fbpx

July 19, 2010

Tom Friedman’s Soft Spot for Terrorist Fadlallah

It wasn’t all that surprising to hear that Britain’s Ambassador to Lebanon, Frances Guy, publicly mourned the death of the arch-terrorist and spiritual head of Hezbollah, Sheikh Muhammad Hussein Fadlallah. After all, Britain is the country whom, we now know, did a deal with Muammar Kaddafi in 2007 to grant BP oil drilling rights in return for the release of the Lockerbie bomber, the worst mass murderer in British legal history.

Still, Guy’s praise for the terrorist, describing him as someone who made you into a better human being, seems unhinged. “I remember well, when I was nominated ambassador to Beirut, a Muslim acquaintance sought me out to tell me how lucky I was because I would get a chance to meet Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah. Truly he was right…You knew you would leave his presence feeling a better person. That for me is the real effect of a true man of religion; leaving an impact on everyone he meets, no matter what their faith… If I was sad to hear the news I know other peoples’ lives will be truly blighted. The world needs more men like him.”

Hmmm.

Tell that to the families of the 300 American Marines and Embassy personnel who were killed in a massive suicide truck bomb attack in 1983 that Fadlallah personally sanctioned. Tell it also to the families of the Western hostages of the 1980’s in Lebanon who were kidnapped and lost years of their lives at Fadlallah’s command. Tell it especially to the Israeli civilians who have lived and died under Hezbollah’s rockets from Lebanon, all authorized by Fadlallah. Just imagine what would have happened to Guy had she publicly lamented the death of an unrepentant IRA terrorist who murdered hundreds of British civilians and then died peacefully in his sleep. Does Britain make a policy of employing Ambassadors who are certifiable?

But even more puzzling is the New York Times column about Fadlallah penned by Tom Friedman, a man for the whom the line between right and wrong is increasingly blurred by the day.

Recall that three weeks ago Friedman wrote a column accusing Israel of employing ‘Hamah rules’ in Gaza, thereby comparing a thriving democracy battling Hamas, a terrorist organization that fired thousands of rockets at its citizens, to a bloodthirsty tyrant in Syria who mowed his people down with tanks when they dared rise up against his brutal regime.

Now, in his column on Fadlallah, Friedman begins by condemning CNN for firing its senior editor for Middle East affairs, Octavia Nasr, after she tweeted that she was ‘sad to hear of the passing of’ Fadlallah, adding for good measure that the terrorist was ‘one of Hezbollah’s giants I respect a lot.’ Friedman concedes that Nasr’s posting was ‘troubling,’ but not because she lamented the death of a terrorist but because ‘reporters covering a beat’ undermine their credibility when they ‘issue condolences’ for the people they cover.

If that amorality weren’t wacky enough, Friedman then begins to personally praise Fadlallah, quoting Richard Norton of Boston University who said that Fadlallah supported women and ‘was not afraid to speak about sexuality,’ adding that ‘he even once gave [a mosque sermon] about sexual urges and female masturbation.’

In the long line of recent bizarre columns by Friedman, this won wins a prize.

For the record I too am a cleric who writes about sexuality. My book “Kosher Sex” has appeared in seventeen languages throughout the world and its follow up, “The Kosher Sutra,” was likewise a best-seller. Having been raised by a single mother and as the father of six daughters, I too am a strong advocate for women. But I have a sneaking suspicion that if I were the spiritual head of a genocidal terrorist movement who publicly preached about the need for more suicide bombs against children then notwithstanding how many lectures I might give about masturbation it would not save me from being seen as a monster. Friedman’s train has simply left the tracks.

But lest you conclude that the three-time Pulitzer-prize winner has lost all sense of morality and has lost the ability to condemn murder, he does confess that Fadlallah “was not a social worker. He had some dark side.” Well now, Tom, you don’t say. Really?

Dark side, Tom, is Mel Gibson who is a racist and misogynist. But even Mel hasn’t killed anyone or advocated that civilians be blown up (at least not yet). But here is Fadlallah in a 2002 interview with The Daily Telegraph: “I was not the one who launched the idea of so-called suicide bombings, but I have certainly argued in favor of them…. [the Palestinians] are in a state of war with Israel. They are not aiming to kill civilians but, in war, civilians do get killed…” Fadlallah is, of course, lying through his teeth as the first target of a suicide attacker is civilians which is why, after the Mercaz HaRav massacre in Jerusalem of 6 March, 2008, when a Palestinian gunman walked into a Yeshiva and shot eight Rabbinical students dead, Fadlallah called the attack “heroic”. While some Imams courageously ruled that suicide bombings were against Islamic law, Fadlallah defended the religious basis for these terrorist attacks to The Daily Star.

The State Department officially classified Fadlallah a terrorist and, according to Bob Woodward, it was the CIA who, in 1985, was behind an attempt to kill Fadlallah with a car bomb in Beirut.

Fortunately, not all journalists have abandoned reason when it comes to Fadlallah. The London Telegraph’s executive foreign editor Con Coughlin wrote of Fadlallah, “When you look back at his track record you can see he was right up there with other infamous terror masterminds, such as Abu Nidal and Carlos the Jackal.”

I recently wrote that Tom Friedman is often difficult to read because he seems enraptured with his own genius. But nothing excuses a level of arrogance that rewrites the Western world’s most cherished values, among which ‘Do not murder’ is the most simple and basic.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach hosts ‘The Shmuley Show’ on 77 WABC, in New York City. He is the founder of This World: The Values Network, and has just published, “Renewal: A Guide to the Values-Filled Life.” Follow him on Twitter @RabbiShmuley. 

Tom Friedman’s Soft Spot for Terrorist Fadlallah Read More »

How Many Members of the Tribe Are Family?

Counting is an important concept for Jews.  We count the Omer in the lead-up to Shavuot.  In Numbers, the Israelites are commanded to conduct a census.  As someone who does a lot of number crunching as her day job, I’m intrigued by the counting we can (and cannot) do of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) communities.

The most frequently asked question I get is, “How many gay (or lesbian, or bisexual, or transgender) people are there?”  And, unfortunately, it isn’t an easy question to answer.  Very few surveys ask about sexual orientation and even fewer ask about gender identity.  Much of the counting we do comes to the US Census, which only lets us identify same-sex couples who live together.  From those figures, there are about half a million same-sex couples in the US.  Another survey tells us that about 4.1% of the adult population identifies at LGB – so that’s about 9 million people.  And there are no good statistics about the number of transgender people in the US.

What about Jews?  Anecdotally, it seems like a lot of Jews identify as LGBT.  As my mom says of my own hometown and the stories the other Jewish moms tell about their LGBT kids, “There must have been something in the water!”  Los Angeles has had as many as two LGBT temples and several LGBT Jewish organizations.  What does the data say about The Tribe and how queer we really are?

Fortunately for someone like me who loves data, there’s a big survey that comes in handy in answering this question.  The General Social Survey asks Americans lots of questions – including questions about sexual orientation and religion.  In 2008, 12.6% of Jewish respondents identified as lesbian, gay, or bisexual.  That is nearly 7.5 times as many Protestants and more than 8 times as many Catholics. 

The General Social Survey can’t tell us why higher numbers of Jews identify as LGBT. 

Is that Jews who identify as LGBT don’t feel as alienated from their faith as those raised in Catholic or Muslim homes, so LGBT Jews are more likely to continue to identify as Jewish instead of running from religion?  Perhaps. 

It is that LGBT identified non-Jews see the affirming aspects of Judaism and become Jews-by-Choice?  Perhaps. 

But, the “why” isn’t as important as the “how.” 

How can we make the Jewish community as welcoming and affirming of LGBT Jews as possible?  How can such Jews feel valued?  How can we ensure that LGBT Jews feel counted?

How Many Members of the Tribe Are Family? Read More »

Thank You, Robert Gibbs

If Robert Gibbs hadn’t said that Democrats may lose the House in November, then House Democrats might not have been so infuriated that the president himself had to travel to Capitol Hill to let them vent.

And if Obama hadn’t personally heard how enraged they are by Senate Republicans, and how galled they’ve been by the White House’s clueless kumbayas, then he might not have come to his senses in his weekly address on Saturday, when he drove a stake through the heart of the post-partisan vampire that has possessed him since his election.

It wasn’t an angry talk.  He used the same level voice that has enabled the “professorial” put-down to be attached to him by his critics.  Nevertheless he made a merciless, convincing case that cynical filibustering by Mitch McConnell’s disciplined minority is the enemy of economic recovery. 

He hammered Senate Republicans for using procedural tactics to block up-or-down votes on his plans to boost lending to small businesses, and to give them tax incentives to hire workers, buy equipment and expand their companies. 

He nailed the Republicans for standing in the way of extending unemployment insurance, and for retailing the canard that a few hundred dollars a week will transform jobless Americans into welfare queens.

He drove home the point that people out of work will spend unemployment benefits quickly, which will do more to boost local economies than the Republican answer to everything: more tax cuts for the rich. 

It was so simple and effective a take-no-prisoners case that it raises the question: What took you so long, Mr. President?

If you listened to Joe Biden on ABC’s Sunday show “This Week,” you’d think that the White House’s real difficulty has been that wheezy workhorse, a communications problem – their message’s inability to break through to the beleaguered American people, who “don’t know a lot of what’s going on.”  Yep, we have to do a better job telling our story: the universal faux mea culpa of low-polling politicians. 

To be sure, this Administration could be doing a way better job touting successes like health care and Wall Street reform.  Whatever those acts’ shortcomings are – and the ones on my list aren’t trivial – they still represent historic accomplishments. 

But I have no doubt that Obama and Senate Democrats would have had to bargain away much less – would have split differences from a position of strength, in the middle, instead of on the far right where they’d permitted the Republicans to drag the center – if only the White House had had the guts back then, instead of just now, to label McConnell’s tactics for what they really were, and if only Democrats had enforced a comparable discipline on the hapless ersatz statesmen in their own caucus. 

The alleged desire of independent voters to “get beyond the partisan bickering” is a fairy-tale, promulgated by chin pullers who have never worked in a campaign and by pollsters whose survey questions are worded to make it as impossible to profess skepticism about the dream of a peaceable political kingdom as to say you dislike apple pie. 

I’d argue that if Obama and Senate Democrats – instead of effectively inviting Olympia Snowe, Chuck Grassley, Joe Lieberman and Max Baucus to grab them by the short hairs – had lived up to their 2008 mandate, exercised their power, drawn a line in the sand around core principles, and given their partisan base something to bark and bite about, their legislative achievements would have been more impressive than the record they have now, and their success (or even their lack of it) would have warranted the political price they’re already paying anyway.   

In a throwaway line on “This Week,” on his way to explaining the Administration’s frustration, Biden referred to Senate Republicans as “a bunch of guys, who are good guys, but….”  That’s the animating folklore of the Senate: the collegiality of good, serious people who at the end of the day simply want to do right by the country.  In truth, it’s less a mythology than a pathology, and both Biden and Obama had ample opportunity to drink that Kool-Aid when they served there. 

I hope that Biden’s saying that was no more than a courtly flourish, or at worst an atavism he’s working to overcome.  And I hope that Obama’s Saturday address turns out to be more than a one-off. 

The bum hand he was dealt when he took office accounts for some of what’s pulling Obama down.  So does some bad luck, and what chief-of-staff Rahm Emanuel calls “the G force” – the oil spill in the gulf, the debt crisis in Greece, and the aftermath of Israel’s attack on a flotilla determined to break its Gaza blockade.  But it’s not bad advice that’s been hurting Obama.  With presidents, it never is.  His standing, and his party’s prospects, will depend on how tenaciously he can hold on to what he seems to have learned from the House Democrats riled up by his press secretary: that he can do more for the country not by holding hands with Mitch McConnell around the campfire, but by taking names and kicking butt the way FDR did. 

Marty Kaplan is the Norman Lear professor of entertainment, media and society at the USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism.  Reach him at martyk@jewishjournal.com.

Thank You, Robert Gibbs Read More »

Iron Dome defense system passes last tests

The Iron Dome missile defense system successfully completed its final round of tests, Israel’s Defense Ministry said.

The tests, which include intercepting simultaneous rocket salvoes from different directions, were completed Monday in the Negev Desert.

Israel’s Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd. has built two systems thus far; Israel has not decided how many it will order. The systems are expected to be put into operation in November.

The system has been shown to be able to intercept the kind of rockets used against Israel by Palestinian terrorists in Gaza and by Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Iron Dome was initiated after the Second Lebanon War in 2006 and the Gaza war in winter 2008-09, when Israeli border towns were hostage to the barrages of rockets.

The system is portable and can be moved quickly.

Iron Dome defense system passes last tests Read More »

With hiring of AJC veteran, David Project consolidates its mainstream status

In a continuing bid to transition from campus rabble rousers to more mainstream educators, The David Project has hired a Jewish establishment veteran to guide the pro-Israel campus organization.

In recent years The David Project has expanded from its original mission—confronting what it identified as radically anti-Israel groups on campus—to educating Jewish students on Israel.

Now the hiring of David Bernstein, 43, a 13-year veteran of the American Jewish Committee, as executive director signals a major growing-up for the organization.

“I’m looking forward to going from the premier Jewish advocacy organization globally to an organization with a more focused approach and mission,” Bernstein told JTA. “The idea is to train the activists, who will then have the skill set to talk to the wider campus community.”

The David Project made its first major splash in 2004 with “Columbia Unbecoming,” a hard-hitting documentary film alleging that pro-Israel students at Columbia University were being intimidated by faculty and peers. Critics said the film, by naming faculty, was itself an exercise in intimidation.

In 2006 and 2007, the Boston-based organization joined an effort to keep a Muslim group that had alleged extremist ties from building a mosque in that city.

More recently, The David Project has focused instead on helping students introduce a pro-Israel narrative on campuses where the organization believes it is absent.

In addition to campus training and national training in the United States and Israel to equip students with the tools to counter anti-Israel activism on campus, the organization contributes curricula to more than 125 Jewish middle schools and high schools. Meanwhile, the staff has grown to 28 from just a handful.

The David Project was at the forefront earlier this year of the Israel on Campus Coalition effort to push back against a stepped-up effort by anti-Israel groups to depict the Jewish state as an apartheid state.

“It’s less about the staff being the advocates; it’s more about the students being trained to being the advocates,” said Evan Bernstein, the director of development for the group. (Bernstein is not related to the new executive director.) “We’re the building blocks for them to get that courage.”

The pro-Israel student community welcomed the hiring of David Bernstein, who until now directed the AJC’s network of regional offices. Bernstein will split his work between Boston and Washington, where he will continue to reside.

“I’m extremely excited by the appointment,” said Wayne Firestone, the president of Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life.

Firestone said The David Project fills a vacuum among pro-Israel student groups, which often limit their activities to bringing speakers to campus or running candidates in student elections.

“They have a niche approach to education that certainly is not the focal point of AIPAC, which is involved in political engagement,” he said, referring to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s student division.

Firestone said the David Project’s focus on small, relaxed groups was effective.

“That’s the battleground for influencing this generation,” he said. “It’s very hard to influence public opinion on speaker tours. You need more than knowledge and information. You need local stakeholders in educating and influencing their peers.”

With the only material on The David Project’s recommended reading list addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict being uniformly critical of the Palestinian Authority leadership, which some left and center-left pro-Israel groups see as moderate, Bernstein suggested that he would broaden the dialogue under his stewardship.

“We will provide resources that help people have thoughtful, sophisticated conversations as issues emerge—on longstanding issues and controversies as well as short-term ones,” he said. “We will be making sure that we address the range of opinions from left to right, we will make sure people understand the complexities Israel faces.”

Firestone said the broader Israel on Campus Coalition would continue to accommodate the view of the liberal side of the spectrum.

“In the Jewish world the marketplace of ideas is rich and cantankerous,” the Hillel leader said. “That means the more niches we can bring together, the better.”

With hiring of AJC veteran, David Project consolidates its mainstream status Read More »

Tisha B’Av at the Western Wall

Tisha B’Av at the Western Wall Read More »

Jewish group runs ad criticizing Glenn Beck

More than 250 rabbis, Christian clergy, Jewish leaders and other supporters signed on to a Jewish Funds for Justice ad criticizing Glenn Beck’s comments about the organization.

The ad, which appeared in the most recent edition of the Forward, was part of an ongoing feud between the conservative Fox TV host and Jewish Funds for Justice.

On his May 28 show, Beck read comments from a Washington Post column by Jewish Funds for Justice President Simon Greer, who wrote that “government makes our country function. To put God first is to put humankind first. To put humankind first is to put the common good first.”

Beck said this logic led to the Holocaust.

“This leads to death camps,” he said. “A Jew, of all people, should know that. This is exactly the kind of talk that led to the death camps in Germany.”

The ad responded that “In the wake of this attack on our shared values, we are grateful to so many leaders for standing with us. Because of your support, Jewish Funds for Justice can continue to speak out against this kind of demagoguery and advocate for real solutions to the pressing challenges facing millions of Americans.”

Jewish Funds for Justice had targeted Beck previously with a Twitter campaign in which people tweeted haikus about social justice to Beck.

Jewish group runs ad criticizing Glenn Beck Read More »

LUCK VS SKILL

                                                      LUCK VS SKILL

The references to Luck abound in our idiomatic language—Lucky Louie, the Luck of the Irish, Lady Luck, he/she’s got all the Luck, Lucky in Love, etc., etc., etc.

What is Luck?  Fate?  The Law of Averages? Randomness?? I don’t have an answer. In Mah Jongg, I have heard it said by countless numbers of people the game is all Luck.  As a teacher of the game and a player of the game, I beg to differ.  The game is not all Luck.

Yes, Luck, or whatever you want to call it, plays a part, especially when you first take a peek at your tiles.  You have no control over that aspect of the game.  But from there on you do have a great deal of control.  It’s your ability and skill and sometimes guile that controls the choices you make about all the other aspects of the game –from what tiles you pass in the Charleston, what tiles you keep, what hand to pursue, whether or not to change your hand and to which hand, the discards you make, the Exposures, whether you play defensively, and so on.

To prove my point that skills play a greater role than Luck in Mah Jongg, I note that there are players who generally win, fairly consistently. People refer to them—they a say   “She’s a great player”.  What makes a “great” player? It can’t be just Luck.  We’ve all experienced the fleeting nature of Luck.

It must be something else. It is. It’s the number one skill—a thorough knowledge of the hands on the card.  There are many players who can play quite successfully without referring to the card. Yes, they mostly memorize the hands.  They are able to accurately assess what information the Exposures of others reveal and modify their play accordingly. They keep a very close account of the discards, and are fully aware of the nuances of their opponents.  And they play a strong defensive game, which some players describe as “tough”.  Mah Jongg is very competitive—you do everything you can to win and everything you can to keep the others from winning.  That’s the challenge of the game and what makes it such fun to win and such dismay when you lose.  And, last, but not the least, there’s Experience, which some say is the best teacher….

Even as I believe the skills a player possesses is the most important factor in winning, there’s a little voice inside that says
MAY THE TILES BE WITH YOU!

 

LUCK VS SKILL Read More »

Majority of Israelis to mark Tisha B’Av

Some 22 percent of Israelis will fast on Tisha B’Av and another 52 percent will refrain from going out with friends, according to a new poll.

Tisha B’Av, which begins at sundown Monday and lasts for 25 hours, is a day of fasting and lamentation marking the destruction of the First and Second Holy Temples in Jerusalem.

Recreational spots are closed on Tisha B’Av according to law, which 18 percent of poll respondents called “religious coercion.”

The Ynet-Gesher poll surveyed 505 Hebrew-speaking Jewish Israelis. It has a margin of error of 4.4 percent.

As Jewish tradition says that the Temple was destroyed because of baseless hatred, the poll asked which groups are the most hated in Israeli society. Fifty-four of respondents answered Arabs, 37 percent named the haredi Orthodox, 8 percent religious and 1 percent Tel Avivians.

Some 42 percent of respondents said they believed that the religious-secular issue is the worst source of tension in Israeli society, while 41 percent said it was the Jewish-Arab situation. Another 9 percent said the worst source of tension is between settlers and the rest of the country, while 8 percent said it was the tension between rich and poor.

Majority of Israelis to mark Tisha B’Av Read More »

The message of Yud B’Av

As we approach the 9th of Av, we have been considering what the message of the 9th of Av is for us, as people working with individuals and communities that have suffered great disasters. 

At first we thought that the message was one of commiseration: The survivors of hurricanes, floods, and other disasters, have suffered a great loss; we, too, have suffered a great loss, one that we commemorate even today, 2,000 years later. 

But the more we thought about it, the more we realized that the message we needed to learn from Thisha B’Av was not about the 9th of Av at all.  We needed to learn the message of the Tenth of Av (Yud B’Av). 

Yud B’Av is a day of hope. It is the day when someone comes out into the rubble and lifts the first stone.  It is a day still tinged with sadness, when we remember the destruction that has befallen us—but at the same time, it is the day we begin to look forward, knowing that there will be a tomorrow that will be better than today. 

Communities that have been hit by disasters need many things on their Yud B’Av. They need the basics (food, water, shelter), they need manpower (contractors, plumbers, roofers, volunteers), and they need materials. But one thing that is often over looked after a disaster is the need for hope. 

We at the JDRC try to bring the message of Yud B’Av to communities affected by disasters.  We come in the day after devastation, to pick up the first stone. We don’t just tell the community that there will be a brighter tomorrow—we show them, by rolling up our sleeves and working with them to help them get there.

The message of Yud B’Av Read More »