fbpx

March 26, 2015

Who’s On First? Not the U.S. in Yemen

The Obama Administration’s Mideast policy recalls the old Abbott and Costello routine: “Who’s on First.” For example, this Administration doesn’t know and doesn’t care who's on first in Yemen: ignoring the evidence that its friends, Iran’s mullahs, are making the Gulf of Aden into another “Persian Gulf.”

We’re in the early stages of a new Mideast War, but not involving Israel. It’s then latest round of the age-old Sunni-Shia conflict, pitting Saudi Arabia against Iranian Houthi surrogates. In some ways, this way reminds me of the 1930’s Spanish Civil War, prelude to World War II. In other ways, the unceremonious exit of the U.S. Marines is reminiscent of the heliocpters snatchinbg the last desperate Americans and Vietnames from the roof of our Saigon Embassy.

Extraordinarily, President Obama last September declared Yemen a successful “model” counterterrorism strategy. And now—believe it or not—the White House of Non-Stop Denials has repeated the claim.

The Jewish presence in Yemen—now all but extinguished—dates back to before Muhammed. South Yemen once had a “Jewish king.” The country’s strategic importance was recognized in biblical tales of King Solomon’s amatory, diplomatic, and trade relations. Ephraim Isaac,  coauthor of my new book, From Abraham to Obama, who has headed the Yemenite Jewish Federation in America, can tell you all about this.

If there’s a method behind the seeming madness of the Obama Administration’s seemingly inexplicable Mideast policy, it seems to be to help install Tehran as the regional hegemon: repealing 1300 years of Sunni-Shia strife in which the Sunni Arabs have usually had the better of it. Why this new U.S. policy? Because Valerie Jarret was born in Iran? Who the hell knows!

Jews have long had nightmares about an American President selling out Israel to the Arabs. But an American President selling out both Israel and the Arabs to the Persians: who would have thunk it?

The Obama Administration may think they are ushering in a new age of Mideast harmony with the U.S. and Iran as joint regents. Much more likely is another, nuclear age of Sunni-Shia strife, which may be remembered as Obama’s Folly.

Who’s On First? Not the U.S. in Yemen Read More »

Hezbollah sees Yemen strikes causing more Mideast tension

Hezbollah condemned as “unjust aggression” Saudi-led air strikes in Yemen on Thursday and said it takes the region towards increased tension.

The Shi'ite group, which is backed by Iran, also called on Saudi Arabia and its allies to immediately and unconditionally halt the strikes.

“This adventure, (which) lacks wisdom and legal and legitimate justification and which is led by Saudi Arabia, is taking the region towards increased tension and dangers for the future and the present of the region,” its statement said.

“We see that this aggression secures American interests and offers a great favor for the Zionist enemy,” it said, a reference to Israel.

Hezbollah sees Yemen strikes causing more Mideast tension Read More »

Co-pilot appears to have crashed Germanwings plane on purpose, prosecutor says

A young German co-pilot locked himself alone in the cockpit of a Germanwings airliner and flew it into a mountain with what appears to have been the intent to destroy it, a French prosecutor said on Thursday.

Investigators and grieving relatives were left struggling to explain what motivated Andreas Lubitz, 28, to kill all 150 people on board the Airbus A320, including himself, in Wednesday's crash in the French Alps.

French and German officials said there was no indication the crash was a terrorist attack, but gave no alternative explanation for his motives.

Lubitz gained sole control of the aircraft after the captain left the cockpit. He refused to re-open the door and sent plane into its fatal descent, Marseille prosecutor Brice Robin said.

He did this “for a reason we cannot fathom right now but which looks like intent to destroy this aircraft,” Robin told a news conference in Marseille broadcast live on national TV.

Describing the final 10 minutes of the passengers on board as the plane hurtled towards a mountain range, Robin said sound recordings from one of its black boxes suggested most of them would not have been aware of their fate until the very end.

“Only towards the end do you hear screams,” he said. “And bear in mind that death would have been instantaneous … the aircraft was literally smashed to bits.”

The CEO of Lufthansa, parent company of Germanwings, said its air crew were picked carefully and subjected to psychological vetting.

“No matter your safety regulations, no matter how high you set the bar, and we have incredibly high standards, there is no way to rule out such an event,” CEO Carsten Spohr said.

The world's attention will now focus on the motivations of Lubitz, a German national who joined the budget carrier in September 2013 and had just 630 hours of flying time – compared with the 6,000 hours of the flight captain, named in German media only as “Patrick S.” in accordance with usual practice.

Robin said there were no grounds to suspect that Lubitz was carrying out a terrorist attack. “Suicide” was also the wrong word to describe actions which killed so many other people, the prosecutor added: “I don't necessarily call it suicide when you have responsibility for 100 or so lives.”

Police set up guard outside Lubitz's house in Montabaur, Germany. Acquaintances in the town said they were stunned, describing him as an affable young man who gave no indication he was harbouring any harmful intent.

“I'm just speechless. I don't have any explanation for this. Knowing Andreas, this is just inconceivable for me,” said Peter Ruecker, a long-time member of the local flight club where Lubitz received his flying license years ago.

“He was a lot of fun, even though he was perhaps sometimes a bit quiet. He was just another boy like so many others here.”

A photo on Lubitz's Facebook page, which was later taken down, shows a smiling young man posing in front of San Francisco's Golden Gate bridge.

Robin said the conversation between the two pilots before the captain left the cockpit started normally but that Lubitz's replies became “laconic” as they started readying what would have been the normal descent to the airport of Duesseldorf.

“His responses become very brief. There is no proper exchange as such,” he said. It was not clear why the captain had left the cockpit but it was probably to use the toilet, he said.

Robin said the family of the co-pilot had arrived in France for a tribute alongside other those of the victims but was being kept apart from the others.

“SMASH THE DOOR DOWN”

The New York Times cited an unnamed investigator as saying the recording shed insight into the moment when it dawned on the captain that he had been shut out of the cockpit.

“The guy outside is knocking lightly on the door and there is no answer,” it quoted an investigator described as a senior French military official as saying. “And then he hits the door stronger and no answer. There is never an answer.”

“You can hear he is trying to smash the door down,” the investigator added.

Investigators were still searching for the second of the two black boxes on Thursday in the ravine where the plane crashed, 100 km (65 miles) from Nice, which would contain data from the plane's instruments.

France's BEA air investigation bureau had said on Wednesday it expected the first basic analysis of the voice recordings in days.

Pilots may temporarily leave the cockpit at certain times and in certain circumstances, such as while the aircraft is cruising, according to German aviation law.

Cockpit doors can be opened from the outside with a code, in line with regulations introduced after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, but the code can be overridden from inside the cockpit. Lufthansa's CEO said that either the pilot had entered the code incorrectly, or the co-pilot inside had overridden it.

The BEA on Wednesday already ruled out a mid-air explosion and said the scenario did not look like a depressurisation.

Germanwings said 72 Germans were killed in the first major air passenger disaster on French soil since the 2000 Concorde accident just outside Paris. Madrid revised down on Thursday the number of Spanish victims to 50 from 51 previously.

As well as Germans and Spaniards, victims included three Americans, a Moroccan and citizens of Britain, Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Colombia, Denmark, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Iran and the Netherlands, officials said. However, DNA checks to identify them could take weeks, the French government said.

The families of victims were being flown to Marseille on Thursday before being taken up to the zone close to the crash site. Chapels had been prepared for them with a view of the mountain where their loved ones died.

Co-pilot appears to have crashed Germanwings plane on purpose, prosecutor says Read More »

Cutting losses on Iran nuclear deal, Israel eyes small print

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has begun to signal that Israel could resign itself to an Iranian nuclear deal that would leave its enemy with some uranium enrichment capability, a compromise he has long opposed.

The shift seems surprising given Netanyahu's contentious speech to the U.S. Congress earlier this month in which he argued against world powers letting Tehran keep thousands of uranium centrifuges and remain on possible course to a bomb.

But faced with Western impatience and White House wrath over the calls to avoid a “very bad deal” – while offering no detailed alternative of his own – Netanyahu and his envoys are now engaging with negotiators on the small print of what Israel hopes will be a better agreement.

Almost lost in the prime minister's March 3 denunciations in Congress was a line urging U.S. President Barack Obama to seek a “better deal” that “Israel and its neighbors may not like, but with which we could live, literally”.

Pressed to elaborate, Netanyahu, who won a fourth term in Israel's March 17 election, told MSNBC in an interview two days later that Israel and like-minded Arab states might accede to Iran not giving up of all its uranium centrifuges.

Iran insists its nuclear drive is peaceful and wants to keep at least 9,000 of the centrifuges, which are used to process uranium to energy-yielding purity but could potentially make warhead fuel too.

World powers have spoken of allowing Iran to have 6,500 centrifuges, a number they assess would slow the “break out” period Iran would need to build a bomb to a year – time enough to intervene.

The Israelis, who are not a party to the talks but have been heard out in Western capitals due to their fears of a nuclear-armed Iran and their threats – now looking increasingly hollow – to launch a unilateral war of last-resort, have made clear they want their foe left with much less.

But they have not presented a comprehensive counter-proposal, a reticence that one Israeli nuclear official told Reuters was designed to avoid providing a “bottom line” that negotiators might try to stretch in their talks with Iran.

Instead, officials say, Israel has been challenging Western powers on specific details of a deal, such as strong technical safeguards and extending the breakout time.

“We think to leave Iran one year from the bomb or 1.5 years is too dangerous because sooner or later they will dash to the bomb,” Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz, Netanyahu's point-man on Iran, told Reuters this week during a visit to Europe, where he conferred with French and British counterparts.

DETAILS IN FOCUS

Israel, Steinitz said, preferred a 2- to 3-year breakout time – a disclosure in itself reflecting the recalibration by Netanyahu, whose advisers previously said that Iran, if stripped of all nuclear projects, could reconstitute them in five years.

Steinitz argued the one-year breakout could apply even if Iran were left with just 3,000 to 4,000 centrifuges, given its capacity, known by the rubric “research and development”, to improve their performance and manufacture more at short notice.

“We claim that if Iran is permitted to preserve 6,000 centrifuges the breakout time is not 12 months but around nine to 10 months, even with zero (uranium) stockpiles,” Steinitz said, urging world powers to insist on technological curbs.

“Although we are against a deal in general, we are also focusing on specific items within this wrong deal,” he said, adding that Iran should also be compelled to come clean on allegations it had conducted secret nuclear weaponization tests.

“R&D is the most important topic on the table.”

A European diplomat confirmed this was now the Israelis' focus, saying that although they “are clearly not fans of the one-year (breakout) they are principally concerned by research and development and want the most restrictions possible on it. The message is simple: stop all enrichment possibilities.”

“They are very conservative on each parameter and pushing for the most conservative and restrictive measures, but they appear to be more flexible than what they originally wanted.”

A U.S. diplomat, who also spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity, said it was still unclear how many Iranian centrifuges might get Israel's grudging assent.

“In private they have been talking about small numbers but the devil is in the details. What's small to us is not small to them,” the U.S. diplomat said.

Israeli hopes of seeing Iran denied any refined uranium capacity were dashed by its November 2013 interim deal with world powers, which envisaged a final agreement permitting it a “mutually defined” and “peaceful” enrichment program.

Negotiators want to agree the deal by June 30, and an outline by next week, despite disputes among Western delegates. Iran on Wednesday said any agreement must involve the immediate lifting of sanctions on it, a demand rejected by the West.

At loggerheads with a Washington weary of Middle East wars, Netanyahu has not played up past threats to attack Iran. Asked how Israel might respond if a nuclear deal that it opposes goes through, Steinitz said: “I don't know.”

Another senior Israeli official was circumspect, saying: “Would Bibi (Netanhayu) go to war over 5,000 centrifuges? I'm not so sure.”

Cutting losses on Iran nuclear deal, Israel eyes small print Read More »

U.S., Iran resume talks on preliminary nuclear deal as deadline looms

The United States and Iran resumed negotiations on Thursday aimed at clinching a nuclear deal before a March 31 deadline, and officials close to the talks said some kind of preliminary agreement between Tehran and six powers was possible.

As the talks began, Washington and Tehran took opposing stands on Saudi-led air strikes in Yemen against rebels allied to Iran who are fighting to oust the country's president, but it was unclear whether this would affect the nuclear talks.

The two sides are seeking a political framework accord by the end of this month that would lay the foundations for a full deal by June 30.

Under a final settlement, Tehran would halt sensitive nuclear work for at least a decade and in exchange, international sanctions on Iran would be lifted. This would aim to end the country's 12-year nuclear standoff with the West and reduce the risk of another war in the Middle East.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz met their Iranian counterparts, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and Atomic Energy Organization chief Ali Akbar Salehi, in the Swiss city of Lausanne.

Earlier, Iranian media quoted Zarif as condemning the Saudi-led military operation against the Shi'ite Muslim Houthi fighters in Yemen, and demanding that it stop.

By contrast, Kerry spoke to the foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Cooperation Council members on Thursday and welcomed their decision to take action against the Houthis, a senior U.S. official said.

However, neither Kerry nor Zarif responded when asked by a reporter in Lausanne to comment on the air strikes.

Speaking to reporters traveling with Kerry from Washington on Wednesday, a senior State Department official said the six powers – the United States, Britain, France, Germany,Russia and China – would not rush to complete a framework agreement with Iran just because there was a March 31 deadline.

But the official said the parties had made progress at last week's inconclusive round of negotiations in Lausanne.

“We very much believe we can get this done by the 31st,” the official said. “We see a path to do that.” The official added, however, that there was no guarantee of success.

Salehi also said a deal was possible but not certain. “It is difficult to forecast whether we can reach a result at this round of talks but we are moving toward reaching a mutual understanding in all technical issues,” he told Iranian state television.

Israel, Saudi Arabia, France and U.S. Congress have all raised concerns that the administration of President Barack Obama might be willing to conclude a deal that would allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapons capability in the future.

The State Department official said: “Any political understanding needs to address in some way all of the elements of a final agreement.”

“We do not know what form this will take … We have always said it needs to have specifics. We will need to communicate as many specifics as possible in some form or fashion (to the public and U.S. Congress).”

Those elements include the different ways to a nuclear weapon, ensuring that it would take Iran at least one year to produce enough high enriched uranium for a single bomb, research and development into advanced centrifuges, transparency measures and monitoring, and sanctions relief for Iran.

FABIUS TO JOIN TALKS

Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, opposes the idea of a two-step process. Iranian officials say they fear a written framework accord would curtail Tehran's negotiating space for the final deal.

Iranian officials have also suggested they could accept some kind of statement or political declaration in Lausanne, as opposed to a formal written agreement.

Officials close to the talks said deep disagreements remained between Tehran and the powers, while divisions had also emerged in recent weeks between the United States andFrance on what to demand of Tehran. U.S. officials say the six are united.

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, who last week phoned his negotiation team to tell them to keep a tough line in the talks, will join the talks on Saturday. Other ministers may also arrive at then, officials said.

Iran denies Western allegations it is seeking the capability to procure atomic weapons. But Israel, which is believed to have the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal, has previously threatened Iran with military attack.

With the Republican-led U.S. Congress threatening to vote on new sanctions against Iran if there is no agreement this month, the Obama administration is pushing hard to secure a deal. Obama has vowed to veto any new sanctions moves.

Other officials said some kind of memorandum of understanding that would satisfy U.S. needs for Congress and Khamenei's demands was possible by Sunday.

The main obstacle, Western officials say, remains Iran's refusal to compromise on sanctions, research and development and other issues. Salehi disagreed, saying it was the Western powers who need to compromise.

“Iran has demonstrated its political will and it is up to the other side to take a step forward and show that it has the political will to allow a resolution of the problem,” he was quoted as saying on Iran's Press TV website.

U.S., Iran resume talks on preliminary nuclear deal as deadline looms Read More »

Amnesty Int’l: Gaza rocket attacks by Palestinians are war crimes

Several rocket attacks launched at Israel from inside the Gaza Strip amount to war crimes, Amnesty International said.

In a report released Wednesday, the human rights group also found that Palestinian rocket fire during the Hamas-Israel conflict last summer killed more civilians inside the Gaza Strip than inside Israel due to the use of unguided projectiles that cannot be accurately aimed at specific targets. In many cases, the rockets landed inside Gaza rather than the intended targets in Israel.

Using unguided weapons is prohibited under international law and their use constitutes a war crime.

“Palestinian armed groups, including the armed wing of Hamas, repeatedly launched unlawful attacks during the conflict killing and injuring civilians,” said Philip Luther, director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Amnesty International, in a statement. “In launching these attacks, they displayed a flagrant disregard for international humanitarian law and for the consequences of their violations on civilians in both Israel and the Gaza Strip.”

Six Israeli civilians were killed in the conflict last summer.

“Palestinian armed groups must end all direct attacks on civilians and indiscriminate attacks,” Luther said. “They must also take all feasible precautions to protect civilians in the Gaza Strip from the effects of such attacks. This includes taking all possible measures to avoid locating fighters and arms within or near densely populated areas.”

At least 1,585 Palestinian civilians, including more than 530 children, were killed in Gaza, according to Amnesty, and at least 16,245 homes were destroyed or rendered uninhabitable by Israeli attacks during the conflict. Amnesty says some of these attacks also amounted to war crimes.

“The devastating impact of Israeli attacks on Palestinian civilians during the conflict is undeniable, but violations by one side in a conflict can never justify violations by their opponents,” Luther said.

He called on both sides to cooperate with investigations by the United Nations Commission of Inquiry and the International Criminal Court to end what he called “a cycle of violations in which civilians on both sides have paid a heavy price.”

Two previous Amnesty reports on Israel’s Operation Protective Edge were critical of Israel’s military.

Amnesty Int’l: Gaza rocket attacks by Palestinians are war crimes Read More »

Uptown Passover

Chag Sameach! Just in time for Passover, here's a new song to get stuck in your head at the Seder table.

A cappella group Six13 is known for its Jewish parody covers of modern songs. Think of them as Weird Al Yankovic's cousins who went on Birthright, and decided to never leave Israel. The group has become somewhat of a staple in Jewish pop culture, with its YouTube channel garnering almost 4 million views to date.

Uptown Passover Read More »

This week in power: Election fallout and Synagogue attack

A roundup of the most talked about political and global stories in the Jewish world this week:

Netanyahu walks back
After a contentious Israeli election, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ” target=”_blank”>said William Saletan at Slate.

In the days since, many are questioning what's in store for the future of U.S.-Israel relations. “The diplomatic relationship will face a day of reckoning. Liberals have a deep (and, in my opinion, correct) attachment to Israel’s founding ideals as a democratic haven for the Jewish people. They will have to adjust to a reality that is leaving them behind,” ” target=”_blank”>said David Bernstein in The Washington Post.

Synagogue fight
Six people were arrested after a ” target=”_blank”>wrote Rick Moran at American Thinker. “It remains to be seen what action will be taken by the police and synagogue officials to ensure that attacks like this don’t happen in the future, as Europe finds itself, once again, in the grip of anti-Semitism,” This week in power: Election fallout and Synagogue attack Read More »

Start mending U.S. rift by firing ambassador, Zionist Union lawmaker urges Netanyahu

An Israeli lawmaker called on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to fire the country’s ambassador to the United States, Ron Dermer.

Firing Dermer would be a first step to repairing the U.S.-Israel relationship, Erel Margalit of the Zionist Union party said in a letter sent to Netanyahu on Wednesday.

Dermer played a key role in organizing and preparing Netanyahu’s controversial speech to a joint meeting of Congress earlier this month. Neither the White House nor congressional Democrats were informed of the address warning against a nuclear agreement with Iran, bucking President Barack Obama’s policy of diplomacy.

“The loss of trust between the U.S. leadership and Israel’s leadership is dangerous for the country,” Margalit said in his letter, urging Netanyahu to “rehabilitate” the relationship.

Margalit said that Dermer “has served in the United States willingly and with loyalty,” and that Netanyahu has given Dermer his “full faith and trust,” as is to be expected.

“It is clear that Ambassador Dermer had a hand in recent events and it seriously hurt his ability to act in his official capacity in the United States. Even now, the doors to the White House and the State Department are closed to him, the U.S. Administration does not have faith in him and does not see him as a partner,” Margalit wrote.

“When an Israeli ambassador is a persona non grata, it endangers Israel,” he wrote, requesting that Netanyahu recall Dermer and replace him with “a diplomat that will be accepted by those with whom he must work.”

“It will prove that Israel is not determined to destroy our relationship with the US and instead is looking to rebuild trust with our greatest and most important ally in the world.”

Margalit was elected to the Knesset in 2013 from the Labor Party, which teamed with Hatnuah in last week’s elections to form Zionist Union.

Start mending U.S. rift by firing ambassador, Zionist Union lawmaker urges Netanyahu Read More »

Tragic loss in Brooklyn sounds alarm across the Jewish world

During a time when we are preparing our homes and communities to celebrate the joyous festivities of Passover, a painful tragedy has muted our joy. 

Last Friday night, a malfunctioning electric hot plate set off a fire that killed seven children in Brooklyn. The world lost seven beautiful souls, children of Gabriel and Gayle Sassoon: sons David, 12; Yehoshua, 10; Moshe, 8; and Yaakov, 5; and daughters Eliane, 16; Rivka, 11; and Sarah, 6. The mother Gayle and 15-year-old Siporah managed to escape by leaping out of the second-floor windows and are in critical condition, in need of our prayers.

God didn’t sacrifice these children to convince us that keeping Shabbat is dangerous or an anathema to modern life. God didn’t take these precious lives from the world because of our sins. God took these seven souls back, away from this terrestrial existence, for reasons beyond our comprehension. It leaves a gaping hole in the lives of their family members, and such a shocking loss reverberates throughout the Jewish world.

However, as a parent, and as an observant Jew who uses an electric hot plate and a holiday candle, the tragedy is a loud alarm to me, and hopefully to everyone, about the need for increased vigilance and safety in our community. 

May God comfort the families of those precious children who perished and heal the injured.

The Torah commands us protect our lives, and those of others: “Guard yourself and guard your soul very much” (Deuteronomy 4:9). According to Jewish law, it is a duty to take all due precautions and avoid anything that may endanger life. “Anyone who violates such prohibitions, saying, ‘I’m only putting myself at risk — what business is that of anybody else?’ or ‘I’m not particular about such things’ deserves a lashing, while those who are careful about such things will be blessed” (Choshen Mishpat 427, 8-10).

Every family that cares for keeping the sanctity of the Sabbath also must care for the sanctity of life and take extra precautions to ensure the safety of our homes. 

Following are some guidelines in accordance with Jewish law:

All families must install dual-sensor smoke and fire alarms and additional carbon monoxide alarms around their homes, test them weekly, and gently vacuum them monthly. They should be installed in bedrooms, hallways, attics and basements; you can check the National Fire Protection Association website for details.

[MORE: Food safety guidelines for Shabbat observance in accordance with halachah:

To enjoy warm food on Shabbat, electric hot plates should be used with an appliance timer, which turns off at bedtime and back on in the morning. On Shabbat, solid foods should remain on the cooled hot plate overnight. On yom tov, when it is permitted to cook, any food can be placed back on the hot plate in the morning. 

Cholent or hamim can be cooked safely in an electric slow-cooker overnight. Remember to remove the pot insert from the slow cooker before serving the cholent in order to avoid stirring a cooked food in a cooking vessel. Also, the slow cooker can be put on a timer to turn off after your meal time.

Leaving a gas range on a low flame is common practice whether on Shabbat or on yom tov among Orthodox families — please be very cautious. Try to find alternatives. On Shabbat, use a metal blech to cover a low flame. On yom tov, any time the flame is not being used for cooking, cover with a pot of water. If a flame goes out  — turn off the gas immediately.

Ovens that have built-in Sabbath modes — which override the auto-shut-off function for the duration of a three-day holiday — have been tested for this use and are designed to safely operate for 72 hours.

We have a sacred duty to protect life. By educating ourselves, and protecting our families and communities with diligence in these and other safety issues, we are fulfilling that mitzvah. 

Tragic loss in Brooklyn sounds alarm across the Jewish world Read More »