fbpx

May 13, 2014

How to save Money on the Cost of Your Bar Mitzvah

From the cost of the catering, to the venue, and the entertainment, bar mitzvahs are expensive.  In fact, it is believed that some parents spend up to $17,000 on the cost of their child’s celebration.  Whilst it is easily possible to spend this amount of money, it is also possible to host a bar mitzvah on a budget.  This article aims to explain how to do just that.

Trim the Guest List

Creating a guest list for a bar mitzvah can be stressful.  However, one of the best ways to reduce this stress, and save yourself some money, is by cutting down the amount of people that you invite.  Close family, such as grandparents, cousins, aunts and uncles, should be considered first. However you may want to leave distant relatives, friends, Hebrew classmates and co-workers off the list unless your child has a special relationship with any of them, or has asked to invite someone specifically.

DIY

If you have an artistic or culinary streak, one great way to save money on the cost of your bar mitzvah is by creating your own decorations, and making your own food.  This can include everything from the invitations that you send out, to the party favours your guests receive, and the meal you serve.  Hiring caterers can reduce a lot of stress, however they are expensive, and by eliminating them, you can save a lot of money.

Have a House Party

Venues can cost a lot of money, especially if you are hiring caterers and other services as well.  Instead of hiring a venue, why not host your child’s bar mitzvah at home?  So long as you have a garden that is large enough to accommodate your guests, some wooden garden furniture to keep everyone seated, some outdoor lighting, and perhaps some heating to keep your guests warm after dark, you could have the perfect venue.  Yes, you will be responsible for cleaning up after the party, and making sure that your garden doesn’t get trashed, but when you see how much a venue costs, the money you are saving should more than make up for the extra effort.

Have a Double Bar Mitzvah

Many young people have birthdays at around the same time of year.  So, if you know of someone in your community who is planning a bar mitzvah, you may want to enquire about the possibility of hosting a joint party.  This could cut your costs considerably, and with twice the amount of guests the party is sure to be double the fun.  Hosting a double bar mitzvah can also lower your stress levels, as you will have help planning the event.

Stick to Your Budget

If you make a budget for your child’s bar mitzvah, make sure you stick to it.  Small things do add up, and it’s easy to overspend.  Be firm with your choices, and you should host a bar mitzvah that is not only in budget, but also will be remembered forever.  Good luck.

How to save Money on the Cost of Your Bar Mitzvah Read More »

Next Year Jerusalem: The Journey of a Lifetime

Next Year Jerusalem: The Journey of a Lifetime

Can a group of elderly nursing home residents travel abroad? The answer is yes – with care and love and a lot of planning. Such is the case for 8 residents (ages 87-97) of the Jewish Home for the Elderly in Connecticut, who journey to Israel with a film team, nursing companions, and the CEO of the Home, Andrew Banoff. Their journey is shown in the excellent documentary, Next Year Jerusalem: The Journey of a Lifetime.

 

Next Year Jerusalem: The Journey of a Lifetime. “>Lisa Niver, explained to me: “At the end of the Passover Seder, we say:  “Next year in Jerusalem!” As in next year will be different, we will be free from what enslaves us and celebrate together in Jerusalem. It is a joyous end to the seder meal where we retell the story and remember when Jews were slaves in Egypt and had to flee for freedom.”

 

This is the most tender, heart-warming movie I have ever seen. The people within are so vibrant and caring, the filmmaking is honest and respectful, and the elders are full of joie de vivre, wisdom, faith, and, of course, both trepidation and excitement about traveling. Some of the elders had never been out of the country, while others had traveled before. The film shows the entire range of the travel experience, from the excitement of planning to being in country to the readjustment of coming home.

 

It is remarkable to watch the elders being wheeled about the ruins and important sites, the jokes (especially by Bill, 97), the kindness, the cameras and smiles and joy. Truly, tears came to my eyes throughout the movie.

 

At the Western Wall, one bearded man hailed Leslie Novis (90), saying “Hey Grandpa!” and  then finding out when Leslie been there last, 40 years ago. The outpouring of kindness, help, faith, and comraderie at the Western Wall was both moving and a glimpse into the cultures of age, gender, and nationality.

 

Leslie Novis (90) visits Caesaria in Israel, as seen in Next Year
Jerusalem, a film by David Gaynes. “>For more information:

Director – David Gaynes
Run Time – 72 minutes
Language – English
Format – Digital (DCP & BluRay)
Year – 2014
Genre – Documentary

Note: Extra special thanks to First Run Features, who kindly sent a review copy of this movie. It has changed my life.

” rel=”author”> Jessica Voigts who is a mom who loves sharing the world with her daughter. She has a PhD in International Education, and is constantly looking for ways to increase intercultural understanding, especially with kids (it’s never too young to start!). She has lived and worked in Japan and London, and traveled around the world. Jessie is the publisher of Wandering Educators, a travel library for people curious about the world. She founded the Family Travel Bloggers Association, and the Youth Travel Blogging Mentorship Program. She’s published six books about travel and intercultural learning, with more on the way. You can usually find her family by water – anywhere in the world.

Next Year Jerusalem: The Journey of a Lifetime Read More »

Rand Paul’s Jewish outreach finds receptive if wary audience

Can Rand Paul woo his party’s Jews?

The Kentucky senator and likely candidate for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination is stepping up his Jewish outreach. In recent weeks, Paul chatted with rabbis on a conference call and proposed legislation to cut funding to the Palestinian Authority unless it recognizes Israel as a Jewish state.

Making inroads with Jewish Republicans is an uphill battle for Paul, an ardent anti-interventionist and opponent of foreign aid. A few years ago, Jewish Republicans were sounding alarms over Paul’s foreign policy views, which they saw as inimical to the U.S.-Israel alliance.

Now, however, some are sounding a more conciliatory note.

The Republican Jewish Coalition’s executive director, Matthew Brooks, told JTA that Paul has “evolved.”

“He started off wanting to cut all foreign aid. Now he sees it as a long-term strategy. He wants to start scaling back to countries burning flags in their streets,” said Brooks, referencing Paul’s calls to cut aid to countries that are hostile to the United States.

It’s a major shift from 2010 when Paul was running for Senate. At the time Brooks had called Paul a “neo-isolationist” who was “outside the comfort level of a lot of people in the Jewish community.”

The changing tone reflects new political realities. No longer an insurgent Senate candidate, Paul is now a rising power within the Republican Party who is widely assumed to have larger ambitions.

Fred Zeidman, a leading fundraiser for GOP presidential campaigns, said that Paul’s new stature is one reason he deserves a more considered assessment from Republican Jews.

“He is a force to be reckoned with in a presidential race, which I think he is seriously considering,” said Zeidman, a former chairman of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum who met recently in Houston with Paul.

Brooks declined to discuss the possibility of a Paul presidential run, saying that to do so before the midterm congressional elections would be “premature.”

Paul’s outreach to Jews is consistent with his message that the Republican Party needs to get out of its comfort zone and reach out to constituencies that usually do not back it.

“One of the biggest issues that Senator Paul faced when it came to the Jewish community was the simple fact that there was not a strong relationship,” said Rabbi Chaim Segal, an Orthodox educator and conservative activist based in New York who has assisted Paul in his recent outreach.

Part of Paul’s Jewish problem has been his parentage: His father, former Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), for decades was a critic of Israel, and his eponymous newsletters published pejorative material about gays, blacks and Jews. The elder Paul has since disclaimed knowledge of their contents.

The younger Paul backed his father’s 2012 presidential run. He has picked up his father’s libertarian and anti-interventionist agenda, updating it to heighten its appeal to mainstream conservatives.

Supporters of the younger Paul say he shouldn’t be held responsible for the sins of his father.

“If your dad did something, has a view, that has nothing to do with your views,” said Mallory Factor, who teaches political science at The Citadel, a South Carolina military academy, and initiated introductions between Paul and other Jewish Republicans. “That is a straw man. Criticize the guy and his own views.”

Paul’s Jewish supporters point to his outspoken advocacy of ending U.S. aid to potential enemies of Israel. But Paul’s new bill on Palestinian Authority funding has received a mixed reception from pro-Israel groups.

“We are not supporting the Paul bill,” an official with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee told JTA. “We believe the law currently on the books is strong and ensures that aid is contingent on key conditions that help maintain America’s influence, keep Israel secure and advance the peace process. AIPAC supports a cutoff of aid to any Palestinian government that includes an unreformed Hamas, and this is what is provided for in current law.”

Paul has told the conservative Newsmax media outlet that he finds AIPAC’s opposition to his bill “very troubling.”

“If I were to speak to the 10,000 folks who come up here [to Capitol Hill] in support of AIPAC, the vast majority of them would support my bill,” he said.

Paul’s legislation did win praise from the hawkish Zionist Organization of America, whose national president, Morton Klein, noted in an April 30 statement that he had raised the issue of U.S. funding for the Palestinian Authority in a meeting with Paul before the senator introduced his legislation.

“We are very pleased to see Senator Paul is taking action on this important issue,” Klein said in his statement.

Paul also has spoken at ZOA events.

But Ben Chouake, president of the New Jersey-based NORPAC, a leading pro-Israel political action committee, questioned the depth of Paul’s feeling for Israel. He noted that Paul is one of only two Republican senators who oppose new sanctions on Iran favored by AIPAC and an array of other pro-Israel groups.

“In terms of having the pro-Israel type of outlook, it would certainly help if he was not one of two Republicans not sponsoring the Iran sanctions legislation,” Chouake said.

Paul, according to a source close to him, opposes increasing punitive sanctions while nuclear talks aimed at keeping Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon are underway. That position would align him with the stance embraced by President Obama and many congressional Democrats.

Whatever differences he may have with pro-Israel activists, Paul has made a sustained effort to build bridges to the Jewish community, enlisting the services of several Jewish intermediaries and finding common ground where he can.

Richard Roberts, a pharmaceuticals executive and GOP donor, helped pay for Paul and a group of Christian Zionists to tour Israel in January 2013. That summer, Roberts hosted Paul for a luncheon at his home in the Orthodox stronghold of Lakewood, N.J., and led the senator on a tour of the town’s Beth Medrash Govoha, one of the world’s largest yeshivas.

In a video of the tour, Paul appears engaged and curious about Orthodoxy.

“Was the Talmud all finished by a certain period of time?” he asks a yeshiva student in the study hall. “Did Rabbi Hillel have anything to do with the Talmud?”

Roberts has called Paul a “man of integrity and authenticity.”

Ahead of Paul’s visits to cities with Jewish communities, Segal arranges off-the-record meetings with local rabbis. More recently, Segal organized a May 8 conference call with what he called 72 “rabbi leaders.”

Speaking after the call, Paul suggested frustration with constant questions about his friendship with Israel.

“You know, Meir Dagan is not exactly Benjamin Netanyahu,” he said, referring to the former Mossad chief and the Israeli prime minister, who differ with each other on Iran policy. “You know, they are different people, but that doesn’t mean either one of them loves Israel any less. It’s the same in America. Do all Jews have the same exact opinion on every political issue, or even how we should resolve or find peace in the Middle East? No.”

While Paul has managed to build some bridges, it remains to be seen whether he can translate that to support. His foreign policy views remain at odds with those of more hawkish and internationalist-leaning Jewish Republicans, while his mix of social conservatism and economic libertarianism may be a tough sell to the liberal-leaning American Jews more generally.

A top staffer at a pro-Israel group suggested that Paul’s true target in his outreach efforts may be pro-Israel Christians.

“He knows that he has a problem because many of the Tea Partiers who are his natural constituency happen to be pro-Israel,” said the staffer, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “This stand with Israel act will show up in campaign videos that are targeting the pro-Israel Christian community.”

But Paul may have his work cut out for him with this constituency.

Last September, he drew expressions of outrage from some prominent Christian supporters of Israel after saying in an interview with BuzzFeed that “some within the Christian community are such great defenders of the promised land and the chosen people that they think war is always the answer, maybe even preemptive war.”

Paul’s office later clarified that he “was not speaking of any group as a whole.”

David Brog, the Jewish executive director of Christians United for Israel, was among those who criticized Paul’s remark at the time. He told JTA that any serious Republican contender for the presidency must contend with Christian voters who support Israel.

“If he harbors national aspirations, the Christian conservative vote, a top issue in primaries, this becomes one of their core issues,” he said. “Do you share your passion for Israel and concern for Iran, or is there something weaker behind it?”

Rand Paul’s Jewish outreach finds receptive if wary audience Read More »

The Romantic Hart

 

It is rather unusual to think of Jewish artists as anything but extravagant or puzzling, yet there are always the rare exceptions, which mind you are a welcomed break from the extraordinary pieces we are usually accustomed to. The romantic Solomon Alexander Hart, whose work is a cross between European realism and Jewish melancholia, is an example of just that.

The style, colors, and mood of one of his most famous works: “The Feast of the Rejoicing of the Law at the Synagogue in Leghorn, Italy”, reminds the viewer of the prefabricated romanticism of 19th century Europe. The eye is immediately drawn to the main character which makes him the centerpiece of the painting. His very figure, clothes, as well as arrogant strut all seem to place him inside some European court setting. The painting could be found in the Palace of Versailles’ endless halls, amid its vast collections, only to blend comfortably within the systemic realistic style, with the only difference being that it depicts a scene where Jews are praying in a Shul, and the man is covered in a tallit and is carrying a Torah. Unheard of? No, not really.

Solomon Alexander Hart made it his joy to paint Jewish settings, and more importantly in the style that he was educated in. Namely realism. Something that was already saturated with popularity by the mid 19th century, it was the romantic and its flares more than anything else that caught the eye of viewers, and Hart as any ambitious painter wanted to reach out to as many people as possible. However he did more than that, he managed to fuse Jewish content with an European style to create an array of works.

Born in Plymouth, England in 1806 into a modest family, he grew up with a normal Jewish education, something which would stay with him for the rest of his life. Hart was also the first Jew to ever be admitted as a member of the Royal Academy, which was the prestigious art university where all the big-shot fancy English artists studied, taught, and lectured not only on the aesthetics of art, but also on the perplexing nature of it’s theories.

Hart made a name for himself with his above-average talent in relation to his peers, but what really made him unique was the fact that he was Jewish. Although England was bustling with Jewish artists at the time, it seems that his more European-styled paintings gained him the respect of the English public as well as that of the faculty at the Academy- which undoubtedly had made a social leap by letting a Jew amid their ranks. Let us not forget after all, this was during the Victorian age, where the term “stiff-upper lip” does not suffice to describe the period. After Hart made a living as a painter for a few years he soon gained a teaching position at the Academy, as well as a post as a librarian(a profession which was once far more respected than it is today).

His works derive from a very traditional style of realistic painting, but also with the romanticism that only pretentious literature could possibly make sense of. This, of course, was the time when the Impressionists did not yet take hold of Europe’s gaze and awe, but it was also the period when the art community was still fixated on the idea that art was meant to fill royal exhibition halls throughout Europe’s courts. Although Hart might have built his foundation on these principles, his works were still quite unique and indicative of his own style.

Throughout his life he continued to paint both Jewish subjects but also more conventional English ones, such as his numerous portraits which I suspect were the means by which he made most of his living from. The best example of this being his portrait of Sir David Salomons, the first Jewish sheriff and officially elected mayor in London's history. Although this might come as surprise to you, the truth is that England was somewhat less anti-Semitic than most other nations in Europe at the time, which is a reason why people like Solomon Hart could excel in what they did best.

Yet the issue of being both British and Jewish was never a problem for Hart, or really most Jews at the time, as they saw themselves as both things, and never as a part of two mutually exclusive identities. That is why the experience of “Jewishness” is so fascinating, not only historically but also in our own contemporary. Hart is a delightful example of the way the very concept of being Jewish, or even Judaism as a religion was and is molded culturally into different and unique entities. This, of course, not only at the collective level, but even individually for each and every person. In other words, Hart’s paintings are both Jewish and British, and maybe even a bit bourgeois, but that is okay, because that is what they are.

The Romantic Hart Read More »

No nuclear deal with Iran unless actions ‘verifiable,’ Obamas aide says

Iran must agree to “verifiable action” to satisfy U.S. concerns about its nuclear program or else there will be no final deal, President Barack Obama's top national security aide said on Monday on the eve of a new round of talks between Iran and world powers in Vienna.

Addressing an Israeli Independence Day celebration in Washington, U.S. national security adviser Susan Rice sought to reassure a pro-Israel audience that Washington would take a tough line with Tehran, despite Israeli worries that the Obama administration is giving up too much in the negotiations.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, during a visit to Tokyo on Monday, said Iran's nuclear program was a “clear and present danger” and Tehran cannot be allowed to get the capability to make nuclear arms.

A November interim accord easing sanctions on Iran made clear that Washington and five other world powers would let it enrich uranium on a limited scale under a final agreement. But Israel wants the Iranians to be stripped of all disputed nuclear projects, a demand that put it at odds with its chief ally, the United States.

“We all have a responsibility to give diplomacy a chance to succeed. But America won't be satisfied by mere words. We will only be satisfied by verifiable action from Iran,” Rice said to light applause from an audience that included Israeli diplomats and American supporters of the Jewish state.

“Put simply, if we are not satisfied, there will be no deal,” Rice, who visited Israel last week, said, promising continued consultations with Israeli officials.

Iran and the United States, France, Germany, Britain, China and Russia will meet in Vienna on Tuesday for a new round of negotiations aimed at reaching a broad diplomatic settlement of the decade-old nuclear dispute.

Iran, Israel's arch-foe in the region, denies it is seeking nuclear weapons capability. Israel is widely assumed to have the Middle East's only atomic arsenal.

“PAUSE” IN PEACE EFFORT

Rice also reaffirmed that the Obama administration would “stay true to the cause of peace” between Israel and the Palestinians, despite the recent breakdown of a nine-month diplomatic effort pushed by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry.

“Even though we have reached a pause in the negotiations, we continue to encourage the parties to work and act toward a future of peace,” Rice said.

But visiting Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz, who spoke after Rice and echoed her praise for the longstanding U.S.-Israeli alliance, hinted at lingering tensions between Washington and Israel over the failed talks.

Some Israeli officials took umbrage last week when U.S. envoy Martin Indyk singled out Jewish settlement construction on occupied land as one of the main reasons for the diplomatic collapse, even though he also faulted the Palestinians for signing 15 international treaties and conventions.

“We are eager to have peace not because somebody is telling us that we need peace,” said Steinitz, a Netanyahu confidant. But “because it's important for the state of Israel and Israelis.”

He said most Israelis would support “difficult concessions” but on two conditions – “that it will be a real genuine peace and real security.”

But neither Rice nor Steinitz offered any new path forward on a diplomatic track that appears to offer little hope for now.

Reporting By Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Ken Wills

No nuclear deal with Iran unless actions ‘verifiable,’ Obamas aide says Read More »

Girl Interrupted

My life has a habit of getting completely disrupted. I have all different kinds of disruptions that I tend to get myself into. Like the time I hosted a family of five with 3 dogs, 3 kids and 3 maids for 3 months, or the time I had my four younger siblings move in with us for a few years, or this time, when my sister and her husband and newborn stayed with us for two months while they looked for a new place after moving back from NYC. Now that my house is back to “museum clean”, quiet, tranquil and boring I am feeling lost, empty and completely void of any meaning. So now I feel frozen, (not the movie- ENOUGH w that damn movie)-  sad, stuck, paralyzed you know, spiraling in frozen fractals all around- {damn that movie again, can’t get it outta my head for two lousy seconds-}


Its funny, because when your life gets interrupted, while I adore the high of change, I can’t help realize that I have created this bad habit of getting addicted to that hamster in the cage insanity line- out of comfort. You know, where you do the same thing over and over, and eventually you do it again, cause you’re sure to do it better and more right next time even though it is exactly the same task without a hint of newness- you swear this time your life won’t derail, or get interrupted by welcoming a disruption and you’ll keep the same routine, you’ll continue on your path that you had before even if you’re interrupted a little bit? K its only me? Fine. I admit it, I am enslaved to my hamster cage addiction of disruption.

Here’s the thing, I really love hosting incredible friends and family in my home. I grew up with seven kids in my house, I love the noise, the crazy unpredictability it brings, the big dinners, the tears, the laughter, the joy reverberating in the house, but I also see that in my life, I tend to navigate towards unhealthy imbalance. I tend to veer towards this chaos, because to me chaos is comfortable. Oh MY G-d. I just admitted that out loud. That happened. I said I like chaos. I also hate it at the same time- no I hate myself for liking it at the same time. Therapists, please call me.

This past Passover, I was feeling really interrupted, more than usual. Rather than look at how good I am at procrastinating my writing projects, I just felt annoyed that G-d decided to disrupt me with this whole holiday thing. This time I didn’t have myself to blame for creating interruptions in my life, I got to blame G-d.  And I did it VERY well. Then I started thinking who else he has managed to interrupt. There’s one of my dear friends who was just diagnosed with Breast Cancer. Her life has been hugely interrupted, OH MY WORD, breast cancer is G-d’s big fat interruption.  I’m liking this blame game. See, I can go all day at blaming G-d for his interruption wars.  And I do that very well. LIKE I’m NIKE PRO at it. It is so much easier than blaming myself for allowing interruptions to become my procrastination tool. What about those 300 Nigerian girls who got kidnapped- isn’t that a big fat G-d interruption? What the hell was He thinking there??
Don’t get me started on the Malaysian interruption.

Why is it that I’m okay if I interrupt my own life. Heck, I usually welcome it, even if in the end it is not the best idea for me. But for some reason, I don’t have any tolerance for God’s interruptions? Sometimes I would rather be the interrupter than wait for G-d to do it, since I’ve had a history of Him doing it at epic proportions.  Mine as well beat Him to the punch, ya know.  But all this blaming has me wondering if maybe I’m completely blinding myself to the real lesson of the gifts disruption brings.

There are a few things I have learned about what happens when life gets interrupted. Interruption has forced me to navigate towards my values.  It has forced me to become choosy about what I want to spend time on versus what I have to spend time on. It has also given me pause to look at my routine and reevaluate it based on the new one that has now become my disrupted one because I have to redesign my life based on my new reality. And suddenly my new reality brings new perspective. And when things go back to the way they were- the “normal” state, my life is always renewed and refreshed and reevaluated very differently.  I usually end up learning a thing or two about myself because of those disruptions, whether I want to or not.

Obviously I can’t continue to blame G-d for using my destiny to interrupt my life, nor can I punish myself when my own life gets disrupted by hosting friends or family I love having over. Rather, I can find a way to embrace those changing moments and maybe spend more time nesting in a healthy boring, “museum clean”, quiet, tranquil home when it is quiet and pondering the lessons I have been fortunate to receive once those interruptions have left. (no this is not an invitation for anyone reading this to move in. There’s a reason I don’t have a blinking red sign outside that says “Come in we’ll leave the light on for ya.”).

Maybe I’m not as frozen as I think I am. Maybe I’m just tempering myself for new waters- unchartered waters. Today there is no 5 month-old baby cooing in the background, no bottles piled up on the counter, no baby blankets taking space up on the floor. Its quiet around here. Life is back to “normal.” Or is it?

 

Girl Interrupted Read More »

ADL survey: More than a quarter of the world is anti-Semitic

A lot of people around the world hate the Jews.

That’s the main finding of the Anti-Defamation League’s largest-ever worldwide survey of anti-Semitic attitudes.

The survey, released Tuesday, found that 26 percent of those polled — representing approximately 1.1 billion adults worldwide — harbor deeply anti-Semitic views. More than 53,000 people were surveyed in 102 countries and territories covering approximately 86 percent of the world’s population.

“Our findings are sobering but, sadly, not surprising,” ADL National Director Abraham Foxman said at a news conference Tuesday morning at ADL’s national headquarters in New York. “The data clearly indicates that classic anti-Semitic canards defy national, cultural, religious and economic boundaries.”

Among the survey’s key findings:

• Some 70 percent of those considered anti-Semitic said they have never met a Jew. Overall, 74 percent of respondents said they had never met a Jew.
• Thirty-five percent of those surveyed had never heard of the Holocaust. Of those who had, roughly one-third said it is either a myth or greatly exaggerated.
• The most anti-Semitic region in the world is the Middle East and North Africa, with 74 percent harboring anti-Semitic views. Eastern Europe was second at 34 percent. The least anti-Semitic region was Oceania (Australia and New Zealand) at 14 percent.
• The three countries outside the Middle East with the highest rates of anti-Semitic attitudes were Greece, at 69 percent, Malaysia at 61 percent and Armenia at 58 percent.
• About 49 percent of Muslims worldwide harbor anti-Semitic views, compared to 24 percent of Christians.
• The West Bank and Gaza were the most anti-Semitic places surveyed, with 93 percent of respondents expressing anti-Semitic views. The Arab country with the lowest level of anti-Semitic views was Morocco, at 80 percent. Iran ranked as the least anti-Semitic country in the Middle East, at 56 percent.
• The least anti-Semitic country overall was Laos, where 0.2 percent of the population holds anti-Semitic views. The Philippines, Sweden, the Netherlands and Vietnam all came in at 6 percent or lower.
• Approximately 9 percent of Americans and 14 percent of Canadians harbor anti-Semitic attitudes.
• Thirty-four percent of respondents older than 65 were deemed anti-Semitic, compared to 25 percent of those younger than 65. Men polled were slightly more anti-Semitic than women.

“The ADL’s Global 100 index will serve as a baseline,” Foxman said. “For the first time we have a real sense of how pervasive and persistent anti-Semitism is today around the world.”

The survey gauged anti-Semitism by asking whether respondents agreed with an index of 11 statements that the ADL believes suggest anti-Jewish bias: Jews talk too much about what happened to them during the Holocaust; Jews are more loyal to Israel than to the countries they live in; Jews think they are better than other people; Jews have too much power in international financial markets; Jews have too much power in the business world; Jews have too much control over global affairs; people hate Jews because of the way Jews behave; Jews have too much control over the U.S. government; Jews have too much control over global media; Jews are responsible for most of the world’s wars; Jews don’t care about what happens to anyone but their own kind.

Respondents who agreed that a majority of the statements are “probably true” were deemed anti-Semitic.

Over the years, the ADL has been criticized for overstating what qualifies as anti-Semitism, with critics suggesting that some of the statements used to measure bias actually are more indicative of admiration for Jews than anti-Jewish hostility.

Foxman addressed such criticism on Tuesday.

“We frequently get accused of seeing anti-Semitism everywhere, and we’re very conscious about the credibility,” he said. “We were cautious, we were conservative, to understate rather than overstate.”

The survey was overseen by First International Resources and conducted by Anzalone Liszt Grove Research. It included telephone and in-person surveys conducted in 96 languages between July 2013 and February 2014. At least 500 adults were interviewed in each of the countries surveyed. The margin of error is 4.4 percent in countries with 500 interviews and 3.2 percent in countries with 1,000 interviews. The study was funded by New York philanthropist Leonard Stern; the ADL declined to say how much it cost.

The survey also questioned respondents about their attitudes toward Israel. Outside the Middle East, Israel’s favorable rating was 37 percent, compared to 26 percent unfavorable. Within the Middle East, Israel’s unfavorable rating rose to 84 percent. The only other region where Israel’s unfavorable rating outweighed its favorable was Asia: 30 percent unfavorable, compared to 26 percent favorably.

Asked how many Jews they believe there are worldwide, more than half of the respondents significantly overestimated the number. Some 30 percent said Jews comprise between 1 and 10 percent of the world’s population, 18 percent said the figure was larger than 10 percent, and 9 percent said more than 20 percent of all people are Jewish. The actual figure is 0.19 percent of the world’s population, according to the ADL.

After the Palestinian-populated territories, the most anti-Semitic places were Iraq, where 92 percent harbor anti-Semitic views; Yemen at 88 percent; Algeria and Libya at 87 percent; Tunisia at 86 percent; Kuwait at 82 percent; and Bahrain and Jordan at 81 percent.

Israel was not included in the survey.

“It is very evident that the Middle East conflict matters with regard to anti-Semitism,” Foxman said. “It just is not clear whether the Middle East conflict is the cause of or the excuse for anti-Semitism. There is no statistical data at this moment to support causality.”

After Laos, anti-Semitism was lowest in the Philippines at 3 percent; Sweden at 4 percent; the Netherlands at 5 percent; Vietnam at 6 percent; the United Kingdom at 8 percent, the United States and Denmark at 9 percent; Tanzania at 12 percent; and Thailand at 13 percent.

In Western Europe, the most anti-Semitic countries were Greece (69 percent) and France (37 percent). In Eastern Europe, Poland (45 percent) and Bulgaria (44 percent) topped the list, and the Czech Republic was the least anti-Semitic, at 13 percent.

In the Americas, Panama (52 percent) and the Dominican Republic (41 percent) ranked as most anti-Semitic. In Sub-Saharan Africa, Senegal was the most anti-Semitic, at 56 percent. The least were Uganda, Nigeria, Ghana and Tanzania, all at between 16 and 12 percent.

The most commonly held stereotype among the ADL’s list of 11 statements was that Jews are more loyal to Israel than to their home country — a view held by 41 percent of respondents. More than one-third agreed with the statements that Jews have too much power in the business world and in international financial markets, that Jews think they are better than other people and that Jews don’t care what happens to anyone but their own kind.

ADL survey: More than a quarter of the world is anti-Semitic Read More »

Seven Ukrainian soldiers killed in separatist ambush

Seven Ukrainian soldiers were killed and seven wounded on Tuesday when their armored column was ambushed by pro-Russian separatists near the eastern Ukrainian town of Kramatorsk, the defence ministry and state security service said.

It was the biggest single loss of life by the Ukrainian army since soldiers were sent into the mainly Russian-speaking east of the country to break up armed separatist groups who have seized control of towns and public buildings to push their demands for autonomy.

The ministry, in a statement published on its website, said an armoured column came under fire as it approached a bridge near a village 12 miles from Kramatorsk, one of several hot spots in the region where the army has had only limited success against the separatists.

About 30 rebels, who had taken cover among bushes along a river, attacked with grenade-launchers and automatic weapons, immediately killing two soldiers and wounding three others, it said.

“In all, as a result of the prolonged fighting, six members of the armed forces were killed. Eight soldiers were wounded, one of them seriously,” it said.

The state security service (SBU) said later that the seriously wounded soldier had died while being transported to hospital.

Before the Kramatorsk incident, Defence Minister Mikhailo Koval said a total of nine servicemen had been killed so far in the army's “anti-terrorist” operation, which has been directed mainly against rebels in the towns of Slaviansk and Mariupol.

The dead included five pilots, Koval said, who apparently died when their helicopters were downed by separatist fire.

Writing by Richard Balmforth; Editing by Mark Trevelyan

Seven Ukrainian soldiers killed in separatist ambush Read More »