 people since 2012 in attacks attributed to French Islamist terrorists targeting Jewish institutions. About 20,000 French Jews have left for Israel since 2012.

“It would’ve been easy to give up on this project and say that Jews are leaving,” Mergui said. “I want to convey a different message to France and its Jews: We determine our own future.”

$11 million Jewish cultural center to be built in Paris Read More »

U.S. Jews among biggest backers of same-sex marriage, data show

American Jews are among the most supportive religious groups of same-sex marriage.

Some 77 percent of American Jews expressed support for same-sex marriage, according to data gathered in 2014 by the Public Religion Research Institute. Some 47 percent of American Jews polled said they “strongly favor” allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry legally, and 30 percent said they “favor” it.

Thirteen Jewish groups, among them organizations representing the Reform, Reconstructionist and Conservative streams, were among the 25 groups that joined the amicus brief filed by the Anti-Defamation League in Obergefell v. Hodges, the case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday that  legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states.

The only religious group to be more supportive of same-sex marriage are Buddhists at 84 percent, with 48 strongly favoring and 36 in favor. Seventy-seven percent of religiously unaffiliated also support same-sex marriage, with 45 strongly in favor and 32 in favor.

The data were collected as part of the Public Religion Research Institute’s American Values Atlas for 2014, which comprises 40,000 interviews among a random sample of Americans in all 50 states. The institute, a nonprofit group, is “dedicated to research at the intersection of religion, values, and public life,” according to its website.

CORRECTION: This article said originally that 77 percent of religiously affiliated supported same-sex marriage. It should have been religiously unaffiliated.

U.S. Jews among biggest backers of same-sex marriage, data show Read More »

Mother of 7 children who died in Brooklyn house fire leaves hospital

The mother of seven children who died in a March fire in their Brooklyn home was released from the hospital.

Gayle Sassoon left the hospital on Friday and will continue to recover at the Brooklyn home of her mother-in-law, her husband, Gabriel, told the Kol Barama radio station on Sunday during an eight-minute interview.

Sassoon will continue to receive rehabilitation treatment on an outpatient basis, including to improve her walking and the use of her hands, Gabriel Sassoon said, calling his wife “very strong” and saying she possesses “a lot of faith.”

“We are able to cry about them [the children] with love and then be happy instead of crying about them and missing them and being depressed,” Gabriel Sassoon said. “So, I and my wife are trying to make our missing them for something better, to remember the love and the joy that we have. Through this, it’s possible to change the situation from something negative to something positive.”

The couple’s surviving daughter, Tzipporah, 15, came home from the hospital in April.

Gabriel Sassoon was out of town at a religious conference when the fire consumed the family’s home in the New York City borough shortly after midnight on March 22, a Saturday. Officials have blamed an unattended hot plate warming Shabbat meals as the cause.

Gayle Sassoon and Tziporah escaped by leaping from the second floor of the house. The seven children, who ranged in age from 5 to 16, were buried in Jerusalem.

Mother of 7 children who died in Brooklyn house fire leaves hospital Read More »

Netanyahu was ‘smuggled’ to hospital twice in disguised vans

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was “smuggled” to medical appointments in disguised vans shortly before and after elections.

Netanyahu, 65, in both cases had routine prostate examinations that found “nothing uncharacteristic for a man of his age.”

In the first instance, shortly before the March 17 elections, he was transported to Mayanei Hayeshua Medical Center, a haredi Orthodox hospital in the Tel Aviv suburb of Bnei Brak, in what appeared to be a pita delivery van, Israel’s Channel 2 reported.

Shortly after the vote, Netanyahu was taken in a disguised pest-control van, with his security guards dressed as pest controllers around the vehicle.

Channel 2 did not explain why Netanyahu employed the disguised vehicles.

Netanyahu was ‘smuggled’ to hospital twice in disguised vans Read More »

Gay Marriage Ruling: Regrettable but Understandable

“We reiterate the historical position of the Jewish faith, enunciated unequivocally in our Bible, Talmud, and Codes, which forbids homosexual relationships and condemns the institutionalization of such relationships as marriages. Our religion is emphatic in defining marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman. Our beliefs in this regard are unalterable.” — Official statement by the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations

“I think Judaism … what they have to say about it, is that this is an affirmation — this is an affirmation of the human heart and of our inclination to love.” — Reform Rabbi Lisa Edwards

“The Court's decision does not alter the Lord's doctrine that marriage is a union between a man and a woman ordained by God. While showing respect for those who think differently, the Church will continue to teach and promote marriage between a man and a woman as a central part of our doctrine and practice.” — Official statement by the Mormon Church

—–

Well, the Five Lawyers have finally spoken. I wish they had handed down a different decision, but it's hard to see how they could have decided otherwise in an increasingly secular country.

I remain opposed to state-sanctioned gay marriage for religious reasons. It's difficult to support same-sex marriage while believing, as Mormons do, that God is married, that gender is part of one's eternal identity, and that God's plan for humankind has as its central feature the concept of eternal families created through marriages between men and women that are solemnized in modern temples. If someone believes all of these things and also accepts the biblical injunctions against homosexual behavior, then it's also likely that he/she doesn't think that it's a great idea for government to be sanctioning same-sex marriage.

That said, it must be noted that 98% of Americans are not Mormons. A slim majority of Americans now supports gay marriage, and before the historic ruling last week, most states sanctioned same-sex marriage (though in most cases the state's voters were not given the chance to voice their opinion at the ballot box). If I'm honest with myself, I'm pretty sure that if I weren't a Mormon (or conservative Catholic, Orthodox Jew, Muslim, or Evangelical), I would regard marriage as a right, and I'd be hard-pressed to come up with a secular argument for denying gays the opportunity to marry.

Gays have been marrying in Massachusetts for 11 years so far, and my life has not been impacted one bit. Not one gay marriage has adversely affected my marriage, and even the Dennis Pragers of the world have to admit that if two men adopt a child (as they can legally do in many states), it is unarguably better for the child for his dads to marry and legally commit to each other (and by extension to the child) than for them to remain two single guys who live together. Again, for me these practical considerations are overriden by my religious beliefs, but it's very easy to understand why people who have different religious beliefs are inclined to look at gay marriage and ask “Whom does it harm?”

What is harder to understand is why 77% of American Jews (according to a recent survey) support gay marriage, something that explicitly goes against their scriptures and tradition (please see the OU statement above). As long as I live, it will be hard for me to accept that intelligent, committed Jews can support abortion and gay marriage. Even the rabbinic heads of the Reform movement opposed gay marriage until the 1990s, when they ditched the Torah's teachings and focused their attention on promoting equality and justice instead. Rabbi Edwards' emotion-based statement shown above, which fails to reference the Torah, is a perfect example of this kind of thinking.

Indeed, the silliest statements that I have ever heard from religious leaders were made by Reform rabbis who abandoned logic in their zeal to justify gay marriage from a rabbinic perspective. There was the straight rabbi whose wife was also a rabbi, and they had adorable young kids. At lunch one day during the Prop 8 campaign, he made the jaw-dropping statement that he did not believe that his wife, as a woman, gave anything to his children that a man could not also give them. I was not surprised to hear that he and his wife soon divorced. However, he had nothing on the gay married rabbi who slammed his newly-acquired marriage certificate on the table in front of a few Mormon leaders and angrily informed them that his parents had suffered at Bergen-Belsen so that he could marry a man. I told him afterwards that I could no longer refer to him as “rabbi,” and was once again not surprised to hear that his contract was not renewed by his synagogue. When Jewish leaders abandon Torah teaching on this subject, my experience has been that silliness becomes its substitute.

One can only hope that the right of churches and Orthodox synagogues to refuse to marry two men or two women will continue to be respected, but I have little faith in the decency of the Boy Scout-busting gay-rights fanatics. However, I do respect the Court's decision, and can only hope that it will be as solicitous in the future of the rights of religious organizations who oppose gay marriage as it has been of the feelings of gays wishing to marry.      

Gay Marriage Ruling: Regrettable but Understandable Read More »

Comedian Jack Carter, friend of Sid Caesar, dies at 93

Comedian Jack Carter died June 28 of respiratory failure at his home in Beverly Hills. He was 93. He was also an actor, emcee, singer, mimic, dancer, and director in a career that spanned over seven decades.

He began his professional career appearing on Broadway in “Call Me Mister.” He later appeared on Milton Berle’s “Texaco Star Theatre” shows, and it was during this time that Carter got his first real break.

Read more at Variety.

Comedian Jack Carter, friend of Sid Caesar, dies at 93 Read More »

Untethered

There’s an elongated moment in time when that camp bus pulls out of the parking lot whisking away our son with developmental disabilities and his wonderful aide for almost a month of sleep-away camp at Camp Ramah, California. I feel giddy and excited, thinking about the time ahead without the usual daily obligations and complex logistics, and take comfort in knowing that he’s going to have a wonderful time with fellow campers, counselors and staff, enjoying his favorite camp activities of singing, dancing and swimming. I eagerly look forward to catching a play, staying out late without rushing home to relieve the babysitter, and doing much less laundry.

But, while I’m enjoying my time off with other family members and friends, there’s a little constant buzz in the back of my brain, feeling like I have lost an essential item. I keep thinking that I’ve left my keys behind when they are in their usual spot at the bottom of my purse. My dreams have me driving around aimlessly, unable to ever exit the complicated freeway system (okay, maybe a bit of déjà vu here in LA).

Without the usual rhythms of our son’s daily schedule, speech therapy sessions, medications, bedtime rituals, etc I feel somehow out of sync myself. Over the years, I have found it easier to make this adjustment when we are away on vacation, out of town in a totally new milieu. But as schedules turned out this year, we are all going to Israel together in July for the wedding of a very close friend, so I’m mostly at home, working as a nonprofit consultant during the day and running around at night.

The “Calm” meditation app I try to use on a daily basis tells me to “let your feelings float away, like clouds in the sky” so I’m doing my best to acknowledge that nagging sensation of forgetting something important, and then letting it go by by taking deep, three-part breaths. And then I remember that camp ends on July 13th, so I better not get too used to this.

Untethered Read More »

Israeli experts say new generation of hackers pose growing threat

This article first appeared on The Media Line.

The attacks perpetrated by today’s generation of hackers have evolved in both sophistication and capability, say cyber security experts. Governments and large corporations must now protect themselves from what have become known as APTs – Advanced Persistent Threats.

If attacks of the past were designed to be a nuisance which would clog up servers or collapse websites under bombardments of junk mail, then APTs can be understood as a long term effort to infiltrate a system without alerting the victim to the intrusion.

Technological advances have had a large role in bringing about the new threat but just as important is the sophisticated organizational techniques that hackers are now using, Hudi Zack, a representative of US Information Technology Verint Systems cyber department, told The Media Line. Technology which was previously only affordable to governments is now in the hands of criminals and this has increased the danger, he said.

But it is the way in which hackers are organizing their attacks which is the game changer. “The attackers are very patient, they know exactly where they want to go, they go in low profile, under the radar, (and) get to where they want” Zack said, explaining that hackers may take months to complete what are known as “low and slow” attacks against a server. Infiltrations are conducted like a military operation, Zack explained, with clear phases.

First an attacker will conduct a reconnaissance of a target creating “an intelligence picture of the entity they want to attack,” from which vulnerabilities and entry points into a network can be identified, Zack said. Next attackers will infiltrate the target. This can be done using fishing emails or by infecting an employee’s computer while they are outside of the protection of their work place, Zack said.

One favored method of intelligence services is to infiltrate state official’s networks via hotel Wi-Fi during diplomatic meetings, as an attacker can predict a target being in a specific location in advance. “It is easier to hack into an Iranian official’s computer whilst he’s in a European hotel than when he is in his office in Tehran, for example,” Zack said.

Once a virus is inside a network it then generally communicates back to its operators and begins to spread towards the specific location on the network that is desirable – “Usually the first point of infiltration is not where it wants to go – it wants to go to the financial system, to the data center, to the CEO’s computer.”

Cyber security experts have identified three or four groups which hackers generally tend to belong to. The first and least threatening is young computer enthusiasts who become involved in hacking for fun or out of a sense of curiosity; secondly there are politically motivated hacktivists including groups like Anonymous. Although these two groups are possibly the best known caricatures of hackers they are actually the ones governments and corporations are least worried about.

That privilege falls to organized criminal gangs– groups who try to steal, damage or ransom data for financial gain, and to state-run cyber espionage units. It is the criminal and security agency hackers that have the resources and the sophistication to conduct the APT attacks that states and corporations are concerned with.

Governments are aware of the threat and are reacting to it, a marketing manager for Israeli Aerospace Industries (IAI) who wished not to be named, told The Media Line. IAI, both Israel’s largest defense contractor and a subsidiary of the government, has branched out into the cyber security realm – a move increasingly common among leading arms manufacturers.

The IAI manager pointed to comments by Lieutenant General Gadi Eizenkot, Israel’s most senior officer, that a fourth branch of the military, cyber warfare, will be formed in the coming years.  This new organization will stand alongside the land, sea and air branches which have traditionally been the basis for militaries in the twentieth century, and will form a unified defense against cyber threats to Israel.

The fact that both Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon spoke at this year’s International Cyber Conference at Tel Aviv University, indicated how seriously Israel – a country renowned for its high-tech capabilities – is taking cyber security.

Consolidation of resources into dedicated cyber units is increasingly the strategy governments are moving towards, Daniel Cohen, research fellow with The Institute for National Security Studies told The Media Line. A second approach is the recognition that cyber security is not simply a concern for the military and for critical infrastructure but for profit orientated companies too.

Both these ideas can be seen in the announcement by the Israeli government earlier in 2015 of the intention to create a cyber-bureau to protect civilian private interests, Cohen said. Such an organization would be designed to prevent aggressor states damaging the Israeli economy by disrupting private enterprises, Cohen explained.

A third manner in which governments are working to protect themselves is through the creation of human capital which once sufficiently trained would provide a stockpile of experts able to defend against cyber threats, Cohen said. Cyber defenders have an arsenal of tools with which to defend against hackers. Computer forensics can be used to try to identify a perpetrator and to reverse engineer an attack in order to formulate a defense for the future. Cyber intelligence units are also increasingly monitoring social media and hacker forums to identify trends in methods of infiltration and to predict when and where attacks will be made.

If today’s cyber threats have governments scrambling to restructure their security apparatus then tomorrow’s dangers are likely to be no less worrying. When asked to predict what will come next Cohen suggests that computer espionage will become increasingly powerful and prevalent. Even more alarming perhaps is Cohen’s assessment that in the near future terrorist groups, especially those being used as armed proxies by states, will gain the capability to use APTs and will make use of them to target governments and their citizens.

Israel, both the perpetrator and the victim of a number of infamous hacking attacks (if internet rumors can be believed), is placed at the forefront of the growing cyber warfare arena. With both one of the Middle East’s largest high-tech industries and most advanced militaries the Jewish state will wish to maintain its edge in this emerging field.

Israeli experts say new generation of hackers pose growing threat Read More »

Why Israel should keep going after Breaking the Silence

The organization Breaking the Silence is in the headlines again, is getting on Israelis’ nerves again, and is making life difficult for Israel again. Breaking the Silence collects testimonies of Israeli soldiers who served in the West Bank or in Gaza during outbreaks of violence and publishes them in lengthy reports – all of them portraying Israel as a country whose morality in occupation and war is questionable. It is important to talk about this organization and its actions, it is important to understand the context in which it operates, and it is important to be able to do this calmly and understand the nature of the problem. Yes, Breaking the Silence is a problem for Israel, as are several other sister organizations that are battling for European and American funds and attention. Many of these organizations contributed to the UN Report on the Gaza war that was released last week.

Battling Breaking the Silence is not easy for Israelis who cherish their freedom to speak and express their opinions, as twisted as they might be. Such a battle raises some questions about tolerance. For example – should the IDF feature in its party for new draftees a popular singer that is also a supporter of Breaking the Silence? That is not a theoretical question. Singer Shaanan Street is a supporter of the organization, and he is slated to sing at a party for draftees. Activists are protesting his invitation, saying that for the IDF (it is actually an NGO supportive of the IDF that is organizing the party) to invite a singer who spreads messages that smear its soldiers is dumb. But I assume that the soon-to-be-soldiers at this party likely want to listen to him, as his music is popular with this age group. So, should he be invited or shunned?

Breaking the Silence is a political organization supported, abetted, financed, hyped, and guarded by Israelis and (mostly) non-Israelis that have a problem with Israel’s policies, governments, and, in many cases, core ethos. All its reports should be seen in such context. However, there should be no mistake: it is possible, even likely, that some of the devastating accounts published by Breaking the Silence are accurate or close to accurate. Israel – in peace and in war – is far from being a perfect country. The IDF, with all of its efforts to keep its actions moral, is not a perfect institution. There are soldiers that ignore instructions. There are commanders that lose their temper during battle. There are situations and incidents that should be investigated and behaviors that merit punishment. Breaking the Silence and its political agenda or its faulty deeds should not be used as an excuse for Israel not to better itself and its military.

But Breaking the Silence has several features that make it annoying to most Israelis.

It publishes anonymous testimonies that cannot be verified, investigated and, if necessary, prosecuted.

It does not work with the IDF, it does not work with Israel’s legal system, it makes it impossible for Israel to respond or act on any of the information the organization claims to have gathered. Breaking the Silence brings Israel before a court without giving it any chance to defend itself.

The organization also works more abroad than within Israel. Namely, its main strategy is not to make Israel better by convincing Israelis that morality at war is important, but rather to smear it and ruin its reputation among the nations.

And it works in a field that is very sensitive – abetting a campaign to portray Israel as an outlaw state and hence delegitimize it and delegitimize any act it takes to defend itself from its enemies.

The Israeli government busies itself with attempts to disrupt Breaking the Silence's activities abroad. It often succeeds, but it failed miserably when the organization secured a White House presentation of its merchandise a few weeks ago. Almost a year after the breakout of the 2014 Gaza operation, and just days prior to yet another damning report from the UN against Israel, such meetings give Israel a taste of what it’s like to have tense relations with a US administration.

The leaders of the organization and its defenders have responded on different occasions to allegations against them, claiming that their opponents come from a certain political camp. That is not exactly true. A vast majority of Israelis disprove of Breaking the Silence’s actions.

These Israelis feel that way not because they don’t care about the IDF being moral in battle. Most of them do want the IDF to be moral in battle. Most of them want Israel to retain its moral high ground. Of course, this does not mean that Israelis all agree on what constitutes “morality” in battle. They debate these issues, as they should. They struggle with them, as they should. And they are frustrated by them – because of organizations such as Breaking the Silence.

It is worthwhile to ask the question of whether organizations such as Breaking the Silence force Israel to be more thorough in making sure that the IDF behaves properly. On the one hand, Israel has to respond to outside pressure and investigations, and it has to make sure it has proper answers and can defend itself against moral accusations. On the other hand, Breaking the Silence and its supporters make the cause of morality in battle suspicious to Israelis. If morality is a code word for smearing Israel in the eyes of the world – Israelis will not want to associate themselves with such a cause.

The leaders of Breaking the Silence claim – recently on TV – that the discussion abroad “is already taking place” with or without the participation of Israeli organizations. That is true, but lacking in context. Israeli organizations that join the chorus of Israel bashing provide a cover of legitimacy to all those who bash Israel. They provide this cover to those who bash Israel because they love Israel and want to make it better, to those who bash Israel because it’s fashionable, to those who bash Israel because they are ignorant, and to those who bash Israel because they hate Israel, or Jews, or both. That is to say: the people of Breaking the Silence aren’t just joining a discussion that is “already taking place”. They contribute to it in a unique way.

Surely, blaming an Israeli organization of such deeds – abetting Israel’s enemies – is highly problematic. It can be a slippery slope. Suggesting that Israel should fight against Breaking the Silence is also problematic. Israel is proud of its many freedoms – among them the freedom to criticize and bash the country. But letting people speak – a sacred freedom – does not mean Israel has to let Breaking the Silence speak without responding. This organization creates a problem for Israel, and the government – carefully, using legitimate legal means – should treat it the way governments treat problems.

By refusing to work within the Israeli system, Breaking the Silence sends a message that it has given up on us, so there is no reason for Israel not to give up on them.

Why Israel should keep going after Breaking the Silence Read More »