fbpx

March 11, 2011

Japan earthquake relief: How you can help

In the aftermath of the devastating earthquake in Japan, the organized Jewish world is lining up support for the rescue and relief effort in the region.

Here are ways you can help:

” title=”American Joint Distribution Committee” target=”_blank”>American Joint Distribution Committee
You may give by mail or phone:
Check payable to JDC, please specify the program name
Attn: JDC
P.O. Box 530
132 East 43rd Street
New York, NY 10017
(212) 687-6200

” title=”Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago” target=”_blank”>Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago


For more information on how you can help visit ” title=”Jewish groups mobilizing response to massive Japan earthquake and tsunami” target=”_blank”>Jewish groups mobilizing response to massive Japan earthquake and tsunami

Jewish organizations are mobilizing their responses to the massive earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan on Friday.

IsraAid, an Israel-based coordinating organization for 17 Israeli and Jewish humanitarian groups, said Friday that it has two teams of rescue personnel, emergency medical officers and water pollution specialists ready to deploy to Japan but was looking for ways to reach the affected area.

Japan earthquake relief: How you can help Read More »

‘Battle: LA’ sticks to Corps values

If you like your Marine recruiting films dressed up with sci-fi action and lots of ’splosions, you’re going to love “Battle: Los Angeles.”

Don’t get me wrong—“Battle: LA” is a guilty geek pleasure that will have military aficionados either salivating or jotting down inaccuracies to blog about later. However, its genius marketing campaign belies the picture’s stark, simplistic script.

A cross between “Black Hawk Down” and “War of the World,” “Battle: LA” follows a Marine battalion engaging in urban warfare with evil ETs during a mission to rescue trapped civilians. Although director Jonathan Liebesman attempts an alien-invasion tale with a global scale, the focus on the survival of one unit – the Second Battalion, Fifth Marine – dooms the picture to a narrative scope more befitting a first-person shooter, like “Call of Duty.”

Without as much as a “We come in peace” (a la “Mars Attacks!”) the squid-like invaders in body armor begin a genocidal campaign to rid the planet of its pesky humans (why? to steal our water, of course). Cities around the globe are falling to the aliens, and the 2/5 out of Camp Pendleton is deployed to Los Angeles, pulling just-retired Staff Sgt. Michael Nantz (Aaron Eckhart) along for the ride. This doesn’t sit well with the young troops, who blame Nantz for the deaths of servicemen during an Iraq deployment. We get minimal backstories on the 2/5 Marines – one is expecting a baby, another is getting married, one had a brother killed under Nantz’s command – before the body count begins. Along the way, the dwindling platoon picks up civilian survivors (Bridget Moynahan, Michael Peña), straggler Marines and Air Force Tech Sgt. Elena Santos (Michelle Rodriguez), whose information could help provide Earth’s forces with the edge it needs to repel the invaders.

Marine camaraderie and the technical aspects of warfare holds “Battle: LA” together. But this leaves viewers with a jerky, bleak combat film without a larger message. (What happened to epic film the trailers promised?!)

After prolonged claustrophobic skirmishes – including a nod to Ripley taking command of the armored personnel carrier in “Aliens” – the cliché ending comes a little too fast, too furious.

And while the film could have used some “Independence Day” levity (apart from the unintentional humor), this macho apocalyptic ride does manage to pack in more than enough action for fanboys weaned on Michael Bay and XBox to make up for some of its deficits.

‘Battle: LA’ sticks to Corps values Read More »

Playing With Fire

Frequent, and even occasional, readers of this blog know that Community Advocates avoids the “Chicken Little” theory of human relations, that is seeing any hint of criticism or negative comment about minority groups as indicative of deep seated bigotry. Our op/eds and blogs over the past decade are replete with analyses that tend to grant the benefit of the doubt to comments that could be interpreted either benignly or negatively.

That outlook makes this column especially difficult to write.

We firmly believe that tolerance and broad- based acceptance of differences have become ingrained in American life and that other than loonies on the fringes, appeals to bigotry generally fall flat. Yet the recent rantings of two likely candidates for the presidency suggest that there that must be some utility in skirting the edges of bigotry and stereotyping when it comes to our first African American president.

Governor Mike Huckabee’s recent “misstatement” about Obama having been raised in Kenya and imbibing Mau Mau ideology is transparently false and could be ascribed to sloppiness. But Huckabee has continued down the same path of denouncing Obama’s otherness with a manifest lack of concern about the media and how he is being perceived.

In an ” title=”decries ” target=”_blank”>decries Obama’s “Kenyan, anti-colonial” mentality. 

It’s fascinating. Maybe they are sharing the same pollster, one who suggests that the only viable attack on the popular Obama is to paint him as an outsider who pretends to be a “real” American. He may sound like us, he may look like us but he’s really not of us because of that Kenyan father and the few years he spent overseas. He can be thought of in the same synapse with black militants (Mau Mau) and Islamic radicals (madrasas); the subtext is all too clear.

I don’t recall Huckabee questioning Mitt Romney’s American bona fides because of his years living overseas—as a nineteen year old Mormon missionary in France (I suspect they were short on Boy Scouts there and Rotary meetings might not have been omnipresent either.)

Given all the polls that have shown tolerance and acceptance becoming the credo of Americans, it’s distressing to think that there must be polling metrics out there which suggest that this kind of politics pays off.

The good news is that pundits, both right and left, decry this nastiness for what it is. Joe Klein in ” title=”piece” target=”_blank”>piece on Huckabee’s and Gingrich’s comments, he writes,

So the Republican winnowing process is far advanced. But the nominee may emerge much diminished by involvement in a process cluttered with careless, delusional, egomaniacal, spotlight-chasing candidates to whom the sensible American majority would never entrust a lemonade stand, much less nuclear weapons.

I share Will’s belief that there is, indeed, a “sensible American majority” that will reject these not so subtle appeals to bigotry.

Playing With Fire Read More »

Disaster Preparedness

I was I was going to post about a different topic today, but I could not ignore the devastation that befell Japan. The powerful earthquake and subsequent tsunami have caused destruction that is difficult to grasp. (See links below for two news articles.) The magnitude of the disaster is even more sobering when you realize that Japan is a developed modern high-tech country. Japan is extremely aware of earthquake risks and has modern building codes and frequent earthquake drills. Despite these efforts in the last 24 hours hundreds have been killed, 4 million people are without electricity, and mobile phone service and public transportation have been disrupted. I can’t remember the last time that a natural disaster caused hundreds of deaths in an advanced country.

My regular readers know that I’m not one to panic. A flip through the archives will demonstrate that I’m rarely worried about whatever issue is causing the latest hand-wringing. I didn’t think H1N1 flu would hurt a lot of people. I’m not worried about irradiated food, pesticides, or plastic bottles.

But natural disasters deserve our attention. Not because an earthquake of similar magnitude might happen here, but because an earthquake of similar magnitude will happen here. It’s only a matter of time. We, like Japan, live on a fault line. An 8.9 magnitude earthquake in LA is likely to kill more than all the people who have ever died of pesticides in food and chemicals seeping from plastic bottles. Worse than the immediate destruction, such a disaster would completely overtax our emergency response systems. Paramedics, police, fire fighters, and emergency rooms would immediately have too few resources to respond to too many emergencies.

Put simply, you and your family for at least a few days would be on your own. This deserves some panic, but panic after the disaster will not be very helpful. In this case panic before the disaster is essential. Another name for that is preparedness.

The CDC (link below) has a very sensible list of suggestions for preparing for a disaster. It suggests tips for storing non-perishable food and fresh water, assembling a kit of emergency supplies, and making an emergency plan with your family.

So please take a look at the CDC recommendations and schedule a specific time to get prepared. And spare a kind thought for the wounded, the missing, the homeless and the bereaved in Japan.

Learn more:

Wall Street Journal article: ” target=”_blank”>Japan earthquake, tsunami kill hundreds, cause crippling damage

CDC Emergency Preparedness and Response: Disaster Preparedness Read More »

The Ninth Circuit Court issues a rare smack-down to a civil rights group

Have the courts that have often been tolerant of questionable claims of racial discrimination finally begun to run out of patience?

This may be the case.  Recently the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals raised eyebrows by issuing a stinging rebuke to civil rights lawyers who brought a lawsuit that claimed their plaintiffs – poor and largely minority public bus riders in the San Francisco Bay Area – had been the victims of discrimination.

The smack-down of the advocate’s lawsuit is significant because the Ninth Circuit is widely seen as one of the more liberal federal courts in the nation.

One of the primary civil rights groups who brought the case is the Equal Justice Society, a group based in San Francisco with a long history of radical activism and “social justice” legal work.  Undeterred by the loss in court, they issued a statement on their website that asked the question, “Can the Poor Get Justice?” 

It’s clear that in the minds of the civil rights groups that sued the Bay Area’s Metropolitan Transit Commission the answer to that question is … no.  But even though a normally friendly federal court had just told them their case was bogus, the Equal Justice Society claimed the court had virtually turned its back on poor, minority bus riders.

The primary plaintiff in the case of Darensburg v. Metropolitan Transit Commission was Sylvia Darensburg, identified as an African-American mother of three who lives in East Oakland.  She’s someone the Equal Justice Society says “experiences the reality of transit inequality.” 

That inequality, according to them, was her having to rely on public buses as her primary source of transportation to get her to work and the college classes she attended at night.  She “endured” long waits for the two buses she rode and had to walk 12 blocks to get to and from the closest bus stop.

According to the evidence presented by the plaintiff’s lawyers, nearly 80 percent of Bay Area bus riders are people of color, and over 70 percent have incomes that are below $30,000.  They argued that almost 60 percent of the bus riders are entirely dependent on public buses for transportation.

The Ninth Circuit examined the facts, heard the evidence and concluded that no discrimination was taking place.  The evidence presented by the plaintiff’s counsel was that a regional transit expansion plan would have a disparate impact on minorities; the Bay Area’s rail service predominantly benefits white riders; and the Metropolitan Transit Commission has an intentionally inconsistent application of criteria to bus and rail projects that displayed a bias in favor of rail riders over bus riders.

But the Court discovered that, in fact, over 51 percent of rail riders were members of racial minority groups.  The Court also said, “The statistical measure upon which Plaintiffs relied to establish a prima facie case is unsound, and their claim rests upon a logical fallacy.”  Addressing the claim that a rail expansion plan would harm minorities, the Court stated “… the evidence shows that Bay Area minorities already benefit substantially from rail service” and that “no court could possibly determine whether MTC’s long-term expansion plan will help or harm the region’s minority transit riders.” 

Sounding a bit perturbed, the Court’s ruling was that, “The Plaintiffs failure to provide an appropriate measure of disparate impact also fatally undermines their claim of intentional discrimination.”  It went on to state “Not only does Plaintiff’s statistical evidence fail to prove discrimination, but their circumstantial evidence does not support any inference” that the transit company was motivated by racial bias.

But mirroring the worst example contained in so-called Critical Race Theory, something that has infected liberal law schools around the nation and argues that whites will always and forever be inherently racist, the Equal Justice Society’s president, Eva Patterson, along with that organization’s director of law and policy, Reggie Shuford, wrote an article for New America media that attempts to tie a neat bow of victimhood around their clients.

Ignoring the fact that the Ninth Circuit judges had said the lawyers representing the Plaintiffs had flat failed to make their case, Patterson and Shuford reached deep into the Critical Race Theory bag to argue that the liberal-leaning Ninth Circuit was somehow hostile to poor, black folk.

While admitting that today’s America has virtually eliminated the segregationists and vile white supremacists like George Wallace, they nonetheless conclude that “the majority of racial bias is structural or implicit … defining who has access to goods, services and opportunities.” In other words, because Sylvia Darensburg has to rely on a bus to get around the city, has to walk blocks to a bus stop, and has to wait awhile for a bus, the shadow of George Wallace still lurks in Oakland.

But the world we exist in is not always a fair place, and what the original architects of the civil movement struggled for was the equality of opportunity, not equality of outcomes.  It would be preferable that people who have to ride buses could find them to be safe, affordable, easily accessible and always arrived on time.

But because that may not always be the case in cities all over America, it doesn’t mean that race or class-based discrimination is at work, or a cabal of racists is busy inside a major American city’s transit authority to make life miserable for racial minorities who have to ride buses.

In his concurring opinion, Judge John T. Noonan stated “In the Bay Area … social change has been fostered by liberal political attitudes, and a culture of tolerance.  An individual bigot may be found, perhaps even a pocket of racists.  The notion of a bay Area board bent on racist goals is a specter that only desperate litigation could entertain.”

Ouch … desperate litigation?  But what are today’s civil rights advocates desperate about?  Could it be that shrinking bigotry and increasingly liberal racial attitudes has caused a “desperate” need to insist they are still relevant – even if racism may today be something that’s only occasionally implicit?

Joe Hicks is the vice president of Community Advocates and host of PJTV.com’s the “Hicks File.”  David Lehrer is president of Community Advocates.     

The Ninth Circuit Court issues a rare smack-down to a civil rights group Read More »

'Irvine 11' wants D.A. removed from case

Attorneys representing the Irvine 11 – Muslim college students who face misdemeanor criminal charges over the disruption of a 2010 speech by Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren at UCI – asked a judge to remove the O.C. District Attorney’s office from the case during an arraignment in Santa Ana Superior Court on Friday.

Defense lawyers are requesting that the state Attorney General handle the prosecution instead, claiming that the O.C. prosecutors illegally issued subpoenas and referred to the case internally as the “UCI Muslim Case,” the Orange County Register is reporting.

Prosecutors said the defense motion is based on slender evidence.

“The evidence that they say supports the motion is incredibly thin, so we’re happy to litigate that motion,” said Assistant District Attorney Dan Wagner.

Orange County Superior Court Judge Peter J. Wilson set an April 15 date for the next hearing at which he could decide whether to allow the motion to be litigated.

Wagner said the use of the “UCI Muslim Case” in the subject line of the email was simply shorthand for saying the Muslim Student Union “and I think it will be found very clearly that that’s no basis to recuse our office.”

About 150 supporters jammed the hallway outside the courtroom and then for a news conference following the hearing, with several of them using blue painter’s tape to cover their mouths.

The reference to the matter in an internal e-mail as the “UCI Muslim Case” shows a concern on the district attorney’s part not for justice but “for the perceived religion of our clients,” Daniel Mayfield, one of the attorneys representing the students, said at the news conference.

Prosecutors illegally convened a grand jury, illegally subpoenaed materials and illegally issued search warrants for materials to the grand jury, which finally resulted in an “immoral and illegal complaint,” he said.

Prosecutors said that search warrants can be used in certain misdemeanor cases.

“We’re not at all alarmed that they’re saying they’re going to file these motions. It’s typical in these cases and we’ll just litigate it. I don’t think they have stated any grounds at all that would lead to the suppression of the evidence (obtained),” Wagner said.

'Irvine 11' wants D.A. removed from case Read More »

An Offering of Wholeness

Last week, my family and I went to Souplantation for dinner. While we were eating, a colleague, Rabbi Morley Feinstein, came over to our table to say hello. He approached my then three-year-old daughter and asked her, “Is there a rabbi around here?” She looked at him puzzled. He responded, “Your mommy is a rabbi.” She responded, “All mommies are rabbis.”

I started to correct her. I explained that mommies could be rabbis or lawyers or doctors or anything they wanted to be. But Morley understood her statement differently. He agreed with her: “You’re right: all mommies are rabbis.”

For each biblical figure, the rabbis had a one word nickname or title. For example, Abraham is commonly called: “Abraham, our father.” Joseph is called, “Joseph the righteous.’ Moses is called: “Moses, our rabbi.” The rabbis considered Moses the model of the quintessential rabbi. Why? All of the patriarchs and matriarchs are spiritual teachers. What did Moses do that was the essence of what they aspired to as rabbis?

This week’s Torah portion begins the book of Vayikra (Leviticus). The project of building the tabernacle and the tent of meeting which consumed the last third of the book of Exodus is now concluded. In this opening portion, God instructs Moses what to teach the people to do in a range of situations. Moses teaches the people how to make sacrifices to atone for intentional and unintentional mistakes and how to bring offerings of wholeness in times of joy. Moses was the prototypical rabbi by teaching the people how to grapple with moments of anguish and celebration.

In reflecting on Hannah’s statement, I realized that’s exactly what parents do too. After the destruction of the temple, each home was considered a mikdash me’at (a small sanctuary). Indeed, parents make a home – a safe place for their children to grow. Within that space, they teach how to reconcile after making mistakes and how to celebrate life.

This Sunday was my daughter’s fourth birthday party. Together, she and I made a Dora the Explorer cake. We made the cake Thursday afternoon, decorated it Saturday night, and served it to her classmates on Sunday. In Vayikra (Leviticus), Moses instructed that the Sh’lamim (wholeness) offering which was given in times of joy was supposed to be eaten that day or the following day or else it needed to be discarded on the third day.  This stipulation encouraged the donor to invite many friends to join in the celebration.  Likewise, Hannah’s birthday cake was an “offering of wholeness” to celebrate another year of her life.

Being a rabbi (or clergy-person) is one of the most respected professions in our society. Unfortunately, being a “home-maker” or “stay-at home” parent seems to be one of the least-respected jobs. (Indeed, this profession even lacks a good title.) In some ways, clergy and parent seem to be polar-opposite roles. Leading a congregation is a high-profile position, involving lots of public speaking and dealing with hundreds of people. Being a parent is a largely private affair, without much of an audience, focusing intensely on a few precious souls.

Yet the essential task of clergy and parents is the same. Both teach people how to face times of joy and sorrow; and both create sacred spaces where God can be found.

Hannah was right. All mommies and daddies are rabbis.

An Offering of Wholeness Read More »

This week in power: Obama, Wisconsin, Circumcision, Arkansas

A roundup of the most talked about political and global stories in the Jewish world this week:

Obama: Israel is safe
The president met last week with Jewish leaders in what was described as an “extraordinary session” about how the Mideast revolts impact Israel, reported the ” title=”Commentary” target=”_blank”>Commentary. This administration “still thinks the solution to the problem of Iran is to solve a problem having nothing to do with it.” But, Richman pointed out, Obama’s team didn’t seem to have a handle on Libya or Egypt either. What should he be doing for Israel? Obama must “demand of the Palestinian leadership, not only that they cease incitement against Israel, but begin to prepare their people for peace and reconciliation. That is the real impediment to peace,” said Dan Gordon at ” title=”The Forward” target=”_blank”>The Forward. Ordinarily we have a loud voice on issues, but “Wisconsin is different” for some reason. Cary Spivak, also in ” title=”TownHall.com” target=”_blank”>TownHall.com. “Government union leaders are portraying Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker as a new Haman: You want to hang us, we’ll hang you.”

The Pope clears the Jews
That should settle that. In his new book, Jesus of Nazareth, Part II, Pope Benedict XVI says that the Jews did not kill Jesus,” according to ” title=”IsraelNationalNews” target=”_blank”>IsraelNationalNews, “making his statement appear as nothing more than lip service in the 21st century.” Well, said a Los Angeles Times editorial, “considering the fact that anti-Semitism still exists, it’s not possible for Catholic leaders to speak out against this often enough,” even today. Consider, though, that this announcement wasn’t with Jews in mind or “to be politically correct,” said Eugene Korn at ” title=”he said” target=”_blank”>he said. Jewish groups are worried that the city could ban its religious practice. “This is hurtful and offensive to people in the community who consider this a coveted ritual,” said Anti-Defamation League director ” title=”The Stir” target=”_blank”>The Stir.

Arkansas’ anti-Semitism scare
Arkansas politician Chuck Chatham was quoted in an e-mail as saying he chose to run for state legislature against Democrat Jerry Rephan, because he Rephan is a “pro-abortion Jewish lawyer,” according to ” title=”Blue Arkansas blog” target=”_blank”>Blue Arkansas blog. And this incident of “blatant anti-Semitism by Republican officials isn’t an aberration,” warned ” title=”reports” target=”_blank”>reports.

Danny Groner is the Online Managing Editor for TheWeek.com and a contributor to other sites including The Jewish Journal

This week in power: Obama, Wisconsin, Circumcision, Arkansas Read More »

Drinking does not drive the Purim celebration

We are an American generation sadly marred by excess, addiction, and reduced public morals. On line at the supermarket we see magazines that headline Lindsay Lohan, Brittany Spears, and Charlie Sheen.  Purim is around the corner, and the question arises: What’s the deal with getting drunk on Purim?  So here’s the deal:

An alcoholic in recovery may not drink wine on Purim and should drink only grape juice at the Passover Seder.  Others need not drink wine on Purim if they prefer not to do so.  Teens in particular should not be plied with wine.  Any wine that one drinks on Purim is meant to be drunk specifically during the special Mitzvah Feast – the Purim Seudah eaten during Purim Day, replete with the careful recital of all brakhot (blessings) for washing one’s hands preparatory to eating bread, for eating the bread itself, and for thanking G-d after the meal during the four brakhot of the bentching grace after meals.  One also may drink wine during any Purim celebratory meal on Purim night after Megillah reading.  Again, however, the wine drinking must be tempered and must be only an adjunct to eating a mitzvah meal marked by the recital of brakhot.  It is forbidden to drink too much, and Judaism points to Noah and Lot as examples of what happens to degrade the sanctity of the human spirit when one overindulges.  One absolutely should withdraw from environments where celebrants drink too much.  That is not Judaism.  It is “Jersey Shore.”

The tradition of drinking alcohol, particularly wine, on Purim stems from the centrality of wine-drinking throughout the Megillah narrative.  Stem?  Where?

The encounter begins with King Achashverosh staging a massive empire-wide party of wine-drinking and eating for 180 days, followed by seven more days of wine partying for his inner circle and residents of his capital.  The Megillah text, augmented by the Talmudic and Midrashic commentaries, tell us how detailed the wine aspect was.  Each party-goer was served wine carefully selected for each participant from the vineyards of the respective province in which he lived.  People were served wine aged longer than their respective ages.  No one was forced to drink.

Under the influence of the wine, as partiers were arguing whether Medean women or Persian women are more beautiful, the King drunkenly decided to demonstrate that his wife’s appearance surpassed all and demanded that his Queen Vashti appear completely undressed – wearing only her tiara – before his advisors.  According to the text, amplified by the Midrashic tradition, she refused and sent back a sharply worded response that her husband should be ashamed of himself for losing his sobriety in a way that her family’s men never would.  The King became enraged and, as he lost his head in anger, he had her beheaded.

Later, when the King selected Esther from among the huge selection of women with whom he was spending respective nights, he celebrated with a wine party, the “Esther Party,” also accompanied by a tax holiday in her honor.  In time, as Haman emerged with his genocidal plan to murder the Jews of all the King’s 127 provinces, Esther – prompted by Mordechai’s importuning and a city-wide three-day public Jewish fast for God’s mercy – devised a strategy to save her people.  She invited the King and Haman to a private wine party in their honor.  As amplified by the Midrash, that party made Haman oh-so-proud, but it planted concerns in the King’s mind:  “What the heck was Haman doing at the private party? Why is my wife inviting this guy to our little private cozy wine party?  Is something up between them?  Are they having an affair?  Are they planning to kill me, like anachronistically in Hamlet or something?”

It really bothered the King. That night he couldn’t sleep, maybe because he was afraid his wife and Haman were plotting his assassination.  Maybe it was his Circadian rhythm.  So, to calm himself down, and lacking a television to watch, an Ipod to hear, a Twitter account to Tweet, a computer to Facebook, or anything else, he turned to his favorite pastime:  having his aides read him his favorite stories – namely, stories about himself, from his royal diary.  They pulled out the book and started reading.  It may even be that he worried whether he had failed in the past to show ample gratitude to someone who had saved his life by conveying an insider’s tip of an assassination plot.  “Perhaps,” he may have thought, “if I demonstrate that I never forget inside-tippers, I can encourage someone else now to tell me whether Haman and my wife are conniving against me.”  With G-d’s hidden face guiding the course of events, the reader turned to a long-forgotten entry about a murder plot that had been thwarted thanks to an inside tip that had come just-in-the-nick-of-time to save the King’s life.  Hearing the story, he was reminded that he owed his life to Mordechai the Jew but never had done a thing to show gratitude.  The time now was well into midnight, and he suddenly hears noise outside his window, in his courtyard.  “Who in the world could that be at this time of the night?” he asks.  It is Haman, so excited about hanging Mordechai the Jew tomorrow on the scaffold he has erected in his backyard, that he can’t sleep either.  So Haman has come past midnight to ask the King’s OK to kill the Jew, even as the King is unable to sleep at midnight, perhaps concerned that Haman is planning with Esther to murder him . . . like, maybe, at midnight when he is sleeping?  Or whatever.

The story unfolds into the next day, and another Esther wine party.  Again, just the three of them: the triangle of King, Haman, and Esther.  And it is there, under the influence of that wine, that Esther reveals her nation, her place of birth, and that Haman is planning to murder her people. As she reveals to the king, for the very first time, that she is a Jew, a member of that people whom Haman has undertaken to obliterate, the King goes into a rage, loses his head augmented by the wine, and orders Haman hanged.

So that is the reason that our Rabbis encouraged us to drink some wine at the Purim feast.  The Jews of that miraculous period gave gifts of food to one another, so we give mishlo’ach manot.  They circulated the Megillah narrative among their 127 provinces, so we assemble to read it and to hear every word. They feasted, so we feast. They drank some wine, so we drink some wine.  In a famous Talmudic aphorism, our Rabbis taught that we should drink enough wine so that we would not be able to discern between “Arur Haman” (Cursed is Haman) and “Barukh Mordechai” (Blessed is Mordechai).  Babylonian Talmud, Mesechet Megillah 7b; Shulchan Arukh, Orach Chaim 695:2.  In one particular outlier incident, the Talmud in Mesechet Megillah recounts that two rabbis, Rabbah and Rav Zeira, made for themselves a private Purim feast, and one got so drunk that he inadvertently killed the other.  When he sobered, he was so remorseful, prayed so hard, and called upon all his holy merits from an otherwise spotless life that he succeeded in bringing about the miracle of a lifetime, as his deceased rabbinic friend returned to life. The Talmud continues, recounting that the next year the same rabbi invited his same friend to another two-man private Purim party, but this time his friend turned him down, explaining: “I can’t count on miracles every year.” (Literally: “Miracles do not happen all the time.”)

So there we have the dichotomy: yes, good to drink wine.  Forget the difference between Haman and Mordechai.  But don’t get all-that-drunk.  Our greatest Rabbinic Sages over the centuries have wrestled with the dichotomy, looking to harmonize the themes.  One Rabbi, the Magen Avraham, noted that the gematria numerology – the sum of the letters of the words, with each Hebrew letter having a numerical value – of “Arur Haman” (Cursed is Haman) is 502.  And the letters comprising “Barukh Mordechai” (Blessed is Mordechai) also equal 502.  (See M.A. Comment 3 on Shulchan Arukh, Orach Chaim 695:2.)  So, he said, drink only until you can’t do the tally of those numbers in your head.  Another taught that you should drink only enough to make yourself a bit drowsy, which will lead you to fall asleep, and – unless you have a Purim dream – you then will be in state where you don’t know the difference between Haman and Mordechai. (See, e.g., Ram”a on Shulchan Arukh 695:2.)  A similar approach is taken by Rambam (Maimonides). (Mishneh Torah, Hilkhot Megillah 2:15).

In recent years, as American culture in general, and our teen culture in particular, has grown depressingly coarse – witness television shows like “Jersey Shore” and “Skins” and a society where more people know the daily thoughts, so to speak, of Charlie Sheen and Lindsay Lohan than they do of their Congressional representative or the Poet Laureate of the United States – more rabbis than ever have called for bans on teen drinking during Purim and also have condemned the practice of certain outlier sects who would encourage drinking to the point of barfing on Main Street.  Judaism despises drunkenness, and Rambam explicitly warned against it.  (See, e.g., Mishneh Torah, Hilkhot  De’ot 5:3; Hilkhot Sh’vitat Yom Tov 6:20)

It therefore devolves on the individual to know his or her limits, his or her values.  If you are drinking some wine at a Mitzvah Purim Feast, a Seudat Purim marked by reciting brakhot (blessings) when washing your hands and eating bread, and then reciting more brakhot at the bentching prayers after the meal, that’s cool.  On the other hand, if it is not a Seudah feast of Mitzvah, but just one more excuse to go drinking and getting a “buzz,” then such wine drinking would be forbidden as a coarse denigration of the extraordinary sanctity of the human soul that was created in the image of G-d.  It would be a mockery and desecration of the miracle of Purim.  And it would be a shame.

Rabbi Dov Fischer, adjunct professor of law at Loyola Law School, is a columnist for several online magazines and is rabbi of Young Israel of Orange County.  He blogs at rabbidov.com.

Drinking does not drive the Purim celebration Read More »