fbpx

December 8, 2009

New U.S. anti-Semitism envoy facing formidable task

Hannah Rosenthal, President Obama’s nominee for the post of special envoy to monitor and combat anti-Semitism, certainly has her work cut out for her.

According to the latest report from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, hate crimes remain “a serious problem” in the OSCE’s 56 member states.  Yet, incredibly, only eight of the 56 governments provided the OSCE with data on recent anti-Semitic incidents in their countries. Clearly there are regimes that hope to preserve their country’s image by whitewashing local anti-Semitism. Confronting them will be one of Ms. Rosenthal’s many challenges.

There can be no doubt that anti-Semitism continues to manifest itself across the globe, and in a wide range of forms. In Sweden, a prominent newspaper recently accused Israelis of kidnapping Arabs in order to harvest their organs. In Honduras, political figures and pundits are blaming Jews for the country’s political crisis. In Hungary and Austria, far-right extremists are exploiting the democratic system to significantly increase their representation in parliament. And here at home, in Edison, N.J., a yeshiva student was assaulted by anti-Semitic thugs on Rosh Hashanah and a synagogue was daubed with swastikas on Yom Kippur.

The position of U.S. envoy to monitor and combat anti-Semitism was established in 2004 in response to the frightening proliferation of anti-Jewish hatred around the world. The late Rep. Tom Lantos (D-Calif.), later joined by Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) and Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.), initiated the legislation that created the position. Lantos, a Holocaust survivor, saw echoes of a dark past in our own era, both in the spread of anti-Semitism worldwide and the failure of Western democracies to speak out against it.

Obviously there are vast differences between the Hitler period and our own era. At the same time, it is important to recognize today’s serious dangers.

When Iranian leaders threaten to annihilate Israel—and actively try to develop the weapons that would enable them to do that—they should be taken as seriously as anti-Semitic leaders in the 1930s should have been taken.

When Arab regimes teach their schoolchildren to hate Jews while glorifying violence and denying the Holocaust ever took place, they must be challenged—especially when the United States is in a position to use its aid and influence with those regimes as leverage.

When Holocaust deniers claim that the Nazis’ slaughter of 6 million Jews is a myth circulated by an international Jewish propaganda machine—that, too, must be recognized as anti-Semitism.

When extremists cynically manipulate United Nations forums to blame Israel and “Zionists” for all the ills of the world, they must be denounced.

When fanatics in any country try to mask their anti-Semitism as opposition to Israel or Zionism, they must be exposed. The U.S. position on this question, as articulated in last year’s report by the State Department’s Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism, is that “the demonization of Israel or vilification of Israeli leaders, sometimes through comparisons with Nazi leaders, and through the use of Nazi symbols to caricature them, indicates an anti-Semitic bias rather than a valid criticism of policy
concerning a controversial issue.”

Some of the governments that Ms. Rosenthal investigates surely will lean on her to go easy on them in her reports. She may find herself under pressure from U.S. government officials who believe that having friendly relations with a particular regime is more important than speaking out against anti-Semitism in that country.

We hope she resists these pressures and stands up for those who were denied such help during the darkest of period in human history, the Holocaust. If she does, she will have served her office well and upheld our nation’s noble humanitarian legacy.

Gregg Rickman served as the first U.S. special envoy to monitor and combat anti-Semitism, from 2006 to 2009. Rafael Medoff is director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies.

New U.S. anti-Semitism envoy facing formidable task Read More »

Obama rebukes Turkey leader for anti-Israel rhetoric

President Obama rebuked the Turkish prime minister for belligerent anti-Israel rhetoric, saying it was harming Turkey’s profile.

“In the president’s meeting with Prime Minister Erdogan yesterday, the president told the prime minister that his anti-Israel rhetoric was eroding his nation’s ability to effectively lead on the issue as it had in the past,” said a statement relayed Tuesday to JTA by a U.S. official. “The president pressed the prime minister to make rebuilding Turkey’s ties with Israel a priority.”

Obama and Tayyip Erdogan met Monday to discuss ties between the two nations. Turkey is seeking to reinforce its ties with the United States as it is increasingly isolated from Europe because of tensions over its candidacy for membership in the European Union and the Islamist tilt of Erdogan’s government.

Erdogan has heightened criticism of Israel more than any other Turkish leader since ties were established in the early 1950s, accusing Israel of war crimes during last winter’s Gaza war, and defending Iran’s nuclear progtam.

In remarks after the meeting, Erdogan said he hoped to resume Turkey’s role as a peace broker in the region; that role has been eroded in part because of tattered Turkey-Israel ties. He also suggested he was more conciliatory about containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

“We have also had opportunity to discuss what we can do jointly in the region with regard to nuclear programs,” Erdogan said. “We as Turkey stand ready to do whatever we can to ensure a diplomatic solution to the nuclear issue in our region. And we stand ready as Turkey to do whatever we can do with respect to relations between Israel and the Palestinians, and Israel and Syria, because I do believe that, first and foremost, the United States, too, has important responsibility in trying to achieve global peace.”

Obama rebukes Turkey leader for anti-Israel rhetoric Read More »

Iran sanctions likely to pass — thanks to Iran

For years the pro-Israel lobby has been pushing more punitive steps to deter Iran’s nuclear ambitions. But with enhanced U.S. sanctions increasingly likely by early next year, opponents and supporters agree that the case was finally made—by Iran itself.

The key to the accelerated path to a sanctions bill that insiders now believe will land on President Obama’s desk within a month was Iran’s belligerent rejection of a Western offer to substantively enhance its peaceful nuclear program in exchange for greater transparency.

“There’s no lack of appetite for passing the sanctions,” said an official of one of the centrist pro-Israel groups that has pushed for legislation targeting third parties, including countries that deal with Iran’s energy sector.

“It’s evident,” the official said, that the Iranians “do not want talks. They’re not going full speed ahead, they’re going full nuclear ahead.”

Even a leading opponent of sanctions, such as Trita Parsi, who heads the National Iranian American Council, conceded that such a measure now seems inevitable—and that the Iranian government’s behavior in recent weeks was behind the accelerated pace.

“There’s a very justified disappointment with how the negotiations have gone and with how the Iranians have conducted the negotiations,” he said.

In October, Iran initially accepted the offer to hand over much of its low-enriched uranium to Russia and France for further enrichment to medical research levels. It also agreed to allow inspectors to examine a second, secret nuclear enrichment plant at Qom, just days after President Obama revealed its existence based on Western intelligence reports.

Within weeks, however, Iran reneged on the deal—despite claiming that it had suggested the deal in the first place—and obstructed inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, from thoroughly investigating the second enrichment site.

Parsi asserted that the resistance arose not from a regime implacably opposed to engagement with the West, but instead from elements that oppose Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s government and seek to undermine it by painting the government as undermining Iran’s national interests. The paradox, Parsi said, is that these elements are otherwise perceived in the West as friendlier to rapprochement.

Nonetheless, Iran’s recidivism led two of the most critical opponents of enhanced sanctions—China and Russia—to join in an IAEA resolution blasting Iran for not cooperating. Iran countered that it would build an additional 10 enrichment sites.

Iran’s actions whittled away the reluctance of a number of key players who had worried that new sanctions would pre-empt Obama’s efforts to resolve the crisis through direct talks with Tehran—chief among them the president himself, who is now considered likely to sign a sanctions bill.

It was Obama who dispatched his most prominent Iran hawk, Dennis Ross, and Jeffrey Bader, both senior staffers on the National Security Council, to China in late October to make the case for signing on to the IAEA resolution. Ross’ argument reportedly was simple but effective: Help contain Iran, or we won’t be able to contain Israel.

Another domino to drop was U.S. Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.), the chairman of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee. He not only lifted his hold on the proposed House legislation, but now is fast tracking it for a vote by next week. There are similar plans in the Senate, although they may be delayed past the Christmas break because of the vexed health care debate.

In the Jewish community, tougher sanctions have been pushed for at least a decade by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and, more recently, by other centrist, established pro-Israel organizations. The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, a politically and denominationally diverse umbrella organization consisting of more than 50 groups, issued a statement over the weekend urging both chambers of Congress to pass sanctions legislation by the end of the year if possible.

“The timing for this vote is especially significant,” said Presidents Conference chairman Alan Solow and executive vice chairman Malcolm Hoenlein in the statement. “Should the IRPSA legislation pass the House, it has the potential to seriously impact the Iranian economy. The prospect of the sanctions in this bill and the Iran Sanctions Enabling Act, which overwhelmingly passed the House in October, are essential to pressing Iran, the leading violator of human rights and state sponsor of terrorism globally, against pursuing a nuclear weapons capacity.”

Signaling just how widespread Jewish organizational support is for the sanctions, they now have the support of J Street, a lobbying group that generally advocates for stepped-up U.S. diplomacy rather than confrontation.

For months, J Street has said it backed the sanctions in principle but opposed pushing them forward while engagement was under way. But Monday the group issued a statement expressing support for the congressional measures, citing “Iran’s continued defiance of the international community and its rejection of the most recent diplomatic offer on nuclear enrichment.”

“We’re not jumping for joy for supporting this legislation,” said Hadar Susskind, J Street’s political director. “Iran has showed itself to be bad actor.”

The legislation, Susskind said, “is not perfect, it doesn’t resolve every problem, but it shows Iran that the United States and other nations are serious about this.”

One pro-Israel group remains actively opposed: Americans For Peace Now says the sanctions would backfire by turning Iranians toward a regime now fending off accusations of illegitimacy.

The group is lobbying Congress to loosen the legislation’s restrictions on the president’s ability to waive the sanctions—saying that tying his hands undermines their usefulness as a diplomatic stick.

“Rather than ‘empowering’ the President with additional authority,” as the bill promises, Americans for Peace Now said in a letter to House members, “HR 2194 would sharply limit his authority regarding both existing sanctions and potential new ones.”

Steve Clemons, a senior analyst at the liberal New America Foundation, said such posturing plays into the hands of a regime eager to blare its nationalist credentials in the wake of a summer of protests that undermined its credibility.

“They are trying to create external crises to consolidate internal power,” he said. “We shouldn’t help them.”

Parsi said rushing forward the unilateral U.S. sanctions would undercut efforts by Obama to sign on the international community to multilateral sanctions by early next year, adding that unilateral sanctions might have the effect of alienating Russia, China and key European nations by targeting major companies in those nations.

“Are you going to have a bomb by Christmas Eve?” Parsi asked, referring to the accelerated congressional schedule. “You don’t want to give the impression that people are dying to go for sanctions because that casts the diplomacy in doubt.”

Underscoring the sinking standing of the Iranian regime, Parsi’s organization blasted the Obama administration this week for not making human rights as much a priority as nuclear weapons.

“Iran’s human rights abuses must be addressed now and not just when our focus turns to punitive measures,” he wrote in a column on the Huffington Post blog.

“Otherwise, the administration will unintentionally signal that the rights of the Iranian people are used solely as a pressure tactic against Iran when it fails to compromise on other issues.”

Iran sanctions likely to pass — thanks to Iran Read More »

Collectors Light Up Over Chanukah Lamps

Mark and Peachy Levy have collected antique Chanukah lamps for more than 30 years. Although neither grew up with a strong Jewish identity, they have deepened their connection through their Judaica collection, including chanukiyot, or Chanukah menorahs, from around the world, many of which have been catalogued and put on display at museums.

“You see something you like and you buy it. After you’ve bought about three, you are officially a collector,” Peachy said.

Many Judaica collections tend to feature a variety of Chanukah lamps because artists in almost every Jewish community created them, Mark Levy explained, and many of those lamps survived.

One of the oldest collected Chanukah lamps, featured in the book “Luminous Art: Hanukkah Menorahs of The Jewish Museum” by Susan L. Braunstein, was a medieval marble piece, carved in Avignon in southeastern France around the 12th to 13th century. It bears a quote from Proverbs 6:23: “For the commandment is a lamp and the teaching is a light.”

For those who collect and restore Chanukah lamps, the appeal is often multifaceted — from reinforcing Jewish identity and honoring Jewish history and perseverance, to preserving forms of artistic Jewish expression, to carrying on family traditions and maintaining a symbolic reminder of familial origins.

As the importance of Chanukah grows in the United States, so too does the emphasis on the chanukiyah as a modern symbol of Judaism. At a recent auction in New York, collectors displayed a willingness to spend upward of six figures to acquire rare pieces.

“Chanukah today has taken on a great deal of significance in terms of the Jewish calendar,” said Alan Stern, who began collecting Judaica with his wife, Lisa, on their 10th wedding anniversary. “It’s a festival that is beloved by all the Jewish people and it’s one that is kept by all the Jewish people. Any Jewish home that identifies Jewishly has a menorah in the home. So a menorah is a very significant Jewish ritual object, on par with the mezuzah.”

Prior to the adoption of the Magen David as the symbol of the Zionist movement in 1897, the seven-branch menorah was historically the most significant symbol of the Jewish people, said Grace Cohen Grossman, senior curator at the Skirball Cultural Center.

Collecting lamps represents “a historical and cultural kind of treasuring,” she said, explaining that menorahs speak to the values, traditions, customs and socio-economic conditions of their communities of origin.

For some, collecting honors those who lit the lamps despite dire circumstances.

“It’s a very important sense of identification with the struggle of the Jewish people” Alan Stern said. “It is something that has been kept with great sacrifice throughout the centuries. The story of Chanukah itself is one of holding onto beliefs and practices. The Greek goal was to destroy Jewish belief, so the menorah is significant in that it portrays our struggle against our spiritual destruction.”

Lisa also found that collecting was a way to identify with her Judaism.

“Judaica is fraught with emotion,” she said, “because you know that the people who owned these items paid a high price for being born Jewish.”

Knowing the history of the makers and the provenance of their large Eastern European collection is important to Lisa.

“Among those communities decimated by Hitler, these are some of the only remnants that survive,” she said.

Later she explains the joy and privilege of restoring, preserving and displaying.

“You take an inanimate object and restore it and it comes alive again. And because we know the tortured history of the people that owned them, it has special meaning,” she said.

Among the Sterns’ pieces are two matching silver menorahs made by a Polish silversmith. One is said to have survived from a shul looted during Kristallnacht.

They also have whimsical pieces, including a 17th century Dutch menorah with birds, antelopes and buckets to hold the oil, and one from early Palestine that has a musical component. They rotate their collection at the Museum of Tolerance.

President George W. Bush and first lady Laura Bush used a chanukiyah from the Sterns’ collection during a White House holiday celebration on Dec. 18, 2006.

“The ceramic plaques around the base feature biblical scenes of the Chanukah story,” Bush said, describing the lamp at the lighting. “And between the menorah branches are painted doves, which represent the eternal wish for peace.”

Some collectors are willing to pay significant sums for Chanukah lamps. In May, a rare synagogue ark-form Galician Chanukah lamp, dated 1787, went for $314,000 at Skinner Auction House’s Fine Judaica auction; the piece had been given a presale estimate of $60,000-$80,000. A silver Temple-form lamp from Kiev fetched $189,600, and a 19th century Polish silver Chanukah lamp sold for $142,200. Both pieces were estimated at less than $20,000.

Skirball curator Grossman says that with Judaica, the art often reflects not only Jewish symbols but also the majority culture where they were created.

“With a Chanukah lamp from Germany, you might find oak leaves on it; that’s part of the German tradition. Or you might find a Polish lamp that reflects the Polish tradition of using naturalistic forms of objects. We have one Chanukah lamp from Italy that has what looks like a crenellated roof that’s very much like rooflines of famous buildings from 16th and 17th century Italy,” she said. 

The Skirball collection also includes a German lamp shaped like the Arc de Triomphe, a lamp from Prague with a figure of Aaron dressed like a Catholic bishop and the 1813 Neo-classical Hirsch lamp, reminiscent of the Berlin opera house. 

For other families, their antique chanukiyot have been passed down from generation to generation. Annette Shapiro’s brother Arnold still uses the large menorah that belonged to their grandfather, David Familian, which she believes he brought with him from Russia in 1915. It is the same menorah they lit on Chanukah when they were children.

Dr. David and Fiona Hallegua gifted the Skirball their family Chanukah lamp in 2005 in memory of their grandparents, Satto and Gladys Koder. The lamp, which is made of hammered brass, is from Cochin, India, where the Koder family settled after leaving Baghdad around 1870. Prior to the lamp coming to the Skirball, the Cochin Chanukah Lamp was used by Dr. Hallegua’s family to celebrate Chanukah in India for more than 90 years.

It joins other family lamps at the Skirball, including one commissioned by Baron Carl Rothschild for his bride Mathilda that features the Rothschild crest including a hand grasping five arrows symbolizing the five Rothschild brothers.

But even among the collectors who don’t have family stories to go with their Chanukah lamps, there are some that hold personal significance.

For Mark Levy, that is the Statue of Liberty Chanukah lamp created by Manfred Anson, a German Jew and one of 20 young men given visas to Australia at the start of World War II. His parents survived Terezinstadt and one sister barely survived Bergen-Belsen. Anson now lives in New Jersey, and he and Levy have become close friends.

Anson became a collector of Statue of Liberty memorabilia in tribute to his new country. The Chanukah menorah he created for the Statue of Liberty centennial in 1986, which can be seen on display at the Skirball, is based on a cast of a Statue of Liberty souvenir from 1885, sold to help raise funds for the statue’s base.

Yet despite their celebrated collection, the Levy Chanukah tradition of more than half a century remains the same.

“We light a brass menorah we bought at Solomon’s on Fairfax,” Mark said.

“For $15 in 1956,” Peachy added.

Collectors Light Up Over Chanukah Lamps Read More »

Light the Wick

Chanukah raises many questions: from, “What did you get me?” to, “How do we relate to the dominant culture — in ancient times and today?” Among the most important spiritual inquiries during this Festival of Lights is the meaning of the lights themselves. The rabbis name “publicizing the miracle” as one main purpose. Hence, we put our chanukiyot in doorways and windows that face the street. According to tradition, one should not work by the light of Chanukah candles. The lights are meant to inspire awe, not efficiency. The mitzvah is to enjoy their beauty, rather than their utility.

Gazing at the Chanukah lights on a dark winter night, I notice both their smallness and their splendor — not unlike the Jewish people. Not unlike the band of Maccabees who “in those days at this time” fought against all odds, that we might be here now. Not unlike the seemingly insufficient vial of oil that lit up the rededicated Temple.

Light is never just light. It carries with it connotations of clarity, warmth, insight and nurturance. It is the end of the tunnel, the banisher of the benighted, the genesis of the world. “Torah Orah” — the instruction of God is light and enlightenment. Therefore and first, God said, “Let there be light.”

Light captured in the form of a lamp or a flame on the altar represents an evolutionary watershed: the domestication of fire. This advancement also conveys a spiritual message: human beings can partner with God in bringing light to the world.

The chanukiyah draws and expands on a prior source of light: the seven-branched menorah that was lit in the Tabernacle and then the Temple (Exodus 25:31-40 and 37:17-24; Leviticus 24:1-4). Carved from pure gold and lit with pure, pressed olive oil, it burned continually, from just before sundown until the next morning. The branches of the candelabrum were connected to the base through a central shaft. In our day, the menorah has become a symbol of the State of Israel.

The details have spiritual significance. Why olive oil? Jeremiah compares the Jewish people to an olive tree, and the rabbis elaborate: just as the olive provides light through oil, the Jewish people provide light through Torah (Jeremiah 11:16, Exodus Rabbah 36:1-3). And why must the oil be pressed? Like olives, Jews, too, can release the best of what is in us when pressed.

For mystics, oil symbolizes streaming, infinite abundance from God above. The kabbalistic system of sefirot (emanations) maps out three upper and seven lower essential qualities and expressions of the Divine. The branches of the menorah are understood to carry the light of the seven lower, more accessible attributes. The central shaft, according to the 13th century kabbalist Asher Ben David and his followers, represents tiferet (glory or beauty), which is also called the “middle line,” since its center spot in the configuration of the sefirot reflects its role as mediator and bridge between emanations.

The menorah “passed the torch” to the chanukiyah, which continues to promote abundance, light and oil, in all their meanings. But there are also vital discontinuities. Unlike the menorah, the chanukiyah is lit only at nightfall because, from the mystical perspective, its light shines in the darkest hour of deepest exile. Chanukah lights represent hope and faith against all odds.

The number of candles lit for Chanukah is eight, rather than seven. The seven sefirot are still in play, but they are surpassed. In Jewish numerology, seven signifies a complete cycle. Eight goes beyond creation and completion to infinity. A classic example is brit milah (circumcision). Days one through seven correspond to the physical world (the natural body), while day eight represents the metaphysical world (the perfected body; supernatural spirit and covenant).

Thus, Chanukah candles don’t just emit lumens. They go beyond recalling, recreating or even rededicating the light from the Temple and the Tabernacle before it. On Chanukah, the candelabrum burns not only “continually,” but also miraculously. Chanukah lamps or candles shed and spread infinite, divine light. They draw on the supernal light of Genesis (1:3-5, 14-19), the light that is sown for the righteous (Psalms 97:11), the light of upper, seemingly distant, sefirot.

Most Jewish holidays begin under the light of the full moon. Even Purim, the other “minor historical festival,” takes place in the middle of the Jewish month, when the moon is full. Shavuot is an exception because it occurs seven weeks after Passover; nevertheless, the moon can be seen in the night sky.

The Festival of Lights occurs against a backdrop of both lunar and solar darkness. Early in the the holiday, the moon is not visible. And Chanukah generally falls on or near winter solstice, the day with the fewest hours of sun.

In utter darkness, it’s tempting to give up or wait passively for a change. Yet, as Rabbi Nachman of Bratslav reminds us, it is precisely in the pitch black that you can see even the tiniest point of light. The Maccabees didn’t allow dim chances to diminish their commitment to the light of Torah and freedom; nor should we.

The talmudic story of the oil has become a familiar “fable.” But consider it afresh. You have one vial of purified oil. It’s an eight-day process to prepare a new supply. You want to conduct an eight-day rededication ceremony, to make up for the Sukkot holiday cycle, which many people missed, due to the war, and to echo the inauguration of sacrifices in the Tabernacle, which took place on the eighth day (Leviticus 9). How do you proceed?

The logical answer is to announce that a rededication ceremony will take place in one week. Otherwise, you will light the Menorah with pomp and circumstance, and then, on day two, the Temple will go dark.

One message of the story of the oil is: take that risk. When there is oil, light the wick. Use your vessel. Don’t try to hoard or save light. Have faith that each day will bring its own oil — its own riches and anointing.

About 350 years before the Maccabees, at the time of the prophet Zachariah, the first Temple had been destroyed, and there was a chance that Zerubavel, governor of Judah, could build a second Temple. An angel came to Zachariah and showed him a gold Menorah with a bowl that poured oil from above onto the seven branches. On either side of this Menorah were olive trees with ready, abundant fruit. The angel explained the vision this way: “This is the word of Adonai to Zerubavel, saying: ‘Not by might, nor by power, but by My spirit, says Adonai of hosts.’” (Zachariah 4:6)

How will we ever rebuild and rejuvenate our temples, if not by God’s spirit?

Oil and light pour gently down from above. God will not coerce us into seeing or accepting blessings; yet, what we need is at hand. Infinity, by definition, is enough. This holiday, may you enjoy, publicize and transmit the light. A

Rabbi Debra Orenstein is spiritual leader of Makom Ohr Shalom synagogue (makom.org) and a frequent scholar-in-residence. Her Web site, RabbiDebra.com, offers Chanukah resources, gifts and teachings.

Light the Wick Read More »

Jewish Imagery Drives Design for Artist Ruth Merritt

For Ruth Merritt, a lifelong relationship with art and Judaism began with a misunderstanding about a Hebrew school assignment: to copy the first paragraph of the Amidah. At 6 years old, Merritt took that directive literally, reproducing the exact shape of the Hebrew letters. Although she didn’t finish copying the paragraph — and worried that her teacher would punish her for not completing her homework — she discovered that she enjoyed drawing the letters. But instead of a reprimand, she received accolades and support.

“They grew up at the same time, and I grew up with both of them,” Merritt said, referring to her love of art and Judaism.

Much of her Merritt’s work focuses on and incorporates Hebrew letters. “The Hebrew alphabet is one of the most authentic and one of the oldest Jewish design elements,” Merritt said. “That really resonates with me.”

Although she studied both Judaism and art as a young adult, attending the College of Jewish Studies at the Jewish Theological Seminary, the Art Institute of Chicago and the University of Judaism’s School of Fine Arts, it wasn’t until Merritt’s own children were in school that she began to really develop an art business. At first, she designed Jewish New Year cards — something she had done since childhood — ketubot and bar mitzvah invitations. As her children grew, Merritt also grew as an artist, learning new techniques like calligraphy and papercutting, and taking on larger, more complex projects.

Those projects include the lettering on Aron Kodesh doors at Temple Isaiah in West Los Angeles, designing a Torah mantle at Sinai Temple in Westwood, where she also designed the steel sculpture “Memorial to the Six Million,” and the faceted glass windows, “Creation: The First Seven Days,” in the Kamenir Chapel at Mount Sinai Memorial Park in Simi Valley.

The series of seven windows depicts each day of creation, represented with Hebrew letters, colors and background images. The colors of the letters, red through purple, reflect the spectrum of the rainbow, the symbol of hope in the biblical story of the flood.

“I used the symbolism of creation as a reaffirmation of life, even in view of the fact that people are in that chapel to lay someone to rest.”

It took Merritt almost a year to study and develop the theme for the Kamenir Chapel’s seven windows. Early on, she settled on the concept of the creation story with the largest window representing Shabbat. When she finally started sketching, it took only two weeks to get from the first rendering to the finished drawings.

Merritt said she had to walk a fine line when using imagery in the windows so as not to offend the Orthodox community while still conveying the narrative. She settled on using Hebrew letters as the primary imagery, although she believes that symbolic art is a part of Jewish tradition.

“The popular conception is that drawing images is contrary to Judaism, but I believe that has been misinterpreted,” Merritt said, adding that she believes the biblical instruction to create beautiful things in connection with the Temple is referring to art. “I think they meant not to make idol images, but there are ancient synagogues with drawings on their walls.”

The larger Shabbat window brings together all of the colors of the six smaller windows with the image of two flames.

“The reason for the two flames is to represent each way the Bible tells you to celebrate Shabbat,” Merritt said. “First, it tells us to observe the Sabbath day and keep it holy, and later it tells us to remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy.”

(Merritt’s “Memorial to the Six Million” at Sinai Temple uses similar imagery. The sculpture has six branches of letters using two shins, symbolic of shesh — Hebrew for six — to form tongues of flame.)

The faceted windows were Merritt’s first foray into glasswork, but she enjoys the challenge of working in new mediums, seeing it as a way to expand her creative horizons. Merritt and the project director chose faceted glass — a technique using chunks of glass hammered to create facets that reflect light or set in concrete in a mosaic pattern — as opposed to stained glass, to tie them stylistically to the faceted glass windows in the sanctuary at Sinai Temple, which was built in the late 1950s to early 1960s. As it turned out, the same Pasadena company that fashioned those original windows, Judson Studios, also brought Merritt’s sketches from paper to glass with the grandson of the man who worked on the original project helping to develop the creation windows, bringing the whole project full circle.

When asked if she would ever consider a commissioned piece that did not involve Jewish themes, Merritt barely pauses.

“I don’t know that I could,” she said, expressing her deep connection to Judaism by explaining that her parents were Zionists who met in Hebrew school and she and her husband met at a Jewish camp. “I have to feel something for what I’m doing.”

Jewish Imagery Drives Design for Artist Ruth Merritt Read More »

Why Christians Refuse to Hate: My Experiences in Mugabe’s Zimbabwe

Visiting Zimbabwe can be a heart-wrenching experience. It is a beautiful land of warm and soft-spoken people. But hovering over the landscape at all times is the specter of extreme poverty and political oppression. The poverty is merely tragic. But the political oppression is brutal, murderous, and criminal. Most of the people I met went quiet with fear on the subject of Robert Mugabe, afraid that a stranger may be a government agent and any criticism can make you the next target of his thugs.

One innocent victim was Ben Freeth, a sunny Christian farmer who, after publishing an article in the Western press about the illegal and murderous farm seizures being carried out by Mugabe’s Zanu (PF) party, was savagely beaten and later watched as his farm was burnt to the ground. When I met Freeth in Harare last week he described to me and my friends from the Christian relief organization ROCK of Africa who were hosting us how, in the midst of the assault that fractured his skull, he suddenly reached out and touched the feet of his assailants and said, “Bless you, bless you.” My Christian counterparts were deeply moved by this quintessential story of Christian love for one’s enemy. I, however, was aghast.

Ben is a hero who, at the risk of his life continues to serve as a spokesman for the thousands of white families who have been brutally dispossessed of their land and many of whom have been killed. But I could not help but challenge this aspect of the story. “Every ounce of blessing we have in our hearts has to be reserved for the all the AIDS orphans that I saw dotting this once-proud land. These wretched thugs deserve not our blessing but our contempt, not our love but out hatred.” A debate broke out in the room. I alone maintained my position. My dear friend Glen Megill, a saint who founded ROCK of Africa, said, “Shmuley, Jesus told us to love our enemies.” Yes, I said. But your enemy is the guy who steals your parking space. G-d’s enemies are those who murder His children. And Jesus never said to love G-d’s enemies. To the contrary, the book of Proverbs is clear, “The fear of the Lord is to hate evil.” Psalms reinforces the point.  “Those who love G-d hate evil.”

This is something that has always puzzled me. My Christian colleagues at ROCK of Africa are angels. In ten days we distributed corn seed to the poorest villages, gave out mosquito nets, hugged and prayed with AIDS victims, and put on large feasts for hundreds of hungry villagers and children who dwell in mud huts. We colored pictures with orphans in Harare and gave them toys and presents. The hearts of evangelical Christians are enormous repositories of loving-kindness. But why must the heart be so wide as to extend to Mugabe’s killer henchmen? What place have murderers earned in our hearts? The same is true of my many Christian brothers who have told me that their faith commands them to love Osama bin Laden.

My fear is that such distortions of Christian teaching undermine our resolve to confront evil regimes. When Jesus enjoined to ‘Turn the other cheek,’ he meant to petty slights and humiliations. Does any sane person really imagine that he meant to ignore and overlook mass murder?

Mugabe has brought a reign of terror to Zimbabwe, making its name synonymous with wholesale slaughter, political intimidation, brutalization of opposition elements, and illegal land grabs. The country is now the poorest nation on earth, with an annual per capita GDP of just $200. Donor agencies estimate that more than 5 million Zimbabweans, representing almost half the population, currently rely on food handouts. The stores are half empty and last year they were completely empty. The ATMs often have no cash. Many of the gas stations have run out for the day. Even Victoria Falls is nearly bereft of tourists.

The black population is noble, extremely welcoming, and exhibit the nobility of spirit of those who have suffered much but complain little. A white population of approximately 4000, down from about 250,000, still remains. They seem to love Zimbabwe, consider it their home, and insist on staying.

They are, of course, hopeful signs, especially the new unity government which has brought Morgan Tsvangirai and Arthur Mutambara into shared power with Mugabe. I interviewed Mutambara, a 43-year-old former Rhodes scholar whom I knew from Oxford and is now the country’s deputy Prime Minister (the full interview is available on my website). A compelling man of vision, eloquence, and academic brilliance, he is convinced that within two years Zimbabwe will be completely ready for free and fair elections. I hope he is right.

But farm confiscations continue and Mugabe’s gangsters still terrorize political opponents. And the only hope for Mugabe to be completely and utterly marginalized is if the international community comes together to push him off the scene. This will not come if the man does not chill our bones. We must not bless but curse his rule.

I don’t do well with tyranny. I have undisguised contempt for tyrants and knowing that I was staying just a few miles from Mugabe’s house spooked me throughout my stay in Harare. As you drive by his home you are told that you are not allowed to look for fear of attracting suspicion and being arrested. Highly-educated locals told me there is a law that says that you cannot stare at his motorcade either and that his guards have been known to fire on those who do. Is this a man whom my Christian friends tell me I must love?

No, I refuse. I will go further. Anyone who loves the wicked is complicit in their wickedness. Anyone who blesses the cruel is an accomplice to their cruelty.

I choose to bless the courageous people of Zimbabwe rather than the tyrant who has slaughtered and impoverished them. I choose to bless a country like America which fights to liberate the weak in Iraq and the oppressed in Afghanistan rather than the Saddams and the Taliban who have brutalized them. Most of all, I choose to bless people like Ben Freeth that one day the long arm of justice will catch up to his tormentors and they will discover that while G-d is indeed a long-suffering G-d, for those who continue to slaughter innocents He is also a G-d of justice.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, founder of This World: The Values Network was on a relief mission to Zimbabwe with Rock of Africa. To read his blogs and see videos of the visit, go to Why Christians Refuse to Hate: My Experiences in Mugabe’s Zimbabwe Read More »

The Ner Tamid: An Appreciation

I have a special affinity for the ner tamid (eternal light) suspended above the aron kodesh (holy ark) in synagogues throughout the world. My ner tamid bond dates from 1979 and traces its roots to a rookie rabbi error.

A friend and I were invited to spend Shabbat in a Jewish community in upstate New York during our second year of rabbinical studies at the Jewish Theological Seminary. The small Conservative congregation was rabbi-less and asked the seminary’s Leaders Training Fellowship to send in reinforcements from the mother lode of their movement.

So it was that two rabbis-in-training and a handful of high school students from United Synagogue Youth were dispatched on a mission to bring Yiddishkayt to the Jews of Auburn, N.Y. There we found a beautiful synagogue and a community of devoted volunteers who did everything for their beloved shul. Our host embodied the ideals of dedication and commitment, acting alternately as rabbi, cantor, gabbai, custodian, president and czar of the congregation.

Everyone gathered in the synagogue Friday night for the Kabbalat Shabbat service, at which I delivered the sermon. The weekly Torah portion included a reference to kindling lamps, which afforded me the opportunity to comment on the ner tamid in the small sanctuary. In the climatic moment of my sermon, I proclaimed with youthful exuberance: “Just as the ner tamid shines brightly in this synagogue, so too may the light of Judaism continue to shine brightly in your community!”

I expected nods of approval and mumbles of “Amen” from the assemblage. Instead, I heard gasps of astonishment and beheld horrified looks on the faces of the congregants. I turned around to face the ark and instantly recognized the cause of their communal dismay. The light bulb in the ner tamid had burned out, and no one had noticed this before the service.

Our flustered host jumped up from his seat and apologized profusely for the holy oversight. He was embarrassed in the presence of his guests and community. I felt terrible for the distress I unwittingly brought to our host and his congregation.

Thirty years later, I still vividly recall this sacred equipment malfunction. While I never returned to Auburn, I am confident that the congregation did not endure a repeat of their Shabbat ner tamid burnout. For my part, I learned a valuable lesson for my nascent rabbinic career: Always check your props before you begin a service or speech.

When I visit synagogues around Los Angeles, I do check out the props, especially the eternal lamp above the ark. Historicallly, the ner tamid was not always suspended in this honored spot. After the Second Temple’s destruction, Jews began to kindle perpetual lights in their synagogues in accordance with the biblical command to keep fire glowing continuously. The ner tamid was originally placed on the western wall opposite the ark containing the Torah scrolls. Later it was moved into a niche near the aron kodesh and eventually to its current place of honor above the ark.

Today, as in the past, the ner tamid symbolizes the perpetual Divine presence in our houses of prayer, learning and assembly. Most eternal lamps are electric bulbs encased in artistic creations of precious metal, fine glass or other materials. Some communities have restored the traditional practice of oil-burning lamps, with members of the congregation taking turns to replenish the oil much as the Kohanim (priests) did in the Temple. A “Misheberach” prayer recited at the Shabbat morning Torah service makes special mention of those who are honored with the maintenance and upkeep of the oil-burning ner tamid.

Of late, a growing number of rabbis and congregational leaders have installed solar-powered eternal lamps in their synagogues. One of the first to do so in Los Angeles was Kehillat Israel, a Reconstructionist congregation in Pacific Palisades, whose vibrant ner tamid adorns a modern, aesthetically appealing sacred space. Lighting a ner tamid by solar power is a visible symbol of a synagogue’s commitment to environmental awareness and can stimulate further “green” initiatives in the congregation and throughout the community.

Earlier this year, the Board of Rabbis partnered with the South Coast Air Quality Management District in a solar ner tamid campaign. Nearly a dozen area congregations shared a $10,000 grant to defray the costs of converting the ner tamid in their sanctuaries from electric to solar power. Several synagogues unveiled their solar eternal lights at ceremonies celebrating Birkat HaHammah, the “Blessing the Sun” ritual held once every 28 years on the Jewish calendar. It was a unique way to celebrate the power of the sun by harnessing its energy to light this ancient Jewish symbol.

I have seen nearly every shape, size and style of eternal lamps — traditional and contemporary; oil, electric, and solar; metallic, glass, ceramic and Plexiglas. My personal ner tamid preferences are eclectic. I don’t like perpetual lights that are ostentatious and clash with the ark, amud (lectern) and other synagogue appurtenances. I do appreciate more modest eternal lights that are in harmony with the bimah and call attention to the ark, the centerpiece of the sanctuary.

Like its forebearer the menorah, the ner tamid symbolizes a holy fire that has burned for millennia in the midst of the people of Israel. It reminds us that synagogues are small sanctuaries built upon the ancient foundation of the Holy Temple. The sacred flame of the ner tamid summons us to brighten our lives and our world with the light of Torah.

Rabbi Mark S. Diamond is the executive vice president of The Board of Rabbis of Southern California.

The Ner Tamid: An Appreciation Read More »

Embrace the Dark, Then Light a Candle

Kislev, the month when we begin to light the candles of Chanukah, is the month that contains the year’s longest nights and shortest days. In Kislev we begin in darkness, like all of creation. With less brightness from above, we contemplate the essence that preceded God’s command: “Let there be light.” We have a personal experience of that time of Infinite Potential, when the Divine Mystery and darkness were all that was, as we relive those moments when the lights of creation had not yet been called into being.

Humans today don’t spend very much time in the dark. Because our days are easily lit by electric lights, we have lost our organic connection to the flow of sunshine and shadow that naturally shape time. Perhaps more familiarity with the night could help us become more attuned to and accepting of life’s natural ebb and flow. Instead, we are blinded by light. We see all that is not bathed in brightness as aberration or failure. This stigmatizes those who suffer. Cast out of the light, they wonder if they are responsible for their own pain. They feel isolated and unable to reach out to the community from their dark time. This makes it possible for far too many of us to live a life of denial, avoiding the more subtle wisdom of that which might be hidden or shaded.

Our cultural pursuit of light can obscure the fertility of mysterious, hidden spaces and ultimately rob us of our own potency. This is especially true in the month of Kislev when there is a dissonance between our instincts and our imperatives. The organic world calls us to slow down and go inside — both physically and spiritually — to spend more time inside our homes, focused on our inner light. But the social world is calling for more, more, more — more parties, more shopping, more food, more activity, with tiny electric lights tied to every house and every tree. We push ourselves to keep up with a social schedule that belies our deepest nature.

We are always looking for something brighter. When people pray for healing, they often pray for the light. Spiritual seekers aim for “enlightenment.” But what is often needed is what theologian Matthew Fox calls “endarkening.” Just like the biblical story of the beginnings of the world, growth, change and creativity are rooted in the mystery of darkness. Stem cells become organs in the dark cells of our bodies. Seeds germinate deep in the ground. Healing begins in dark mystery seemingly impenetrable to beams of brightness. Even research, which needs a brilliant spark of inspiration, begins with a question that is posed to a possibility that is hidden in darkness. Lingering in that darkness, we meet the fears that our early human ancestors must have faced before they had conquered the enigmas of warmth and light — before they truly understood that the sun would rise each morning.

While it might seem counter to the culture in which we live, it is possible to discover in Kislev’s extended nighttime an innate comfort, as we tune into the sensations of our bodies and the rising and falling of our breath. Meditating in the darkness, we contemplate a world in which human experience was more closely bound to the tides of day and night — a time with no artificial light or traffic noise distracting us from the murmurs of creation. To listen to that wholeness is to hear the Shema uttered by the universe itself. It is to feel the mixture of fear and wonder that is held in the Hebrew word, yirah, which is so often translated as awe. From this place, we strike a match and light the first candle of Chanukah.

Chanukah, which begins on one of the last nights of Kislev, comes in this dark time. Its message is one of human potential. Life in the shadows, where we struggle with our fears and doubts and pay attention to our dreams and yearnings, ultimately blesses us with knowledge of our unique strengths. We learn that, like the Maccabees, we must take matters into our own hands. We learn that when the lights above are less accessible, we must light candles below. The act of touching the flame of a match to the wick of a candle provides us with an opportunity to explore the miracle of human empowerment.

Mystics speak of “theurgy,” the possibility that our actions might have an influence on Holiness. There is even a radical theology that says that God is present only where we, humans, let God in. Our tradition tells us that our souls are God’s lamp and that mutual need is what calls both sides of the human-God equation into being. If this is true, we must not underestimate the importance of lighting that first light of Chanukah.

Coming out of darkness to light that first candle is a profound act of faith. From our place below, wrapped in nocturnal sensitivity, we mimic the first act of creation. We take responsibility for the work begun at the beginning of time, when God said, “Let there be light.” With our own hands we strike the match to light the candles of Kislev to illuminate our journey as we focus human potential to summon the light of Holiness as we walk in God’s ways. A

Rabbi Anne Brener is an L.A.-based psychotherapist and spiritual counselor who helps communities design caring committees. She is the author of “Mourning & Mitzvah: Walking the Mourner’s Path” (Jewish Lights, 1993 and 2001) and a faculty member with the Academy for Jewish Religion, California and the Morei Derekh program for Yedidya —  Center for Jewish Spiritual Direction. She is on the advisory board of the Kalsman Institute of Judaism and Medicine at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion. Brener can be reached at {encode=”mekamot@aol.com” title=”mekamot@aol.com”}.

Embrace the Dark, Then Light a Candle Read More »

‘Big Brother’ swamps Shalit film on Israeli TV

The Israeli version of “Big Brother” was an easy TV ratings winner in Israel over a film about Gilad Shalit’s family trying to secure his release.

Some 10.6 percent of television viewers watched the heavily advertised documentary “A Family in Captivity” on Channel 10, Ha’aretz reported. The documentary about the family of Shalit, the Israeli soldier who was captured by Hamas in 2006 and has been held since in Gaza, was broadcast Sunday night without commercials.

By contrast, some 26.1 percent of viewers tuned in to the popular reality series “Big Brother” on Channel 2.

The documentary originally had been scheduled to air a month ago in a better time slot, but was postponed after a request from the Shalit family, a Channel 10 official told Ha’aretz.

‘Big Brother’ swamps Shalit film on Israeli TV Read More »