fbpx

March 14, 2011

Brandeis Hillel excludes a controversial group on Israel, generating debate

Hillel may be the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life, but that doesn’t mean every Jewish student group is welcome.

Last week, Brandeis University’s Hillel voted not to accept the membership bid of the local campus chapter of Jewish Voice for Peace, an organization that has been criticized for its support of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign targeting Israel and was listed by the Anti-Defamation League last October as among the top 10 anti-Israel groups in the United States.

“While we understand that JVP at Brandeis considers itself a pro-Israel club, based on positions and programming JVP has sponsored, we do not believe that JVP can be included under Hillel’s umbrella,” Brandeis senior Andrea Wexler, the president of the 11-member Hillel student executive board that rejected the application of Jewish Voice for Peace, wrote in a letter explaining the board’s decision.

Wexler said the group’s words and actions put it beyond what is acceptable to Hillel.

Fellow Brandeis senior Lev Hirschhorn, who presented JVP’s case to the Hillel board, said Hillel should not exclude any Jewish student group.

“As members of the Brandeis Jewish community, we wanted Jewish Voice for Peace to be included at the Jewish communal table,” he said.

The battle at Brandeis over JVP is part of the growing, heated debate in the American Jewish community over what constitutes acceptable criticism of Israel.

Last summer, a furor erupted in San Francisco over Jewish federation funding for a Jewish film festival that screened a film about pro-Palestinian activist Rachel Corrie. For the past three years, the “pro-Israel, pro-peace” lobbying group J Street has stirred passions on both sides of the divide for its calls for increased U.S. pressure on Israel to deal with the Palestinians. This month, Israel’s Knesset decided to investigate J Street.

At Brandeis, the organization’s college chapter, called J Street U, blasted Hillel’s decision on Jewish Voice for Peace.

“While J Street U and JVP strongly disagree about many issues related to the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including the BDS movement, we nonetheless believe that they should be a part of the Jewish communal conversation,” J Street U said, using the acronym for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign.

Unlike J Street, Jewish Voice for Peace does not describe itself as pro-Israel. That and JVP’s support for the BDS movement were critical to Hillel’s decision, Wexler said. The decision, she added, was “very difficult” and not unanimous.

“According to the pro-Israel guidelines given to us, which we support and agree with, we didn’t feel they fit into what we consider a Hillel member group,” Wexler said of JVP.

The membership guidelines to which Wexler referred were released by Hillel’s international body last December. The guidelines reiterate Hillel’s support for Israel as a “Jewish and democratic state,” and say Hillel “will not partner with, house or host” groups or speakers that do not agree with that statement, including those that support the BDS campaign.

Hirschhorn says the Brandeis chapter of JVP only supports boycotting goods produced in Gaza and the West Bank, not Israel proper, so it should not be considered anti-Israel.

“We know what the national guidelines say, but we also know Brandeis is an open, welcoming community,” he said.

Wexler said the campus JVP chapter cannot be considered apart from positions taken by its national organization, which held its national membership conference over the weekend in Philadelphia.

Wayne Firestone, Hillel’s president and the main author of the new membership guidelines, says that any organization, including Hillel, has the right to define its limits.

“We do not feel we can be true to our values and partner with groups that deny Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state,” he said.

Firestone noted that the guidelines also would exclude right-wing student organizations that do not support Israel as a democratic state, although no such groups have applied to Hillel since the regulations were put in place.

The Brandeis chapter of Jewish Voice for Peace, which was created last fall, was the first JVP chapter nationwide to apply for Hillel membership. The organization, which began in the San Francisco area, also has chapters at the University of California, San Diego, the University of Arizona, St. Lawrence University and Earlham College in Richmond, Ind. It is organizing on six more campuses, according to a spokesperson.

Adam Lerner, a sophomore at Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., where JVP is organizing, says Hillel, which has the stated goal of providing a safe space for students to explore their Jewish identity, should not set a political litmus test for who is in and who is out.

“If Hillel promotes itself as ‘the’ center for Jewish life on campus, they need to have as pluralistic a voice as possible,” Lerner said. “If Israel is open to all Jews, then Hillel should be open to all Jewish groups on campus. They should take the model they’re promoting for the Jewish state and apply it to themselves.”

Jonathan Horovitz, a sophomore at the University of California, Berkeley, says the issue isn’t Hillel banning a particular opinion but choosing not to partner with an organization that is disruptive and uncivil. He noted that JVP supporters have heckled pro-Israel speakers, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and the group aligns with organizations such as Students for Justice in Palestine and the International Solidarity Movement.

“The actions of JVP and their guests abuse the openness offered by the mainstream Jewish community by responding with hostility,” Horovitz said. “A group that hosts such events and welcomes such disrespectful jeering should not be allowed in the Jewish community.”

Firestone says all students are welcome at Hillel as individuals, no matter their organizational affiliations. But “that’s different from co-sponsoring with an organization that does harm to our central values,” he said.

Ben Sales, editor of New Voices, an online publication serving the American Jewish student community, says this position is disingenuous.

“If Hillel wants to be the Israel advocacy organization on campus that also provides a wealth of other programming for Jewish students, that’s fine,” Sales said, “but then it’s inaccurate to call itself the center for Jewish life while excluding a group of Jewish students who do not support Israel as a Jewish and democratic state but who are not violent or discriminatory, and who ground their positions in Jewish values.”

It turns out the debate about the Brandeis Hillel decision is much more heated off-campus than on it; both Hirschhorn and Wexler say there is no hostility between their groups.

“I study Hebrew with a lot of them,” Hirschhorn said of the Hillel board members. “They made sure we understood this isn’t a personal thing.” Wexler added that after the meeting, several of the students became “friends” with each other on Facebook.

“We encourage these conversations,” said Larry Sternberg, executive director of the Hillel at Brandeis. “This whole thing reflects the fact that there are such conversations taking place. And the fact that JVP wants to be part of Hillel is a good thing.”

Brandeis Hillel excludes a controversial group on Israel, generating debate Read More »

Israel protests screening of film at United Nations

Israel is protesting the screening of a controversial film on the Israel-Palestinian conflict in the main hall of the United Nations General Assembly.

The screening Monday evening will be the U.S. premiere of the film “Miral” by award-winning American-Jewish director Julian Schnabel.

“Miral” is based on the 2004 autobiographical novel by Palestinian journalist Rula Jebreal that traces the Arab-Israeli conflict after 1948 from the perspective of a Palestinian orphan. Jebreal and Schnabel are a couple.

“We find it very troubling that the U.N. has chosen to feature this film in the GA Hall,” Israel’s U.N. delegation said in a letter of complaint sent March 11 to Joseph Deiss, the president of the U.N. General Assembly. “We are not aware of any other films with such contentious political content that have received this kind of endorsement from the President of the GA.”

The showing of the movie, the letter said, “will mark a rare occasion in which the U.N.‘s GA Hall is used for a movie premiere. This is clearly a politicized decision of the U.N., one that shows poor judgment and a lack of evenhandedness.”

A panel discussion with Jebreal and Schnabel attended by representatives of several U.N. delegations is scheduled for after the movie.

American Jewish Committee Executive Director David Harris said in a letter to Deiss that showing such a film in the U.N. General Assembly hall “will only serve to reinforce the already widespread view that Israel simply cannot expect fair treatment in the U.N.”

Harris expressed concern that “the President of the General Assembly would wish to associate himself—and the prestige of his office—with such a blatantly one-sided event.” He urged Deiss to reconsider the decision.

Read more about the controversy at JewishJournal.com/HollywoodJew.

Israel protests screening of film at United Nations Read More »

Yesterday’s terrorist is today’s statesman: Another view of the Itamar murders

Read a counter-point to this article by David Suissa here.

Murdering people in their sleep (if that is what happened to the Fogel family in the Itamar settlement) and butchering children is horrible no matter whose children they are. But the fact remains that the jury is out. The guilty parties have not been brought to justice. To tar and feather the entire Palestinian community with collective responsibility for these attacks is unfair. Let the criminals be brought before a court of law.

In the meantime, if we want to deplore the deaths of innocent civilians, let us also remember that more than 1,000 Palestinians were killed in Gaza, many of them women and children, during the 2008-2009 Israeli attack (13 Israeli soldiers died). Columnist David Suissa spends much time describing Palestinian culture as one that glorifies and martyrs “terrorists,” but he neglects to mention that Menachem Begin was among several early Zionists who terrorized and attacked the British, blowing up the King David Hotel in 1946 (91 people were killed, including innocent civilians). Begin was a member of the Irgun, which later was responsible for the 1948 Deir Yassin Massacre in which over a hundred Palestinians were butchered. Weren’t these the acts of war criminals? None of them were ever brought to justice. What history shows is that the first terrorists in the Holy Land were Jews, not Palestinians.

Suissa seems to have a double standard: Palestinian reverence for those who fight against their oppressors is abject, and Jewish blood is sacred.

One final criticism of his column: regarding the Israeli athletes who were taken hostage by Palestinians at Munich in 1972 and then killed mostly at the airport: the consensus now is that the German police were largely responsible for the carnage. There is no proof that Salah Mesbah Khalaf, also known as Abu Iyad, was the triggerman. In fact, there are too many holes in this column, and when you’re willing to fudge facts to drive a point home, or even make stuff up, it throws into question everything you write.

As a Jew myself, whose Moroccan Jewish aunt was killed in Auschwitz, and whose father and three uncles fought in Palestine in 1947-1948 because they thought it was the right thing to do at the time (they all subsequently regretted the experience and spoke for years of the discrimination they endured at the hands of their Ashkenazi colleagues), I care what Israel does in my name. I feel I have a right to speak for or against Israel because Israel pretends to speak for me as a Jewish person. I want to say, Israel does nothing in my name, and has no right to muddle my Judaism and my people’s history with the history of Zionism and what Israel has done to the Palestinian people. As I’ve written elsewhere, Israel has amends to make. Without doubt, so do the Palestinians. But let us not delude ourselves into thinking we are righteous or better than the Arabs, or less bloodthirsty. We all have blood on our hands. Who will be the first to take responsibility?

Yesterday’s terrorist is today’s statesman: Another view of the Itamar murders Read More »

Jew Are You? [VIDEO]

Jew Are You?

Promo for The Shtibl Minyan (www.shtibl.com)‘s 2011 Purim party.

STARRING: Joel Levinson, Rachel Leah Cohen, Shachar Cohen-Hodos, Deon Cole, Maria Moreno, Rob Kutner

PERFORMER/COMPOSER: Joel Levinson
WRITER/DIRECTOR: Rob Kutner
EDITOR: Michelle Fellner
GRAPHICS: Annette Price
SPECIAL EFFECTS: Vatche Arabian

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
The Cohen-Hodoses
The Singer-Frankeses
Sheryl Zohn
Scott Cronick

APOLOGIES TO:
Roger, Pete, Keith, & John

Jew Are You? [VIDEO] Read More »

Netanyahu: Palestinian public must hear Abbas condemn Itamar attack

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to express to the Palestinian public his condemnation of the deadly attack at a West Bank settlement over the weekend.

In an interview with Israel Radio earlier Monday, Abbas called the stabbing of five members of a family at the settlement of Itamar a despicable, immoral and inhuman act.

“A human being is not capable of something like that,” Abbas told the radio. “Scenes like these – the murder of infants and children and a woman slaughtered – cause any person endowed with humanity to hurt and to cry.”

Read more at Haaretz.com.

Netanyahu: Palestinian public must hear Abbas condemn Itamar attack Read More »

Iran will attend ‘12 Olympics despite ‘revolting’ logo

Iran said it will attend the 2012 Olympics in London despite its protest of the Games’ logo, which it says spells the word Zion.

Bahram Afsharzadeh, the secretary general of Iran’s National Olympic Committee, on Sunday told Iran’s Press-TV that “we will participate and play gloriously in the London games.”

His comments came after British Prime Minister David Cameron told the British community weekly Jewish News over the weekend that Iran is “completely paranoid” over the logo.

“If the Iranians don’t want to come, don’t come; we won’t miss you,” he said. “It would be a crazy reason for not coming.”

Cameron added that the athletes who refuse to compete against Israeli athletes would not be welcome.

The emblem, which features jagged shapes representing the numbers 2012, has been criticized for its design, which organizers say is modern and intended to catch the attention of the younger generation.

Last month, Mohammad Aliabadi, the head of Iran’s National Olympic Committee, accused the British Olympic organizers of “racism” in a letter to International Olympic Committee President Jacques Rogge, the Iranian ILNA news agency reported, according to news agencies.

“The use of the word Zion by the designer of Olympics logo in the emblem of the Olympics Games 2012 is a very revolting act,” Aliabadi wrote, warning that if it was not changed it could “affect the participation of several countries, especially like Iran, which insists on following principles and values.”

The International Olympic Committee rejected the complaint.

Iran will attend ‘12 Olympics despite ‘revolting’ logo Read More »

David Suissa: Behind the Itamar Murders

Read a counter-point to this article by Jordan Elgrably here.

It is fashionable when talking about the “peace process” to focus on hope—to try to nurture the moderate elements among our “peace partners” and constantly inject good faith and good will to keep the process moving “forward.”

Because I crave peace by nature, I’ve always had some sympathy for this approach, which is why I have many friends on the left and why I occasionally take a break from my hard-nosed realism to indulge in more dreamlike and wishful prose.

This is not one of those times.

When I saw the horrifying pictures of the Jewish family members in Itamar who were stabbed to death in their own home— Udi and Ruth Fogel (36 and 35 years old), their children Yoav (11), Elad (4) and Hadas, their 3-month-old daughter— I thought of recent reports on the glorification of terrorism in Palestinian society.

It was impossible not to connect the dots.

In the reports, from Palestinian Media Watch, I learned that Dalal Mughrabi, the terrorist who, in 1978, was responsible for the most lethal attack against Israel, is now immortalized by having the following named for her: two elementary schools, a kindergarten, a computer center, summer camps, football tournaments, a community center, a sports team, a public square, a street, an election course, an adult education course, a university club, a dance troupe, a military unit, a dormitory in a youth center, a TV quiz team and a graduation ceremony.

I also learned that today, a Palestinian child can walk to school along a street named after the terrorist Abu Jihad, who planned a bus hijacking that killed 37, spend the day in a school named after Ahmad Yassin, the man who founded Hamas, play soccer in the afternoon in a tournament honoring terrorist Abd Al-Basset Odeh, who killed 31, and end his day at a youth center named after Abu Iyad, who was responsible for killing 11 Israeli Olympic athletes in Munich.

These are the heroes of Palestinian society—not Abraham Lincolns and Albert Einsteins and Martin Luther Kings, but murderers who crave the spilling of Jewish blood.

Before you rush to defend our “new and improved” Palestinian “peace partners,” note that it was Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas who funded a computer center named after Dalal Mughrabi in 2009, and who supported the naming of the square in her honor in 2010.

“Of course, we want to name a square after her,” he said to Al-Hayat Al-Jadida on Jan.17, 2010.

And who sponsored a sporting event named after one of the most prominent terrorist of all, Abu Jihad, in May 2010? None other than PA Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, the man who is building the “new” Palestine.

Just last year, Mahmoud Al-Aloui, a member of the Fatah Central Committee, said in an interview in Al-Hayat Al Jadida: “It is our right and our duty to take pride in all of the Shahids (martyrs), and it is our duty to convey this message in the most direct manner to the generations to come.”

He wasn’t kidding. Only a month ago, PA President Abbas awarded $2,000 to the family of a terrorist who attacked two Israeli soldiers in December.

And the very day before the Itamar murders, PA presidential advisor Sabri Saidam delivered a speech reported in Al Ayyam, in which he emphasized that “the weapons must be turned towards the main enemy [Israel] and internal differences of opinion must be set aside.”

This glorification of Jew-hatred and murder in the name of martyrdom—which marinates all strata of Palestinian society—is happening under the watchful eyes of our Palestinian “peace partners,” who have convinced most of the world, and many Israel supporters, that the real obstacle to peace is not Palestinian incitement to murder but Jewish building of apartments in East Jerusalem.

Even if you’re a passionate peacenik, you have to admit that this is a joke. What does Jewish construction have to do with a Jew-hatred that has been burned into Arab hearts since before the first settlement or even Israel ever existed?

What else but Jew-hatred can explain the consistent refusal by Palestinian leaders to recognize a Jewish state and prepare their people for the inevitable compromises that peace with Jews will require?

As Sari Nusseibeh once said, “How can we Palestinians expect Israel to think we want co-existence when our position on the refugee issue has been tantamount to a call for Israel’s destruction?”

So, here’s my message to my friends in the peace camp. You’ve done an amazing job of telling the world that a peace agreement with the Palestinians is really, really important, and that Israel is primarily responsible for the absence of this agreement.

In fact, you’ve done such an amazing job of blaming Israel that my friend Gary Rosenblatt, editor of the Jewish Week in New York, wrote last week that Israel has become a “source of embarrassment” for many American Jews. Imagine that.

Well, now you have a chance to make amends and bring some balance to your message.

In honor of the children who were stabbed to death in Itamar, you can release this statement to the world: “It is really, really important, for the sake of peace, that Palestinian leaders eliminate the glorification of terrorism and Jew-hatred that permeates their society, and begin immediately to teach the benefits and compromises of peaceful co-existence with a Jewish state.”

Who’s brave enough in the peace camp to sign their name to that statement?

David Suissa: Behind the Itamar Murders Read More »

The controversy begins: AJC protests Julian Schnabel’s ‘Miral’

What began as a deeply personal project because of his Judaism has become an arsenal of controversy for filmmaker Julian Schnabel and his latest film “Miral”. 

Billed as a story about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict seen through Palestinian eyes, tonight’s scheduled screening at the UN in New York is garnering predictable protestation.

The screening has raised the ire of at least one Jewish group, the American Jewish Committee, who yesterday urged the president of the United Nations General Assembly to cancel the screening-for-diplomats before Miral goes into wide theatrical release March 25.

According to a letter penned by AJC director David Harris and posted on Nikki Finke’s Deadline.com, the group is concerned about how the film will resonate in the highly politicized halls of the UN.

“I write on behalf of the American Jewish Committee (AJC) to express profound concern about the planned showing of the film ‘Miral’,” Harris wrote to UN Assembly President Joseph Deiss.

“The film has a clear political message, which portrays Israel in a highly negative light. Permit me to ask why the President of the General Assembly would wish to associate himself—and the prestige of his office—with such a blatantly one-sided event.”

The film, told through the eyes of two Palestinian women and based on the autobiographical book by Palestinian journalist Rula Jebreal, spans 40 years in Israeli history, from the creation of the state in 1948 to the failed Oslo Accords in 1993. The movie, starring Frieda Pinto (“Slumdog Millionaire”), Willem Dafoe and Vanessa Redgrave, is based on Jebreal’s experience as an orphaned Palestinian girl who grows up amidst the conflict.

The Palestinian perspective was certain to ruffle at least a few feathers, despite being under the auspices of a Jewish director (Schnabel) and distributor (Harvey Weinstein) who both immediately defended the film.

According to Deadline.com’s Mike Fleming, Schnabel said:

“I love the State of Israel. I believe in it, and my film is about preserving it, not hurting it. Understanding is part of the Jewish way and Jewish people are supposed to be good listeners. But, if we don’t listen to the other side, we can never have peace. Instead of saying ‘no,’ I ask the AJC to say, ‘yes,’ see Miral and join the discussion.”

Weinstein said:

“As a Jewish American, I can categorically state that I would not be releasing a film that was flagrantly biased towards Israel or Judaism. Miral tells a story about a young Palestinian woman, but that does not make it a polemic. By stifling discussion or pre-judging a work of art, we only perpetuate the prejudice that does so much harm. When I told my daughters, Lili 16 and Emma,13, about the AJC demand, they said, ‘give Mr. Harris a copy of the Constitution and point out the paragraph about free speech.’ I truly hope the AJC will join us for the premiere of Miral and the discussion that follows.”

Last September, Schnabel told The Guardian he felt a personal responsibility to tell the tale of Palestine.

“Coming from my background, as an American Jewish person whose mother was president of Hadassah [the Women’s Zionist Organisation of America] in 1948, I figured I was a pretty good person to try to tell the story of the other side…I felt it was my responsibility to confront this issue because, maybe, I’ve spent most of my life receding from my responsibility as a Jewish person.”

No doubt that last statement will get Schnabel stamped as “self-hating” when it takes great courage to delve into such complicated, personal subject matter. Nevertheless, the filmmaker hopes the film will spark new—dare I say ‘nuanced’—conversations about the conflict, a dream indicative of his artistic idealism. Maybe when the film hits theaters, because so far, it’s sounding like the same old venomous he said/she said, pro-Israel/anti-Israel, right/left wrangling.

“One of the reasons why I made this film,” Schnabel told an audience at the movie’s Venice Film Festival premiere last Fall, “is that it was so obvious to me that there are more similarities between these people than differences.” 

Watch the trailer:

The controversy begins: AJC protests Julian Schnabel’s ‘Miral’ Read More »

Olmert to be charged in real estate scandal

Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is among 18 people who will be indicted in Israel’s largest real-estate scandal.

The Tel Aviv District’s Prosecutor’s Office announced the indictments on Monday. Among the others indicted are former Olmert chief aide Shula Zaken and ex-Jerusalem Mayor Uri Lupolianski, in the Holyland apartment project affair following a court hearing.

An Israeli police investigation completed last August recommended Olmert’s indictment.

Olmert is suspected of accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes during the construction of the Holyland apartment project in Jerusalem when he was mayor of the Israeli capital and then trade minister.

The Holyland project started while Olmert was mayor of Jerusalem from 1993 to 2003, and continued under his successor, Lupolianski, who served until 2008.

Olmert is under investigation or on trial in several alleged scandals, but has not yet been convicted of a crime.

Olmert to be charged in real estate scandal Read More »

Jewish digital media projects awarded grants

The Jewish New Media Innovation Fund has announced $500,000 in grants to nine digital media projects.

The projects are designed to engage 18- to 40-year-olds in Jewish life, learning culture and community.

The awards announced Monday are the first in the pilot program funded by the Jim Joseph, Righteous Persons, and Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family foundations.

The projects include a digital platform for exploring historical dimensions of Jewish music and culture; an interactive, customizable Haggadah creator; a parenting website targeting the vast spectrum of Jewish families, with local online communities and an interactive Jewish baby name bank; online cartoon videos that teach how to lead Jewish rituals and holidays in the home; and an online community that translates traditional Jewish liturgy into modern language.

Each project will receive one-time funding for one year, as well as mentoring and coaching, and resources for benchmarking and evaluating success.

“Our goal is to support innovative initiatives using new media to engage and deepen Jewish identity,” said Phyllis Cook, a member of the Jim Joseph Foundation board of directors. “It is my hope that some of these projects will surprise us with their effectiveness and that we will learn how to employ this media effectively in touching the next generation.”

The nine finalists were chosen from a pool of more than 300 applications in eight countries and requesting an estimated $18 million. Nearly two-thirds of the applications came from not-for-profit organizations, with the rest submitted by for-profits and individuals.

Jewish digital media projects awarded grants Read More »