fbpx

September 28, 2011

Fighting to preserve Obamacare

I broke a bone in my foot several weeks ago, and I’ve been limping around in an expensive, ugly boot and shlepping to doctors ever since. A simple slip costs lots of money — happily, not entirely to me. I have health insurance; I’m lucky.

How lucky was especially clear a couple of Sundays ago, when I attended a OneLA Healthcare Summit at Temple Beth Am. On a gorgeous afternoon, some 200 members of more than 20 synagogues, churches and other organizations ignored the lure of weekend fun to gather at Beth Am to do their part in the continuing health care debate that is going on at both a state and federal level. OneLA, a community organizing nonprofit, counts among its member organizations Temple Emanuel of Beverly Hills, Temple Judea, Temple Isaiah, Temple Israel of Hollywood and Beth Am. Also present were just as many congregants from St. Agnes Church, Precious Blood, St. Paul the Apostle, Transfiguration Church and more. It was a true coalition of various faiths, socioeconomic groups and ethnicities.

If you ever wanted to see a group hug of all Los Angeles, you should have been there.

And they weren’t just talking. They were listening: California Assemblyman Mike Feuer came to speak of his efforts to get immediate regulation in California of the health care industry through a bill known as AB 52. Herb Schultz, regional director for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, spoke about work to implement the new federal health insurance exchange, which will be in place by 2014 according to federal law. And California State Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones talked about the state’s need to get control of costs in the health insurance industry.

It can be confusing. Exchanges, assembly bills, regulation. And how about that rant we keep hearing, that “Obamacare is job killing.”

At the conference, four small-business owners from very different walks of life told their stories. Temple Israel member Marilyn Szatmary, who runs a talent agency and for 18 years has always offered her employees health insurance, told of crippling effects of the rising costs of medical coverage, making it impossible for her to expand her business. She described one employee diagnosed with an autoimmune disease who has to spend half her time on the phone dealing with her insurance. “You don’t find out what a policy covers until you get sick,” Szatmary said.

Ronny Bensimon of Beth Am downsized his furniture company during the recession, in part because of the cost of providing insurance: “We have switched to more limited plans and asked employees to contribute more,” he said. Mayra Alvarado of St. Agnes Church runs a child-care center with her husband and three employees. She cannot offer any insurance at all. Her employees go to Tijuana and pay cash for medical care. There were more stories like this, of employers choosing between insurance and hiring staff. Mary Rosenberg, a physical therapist, reduced her practice from three full-time and one half-time physical therapists to just two, and she gets it from both ends — insurance companies that have reduced reimbursement to below the level of 1991, she said, even as she faces rising costs to insure her employees. Yet, she said, “I won’t practice in a setting where I can’t offer quality medical care.”

Who’s killing jobs?

AB 52 “strengthens and expands upon existing federal and state laws for health insurance rate review,” according to the literature handed out at the meeting. Remember last year, for example, when Anthem Blue Cross tried, but failed when faced with public outcry, to raise rates as much as 39 percent for people with individual policies? That kind of move would be regulated by AB 52. In California, we already regulate homeowners insurance, auto insurance and even medical malpractice, Commissioner Jones pointed out. So why not health insurance?

I sat next to Rabbi Laura Geller, senior rabbi at Temple Emanuel, who has been a leader among synagogues in the OneLA efforts. She turned to me during the meeting and said, “These issues concern our congregants, but they also concern the synagogue itself. We are a small business insuring our employees, too.”

So, if you’re convinced, as I am, that this is one of the key issues of our time, what can you do?

Here’s where OneLA comes in — you, too, can join in. Community organizing allows individual voices, joined together, to make up a nucleus. Then many such nuclei, all focused on one or more shared issue, mobilize and raise their voices together to speak louder to government representatives. It’s not about rallying in the streets, though that can happen, too. It’s about the hard, incremental work of participating in the process. Perhaps your synagogue is already a part of this effort. Then you can join. And if it’s not, then now — as you make your resolutions for the coming year —is the time to get your community involved.

Here’s the result of the meeting I attended:

• Rabbi Geller of Temple Emanuel and Rabbi Susan Leider of Beth Am will co-host a health care Shabbaton in spring 2012.
• Around that time, St. Agnes Church will hold a Sunday summit, as well.
• Meanwhile, members of OneLA will conduct working meetings with Schultz on the federal exchange, with Jones on the state level, and with Feuer to figure out how to help with passage of AB 52. Right now AB 52 has passed on the California Assembly floor, passed the State Senate appropriations committee, but is stalled in the Senate because it needs seven more votes.
• In addition, Temple Judea in Tarzana will be convening a meeting similar to Beth Am’s on Nov 13.

I spoke with Leider a few days after the meeting to understand better how, as a rabbi at this busy time of preparing for the High Holy Days, she found time to do this work as well. She said that since she started in this arena in 2008, “It has transformed my rabbinate.” She told me of getting out “from behind the computer and out into the community,” and that in talking to her congregants she now knows more than ever to ask, “What’s keeping you up at night?”

“When you spend time getting to know each other,” Leider explained, “you figure out where the self-interest is.” And that’s the point of all this. Affordable health care is not someone else’s issue, it’s ours. If our employers can’t afford to pay for the rising cost of health insurance, how can we?

Leider told me a story, which she heard at one of the first training sessions she attended for this work: A group of people see baskets of babies floating down a river, and they are horrified, so they grab each baby and nurture and raise it as if it were their own. (Moses, perhaps?) Still, the babies keep coming. So, one day someone says, “While you take care of these babies, I’m going up the river to see why this is happening and try to solve that problem.”

And that’s what these hundreds of people involved with OneLA are doing now. They’re walking up the river to work on the source of the problem. So the babies will be able to stay with their mothers. So we can all afford to go to doctors. So we won’t be staying up so many nights worrying.

Shanah tovah. May this be a year of good health and caring and affordable health care when you need it.

Fighting to preserve Obamacare Read More »

Avoid zero-sum thinking

The journalist Robert Wright argues in his book “Nonzero” that communication, cooperation and trust increase the likelihood that humans can avoid that favored term of game theorists: the zero-sum game. Whereas greater complexity and nuance allow us to avoid the zero-sum trap, the more simplistic and insular we are, the more likely we are to fall into it.

One was reminded of this lesson when observing two events last week, one local and one global in scope: the conviction of 10 students from UC Irvine (UCI) for disrupting a speech by Israel Ambassador Michael Oren, and the Palestinian bid for statehood at the United Nations.

In the first instance, members of UCI’s Muslim Student Union (MSU) undertook, in premeditated fashion, to shout down Oren at his appearance at UCI on Feb. 8, 2010. The disruption was obnoxious and at odds with the spirit of civil discourse that we try to foster on university campuses. In response, the UCI administration sanctioned the students and suspended the MSU for an academic quarter. Inexplicably, Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckus decided to pursue criminal charges against the students, as if there weren’t more important crimes to prosecute in Orange County. After the verdict was announced on Sept. 23, Rackauckus declared in rather hyperbolic fashion that “we will not tolerate a small band of people who want to hijack our freedoms.”

Sadly, some in the Jewish community regard this verdict as a triumph. Shalom Elcott, the president and CEO of the Jewish Federation & Family Services, Orange County, declared after the convictions: “While we accept the right and requirement of a public institution to provide an unfettered forum for diverse points of view, we do not, nor will we ever, support ‘hate speech.’ ” Hate speech is notoriously difficult to define, though there is a long tradition in American law of adopting a wide and tolerant view of First Amendment rights to free speech. A good, if painful, reminder of this tradition came in the recent 8-1 Supreme Court decision permitting the hateful language used by members of the Westboro Baptist Church, often at funerals of U.S. military personnel. If the speech of the Westboro members, odious as it is, is permitted, then it seems hard to argue that the words of the MSU students protesting the Israel ambassador, annoying as they may have been, should be criminalized.

What is particularly unfortunate is the sense that there is a strong Jewish interest in prosecuting this case. We should be clear: The subtext animating this interest is the desire to lend support to the cause of Israel on college campuses. In the name of defending free speech, Jewish advocates of prosecution of the Irvine students are in fact serving to chill open expression of diverse, if unappealing, views on Israel. But this is not a Jewish interest at all. Support for Israel does not and cannot rest on stifling such competing views. Nor does it require pitting Jewish interests against Muslim interests. On the contrary, American Jews and Muslims, despite differences between them over Israel, have much that joins them. Both are members of minority groups for whom the defense of free speech is an essential fortification of the foundations of democratic society. The costs of tolerance may seem high in the short term, but they are a necessary investment in freedom in the long run. This point was made with considerable clarity in 1979, in the midst of a very troubling situation, when neo-Nazis attempted to march in the streets of Skokie, Ill., home to a large number of Holocaust survivors. The executive director of the ACLU at the time, Aryeh Neier, who lost family in the Holocaust, wisely opined: “Keeping a few Nazis off the streets of Skokie will serve Jews poorly if it means that the freedoms to speak, publish or assemble any place in the United States are thereby weakened.”

Just as we should not see the criminalization of free speech in Irvine as a Jewish victory, so too we should not regard American opposition to the Palestinian statehood bid at the United Nations as a win. In the latter case, Jews who dwell within the bubble of organized communal life tended to regard President Obama’s speech last week — in which he called for direct negotiations in lieu of a U.N. bid — as a clear affirmation of support for Israel. It hardly can be denied that direct negotiations are the ideal way to solve the conflict. But they are not currently possible. The Palestinians negotiated with successive Israeli governments for nearly 20 years and are no closer to a state than before. The current Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has no intention, it seems, of uprooting settlements to make way for a territorially viable Palestinian state. And so, the Palestinians have adopted a nonviolent, diplomatic tack intended to push the hand of Israel and the United States. It is a bold gambit and one that may well fail. But after 63 years of statelessness, a condition to which Israel, neighboring Arab states and the international community all have contributed, it is understandable. The time has come to accord Palestinians self-determination. It is right, and it is just. And it is the only way to assure the long-term existence of Israel as a Jewish state. For without a division of the land between two states, the future holds only a single state.

Jews, of all people, should recognize this. Instead, we find ourselves mired in zero-sum thinking that measures our success by the failure of others. Regrettably, it also places us against the tide of both history and justice.

Avoid zero-sum thinking Read More »

How to Make Gribenes[VIDEO]

Okay, I don’t know if it’s a craze exactly, but The New York Times reported this week that fried chicken skin is showing up on menus across America, from Mexican food trucks to retro Jewish haunts to swank West Village eateries.

Foodaism has been evangelizing the Jewish take on fried chicken skin for years.  Here’s what I wrote back in January 2010.  Below it is a video of me making gribenes and enjoying the ideal chicken skin dish: Gribenes Shooters.  Hot crackly greasy chicken skin, and ice cold vodka. 

Whatever happened to gribenes?

I still make them every time I roast a chicken or make chicken soup; couldn’t be more simple.

Gribenes are the golden brown, curled up bits of chicken skin made by rendering the fat, or schmaltz. They are the Jewish equivalent of pork cracklings. The French and Chinese make them from duck. A good gribene is both dry and fatty, crispy and chewy. The word in Yiddish means “scrap.” It’s much better than it sounds.

I make them at home every time I roast a chicken or make chicken soup. I serve them tossed about in a small bowl with onions fried just as crisp in the same schmaltz. Sometimes I toss them in a green salad, the way the French do with theirs. And once in a while I set them on a plate beside thin shot glasses of frozen vodka. These I call Gribenes Shooters.

Outside my kitchen, I don’t come across gribenes.

I know in New York City, the Second Avenue Deli will put a little dish of them on your table when you sit down. Sammy’s Roumanian off Delancy Street does the same, along with a saucer of chicken fat to spread on your rye bread.

But gribenes in a restaurant or deli relegates them to nostalgia, which is a big mistake. Gribenes deserve a place in the home. They taste good. They make good use of excess skin and fat that you’d otherwise toss. And, most importantly, they make people happy.

For some, gribenes instantly recall grandparents. It was my mother’s mother, Bertha Vogel, who taught me to make them. She made and served them whenever she made Friday night dinner. She ate fried chicken skin every week and drank a glass of bourbon every evening. She died in her sleep at age 96.

But even people without a gribenes-eating Jewish grandparent get a kick out of them. They hint at newly hip animal parts like trotters, head cheese and jowls, yet are hardly exotic: people who eat chicken tend to like the crunchy skin the best, anyway. Gribenes just distill that pleasure to its bite-sized essence. I have yet to put out a plate to anything but smiles. Gribenes make people inevitably, assuredly happy. Is that why we’ve stopped eating them?

More likely, gribenes fell out of fashion because of health concerns. In the age of Lipitor and white meat, deliberately tossing back fried chicken skin may seem like the equivalent of a death wish. A friend of mine calls gribenes “chicken crack” — both addictive and dangerous.

My answer is: don’t eat too much. Save them for Shabbat, a special meal; they’re not movie popcorn (which, by the way, is no health picnic either).

Meanwhile, I choose to believe that something that brings people such momentary joy and pleasure cannot do much harm. Especially when chased by a shot of vodka.

Gribenes and Onions

There’s no point in going into proportions here. When you trim a chicken before roasting or stewing, save the excess skin and fat. Two roasting chickens will give you enough for a small dish of gribenes. Plan accordingly.

Chicken with fat attached

Onions, halved and sliced thin

Salt

Cut large pieces of skin into smaller pieces, around 1 or 2 inches.

Heat a skillet and add all the chicken skin and fat. Cook over low to moderate heat until the fat is rendered from the skin and the skin begins to turn golden brown.

Toward the end of the cooking, turn down the heat to avoid burning and watch carefully. When the bits of skin are the color of an autumn leaf, remove from the pan with a slotted spoon and place on a paper towel to drain.

Add enough thinly sliced onion to cover bottom of pan but still stay submerged in the schmaltz. Fry over moderate heat until very crispy and brown. Drain separately on paper towels.

Just before serving, toss gribenes with onion in a small dish, sprinkle with salt, and serve.

How to Make Gribenes [VIDEO]

http://www.jewishjournal.com/foodaism/item/the_joy_of_skin_video_20100126/

How to Make Gribenes[VIDEO] Read More »

How close is Iran to the bomb?

Either Iran could build a nuclear bomb in a matter of months or it is unlikely to get such a weapon any time soon—depending on which Western expert you talk to.

The differing estimates show the difficulty in trying to assess how long it could take Iran to convert its growing uranium stockpile into weapons-grade material and how advanced it may be in other areas vital for any bomb bid.

The answers to those questions could determine the major powers’ room for maneuver in trying to find a diplomatic solution to a dispute over Iran’s nuclear ambitions which has the potential to spark a wider conflict in the Middle East.

Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. Western-based analysts generally agree with their governments that Tehran is developing technology that could be used to make a bomb, but they disagree about just how close it is to success.

U.S. defense analyst Greg Jones gave one of the more urgent warnings this month, arguing that if Iran decides to make a bomb it could produce enough highly-enriched uranium (HEU) in about eight weeks.

“The timeframe will shrink to only about four weeks by the end of next year as Iran’s enriched uranium stockpiles and enrichment capacity continue to increase,” Jones, of the conservative Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, said.

Iran “needs to be treated as a de facto nuclear power simply by virtue of being so close to having a weapon,” he added in an article in U.S. political magazine New Republic.

Other experts say such estimates are unrealistic, given the hurdles Iran must still overcome.

“I think that we tend to overstate sometimes how close Iran is to being able to develop a nuclear weapon,” said senior researcher Shannon Kile at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, a think-tank based in the Swedish capital.

“I just don’t see how you can credibly say they are going to be eight weeks away or even 18 months away.”

Jones is not the only expert to suggest that Iran may be very close to producing the refined uranium material necessary for a weapon, should it decide to do so.

A paper published by the U.S. Bipartisan Policy Center think-tank said Iran could make 20 kg of HEU—a quantity it said would be enough for one device—in two months.

It said it remained unclear if Iran had mastered the technology to turn the HEU into a weapon, but that history suggested this could be achieved in less than six months.

But another Washington-based think-tank, the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), said Jones’s calculation method was “unreliable” and a breakout in such a short time at Iran’s Natanz enrichment site was not realistic.

Other experts stressed that Iran would also need to turn any weapons-usable uranium into the core of a nuclear missile if it wanted more than a crude device, adding to the timetable.

Mark Fitzpatrick, of the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), said he now believed Iran could make a nuclear weapon in less than two years’ time.

“Suggestions that Iran will be able to produce weapons in a matter of months are irresponsible,” Fitzpatrick, a director of the IISS Non-proliferation and Disarmament Programme, said.

But, “just as exaggeration is irresponsible, so too is complacency,” he added.

Iran’s refusal to halt its enrichment activities has drawn four rounds of U.N. sanctions since 2006.

Refined uranium can be used to fuel nuclear power plants or provide material for bombs if processed much further.

The West fears that Iran’s move last year to enrich uranium to a fissile purity of almost 20 percent—up from the 3.5 percent normally needed for reactors—takes it significantly closer to the 90 percent level needed for arms.

Iran says it needs this higher-grade material for a reactor producing radioactive isotopes to treat cancer patients.

ISIS said that in the fastest scenario, Iran could have enough of the 20 percent material for a nuclear weapon in 2012 if it refined more.

But even if Iran were to produce bomb-grade uranium, it would also have to transform it from gaseous into metal form, miniaturize it to squeeze into the nose cone of a missile and fit it with a trigger system.

Sanctions and possible sabotage—such as the Stuxnet computer virus and killings of nuclear scientists that Tehran blames on Israel—may have slowed Iran’s atomic work, but its stockpile of uranium is steadily growing.

Iran “is moving ahead in all of the ways that you would need to if you wanted a nuclear weapon,” Fitzpatrick said.

Raising the pressure, U.N. nuclear watchdog chief Yukiya Amano this month said he was “increasingly concerned” about possible work in Iran to develop a nuclear missile. He hoped to give more details soon about the basis for those concerns.

Israel and the United States, Tehran’s arch foes, have not ruled out military action if diplomacy fails to resolve the row. Israel bombed an Iraqi reactor in 1981 and launched a similar sortie against Syria in 2007.

“Israel has no doubt that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons,” the head of the Jewish state’s atomic energy commission, Shaul Chorev, told member states of the U.N. nuclear agency last week.

Israel’s chief of military intelligence, Aviv Kochavi, said in January that Iran could produce bombs within two years.

Iran and Arab states say Israel itself has an atomic arsenal that threatens regional peace and stability. Israel neither confirms nor denies that it possesses nuclear arms.

Diplomatic efforts to seek a negotiated outcome with Iran have been deadlocked since a fruitless meeting in January.

Tehran now says it is prepared to resume the talks. Western countries are skeptical, but the six powers involved—the United States, China, Russia, France, Britain and Germany—may once again test its readiness to engage on issues of substance.

They have offered economic and political incentives for Iran to drop enrichment, so far in vain. Iran’s says it is its “inalienable right” to develop the nuclear fuel cycle.

Greg Thielmann, a senior fellow at the U.S.-based Arms Control Association, stressed the importance of using the time available to influence decision-making in Tehran: “A nuclear-armed Iran is neither imminent nor inevitable.”

How close is Iran to the bomb? Read More »

Israeli senior ministers disagree on Quartet proposal

Israel’s senior Cabinet ministers failed to reach an agreement on accepting a Mideast Quartet proposal to renew peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

The ministers met until the wee hours Wednesday but could not agree on accepting an initiative that is believed to have the backing of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The proposal calls for a renewal of direct talks within a month, without preconditions, and to reach a final agreement by the end of 2012. It does not specifically mention settlement building, but calls on Israel and the Palestinians to “refrain from provocative actions.”

The Palestinians have not responded, but have expressed disappointment with the proposal because it does not call for a settlement construction freeze or for starting negotiations with the 1967 borders as a guide.

The proposal is an attempt to get the sides back to peace negotiations before the United Nations Security Council votes on a Palestinian statehood bid submitted to the Security Council last week.

Israeli senior ministers disagree on Quartet proposal Read More »

Our Government Is A Big Fat Waste-Monger

I would like to suggest a new cabinet post: Secretary of Frugality. Please note that I am available for the job. Here are a few items I would deal with.

• I volunteered to be a polls worker on Election Day, and was obliged to take a. two-hour training class.  We were each handed three thick vinyl-covered volumes of instructions.  My particular job description took up half a page.  I wonder what amount of trees and water and oil were wasted in order to print thousands of those useless instruction books. 

• Actors collect unemployment between jobs.  While I was on the dole, I would frequently receive letters from the Unemployment Department inviting me to learn job skills as a metalworker.  I wonder how many thousands of these notices were sent out.  I wonder how much paper, energy, and manpower was wasted. I wonder how many actors seek training as metalworkers.

• I will permanently abolish the automatic flush toilet: a truly diabolical invention. The airport restroom sounds like Niagara Falls.  The automatic gizmo is so sensitive that it flushes when you look at it, flushes when you sit down, flushes while you do your business, and it flushes again to say bye-bye.  I may be technologically challenged, but I am perfectly capable of pulling a toilet handle.  I wonder how many millions of gallons of precious water are squandered away by a totally unnecessary “convenience.”  Why don’t they invent something useful instead, like an electronic eyeglass locater?

• Our primitive, brutal, congested penal system has got to be one of the biggest money-wasters around – along with that insane War on Drugs.  I say make more drugs legal – in addition to alcohol and nicotine – then tax the hell out of them and use that money to educate and empower those young men who are looking to escape their hopeless lives.  They will then get good jobs, nice homes, and get high on things that we respectable people are addicted to – like crispy baguettes and “Thirty Rock.”  It’s so simple!

When I am Secretary of Frugality, I promise to
• turn garbage into mulch,
• turn bath water into garden water,
• turn cooking oil into fuel,
• and let those windmills turn.

CAUTIOUS OPTIMISM
I believe Americans are capable of change, and there are small signs of progress.  I attended a school concert recently, and the programs were printed on scrap paper.

HOPE SPRINGS ETERNAL!

Our Government Is A Big Fat Waste-Monger Read More »

German seminary honors anti-apartheid activist

Germany’s Progressive Jewish seminary has given its highest honor to a former anti-apartheid activist with roots in Berlin.

Helen Zille, the prime minister of South Africa’s Western Cape Province, received the annual Abraham Geiger Prize from the Potsdam-based Abraham Geiger College in ceremonies Monday at the Berlin headquarters of the state of Bavaria. Zille also heads the Democratic Alliance Party and is a former mayor of Cape Town.

The award came just as the college signed a new deal with the University of Potsdam, making rabbinical studies a part of the university’s philosophy department.

Zille, 60, grand-niece of the famous German artist and political caricaturist Heinrich Zille (1858-1929), was honored for the “courage and commitment with which she has fought for a democratic South Africa.” Zille said she considered the prize “a great honor and an encouragement to keep on going. Social commitment runs in the family.”

Reportedly, Zille plans to dedicate the more than $13,000 prize to a scholarship fund for students from South Africa who are accepted into the Geiger College rabbinical program. The first rabbis were ordained there in 2001.

Among the guests at Monday’s ceremony was U.S. Rabbi Stephen Lewis Fuchs, president of the World Union for Progressive Judaism, who was to meet with top German political leaders during his stay. Fuchs’ family came from Leipzig.

During her stay in Berlin, Zille visited the grave of her paternal great-uncle for the first time. Heinrich Zille, who was not Jewish, was known for calling attention to the plight of underprivileged, poor and handicapped people in his drawings. Helen Zille’s parents, who both had Jewish roots, fled Nazi Germany in the 1930s and settled in South Africa.

As a journalist in the 1970s, Zille investigated the 1977 death in police custody of student leader Steve Biko, founder of the Black Consciousness movement.

Also Monday, the University of Potsdam, seat of the Geiger College, renewed its 10-year-old contract with the rabbinical seminary, declaring its intentions to create a Department for Rabbinical Studies within the university’s philosophy faculty.

The ceremonial event was hosted by Horst Seehofer, governor of the state of Bavaria, who delivered the laudatio for Zille. The annual prize, named after one of the founders of liberal Judaism, honors those who have contributed to promoting pluralism.

German seminary honors anti-apartheid activist Read More »

Israeli man, son were terror victims, Defense Ministry says

An Israeli man and his infant son killed when their car crashed on a West Bank road were victims of a terror attack, Israel’s Defense Ministry said.

The ministry made the announcement Wednesday after receiving the results of a police investigation into the incident.

The Sept. 23 crash near the Jewish settlement of Kiryat Arba occurred after a thrown rock crashed through the windshield of the car; investigators found a large blood-stained rock in the overturned car. Blood samples from the rock and the driver were compared.

The Israeli military and police had said originally that the crash, which killed Asher Palmer, 25, and his infant son, Yonatan, was an accident.

Israeli man, son were terror victims, Defense Ministry says Read More »

BMW family admits using slave labor for Nazis

The family that owns BMW has admitted to using slave labor during World War II.

Some 50,000 forced laborers are estimated to have worked in the factories of industrialist Guenther Quandt producing arms for the Nazis, according to a study commissioned by the Quandt family.

Gabriele Quandt, grandson of Guenther Quandt, told the German newspaper Die Zeit that it was “wrong” for the family to ignore this chapter of its history.

The independent study by the Bonn-based historian Joachim Scholtyseck concluded that Guenther Quandt and his son Herbert helped bolster the Nazis, according to the newspaper. The three-year study was commissioned in response to public outrage over a German television documentary that made the accusation; the documentary had access to the company’s files from the Third Reich period.

Guenther Quandt also is accused of taking over Jewish-owned companies during the war with the blessing of the Nazis.

The Quandt family bought shares of BMW 15 years after World War II.

Guenther Quandt became a Nazi Party member on May 1, 1933. He died in 1954.

The family still owns a majority of shares in the luxury carmaker.

BMW family admits using slave labor for Nazis Read More »