fbpx

December 9, 2013

The Price for Dylan Going Electric

TOLDJA! UPDATE; DYLAN GUITAR SELLS FOR $965,000 MORE THAN PREVIOUS RECORD-HOLDER CLAPTON TO ANONYMOUS BUYER

Bob Dylan playing the guitar. Image Courtesy of The Estate of David Gahr/Getty Images

Bob Dylan playing the guitar. Image Courtesy of The Estate of David Gahr/Getty Images

The guitar stood on a stand in a small conference room in corporate offices in Beverly Hills. A black Fender Stratocaster with a white body plate, a few nicks to its side, it looked simple, basic, uncomplicated.

Yet the story that brings this particular musical instrument to auction at Christies in New York on Dec. 6 has put an estimated value on it of $300,000 to $500,000. Let me venture a prediction: it will sell for $1 million.

The guitar belonged to Bob Dylan. The story goes that he left it on a private plane chartered for him by Albert Grossman, his manager in 1965 (or 1966).  Fast forward to 2011, when a young woman, Dawn Peterson, contacted A&E’s program, ”History Detectives,” to ask if they could authenticate an electric guitar she found in the attic of her father, Victor Quinto,  a private pilot who died in 1971. Her claim was that Dylan left the guitar on board his plane, that at the time Quinto had contacted Dylan’s management to ask if they wanted its return – that they had said not to bother – that they would get Dylan another guitar. And so the guitar stayed in her family until she uncovered it, and she wondered if indeed it once belonged to Dylan and what it was worth.

Suffice to say that Grossman is dead, and Dylan and his family never knew, or else never heard of this offer to return the guitar. The guitar was housed in a traveling case that had clearly stamped on it, “Property of Ashes and Sand, Inc.,” which was Dylan’s production company at the time. Inside was the guitar strap and several handwritten and typewritten song manuscripts. Perhaps others would have made more effort to return what was clearly not theirs. However, as a legal matter, regardless of how the guitar ended up in her possession, under what are invariably referred to as “finder’s keepers” statutes, it now belonged to her.

The “History Detectives” devoted an episode devoted to the guitar in 2012. Andy Babuik of Fab Gear, a guitar expert, examined the guitar’s wood finish and the thin lines among the frets and treated them as the fingerprints of the guitar – matching them to photographs of Dylan at recording sessions and performances of that time and concluded that not only was the guitar Dylan’s; not only was it used at the recording sessions for “Bringing it All Back Home”; not only was it the guitar used at his Forest Hills, NY performance in August 1965 – it was the historic electric guitar that Dylan played at the Newport Folk Festival in the summer of 1965, when Dylan shocked the folk world by “going electric” – certainly one of the most famous musical events of popular music history.

The guitar ready for auction. Photo from Christie Imgages LTD. 2013

The guitar itself is simple. The story that surrounds it, and the occasions on which it was used, rich. My guess, and it is only a guess, is that Dylan in 1965 and 1966 was not carrying his own guitars anymore and was probably not in charge of getting it on and off planes. However, even if he left the guitar on the plane, he would either have assumed someone else would retrieve it for him, or assumed that it would be easily retrieved. No one at the time ascribed historic importance or value to the guitar. Once it was gone, Dylan, in the words of one of his songs, probably “didn’t think twice.” At the time Dylan’s record company, CBS owned Fender, and, no doubt, they were eager to supply a replacement.

The guitar is being sold with its case stenciled, as mentioned before, with the words “Property of Ashes and Sand, Inc.,” and the guitar strap inside. The song manuscripts are being auctioned in separate lots, one of which eventually appeared on “Blonde on Blonde,” and others appeared on “Biography” and were authenticated by Jeff Gold, a Dylan expert and collector of Dylan autographic material. Christies also engaged these same experts and, once assured of the authenticity of the guitar and manuscript, prepared the items for the Dec. 6 New York auction.

For comparison’s sake, one of the highest amounts ever paid for an electric guitar at auction is $959,000 for “Blackie,” Eric Clapton’s favorite fender Stratocaster, used on “Layla,” which he sold to benefit his Crossroads Centre, a drug and alcohol rehabilitation facility in the Caribbean. I’d be surprised if Dylan’s guitar goes for less.

Still, if it were up to me, I’d return the guitar to Dylan. That would be the right thing to do.  It’s his, simple as that.

That being said, I’m not one to begrudge anyone else getting rich by legal means. So here’s my somewhat Solomonic solution: Dylan (or one of his representatives) should just buy the guitar back. It’s my understanding that in recent years Paul McCartney has been buying up Beatles memorabilia anonymously on eBay and at auction — because he can and because he prefers to own his own history rather than have others trade on it.

Dylan, I imagine, is less attached to his own things and certainly less attached to his past. Even the film of his 1965 European tour is called “Don’t Look Back.” So I understand if he has no interest in participating in other’s profiting from the sale of what was his. However, that guitar was the sword and the shield that he took into battle, and in the end, he might appreciate his old friend more than the money it would take for its return.

But let’s be clear: Dylan going electric would have happened regardless of the guitar, and its significance has everything to do with Dylan and nothing to do with the guitar itself. Yet it is the stories we invest in objects like this simple electric guitar that give a context, an importance and a meaning to these events. And yes, a value to them as well.

The Price for Dylan Going Electric Read More »

Mourning Paul and Seffy, lighting up Africa, changing the UN and more -This week from Israel!

Goodbye, Seffy

Only a week after Israeli lost one of its greatest musicians, Arik Einstein, we all said goodbye to one our greatest comedians. Israeli actor and comedian Yosef (Seffy) Rivlin died Tuesday at the age of 66. Rivlin, who battled cancer for many years and even lost his voice as a result of the disease, was hospitalized for two weeks ago in serious condition at the hospice at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, where he passed away.

Read more “>here.

 

 

An unexpected invitation

It is not just Australia that is helping the UN take a more balanced towards Israel: For the first time, Israel has been invited to join the “Western European and Others” regional group at the UN Human Rights Council. This marks a major diplomatic achievement that significantly increases Jerusalem’s ability to advance its interests at the Geneva-based body. The Human Rights Council is not known for maintaining an objective point of view, condemning Israel more than countries that significantly violate human rights, such as Syria or China. 

Read more “> here.

 

 

What does Apple have planned in Israel?

Jonathan Medved,  a leading American Israeli Venture Capitalist, explains in an interview to CNN why is the Israeli high tech sector continue to bloom. Plus, shares Apple’s future plans at the Start Up Nation.

Watch “> here

 

 

Honoring lone soldiers during Hanukkah

While Americans across Israel chowed down on turkey latkes and cranberry sufganiyot during the eight nights of Hanukkah, lone soldiers originally from the land of the free also got to join in the festivities at a number of parties organized in their honor thanks to Nefesh B'Nefesh,American Jewish Committee, and the Michael Levin Lone Soldier Center.

Read more “>here.

Mourning Paul and Seffy, lighting up Africa, changing the UN and more -This week from Israel! Read More »

December 9, 2013

The US

Headline: Syrian opposition head fears U.S.-Iran thaw could benefit Assad

To Read: Abraham Soafer writes about the (fiscally prudent) future of US Foreign Policy-

Efforts to limit the flexibility available to the US to develop a grand strategy based on advanced technologies, relatively inexpensive methods, and selective engagements may ultimately fail, but should be taken seriously. A strong tendency exists that disfavors relatively inexpensive interventions. That requires political and military planners to take into account that grand strategies based on the view that the US will be able to take full advantage of its claimed technological superiority, and limit its interventions as it sees fit, may be mistaken.

Quote: “Rightly or wrongly, the administration’ view the jihadist opposition as the real enemy. What they would like is for the U.S.-backed centrists and moderates to work with the regime against the real extremists. The Iranians would like to see that as well”, Jim Hooper, a former US diplomat in Damascus, commenting on the Obama Administration's attitude toward Syria's rebels.

Number: 47, the percentage of Americans who believe that the rich poor income gap in America is a very big problem.

 

Israel

Headline: Lapid: Peace talks may lead to coalition realignment

To Read: Rafael Ahren examines the connection between the US' recent Iran policy shifts and its attitude toward Israel-Palestine-

At the United Nations General Assembly in September, US President Barack Obama said, “In the near term, America’s diplomatic efforts will focus on two particular issues: Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons, and the Arab-Israeli conflict.” The obvious juxtaposition of the two not-directly-related issues suggested the president sought to revive a venerable formula known in Hebrew as “Gar’in tmurat Falestin” — the nuclear issue in exchange for Palestine. Routinely rejected by American and Israeli officials, this often-quoted theory postulates that Washington is willing to be tough on Iran if Jerusalem is forthcoming on the Palestinian issue. But statements Obama made Saturday suggest the opposite is now the case.

Quote: “There is no connection between these two issues”, US ambassador denying the aforementioned connection between the two issues.

Number: 5,000, the number of Hezbollah rockets that can reach Tel Aviv, according to Israeli officials.

 

The Middle East

Headline: Chemical watchdog warns of Syria delay

To Read: Daniel Kurtzer, Seyed Hossein Mousavian, and Thomas Pickering argue that the deal with Iran (imperfect as it is) is a genuine opportunity on many fronts, including Syria Afghanistan and Iraq-

Complete, timely implementation will not only build trust and credibility but will also significantly improve the atmosphere and prospects for a full agreement within the next six months. Such a trend would facilitate further constructive cooperation between Iran and the world powers on other crises in the Middle East such as Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq. The interim agreement — and its faithful implementation — is a significant opportunity which should not be missed or it will constitute a failure of unimaginable proportions.

Quote: “We are concerned about the tensions arising from the presence of foreign forces in the region and believe that all foreign forces should exit the region and Afghanistan’s security should be ceded to the people of that country”, Iran's President Rouhani making a statement about foreign (mainly US) presence in Afghanistan.

Number: 18, the number of people killed yesterday in a car bombing in Iraq.

 

The Jewish World

Headline: Ex-chief rabbi: I warned against Metzger

To Read: Rick Rickman takes a look at early Zionist leader Ze'ev Jabotinsky's plans to organize an international Jewish army to fight the Nazis right before his death in 1940-

On June 18, Vladimir Jabotinsky, head of the New Zionist Organization, was in New York City, preparing to deliver an address the next evening at the 4,500-seat Manhattan Center. He had spoken there in March to an overflow crowd of 5,000 people; now he held a press conference to preview the second address: he would call for a Jewish Army to fight “the giant rattlesnake.” On June 19 another overflow crowd showed up at the Manhattan Center, despite an extraordinary public effort by American Jewish leaders to thwart the event.

Quote: “In light of the ongoing rash of assaults that have left many residents frightened to walk around our neighborhood alone, I am asking the NYPD to move forward on the installation of these security cameras as soon as possible”, New York City Councilman David Greenfield responding to a case of violence against a Jewish woman in NY on Saturday.

Number: 94, the age of an alleged Auschwitz guard who was deemed unfit to stand trial in Germany.

December 9, 2013 Read More »

The Premature End of the Lapid-Bennett Alliance

The last Israeli elections forced Prime Minister Netanyahu to form a coalition he didn't really like. But it was the coalition most Israelis seemed to want, at the center of which two parties played the leading role: secular-centrist YeshAtid, and Zionist-religious Habayit Hayehudi. A somewhat strange alliance was formed between two parties that did not agree on many things but on the other hand were both representative of a younger generation of Israelis that are all tired of old political formulations and want a government that represents the centrist majority and not minority special interests. “The most surprising, revolutionary and positive result of the last elections”, I wrote.

On Election Night I also wrote that “Israelis by and large rejected radicalism and voted for moderation. Economically, they opted for Lapid, not for the much more combative (at times socialist) message of Yachimovitch. On the peace front, the hard right disappeared. The right became stronger but not as strong as it was hoping to be, and one must remember that it got stronger by putting on a more moderate appearance. Both Bennett and Lapid understand that moderation is what the voters want”.

The alliance between Bennet and Lapid, between these two very different parties – one a right-wing-settler-religious party, the other urban-liberal-centrist-Tel-Avivian party – was refreshing. And it was potentially revolutionary: dealing with Haredi political power could only happen with these two parties holding the reins; looking for pragmatic solutions which are acceptable to most Israelis on state-religion issues seemed possible when these two parties agreed that reducing the level of religious tension is good for Israel. The idea was quite simple: we can't agree on everything but there's more than enough for us to do within the areas of mutual agreement.

But the alliance is now in trouble – predictably so one must say (“Israel's new coalition is problematic, and its chances for long-term survival seem slim”, March 14, 2013). The reasons for this are many.

Some of it is the result of PM Netanyahu's maneuvering of Lapid, the rookie. Lapid was too quick to make a claim to Netanyahu's throne, and Netanyahu, always the political paranoid, made sure to put him where he'll learn a lesson and be reduced to a position of someone who can't challenge him (that is, he appointed him Finance Minister). Netanyahu's great success in this endeavor hurt Lapid's party in the polls: the party is 19 mandates strong in the Knesset but would only get 10 mandates if elections were held today (you can see the numbers in our Israel Poll Trend tracker). And it hurt Lapid himself. Two different public approval polls conducted in the last couple of days by pollsters Camil Fuchs and Menachem Lazar put Lapid at the bottom of the list of ministers. The percentage of Israelis who still believe that Lapid is Prime Ministerial material is a meager 3%.

Some of it was the natural disappointment of voters who had little sense of loyalty to Lapid's new party to begin with. Lapid's rise was enabled by Israelis who were searching for the new trendy idea to vote for. They boarded his wagon, and later abandoned it, as was expected. Even a great politician could hardly answer all the demands and wishes of such voters. And Lapid proved to be less than a great politician, making too many unnecessary mistakes along the way (one example here).

The result is a party with great dreams having to deal with a melancholic political reality (again, look at the updated Poll Trend tracker), having a problematic alliance with a party – HabayitHayehudi – that is doing annoyingly better in the polls. Friction became Yesh Atid's only way to get more attention and to try to reverse the trend of voter abandonment. Thus, the gaps between this party and its right-wing sister – gaps that were constructively hidden earlier –needed to be emphasized.

So the two parties went to war over the Haredi draft – the achievement they were jointly supposed to provide. And they have gone to war, in recent days, over gay rights – a secondary issue but one around which it is easy to build a campaign based on differences. They are now at war over the peace process – Lapid hinted today that a change in the coalition might be necessary to achieve peace. In essence he expressed his willingness to abandon Bennett over a goal they, and their respective voters, do not share.

These are sad news for those who liked the shared agenda of the two parties, and the new tone of Israeli politics. It also might not be so good for Netanyahu. When coalitions crumble things get ugly and the result is not always predictable. Obviously, Netanyahu might have other options for a coalition. He can stay with Bennett and invite the Haredi parties in (but TzipiLivni'sHatnua might also leave under such circumstances). Or he can dump Bennett, whom he doesn't really like personally, and invite the Labor Party, under the new leadership of Isaac Herzog, into the coalition – on the pretense of having to save the peace process (but this can hurt Herzog, and it can complicate Netanyahu's life within the Likud Party).

In other words: the end of the Lapid-Bennet alliance is a headache for everyone involved because of both the policies and the political implications it portends. Is there a way for the parties to go back to their old habit of being on good terms? We know from experience that when parties begin to position themselves for the next round of political battles – whether it's a change in the coalition or a nearing election– it is very hard for them to stop. The political genie is out of the bottle. Unfortunately, this has all happened a little too soon, as the alliance has yet to achieve all it could achieve for the better of the country.

The Premature End of the Lapid-Bennett Alliance Read More »

Iran, six powers meet on steps to carry out nuclear deal

Iran and six world powers began expert-level talks on Monday to work out nitty-gritty details in implementing a landmark accord for Tehran to curb its disputed nuclear program in return for a limited easing of sanctions.

The preliminary accord is seen as a first step towards resolving a decade-old standoff over suspicions Iran might be covertly pursuing a nuclear weapons “breakout” capability, a perception that has raised the risk of a wider Middle East war.

Officials from Iran and the United States, France, Germany, Britain, China and Russia met at the Vienna headquarters of the U.N. nuclear agency, which will play a central role in verifying that Tehran carries out its part of the interim deal.

The outcome of the meeting is expected to determine when Iran stops its most sensitive nuclear activity and when it gets the respite in sanctions that it has been promised in return.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said it would have “some involvement” in the discussions, which are expected to continue on Tuesday. Media were barred from the floor where the meeting, held under tight secrecy, took place.

The talks are aimed at “devising mechanisms” for the Geneva accord's implementation, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi was quoted by state Press TV as saying. Iranian nuclear as well as central bank officials would take part, he said.

Western diplomats said detailed matters not addressed at the Nov. 20-24 talks in Geneva must be ironed out before the deal can be put into practice.

These include how and when the IAEA, which regularly visits Iranian nuclear sites to try to ensure there are no diversions of atomic material, will carry out its expanded role.

A start to sanctions relief would hinge on verification that Iran was fulfilling its side of the accord, they said.

The deal was designed to halt Iran's nuclear advances for a period of six months to buy time for negotiations on a final settlement of the standoff. Diplomats say implementation may start in January after the technical details have been settled.

Scope for easing the dispute peacefully opened after the June election of a comparative moderate, Hassan Rouhani, as Iranian president. He won in a landslide by pledging to ease Tehran's international isolation and win relief from sanctions that have severely damaged the oil producer's economy.

ARAK REACTOR

Diplomats caution that many difficult hurdles remain to overcome – including differences over the scope and capacity of Iran's nuclear project – for a long-term solution to be found.

In a sign of this, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pressed the powers on Sunday to take a hard line with Iran in negotiations on a final agreement, urging them to demand that Tehran abandon all uranium enrichment.

A day after President Barack Obama deemed it unrealistic to believe Iran could be compelled to dismantle its entire nuclear infrastructure, Netanyahu said Tehran should have to take apart all centrifuges used to refine uranium.

Israel sees Iran, which has repeatedly said it seeks only civilian energy from uranium enrichment, as a mortal threat. Iran says it is Israel, widely believed to be the Middle East's only nuclear-armed power, that threatens peace.

Under last month's pact, Iran will halt the activity most applicable to producing nuclear weapons – enrichment of uranium to a higher fissile concentration of 20 percent – and stop installing components at its Arak heavy-water research reactor which, once operating, could yield bomb-grade plutonium.

In the Vienna talks, government experts will also discuss details of which components Iran is not allowed to add to the Arak reactor under the deal, as well as issues pertaining to the sequencing of gestures by both sides, the diplomats said.

Officials from the office of European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who coordinates talks with Iran on behalf of the six powers, were also at the meeting.

Additional reporting by Isabel Coles in Dubai; Editing by Mark Heinrich

Iran, six powers meet on steps to carry out nuclear deal Read More »

Netanyahu to skip Mandela memorial due to high travel, security costs

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will not attend a memorial service in South Africa for Nelson Mandela due to the high cost of transportation and security.

The decision was announced late Sunday, hours before Netanyahu’s scheduled departure the following day for the memorial event to be held Tuesday at Johannesburg’s FNB stadium.

Some 70 world leaders, many heads of states, as well as all living U.S. presidents and more than two dozen members of the U.S. Congress, are scheduled to attend the event, which will include about 150,000 people.

Israeli President Shimon Peres, recovering from the flu, decided not to attend the memorial after consulting with his doctor, according to the Times of Israel. The costs to send the president reportedly are significantly lower.

Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein or Justice Minister Tzipi Livni will represent Israel at the funeral, according to the Times of Israel.

Netanyahu’s decision comes less than a week after the disclosure of the high amount of taxpayer money spent on the prime minister’s official residence and his two private residences.

The cost to send Netanyahu to the Mandela memorial would have been nearly $2 million, including chartering a private plane and transporting security personnel and equipment, according to Haaretz.

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators reportedly were expected to greet Netanyahu in South Africa.

Netanyahu to skip Mandela memorial due to high travel, security costs Read More »

Israel is the leader in producing drones

This story originally ran on themedialine.org.

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV’s) are being used in conflicts all over the world, and military analysts say their use is only expected to increase. With the clear advantage of not needing pilots, who can be shot down or captured, sophisticated drones can perform many of the same tasks as manned aircraft.

“The Heron, made by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) can carry several payloads at the same time — it’s a multi-mission multi-payload UAV,” Dan Bichman, a consultant for IAI and a reserve pilot in the Israeli Airforce told The Media Line as he proudly showed off the large drone. “Once I’m in the air, I can carry simultaneously 4 or 5 different payloads, and I can conduct a mission using all of them at the same time which is very unique in the UAV world. Another advantage is that I can stay in the air for up to 50 hours.”

Bichman said the US, France and Germany are all using Israeli-made Herons in Afghanistan to fly spy missions. He said several other countries have bought the systems, but he refused to give details.

He was speaking at a recent UAV conference in this Tel Aviv suburb, where more than 1500 drone buyers and sellers came together. They came to watch live demonstrations, meet with manufacturers, and compare prices. There was a significant representation from Asia, especially China and Singapore, although both journalists and buyers refused to be interviewed.

“This is the first international conference in the world that shows in one place unmanned systems in the air, on the ground, and on water,” Arieh Egozi, the editor of the IhLS, Israel Homeland Security website and the conference organizer told The Media Line. “Israel is a superpower in unmanned systems. They started with unmanned aerial systems and they have been flying now for more than 40 years.”

IAI announced that its systems have accumulated more than one million operational flight hours.

He said that Israel, which is the leading manufacturer in the world of UAV systems, has a range of systems.

“Israel has developed some systems as small as a butterfly, and others, like the Heron TP, which has a wingspan of 37 meters, which is like a Boeing 737,” Egozi said.

He stood in front of a large vehicle called an Air Mule, currently under development.

“The job of this system is to bring water and ammunition to the front line, and to evacuate wounded soldiers,” he said. “In the Lebanon war (of 2006) a helicopter was shot down when it tried to rescue wounded soldiers. If you use unmanned systems you don’t endanger any pilots.” 

These systems do not come cheap. Israel’s defense exports last year topped 10 billion dollars. Some of the larger drones cost several million dollars depending on what kind of cameras they are fitted with. At the Israeli booths offering systems for sale, former generals abound.

“We are a start-up company and we have developed a revolutionary vehicle called the Hovermast,” Gabi Shachor, a retired air force general and CEO of Skysapience told The Media Line. “It sits on a vehicle and with the push of a button the doors open and the Hovermast rises up to 50 meters. Within seconds you get real time video into your vehicle. Because it’s tethered to a vehicle by cable, it can stay up as long as you like – six hours or two days.”

He says the Israeli army has bought two systems for operational evaluations and his company are currently selling more, at about one million per system.

“If you buy a lot, I can give you a very good price,” he says laughing.

He says Israel sees the future of combat in UAVs.

“Israel is already leading in this area and UAV’s will do more and more of what is done today by manned platforms,” he said. “There’s no risk, since there’s no pilot. You can stay airborne for a long time. A pilot can’t stay up that long.”

Looking around the conference hall, there were very few women in evidence. Ofra Bechor, a field application engineer for Green Hills software, a US company which has a branch in Israel, says the UAV field is dominated by men.

“Software and defense are fields that have a lot of men,” she told The Media Line. “I’ve never been discriminated against because I’m a woman but I have been ignored when there are men around.”

Israel is the leader in producing drones Read More »

Maria Suarez: Human Trafficking Survivor, Advocate, and Unsung Hero

Maria Suarez is the Volunteer Coordinator and a paraprofessional Talkline Counselor for the Women Helping Women department at NCJW/LA. She is warm, kind, always smiling, and a great cook who loves to bring in her famous dishes to work to share with colleagues. She is also a survivor of human trafficking. This year Maria received the “>Click here to read the rules and regulations or to submit a poster.

2) LA County Human Trafficking Poster Outreach Project: On February 9, 2013, the Project Partners will hold a training session at NCJW/LA to train volunteers to visit businesses throughout LA County, provide them with information about the new law, give them the poster to put up, and track the information on their posting. For more information on this phase of the project, email me at maya@ncjwla.org.

Maria Suarez: Human Trafficking Survivor, Advocate, and Unsung Hero Read More »

Eddie Carmona, Barack Obama, and Me

Last Thursday, I met two extraordinary gentlemen in the span three hours.   I was invited, along with hundreds of other Jewish leaders from across the country, to Washington D.C. to gather in the “People’s House” to celebrate the conclusion of Chanukah.   My good friend and congregant, Janice Kamenir Reznik, an inspiring leader and founder of Jewish World Watch, invited me along to experience this momentous occasion because of my work inside and out of Valley Beth Shalom pushing for social change.  Standing at the entrance to Southern Gate I gazed back along the long line including rabbis, activists, scholars and philanthropists. I couldn’t help but reflect that President Obama would the second amazing leader I would meet that evening.  I should start with the first.

Just an hour before I entered the White House I was sitting in a tent on the National Mall with a group of Latino activists who are fasting for many days to inspire our nation to reform immigration law.   I came with Karla Van Praag, the Executive Director of JOIN for Justice, a prominent Jewish organization that trains leaders for social change. We met with the leader of the fast, an inspiring man named Eddie Carmona.  He grew up in California’s Central Valley and has witnessed, time and again, his own and other families torn apart by U.S. immigration policies. He showed me a shoe found on the border between Arizona and Mexico that belonged to a man who died in the desert trying to make a better life for himself and his family.  Eddie has been fasting since December 1st, and has inspired thousands of others to join him in this effort called Fasting for Families.  

We sat together for a long time, speaking of our faiths (he is Catholic I am Jewish) and the prophetic call to justice.  I spoke with him about fasting in the Jewish tradition, that communal fasts are instituted by the leaders of the community in times of crisis.  He spoke of fasting in terms of piety, a spiritual journey meant to inspire sacred action.  We prayed together and then he graciously gave me and my companion a tour of the tent and the notes of solidarity they have received from around the world.  He brought us to the back part of the tent away from the public where those who have been fasting the longest were sitting, tired and weak.  Eddie told me that he was not on a hunger strike.  He didn’t want to use violent or confrontational language.  For him, this was a public fast, showing that through deep spiritual commitment, he can embody the hunger of the 11 million immigrants who want to become citizens.  He is fasting for his faith, his cousins, and for the millions of others who are hungering for change. When Karla and I left, we embraced and became a little teary.

Eddie Carmona and Rabbi Noah Farkas

Karla and I found a taxi and to our next stop, the White House.  It’s hard to describe the transition from the tent to the palace.  From those who are fasting to those who would be feasting.   Karla and I spoke of the tension between the two, and how we would make the transition.   When we got out of the taxi, we immediately saw friends and jumped in line.  Soon after the gates opened and we snaked our way through security and into the White House itself. 

I was soon schmoozing with others, wine in-hand amongst the portraits of Presidents and First Ladies.  Around 8:00 PM, President Obama and First Lady Michelle emerged in the Center Hall to welcome guests and light the Hanukiah.  My friend, Chaplain Josh Sherwin, led us in the blessings, and two Holocaust survivors lit the candles.   Spontaneously, the crowd started singing Ma’Oztur together.  Supreme Court Justices sang, members of Congress sang, rabbis sang, entertainers sang in a moment of true community that cut across generations and religious beliefs.  To sing Ma O’tzur in the White House is particularly moving because the song is an anthem of defiance by our people, written during the period of the Crusades when the nations turned on us and wished to see our people undone.  To sing that anthem in the greatest hall of power in the world was very moving.  Other nations have fallen and we are still here.

Finally the time came for President Obama to walk the rope line.  I found myself toward the front pressed closely to the other guests with the anticipation of meeting the President.  What should I say?  How should I act?  This was one of the greatest moments of my life, and I stood there unsure.  As he came over to me and I extended my hand and greeted his I found the words.  I said, “Mr. President, I came from the National Mall where those families are fasting.  Keep working for them, and they’ll keep working for you.”  He smiled and gave me a thumbs -up.  That was it, maybe a total of five seconds. 

Sweating, I took a breath and just realized that so much of why I chose this life came together in that one instant.   From the sacred tent of fasters to the “People’s House” from Mr. Carmona to Mr. Obama, I felt the quicksilver of the prophetic impulse coursing through me.  I said a quiet prayer and stepped away from the huddled mass.

In one night, I met two powerful leaders.  One who is the leader of the free world, whose power derives from having won election and his ability now to wield the executive pen, and to speak from the pulpit of the presidency.  The other is the leader of a movement for change, a prophet, whose power comes from his faith and his sense of vocation, a compass of righteous indignation.  When I met Mr. Obama I felt privileged for having been invited, when I met Eddie I felt blessed to be in a sacred space.


Noah Zvi Farkas is a rabbi at Valley Beth Shalom in Encino, CA and co-founder of Netiya.

Eddie Carmona, Barack Obama, and Me Read More »

Thin God’s image

Scrolling down the Pinterest page, I see countless photos of bikini clad girls with emaciated bodies. Mirror selfies tagged as ‘thinspiration’ showcase razor-sharp hipbones, protruding ribs, and skeletal thighs set several inches apart.  The blogger’s comments? “Thigh gap and flat stomach…this is what I want,” and, “I will look like this by summer.”

While the Internet has seen many fads that aim to set the standard of beauty for girls and women, the “thigh gap” trend is one of the most destructive and disturbing to date. The goal is to have legs so thin that your thighs don’t touch, even when standing with your feet together.

In reality, this goal is nearly impossible to achieve without a certain body type. Unless a girl has naturally slender legs and wide-set hips, she would have to go to far and often dangerous lengths for a space between her thighs.

It has come to the point where if you type in “thigh gap” on Pinterest, the top of the screen reads  “Eating disorders are not lifestyle choices, they are mental disorders that if left untreated can cause  serious health problems or could even be life-threatening,” followed by the number for the National  Eating Disorders Association Helpline.

Yet, bloggers from all over the world continue to use social media sites like Pinterest, Tumblr, and Instagram to post workout tips, phrases that promote eating less, and photos of girls with the coveted thigh gap as inspiration for their weight loss goals. Pictures of models, celebrities, and —  wait for it — Holocaust victims are among the images featured on the site for “motivational purposes.”

Although the thigh gap trend is horrifying and tragic in the eyes of any human being, as a Jewish teenager I feel that it strikes an even deeper chord. Throughout my life, I have been taught that everyone is created in God’s image. While this can be interpreted in an infinite number of ways, at its core it means that we should embrace people’s differences and accept that we are all equally beautiful in our own right. This includes body shape, skin color, special needs and everything in between.

I remember reading a Mishnah passage in my ninth grade Jewish Studies class: “A person mints many coins from the same mold and they all resemble one another. But [God] forms each person in the image of Adam and not one of them resembles his fellow” (Sanhedrin 4:5).

It pains me to know that so many girls are striving to alter their bodies’ natural forms to resemble the runway models on the Pinterest page. So many girls are giving in to the pressure to eat less so the space between their thighs will be as wide as the photo reposted on the Tumblr blog tells them it needs to be. And so many are sitting back and watching as teenagers all over the world damage their physical and emotional health trying to match the coins minted from the Instagram mold.

One thing that can’t be stressed enough is that beauty is not something that can be defined — not by Tumblr, not by magazines, and not by the girl who complains about needing to lose five pounds. Many bloggers are taking this idea to heart and creating anti-thigh gap pages to combat negative body image. Blogs like The Beauty of Curve are becoming increasingly popular, and with them the phrase, “No Thigh Gap, No Problem.” The pages feature images of real, healthy women and celebrities with a wide range of body types, supporting the idea that there is beauty in diversity — beauty that God would want us to recognize.

Curvy, thin, tall, short or something in between, every body type is a reflection of God’s beauty and perfection — whatever your interpretation of that may be. There is one thing, however, that I think we can all agree on: up in heaven or wherever She may be, God is probably not trying for a thigh gap.

This article is reprinted from The Roar, a publication of the Milken Student Press

Thin God’s image Read More »