fbpx

November 10, 2009

Where the Taliban fighters are buried

Taliban Fighters Surrender In Herat

Dexter Filkins, still a stud.

Here he brings us up to speed on a withering Taliban cemetery:

The graveyard, next to this tiny village north of Kabul, sits a few miles from what was once the front line against the rebels who fought the Taliban after the group captured Kabul in 1996. Those rebels, then known as the Northern Alliance, finally overran the Taliban and captured Kabul — with American help — in November 2001.

Eight years after the last fighter was buried here, the cemetery has fallen into decrepitude. Many of the gravestones are broken and smashed — the vandalism, the villagers say, of a marauding anti-Taliban militia. Weeds and rocks and tattered prayer flags obscure much of what is left. The villagers of Tarakhel, though Taliban enthusiasts, have given up trying to care for the place.

(skip)

And they are with them now. The Taliban cemetery may have fallen into disrepair, but the villagers say the Taliban are fighting the good fight, just as they were in bygone days.

“They’ll be back, you know,” Mr. Zahir said.

Read the rest here.

Where the Taliban fighters are buried Read More »

Obama shifts into Israel’s corner, but tries not to show it

When the White House chief of staff took to the podium at the federations’ General Assembly to call for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations without preconditions, he sounded almost exactly like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a day earlier.

“All issues should be resolved through negotiations,” Rahm Emanuel said Tuesday to delegates at the Jewish Federations of North America’s annual meeting. “No one should allow the issue of settlements to distract from the overarching goal of lasting peace.”

On Monday, Netanyahu used the GA podium to appeal to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to return to the negotiating table.

“Let us seize the moment to reach an historic agreement; let us begin talks immediately,” Netanyahu said.

Palestinian Authority leaders say they will not negotiate unless Israel commits to a full settlement freeze. To some extent, the Obama administration is to blame for the intransigence; the Palestinians adopted that position only once the Obama administration insisted earlier this year that Israel commit to a full freeze.

U.S. administration officials have since tempered their position, praising the concessions Netanyahu is willing to make on Jewish settlement construction in the West Bank.

“No Israeli government has been so willing to restrain settlement activity,” Emanuel said Tuesday.

The U.S. position shift, which Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton also expressed last week in Jerusalem, has angered many in the Arab world and left the Palestinian leadership in a difficult spot. If Palestinian leaders give up their insistence for a full settlement freeze before returning to negotiations, they will be seen as betraying the cause. If they hold firm, peace talks will remain stalled.

The convergence of the Israeli and U.S. positions on Israeli-Palestinian negotiations comes amid some concern about the Obama-Netanyahu relationship.

Their meeting Monday night was under unusual circumstances, taking place well past the time Netanyahu could exploit a handshake with Obama for Israel’s evening news back home—and there wasn’t even a public handshake. In a rare move, the White House skipped both the standard quick photo op before the meeting and the post-meeting Q & A session with reporters.

Few specifics emerged from the meeting. Obama and Netanyahu spoke alone for an hour of the 100-minute meeting, and afterward Netanyahu uncharacteristically canceled his traditional briefing for the Israeli press corps. Emanuel called the meeting “positive” but offered little elaboration.

The unusual circumstances of the meeting reflect the predicament faced by both sides.

It would have been unseemly for Netanyahu, who was going to be in Washington for the General Assembly, to swing through town without having an audience with the U.S. president. But with the Obama administration trying to downplay its shift toward the Israeli position on Israeli-Palestinian peace talks—Clinton was forced to make an unscheduled trip to Cairo last week to allay Arab fears that Washington was easing the pressure on Israel—a high-profile meeting with the Israeli leader followed by a joint news conference could only do harm.

Thus, in his GA speech, Emanuel at once tried to assure the Jewish audience that the bond between the U.S. and Israeli administrations remained strong while still making clear that the United States is pressing Israel to make concessions to the Palestinians.

Emanuel went to great lengths to make the case for Obama’s support of Israel, noting the “unbreakable” U.S.-Israeli bond. But both he and Alan Solow, the chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and a backer of Obama from the launch of his political career in the mid-1990s, also spoke of natural “differences and discussions” between the two governments.

“Unilateral actions should be avoided and cannot dictate the outcome,” Emanuel said. He added that “negotiations must address permanent-status issues: borders, refugees and Jerusalem.”

Israeli officials do not want to negotiate over Jerusalem and the right of return to Israel of Palestinian refugees.

The cancellation of Obama’s planned GA speech on Tuesday did not appear to be part of any calculated strategy; the president changed his plans to attend a memorial service Tuesday in Texas for victims of the Fort Hood shooting rampage.

Once the scheduling change was made, the White House put together a reception for Jewish leaders on Monday evening. Obama came but he did not talk foreign policy. Instead, he gave a 20-minute discursion on Jewish values of charity and the importance of health care reform.

In his New York Times column over the weekend, Thomas Friedman suggested that the president withdraw from Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking until the parties themselves are ready to come to the negotiating table.

But in a broad-ranging interview Tuesday on “The Charlie Rose Show” on PBS, Clinton made it clear the Obama administration intends to stay involved.

“They want us to be engaged, to be leading, both by example and through engagement,” she said of the Israelis and Palestinians. “As complicated and as difficult as they might be, we have to be there, we have to be working.

“Now we may be more engaged or less engaged, depending upon our assessment. We may leave the parties to themselves for periods of time and stand on the sidelines, or we may be intensely working with them. That’s a calibration. But the overall fact is the United States must be present.”

Bureau chief Ron Kampeas and staff writer Eric Fingerhut contributed to this report from Washington.

Obama shifts into Israel’s corner, but tries not to show it Read More »

Failing to Connect the Terror Dots—Political Correctness Run Amuck

I just watched President Obama’s talk to an audience assembled at Fort Hood to honor the memory of thirteen service members killed by army Major Nidal Malik Hasan.

Given the legal complexities yet to play out at Hasan’s upcoming trial, the president probably struck the proper tone.  However, he avoided the implications of failed intelligence by responsible agencies and why, given the shooter’s history and past terrorist sympathy, no one connected the dots.

Both the FBI and military intelligence were aware that the major was communicating on a frequent basis with a rabidly-militant Muslim cleric in Yemen and yet choose to downplay the connections. 

But why?  Has “diversity” and “sensitivity” toward Muslims become something that has trumped common sense – not only in the nation’s corporate sector, the mainstream media, university campuses and government, but now within the military as well?

Army Chief of Staff, General George Casey, made the rounds of this past ” title=”Dr. Phil”>Dr. Phil, presented the Fort Hood killer as a victim.  The pop television psychologist argued that “stress” may have been the cause, along with the pressure Hasan “endured” while counseling returning service personnel.  However, what appeared to send Dr. Phil over the top was a guest who happened to mention Major Hasan’s religion.  Dr. Phil reacted to this revelation as if the guest had used the N-word.

But why is there reluctance to identify Major Hasan’s murder spree as the act of a Muslin fanatic?  Here is a life-long Muslim who had ongoing links to Anwar al Awalaki, a well-known international terrorist figure, was someone who once gave a lecture in which he stated that infidels should be beheaded and have oil poured down their throats, once attended the same San Diego mosque as two of the 9/11 hijackers, hands out copies of the Koran shortly before the shooting, and yells “Allahu Akbar” while mowing down his victims.

Yet, the FBI has offered this mealy-mouthed assessment. “The investigation to date has not identified a motive, and a number of possibilities remain under consideration…”   

So, according to this pronouncement, Nidal Malik Hasan’s religion had nothing to do with his actions.  If this is true, then religion also played no role in the actions of the nineteen 9/11 terrorists, and Osama bin Laden’s devout religious beliefs are coincidental to his declared war against America and the West.

It’s time to push aside this kind of political correctness.  Misplaced “sensitivity” will prove increasingly dangerous.  Don’t agree? – just ask the dozens of surviving victims of Major Hasan’s deadly attack.

Failing to Connect the Terror Dots—Political Correctness Run Amuck Read More »

Time for Miracles, Time for Adam Lambert to save ‘2012’ [VIDEO]

Just when I thought the disaster flick, “2012” couldn’t get any more unappealing, they do something like this…

and TOTALLY REDEEM THEMSELVES.

In my mind, if you’re going to destroy God’s beautiful creations through over-the-top special effects, you better have a wicked soundtrack to accompany it.

Not sure what is more of a travesty though, the events that unfold in 2012 or the fact that Adam Lambert didn’t win American Idol.  Either way, we can all be glad that Lambert has come to rescue what seems like yet another sequel to Independence Day, Godzilla, The Day After Tomorrow, and 10000 BC. (Note: This movie will probably be just as fun and thrilling as all of those previously listed—they were all directed by Roland Emmerich.)

Here’s the synopsis from Time for Miracles, Time for Adam Lambert to save ‘2012’ [VIDEO] Read More »

What really happened at the Reform biennial in Toronto

The atmosphere was a lot more subdued at this year’s Reform biennial than it was two years ago in San Diego.

Nearly 6,000 people turned out in 2007 to celebrate the largest Jewish religious movement in North America, festively wending their way through a conference so huge it was barely navigable.

This time 3,000 attendees, including more than 600 volunteers from the Toronto Reform community, seemed to be more focused on finding ways to build their congregations and improve their offerings.

“We are a bit more somber than at biennials past,” Union for Reform Judaism President Rabbi Eric Yoffie declared during his Saturday morning sermon, as he described the economic downturn that is forcing Jewish institutions nationwide to slash budgets and restructure.

For its part, the union has collapsed its 14 North American regions into four geographic districts. Most lay leaders said they were reserving judgment on the system, although one East Coast rabbi grumbled that his district head is now in Dallas, a three-hour plane ride away.

In June, the URJ headquarters in New York dismantled its departments and replaced them with consultants, who ran booths in the main conference hall to meet with lay leaders seeking advice in areas from synagogue mergers to youth engagement. The consultation booths were fairly full throughout the four-day gathering.

* * *

This was the first time in 30 years that the Reform biennial was held in Canada, and Toronto made the most of it.

In an opening-night video that should have been titled (G)O Canada, the overwhelmingly south-of-the-border audience was reminded that Canadian Reform history is just as illustrious as that of its southern cousin. Gunther Plaut, author of the movement’s seminal Torah commentary, came from Toronto’s Holy Blossom Temple, as did Maurice Eisendrath, the mid-century president of what was then called the Union of American Hebrew Congregations.

Reform Judaism “is different” in Canada, a parade of Canadian rabbis proclaimed on screen. The fact that they do not recognize patrilineal descent was glossed over, but viewers were reminded that Canadian Reform Jews are more Zionist, more traditional and spend more time in Israel than American Reform Jews.

Take that, Yankee fans.

* * *

Movement conferences are a time for pronouncing new initiatives, but how often are these programs followed up? How many Reform Jews followed Yoffie’s 2005 advice to “lovingly, gently” encourage non-Jewish spouses to convert? How many took his 2007 challenge to make their Shabbats “more meaningful?”

No answers there, but the union’s Nothing But Nets campaign to fight malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa, launched at the 2007 biennial, has saved actual lives. More than 60,000 of them, according to former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who spoke live via video to the conference.

Malaria causes more than 1 million deaths per year, mostly in Africa. Nothing But Nets is a global campaign to combat the spread of the disease by providing insecticide-treated bed nets to low-income families. A net that costs $10 protects a home. The URJ has raised $580,000 since the 2007 biennial, exceeding its goal of half a million dollars.

That’s not talk; that’s tachlis.

* * *

Blair, who spoke on behalf of the Tony Blair Faith Foundation, which he founded last year to promote understanding and social action between the major faiths, was one of several high-profile speakers to address the biennial.

When moderator Rabbi David Saperstein, director of the Reform movement’s Religious Action Center, had a chance to ask Blair a question, it wasn’t about Blair’s role as the peace envoy to the Middle East of the Quartet (Russia, the United Nations, the United States and the European Union). Rather it was about the 2006 Oscar-winning film “The Queen,” a dramatization of Blair’s first days in office. Did actor Michael Sheen, who played Blair, get him right? Saperstein wanted to know.

Blair, clearly taken by surprise, confessed that he hadn’t actually seen the movie.

“When it came out, I had my weekly audience with the queen,” he said. “She said, ‘I hear there’s a film.’ There was a pause, and I said, ‘Yes, Mum, there is.’ Pause. Then she said, ‘I don’t think I’ll be watching it.’ Another pause, then she said, ‘Will you?’ And I said, ‘Of course not.’ ”

* * *

Dr. Ruth Westheimer wouldn’t have let the queen of England tell her what to do. The diminutive sex therapist, Holocaust survivor and ex-Haganah fighter held forth at a standing-room-only lunch study session Saturday delivering tips on healthy sexuality in her inimitable German accent, which she works to great effect.

During lunch, she told the crowd, a cantor started talking to her about sex.

“I said, not at the table,” Westheimer scolded. “I come from Frankfurt Am Main, from a very Orthodox family. I talk explicitly about sex, but not at the table!”

The rabbis of the Talmud were very wise about sex, she said, as well as everything else.

“They said a man may have sexual intercourse with his wife in any way he wants, even from behind,” she told the audience, pointing out that many women find this position highly pleasurable.

“Now I want all of you in relationships—don’t pick up someone in the hallway, I’m very old-fashioned—to go to your hotel rooms tonight and try a new position,” she ordered. “And call me up afterwards.”

As the jovial crowd spilled out of the meeting room, one congregational president with his arm around his wife announced, “We’re going to do our homework now.”

* * *

The Women of Reform Judaism, which also held its biennial in Toronto last week, launched a program to twin Reform Sisterhoods in North America with their counterparts in Israel.

Sisterhoods are new in Israel’s 25 Reform congregations. One of the five female rabbis from those congregations at last week’s conference said that Israeli women had worked so hard for equality it felt strange to create women-only organizations.

WRJ national board member Resa Davids, who now lives in Jerusalem, used the example of Israel’s 2-year-old Reform Sisterhood at Or Hadash in Haifa to convince 15 other congregations to follow suit.

The next step was to build relationships between those fledgling groups and the more established ones in North America. Instead of a one-way flow of money, Davids wrote up a list of 20 sample projects Sisterhoods in both countries could engage in together. One project suggested sending dreidels to each other and using the different lettering—the “shin” for “sham,” meaning “there,” used on dreidels in the Diaspora, versus the “peh” for “po,” or “here,” on Israeli dreidels—to teach about the differences between Israeli and Diaspora Judaism.

By the end of the hourlong conference session, every Reform Sisterhood in Israel had a North American twin. Some had two or three.

* * *

A big aspect of the URJ restructuring involves greater reliance on the Internet. In his Saturday sermon, Yoffie asked Reform congregations to set up their own synagogue blogs, which he said should be used to stimulate real conversations between members “and not be just an electronic version of your temple newsletter.”

Three separate workshops on Web building and social media were packed, as younger delegates helped talk older delegates through the minefields of Twitter and Evite.

In one session, the audience oohed and aahed as Rabbi Jonathan Blake of the Westchester Reform Temple in Scarsdale, N.Y., displayed his Facebook page on the big screen and showed what happened when Rabbi Phyllis Sommer, a Chicago-area Jewish parenting blogger sitting in the room, tweeted her comments. Look, he pointed out, there are her remarks right there on the screen!

Blake uses Facebook to generate Jewish discussion, he said, noting that he links to a short video blog he prepares every week on the upcoming Torah portion. When congregants show up Saturday morning for Torah study, they are prepared.

Other Reform congregations use Web cameras to broadcast their Shabbat and High Holidays services live for those unable to attend in person, such as the homebound elderly and students away at college.

The URJ offers a wide spectrum of online advice, including live tech support for member congregations embarking on these adventures. They will need it.

What really happened at the Reform biennial in Toronto Read More »

French FM: Israel’s desire for peace has ‘vanished’

Israel’s desire for peace seems to have “completely vanished,” France’s foreign minister said.

“What really hurts me, and this shocks us, is that before there used to be a great peace movement in Israel.,” Bernard Kouchner told France Inter radio Tuesday. “There was a left that made itself heard and a real desire for peace.

“It seems to me, and I hope that I am completely wrong, that this desire has completely vanished, as though people no longer believe in it.”

Kouchner made his statements ahead of a scheduled meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and French President Nicolas Sarkozy set for Wednesday. The meeting comes immediately after a sit-down between Netanyahu and President Obama in Washington on Monday, at which no major breakthroughs were announced.

Kouchner also said a there was “a real difference of political opinion,” between French President Sarkozy and Netanyahu, concerning whether or not to freeze settlement activity.

“We still think that the settlement freeze, that is to say, no settling during (peace) talks, is absolutely essential,” said Kouchner.

France has continued to demand that Israel halt all construction in the West Bank, which the Palestinians say is a precondition to restarting peace talks. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton recently called Israel’s restraint in settlement construction “unprecedented.”

Kouchner also said Tuesday that he would visit the Middle East “in the coming days” and encourage Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to run for re-election in January. Abbas has said he will not run.

French FM: Israel’s desire for peace has ‘vanished’ Read More »

White House pushes negotiations without preconditions

Rahm Emanuel urged Palestinians and Israelis to launch negotiations without preconditions, echoing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s call.

“All issues should be resolved through negotiations,” said the White House chief of staff, speaking here Tuesday at the Jewish Federations of North America’s General Assembly. “Unilateral actions should be avoided and cannot dictate the outcome.”

Emanuel called this “a time of peril but also of opportunity.”

Netanyahu has called for negotiations without preconditions, but Palestinian leaders say they will not negotiate without a full Israeli settlement freeze.

Emanuel spoke Tuesday in place of President Obama, who canceled his planned GA appearance to attend a memorial service for the victims of the shooting at Fort Hood, Texas.

On Monday, Netanyhau in his GA address called for the immediate resumption of peace talks with the Palestinians.

“Let us seize the moment to reach an historic agreement; let us begin talks immediately,” Netanyahu said, appealing to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

Netanyahu chided the Palestinians for turning aside what he and the Obama administration have suggested is an “unprecedented” offer to freeze some settlement construction while allowing for “natural growth” and building in Jerusalem.

“No Israeli government has been so willing to restrain settlement activity,” he said.

Netanyahu did not mention earlier Israeli preconditions, including leaving off the table for now Jerusalem and refugee issues, and a refusal to deal with Hamas, the terrorist group in control in the Gaza Strip.

He also lavished praise on Obama, who sustains strong support among American Jews but is unpopular in Israel. The Israeli prime minister thanked Obama for opposing efforts in the United Nations to advance the Goldstone report, which accuses Israel of war crimes during last winter’s Gaza war, for sustaining the U.S.-Israel security relationship, and for leading international efforts to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

Obama and Netanyahu met behind closed doors in the White House on Monday evening. Emanuel said Tuesday that the meeting was “very positive” and that he was “absolutely confident that Prime Minister Netanyahu understands completely the strategic importance of moving this peace process forward.”

Emanuel defended the administration from those who he said have portrayed attempts to open dialogue with the Arab world as showing a diminished level of support for Israel, or come at Israel’s expense.

“That is not the intent and that is not the case and never will be,” Emanuel said. “It is only through dialogue that we can achieve the lasting peace Israel seeks.”

He also denied that the administration had singled out Israel for criticism on settlements, saying that the administration’s position was consistent with those of previous administrations on the issue, as well as with the “road map” peace plan.

“No one should allow the issue of settlements to distract from the overarching goal of lasting peace,” Emanuel said.

In addition to noting that his son and nephew would be celebrating their bar mitzvahs in Israel this spring, Emanuel also spoke of his family’s roots in Israel and the “privileged point of view” he has had seeing Israel’s “values as a homeland.”

The chief of staff also touched on domestic issues, saying that last weekend’s vote by the House of Representatives on health care legislation brought the United States “closer than ever to achieving” health care reform. He said the domestic priorities of Obama match with the Jewish Federations of North America’s priorities—“don’t leave our neighbors behind and work for fairness and justice for all.”

Emanuel’s speech came a day after leaders of the Jewish Federations met with Obama and other top administration officials at the White House.

Monday afternoon’s hourlong reception, scheduled after Obama had to cancel his Tuesday speech to the GA, featured short remarks from Obama. Mostly, though, attendees had a chance to talk one on one with the president and White House senior staff.

Obama, who dropped by for about 30 minutes, said that the Jewish Federations of North America “perform every day of every week selfless acts of tzedakah,” according to a person present at the meeting, and spoke about his experience with Chicago’s Jewish federation. He also made a pitch for health-care reform, talking about the importance of passing it and stating that he could “see the light at the end of the tunnel.” He also said he looked forward to his meeting with Netanyahu that evening.

White House staff at the meeting included Emanuel; top advisers David Axelrod and Valerie Jarrett; Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag; National Security Council staffer Dan Shapiro; Office of White House Public Engagement director Tina Tchen; and White House Jewish outreach officials Susan Scher, who is also chief of staff to Michelle Obama and Danielle Borrin.

“We were thankful to have an opportunity to directly discuss a number of our concerns with the administration’s senior team and look forward to continuing to reach out to them in the future to ensure the voice of the Jewish community is heard loud and far in Washington,” Jerry Silverman, president and CEO of the Jewish Federations, said in a statement.

White House pushes negotiations without preconditions Read More »

Ari Teman wins Jewish Community Hero award

After weeks of deliberation and more than 600,000 votes, the Jewish Federations of North America has named its first Jewish Community Hero: Ari Teman.

Teman, 27, is the founder of JCorps, an organization that sets up young Jews with volunteer opportunities in nine cities over three continents—while working on virtually no budget.

A panel of judges from outside the federation system chose Teman for the Jewish Federations’ $25,000 Jewish Community Heroes prize after more than 600,000 online votes were cast to whittle down a list of more than 400 nominees.

The Jewish Federations made the announcement at the closing plenary session of its General Assembly conference in Washingon.

The contest was part of the federation system’s new multimillion dollar marketing and re-branding strategy to broaden its base of support.

Teman, a standup comedian by day, runs JCorps as strictly a volunteer on a budget that is probably less than the award he will take home. Yet the organization has enlisted some 10,000 volunteers for local community service projects in the United States, Canada and Israel.

“This will enable us to take in a lot more volunteers rapidly without having to worry, ‘Do we have to slow it down because we can’t afford to bring more people in?’ ” Teman told JTA.

Teman said he started the organization in 2007 on something of a late-night whim about how he could meet more Jewish people.

The prize money will help the program expand and perhaps allow Teman to hire his first professional staff member.

“The first year we started with $300,” he said. “We like to say that if we had no money we could still keep running, which is great, because it means the money we put in is for growth.”

Ari Teman wins Jewish Community Hero award Read More »

Bibi Then and Now

Bibi’s speech (Nov. 9, 2009)



Read coverage of Bibi’s 2006 GA address here.

If you heard Benjamin Netanyahu speak at the General Assembly in Los Angeles three years ago, you would have thought, except for the perfect diction, it was a different man.

Netanyahu appeared on Nov. 9, 2006, before some 5,000 delegates at the Los Angeles Convention Center and thundered, “It’s 1938—and Iran is Germany.”

This week—on Nov. 9, actually—I heard Netanyahu speak in Washington, D.C. again at the annual convention of the Jewish Federations of North America. What a difference three years makes.

In 2006, Netanyahu was the Knesset opposition leader, now he’s Israel’s Prime Minister. From the opposition you can launch grenades—you have to. As the “Prime Minister of Israel and leader of the Jewish people”—as his friend Leonid Nevzlin introduced him—you have to pull it back a little.

You do get the world’s best security. Two sentences into Netanyahu’s address a heckler yelled out “Gaza!” and was instantly rushed out by an offensive line that would have cowed the Redskins. I almost felt sorry for the guy, since to eke out that single word he’d had to wait through an hour of introductory speeches and presentations (“The Sapir Award for Excellence to the Federation of Augusta Georgia for reaching $312,000,” etc.).

Had the heckler hung around, he would have heard a Netanyahu who sounded like Al Gore at a Peace Now rally.

The Prime Minister who three years ago bellowed, “When someone tells you he is going to exterminate you, believe him and stop him!” began this year’s talk by stressing the need for peace with the Palestinians.

“We need peace to spare our children and grandchildren the horrors of war,” he said. “My goal is to achieve a permanent peace treaty between Israel and the Palestinians. No matter where our final borders are drawn, Israel will remain secure. Let us seize the moment and begin talks immediately.”

He pledged that he would never negotiate away the right of return, either to the Palestinians or the Orthodox rabbinate.

“Any Jew—of any denomination—will always have a right to come home to the Jewish state,” he said. “Religious pluralism and tolerance will always guide my policy.”

Then Netanyahu promised that Israel would lead the world in developing alternatives to fossil fuels that support hostile regimes and harm the environment. He pledged a national commission “to dramatically reduce our dependence on oil over the next decade,” drawing on Israel’s advances in solar and cutting-edge energy sources.

Iran, the focus of his tirade three years ago, received maybe three muted mentions, when Netanyahu thanked President Barack Obama and cooperative European nations for united resolutions demanding Iran forego the development of nuclear weapons. If you blinked you would have missed them.

Who is this Netanyahu? If three years ago was 1938, isn’t today 1941? Aren’t we, the Jews, in even greater danger? Hasn’t the Holocaust begun?

“Things look different from up here than they did from down there,” Ariel Sharon famously said once he assumed the prime ministership.

A leader’s job is to inspire, to motivate. Fear only gets you so far.

Maybe Netanyahu was being duplicitous—there were plenty in the audience, especially those who support him, who said he couldn’t be less interested in making peace with the Palestinians. Even if it were politically possible, even if he weren’t ideologically opposed to it, even if the Palestinian had their act together, even if Obama hadn’t fumfered his initial attempts at peace-brokering, Netanyahu doesn’t see the urgency, they say.

Maybe. And perhaps he knows green energy and religious pluralism are a hora to American Jewish ears. It wouldn’t surprise me if Michael Oren, the American-born scholar and author who is now Israel’s Ambassador’s to the United States, took his pencil to a draft. Oren is a superb writer with a keen sense of American Jewry.

But there is also this: It’s possible he’s calculating, and it’s also possible he’s conflicted. Netanyahu, like most Israelis, like the Jewish people, is torn.

We know how bad our oil dependency is, but we won’t give up our Mercedes and SUVs.

We know how desperate the charitable needs are in the Jewish and non-Jewish worlds, but we won’t give a penny more than we planned.

We’ve known for 40 years the inevitable endgame of occupation—at some point, there are going to be more of them than us… and then what? But we pretended it wouldn’t apply to a moral, noble, Jewish state.

We believe in pluralism, in “Peoplehood”—that was the buzzword of the whole convention—but we are loathe to relinquish our turf.

Yes, if there are two faces to Netanyahu, there are two faces to the Jewish community as well. We are all like that—now and then.

 

Bibi Then and Now Read More »

AJU’s Noah’s ark story, starring Jason Alexander, a pleasant surprise

On November 1, I saw “Two by Two” at the American Jewish University, a staging of the Noah’s Ark story, starring Jason Alexander as Noah. Okay, to be honest, even though I’m like a huge “Seinfeld” fan and think Jason Alexander is a lot more versatile than people give him credit for being, I wasn’t expecting much. We’re talking about the Noah’s Ark story here.

But this was a pretty different version of the Noah story I was familiar with anyway. The story I know, even though it’s in the Torah and everything, straight out of Genesis, is actually pretty simple: God decides man is evil and says He will flood the Earth to start over.  But Noah’s a pretty good person, so God tells Noah he will spare him, instructs him to build an ark, to bring his family on-board, as well as two of every non-human creature. Noah does, and, sure enough, the flood comes. Noah and his family are safe on the ark. Afterwards, God makes a covenant with Noah that He will never destroy the Earth again. And that’s about it. Yes there are a few others things that happen in- between, like a dove going on a mission to find some land, but that is basically the gist. Unless you’re like the Rambam or Rashi and are able to extrapolate really deep insights and write crazy-long commentary from not a whole lot, the Noah’s Ark story is no “Infinite Jest.” In fact, I remember being told at one point during my Jewish upbringing that the Noah story is more a less a Midrash for why we have rainbows.

So, complicated it is not.

BUT the version that Richard Rodgers wrote the music for, a 1970 Broadway production that the Reprise Theater Company recently adapted into a smart, humorous and thought-provoking staged-reading/musical hybrid as part of their month-long celebration of Rodgers—who is most famous for “The Sound of Music, something he did as a collaboration with Oscar Hammerstein—the new version, which incorporates some contemporary flourishes and has the characters speaking like we do despite being hundreds of years old and living in Biblical times, this version really goes for it, raising really significant questions about blind faith and all the while depicting a family that is just as dysfunctional as, well, your own. Noah is a kook and a bit of a drunk and he has a hard time bonding with his grown-up sons, who have their own relationship problems and don’t even believe Noah when he tells them that he talked to God and that God said a flood is coming. Throughout the play, Noah and his children clash and Noah’s wife has to play the role of peacekeeper. Her character is actually a role model for real-life married moms today who don’t know how to be a good wife and mother at the same time.

The tragedy is that “Two by Two” was only scheduled for a two-night run and most people will never have a chance to see it. I have no inclination as to why Reprise decided to do it this way. Perhaps they figured there wasn’t much of an audience for the staging of a Noah’s Ark story that doesn’t even have an actual ark in it. I mean, like I said, I wasn’t all that amped on seeing it.

But it was good—like, really good—and, I don’t know, I think that whoever is reading this should start a petition or something and demand additional shows. Or don’t, I don’t care. I already got to see it.

AJU’s Noah’s ark story, starring Jason Alexander, a pleasant surprise Read More »