fbpx

August 3, 2009

Gunman: Your Black Muslim Bakery leader said kill reporter and ‘we’ll have a laugh’

Devaughndre Broussard has admitted to killing Chauncey Bailey, an Oakland journalist who was digging deep into Your Black Muslim Bakery. (More at ChaunceyBaileyProject.org) His testimony in the spring led to the indictment of others involved with the bakery, including onetime leader Yusuf Bey IV, 23.

Broussard’s testimony was released last week. Here’s an excerpt from the San Francisco Chronicle:

He told the grand jury that Bey IV was angry at Bailey for having somehow contributed to the death of his father, bakery founder Yusuf Bey Sr., in 2003. Bey IV also wanted to stop Bailey from writing about the bakery’s financial collapse. “You got to take Chauncey Bailey out before he write that article,” Broussard testified that Bey had told him.

The night before the killing, Bey IV said: “When you get this done, we are going to have a laugh,” and added later, “This is going to be big.”

Broussard said that the next day, he and Mackey were supposed to have handheld radios, but they didn’t charge properly, so they could not be used to help orchestrate the attack. Instead, they used cell phones and the attack went off well, with him firing enough shots to make sure Bailey was dead, Broussard told the grand jury.

Broussard said he later met with Bey IV and told him it was a “done deal.” The bakery leader was grateful, he said. “He gave me a hug. He gave Mackey a hug. He go, ‘I love y’all.’ That’s what he said.”

Bey IV then got in a car, Broussard recounted, saying: “What do y’all want to do? I’m hungry. We going to IHOP.”

Read the rest here.

Gunman: Your Black Muslim Bakery leader said kill reporter and ‘we’ll have a laugh’ Read More »

Israeli Police recommend Lieberman indictment

The Israeli Police’s National Fraud Unit recommended that the state prosecutor indict Avigdor Lieberman in a money-laundering scheme.

In a brief turned over Sunday to the Attorney General’s office, the police recommended that the foreign minister be indicted on charges of bribery, fraud, money laundering, witness harassment and obstruction of justice, Ha’aretz reported.

The investigation has been ongoing for several years, but picked up steam after Lieberman’s Yisrael Beiteinu became the third largest political party in the country in last February’s elections. Lieberman petitioned the Supreme Court to speed up the investigation after he became foreign minister.

“For 13 years the police have conducted a campaign of persecution against me,” Lieberman said in a statement released Sunday. “As much as my political strength and the strength of Yisrael Beiteinu rise, the campaign of persecution also intensifies.”

He is under investigation for establishing shell companies that allegedly funneled millions of shekels to him, continuing after Lieberman took public office. He also is accused of trying to obstruct police investigations.

Lieberman also served as a salaried employee in a company owned by his daughter, Michal, which during his three-year employment received millions of dollars from anonymous sources overseas for consulting, according to Ha’aretz/.

Israeli Police recommend Lieberman indictment Read More »

New Coen Brothers movie trailer: ‘The rabbi is busy!’

The Coen Brothers have explored dark, strange territory in their films before, but never in such an overtly Jewish context. Their newest film, “A Serious Man” is a deeper prod into their heritage, a closer look at the community and customs that made for good jokes in The Big Lebowski. In ‘Serious,’ a scorned Jewish man falls pray to complete family dysfunction and a hostile professional sabotage that threatens to derail his carefully measured life. Naturally, the protagonist seeks the advice of wise sages—the rabbis—who (at least by the looks of the trailer) aren’t altogether interested in his problems.

Patrick Goldstein from the L.A. Times gives the trailer two thumbs up. “What the trailer offers us is an unsettling, yet somehow irresistibly mesmerizing tone—something is amiss here, something that will unfold in a surprising, yet disturbing Coen brothers fashion.” Goldstein says he’s psyched “to be first in line” when the film is released in theaters in October.

Here’s the summary from imdb.com:

Larry Gopnik, a physics professor at a quiet midwestern university, has just been informed by his wife Judith that she is leaving him. She has fallen in love with one of his more pompous colleagues, Sy Ableman, who seems to her a more substantial person than the feckless Larry. Larry’s unemployable brother Arthur is sleeping on the couch, his son Danny is a discipline problem and a shirker at Hebrew school, and his daughter Sarah is filching money from his wallet in order to save up for a nose job. While his wife and Sy Ableman blithely make new domestic arrangements, and his brother becomes more and more of a burden, an anonymous hostile letter-writer is trying to sabotage Larry’s chances for tenure at the university. Also, a graduate student seems to be trying to bribe him for a passing grade while at the same time threatening to sue him for defamation. Plus, the beautiful woman next door torments him by sunbathing nude. Struggling for equilibrium, Larry seeks advice from three different rabbis. Can anyone help him cope with his afflictions and become a righteous person; a mensch, a serious man?

Check it out:

New Coen Brothers movie trailer: ‘The rabbi is busy!’ Read More »

Now Let’s Take a Critical Look at Ourselves, by Rabbi Asher Lopatin

Friends,

A few weeks ago I started outlining what I see as five pillars of contemporary Orthodox Judaism.  I am not trying to displace the Maimonidian 13 principles of faith, nor the four principles of Rav Yosef Albo.  I’m just trying to point out what I think are the key ingredients in being an Orthodox Jew today – and in maintaining our way of life for the future.  The past few weeks have been particularly difficult, at least in the media, for our Chareidi brothers and sisters, and I have certainly done my share to point out the challenges I believe they face in working to sanctify God’s name.  However, we Morethodox Jews have to look inwards as well, and I think the third pillar of Orthodoxy might serve also as a critique of Modern Orthodox Jews – at least in the way we normally see ourselves.  The other two principles, Torah from Sinai and Innovation (Chiddush) from Sinai, are great rallying cries for Modern Orthodoxy.  But now #3:

Intellectual and halachic rigor and discipline:  When we closely observe our detailed laws of Kashrut, of davening, coming to minyan and making sure there is a minyan in our communities,  of kavana (concentration, focus) in our davening , of the Shabbat, as it is expressed in its myriad of rituals and ethical aspects, of family purity in its own ritual and social aspects, the laws of gossiping and loving our fellow Jews and respecting our fellow human beings, then we become the vessels through which Torah can be interpreted and even rethought.  The Netziv puts it in terms of the two words: “Lishmor ve’la’asot” – from Parshat Va’etchanan: We need to first be the preservers of the Torah and practice we inherit from the previous generation, then we can move on to relooking at everything with fresh, innovative eyes, and understand Torah for our generation.  When we are preservers of Torah and Torah practice, then we become safe space for God’s infinite word – we become the rightful heirs of the tradition which we are obliged to re-examine for ourselves.  Only through this rigor and commitment to Halacha, minhag (custom) and tradition can our lives reflect the living Torah which God gave us at Sinai.

Do we as Modern Orthodox Jews have this religious rigor in our lives? Do we have the passion?  I think we see it in the Chareidi and Yeshivish world, but we need to see it in our world.  MOREthodox – we have to be the one that are not only innovative, creative and responsive to our generation’s needs, we also have to be the ones that people can look to for all the strength that has come down to us from Moshe and Sinai. 

I know that is an area that I work on, and perhaps in Israel our Modern Orthodox brothers and sisters do it better.  But we have to make sure that Modern Orthodoxy is not lazy Orthodoxy. If it is, we will lose our right to be the innovators of Torah and we will lose our right to redefine what a Torah Jew is in 2009.

Let’s go to work!

Asher Lopatin

Now Let’s Take a Critical Look at Ourselves, by Rabbi Asher Lopatin Read More »

Roseanne plays Hitler for Heeb magazine

Not too many people are laughing at Roseanne Barr’s portrayal of Hitler on the cover of Heeb magazine this month. Yet there she is: a real-life Jewish grandmother dressed as a “Nazi domestic goddess.” She even figured in the trademark Hitler mustache and swastika armband, and bakes a batch of “burnt Jew cookies,” you know, for emphasis. Extra TV did a segment on the cover last week calling it “not funny” and shaming the controversial choice. But Heeb publisher Josh Neuman defended it, saying the cover was meant as “satire” and not done for “shock value.”

OK, you mean to tell me putting a Jewish woman on the cover of a Jewish magazine costumed as the man who burnt Jews in ovens (while she burns things in ovens) has no shock value? Since we’re being a wee bit insensitive to the remaining Holocaust survivors and their children, let’s at least call a spade a spade here, folks.

But if you’re mad, don’t blame Heeb. It was Roseanne who wanted to be photographed as Hitler. According to the magazine, she has a theory “that she may in fact be the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler,” and thus requested to create a kind of Jewish Halloween nightmare in order to make a personal statement. Writer Oliver Noble accompanied Roseanne at the photo shoot and wrote about the strange atmosphere on set:

“When you meet her, it’s best if you don’t try to shake her hand,” Roseanne Barr’s makeup artist and longtime friend warns me. “She doesn’t like to be touched by strangers.” OK, no sweaty handshakes. Fair enough. But there’s more. “If you get nervous around Roseanne, try not to show it. She’s like a shark. If she smells fear, she’ll tear you apart,” the makeup artist says.

Noble wisely decided to go with the flow. He writes that he greeted Roseanne with a “Sieg Heil,” in honor of the shoot.

As the “Domestic Goddess” dons the famous moustache, transforming into “Domestic Goddess Hitler,” I notice that she’s beginning to have fun. She nails the Fuehrer’s facial expressions with twisted glee, and as she takes the burnt gingerbread “Jew Cookies” out of the oven it occurs to me that Barr may be the last celebrity utterly incapable of giving a fuck.

“Until it’s time to face the practical repercussions,” Noble writes.

On her blog, Roseanne had to defend her choice and wrote that she was mocking Hitler and ridiculing his ideas.

Hitler thought he was being really manly “cleaning Germany up” by burning people in ovens. I was making fun of him, not his victims. My caricature of him very aptly imitates the “man with a godly mission” pose that he struck in all the early photographs taken of him. I portray him being very proud of his burnt cookies, because in his last words, he was proudly congratulating himself for killing so many Jews, and encouraged the German people to carry on his mission against the “International Jew.” The guy actually thought that killing jews was a good thing! The language that he used is still being used by many world leaders to this day. He killed my whole family, it is true, but he is also dead, and I, a Jewish woman, am still alive to make fun of him, and I will continue to make fun of the little runt for the rest of my life! He, and his ideas need to be laughed at even more these days, picked apart and analyzed up and down, as there are more and more people denying his crimes, and more and more despots trying to copy them.

But from the public’s reaction, it seems the larger culture isn’t ready for such a blatant Holocaust joke. It hasn’t inspired conversations about satirical irony, as Heeb had hoped, as much as it has elicited shock and awe from those who were unprepared for such an image. Which is a problem for smart comedians like Roseanne. It’s the same criticism that was made of Sasha Baron Cohen for his latest film, “Bruno” in which overt embodiment of gay stereotypes was meant as a critique of homophobia, not of homosexuals. Before the film was released, New York Times writer Brooks Barnes wrote, “Ultimately the tension surrounding “Brüno” boils down to the worry that certain viewers won’t understand that the joke is on them and will leave the multiplex with their homophobia validated.” The same could be said of Roseanne’s Heeb cover: anti-Semites won’t get the joke and will continue to endorse Hitler’s agenda.

Neuman thinks it’s time American culture owns up to its own interests. On Heeb’s blog, he writes that a rise in mainstream humor about the Holocaust may be signaling a cultural shift in attitude.

“Virtually every pitch we received leading up to the publishing of our Germany Issue circled back to the Nazis and the Holocaust and almost all of them were humorous,” he writes. “Certainly Jews have been joking about the Holocaust since the Holocaust (I believe it was the Warsaw Ghetto where the Jewish inhabitants referred to Hitler regularly as “Horowitz”), but these jokes have largely been uttered in private or underground. In recent years, they have been finding themselves in the most public of conversations.”

He cites some examples:

Seinfeld’s “Soup Nazi” is as much a part of American culture (and Jewish culture, specifically) as Fiddler on the Roof, and Curb Your Enthusiasm’s “Survivor” episode is about as controversial as a Christmas Day screening of Annie Hall. And the trend seems to only gather momentum. Just this month, Brüno (at one point, America’s number one box office draw) introduced the concept of “bleaching one’s Auschwitz” and the climax of The Hangover (which has now grossed over $247 million) revolved around a stripper (played by Heather Graham) returning the ring of the grandmother of one of the leads (played by Ed Helms). “I didn’t know that they gave out rings in the Holocaust,” jokes the character played by Zach Galifianakis.

“And what better way to capture this moment in popular culture than by having the original ‘domestic goddess’ don the Fuhrer’s famous mustache?” Neuman asks.

In the magazine’s defense he says “Heeb is a satirical Jewish culture magazine that interrogates stereotypes and ideas that many hold sacred in order to represent the complex and nuanced perspectives that many Jews have about their identities.” Indeed, in comedy as in satire, nothing is sacred. But pop culture jokes about the Holocaust have been getting public play long before the Soup Nazi entered the kitchen and certainly before Heeb decided to put one on the cover.

Mel Brooks has been playing and mocking Hitler for decades (anyone see a little play called “The Producers”?) and has said on television that, “One of my lifelong jobs has been to make the world laugh at Adolf Hitler, because how do you get even? There’s only one way to get even: you have to bring him down with ridicule.”

Roseanne would probably agree.

Roseanne plays Hitler for Heeb magazine Read More »

The star of ‘Blossom’ reflects on how belief changed her look

Earlier this year, producers from the TLC makeover show “What Not to Wear” chose me to “fix.” It was eight months after I had given birth to my second son (my first was 3 years old), and I had just completed a doctorate in neuroscience.

I had been wearing slouchy clothes since long before I had kids. I favored men’s oversized garments that hung loosely from my body and had never much cared for fashion or trends. For the most part, I spent little to no time on my appearance.

From the time I was 19 until I turned 32, I devoted my time to studying, writing a thesis and starting a family. But the acting itch never completely abated and I had decided to pursue it again rather than stay in academia. The actor’s life I want to pursue gives me more time to raise my children rather than hand them over to a nanny. Having a makeover seemed like a great opportunity to put together a new look that I could use on future auditions.

The WNTW producers asked if I had any clothing restrictions. Deep breath.

“I don’t wear pants,” I told them. “I prefer skirts.”

You see, I am what I guess you’d call a Conservadox Jew. I started embracing certain aspects of Jewish modesty, or tzniut, before my second son was born, and although I know many Orthodox women who don’t observe tzniut, the boundaries and framework of privacy it provides appealed to me.

I was raised in a traditional Reform household, the granddaughter of poor Orthodox immigrants from Eastern Europe. For them, success in America came at the seemingly small price of relative assimilation.

Growing up, I lived a pretty normal life. I had my own prime-time network TV show from the ages of 14 to 19, which meant my physical appearance and clothing choices were dissected on a weekly basis in gossip magazines and on television.

I was pretty impervious to media critiques of my style. I had no real sense of my own physicality and took for granted the feminist idea that I should be able to walk around naked without harassment. But I soon learned that not everyone was a feminist.

After graduating from public high school in Los Angeles, I went to college at UCLA, where I met the man who is now my husband. Knowing we wanted a traditional wedding ceremony, we started studying Judaism together to prepare for it.

At first my lessons with an Orthodox instructor were almost anthropological – I was curious as to how Judaism viewed marriage and sexuality, but I did not really intend to increase my level of observance.  The more I learned, however, the more my previous distance from traditional Judaism disappeared.

I was also a serious person in general, and chose a wedding dress that reflected my serious attitude about marriage. Entering a sacred covenant before God, I wore an ankle-length, high-necked Victorian dress with sleeves past the elbow and a heavy veil, reminiscent (I hoped) of the matriarchs Leah and Rebekah.

During the days of the sheva brachot, the seven traditional feasts celebrated in the days after the chupah ceremony, I tentatively covered my head with scarves and crocheted hats, trying on my new status as a married woman. Beyond wearing a ring, my lifestyle didn’t have a means of representing the change from single to married, and I was cautious about challenging the feminist ideals I had previously embraced. But I liked feeling a physical representation in my new life as a married woman. In synagogue, I began covering my head with tichels (decorative scarves) from trips to Israel – just as my Orthodox cousins who I used to consider submissive and trapped in an archaic lifestyle taught me to wrap them – and fashionable hats. No flowers allowed. Too Blossom-y.

As my life progressed, tzniut became a bigger part and I started appreciating what it means to keep your sexual appeal for yourself and your partner. I came to see that not everything that makes me beautiful, sexy or desirable needs to be on display.

In the world of acting, though, maintaining a degree of modesty has been a challenge. I stopped wearing pants outside of the home in November 2007. (I still wear them at home or under dresses.) These days, I am more comfortable in skirts rather than the baggy, saggy pants I used to wear. I feel more attractive and more put-together in a skirt.

Tzniut doesn’t mean making yourself less attractive; it means highlighting your strengths within limits.

But my definition of limits and that of the folks at “What Not to Wear” differed. On and off the set, I discussed my skirt preference with the producers. When the hosts showed me pants as a possible option in my wardrobe, I pointed out that I don’t much wear them. I didn’t claim to be the spokesperson for tzniut; after all, I still wear shirts above the elbows and don’t cover my head regularly.

I bought wonderful new clothes, jewelry and vegan shoes (one of my other preferences). When we filmed me revealing the final outfits they picked, I gently pointed out that skirts above the knee are not something I would wear, and that I wouldn’t wear sleeveless shirts or dresses without something to cover my arms once I left the set. When the show aired, I saw that my qualifications and explanations did not survive the cutting room.

I don’t wish to claim that there is an “immodest agenda” on WNTW. It’s a show for the average American, who is most likely not Jewish, and if she is Jewish, she’s most likely not observant.

In spite of the fact that the hosts kept telling me that I needed to be “sexy” and not “hide” in my clothing, I loved being a part of the show. They were right to encourage me to wear clothing that was my size and to emphasize my figure where it needed emphasizing. But sexy doesn’t necessarily mean scantily clad.

The week after WNTW was filmed, I auditioned to play a Chasidic woman on “Saving Grace.” When the call came in I laughed, pulled a salvaged Israeli ankle-length dark denim skirt from the floor of my almost bare closet, threw on a WNTW-purchased tank, cardigan and simple flats, and applied some lovely understated make-up. I booked the part.

(Mayim Bialik starred on NBC’s “Blossom” from 1990 to 1994. More recently she has appeared on “Curb Your Enthusiasm” and “Saving Grace” and this fall will have a recurring role on “The Secret Life of the American Teenager.” Reprinted from Tabletmag.com, a new read on Jewish life.)

The star of ‘Blossom’ reflects on how belief changed her look Read More »

When Rabbis Fail their Communities

It’s become pretty rough being a Rabbi in New Jersey where your friends call you up to ask not what you’re planning to talk about in your Saturday sermon but whether you have a phone in your cell.

OK, poor attempt at humor. But this is honestly one of the hardest columns I’ve ever written. How do you address the painful images of Rabbis on the perp walk, accused of money laundering and organ trafficking? How do you respond to charges of religious hypocrisy and the large number of unaffiliated Jews who use these outrages as justification for rejection of Jewish observance?

I guess you do so humbly, mindful of President Obama’s own recent misstep in wading into legal matters without full knowledge of the facts, but agreeing that such difficult circumstances also provide teachable moments.

Here are the lessons that I have culled.

1.    Rabbis are human, fallible, and are comprised of the usual mixture of good and bad as are lesser mortals. Judaism has no Jesus figure who is above struggling with what Abraham Lincoln called ‘the better angels of our nature’ and one’s inner demons. Rather than any of this serving as an argument against the need for religion, the very opposite is true. Because men and women gravitate to greed and are prone to corruption, we require a framework of law and the sprinklings of holiness in order that we be inspired to live righteously.

2.    Our community is in need of a moral and spiritual renaissance. We are good, law-abiding, generous people. But money is becoming too important to us. We all want to afford nice things and live comfortably in upscale communities. But while such wishes are legitimate, they must forever bend to the desire to live humbly, serve as moral exemplars to our children, and practice charity with disadvantaged neighbors. We require a renewed eloquence in the articulation of Judaism’s most important values and an even firmer affirmation to live by its tenets.

3.    There are two kinds of sins of which we Rabbis can be guilty, commission and omission. Commission involves serious allegations of criminal wrongdoing. But omission is even more grave and involves a failure to inspire the community to choose the Wailing Wall over Wall Street and spiritual growth over material acquisition. In this sense, none of us Rabbis are innocent.

4.    Amid these serious allegations, the accused Rabbis should be judged charitably. They were not Bernie Madoff who stole money to buy a penthouse and a yacht. Several are men with long histories of sacrifice and selflessness on behalf of their communities. Running a Yeshiva, Synagogue or school, with its incessant demands for funding, can be soul-destroying. You feel like a beggar as you run from one donor to the next. The never-ending demands to meet payroll, pay utilities, and offer communal programs free of charge makes you age before your time. A friend of mine who runs a successful Jewish day school quoted to me the words of Rivkah in the Bible, “I have come to loathe my very life.” Not that this could ever justify doing anything that unethical, immoral, let alone illegal. It does serve, however, as a sober reminder that many of the accused Rabbis were looking to fund communal institutions but were tragically compromised in the process. Some will say they deserve our contempt. I will respond that they also deserve our compassion and our pity.

5.    The exception to this rule is the man accused of trafficking in human organs,  actions that are abominable and abhorrent to every particle of a religion whose highest principle is the absolute primary of human life.

6.    Those who wish to justify their jettisoning of faith based on these and similar scandals ought to bear in mind that there is a difference between hypocrisy and inconsistency. The former involves proclaiming, for public consumption, a belief that one inwardly repudiates. The latter involves believing something but not always summoning the moral courage to live by one’s convictions.

7.    My dear friend Mark Charendoff, an exemplary leader who heads the Jewish Funders Network, wrote of the Rabbis, “There is a special place in hell reserved for these individuals. Not only did they play the part of pious clergy while pursuing their criminal paths but they made religious and charitable institutions into (one hopes unwitting) accomplices.” But hell, a place of eternal damnation, which we Jews don’t believe in anyway, is reserved for people like Hitler and Osama bin Laden, in other words, people with no good in them whatsoever. But these Rabbis, who chose community work over more lucrative professions, ought to have the good they performed applauded even as the transgressions they are accused of are condemned.

8.    Before we give up hope on Rabbis or the Jewish community, let’s keep in mind that many questions remain that have yet to be answered. How many Rabbis were approached who turned down the FBI informant? How many times did those who eventually acceded reject the informant’s persistent overtures until they succumbed? And as far as the Syrian community is concerned, few Jewish communities are as renowned for their generosity, philanthropy, and devotion to the needy.
I have spent my life trying to bring Jewish values to the mainstream public. I know how much damage is done to that cause when Rabbis are led away in handcuffs. Indeed, when I contemplate my own, albeit lesser, imperfections as a man – my appreciation for recognition and my, at times, selfish behavior – I question whether I always do justice to the title of Rabbi myself. But while we Jews dare never excuse our corruption, we likewise dare never become so cynical as to forget that those who seek to become Rabbis and communal activists do so while watching their friends embrace careers where they will probably not face the same financial pressures.

The vast majority of those who work in the community are heroes. Imperfect. Flawed. Inadequate. But heroes nonetheless.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach’s upcoming book ‘The Blessing of Enough: Rejecting Material Greed, Embracing Spiritual Hunger,’ will be published on September 8th. He is the founder of This World: The Values Network. www.shmuley.com.

When Rabbis Fail their Communities Read More »

Emma Forrest makes Variety’s ’10 to Watch’

I gotta give a shout out to my gal Emma Forrest who turned a broken heart into sweet, sweet Hollywood revenge. Boyfriends beware! Her triumph came in the form of a screenplay, “Liars (A-E),” penned in just three days following a bad breakup with actor Colin Farrell (well at least that’s the rumor), which she promptly sold to producer Scott Rudin.

Last week, Variety profiled her in their “10 to Watch” feature, which highlights up-and-coming screenwriters. Well, duh. We’ve been following Emma for a long time and so if I were to say, ‘We saw it comin’!’ you’d have to believe me. 

More from the Variety profileby Adam Dawtrey:

Don’t date Emma Forrest if you’re afraid to see yourself immortalized in her next script.

“I’m from the Nora Ephron school,” she confesses. “Everything is copy. Every guy I get involved with for five minutes knows I’m going to write about him.”

She wrote “Liars (A-E)” this spring in just three days following the breakup of her yearlong relationship with actor Colin Farrell. A couple of weeks later, the script was sold to Scott Rudin and Miramax. Richard Linklater is attached to direct, and shooting is slated for fall.

“It came like a fever dream. I was afraid to stop writing because I was so afraid to lose it,” she recounts.

Forrest has always been quick off the mark. Born and raised in London with an American mother (TV writer Judy Raines) and a British father, she landed a column for the London Times when she was only 15.

“It was supposed to be about my generation, but the problem is that I live with a melancholy for things I never experienced, so I would write about Leonard Cohen and pretend that’s what my friends were talking about,” she says.

She wrote her first novel, “Namedropper,” at the age of 18 and has since published three more.

She moved to New York at 20, and for the past couple of years she’s been living in Los Angeles. But her projects are getting made on both sides of the Pond.

Among them, “Know Your Rights,” inspired by another breakup, is in the works at Film4. And “Love Minus Zero,” an adaptation of Nikita Lalwani’s novel “Gifted,” is in development at BBC Films.

Emma writes on her blog that she was slightly misquoted. What she really said was:

“If I talk to you for more than five minutes, I’m probably going to write about you” – an interpolation of a Taylor Swift quote (viva Nashville!) I mentioned here before. And it’s true: my friends, family and lovers, not to mention the mailman, the bikini waxer, and this construction worker who once yelled something crazy at me on 8th avenue, are all in my writing in some form or another. Men become women, women become men, 40 year olds become wise beyond their years 16 year olds – there’s even one short story where I combined an ex-boyfriend with a cat. The point is, everything I write is real experience strained through wild imagination.

She also adds that she loves Scott Rudin and would like to stroke his beard all day—which is just, kinda weird. On the other hand, if that’s what it takes to get him to buy your screenplay, then Emma has something to teach aspiring screenwriters everywhere.

More Hollywood Jew on Emma Forrest:

What’s doing ‘Damage?’

Emma Forrest bares her soul

Emma Forrest strips, Heeb style

 

Emma Forrest makes Variety’s ’10 to Watch’ Read More »