fbpx

September 8, 2010

You don’t know Jack

Among the many people to whom I owe an apology this year is Jack Bielan.

Four months ago, I received a CD of new Jewish music called

“God Makes Mistakes,” which I put in my stack of CDs of new Jewish music, intending to get to it one day. After that, I got an e-mail from a man named Jack Bielan, who asked me if I had received his CD. After that came phone calls, more e-mails and two more copies of the CD.

What can I say? Hundreds of books, CDs and DVDs fly through our offices — Jews are a ridiculously productive people. Some are bound to fall through the cracks, passed from editor to writer to — anyway, that’s my excuse.

One day last month, while I was in the middle of back-to-back meetings and phone calls, a middle-age man walked into my office. Average height, thinning hair, captivatingly blue eyes, dressed in jeans and a work shirt.

“Did you have an appointment?” I asked.

“Hi,” he said, “Jack Bielan.”

He handed me a copy of his CD.

“I don’t need an apology,” he said, and settled into one of my chairs. “I just want to tell you a story.”

Fifteen years ago, on Sept. 17, 1995, Bielan’s 17-year-old stepson, Blake, whom he had raised from the age of 1, and his 14-year-old daughter, Samantha, were driving home from an errand in the family van. Blake was lanky, easygoing and had just returned from a trip to Israel that had turned his teenage life around. Samantha was the life of the neighborhood — bubbly and caring. It was the first time in his life as an over-protective father that Bielan had allowed them to drive alone together.

At 1 a.m., their van was hit head-on by a drunk driver, speeding along the wrong side of the road.

“My kids were killed instantly,” Bielan said; “14 and 17.”

Bielan saw I was beyond words, so he filled them in for me.

“There are no words,” he said.

Of course, I was thinking of my own children, who are 14 and 17. I couldn’t imagine how he went on after the crash.

Bielan described years of nightmares, screaming, weeks spent on the verge of suicide. An accomplished musician and music producer, for years he had served as music director of Valley Outreach Synagogue in Encino. But after all those years leading prayer services, he felt utterly abandoned, bereft, faithless. All that tethered him to the world was his youngest daughter, Megan, who was 8 years old at the time of the crash.

The years of agony that followed his children’s deaths led Bielan from one house of God to another, seeking answers wherever he could. He couldn’t believe his children were gone.

One Sunday morning, Bielan, despondent, staggered out of bed, then found himself dressed and driving on a freeway, close to pointing his car off the road and over a cliff.

Instead, he saw a church and drove into the parking lot. He staggered inside.

“I’m a choir director for a Jewish synagogue,” he said to the woman who stopped him at the door. “Two of my children were killed by a drunk driver. … I think I’m in trouble.”

Without hesitating, the woman brought him to the elder. Bielan realized he had wandered into the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a Mormon church.

The elder led Bielan to a small room, where he and the woman sat talking with Bielan for hours. What the elder said saved Bielan’s life — that for millennia, intelligent people of all faiths have believed that the soul goes on after death.

That moment was the beginning of Bielan’s struggle back. His children weren’t really gone. He returned to his music, and poured his grief and love into an album of original compositions. Music, he told me, was the way he knew he could reach them.

We talked for a while longer. After he left, I listened to the CD.

The music is beautiful — Bielan has worked with James Taylor and Seals & Crofts, among others. Superb singers and musicians grace the songs.

The lyrics are forged in pain, but somehow forgiving.

Do you hide from the truth that life won’t last forever?
Have you ever stopped to wonder what it is you’re living for?
If you find yourself so confident that life will stay in place,
You’d better watch your step, my friend,
Just on the chance that sometimes,
Just once in a while,
God makes mistakes.

What struck Bielan along this godawful journey for answers was how, when it comes to ineffable tragedy, all the great faith traditions seem to point in common directions. No matter how great our suffering, we always have the opportunity to inspire, support, nurture, encourage and heal one another. That’s not the purpose of tragedy, but it’s the path back to life.

That realization doesn’t have to come from communities of faith. But religion, for all its rules, long services and silly hats, has actually thought long and hard about the questions Bielan asked, and has built a scaffolding of people, text and institutions to make sure those not-so-simple answers are transmitted and put into practice. That’s why, this New Year, Bielan will be back on the bimah, singing.

At the end of our visit, Bielan actually tried to apologize to me for appearing unannounced in my office.

“But,” he said, “I just thought you’d want to hear this. I believe I have something to teach.”

He does.

Shanah tovah.

You don’t know Jack Read More »

Jewish Journal reorganizes for media’s digital age

The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles is marking its upcoming 25th anniversary with a wide-ranging reorganization and diversification of its corporate structure, media services, community role and financial base.

To reflect the changes, The Journal has become part of the newly established Tribe Media Corp., “which will redefine community journalism for the digital age,” according to Rob Eshman, editor-in-chief of The Journal.

“Our goal is to use every technology at our disposal to inform and convene our community and to bring our community’s ideas and values to society at large — while creating a thriving, sustainable business,” Eshman said. “This is the future of community journalism.”

A small group of community-minded business executives is backing the newly formed company with its expertise and investments.

Led by The Journal’s chairman of the board, Irwin Field, the group includes Internet executive and venture capitalist Art Bilger; Peter Lowy, group managing director of the Westfield Group, one of the largest retail property companies in the world; and an anonymous donor.

The group members have jointly committed $800,000 over the next two years and are joining in developing a new business model, which, the group believes, the Jewish media must adopt if it is to survive.

Currently, most Jewish community weeklies rely on advertising, subscriptions and substantial subvention from local federations, but many face a constant struggle for survival. The Jewish Journal is not affiliated with the Jewish Federation and receives no subvention from it.

In Los Angeles, in addition to a new membership-subscription model, offering benefits, The Journal is distributed free at bookstores, delicatessens, synagogues and so forth, with a 95 percent pickup rate, which is now attracting some large commercial advertisers targeting an affluent readership.

A second part of the new model is investment by private donors or foundations, and the third is diversification.

Following that rule, Tribe Media Corp. consists of five divisions: The weekly Jewish Journal; a new monthly magazine, TRIBE; jewishjournal.com; TRIBE Live! for the production of live events and videos; and everyjew.com., a fast-growing social network launched in August.

The new business model will be under constant review and, while “we may need five to 10 years to see whether the model will work,” Lowy said, he sees his investment as part of a long-range involvement.

Bilger, founding partner and managing member of Shelter Capital Partners, said that Tribe’s financial future will depend on the general economic environment, participation of additional investors and “how quickly we can ramp up the digital component of Tribe.”

Actually, jewishjournal.com has in a relatively short time become the largest Jewish news Web site outside Israel, with nearly 400,000 monthly unique viewers. Eshman expects this figure to rise to 500,000 viewers by the end of this year, and eventually to 1 million.

“We know we are by a factor of 10 the largest Jewish Web site in Los Angeles,” said Eshman, “but our goal is to use the Web’s reach to bring people everywhere into the conversation.”

Lowy, Bilger and the anonymous investor have joined Tribe’s board and executive committee, along with Leon C. Janks, managing partner of Green, Hasson & Janks LLP.

They are taking an active part in developing the business side of Tribe but will adhere to the policy set by Field and previous publishers of noninterference in the editorial independence of the paper and Web site.

“I hope we will continue to represent a variety of views, and we should never stifle dissenting opinions at any time,” Bilger said. “Our job is to make sure that we have the best people possible working for Tribe.”

Primary day-by-day responsibility for translating the new business model into a favorable bottom line will rest with Steven Karash, Tribe’s executive vice president for advertising and marketing. Karash served for 10 years as national advertising director for the Los Angeles office of the New York Times Media Group.

When The Jewish Journal was founded in 1986, the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles and some of its leaders played a major part in its establishment, but in 2005, both sides decided to sever the relationship.

“We live in a much different world than when I came to Los Angeles 20 years ago,” said Lowy, 51, who arrived here from his native Australia.

“My colleagues and I run our businesses with a global view, and the Jewish community will have to operate increasingly with a similar outlook,” Lowy said.

Bilger, who is in his 50s, said that what persuaded him to become involved with Tribe was the challenge of an interesting project and, like Lowy, confidence in Eshman’s vision and ability, and the dedication of the Tribe staff.

“I believe that Tribe and The Journal can play an increasingly important role, not only in Los Angeles but on the national and international Jewish scene,” Bilger observed.

Focusing on Los Angeles alone, where only 20 to 25 percent of all Jews have any kind of Jewish affiliation, Tribe can be the primary connecting point between community members, Field said.

Lowy lauded Field for his outstanding job as chairman of the board of The Journal, a nonprofit organization.

However, Lowy added, it became clear to him that “without major new investment, the paper’s survival was at risk.”

As for the future, Lowy said he envisions that Tribe will generate 90 to 95 percent of its operating budget through advertisements and other revenue sources, and 5 to 10 percent through philanthropic investments.

Aside from their intensive business careers and heavy civic involvements, Field, Lowy and Bilger all are longtime activists in Jewish and Israel causes.

Field is a former chairman of the Los Angeles’ Jewish Federation, a governor of the Jewish Agency for Israel, served as board member of the American Jewish University and National Foundation for Jewish Culture, and currently is heavily involved with the Technion.

Lowy served as chair of the board of the American Jewish University and he and his wife, Janine, are involved supporters of the Milken Commmunity High School, Etta Israel Center, Jewish Federation, Camp Ramah, Jaffa Institute, Pressman Academy of Temple Beth Am, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Bilger is vice chairman of the Skirball Cultural Center, and, with his wife, Dahlia, active in Bet Tzedek legal services and StandWithUs, a pro-Israel educational organization.

In a recent article in The Los Angeles Times under the headline “New Life for Jewish Journal,” columnist James Rainey commented that The Journal was successfully meeting the tough challenges posed by the national economy and the general media market.

“By banking hard on two of the most robust growth trends in 21st century media — niche journalism and philanthropy — The Jewish Journal appears to have extended its life expectancy and expanded its coverage of Jewish life in Southern California,” Rainey wrote.

“If the experience holds lessons for other ethnic- and religious-oriented publishers, it’s that you can do good by being good,” he added.

Jewish Journal reorganizes for media’s digital age Read More »

Support your local scientist

Ever wish that you could round up some top scientists and put them to work researching one of your particular interests in medicine, energy or the cosmos?
Well, the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) has heard you and has come up with a mechanism to put the general idea into practice.
The BSF is one of those government initiatives that rarely breaks into the news, but which has done a great deal to stimulate scientific research and, incidentally, strengthen relations between Israel and the United States.
Since its beginning in 1972, BSF has allotted $480 million, contributed equally by the governments of the two nations, to support some 4,000 research projects at 190 universities.
Each project teams up Israeli with American scientists, who over the years have collaborated on numerous important projects. Current studies include research in cancer diagnosis, stem cell therapy, search for life in the universe, and protection against chemical warfare and insecticide poisoning.
“A BSF grant is highly prestigious in the scientific community,” said Art Ellis, UC San Diego vice chancellor for research. “There are many examples of successful projects conducted by collaborating U.S. and Israeli scholars that were facilitated by BSF funding. This partnership is path-breaking.”
BSF gets its funds from the interest derived from a $100 million endowment, but the annual yield has dropped with the shaky economy.
To compensate, Gary Leo, BSF’s national director of development, has initiated a program to support a BSF project between a scientist from a local American university and an Israeli researcher at, for instance, the Technion, Tel Aviv University, Weizmann Institute of Science, or Hebrew University.
The program is called the Multiplier Research Grants Fund and the University of California, San Diego has been chosen as the initial American participant.
In practice that means that San Diego residents will be asked to supplement the BSF grant of a UC San Diego scientist, and his or her Israeli partner, in the area of the donor’s interest.
Leo said he hopes to expand the program nationwide and expects private support in the next two years to total between $3 to $5 million.
For more information on the new program, contact Gary Leo at (310) 264-1606, or e-mail gary@bsf.org.il.
To find out more the binational science foundation, visit www.bsf.org.il.

Support your local scientist Read More »

It’s corporate power vs. government oversight in November election

I was going to write about the Glenn Beck White People’s March on Washington, but then I read Jane Mayer’s path-breaking article in the Aug. 30 New Yorker about the billionaire Koch brothers (David and Charles) and their financial backing of the anti-Obama movement. Why should I be paying so much attention to the paid clowns and crazies when it’s the quiet, hidden monied folks who are pulling the strings and will reap the real benefits of a Republican takeover of Congress in November?

Make no mistake about it: This election isn’t about whether Obama is a Muslim or a socialist, whether the proposed mosque/recreation center in New York City is a terrorist haunt, whether the health-care bill has death panels or whether Democrats want to impose Sharia law on America (give me a break). It’s about whether corporate power will meet its match in an effective government in Washington. This election has more to do with salmonella-laced eggs, mine disasters and global warming than it does with Sarah Palin’s inane Tweets or the loony Tea Party candidates who are winning Republican nominations for House and Senate.

I have decided to spend less time thinking about Beck, Palin, Sharron Angle, Rand Paul and the fact that, according to a Newsweek poll, more than half of Republicans think that Obama might be trying to impose Islamic law on America. My brain can only handle so much mishegoss. I am going to spend some quality time instead thinking about how important it is that the government regulate the production of eggs, the safety of mines and the development of offshore oil, and that the wealthiest Americans pay the share of taxes they did before George W. Bush gave them the keys to the vault.

Refusing to be diverted by the dark comedy of political insanity, we face the well-funded and sadly sane political operations of the Koch brothers. As possessors of the third-largest fortune in America, they helped create and bankroll the Tea Party movement, the “science” of global-warming denial and the think tanks that dredge up phony research to attack every policy of the Obama administration, especially those that directly affect their bottom line. One of their companies has even contributed money to a ballot measure to suspend California’s Global Warming Law.

The Koch plan has been quite successful. In association with Fox News and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, they have helped turn the Republican party into a well-disciplined tool to advocate for corporate freedom from government control. The crazies within the party are now not all that different from the “sane” because any Republican in Congress who strays from the party line may face a primary defeat. They all miraculously agree that the wealthiest Americans must keep their tax cuts and that the federal government should stop interfering with the wise decisions made by American corporations.

The Tea Partyers, not the sharpest tools in the shed, march to demand that they not be forced to receive quality health care at reasonable prices, and that the Internet should not remain free and accessible to all, including them. Getting them to blame their own frustrations on brown people, black people and Muslims is no big stretch and keeps them occupied and angry.

It’s no wonder that the corporate bigwigs feel entitled this year. After all, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in the Citizens United case that corporations should be allowed to spend unlimited funds from their treasuries to support or oppose candidates, as long as the expenditures are “independent” of the campaigns.

Corporations will be at their most powerful in late hits on Democrats in close races around the country. There will be no time to decode who is behind their attacks, and there will be unlimited funds to make their allegations — true or not — stick. Republicans in Congress currently are blocking a bill to require corporations to at least reveal what they are doing.

Before we give up in the face of this corporate dominance, though, let’s consider that arrogance is usually the downfall of even the most powerful entities. The more certain these corporate forces are that they are going to win in November, the bolder they will become and the more mistakes they will likely make. Corporate entities thrive in darkness and shrivel up in sunshine. They hide their money behind organizations with benign names because, when exposed to the light, the impact of their support evaporates. The Koch brothers’ vehicle? The Americans for Prosperity Foundation — who wouldn’t want that?

While Americans are at least ambivalent toward rich individuals, we don’t much cotton to rich corporations. I remember being at Albertson’s one year, when a petition gatherer asked me whether I opposed smoking in restaurants, and, if so, would I sign this lovely petition? I asked who was behind it, and he finally admitted, “Phillip Morris.” Not only did I not sign, but the line of potential signers behind me drifted away, muttering.

In the 2010 California primaries, two ballot measures with no organized opposition went down to defeat when it became known that a few self-interested corporations were behind them. The same fate may befall Proposition 23 when people figure out which out-of-state polluting corporations are trying to suspend California’s global warming law. The Sacramento Bee reported on Sept. 3 that a Koch brothers company joined the other coporate titans behind Proposition 23 with a $1 million contribution. What will happen in New York City when liberal fans of the ballet discover from Mayer’s investigation that while David Koch gives oodles of money to American Ballet Theatre, Koch Industries is fighting to keep the formaldehyde it produces from being classified by the government as a carcinogen?

What if Democrats, sulking in their tents because Obama is not perfect, were to wake up and see what’s really at stake in November? Might that close the enthusiasm gap between the parties? Could cringing, intimidated Democrats rise up from their corner, down in the polls, and fight their way back into the debate by taking on the heads of the opposition, the corporate chieftains at the gates? Forget about Sharia law and death panels. It’s all about the eggs.

Raphael J. Sonenshein is chair of the Division of Politics, Administration, and Justice at California State University, Fullerton.

It’s corporate power vs. government oversight in November election Read More »

Understanding the lost art of repentance and its urgency

In the past several months I have had some version of the following exchange several times. I tell a friend that I’ve just finished a book on repentance, and he responds that he finds the subject of forgiveness very interesting. It’s psychologically so much healthier to forgive than to hold on to resentments, he says, signaling that he appreciates the importance of the subject.

The confusion of repentance and forgiveness is widespread, it seems, and also very telling.

Forgiveness, I explain, is what we are called on to do when we have been wronged by others. It is about our willingness to be generous and compassionate with those whose behavior was hurtful and unwarranted.

Repentance, by contrast, is what we are called on to do when we have wronged others. It involves confession of our transgressions, feeling remorseful, making an apology, seeking forgiveness (hence the confusion in the minds of so many), offering restitution, soul-searching and ultimately uprooting old patterns of behavior from our lives.

In these weeks leading up to Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, it seems that the need to understand what repentance is and why it matters is more urgent than ever.

Forgiveness is difficult and rare, to be sure, but I want to suggest that engaging in real repentance is far more difficult, more easily misunderstood and far less frequently practiced. Despite the many dozens of sermons that our rabbis have given on the subject of repentance, the process of repenting remains something of a mystery to most Jews (and, of course, not only Jews). Many never take seriously the need for repentance. Others start out on the path of repentance but give up when they encounter one of the many obstacles along the way.

Repentance, in our time, has become a lost art. Consider several examples, which I suspect all of us will find familiar.

• The family member who regularly deflects any suggestion that he or she has done something to hurt others by insisting repeatedly that it’s really someone else’s fault;
• The boss who can acknowledge making mistakes but can never quite say the words “I’m sorry,” or worse, can say the words but not express genuine remorse;
• The spouse who cheats on a partner and apologizes profusely, but who is utterly unprepared to do the hard work of restoring the trust that he or she has undermined;
• The friend who has a habit of speaking harshly or acting impulsively, but lacks the self-awareness to explore the real roots of those dysfunctional patterns of behavior;
• The person who has promised repeatedly to reform her ways — to give up smoking, to make more time for her children, to be less judgmental of others — yet continually falls back into old patterns.

In light of these examples — and hardly a day goes by when we don’t encounter others — we do well to ask: What makes genuine repentance so difficult? And why should we even bother trying?

Repentance, what Jewish tradition has called teshuvah — “turning” or “returning” — entails nothing less than a radical transformation of our selves and our relationship to others. It requires profound psychological self-awareness, which includes both recognizing our own moral blind spots and exploring the character traits that cause our moral lapses in the first place.

It demands that we take full responsibility for our behavior, without hesitation or equivocation, and then take action to undo the effects of that behavior on others. And if this were not enough, Judaism teaches that the process of teshuvah is never really finished. Each time we have an opportunity to make the same mistake again, we need to renounce the past and choose a different path.

So doing teshuvah is literally an endless process. Forgiving others for their transgressions against us is a piece of cake by comparison.

There are many obstacles on the path to true repentance: ego, self-deception, dishonesty and stubbornness, to name just a few. Because we all want the approval of those we love, it is tempting to cover up or minimize any actions that might cause us to lose their affection. Because we all know that others expect us to make amends when we hurt them, it is tempting to feign remorse and utter empty words of apology.

But counterfeit repentance, like counterfeit currency, has no value. We can’t restore our integrity or repair our relationships with others by merely pretending to repent; there are no shortcuts to an ethical life.

All of which explains why genuine repentance is so rare. The work of examining ourselves and repairing the relationships we have broken is arduous and always has been.

The culture in which we live only compounds the difficulties. The expectation that we can find a quick fix for every problem that arises makes us less prepared to engage in the long, morally demanding work of teshuvah, and even less inclined to try. When virtual friends take the place of real relationships, we lose the impetus to cultivate the sort of emotional honesty that teshuvah requires of us.

The costs of ignoring the work of repentance are not easily quantifiable, but the evidence is all around us. We see it in the lives of public figures — politicians and corporate executives — who get caught in some deceitful or fraudulent behavior, and then baldly deny it.

We see it on daytime television shows, where people confess their transgressions before a live audience, never displaying a hint of the contrition or soul searching that is the mark of repentance.

Most of all, we know it in those quiet moments in our own lives when we recognize that we are not living up to our own moral standards, yet don’t know how to restore our own sense of wholeness and integrity.

The ultimate benefit of doing teshuvah is that it offers us a way to overcome our past precisely because we have confronted and taken full responsibility for it. It enables us to escape the sense of guilt — in some cases, even despair — with which many of us live.

In its place, we come to live with self-acceptance and hope because we know that moral renewal is always a possibility. We may even discover, as the ancient rabbis taught, that through repentance our transgressions can be transformed into merits. The rewards of doing teshuvah are commensurate with the effort we expend.

This year when we celebrate the 10 days of repentance, the holiest days on the Jewish calendar, we would do well to focus on what repentance is and what it is not. Surely it is easier to think of this as a time to forgive others for their transgressions against us. But it is far more rewarding to remember that this time is really a gift, an opportunity to engage in searching moral introspection about the ways in which we have harmed others and so failed to be our best selves.

Tradition has laid out the path to follow, as well as how we can work with our internal resistance and what we stand to gain in the process. All that we require is an accurate understanding of what is required of us and the will to begin anew.

Louis E. Newman is the John M. and Elizabeth W. Musser Professor of Religion and the Humphrey Doermann Professor of Liberal Learning at Carleton College in Northfield, Minn. He is the author most recently of “Repentance: The Meaning and Practice of Teshuvah,” published this year by Jewish Lights.

Understanding the lost art of repentance and its urgency Read More »

Deputy in Mel Gibson arrest sues LA Sheriff

James Mee, the Jewish sheriff’s deputy who arrested actor Mel Gibson on a drunken-driving charge, is suing the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department for harassment since the July 2006 incident.

Because he reported requests from superiors to remove Gibson’s anti-Semitic tirade from the initial arrest report, the department has continuously passed him over for deserved promotions and retaliated in other ways, Mee charged in his suit, the Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday.

When Gibson was stopped on the Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu on suspicion of driving under the influence, he asked Mee “Are you a Jew?” and then ranted that “The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.”

Mee, 55, included Gibson’s remarks in his initial report, to illustrate how drunk the actor was, but said that superiors told him to put the Gibson slurs in a separate report, not available to the public.

Yael Trock, Mee’s attorney, charged that the request by Mee’s superiors stemmed from Gibson’s celebrity status and friendship with Sheriff Lee Baca.

Mee, who still works as a sheriff’s deputy, agreed to the separate report, but its content was made public immediately by a Hollywood web site.

Mee was suspected of leaking the report, “because he is Jewish,” Trock said, and the deputy has consistently denied the charge.

A department spokesman denied Mee’s allegations of retaliation and ethnic discrimination.

After his 2006 arrest, Gibson repeatedly apologized to the Jewish community for his anti-Semitic outburst.

Deputy in Mel Gibson arrest sues LA Sheriff Read More »

True paths to Teshuvah

Daniel Rope knew the apology to his sister would be the hardest one to make.

His mother, after all, was his mother — throughout his drug addiction, starting at age 12, Dan’s mother had stood by him, believed he would somehow pull out of it. She was at all his court appearances, she went to Alcoholics Anonymous to figure out the best way to help him, she implicitly forgave him for stealing from her, for keeping her up at night wondering if he was dead or alive, for wrecking a family already devastated by the death of her husband from colon cancer when the children were 6 and 3.

But Katie was different.

Katie had given up on her older brother.

By the time she was 20, she hadn’t spoken to Dan in a few years, and she had reconciled herself to the idea that his addiction would kill him.

Now, she was sitting across the table at the Greek restaurant he had taken her to after Friday night services at Beit T’Shuvah, the recovery facility where he was living. He had been out of prison and sober for more than a year.

Katie remembers Dan’s voice quivering when he told her he was sorry.

Sorry for bringing drugs and shady people into their home; sorry for stealing the money she had earned at Domino’s Pizza and was saving for her trip to Europe after high school; sorry for preoccupying their mother, for making her keep his secrets, for missing her childhood.

Sorry for not being her big brother.

Katie sat in the restaurant sobbing.

Katie and Dan both know it wasn’t that 10-minute apology that made them the best friends they are today. But that acknowledgement more than a year ago opened up a conversation and process that couldn’t have happened without the words “I’m sorry.”

“My resentment for him was so intense and passionate that, if it wasn’t for the way that an apology neutralizes a situation, I think I would still hold all those things in my heart,” said Katie, now 22 and a philosophy major at UCLA. “I think I would still hold some grudge toward him for never recognizing the truth and the severity of the situation that his addiction caused in our family.”

Apologies hold the power to transform individuals, to restore relationships, to move people forward rather than leaving them stuck in the past.

Perhaps that is why apologies and forgiveness are so central to the High Holy Days, the most intense time of introspection on the Jewish calendar.

Over and over in the High Holy Days liturgy, Jews ask God for forgiveness and praise God as forgiving and merciful. The liturgy is meant to inspire repentance, and to bring worshippers to emulate God by actively participating in a culture of forgiveness. The 30 days before Rosh Hashanah and then the 10 days following, culminating in Yom Kippur, are designated for preparing for divine forgiveness by asking for human forgiveness.

The holiday’s earthly application can be compelling even for those who can’t connect to an image of God as judge in the sky before the open Book of Life.

“A good portion of the liturgy is about you getting to play God and holding yourself accountable,” said Rabbi Irwin Kula, an author and speaker on spirituality, and president of Clal — The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership in New York.

“If you understand that this is a place of judgment internally, if you can locate where to judge yourself, you’ll get to a better place and become more forgiving yourself.”

Having to directly admit offenses to another human being gives concrete form to the abstract ideas of honesty, humility and empathy. 

“This concept of seeking forgiveness is a very wholesome concept, it’s a chastening concept,” said Rabbi Jacob Pressman, rabbi emeritus at Temple Beth Am in Los Angeles. “It gets you off your high horse of infallibility and allows you to admit to yourself and to others, ‘I’m not infallible.’ ”

Recognizing shortcomings can help make people more tolerant of others’ foibles or transgressions and, ideally, creates human interaction with less strife.

“Basically, what an apology does is it puts you back on an even keel. When you have dissed a person, you are saying you are above that person. Now we have to create equality again,” said Kula, author of “Yearnings: Embracing the Sacred Messiness of Life” (2006), and host of the 2003 public television series “Simple Wisdom.”

Of course, apologizing is hard.

“Admitting offenses is self-diminishing to an extent. People don’t like to face the fact that they’re nasty or have lied or stolen, and asking forgiveness is a confession of an inadequacy,” Pressman said.

But Katie Rope understands that any humiliation is washed away by the relief an apology brings to both parties.

“Apologies are so crucial for loving someone, you don’t ever need to feel ashamed for apologizing because it’s such a healing experience and takes so much courage to do,” she said.

The fact that human connectedness is at the center of what is supposed to be one of the most ethereally focused times of year is no accident.

True paths to Teshuvah Read More »

The nature of forgiveness

Hazzan Judy Greenfeld has spent much of her life thinking about forgiveness.

In December 1975, when she was 16, her parents were held up in an inner-city Cleveland parking structure after seeing a play with some friends. The assailants were three teenage boys with a sawed-off shotgun, and the one holding the gun panicked. He shot her father, and he died immediately.

Greenfeld, her four siblings and her mother were so immobilized by the pain and shock, it took them a year just to be able to move, she said. Each Friday night and each holiday brought a fresh wave of grief.

Greenfeld doesn’t know what she would do if she ran into the murderer, who was sentenced to a juvenile detention center and then a few years in prison.

“Part of me felt like, why do these kids get to live? They should be dead. These boys should know who they killed,” said Greenfeld, who founded the Nachshon Minyan, a spiritual and educational community in Encino.

For decades, Greenfeld has done the psychological and spiritual work necessary to move on with her life.

“If someone really hurts you or ruins your life, there is this sense that if you forgive them, they are not going to pay, and they’re not going to really feel what you felt. There is a desire for somebody to be as pained as you are,” she said. “Well, we don’t get to do that, because the truth is we don’t have control over that.”

So Greenfeld reconceptualized what forgiveness means, parsing the word to derive a nuance that has led her to spiritual healing.

“I turned the word ‘forgiving’ into ‘for giving’ to God to take care of. When I do that, it puts me into a place where I can release myself of the personal responsibility of having to bring someone to justice. The true healing of forgiveness is that it releases you,” she said. 

Greenfeld has devised a meditation to help visualize the process of forgiveness, which she says works for offenses mundane or life-altering. 

She pictures the offense — in her case, the murderers — and imagines an electrical cord extending from her solar plexus out to these boys. The energy is draining from her and going to them.

“I have something that weakens me and is so painful. It is the energy that runs from me to that picture, that scene. Part of the work is untying myself from that energetic cord, so that I can pull my energy back to me,” she said.

For smaller offenses, it might just be a thin thread that needs snipping. For larger offenses, it might be a cable of twisted wires.

“I have to cut that cable. And all those little fibers, all the little wires hanging out, I have to smooth them, and then pull that cable back into my own heart to re-empower myself,” she said.

“And what I have found is that when I take it into that realm, I’m released. I don’t know if I can tell you, if I ever saw these men, what I would do, and I can’t tell you that I feel there is justice in the world. But I know I have been able to live my life and turn it into good, which is what I feel teshuvah (repentance) is — being able to bring good where there has been something that isn’t good.”

Rabbi Isaiah Zeldin, rabbi emeritus at Stephen S. Wise Temple, said his years on the pulpit and working with people has led him to believe that it is forgiving, and not apologizing, that is at the core of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur.

“I’ve discovered that worshippers always look upon the High Holy Days as a wonderful therapy session, because they know they can begin with a new slate. But I would like the emphasis to be that the worshipper, in his or her relationships, lets the other have a new slate. And that is why one of the most important commandants is, ‘Thou shall not bear a grudge,” Zeldin said.

People who are forgiving recognize their own faults and thus empathize with others, according to Rabbi Mark Borovitz, founder and director of Beit T’Shuvah, a residential recovery facility in Culver City.

“The only person who would rebuff teshuvah is someone who needs to be angry, and it’s just really sad,” he said. “Some people are addicted to being miserable.”

Rabbi Irwin Kula, president of Clal — The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership, and an author and speaker on spiritual and interpersonal issues, said those who are unable to forgive need to look inside themselves.

“Generally speaking, I find the inability to forgive somebody else has to do with that person internally not forgiving themselves, or not having been forgiven for something they did,” he said, noting that it is specific to each case. “Until it creates some kind of anxiety that undermines the person’s way of being in the world, there is nothing much you can do,” he said.

Of course, there are some transgressions and betrayals that are so deep, they can’t be forgiven.

“Sometimes we hurt people so deeply, that the brokenness, at least in the near term, is irreparable, and then we live with it. Brokenness is part of life,” Kula said.

Jewish sources require one who is apologizing to make three sincere attempts. If after three attempts the apology is rebuffed, the wrongdoer is absolved.

Of course, divine absolution might do little to heal someone whose apology goes unaccepted.

“One thing you may feel is grief. What you’re expecting is to reattach to the person, and the grief is that the person will not be who you wish them to be,” said Wendy Mogel, a psychologist and author of the forthcoming “The Blessing of a B Minus.”

There are shades of gray on the forgiveness spectrum. You can forgive someone but not have an interest in continuing the relationship, according to Rabbi Elliot Dorff, rector and professor of philosophy at the American Jewish University. Or, you can reconcile without forgiving — he points to America and Japan, following the mutually destructive deeds of World War II. Or, you can offer a pardon, so the person is not absolved of guilt, but no longer has to suffer the punishment.

What Greenfeld understands is that finding some way to resolve enmity between people helps both parties.

“When people are really tired, I ask them to look at the resentments in their life, because resentments drain you,” she said.

“In the end, you have to ask the question, how do we want to continue to bring goodness into the world? Forgiveness allows us an opportunity to move forward.”

The nature of forgiveness Read More »

The Anti-Americanism of Opposition to the Islamic Center

Each year or so, I teach a seminar in American Jewish History. Early in the semester I read with the students George Washington’s exchange of letter in 1791, two years after the Constitution as written. with the Hebrew Congregation in Newport. The first President of the United States wrote the following:

“It is now no more that toleration is spoken of as if it were the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights, for, happily, the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.”

Let us face it that those who criticize the construction of the Mosque in the neighborhood of Ground Zero are violating an essential American value. The right to religious freedom from regarded from the inception of this country as a natural right, requiring no tolerance for the other. The one requirement that Washington explained was that “they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.”

We do have the right to demand of all who live in the United States that they demean themselves as good citizens and offer the country their effectual support.

It was unwise and frankly un-American for my friend Abraham Foxman to place ADL in opposition to the creation of the Islamic Cultural Center.

First of all Jews should remember that there was a time when we could not build a synagogue in the very area in question. Secondly, the history of American religion is that religious leaders come to understand that in order to participate in American society, the ultimately have to adopt the American norm of interreligious civility. We all have a stake in the development of “moderate” Moslem leadership, leadership that wants to be effective in American culture and in order to do so speak an American language and not the language of the Islamacists who are pushing for radicalization in the Middle East and elsewhere. And finally, Christianity and Islam have been rivals for more than a millennia. Judaism and Islam are not rivals. Theologically Islam with its belief in one God is far more acceptable to Jews than Christianity and its Trinitarian concepts and for centuries Jews lived far more comfortable in Islamic countries than in Christian ones. We should have stayed out of this fight or merely reaffirmed George Washington’s pledge to the Jews of Newport, his pledge and his insistence people who live under the protection of this government should demean themselves as good citizens.

No Moslem institution in this country will be under greater scrutiny than the cultural center that is about to be constructed and it could become a model of how an American Muslim culture can develop, an institution of healing and education.

Furthermore, Jews have an absolute interest in the development of a more moderate Islam. Israel cannot be at war with all of Islam. Egypt and Jordan have made peace with Israel. Many Moslem countries have economic ties. India has a long Muslim minority and is an important economic partner for Israel. And the list goes on and on.

We are now seeing the slippery slope from opposition to a Muslim Cultural Center to the burning of a Mosque in Tennessee and opposition to their construction elsewhere, to the burning of the Koran and inflaming tensions elsewhere.

Self professed conservatives should be especially horrified to see that there is little enthusiasm among their ideological soul mates to conserve this most basic and more vaunted to American values.

Simply put much of the rhetoric I am hearing is anti-American plain and simple, anti the values that have made America a revered symbol of freedom.

 

 

 

The Anti-Americanism of Opposition to the Islamic Center Read More »