fbpx

July 13, 2010

The Symbolism of ‘Stones’

An orchestral anthem fades into church bells as a dim stage light focuses on an inert group of six human “stones.” Slathered head to toe — hair, faces, hands, clothing, shoes —in Dead Sea mud, the performers stand as still as statues. Slowly, the innocuous clanging bells shift to the threatening sound of marching boots. The haunting whistle of a train, its metallic wheels rubbing rails in a tinny screech, is interspersed with gunfire. In the distance, a baby begins to wail. Doors creak. Bombers circle overhead. Unknown voices whisper incomprehensibly as the stones slowly reveal the skin-colored numbers scratched into their forearms.

“Stones,” this wordless piece created by the Israeli Orto-Da Theatre Group, is not just another dramatization of concentration camp horrors. Filled with historical, cultural, metaphorical and symbolic references, it is also a commentary on contemporary society, interspersed with comic relief and a hopeful vision of the human spirit’s ability to overcome even the darkest hours of existence.

Inspired by Nathan Rappaport’s 1948 sculpture commemorating Jewish warriors in the Warsaw Ghetto — and carved from granite blocks that Hitler originally intended to use as his monument glorifying the Third Reich’s imminent victory over Europe — “Stones” is rife with irony and provocation.

“I was in Warsaw doing a show called ‘Meta-Rabin’ and I had some extra time while touring, so I went to see the Warsaw Ghetto. As soon as I saw Rappaport’s monument, I felt a strange urge to make it alive,” explained Yinon Tzafrir, who created “Stones” along with Avi Gibson Bar-El and Daniel Zafrani. “Whether it was by chance or mystic power, that was where the idea originated. From there it took some time to develop, and I would say it’s still evolving.”

Best known for theater that draws upon a large variety of styles, the name Orto-Da literally means “light” and “thank you.” Tzafrir says it also references the company’s desire to fuse traditional theater with postmodern practices. The result is a multisensory journey that travels from the concentration camps in Germany to the first immigration waves in Palestine; from the early days of Israel’s statehood to the disenchantment of the kibbutz movement; from the burgeoning of television in 1980s Israel to the 1990s techno club culture. The piece is teeming with symbols that can be interpreted in numerous ways, some more obvious than others: A waterless shower sounds like seeping gas; the clacking train transporting Jews to concentration camps; the German orders being shouted over crackling loudspeakers; the warriors’ communal grief at the suffocation of a baby in order to keep it quiet in hiding.

Other symbols provide comic relief. The Muppets make a delightful appearance to sing their theme song together. Bob Marley sings “Exodus” as the infamous ship ofthe same name struggles to enter Palestinein 1947.

Other references, while thought-provoking, remain somewhat more enigmatic. A giant Lycra Hitler, controlled by the warrior stones, gives orders to inhale and exhale in the voice of a yoga master with a distinctly Indian accent. Moments later, he orders “the children of the night to step into the light” as a techno song begins its syncopated beat. Aside from the somewhat disturbingly comic image, a single message is hard to fathom. Perhaps it is a warning about carefully choosing who to follow and why. Or it could be a confirmation that the warriors now control Hitler, and the Jews are no longer afraid of him — even if he is larger than life and as flexible as a yoga master.

“I didn’t intend to make it lightor heavy,” Tzafrir explained. “It wasa strong urge to turn this monument into people of the past coming into the present to contrast with contemporary times andto say something about the morality of these times. There is a lot of meaning in each picture, and people understand different things.”

Overall, it is a dreamlike, sensory experience in which anything a human imagination can conjure might suddenly appear. Despite the limitations of six characters in extremely close quarters on a fixed stage with thick makeup and slight capacities for movement, its complexity and depth are remarkable.

At the second annual California International Theatre Festival, July 17-25, Orto-Da will present its American premiere of the work.

“This piece absolutely speaks to the triumph of the human spirit in adversity, and that’s our theme for this year,” festival director Linda Purl explained in a phone interview. “I also love the topic. It has a most unusual blend of something very serious with wonderful flares of comedy. And, visually, I think it’s stunning.”
For this year’s theatrical lineup, Purl has traveled from Transylvania to Mexico, from Moscow to Bogota, putting her finger on the pulse of what she describes as theater’s “collective consciousness.”

“The conversations and the common issues we struggle with as humans remain the same,” she noted. “Will we survive? Is there a God? How can we come to terms with death?”

Ultimately, “Stones” does make you think, and this, Tzafrir said, was exactly the point.

“It’s a journey about stones, and when you are a stone, you don’t really understand everything. You have questions. To be in this state of mind is also good for humankind because when you know everything and you have all the answers and you say, ‘I know why I’m here; I know what this is about,’ then you get nervous and you go to war quickly.

“But when you question, your spirit is more open and you can learn more and develop,” he explained. “This is also why I don’t like to use words. They are limited, and when you don’t use words, you can reach feelings, imaginations and thoughts.”

The American premiere of Orto-Da’s “Stones” is July 17 at 8 p.m. and July 18 at 5 p.m. at the Carlson Family Theater at Viewpoint School in Calabasas.  For more information about the festival and to purchase tickets, call 1-800-351-2766 or visit: www.citfestival.org.

The Symbolism of ‘Stones’ Read More »

Opponents alarmed as Israeli conversion bill moves ahead

Opponents of a controversial bill that could give the Orthodox Rabbinate the final say over conversions in Israel are trying to keep the bill from moving ahead in the Israeli Knesset after its surprise introduction and passage by a Knesset committee.

For months, Israeli lawmakers have been discussing a bill that would put more power over conversion into the hands of Israel’s Orthodox-dominated Rabbinate by giving local rabbis the ability to perform conversions and giving the Chief Rabbinate oversight and control over the whole process.

The bill, sponsored by Yisrael Beiteinu Knesset member David Rotem, gained steam Monday with its approval in the Knesset law committee by a 5-4 vote. The bill now must pass three readings before the full Knesset to become law.

Opponents are desperately trying to stall the process, at least until the Knesset starts a two-month break next week.

“They have to bring it to the Knesset now for a first reading, and we have to make sure that it will not happen,” the chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel, Natan Sharansky, told JTA.

Sharansky is leading a coalition against the bill that includes the leaders of the North American Jewish federation system and the non-Orthodox Jewish religious movements in the United States.

Rotem’s bill originally was intended to ease the conversion process within Israel and make it easier for non-Jewish Israelis of Soviet extraction to obtain conversions and marry within Israel.

Despite its intent, opponents warned that the bill would consolidate control over conversions in the office of the Chief Rabbinate and drive a wedge between Israel and the Diaspora by carrying the risk that non-Orthodox conversions performed in the Diaspora could be discounted in Israel. In addition, they said the bill would affect the eligibility of converts for the Law of Return, which grants the right to Israeli citizenship to anyone who is Jewish or at least has one Jewish grandparent.

The opponents urged Rotem to revise the proposal. They believed they had a deal in place with Rotem to hold off on the bill pending more discussion after Rotem came to the United States in April to discuss the bill with them, and after a number of meetings between Sharansky and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Several top Israeli officials, including the justice minister and minister for Diaspora affairs, had agreed to work with Sharansky on altering the bill.

But Rotem caught Sharansky and the Diaspora leaders by surprise by bringing the bill to a committee vote this week; Sharansky was given only a day’s warning. The move set off a maelstrom of criticism from the Diaspora.

The CEO of the Jewish Federations of North America, Jerry Silverman, called Rotem’s action a “betrayal.”

In a letter of protest from the president of the Union for Reform Judaism that was signed by 14 other organizations, including various arms of the Conservative movement, Rabbi Eric Yoffie wrote, “Rotem’s actions are contrary to the assurances we received in meetings with him and with others over the last several months.”

In an interview with JTA, Rotem was unapologetic about moving ahead and said, “This bill will pass, no doubt.”

“I never promised anything,” Rotem said. “I told them all the time in the meetings that if I will see there is a majority, I will bring it a vote. No one can say I promised anything.”

In their discussions with Rotem, Diaspora leaders expressed concern about an item in the bill that would have taken away the right to automatic citizenship for anyone who comes to Israel as a refugee but then converts to Judaism. Rotem removed that item before pushing the bill through the law committee.

Now, he says, the bill has no effect on American or Diaspora Jews and that this is solely an Israeli matter over which non-Israeli Jews should have no say.

“I don’t know why they wanted to have discussions,” he said. “I came to the U.S. I spoke to leaders, and I explained this is nothing that touched the American community. It has nothing to with Jews in the Diaspora. It is only an Israeli matter.”

Since Monday, Sharansky has engaged in a number of discussions with Israeli lawmakers, including Netanyahu. The Jewish Agency chief said he believes the bill will not come before the Knesset this week, and hopes it will not be on the agenda before the two-month recess provides a chance to alter or scuttle the bill.

Sharansky said he is pushing for Netanyahu and his Likud Party to publicly oppose it.

“If it is clear Likud will not support it, it will not pass,” Sharansky said.

“It is important for us, for the unanimity of the moment, that we have to keep the pressure on,” Rabbi Steven Wernick, the executive vice president of the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, told JTA.

“I think it would be an error to think that in the political society as dynamic and hyper-dynamic as Israel is that we are done with this,” he said. “The people who care about these issues have to constantly keep them on the agenda and explain why they are important to decision makers.”

Opponents alarmed as Israeli conversion bill moves ahead Read More »

White House says outreach to Muslims not NASA’s job

Reaching out to Muslims is not the task of NASA, the White House spokesman said.

During a press briefing Monday, Robert Gibbs said that NASA administrator Charles Bolden’s statement during a June 30 interview with Al Jazeera that he was charged to reach out to the Muslim world was incorrect.

“That was not his task, and that’s not the task of NASA,” Gibbs said.

Gibbs said that Obama has not spoken to Bolden since the interview in an effort to clear things up. Asked if anyone at the White House had spoken to Bolden, Gibbs replied: “I’m sure people—people at the White House here talk to NASA all the time.”

The White House and NASA last week stood behind Bolden.

Bolden also has asserted on previous occasions that he was charged by Obama with outreach to Muslim countries.

White House says outreach to Muslims not NASA’s job Read More »

U.S. lawmakers seek action against campus anti-Semitism

U.S. Congress members of Congress signed a letter expressing concern about how the federal Department of Education is responding to anti-Semitism on college campuses.

The Zionist Organization of America lobbied for the letter, which was signed by 36 lawmakers and sent last week to Department of Education secretary Arne Duncan. The letter raised questions about the department’s Office for Civil Rights’ enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

In 2004 ZOA requested that the civil rights’ office investigate anti-Semitic incidents at the University of California, Irvine. In 2007, after looking into the allegations, the office concluded that it could not take action because the incidents were not based on students’ national origins.

The lawmakers’ letter denounced this decision, saying that the Office for Civil Rights was not abiding by its own policy statement.

The office’s policy statement says that it will enforce Title VI for groups that exhibit both racial and ethnic characteristics, such as Jews. Title VI ensures that recipients of federal funding, including public and most private universities, keep their programming free from racial and ethnic discrimination.

University of California President Mark Yudof said the ZOA’s claims were exaggerated.

“[I will] do everything in my power to protect Jewish and all other students from threats or actions of intolerance,” he said in a July 6 statement.

The letter was written following a briefing for congressional staff about anti-Semitism on college campuses organized by Robert Klein (D-Fla.), co-chairman of the Congressional Task Force on Anti-Semitism.

Speakers at the briefing included representatives from ZOA, The American Jewish Committee and Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life.

U.S. lawmakers seek action against campus anti-Semitism Read More »

Israelis file $1.2 billion suit against Al Jazeera

A group of Israelis has filed a $1.2 billion lawsuit in U.S. federal court against the Al Jazeera news network.

Ninety-one Israeli plaintiffs, civilians who were injured during the monthlong 2006 Second Lebanon War or are relatives of victims, are charging in their suit that the Qatar-based network’s war coverage was designed to help Hezbollah. Al Jazeera has offices in New York.

The suit filed Monday in Manhattan Federal Court says that Al Jazeera, in violation of the Israeli military censorship rules, reported during live coverage the location of missile strikes on Israel, enabling Hezbollah to better aim ensuing missiles.

One plaintiff, a resident of Safed, was struck twice by missiles—on his house and on his car—on the first day of the conflict, Ynet reported.

Hezbollah fired about 4,000 rockets into Israel during the Second Lebanon War. One hundred and fifty nine Israelis and 1,200 people in Lebanon were killed.

Israelis file $1.2 billion suit against Al Jazeera Read More »

Mubarak again postpones Netanyahu meeting

A meeting between Hosni Mubarak and Benjamin Netanyahu was postponed amid rumors that Mubarak is seeking treatment for a serious illness.

The meeting between the Egyptian president and Israeli prime minister was postponed from Tuesday to Wednesday, and then to the following weekend, according to reports. Mubarak’s meeting with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Egypt also was postponed, Palestinian officials told Reuters.

Egyptian officials told Reuters that the meeting was changed for logistic reasons, but the Lebanese daily newspaper As-Safir reported Tuesday that Mubarak was heading to Germany for medical treatment.

Mubarak again postpones Netanyahu meeting Read More »

Lindsay Lohan’s Israeli Girlfriend?

The latest news out of the Lohan camp, besides that 90-day jail sentence, is Lindsay’s new girlfriend—Israeli Eilat Anschel.

The pair met in L.A. amidst Lohan’s struggles with her unsightly SCRAM bracelet. According to ” title=”Lohan’s flirtation with Judaism last year ” target=”_blank”>Lohan’s flirtation with Judaism last year when she was dating then-girlfriend Samantha Ronson, a Jew from Long Island, wasn’t just some fleeting thrill but a real attraction to the chosen. Only time—perhaps only a month and a half—will tell.

by Daniella Penn, Hollywood Jew intern

Lindsay Lohan’s Israeli Girlfriend? Read More »

A Cow Goes Moo, Liat Goes, “Mehhhhh!”

Unless you’ve taken a kabbalah class somewhere along the way, you might not realize that Hebrew is not just a language. It’s a commentary, a philosophy, a teaching, a code filled with insights and secrets. “Oh, Lara, now you’ve really lost it,” you might be thinking. Aval, lo! Ani lo magzima afilu iota! (But, no! I’m not exaggerating even a drop!)

Check it out~
Basic, basic example:  “Dahm” means blood (remember dipping your finger in the wine on Passover?).
                        From that, we get “Ah-dom” which means red, and “Ah-dahm” which means man.
                        From that we get “Ah-dah-ma” which means earth. As man was created from earth and returns to earth…

“Hebrew is an ancient language,” Tamara, our dynamo of a teacher said as if it was the most obvious thing in the world. To her, it must be plainly evident – these connections are all over the Hebrew language!…(And, both her parents are rabbis.)

So, in response to our wonder, Liat, another one of my favorites, might say, “be-tach,” meaning of course; from which we get “ba-too-ach” which means I’m sure, and “le-havtiach” means to promise! All these words have the same root, the essence of their meanings linked.

See, Hebrew is made of “Binyanim” or, buildings, which again is a perfect description of the system because the words build upon themselves, upon their roots, brick by brick.

AND Hebrew also contains within it lessons and messages. Take the word, “ahava” which means to love. The root “hav” means to give. The “ah” is a modifier meaning I.  So the word for love, literally translates to I give. Love is giving. So, while in English we speak of passively “falling in love” (a perplexing word choice, by the way, as my teachers point out), in Hebrew, the language itself teaches that first we give, and as a function of giving, create love. There is wisdom in this language!

So, as you can likely see by now, intensive Hebrew language class is fascinating! This is not the same as learning Bulgarian! (Though I’m sure that language has several…redeeming…things…er, nuggets…and…insights!…surely…to offer. And…I love the Bulgarian cheese here, by the way. Really sets off my watermelon well. So…thanks, Bulgaria. I was just…sayin’…)

Furthermore, it’s incredibly satisfying to feel growth every day. Swimming as my head sometimes is in all the binyanim and their different structures, I can’t seem to get enough of this language. Lucky for me, my classmates are also extremely dedicated to learning. Everyone has the aim to actively participate in Israeli life, so this study is far more than recreational.

Seizing the opportunity, I started “Ulpan Café,” essentially class outings where we get together outside of class, expressly to speak in Hebrew. No English allowed! So far, we’ve had lunch gatherings, coffee gatherings, seret v’seecha (movie and conversation – Hebrew movies, of course), drill team where we quiz each other, laila meeschak (Hebrew game night) and coming up soon will be our Shabbat Lunch! We’re quite a unit and feel very lucky to have such a fun and enthusiastic class!

Another thing that’s made our group dynamic such a blast is, of course, our amazing teachers! Let me give some insight into our classroom. Typically, teachers drill us, using the Socratic method of calling on people at random to test their comprehension. They give us a sentence to translate, and we must respond immediately, or they will move on to someone else.
“I had a donkey,” Fina quizzed.
“Hita li…donkey?,” Toby answered.
“Donkey – chamor,” Fina explained, writing the new word on the board.
“Why will I ever need to know the word, donkey?” Toby called out.
Fina turned around, looked him straight in the eye and said, “In Israel, you have many reasons to use the word donkey.”
And the class erupted into laughter.

“He understood,” Liat challenged.
“Hoo heh-veen,” said Shelli.
“He will understand,” Liat continued.
“Hoo ya-veen,” Shelli answered.
“He understands,” Liat asked.
“Hoo…um…mah-veen?” Shelli tried.
Mehhhhhh!” Liat bleeted like a goosed sheep!
I assure you, my classmates and I never forgot the word, Mehhhhh-veen.

And so it goes. The teachers provide stories, or humor, or songs, or gestures to help us remember…and they work! There’ve been plenty of times when I’ve been called upon and been completely shocked to hear the right answer pop out of my mouth! This sort of automatic response is precisely the aim of our teachers. And they make sure they get what they want: “Don’t mess with me,” Tamara said one time when the whispers at the back of the classroom got too loud. “I was in the army!” she shouted, eyes twinkling. We all laughed but knew she damn-well meant it! The whispers scrammed.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again because it’s so true: A Cow Goes Moo, Liat Goes, “Mehhhhh!” Read More »

Alleged Lebanese spy for Israel sentenced to death

A Lebanese court sentenced an alleged spy for Israel to death.

Tuesday’s sentence, on charges that the man spied for Israel and the information he obtained assisted Israel during the summer 2006 Second Lebanon War, comes on the same day that a Lebanese cell phone executive was charged in a military court with spying for Israel.

Ali Mantash is the second Lebanese citizen to be sentenced to death for spying for Israel, according to Reuters. The conviction and sentencing of Mantash are part of a widescale espionage investigation that has led to the arrest of 50 people since April 2009.

Israel has neither confirmed nor denied that the men are connected to Israel or spied for the country.

Alleged Lebanese spy for Israel sentenced to death Read More »