fbpx

April 23, 2009

LETTERS: April 24-30, 2009

Israel’s Core Values

Rob Eshman, editor-in-chief of the Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, suggests that Israel should maintain the bedrock of shared values with the United States in order to avoid “quickly put[ting] Israel at odds with the administration of Barack Obama” (“Two Words,” April 10)  He adds: “For 61 years, Israel’s sales pitch to American Jews, and, by extension, to all Americans, can be summed up in two words: We’re you. Israel stands for the American ideals of democracy, peace, coexistence and justice.”

It seems that Eshman completely misses the point: The bedrock of shared values is solid as ever, unshakable, indestructible. President Obama and Israel’s leadership may find themselves on a collision course, irrespective of any statements or policies by the new Israeli government. There are much greater forces at play, and Israel has long lost its lure as America’s ally in the Middle East.

Moreover, Israel may find itself at odds with practically the entire world, simply because it exists as a Jewish homeland. Thus, Israel must be strong from within, know what drives it and maintain a course of self-reliance. Israel must be focused on its continued existence, on caring for its people and on continuing to bring to the world discoveries and developments that arise from its one and true treasure — the ingenuity of its people.  Israel is a light onto the nations, bestowing good onto the world, making it a better place.

We indeed have an image crisis, and “on-going bias against Israel in the media and on campuses” is not a figment of one’s imagination (or what according to Eshman is “what many American Jewish organizations claim”). The image crisis begins right with us, as we have strayed off the path of self-respect. We no longer recognize our basic duty to first uphold our own truths, beliefs and axioms. We fail to defend Israel first before offering so easily to “give it away.” We have become too politically correct, too concerned with the welfare of others before that of our own and with how would things look or sound to others.

We cannot expect anyone else to respect us when we do not respect ourselves. Nor should we constantly blame others for our own failures. Former Secretary of State Rice was very clear to then-Prime Minister Olmert, essentially relating the same message. The criticism of our enemies is a reflection and magnification of what American and Israeli Jews say in the first place. So let us stop blaming others for the hatred that starts within the body of the Jewish People itself, and let us cleanse ourselves.

We blame a caricaturist for correctly portraying exactly what Israelis said on the front page of the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. The caricature portrays a headless soldier walking the Star of David that is made to resemble a shark about to swallow or bite into the tiny, defenseless, innocent, starved Gaza. In response, the Anti-Defamation League and the Simon Wiesenthal Center top-paid executives in releases to the world cried “foul,” protested against the spread of “anti-Semitism” and called for action (i.e., asked for donations so that Abe Foxman and Rabbi Hier continued visibility would justify or overshadow their $700K+ a year salaries).

We, the Jewish People, must look inward, free ourselves from this disease of the great divide and return to unity. God, our common denominator, has given us the recipe: “Join them one to one, so that they become one.” Apparently, the divide existed also in the time of Ezekiel and God was going to make us one: “They shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms any more” (Ezekiel 37:22). It is not “left and right” or “‘extremist’ religious right and Peace Now.” We are all one people, the Jewish People, and we have the right to exist in one place, and only in that place — the Promised Land, the State of Israel.

Avigdor Liberman, Israel’s new Foreign Minister and head of the third-largest party in Israel, received 11.7 percent of those who voted to the 18th Knesset on Feb. 10; 394,577 eligible voters voted for Lieberman’s party, giving him 15 mandates, or one of every eight seats in the Knesset. Lieberman himself, single handedly, received an equivalent number of votes to all the Arab parties (Ra’am-Ta’al, Hadash, National Democratic Assembly-Balad) and the left-most party Meretz combined.

Eshman quotes unnamed “people who advocate on behalf of Israel” as telling him that “Their job got much, much harder. The reason can be explained in two words: Avigdor Lieberman [sic].” Eshman got it wrong: Our job is much, much more difficult exactly because of the failure of self-anointed advocates to recognize simple truths:

First, the so-called diplomatic stalemate with Palestinians will be easily resolved when the Palestinians decide they truly want peace and will be willing to pay the price for such peace (let them start by stopping all terrorist attacks and stopping to teach hatred in their school, on the PA TV and at the mosques). They do not.

Second, Israel giving land will not bring the peace we, the Jewish People, so crave.  In a recent visit to Israel, I asked Hagit Ofran, an Israeli fulltime employee of Peace Now who directs “Settlement Watch,” if her job would be finished and if Peace Now would cease to exist if Israel were to give all of Judea and Samaria in return for a long-lasting peace. It was Hagit’s long hesitation that provided the real answer.

Third, Liberman calls are exactly the same “bedrock of values” Eshman references. Do we not recite the Pledge of Allegiance, a solemn oath of loyalty to the United States? Did President Obama not talk about service and giving back, stopping just short of a national draft? Were we not raised on the motto “Ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country?”

It was the very same Inaugural Address on January 20th, 1961, that President John F. Kennedy reminded us:

“We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.”

So let us begin anew — remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.

Israel’s Foreign Minister said the very same things, but Eshman refuses to hear. This is not “right vs. left,” it is evil vs. good, and evil must show its sincerity while good must remain strong.

Be warned, Liberman is not the obstacle of peace. Liberman, the diplomat who lacks any diplomacy skills, is the child who shouts “the king is naked.” Let us listen to what he has to say — if we recognize the truth, we may find the way to protect Israel and ourselves and avoid a further deterioration of the “image crisis.”

Ari Bussel
Israel


Obama’s Rabbi

“Rabbi” Capers Funnye has expressed that black Americans are the original Hebrews and Jews from Eastern Europe are descended from the khazars (“Obama’s Rabbi Visits L.A.,” April 17). That and other nonsense should not surprise us coming from the cousin of Michelle Obama. Please do a proper journalistic story on him instead of just swooning over what appears to be a black rabbi. You want a real black rabbi? Interview some great Ethiopian ones from Israel.

Jason Sanders
Phoenix, AZ


Rocket Fire

I am pleased to read “Early Signs: Netanyahu Shakes Things Up” (April 10). The present concept of retaliation against Hamas rocket launches into Israeli towns has had limited success. The rockets keep coming. Netanyahu is an engineer, graduated from MIT (my alma mater). Engineers are more adept than politicians at analyzing and then solving tough problems. He realizes that a paradigm shift is necessary. Here’s my suggestion to solve the problem of rockets fired into Israel. 

Recognizing that Israel must avoid harming innocent people in the Gaza Strip when retaliating, Netanyahu’s government should issue a statement of policy to the world:

The next time a rocket is launched from the Gaza Strip into Israel, we give one-week’s notice to allow innocent people to leave an area of approximately one-mile in radius whence we deem the rocket was launched. And then we will fire back two rockets into that area.  This policy will continue so long as rockets are launched from the Gaza Strip into Israel.

George Epstein
Los Angeles


Lieberman’s Policies

There seems to be a bewildering naiveté on the part of many Jews when it comes to the subject of peace (“Two Words,” April 10). Is there anyone who doubts the Islamists’ intention of destroying Israel and world Jewry? With regard to Eshman’s editorial, the policy of Lieberman states the obvious. In an ideal world, or in the world to come, sympathy for the Palestinians, such as providing land for a state or a reversal of JNF’s restriction on selling Israeli land to non-Jews, would be in order, but for the sake of the survival of Israel, 1/500th the size of the Arab territory, these concessions will not “gain respect and peace” but “will lead to more wars.” Anyone doubting this should recall the words of Santayana and Einstein.

Although Meir Kahane tried to warn us, make no mistake that as the Israeli Muslim population increases from their present 20 percent to a plurality in the near future, the Jewish state will be overthrown democratically. As has been said, Israel cannot remain both a democracy and a Jewish state. Lieberman’s ingenious idea of having all Israeli citizens take a loyalty oath is not only proper, it is necessary. Don’t we as Americans swear loyalty to the State every time we say the Pledge of Allegiance, and isn’t it a requirement for all naturalized citizens to take an oath of loyalty?

In Psalm 29 we pray for God to grant us strength and peace; we cannot expect peace unless we have the strength to maintain and protect it.

Charles Lefkowitz
Rancho Palos Verdes

Rob Eshman’s article “Two Words” further reinforces my belief that the Jewish Journal’s obsession with Avigdor Lieberman is leading to angry opinions and abrupt lies. Lieberman is after political goals and votes, and tells people what they want to hear. He supports an Arab Jerusalem and a Palestinian state yet was labeled as far right by The Journal. The Journal even ran an ad in a past issue fervently criticizing Lieberman by Americans for Peace Now, a far-left wing, self-hating group dedicated to Arab causes. Lieberman is not Rabbi Meir Kahane HY’D ZT’L, but Eshman implies that he is a Kahanist. Lieberman pretends to grudge the Arabs in Israel to fake a hardline stance. Perhaps Eshman has fell into Lieberman’s trap and has won more right-wing votes for this dirty politician. 

Daniel Pereg
Beverly Hills


Tears of Joy

Reflecting on David Suissa’s seder and reading many references to that which I connected with, my tears began to fall (“Leaning Sideways,” April 17). Not the tears of slavery and bitterness, but of the heart space created at Passover seder, with David speaking with the 94-year-old Moroccan honorary uncle. They had both been present at the same seders for more than four decades (a lifetime in the desert) since the mid-1960s but had never had a real conversation. If David finally heard his story, maybe it is because David finally asked him real “questions.”

I think that what David “witnessed” hearing his uncle’s stories, was not only the uncle’s “liberation” but David’s own liberation. Maybe we can create a new seder ritual, similar to filling a Kos Miriam (which I love to do), which reminds us of the stories of the “women in whose merit we were redeemed” (Talmud). We can fill a shared cup with tears of joy from “dipping” into and listening to the personal stories told of what “slavery” and freedom mean individually today or what it did mean. Where is G-d in our life?

Yesterday, I “leaned sideways” while standing in Valley Beth Shalom’s kiddush oneg line and sitting at the lunch table. Sideways, saying “Tell me about you,” I personally asked Beit T’Shuvah residents, following their monthly awesome Shabbat service (held at VBS), about the real meaning for them of the Beit T’Shuvah Shabbat service we had experienced.

Rabbis Mark Borovitz and Ed Feinstein ask for personal redemption stories and offer Torah aliyahs (which are mamash / truly so uplifting). At this service, I always feel I am witnessing a Passover seder and I transcend and transform. (I was deeply moved by Rabbi Feinstein’s Torah drash at Beit T’Shuvah on “alien fire” eating our insides.)

Thank you, David, for your stories.

Joy Krauthammer
Porter Ranch


Plague of Plastic

Passover is over, but the trash that was generated will be around for at least 1,000 years. Garbage cans were overflowing with plastic bags stuffed full, much of which could have been recycled. But for those doing the Passover dinner, their impact on a landfill or the earth was not a priority. Passover dinner was the four questions or the reading of the plagues. The plague of plastic was not considered. The plague of waste was also not in many people’s minds.

There is a myth that technology will solve all our problems and that all we have to do is wait until the solutions are found. That’s like walking against a red light in traffic because cars have brakes.

Please, start thinking in terms of the four Rs= remember, reduce, reuse, recycle. Future generations will thank us. Each one of us has the ability to make a difference; it’s only the will to do so that holds one back.

What we leave is more important than what we take.

Saran Kirschbaum
CoejlSC member
Los Angeles


No More Hate

I am upset that I recently read two opinions preaching hatred (Rabbi Shmuley Boteach’s “Remember the Victims, Hate Their Killers,” Dec. 5 and Marty Kaplan’s “The Virtue of Hate,” April 10). We should be striving to rid our hearts of hate, and yet your paper continues to publish the opinions of those who preach it as not only acceptable but necessary. Certainly the deeds committed by “the hated” were abhorrent. However, how does it benefit anyone to hate? On the contrary, Mr. Kaplan listed reasons to forgive — mainly, to nurture the healing process. So, why then did both authors insist that hatred is a good thing? Mr. Kaplan recounted instances of hatred, mostly from the Hebrew Bible. Should we blindly follow the Bible, right or wrong? Boteach reasoned that, “hating monsters, however, motivates us to fight them.” That may be how terrorists motivate themselves, but I think loving peace would be a much better motivator.  Can your contributors think of nothing more constructive after a horrible tragedy than preaching hate — possibly the benefits and righteousness of forgiveness, the fight against ignorance and the struggle to teach the world’s children a higher morality that would prevent these tragedies in the first place?

Joshua Lewis Berg
Burbank


Call to Lead

To my displeasure, The Jewish Journal continues to be consumed with documenting what non-Jews think about Jews instead of highlighting positive Jewish values and contribution (“Blaming the Jews … Again,” April 10). Its cover article from last week’s edition, “Why Blame the Jews?” obviously demonstrates this obsession. A more troubling reflection of its lack of leadership in promoting values such as tzedek (justice), mishpat (law), and chesed (kindness) is seen in two opinion pieces on Israel’s recent incursion into Gaza (“Confronting Post-War Allegations” and “Israel Faces Soul-Searching Double Standard,” April 10). In both articles, readers are left with identical messages: Israel is judged too harshly.

If our collective commitment is for Israel to be “like all other nations” we can justify documented incidents of cold-blooded murder, the use of human shields, phosphorus bombs, the leveling of dozens of hospitals and schools, or IDF T-shirts boasting of killing babies and pregnant women. But if our commitment is to be a “light unto the nations” we cannot justify any acts of cruelty. No, our values would not permit such irresponsibility.

I call upon the editors of The Jewish Journal to be a light unto our eyes, a champion of justice, not a depository for the negative opinions of goyim (the nations).

 
Cantor Richard Schwartz
Culver City

LETTERS: April 24-30, 2009 Read More »

COMMUNITY BRIEFS: Survivor’s Mementos Tell Stories, BIMA and Genesis Summer Programs

Survivors’ Mementos Tell Stories

Holocaust survivors and their families got a chance to share their legacies with the public April 19 as Mount Sinai Memorial Parks and Mortuaries hosted a Holocaust memorabilia forum at its Simi Valley campus in honor of Yom HaShoah.

The event, “Keeping the Testimony Alive Through Artifacts, Stories and Music,” aimed to spotlight objects rescued from the Holocaust and provide an arena for their owners to tell their stories to younger generations. Items on display included photographs and paintings, historical documents and a belt and metal hair comb fashioned in secret at Auschwitz.

“I’m happy to be here and share this with people,” said Rachel Arazi, of Sherman Oaks, who told visitors about her mother’s escape from Nazi guards and channeled stories of her grandmother through an aged blouse salvaged from the war. “It’s important that there’s a continuation of the story.”

Philanthropist and Holocaust survivor Max Webb, 92, observed the artifacts on display and recalled a promise he made to his mother before the war: “If I survived, I would do everything humanly possible to bring back the Jewish faith and the Jewish people.” In the decades since then, Webb has funded schools, hospitals and dozens of Jewish organizations through the Max Webb Family Foundation.

“From the depths of nothing, these people made a life,” Mount Sinai general manager Leonard Lawrence said. “They made it their mission to pass on their stories. This gives people strength and hope.”

Community members were encouraged to bring in salvaged items and have them appraised by historians on hand to provide historical context.

The “Antiques Roadshow”-style event followed a Yom HaShoah memorial service that featured the music of famed Russian cantor and composer David Nowakowsky, whose family buried 3,000 of his manuscripts in 1941 to avoid destruction by the Nazis.

Westlake Village resident Hana Zafrani, a daughter of two Holocaust survivors, came to learn more about others’ experiences during the era. “We need to support our heritage and history and make sure the world knows,” she said.

— Rachel Heller, Contributing Writer

BIMA and Genesis Summer Programs

The BIMA and Genesis summer programs at Brandeis University in Waltham, Mass. are offering scholarships for the summer of 2009 to high school students from Russian-speaking homes. The scholarships provided by the Genesis Philanthropy Group are available for students entering 10th to 12th grade in the fall of 2009 and cover $3,500 of either program’s $4,500 tuition. If additional assistance is needed, the student can also apply for financial aid. 

To determine whether a student qualifies for the scholarship, camp coordinators often call potential recipients for further details about their family life. They also refer to the applicant’s answer to “Languages Spoken at Home” on the online application form. 

BIMA is a summer arts program that develops students’ specific artistic talents, including acting, filmmaking, musical pursuits, writing and visual arts in a Jewish setting. The Genesis summer program gives students the opportunity to take college-level courses in journalism, world religions, law and technology. Both BIMA and Genesis will take place from July 6 to Aug. 6, 2009.

To apply for both the summer programs and the scholarship, students can fill out the online application form for BIMA at brandeis.edu/bima/ or for Genesis at brandeis.edu/genesis/. Applications are reviewed on a rolling basis. 

— Jason Lipeles, Contributing Writer

COMMUNITY BRIEFS: Survivor’s Mementos Tell Stories, BIMA and Genesis Summer Programs Read More »

Payback Time

On Sunday, May 3, I will be at the city animal shelter in South Los Angeles, creating gripping mini-biographies about the dogs, cats and whatever other strays are residing there that day. The idea is to write those stories on cards, affix them to the cages, and make those wannabe pets attractive to wannabe owners. Want to join me?

Last year, around this same date, I was serving pizza, salad and dessert to runaway teens now living in a shelter in Hollywood. They were visiting a prop shop filled with cool stuff easily recognizable from their favorite TV shows. The year before that, I cleaned out the closets and organized donated goods at a drop-in center for Santa Monica’s homeless located right off the pier.

Over the past dozen or so years, I’ve planted public-school gardens and painted murals, decorated cookies for sick kids, each spring taking at least one day to move outside my comfort zone to go to places I’ve never been and meet people I might not otherwise have the chance to get to know.

One year, a good friend hooked me into helping him organize a carnival for 600 people at an elementary school in South Los Angeles; we brought in a disc jockey, clowns, face-painters, portrait photographers and much more. That day we also hosted a clothing giveaway, planted gardens and helped put in new fencing to give the kids’ lunch area more privacy. We worked alongside the neighborhood community, and when the day was over, what had been a littered and drab schoolyard had become tidy, colorful and utterly transformed.

I was transformed, too.

This all happened through Big Sunday, the nonprofit organization that is a big umbrella for volunteerism and, according to its Web site, “the largest regional community service event in America.” That Web site is also the place where you can sign up to “serve” next weekend, May 2-3, in ways that might sound way too interesting, enjoyable, or sometimes even goofy, to be considered dutiful: Helping your kids set up a lemonade stand to raise money for kids’ charities, anyone? Washing pigs (really!) or knitting clothes for preemies? You can also sort donated clothing, fix up apartments for the formerly homeless and cook for the ailing or elderly.

In this new Era of Obama, this kind of service has become cool, if it wasn’t already. Sharing, repairing, giving back, tikkun olam, whatever you want to call it. And if that all sounds a bit like taking medicine, there’s another message here: With Big Sunday projects, it’s often not the service to others that makes participating so rewarding. It’s the chance to get out of your shell and become more comfortable in your own town. To get off the freeway and into neighborhoods. To shake hands with people who don’t live right across the street. Or maybe ones who do that you’d never met before. And in the process, you do get to share a sense of accomplishment, and maybe even break bread together.

This year Big Sunday (it’s actually Big Saturday-Sunday or maybe just Big Weekend, but never mind) is expected to attract as many as 50,000 volunteers of all ages, ethnicities and backgrounds. Between 400 and 500 projects are planned (the number is still growing) to help some 250 organizations from San Diego (cleaning parks) to Solvang (home of those dirty pigs). And just reading about them on the Big Sunday Web site will make you laugh, cry, and hopefully jump in. To be honest, it sometimes seems hard to escape the day’s presence, even if you don’t participate. On a Big Sunday day, all over Los Angeles, people are working together wearing the signature T-shirts with a big colorful handprint logo. Open your eyes; you’ll see them everywhere. And for those of you going to the Yom HaAtzmaut Israel Festival the same Sunday this year, you too can join in — it’s one of the volunteer venues.

David Levinson is the face behind Big Sunday; he founded it as Temple Israel of Hollywood’s Mitzvah Day in 1999 with 13 projects, and he has overseen the event’s explosion into an independent, year-round nonprofit operation, for which he serves as executive director, aided by Sherry Marks, associate director, and a small staff. Last Sunday, Levinson was sitting in his office on Beverly Boulevard near La Brea, in a moment of calm as volunteers dropped by to pick up posters, flyers and other promotional materials.

It’s been a little rougher than usual this year, he said, because while there’s a great need for help in many communities, and a huge number of willing volunteers — from churches, mosques, synagogues, community groups, you name it — fundraising has become harder, too. Corporate donors that once gave tens of thousands now give a few thousand. That can hurt with an annual budget of $1 million (they’d hoped to reach $1.2 million this year, but had to lower their goal). So individual donations are welcome, too. What does the money go to? Well, while I was there, a great discussion was going on about moving donated furniture. No storage space was available, so alternate arrangements had to be made involving transfers from trucks to trucks. Each project costs money — all provided by Big Sunday’s budget — to provide materials, serve food, pay those vendors who can’t afford to donate, and all that has had to be handled more creatively than ever this year.

There’s also a great need for donations of food and clothing this year, perhaps more than any other year.

Still, even under pressure, Levinson has the laid-back air of someone who has seen it all, yet who knows how to kick the adrenaline into gear when needed. He’s the kind of guy who always remembers everyone’s name and is ever ready with an introduction. And even as the scope of the organization grows, he seems always tuned into the details on any project — and he’s always got a plan for how to make it better.

Over the years, Levinson has developed a remarkably convincing philosophy about volunteerism — that it’s not about doing good for others, but working with others to make things better. He’s got the spiel down, with catchwords like “our mission is not just community service but community building,” and the fact is he lives that mission. Sit around his office for a while, and you’re as likely to meet an imam as a rabbi, a mom or a teen, and everyone gets the same treatment. It’s infectious, and inspiring. It also means you end up finding yourself volunteering for one more duty.

Levinson, a playwright and screenwriter as well, has just sold a yet-to-be-named book on volunteering, from which he happily shared one secret with me: “Most people,” he said with a wry grin, “are willing and happy to do more than they bargained for.”

And he’s not afraid to ask.

So … about that animal shelter … there are some pups who would be very happy to see you…. What are you doing on May 2 and 3?

To sign up or for more information about Big Sunday, call (323) 549-9944 or visit this story at jewishjournal.com. 

Payback Time Read More »

Has Federation Abandoned Its Central Role?

Having just completed the Passover seders I realize that the attitude with which one asks the question is often as important as the question itself. The distance between the wise and the wicked child is not that great — it is the distance between “we” and “you,” between participation and alienation — but the response to the two questions is radically different.

So permit me to raise questions, because frankly I do not understand what is happening to our community, most particularly to our Federation. And everyone I approach — board members of The Federation, presidents of constituent agencies, even staff members of The Federation — can’t answer the question.

Perhaps a public airing of the question will yield a satisfactory answer. I surely hope so.

Why is a gift to The Federation this year different from all others?

In the past The Federation assumed responsibility for its constituent agencies, for their basic infrastructure and for underwriting the services they provide.

The Board of The Federation made important judgments as to the overall needs of the community and a gift to The Federation provided for the basic infrastructure — from rent to staffing, to programs and services — of such important agencies as Jewish Family Service and the Bureau of Jewish Education as well as to the overseas needs of the Jewish community through the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee and the United Israel Appeal, among others. It also supported important national efforts and national committees, assessed the merit of claims for such support, and made the appropriate allocations.

One could quarrel with the conclusions of The Federation’s leaders, but the process was somewhat clear and somewhat transparent, and the purpose was both clear and important. A gift to The Federation was essential to maintaining the infrastructure of the Jewish community, the many essential and worthwhile — and oftentimes unglamorous — activities that a Jewish community must undertake and the responsibilities we bear for local, national and international Jews.

As I understand it, this is no longer the case.

The Federation no longer sees itself as responsible for the collective infrastructure of the community, for the constituent agencies that offer basic services. Instead, committees of The Federation will now determine priorities of their own for the services that are to be offered, either with the participation of what had hitherto been constituent agencies or in competition with them. And the constituent agencies will now be responsible for raising their own funding and covering their own basic costs.

If this is indeed the case — and it has been explained to me numerous times that it is — then I have three simple, perhaps elementary questions.

  • Who, if anyone, is responsible for determining and supporting the basic infrastructure of the community?
  • Why should one give one’s central gift to The Federation rather than dividing the funds that one had previously directed to The Federation to support the basic services of the agencies that have now been forced to fend for themselves?
  • Has The Federation abandoned its central funding role and created a void at the core of our community?

For example, if we believe in Jewish education — which we definitely should — why not give directly to the Bureau of Jewish Education and/or to the Jewish educational institutions of one’s choice rather than to The Federation, which has now established itself as another service provider alongside — dare one say to rival — the Bureau?

If we believe — which we also should — that supporting the Jewish needy is now more essential than ever with such activities as Jewish Family Service, Jewish Vocational Services, Jewish Free Loan Association, SOVA and MAZON, why not allocate the resources previously funneled through The Federation to these agencies directly?

And if The Federation is but another service provider, how are we to know how good a service provider it is and what its priorities are in order to assess where funds are to be directed? The failure of the Investment Committee of the Jewish Community Foundation that took communal endowment funds and gave them to Bernard Madoff to resign in shame or be fired for lax oversight does not give this writer great confidence.

Permit me to stress that I offer these questions NOT as an excuse for not giving — I will give and I want to give — but because I am confused not as to whether to give but where to give and how to give in this most trying of times when those of us with the resources to give must give in order to meet the growing needs of those who have fallen upon hard times.

I know that I am not the only one who is asking these questions, because every time I ask them of significant officials in both The Federation and its constituent agencies, I am given a puzzled response: “Beats me.” “I too don’t know the answer.”

What is the answer?

Michael Berenbaum is director of the Sigi Ziering Institute: Exploring the Ethical and Religious Implications of the Holocaust and a professor of theology (adjunct) at American Jewish University.

Has Federation Abandoned Its Central Role? Read More »

Federation Services Mean More Than Infrastructure

As we sat at the Passover table reading the haggadah over the recent holidays, the narrative of the exodus of our people was recited and interpreted by Jews throughout Los Angeles. The interpretation yielded important questions that challenge us to recall the historic narrative of our people and relate it to our contemporary realities.

The organized Jewish community, as embodied in its central communal body, The Jewish Federation, also has a narrative. The history of Los Angeles Jewry and its development is reflected in its growing and diverse population, the sprawling residential patterns, the evolution of its institutions and its Federation.

In today’s Jewish Journal, a crucial question is asked: “Why is a gift to The Federation this year different from all others?” 

A simple answer would be to look around at the impact of the worst economic crisis in over 80 years. Consider how fortunate many of us are, when compared to the thousands without jobs, any means of support, or basic necessities.

At the end of 2008, The Federation was already sensing the effect the economy might have on our fundraising. Some donors tearfully explained that not only were they unable to give, but they themselves were in need of help. The Federation rapidly identified emergency funds and made an extraordinary supplemental allocation to four of our human service agencies. No other organization in our community would or could do so — that is unique to The Federation.

At that time, the scope and depth of this crisis were not fully understood. The Federation reached out to agencies, Jewish schools and area synagogues to determine the extent of the challenge. 

It is a tribute to The Federation’s leadership that we took rapid action, earmarking a half million dollars to establish a fund for emergency needs of Jews in Los Angeles. With the participation of the Jewish Community Foundation, the emergency fund was increased to $750,000. We established guidelines for making small grants for health care, shelter, employment support and emergency child care needs. We helped establish a Community Crisis Hotline. The requests began to pour in.

Meanwhile, The Federation went ahead with making annual allocations, locally and internationally, without reductions to the 2008 levels of support. A focus on making program grants to specifically targeted causes was essential to move us beyond support based on historical patterns. Critical times require new responses.

Many Federation agencies receive significant public support in the form of annual grants from the state or county. These grants might be in serious jeopardy due to the economic crisis. Our effective coordination of advocacy at the local, state and national levels is becoming more essential.

While taking pride in the services provided on a non-sectarian basis, The Federation also recognized that Jews in need require special consideration at this moment of potentially shrinking resources. This means making difficult decisions around priorities.

Services are deemed more important than supporting infrastructure. And although we continue to provide communal office space and other central services at the Goldsmith Center and Milken Campus, we are placing the emphasis on funding programs for those in need.

We also maintained our commitment to engage the next generations through allocations to our schools, campuses and young adult programming. We continue to assist in Israel and around the globe, and to enhance ties between Israelis and Angelenos in the areas of education, human services and culture.

Recently, we secured two major grants to stabilize Jewish educational programming in Los Angeles. Working with the Bureau of Jewish Education, day schools, Jewish camps and early childhood programs, The Federation will assure essential programs that touch thousands in the community are not diminished by the economic crisis.

It is obvious as The Federation approaches its centennial anniversary that we are in a period in which our communal narrative is being rewritten. We are in the midst of a crisis. It is not a war, nor a natural disaster, but it is indeed a crisis — once again calling for collective action.

Why, indeed, is a gift to The Federation this year different from all others?

Our Federation is approaching one hundred years of service to the L.A. community. In the early 20th century, when The Federation was created, most Jews lived in a few compact neighborhoods and there was no Jewish state. The leadership of L.A.’s Jewish organizations banded together to raise funds for organizations to provide critical human services to those in need. And although the fundraising purposes today are similar, the context is totally different.

I urge each of you who have the means to give generously to organizations that will make a difference. It will make a difficult year better for those who need help.

Please remember that a contribution to The Jewish Federation reaches beyond any single cause. It can ensure our collective future as America’s second largest Jewish community as we chart our course through the next few difficult years.

John R. Fishel is president of The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles.

Federation Services Mean More Than Infrastructure Read More »

Enough Already

My good friends Michael Lynton and Gary Ginsberg and I have had an ongoing conversation about Judaism, the changing role of the rabbi and our collective Jewish future. Three years ago, Newsweek magazine published our list of the 50 Most Influential Rabbis in America for the first time. There have now been three of these lists as well as two others, the 25 Best Pulpit Rabbis and the 25 Most Vibrant Congregations.

Now clearly we are not experts and we have never professed to be. We are three people who come from very different Jewish backgrounds, but we share a deep commitment to the community. At the beginning, we had hoped that the lists would trigger a conversation, some healthy and vigorous debate.

And guess what — we have more than accomplished our goals. Newspapers, Web sites and bloggers from around the world have become preoccupied with the lists. Jewish communal leaders and rabbis (on and off the list) have joined the debate.

Of course, we have been criticized and the lists have been dissected. There have been some personal attacks and some of them have been unfounded. But we compile these lists with open eyes, open minds and, to be totally honest, a hint of mischievousness.

One criticism seems to follow us every year, and it’s the one that galls me the most: The lists are too Los Angeles-centric. I’ve been hearing that gripe for three years, from The Forward and several East Coast-based bloggers, and, to quote from the movie “Network,” “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it anymore.”

Los Angeles has a great, organized Jewish community with innovative leadership and some of the most important Jewish institutions in America. It’s time for us to recognize our community’s strengths and let Chicago, Boston and New York know that the Jewish future is being formed here in Los Angeles.

Over the past decade, cities across the country have been searching for “cutting edge” programs and trying anything and everything that smells “transformative.” Here in sunny Los Angeles, “cutting edge” and “transformative” are in our communal DNA.

So what’s the problem? First of all, we don’t really know how good we have it. We need to get the sun out of our eyes and look around. We need to experience the best of Los Angeles’ Jewish community and then spread the word — first here and then nationwide.

Let’s invite the naysayers to tour the Skirball Cultural Center and the Museum of Tolerance, spend a Friday night at IKAR, Nashuva or B’nai David-Judea. They should sit down with Rabbis Ed Feinstein, David Wolpe, Nachum Braverman and Steven Leder and spend an afternoon with students at American Jewish University, Shalhevet, Milken and New Community Jewish High School. We have created extraordinary models here, like Bet Tzedek Legal Services, the Zimmer Children’s Museum, Vista del Mar and Big Sunday and the trailblazing Jewish Community Foundation — to name a few. It’s time for us to be a model for every Jewish community in America. We can and should lead. There has never been a more important time in Jewish life.

We need to learn some valuable lessons from Hollywood. Instead of selling the American Dream, we need to focus on selling the Jewish Dream. And we have the tools to do it. Los Angeles embraces every Jew, and every Jew has a home. This is truly an open community. It used to be that this was considered the last frontier. Many thought Jews left their homes in New York, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Boston to leave their pasts behind. We have proven that that is a myth. This is a community of immigrants who brought their traditions with them and have reinvented them.

Our best and brightest institutions reflect that reinvention and that openness to new ideas and to Jews of all backgrounds. Let’s be honest — we’re a young community that still has growing pains but is propelled by youthfulness. This isn’t your grandfather’s Jewish community, but we do still honor him (and your grandmother) by linking to our past not depending on it.

It’s time. When the fictional character Howard Beale had had enough, he opened his window, stuck out his head and yelled, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it any more.” I propose that this Friday afternoon right before Shabbat, we all open our windows, take a deep breath and remind ourselves of what a great Jewish community we have. After all, this is Los Angeles and Howard Beale lived in New York. l

Jay Sanderson is CEO and executive producer of JTN/JTN Productions.

Enough Already Read More »

Jordan Farmar and the Jewish (Hoops) Future

It’s the second night of Passover, and Jordan Farmar is warming up under the bright lights of Staples Center. His teammates have already slipped into the locker room to decompress before taking the court against the Denver Nuggets. Farmar is still taking shot after shot.

Peeling off imaginary screens, pulling up as he’s running down the court, stepping to the free-throw line. Swish. Swish. Swish.

Alone on the court before the sell-out crowd arrives for one of the last home games of the regular season, Farmar looks as dominant as he did when he led Woodland Hills’ Taft High School to the city title, as flawless as he did in an NCAA run that took UCLA to the championship game. It’s difficult to remember that in his third year playing pro, all with the Los Angeles Lakers, Farmar hasn’t been so splendid: surgery, limited playing time, a diminished role.

Farmar finished the season poorly, and in Sunday’s playoff opener against the Utah Jazz he played just under four minutes, registering zero points and one assist. Lakers fans have started to trash the once-popular back-up point guard who last year showed so much promise.

But Farmar is only 22 and has “nothing but time.” He knows he’ll get his chance and that he cares too much to let it pass by.

And despite the struggles, Farmar already is a well-known name among basketball followers. His “brand,” as he calls it, has been bolstered by playing for two of the most storied teams in college and professional basketball history and by an oddity that would have been unfathomable 50 years ago: Jordan Farmar is the only dual Member of the Tribe and the National Basketball Association.

Indeed, a sport once dominated by Jews now counts only one MOT at the highest level. And Farmar, who doesn’t celebrate Jewish holidays and considers himself spiritual but not religious, is no Sandy Koufax. At the same time, though, Farmar doesn’t shy away from his Jewish heritage, from the mixed racial and ethnic identity to which it contributes or from the pride that many Jews take in having their own hoop hero.

“People see me as somebody they can relate to,” said Farmar, whose mother is Jewish and father, who is black, is Christian. “It’s not something I even think about. It’s more them relating to me; just me representing them and their people and what they believe and stand for. I don’t make a big deal about it. I don’t deny it or don’t stress it. I just live my life and be who I am.”

Jordan Robert Farmar was born Nov. 30, 1986, at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center to Damon and Melinda Farmar. He didn’t come out of the womb clutching a basketball, but he might as well have. His father was a minor league baseball player and his godfather is former major league all-star center fielder Eric Davis. Farmar quickly learned to love sports. He started playing basketball at age 4 and never wanted to do anything else.

Like many Jewish identities, Farmar’s is complicated. His parents — black and white, Christian and Jew — divorced when Farmar was 3, and he went to live with his mom, who soon met a Jew far more observant than she had been.

Yehuda Kolani had been in Los Angeles on vacation. He told Farmar’s mother not to fall in love, and that he wasn’t going to go native. After he returned to Tel Aviv, Melinda followed and brought him back to Los Angeles. They soon married, adding another tint to Jordan Farmar’s multicultural experience.

“I was born in a Christian family,” Farmar said recently. “And then my mom and dad got divorced and she married an Israeli. He was Orthodox when he was in Israel. He came over here and really reformed a lot. He wanted to have a family and treated me like his son. Everything after that was being raised in a Jewish household. Doing Shabbat dinner, celebrating the holidays and all that.”

Farmar is seated on the couch of his Redondo Beach home. It was Saturday evening and Farmar spoke as he watched North Carolina thump Villanova in the NCAA semi-final game. Over the next hour, he talked about improving his play, building his brand and whether it was more painful to miss out on an NCAA title in 2006 or NBA championship ring last year.

“College,” he said. “I was playing a lot and felt like what I did every night would make or break what happened with our team.”

He shared vaguely the details of his Jewish upbringing, largely because his experiences were limited. Farmar attended Hebrew school at Temple Judea in Tarzana and became a bar mitzvah. From his days playing at the YMCA through high school, Farmar would invite his teammates over for Shabbat dinner. He would bless the wine; his younger half sister, Shoshana, would take care of the bread.

“And that is about it,” Melinda Kolani said in a later interview. “We have friends from all nationalities and all races and all religions, so [being Jewish] is not the major focus.” But, she added: “I’m proud of being Jewish, and I want my kids to know what it is to be Jewish and to have their heritage.”

Perhaps the most apparent legacies of Farmar’s upbringing are his deep commitment to family — he has, after all, never lived outside Los Angeles County — and his appreciation for the value of money, which contributes to his entrepreneurial spirit.

Farmar grew up in a 1,500-square-foot house in the heart of the San Fernando Valley. The Van Nuys neighborhood of his childhood is pleasant, tree-lined and clearly middle class. It’s a lot further removed from his mother’s upbringing in Bel Air than the 10 or so miles that separate the two. But it was home, and it was a good home.

“We didn’t have a lot,” Melinda Kolani said. “We didn’t have abundance. But we were happy.”

Making $1.08 million this year and set to earn $1.9 million next year, Farmar is still living relatively modestly. His Redondo Beach bachelor pad, about two miles from the Pacific and three blocks from Chabad of the Beach Cities, is spacious and luxurious but far from extravagant. He drives a Mercedes and a Cadillac Escalade hybrid, and also bought Benzes for his longtime girlfriend and his mother, but has avoided the trappings that ensnare so many professional athletes. (Sports Illustrated reported last month that within five years of retirement, 78 percent of professional football players and 60 percent of basketball players are broke.)

“I make a lot of money, but if I had to stop today, I would have to work just like everybody else,” he said. “You never know what is going to happen with your career. I could get hurt tomorrow and never be able to play again.”

Farmar

Jordan Farmar coaching a camper at Jerusalem’s Hand in Hand Jewish-Arab school

That maturity — the awareness that God-given gifts and talents are blessings that can be God-taken without warning — has been present in Farmar for years.

“He had this combination of high IQ, period — not just basketball — and was conscientious and a ridiculous worker and just motivated,” said Derrick Taylor, the varsity basketball coach at Taft High School. “He had the whole package.”

While starring at Taft — Farmar averaged 27.5 points with 6.5 assists per game his senior year and led the school to its first Los Angeles City title — he was already being recognized as a Jewish player. Often, this suckered opponents into underestimating him.

“I’ve seen many games, just a countless amount of times, when guys would be like, ‘What’s you got white boy?’” Taylor said. “Oh boy, that would light a fire under him and he would destroy them. He could just bring it.”

By the time Farmar arrived at UCLA in the fall of 2004, the Jewish community had discovered a star they could call their own.

“Everybody knows Jews can’t play basketball.” Or so Eric Cartman, the infamous anti-Semite on Comedy Central’s “South Park,” opined when his classmate Kyle, the fourth grade’s lone Jew, tried out for the Colorado state basketball team.

While humorous and more than a bit bigoted, this statement seems painfully true today. In 2009, notable American Jewish basketball players are the exception. But a century ago they ruled.

The Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame includes a handful of Jews. Arnold Jacob “Red” Auerbach, the legendary Celtics coach who won nine NBA titles in 11 years and helped integrate the game; Nat Holman, a visionary playmaker who was widely considered the greatest player of the 1920s; and Barney Sedran, who at 5-foot-4 is the shortest member of the hall. Moses Malone, though a Hall of Famer, was not among the renowned Members of the Tribe.

“Consider this,” said Dolph Schayes, another Hall of Famer who starred at New York University in the mid-1940s, “our greatest rival was St. John’s, which was a Catholic institution, and two of their best players were Hy Gotkin and Harry Boykoff. Every college in New York wanted Jewish players. Jews dominated the sport.”

Back then basketball was, in many ways, a different sport. “Today if the fans saw motion pictures of our play, they would laugh probably because the game was played below the basket, not above it,” said Schayes, who went on to be a 12-time NBA All-Star for the Syracuse Nationals and Philadelphia 76ers and the NBA’s 1966 coach of the year.

Speed and intelligence and precision took precedence over strength and size and athleticism. Not surprisingly, some found cause to denigrate Jewish basketball success.

“The reason, I suspect, that basketball appeals to the Hebrew with his Oriental background,” the sports editor of the New York Daily News, Paul Gallico, wrote in the 1930s, “is that the game places a premium on an alert, scheming mind, flashy trickiness, artful dodging and general smart-aleckness.”

In fact, Jewish excellence on the hardwood had more to do with sociology than biology. Like boxing, which Jews also excelled at, basketball was a favored sport of the inner city, and in the first half of the 20th century, few areas were more urban than New York’s Lower East Side, where Jews were so poor they often rolled up newspaper for their ball and used a fire escape ladder as their basket. The neighborhood was a factory for basketball talent.

Farmar

NBA Photos

Indeed, of the 110 inductees to the National Jewish Sports Hall of Fame in Commack, N.Y., about one-third were basketball players, coaches or commentators.

“This is heritage in a way you don’t think about it,” said Alan Freedman, who, as the hall’s director, travels the country and talks to children about the Jewish sports stars of the last 100 years. “If someone had done this for me, I probably would have gone to Hebrew school and not cut so much.”

Implicit in Freedman’s quip is what many at the time saw as an irreconcilable tension: sports or scholarship. Poor Jewish immigrants wanted their children to grow up to be doctors and lawyers; that left no time for mindless sports.

But Jews would find that they could excel both in class and on the court. And while basketball was in constant conflict with Jewish identity — “There is nothing more American than sports,” said Jeffrey Gurock, author of “Judaism’s Encounter With American Sports” — it also helped strengthen Jewish communities.

“Basketball played such a huge part in the Jewish community and was almost a centerpiece of social life,” said David Vyorst, executive producer of “The First Basket,” a 2008 documentary that explores basketball’s Jewish roots. “In fact, that’s how I ended up joining my JCC. I was playing in a basketball league there and I ended up taking a Torah class. It still works that way today.”

It’s just that Jews now live more comfortably and much more commonly in the suburbs. They still play basketball, but no longer develop their talent in the Petri dish of the inner city. And they can afford to, and are allowed to, play more bourgeois sports.

“The era of Jews being predominant in basketball is a bygone era,” said Gurock, who is also a professor of Jewish history at Yeshiva University. “It isn’t only a function of being Jewish. It is a function of being middle-class Americans and having other interests that attract them. They’ve outgrown it socially and economically.”

Basketball, too, has changed.

In 1946, when the league that would become the NBA held its first game, four of the New York Knicks’ five starters were Jewish. One of them, Ossie Schectman, scored the league’s first points. But by the time Dolph Schayes’ son, Danny, was drafted in 1981, only two Jewish players, Ernie Grunfeld and Joel Kramer, remained in the NBA.

“Basketball has always been colorblind, religion blind. It’s one of the most neutral experiences: you can play or you can’t,” Danny Schayes said. “Basketball is basketball. Being there to be part of the Jewish community was just the bonus part.”

Although he didn’t see himself as a Jewish symbol, Schayes was embraced by some fans simply because he was Jewish. A journeyman center who played for eight teams in 18 years, including the Lakers, he remembers being cheered on several times in New York and Los Angeles by young Jewish fans waving yarmulkes.

He retired in 1999, and until Farmar was taken by the Lakers with the 26th pick of the 2006 draft, the NBA was Jew free.

The small Jewish athlete corps has given way to an at-times searing spotlight for those fortunate enough to have made it. Top Jewish sports stars, past and present, tend to be household names: Mark Spitz and Dara Torres in swimming; Hank Greenberg, Sandy Koufax, Shawn Green, Kevin Youkilis and Ryan Braun in baseball; Benny Friedman in football; Barney “Pride of the Ghetto” Ross and Benny “Ghetto Wizard” Leonard in boxing; Schayes, Sedran, Holman and Auerbach in basketball.

Maybe someday Farmar, too.

The added attention often poses unique challenges. Athletes appreciate the built-in stable of supporters, but there is an expectation that comes with it.

Braun, who is known as the Hebrew Hammer and in two years playing left field for the Milwaukee Brewers has been National League Rookie of the Year and an All-Star, has been willing to carry the flag. But he didn’t ask to be a spokesman. Never was this more apparent than during last summer’s All-Star weekend.

During a press conference, Braun was asked whether he thought an off-the-cuff comment that Hall of Famer Reggie Jackson had made over the weekend was anti-Semitic. Too much was being made of too little, and, as the JTA staff quipped on its blog, “Poor Ryan Braun is expected to play Abe Foxman instead of left field.”

Braun, who grew up in the San Fernando Valley and attended Granada Hills High School, tried his best to neither offend baseball’s Mr. October nor anyone at the Anti-Defamation League.

“Obviously, it would be disappointing,” Braun said, “but until I’ve actually had a chance to see the comment I couldn’t really respond to it.”

Mike Bauman, a columnist for MLB.com, remarked at the time, “A player who wasn’t Jewish would never get this kind of question. If some prominent person made, for instance, an anti-Protestant remark, the Presbyterian and Lutheran players would not be quizzed about it. But Braun gets the difference.”

Braun realizes that he’s not just another ballplayer. He’s a Jewish ballplayer. Even though hitting home runs and knocking in runs and securing wins are the most important part of his job, he can’t avoid being what others need him to be.

“I think that it’s something that comes with the territory,” Braun added. “There aren’t too many Jewish athletes at the highest level. It’s something that I certainly embrace. But there are times when people expect me to be aware of issues, like that specific example.

“I didn’t have any idea what he was talking about.”

In this realm, Farmar and Braun have a lot in common. When asked what he thought about President Obama’s so-called Jewish problem during his campaign last year, Farmar, who introduced Obama at a Newport Beach fundraiser, said he hadn’t heard anything about it. Indeed, today’s top Jewish athletes, whether deeply committed or only distantly observant, prove just how remarkable Koufax, possibly the greatest Jewish athlete since King David, was when he refused to pitch Game One of the 1965 World Series because it fell on Yom Kippur.

“I wish people wouldn’t say — and I’ve heard this from others — don’t think of me as a Jewish ballplayer or African American or whatever. But that is the way we look at it,” said Freedman, the Jewish hall of fame director. “We all have that feeling of pride when we hear Adam Sandler’s ‘Chanukah Song.’ We are looking at them and put this pressure on them. I look at Ryan Braun and say that Ryan Braun is a great left fielder and a great home-run hitter and he’s Jewish.”

Farmar has picked the spots to blend his identities as athlete and Jew. Last September, he joined the star-studded Chabad Telethon and shot free-throws as a fundraiser.

“Jordan is a real mensch,” said Rabbi Chaim Cunin, executive producer of the telethon and CEO of Chabad of California. “He raised $66,600 in 90 seconds. How many people can say that? He made 37 free throws in 90 seconds. That is a lot of mitzvahs, as we say.”

Before that, in August, Farmar had made his third visit to the Jewish state. But this trip to Israel wasn’t to travel with family. Instead he spent a week leading a basketball camp for Israeli and Palestinian children, getting them to play on the same team and to, at least for a few moments, leave all their differences aside.

“I wasn’t trying to convert anyone or change anyone’s beliefs. I was just trying to open their eyes to just being kids rather than thinking about religion or war or anything like that,” Farmar said.

“For me it doesn’t make any difference one way or another who is in control of that area or whose region it really is or belongs to,” he added. “Like I said, I don’t practice religion like that, so it doesn’t matter to me. But to see people affected by it, it’s unfortunate. Being a kid from a multicultural background, I know that different cultures and different races can coexist and make things happen and work.

“It’s just that their beliefs are completely opposite, and Middle Eastern people are very stubborn. They’ll do anything for their beliefs. They’ll die for it,” he said. “So I don’t know if it will ever end.” 

In addition to those endeavors, last summer Farmar started Hoop Farm, a basketball camp he leads at UCLA that also encourages kids to be eco-friendly, and this summer he is hosting the first annual Jordan Farmar Celebrity Golf Classic at Sherwood Country Club in Thousand Oaks. The proceeds from the golf tournament will benefit the Jordan Farmar Foundation, which is run by his mother and primarily helps at-risk youths and children undergoing cancer treatment at Mattel Children’s Hospital UCLA.

Successful as these efforts are, they won’t change the fact that what’s most important when Farmar steps on the court is how he performs.

“The bottom line is he will be judged for the merit of his play,” Danny Schayes said. “One thing you learn in sports is there is no residual benefit outside of your play. It’s not something where you get additional kudos because you have a foundation or you are the only Jewish player — you can play or you can’t.”

And in that arena Farmar has been hindered this year by the first serious injury of his career, a tear of the lateral meniscus in his left knee that required surgery and sidelined him for a month. He’s struggled since returning, putting up weaker numbers (6.4 points per game) and getting less playing time (18.3 minutes per game) than he did last year. He hit his roughest skid in the last week of the regular season and fans have begun piling on, writing enough disparaging questions to the Los Angeles Times last week to fill out a “Bash Jordan Farmar Q&A.”

“Is it me or is Phil Jackson tightening his reins on Jordan Farmar’s sloppy play?” one fan asked. “His playing this year has been pretty bad, and I could not consider him to be the Lakers’ future starting point guard.”

“No, Roger, it’s not just you. It’s Phil also,” the Times sportswriter responded. “Take the last five regular-season games as an example. Jackson has used Farmar less, playing him 15 minutes, 14, five (all in the first half against Portland), 13 and 17. And Farmar hasn’t been productive. He has scored 12 total points during that five-game span. He has made only 17.3% of his shots, 22.2% of his three-pointers, over that time.”

Farmar is clearly frustrated. “He expected more of himself and a bigger year this year,” Taylor, his high school coach, said. “He thought he was turning the corner.”

But as the Lakers continue their playoff series tonight, April 23, against the Utah Jazz, Farmar is looking to reclaim his spot as their point guard of the future and to show that he can star alongside the best players in the world.

“It’s been up and down trying to stay levelheaded and consistent and continue to improve and help this team however I can. I’m still only 22, but this is my third year and I wanted to be farther along. Starting or close to it, definitely playing a lot of minutes,” Farmar said. “I have no concerns it’s going to work out for me. I care too much and I work too hard. Hopefully, we’ll be able to come home with a championship this year.”

Lakers fans and more than a few Jews are pulling for him.

 

Jordan Farmar and the Jewish (Hoops) Future Read More »

Author Speaks on Propoganda’s Role in Mass Murder

Los Angeles will memorialize the killing of six million Jews at a Holocaust Remembrance Day observance on Sunday, April 26, with author Daniel Goldhagen as the keynote speaker.

The annual event at the Holocaust Monument in Pan Pacific Park, starting at 1:45 p.m., is the largest observance of its kind in California.

Goldhagen, formerly a political science professor at Harvard, will speak on “State of Deception: The Power of Nazi Propaganda,” expanding on the theme of his first book, the international bestseller “Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust”(Knopf, 1996).

A son of Holocaust survivors, he is currently finishing his new book, “Worse Than War: Genocide, Eliminationism and the Ongoing Assault on Humanity.”

In a joint project with Jay Sanderson, CEO of JTN Productions in Los Angeles, the book forms the basis of a documentary probing the causes and nature of genocides around the world and what can be done to prevent future such slaughters.

The two men traveled together for six months, talking to perpetrators and victims of genocides in Rwanda, Kenya, Guatemala, Ukraine, Russia, Bosnia and Germany.

The 90-minute documentary, “Worse Than War,” is to be released in late summer and will be aired as a PBS television special early next year.

In a phone interview, Goldhagen probed one long-standing question: While ethnic, racial and tribal hatreds are as old as history, why do some turn into wars and genocides, while others don’t?

“The main difference is the presence of a political or charismatic leadership that can inflame existing popular prejudices into violent action,” Goldhagen said.

One obvious example is Germany, where Jews considered themselves fully integrated, until Hitler harnessed his followers’ latent prejudices and resentments into murderous persecution of Jews.

Another example cited by Goldhagen is the deeply rooted Turkish suspicion and hatred of Armenians. In the 1890s, there was a mass slaughter of Armenians, then two decades of relative calm, then the eruption of a new genocide during the fervor of World War I.

Goldhagen has taken a special interest in the evolution of anti-Semitism in Europe since the closing year of World War II.

“In 1945, there was a vast amount of anti-Semitism in both eastern and western Europe,” he said. “Then, partially under the shock when the horrors of the Holocaust became public, anti-Semitism lost its respectability in polite society and went underground.”

But since the late 1990s, anti-Semitism, often in the guise of anti-Zionism, has broken out all over Europe and has again become “respectable.”

“There won’t be another Holocaust, but it shows how hard it is to eradicate a folk prejudice,” Goldhagen said. “We have to remain vigilant.”

The gradual but profound decline in social prejudices against Jews, African Americans and Asians in the United States since the end of World War II appears to be without parallel in the world, Goldhagen believes, and barring some major catastrophes, is likely to be permanent.

Other speakers at the Sunday observance will include Lt. Gov. John Garamendi, L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Israel Consul General Yaakov Dayan, chairman Randol Schoenberg of the sponsoring Los Angeles Museum of the Holocaust and Jona Goldrich, chair of the sponsoring Holocaust Monument.

Complementing the observance is the exhibit “No Childs’s Play,” created by the Yad Vashem Art Museum in remembrance of the 1.5 million children who perished in the Holocaust. On Wednesday, some 2,800 children from private and public schools visited the exhibit, after previously studying the Holocaust in their classes.

Additional sponsors of the event are The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, Jewish World Watch, Second Generation and the Donald T. Sterling Foundation.

Free transportation to Pan Pacific Park will be available in Westwood, Encino and West Hills. For information and bus pre-registration call (310) 821-9919 or (310) 280- 5010.

Author Speaks on Propoganda’s Role in Mass Murder Read More »

Reform College Cuts Might Lead to Campus Closures

Due to unprecedented financial distress, Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion (HUC-JIR) is poised to make deep cuts to its programming that might include the closure of two of its three U.S. campuses. HUC-JIR has campuses in Los Angeles, Cincinnati and New York, as well as a fourth location in Jerusalem, which annually cost about $40 million to operate.

The leading academic arm of the Reform movement, facing a $3 million deficit this year that could swell to $5 million next year, is weighing its options for surviving “the most challenging financial position it has faced in its history — even more so than during the Depression,” Rabbi David Ellenson, HUC-JIR’s president, wrote in a letter last week to the institute’s community.

“We are looking at the college-institute as a whole to see how it can continue to fulfill its mission while still being fiscally responsible,” Ellenson said in a telephone interview from New York, where he is based. “We have different scenarios. We are really in the midst of a process. Everything is possible.”

Flat donations, substantial endowment declines and burdensome pension liability payments have pushed HUC-JIR to a “fateful crossroads” requiring drastic structural change, he said.

One of several scenarios the college’s board of governors will discuss at a meeting May 3 is the closure of two campuses in the United States.

Founded in Cincinnati in 1875, Hebrew Union College merged with the Jewish Institute of Religion in 1950 and has since become the Reform movement’s central hub of higher education. The college will award 167 degrees nationally this year through its rabbinical, cantorial, education and Judaic studies programs, among others. The Los Angeles campus, which opened in 1971, currently serves 86 students and will ordain 15 rabbis in May.

Faculty members at the L.A. campus have sent a letter to Ellenson and other HUC-JIR leaders protesting the potential closure of the West Coast site. The campus should be kept open as part of any plan the college’s board approves because of its profitable relationship with its neighbor, the University of Southern California (USC), the letter states, according to the Los Angeles Times. The two schools share some faculty and facilities and cross-educate students.

“USC is prepared to open discussions about buying or leasing part or all of our property,” the letter reportedly says.

Rumors, first reported on The God Blog on jewishjournal.com, began to circulate last week that HUC-JIR’s L.A. campus and USC are working on a deal to fold the L.A. campus into USC as a Jewish studies program.

At the center of these rumors was Stanley Gold, chairman of The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles and a past chair of the boards of directors at both schools.

But reached by phone in Paris on April 20, Gold, who is a member of the boards of both the HUC-JIR and USC, said he is not negotiating any sort of agreement.

“I really have a conflict of interest,” Gold said. “So I would not urge anything except for the two parties to get together and talk. USC values the HUC relationship very much, so I am sure at some point, if they are not already talking, they certainly will talk. But before there is a talk, HUC has to decide what it wants to do.”

HUC-JIR and USC have long offered joint academic programs — graduate students enrolled in the college’s Jewish Communal Service program can pursue joint master’s degrees through USC in social work, business administration, public administration or communications management. Officials at both schools already were discussing the idea of building a shared new facility on a part of HUC-JIR’s property as recently as January 2008.

Ellenson said it is too early to say whether the L.A. campus would be among those chosen for closure. “At this moment, I would not want to predict in any way,” he said. “Every campus is being examined.”

No campus is in danger of immediate closure, he added — any structural changes the board recommends in May would take at least two years to implement. Alternative scenarios propose consolidating programs but keeping more than one campus open, Ellenson wrote in the letter. A final decision is expected in late June.

Staff reductions, pay cuts and slashes to programming are occurring at institutions throughout the Reform movement, said Rabbi Larry Goldmark, executive director of the Pacific Association of Reform Rabbis (PARR).

“There is a lot of belt-tightening going on,” Goldmark said. “Even our large synagogues are not immune from this financial crisis.”

PARR’s approximately 300 member synagogues were set to adopt a resolution to “oppose every effort to close down HUC-JIR in Los Angeles” and commit to working with the college’s faculty and administration to keep the campus viable.

Closing HUC-JIR’s campus in Los Angeles — a city that has the country’s second-largest Jewish population — would be a “terribly short-sighted decision with negative ramifications for generations to come,” said Rabbi Steven Leder of Wilshire Boulevard Temple.

Rabbi John Rosove, senior rabbi at Temple Israel of Hollywood, said the loss would stunt an important locale for Reform Jewish advancement.

“I’m concerned that the American Reform movement would lose something significant if the campus has to close,” said Rosove, who was ordained at HUC-JIR in 1979. “Some of the most creative things are happening on the West Coast,” including innovative social justice and education initiatives.

The closure of two HUC-JIR campuses would be “radical surgery,” and the college board should do what it can to avoid it, he said.

“If it weren’t for the current economic environment, we would not have moved in this direction,” Ellenson said by phone. “Change is always painful.”

HUC-JIR’s board of governors in March approved $5.8 million in cost-cutting measures for the college’s 2009-2010 budget, including a tuition increase of $3,000 per full-time student — bringing tuition to $19,000 — and a reduction of at least $1 million in salary and benefit costs by trimming positions from HUC-JIR staff. Pay cuts were also approved across the board, including a 10 percent salary reduction for Ellenson, eight percent cuts for the vice presidents and provost, and five percent reductions for almost all other employees.

The cuts were meant to alleviate losses in revenue tied to a 20 percent slash in dues collected from the country’s 900 Reform synagogues, which cost HUC-JIR $2.5 million to $3 million, according to an earlier letter Ellenson sent out to the community. He added that several of the college’s endowment funds are now “underwater” and HUC-JIR will have to make significantly higher payments on its devalued pension plan over the next five years. The current state of the college’s general fund is “sobering, if not bleak,” he wrote.

Ellenson said the proposals to streamline HUC-JIR’s programs would help the institution weather the economic crisis.

“The key element is for HUC-JIR to maintain its mission of providing Jewish leadership for the Jewish community of North America, Israel and throughout the world,” he said. “That transcends any given locale.” 

Rachel Heller is a contributing writer and Brad A. Greenberg is a senior writer for The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles.

Reform College Cuts Might Lead to Campus Closures Read More »

Car Wash Brothers Face Labor Abuse Charges

Since two local Iranian Jewish brothers were charged with a 176-count criminal complaint by the L.A. City Attorney’s Office in February for alleged labor law violations at their car washes, many area Iranian Jewish business owners are quietly expressing support for the pair. And some believe they are being singled out for political reasons.

The complaint alleges that Benny Pirian, 38, and Nissan Pirian, 31, the owners of four car washes in Northridge, Hollywood and Los Feliz, routinely refused to pay their workers minimum wage, failed to pay their workers overtime, prevented their workers from taking rest breaks and required their workers to purchase uniforms and equipment from them, in addition to other violations of state labor laws. The complaint also alleges that workers who attempted to unionize the car washes with the help of the AFL-CIO and the United Steelworkers were intimidated and harassed, and that a manager at one of the car washes brandished a machete and a club in two such union-busting incidents.

The City Attorney’s Office also alleges that the Pirians failed to provide medical attention to workers who were seriously injured by acid burns, deep puncture wounds and severe lacerations while on the job. If convicted on all counts, the Pirians could face more than 80 years in county jail and more than $1.25 million in fines and restitution.

“This was a joint investigation involving the investigators from our office and from the United States Department of Labor,” said Max Follmer, a City Attorney’s Office spokesperson. “Our offices investigated this case for some time, interviewing more than 40 witnesses.”

The Pirians’ arraignment is scheduled for May 7 in L.A. Superior Court.

The criminal charges are just the latest troubles for the Pirians. Bet Tzedek, the L.A.-based Jewish nonprofit law firm, first filed a civil class-action suit against the brothers and their four car washes last May on behalf of nearly 250 current and former workers for unpaid wages as well as denial of rest and meal breaks.

The Pirians declined to speak on the record with The Journal about the criminal charges and other litigation, directing inquiries instead to their attorney, Mark Werksman.

Werksman denied his clients’ wrongdoing and said the criminal and civil cases brought against his clients were retaliation stemming from the Pirians’ lack of support for unionizing activities at their car washes.

“The criminal charges are baseless and rely on frivolous, unproveable allegations made by union organizers who are trying to punish the Pirians and their employees for resisting their union drive,” he said. “The union has launched a campaign of harassment and frivolous litigation to bludgeon the Pirians into submission, and this prosecution is their latest weapon.”

While many local Iranian Jewish community leaders declined to comment on the Pirians’ case, business owners in the community have been quietly supporting the brothers over the past few months.

“This criminal case is politically motivated since the outgoing City Attorney [Rocky] Delgadillo wants to curry favor with the unions before he leaves office in June,” said Houshang F., an Iranian Jewish car wash owner in the San Fernando Valley who asked that his last name be withheld. “These brothers are just being made an example of by Delgadillo to scare the rest of us car wash owners into bowing down to the unions.”

Follmer said that the criminal charges brought against the Pirians were not politically motivated. “The charges were brought by experienced career prosecutors and based upon evidence developed over the course of lengthy and complete prosecutions,” he said.

Bijan Yaghoobia, an Iranian Jewish former car wash owner, said many in the Iranian Jewish community are standing in support of the Pirians despite the numerous allegations of wrongdoings.

“There was shock in the community over the charges but a lot more compassion for these guys because they were the ones singled out over others. The belief is that they were at the wrong place at the wrong time,” Yaghoobia said.

Several Iranian car wash owners said their business has long had problems with monitoring laborers since many of their workers are undocumented; they often come on their off days to work for tips alone and sometimes they leave the country for long periods of time.

“I think the car washes are an easy target in the city for these labor violations, even though there are plenty of garment businesses, light manufacturing companies and even restaurants using illegal labor,” Houshang F. said.

According to California State Labor Codes, a person’s immigration status is irrelevant when it comes to their employers’ duty to pay employees minimum wages, allow for rest and meal breaks and follow all other labor laws.

Yaghoobia, who owned several car washes for 13 years, said car washes have long been popular among Iranian Jews and Muslims in Los Angeles since it is a profitable, low-skill cash business. He added that many car washes use illegal labor to reduce costs and prices, which in turn puts financial pressure on owners who follow labor laws and hire documented workers.

“The problem arises when you’re in an area where there are other car washes who are hiring illegals, or not paying minimum wages or hiring tip workers. You have to compete with them since they have lower prices,” Yaghoobia said.

Bet Tzedek’s current civil case against the Pirians is also not the first, said Kevin Kish, Bet Tzedek’s director of legal services. In 2005, Bet Tzedek represented a Pirian car wash employee in a lawsuit for failure to pay minimum wages and overtime in a case that was eventually settled, he said.

Kish said the latest health and safety citations received by the Pirians’ car washes were in December 2008 from the California Department of Industrial Relations, Occupational Safety and Health division.

According to records from the L.A. City Attorney’s Office, while criminal charges were not previously brought against the Pirians, a different car wash owner was previously convicted of labor law violations in November 2005. In that case, the owner was ordered to pay more than $160,000 in restitution to 11 workers and to complete community service requirements with Caltrans.

Yaghoobia said that while individuals may be quick to blame car wash owners like the Pirians for labor violations, the fault in such cases often lie with both workers and their employers.

“Both sides are at fault because, for example, you tell your worker to take a lunch break but he works through it to make tips and everything is hunky dory until one day the laborer gets upset with the owner for some reason so he goes to the Labor Board and claims he’s been mistreated,” he said. “At the same time many of the owners are uneducated about the state labor laws and the accountants they hire don’t always educate them about these laws.”

For more about this story and local Iranian Jews, visit Karmel Melamed’s blog at jewishjournal.com/iranianamericanjews.

Car Wash Brothers Face Labor Abuse Charges Read More »