fbpx

May 7, 2010

Rabbi Lopatin clarifies his Respect for Rav Shai Held

Friends,
As an addendum for more comments regarding Rav Schachter’s shiur at the RCA, I wanted to clarify a few things:

1) I have tremendous respect and admiration for Rabbi Shai Held who wrote the critique of Rav Schacter, at least in terms of “chidush”.  Rabbi Held is a talmid chacham and already an accomplished Jewish thinker and liturgist.  I have used his liturgy on the Tsunami disaster in my shul!  So any rejoinder I have to his critique is said timidly and humbly.  I apologize that I may not have come off sounding this way in my zeal to defend the “chidush” nature of Orthodoxy.  I look forward to continuing discussions and debates with Rav Held in the future.
2) Rav Schachter himself, in this same shiur at the RCA conference, allowed for disagreement with his points.  Rav Schechter emphasized how any halachic authority could disagree with another halachic authority, from an earlier time or contemporary, and therefore, I felt exhilarated after his speech as it legitimized my decision to follow halachic authorities – in the Orthodox world –  who disagree with his stance on the ordination of women to the rabbinate.  Every posek (halachic decisor) must rule what his or her understanding, and every individual must honestly chose which decisor they follow: there will be disagreements, but no one is bound by anyone else’s truth.  If the Gaon from Vilna could disagree with the Gaonim 1000 years before his time, we can certainly feel OK in ruling according to a contemporary posek – or poskim – who disagrees with Rav Schachter. 
3) Thus, I do not think that there is any halachic prohibition on ordaining women as rabbis, and while the time may not be right in Orthodoxy at the moment for this practice, I look forward to the time when it will be appropriate.  In the meantime, within Orthodoxy, I hope to see more and more shuls with full time women in the clergy, and I hope there Yeshivat Maharat, and the programs which confer other titles to women, such as Yoatzot Halacha, will continue to grow and thrive.  I hope that Orthodox leaders step up to the plate to fund those programs and those positions.
Rabbi Asher Lopatin

Rabbi Lopatin clarifies his Respect for Rav Shai Held Read More »

NEXT Shabbat-a-thon

I huffed in my hot car, shelpping to Santa Monica, halted in Friday afternoon LA traffic, but looking forward to breathing the clean beach air, free from the work week’s nuisances. After my Shabbat bereft tenure in San Francisco, getting myself to my host’s house is a small price to pay for inclusion in the special occasion. I live alone, and all too often find myself, exhausted, sorting the junk from my mail, mentally measuring my refrigerator contents against the proper ingredients for a satisfying dinner, while my cat meows hungrily against my legs. Friday night is supposed to feel like precious deliverance, but I often find myself lonesome and hungry, and despite the sunshine, a little cold inside. I agree that Friday night’s receding sun should symbolize a celebration of sorts, but with whom can I share company and a moment of reflection? The Jews!

“>NEXT Shabbat program on one weekend in April.  Hundreds participated in Shabbat festivities in various homes across the Southland, from Seal Beach to The Valley. Between Friday and Saturday evening I attended three such events, including a Friday night dinner, Saturday afternoon Seudah Shlishit (the traditional third meal of the Sabbath), and a Havdalah dinner, which brought it all to a lovely close. Extinguishing in wine the burning ends of the intricately braided candle, marking our separation from Shabbat, meant we found ourselves in the darkness of my friend’s apartment. I found this apropos, because, really, we begin in darkness. So, Havdalah signifies not just resuming our ordinary work (walking the dog, reading emails), but actually, a rejuvenation and metaphysical rebirth. Traversing the quiet terrain of the Sabbath, moving from the fall of darkness to the fall of darkness, is, like all earthly cycles, is a completion. With completion comes a fundamental satisfaction and sense of peace.

If Shabbat is about a state of mind, a time to think and exist, then my NEXT Shabbat experience truly succeeded in rewarding me, through friends and an abundance of delicious foods, for all my diligence and endeavors during the week.

NEXT Shabbat-a-thon Read More »

Is Sushi Dead?

Tonight on my way home from a lecture I ate in a popular Japanese restaurant in West L.A. The chef/owner joined me, and we fell into talking about the state of fish.  This is a man with 30 years experience in the Japanese restaurant business in Los Angeles—sushi, bento, ramen, robata, teriyaki combos, you name it. He didn’t want to be identified, but trust me, you’ve eaten his food.

While I ate his food and sipped his cold sake, he drank iced green tea bobas.  I was eating a piece of grilled local yellowtail, telling him how much I liked the flavor of a relatively local fish. 

“Sushi is over,” he said, pretty much out of the blue.  “The price goes up and the quality is going down.  It got too popular.  Everything is farmed, now in Japan even tuna is farmed, and it is all fatty, not fatty and lean, like in the wild.  Here people will eat farmed salmon, but in Japan no one eats salmon sushi—it has parasites.”

The problem, he said, is that there is almost no more good wild fish left.  When he first came to the States, 98 percent of tuna was sold in Japan.  Now everybody wants tuna, including China and India and Russia.  The wild stocks are crashing, and there;‘s no point in pretending what’s left can sustain all the gazillions of sushi restaurants.

He himself is moving away from sushi toward other Japanese foods: izakaya, ramen, robata, fusion. It’s time to teach Americans to eat parts of chickens and pigs they never tried before, to get them accustomed to beef heart and chicken combs like they got accustomed to sea urchin roe and eel.

He was going on and on about getting Americans to appreciate Japanese chicken like they appreciate Japanese fish.  One brand, Jidori (it translates as “ground chicken”; i. e. free range,” in Japanese, ji= ground and tori= chicken) is raised on farms around Central California and has a deep, rich flavor, could please even the most dedicated eel-eater.

The man wasn’t being sensitive to the fate of the oceans, or nostalgic for the last big eye tuna—just practical.  But he was attuned to the problem now, before it’s too late—a businessman paying heed to those who are listening to what science and nature are saying. The more we love food, the more we have to obey nature: one ties us inexorably to the other. The technology that helps us track and kill the last tuna also helps us get and spread more complete information on the fate of our fisheries, and gives people like this chef the chance to make the right decision for his business, before it’s too late.

 

Is Sushi Dead? Read More »

Hollywood out in full force for Simon Wiesenthal dinner starring Ron Howard, Brian Grazer

The Simon Wiesenthal Center Museum of Tolerance once again proved that their cuddly relationship with Hollywood is a boost for their cause.

This year’s national tribute dinner honoring director-producer team Ron Howard and Brian Grazer, along with three medal of valor recipients, attracted the most star-studded crowd of recent years. Some of the industry’s heaviest heavyweights – including Jeffrey Katzenberg, Bob Iger and Russell Crowe—clustered at the center of the Beverly Wilshire ballroom for a 2-hour homage to MOT’s human rights work. 

The annual event was held on May 5 and drew leaders from the Walt Disney Company – including Iger, its CEO, and chairman Rich Ross, as well as the top brass from NBC Universal – comprised of controversial chief Jeff Zucker and Universal Studios head Ron Meyer, who sat with the honorees in a likely show of solidarity for the upcoming Grazer-produced “Robin Hood” starring Crowe, who was there to present Howard and Grazer with their Humanitarian Award. 

Also at the dining-room-table-of-honor was director Brett Ratner who has made it something of a personal tradition to lead the hamotzi.

The only misguided star that evening was emcee Jay Leno, who was late, and whose brief routine on rectal-inserted bombs and explosive diarrhea failed to thrill. (Hear that Mr. Zucker?) Katzenberg wisely detected the crowd’s cool reception and announced that Leno had kindly written a check – no word on how much – to the Wiesenthal Center.

“Had you mentioned that before,” Leno said, leaning into the mic, “I would have gotten bigger laughs.”

Rabbi Marvin Hier transitioned the crowd into the serious part of the evening, the presentation of the medal of valor honors, by applauding recipients who “celebrate the principles of human dignity and tolerance and stand firm against the apostles of hatred and bigotry.” He had high praise for each of the three medal recipients: a posthumous Sir Winston Churchill—“the man who saved Western civilization” – a brave prime minister who defied popular opinion to combat Hitler and his regime; a posthumous Le Maire Aristide Pelissier, the mayor of a small French town, Les Brunels, who provided a mother and her daughter safe-haven from the Nazis; and Dr. Ofer Merin, the deputy director general of Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem who oversaw the IDF Field Hospital operation in Haiti.

“One thing they all share is courage,” Churchill’s granddaughter, Celia Sandys, who accepted the award on his behalf, said of the honorees. She spoke of Churchill’s moral courage to be “a lone voice” warning England of the threat building across the English Channel. Despite opposition from within his own country, “He didn’t give in,” she said. “We felt he was put on this earth for a purpose, that he was walking with destiny,” she said. Quoting one of Churchill’s own self-reflections on fighting the Nazis, she read, “All my past life was but a preparation for this hour and this trial.”

The dinner, though largely a schmoozefest, wasn’t short on teary moments. Esther Lieberman, who was only a young girl when Pelissier saved her from the Nazis, stood on the stage as her 13 children and grandchildren rose from their seats to gallant applause. And Merin, who was heroically applauded for his work in Haiti, received an emotional standing ovation buttressed by palpable Jewish pride in Israel. Merin spoke about the Israeli mission in Haiti, and said that despite their very best efforts, the Israeli medical team was but “a drop in the ocean,” able to treat only a fraction of the 300,000 Haitians injured. This was a sobering realization for many of the physicians, Merin said, who had to learn “the ability to accept what we could do, and what we could not.” 

Crowe took the stage next to introduce Howard and Grazer with a speech he twittered he had “spent most of the day writing.”

“What is at the core of the American dream,” Crowe said, “is tolerance and humanity; in [Howard and Grazer’s] work, you see tolerance and humanity are very important to them, and when you meet them you realize their kindness as men.”

Though it wasn’t explicit why Grazer and Howard were chosen to receive the evening’s highest honor – especially in light of the work of the evening’s other honorees—they both delivered tender and personal remarks about what the award meant to them. 

Howard, who is not Jewish, recalled a time early in his career on the set of “Happy Days” when director Jerry Paris noticed him pacing nervously. Howard told Paris he was indeed feeling jittery.

“Cute,” Howard remembers Paris saying. “Waspy on the outside, total Jew on the inside!” (If only Leno had thought to serve up some Jewish jokes..)

Howard said that Paris, who died in 1986, would often say to him, ‘It’s never too late—we can still Bar Mitzvah you!’

“Well Jerry, this is not quite the bar mitzvah you dreamed of but it’s pretty remarkable,” Howard said to heaps of laughter.

Howard spoke eloquently about the importance of American leadership in promoting cultural diversity and “the human yearning for unity.” The SWC museum, he said, “is a living reminder that silent witnesses to tyranny and injustice are tacit supporters.” 

Before the crowd spilled out of the ballroom and into the valet line, Leno singled out one audience member, Berkeley student body president Will Smelko, who recently risked his own popularity to veto a fashionable divest-from-Israel bill that had been passed by the student senate.

“Will, you are that next Mayor in France,” Leno said.

A woman who identified herself as a Holocaust survivor approached Smelko on the way out and said, “People like you saved my life.”

So why did a 22-year-old non-Jewish student leader go against the grain for the Jewish state?

“It was a very one-sided attack on Israel,” Smelko said of the bill. On the surface, it seemed to make some sense, he said, but a closer look indicated a more spurious agenda. “The bill was being used for the political delegitimizing of the State of Israel. Something told me the way they used the bill was morally wrong.”

Hollywood out in full force for Simon Wiesenthal dinner starring Ron Howard, Brian Grazer Read More »

Elena Kagan to be nominated for Supreme Court

Don’t say I didn’t call it: Elena Kagan will be nominated to fill the Supreme Court vacancy that will be left when John Paul Stevens retired. From Politico’s Mike Allen:

Look for President Obama to name his Supreme Court pick Monday, and look for it to be Solicitor General Elena Kagan, a former Harvard Law dean. The pick isn’t official, but top White House aides will be shocked if it’s otherwise. Kagan’s relative youth (50) is a huge asset for the lifetime post. And President Obama considers her to be a persuasive, fearless advocate who would serve as an intellectual counterweight to Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Scalia, and could lure swing Justice Kennedy into some coalitions The West Wing may leak the pick to AP’s Ben Feller on the later side Sunday, then confirm it for others for morning editions. For now, aides say POTUS hasn’t decided, to their knowledge

If Kagan is nominated and confirmed, the Supreme Court will be made up entirely of Catholics and Jews.

Elena Kagan to be nominated for Supreme Court Read More »

Steven Spielberg: The Jewish boy who won’t grow up?

A MUST-read on Steven Spielberg.

Nicole LaPorte, author of the new book, “The Men Who Would Be King” (a.k.a the scions of Dreamworks: Spielberg, Katzenberg and Geffen) reveals the inside story of the failed Dreamworks empire. Her portrait of Spielberg depicts a side we haven’t seen—or haven’t wanted to see—namely, that of a needy child in search of business partners who could serve as surrogate parents. LaPorte breaks down a world that seemed largely perfect on the outside, “suitable for framing,” she writes, in order to reveal the darker details surrounding Spielberg’s “shattered dream” as she calls it. The book purports to reveal details of Spielberg’s failed marriage to Amy Irving, his veneration of producing partner Walter F. Parkes and the elaborate world around him designed to cater to his whims (the author writes that at Amblin Entertainment, there were speakers in the bushes so that Spielberg’s spontaneous cravings and requests could be satiated immediately).

Read more at The Daily Beast:

For protection, Spielberg had always had surrogate parents, such as the late Lew Wasserman and Sid Sheinberg, the legends of Universal. Amblin, meanwhile, was overseen by the husband-and-wife team of Kathleen Kennedy and Frank Marshall, who tended to Steven’s day-to-day affairs and were referred to as the “parents.” Kennedy, a scrubbed, athletic type whose style was forceful diplomacy, understood that working for Spielberg wasn’t just about execution; it was about cushioning him from the harsher truths. When her husband left Amblin to set up a production company elsewhere, the idea was that Kennedy would follow. The couple wanted lives of their own. But Spielberg was so upset over the prospect of her leaving—considering it a kind of desertion—that in retaliation he forced her to delay her departure. At Amblin, the situation was labeled “the divorce.”

At DreamWorks, Spielberg replaced the aging, disempowered Wasserman and Sheinberg with guardians just as tough: Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen. Assuming the Kennedy/Marshall roles were another husband-and-wife team, Walter Parkes and Laurie MacDonald, who ran DreamWorks’ live-action studio. Hollywood was shocked when that job did not go to Katzenberg, who had nearly 20 years of studio experience (Katzenberg himself was pained and embarrassed by the news, according to friends), considering that, between them, Parkes, an Oscar-nominated screenwriter and MacDonald, a former junior studio VP, had virtually none. But for Spielberg, it was a no-brainer: He believed in the couple, trusted them above anyone, and valued their sophistication, class, and taste. For a man, who as one person says, “falls in love with people,” Spielberg was enamored of his friends, most especially Parkes, a tall, unnervingly good-looking Yalie whose overpowering confidence and verbal agility caused one associate to describe him as “a Shakespearian actor holding forth on the Globe stage.”

No one could miss the Freudian implications of the relationship between the nerdy boy-man, who, growing up in unkind suburbia, had wanted “to be a gentile with the same intensity that I wanted to be a filmmaker” and this chiseled golden boy, who had grown up as Wally Fishman in Beverly Hills, but changed his name to Parkes when he landed in New Haven.

“Walter Parkes is Steven’s idea of what he should have been—East Coast-educated, upper-middle-class family, good-looking guy, right wife the first time, not the second time,” said producer Tony Ludwig.

Unlike most, Parkes wasn’t afraid to stand up to Spielberg, and had no trouble telling the director that some of his ideas were harebrained, or, worse, low-brow.

“Walter wasn’t afraid to bully Steven,” said one insider, “with everything—his looks, his ideas.”

But the couple’s inexperience running a studio became apparently almost immediately—it would take three long years before any movies were released, a fact that drove Katzenberg, especially, mad (at one point he confronted Parkes at a company retreat: “Where are my movies, Walter?”—and Parkes’ propensity to rewrite scripts and bully not just Spielberg, but filmmakers, with his healthy ego, would ultimately make DreamWorks quite the opposite of what it set out to be at its inception: an artist unfriendly place.

Steven Spielberg: The Jewish boy who won’t grow up? Read More »

A message from the editor: Our new blogger, Michael Berenbaum

Dear Readers:

I’m very excited to announce our newest blogger, Michael Berenbaum. There are a lot of blogs on Israel and Jewish politics. But Michael’s blog will provide fresh, topical perspective on the Jewish news of the day, rooted in his profound understanding of Jewish history and text, and his passion for Jewish survival. At a time of increasing political polarization and urgent, life-and-death decisions, you will find Michael judicious, fair, accurate and insightful. You may not agree with all of his opinions, but you will come to respect the depth of learning and caring on which he bases them.

Michael Berenbaum is an American scholar, professor, rabbi, writer and filmmaker, who specializes in the study of the memorialization of the Holocaust. He is perhaps best known for his work as deputy director of the President’s Commission on the Holocaust (1979–1980), project director of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) (1988–1993) and director of the USHMM’s Holocaust Research Institute (1993–1997); as such, Michael played a major role in the creation of the USHMM and the content of its permanent exhibition. From 1997-1999, Michael served as president and CEO of the Survivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundation and subsequently (and currently) as director of the Sigi Ziering Institute: Exploring the Ethical and Religious Implications of the Holocaust, located at the American Jewish University (formerly known as the University of Judaism), in Los Angeles, Calif.

In searching for a lead blogger on Jewish news, we wanted someone with an encyclopedic knowledge of Jewish history, culture and religion. It just so happens that Michael was also the executive editor of the New Encyclopedia Judaica, 2nd ed., which includes 22 volumes, six million words and 25,000 individual contributions to Jewish knowledge, published in December 2006.

The title of the blog, “A Jew,” recalls both the great intellectual Ahad Ha’am’s self-reference as “One of the People,” as well as the name of the first Jewish periodical ever published in America, “The Jew,” printed in 1832. In the digital age, the way Jewish news is delivered may change, but the quality of that news and opinion must remain high.

Please make Michael Berenbaum’s “A Jew” part of your regular reading. Click here to add Michael to your RSS Feed.

Here’s his latest: Listen, Learn, Then Challenge

Rob Eshman
Editor-in-Chief
TRIBE Media Corp.
www.jewishjournal.com

A message from the editor: Our new blogger, Michael Berenbaum Read More »

LIVE BROADCAST: “Spun Out: Five bloggers explain how the mainstream media smears America’s friends

UPDATE: This is a recording of a live broadcast from Monday, May 10, 2010.

See video players below

JewishJournal.com will broadcast LIVE from the Skirball Cultural Center on Monday, May 10 at 7pm. Tune in to this page to watch “SPUN OUT Five Bloggers explain how the mainstream media smears America’s friends and excuses our enemies…and what you can do about it. Panelists include Jim Hoft (Gateway Pundit), Daniel Greenfield (Sultan Knish), J.E. Dyer (Optmistic Conservative), Rick Richman (Jewish Current Issues) and Omri Ceren (Mere Rhetoric).

Sponsored by ” title=”tickets here” target=”_blank”>tickets here: Seating is limited. Registration is recommended.

For more information email {encode=”info@cjhsla.org” title=”info@cjhsla.org”} or call (818)704-0523.
The Skirball Cultural Center is located at 2701 N. Sepulveda Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90049

Please excuse any technical difficulties. If you are having trouble viewing this player, try refreshing the page.

LIVE BROADCAST: “Spun Out: Five bloggers explain how the mainstream media smears America’s friends Read More »

That’s his legal name

I feel like we’ve been down this road before:

The victim might have forgiven the woman who ran him down in a Massachusetts crosswalk, but police haven’t.

Police say a Pittsfield woman has been cited for running down a man named Lord Jesus Christ as he crossed a street in Northampton on Tuesday.

The 50-year-old man is from Belchertown. Officers checked his ID and discovered that, indeed, his legal name is Lord Jesus Christ. He was taken to the hospital for treatment of minor facial injuries.

I wonder if he was doing his Abbey Road impression.

That’s his legal name Read More »

Zostavax is Safe, Effective, and Not Free

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is the virus that causes chicken pox, usually a relatively minor childhood illness.  Unlike other viruses that are cleared from our bodies after infection, VZV stays in our sensory nerve cells forever.  Over the subsequent decades our immunity to VZV wanes.  When our immunity falls too low, VZV can reactivate and cause shingles.  Shingles is a painful blistering rash along the distribution of one sensory nerve.  The rash resolves in a few weeks, but in some older patients the effected patch of skin can remain painful for months or even permanently.  This painful condition after shingles is called postherpetic neuralgia and it can be quite debilitating.

In 2006 a vaccine to prevent shingles, Zostavax, became available.  It is recommended for everyone over 60 who has had chicken pox.  It has been proven effective in preventing shingles, and therefore in preventing postherpetic neuralgia.

But is Zostavax safe?  A large study in the current issue of Annals of Internal Medicine answered that question.  The study randomized over 38,000 patients to receive Zostavax or a placebo injection.  The side effects from Zostavax were not worse than from placebo.  Most of the side effects (like most vaccines) involved inflammation at the site of injection.

So to summarize, Zostavax is safe, and it effectively prevents a very painful potentially disabling condition. Recall also that all children are now being vaccinated against chicken pox, so that in 60 years Zostavax will not even be necessary since a generation will have grown up uninfected with VZV.

In anything resembling a rational healthcare delivery system champagne corks would fly, the makers of Zostavax would get a pat on the back (and well-deserved profits) and we would all shift our attention to more pressing matters.  Some patients would decide to buy Zostavax; some would not.  Private or government charity programs would pay for the vaccine for indigent patients.  Joy and health would reign.

But instead, there is gnashing of teeth and wringing of hands.  Why?  Because only about 7% of eligible patients have received the vaccine.  It turns out Zostavax is the most expensive vaccine recommended for adults (about $200) and the first to be covered by Medicare part D, the Medicare drug “benefit”.  That means pharmacists are paid to dispense it to patients, not doctors.

To sort out why more patients aren’t receiving Zostavax, another study in the same issue of Annals of Internal Medicine surveyed hundreds of primary care doctors about the barriers that might be preventing them from recommending and administering Zostavax to their patients.  The results: the biggest barrier was financial.  Many patients without coverage don’t want to pay for it, and doctors aren’t being paid by insurance companies to administer it.

This was such a staggeringly shocking finding, that it merited an editorial in the very same issue of Annals.  That’s three articles about a vaccine that works as intended and is safe.  The editorial opines that reimbursement should be revised to promote increased utilization of the vaccine.  In other words, we should take more money from other people to assure that patients who don’t want to pay for their own Zostavax can get it for free.

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m all for charity care for indigent patients.  (I volunteer at a clinic that serves indigent patients two afternoons a month.)  But the vast majority of patients who aren’t getting Zostavax aren’t poor; they just have better things to do with $200.

What the editorial didn’t say is that you can’t do much better than a product or service in which the main barrier to obtaining more is the price.  After all, that’s the only reason we don’t get twice as many clothes or cars or homes.  If the price was lower, we would.  If Zostavax was free, some other barrier to its use would necessarily arise, perhaps a lengthy wait, or a difficult to navigate bureaucracy, or rationing by some other means.

So perhaps each patient should shoulder the cost of his or her own Zostavax.  We should also all donate a little time or money for those who truly can’t afford it.  And some of us may rationally choose to accept the risk of shingles.  Alternatively, we could riot in Athens until the EU pays to keep us all shingles-free.

Learn more:

Annals of Internal Medicine Summary for Patients:  ” target=”_blank”>Safety of Herpes Zoster Vaccine in the Shingles Prevention Study

Annals of Internal Medicine article:  ” target=”_blank”>The Looming Rash of Herpes Zoster and the Challenge of Adult Immunization

Important legal mumbo jumbo:
Anything you read on the web should be used to supplement, not replace, your doctor’s advice.  Anything that I write is no exception.  I’m a doctor, but I’m not your doctor despite the fact that you read or comment on my posts.  Leaving a comment on a post is a wonderful way to enter into a discussion with other readers, but I will not respond to comments (just because of time constraints).

Zostavax is Safe, Effective, and Not Free Read More »