fbpx

February 15, 2008

They’re saving me from ‘spinsterhood’

A girlfriend and I decided to meet at a mega-bar in Jerusalem to catch up — and not to pick up or be picked up; I’ve long abandoned the prospect of meeting my prince charming at a bar, particularly this one, which isn’t known for its intellectual clientele.

Sitting at the bar, my friend and I began talking, and a mildly handsome guy and his friends took the stools next to us. In a bid at picking me up, the guy stroked my “Kotel ring.”

“What’s this ring?” he asked. I briefly explained that it was styled after the Western Wall with my name gilded in gold. Eager not to give him any encouraging signals, I turned back to my friend.

During a lull in our girl-talk, the guy turned to me again and asked me what I do for a living, adding: “You look like someone important.”

That’s an original pick-up line, and since I’m as happy as anyone for an ego-boost, I asked him what he meant.

“You look sophisticated, highly intelligent and very sexy. I think that one day I’ll see you on television.”

Note to men: Flattery always works. He got my full attention. He introduced himself as Guy, and, with my full blessing, began to psychoanalyze me. He told me that I looked out of place and that my demeanor was unapproachable, intimidating, even condescending. I agreed that at times I can be snobby, so he advised me to start giving people a chance, to stop judging people superficially. He announced that he has special intuitive powers — it runs in his Tunisian family — and that he could foresee that if I didn’t lower my dating standards, I’d end up very alone. He took his forecast a step further by telling me that if he were to take me out to dinner, he’d have to put on “boxing gloves” — for I’m not easy — but he’s ready for the challenge. I’m not necessarily his physical type, but I intrigued him.

I was tempted by the offer and fascinated by his assessments — I know I’m not a typical woman of my age — but I wasn’t tempted enough to give him my number. I settled for a drink invitation, and as the night wore on, my friend and I took a stroll around the bar to browse.

Guy followed us, and I realized that, while he was amusing, I just wasn’t into him. Thanks to his great intuitive powers, he sensed this and turned to my friend, who also wanted to be psychoanalyzed. He told her that she likes to be around powerful people. Then he asked for her number. Gee, I guess I wasn’t so special after all, and he was just another “guy.”

A few days later, a friend set me up. While this guy was a little too nerdy looking for my taste — with his rimless glasses, Elvis-like sideburns and bookish demeanor — I nevertheless decided to go for it, to follow Guy’s advice and “lower my dating standards.”

This fellow, too, works as a journalist, and, unlike Guy, his approach was refined and polite. Our first date at an Irish pub was rather pleasant. The conversation generally flowed, and I forgave his strange, triangular sideburns and the fact that he deliberately didn’t leave the waitress a tip. He didn’t seem well-versed in dating etiquette, and it took him four days before he asked me out again. When he did, he had me choose the time and venue. I was a little put off by his passivity.

Eventually, his slow pace simply frustrated me, and I guess I didn’t like him enough to keep trying my patience. He couldn’t get his act together to plan a third date, and I told him that I didn’t think it was going to work. “Too bad,” he muttered sadly over the phone.

A few days later, I was surprised by a letter — via snail mail — in which he confessed his feelings for me through elegant calligraphy on nice stationery. He wrote that he knows he missed a step, that on the last date he had longed to kiss me (on the the tip of the ear, for whatever reason), and that he wants another chance. Over e-mail, I gently declined.

He responded with a line that went something like this: You’re afraid of falling in love, and to avoid developing a long-term relationship you come up with obscure excuses. I can help cure this psychosis.

This time, I wasn’t so gentle in my rejection.

So is this the new line that men attempt with women over 30: “Let me save you from your fear of intimacy”? Do they think we are so afraid of ending up as spinsters that they have to appeal to our lonely femininity? Are they so afraid of rejection that they have to resort to emotional blackmail?

Why can’t a man just say: “I’m into you! I really like you — your looks, your mind, your soul. I want to get to know you. Let’s spend time together.” And keep it at that!

If we are compatible, maybe a relationship will develop. And if we like each other — then, yes, feed me the line, please! Tell me that you will stick it out with me when I get needy or complex or difficult and that we will push each other to grow as people and as partners. For I’m not afraid of intimacy — I want to be in an exciting, healthy, happy relationship — I’m just afraid of intimacy with the wrong man.

And the man who uses the pick-up line “let me rescue you from your early 30s neuroticism” is definitely the wrong man.

Orit Arfa — www.oritarfa.net — is a writer living in Israel.


Orit sent JewishJournal.com a new video about her adventures as a beauty contestant in a Valentine’s Day pageant in Jerusalem.

They’re saving me from ‘spinsterhood’ Read More »

How the West was funny

We haven’t kept up with Ari Sandel since the nice Jewish boy from Calabasas came out of nowhere last year to win an Oscar for his hilarious short film “West Bank Story.”

Sandel, now a mature 33, shot the film about rival Israeli and Palestinian falafel stand owners while a student at USC. His takeoff on “West Side Story,” with its love-conquers-all theme, conquered the hearts of Academy judges and of Jewish and Arab audiences throughout the world.

“West Bank Story” was shot on a $74,000 budget, but with fame, if not fortune, Sandel is now backed by three agents, a lawyer, manager, publicist and part-time assistant.

His second venture, “Vince Vaughn’s Wild West Comedy Show: 30 Days and 30 Nights — Hollywood to the Heartland,” has opened to excellent reviews and is now playing in general release.

The documentary follows actor Vince Vaughn (“Wedding Crashers”) as he takes his live show with four young comedians to mainly small and middle-sized towns from the West Coast to Georgia and through the Midwest.

The Oscar win has also opened up a new speaking career for Sandel, mainly before Jewish audiences. When not discussing peace prospects for the Middle East, elderly moms try to buttonhole Sandel to “set me up with their daughters,” the filmmaker reports.

He has also become somewhat of a folk hero in Israel, where a newspaper rated his Academy Award as 18th among 50 of “Israel’s Proudest Moments in 2007.” Another paper reported his triumph under the headline “Israel Wins an Oscar (Almost).”

Coming up next, Sandel will direct the comedy “Brad Cutter Ruined My Life … Again.” It’s about a successful businessman who is forced to relive his miserable teens when the cool kid from his high school days starts working at his company.


Ari Sandel and comic Bret Ernst visit DJ Bob Rivers

How the West was funny Read More »

Calendar Girls picks, clicks and kicks for February 16 – 22

SAT | FEBRUARY 16

(SHABBATON)
leah@linkla.org.

(ISRAEL)
Celebrating 60 years of a Jewish homeland means nonstop partying in Jewish communities around the world. The kick-off is well underway here in Los Angeles, where Israeli-born songman Danny Maseng will perform as part of “Israel: 60 Years of Song and Story,”an evening of food, wine and dance. As an added mitzvah, five trees will be planted in Israel for every ticket sold. 6:30 p.m. $150. Temple Beth Hillel, 12326 Riverside Drive, Valley Village. (818) 761-0192. johnseeman@aol.com.

SUN | FEBRUARY 17

(FILM)
” border = 0 vspace = ‘8’ hspace = ‘8’ align = ‘left’ alt=”pick gif”>Brazil’s high buzz Oscar-nominated film, “The Year My Parents Went on Vacation,” is opening for a limited run at three Los Angeles theaters. Here’s a tantalizing tidbit from a review published in the Forward: “Set in Brazil in the 1970s, during the exuberance of a World Cup victory and the fear-driven torpor of a military dictatorship, the film shows what happens to Mauro after his parents go on a highly euphemistic vacation (they are leftists running from the government). Mauro is dropped off in front of his grandfather’s apartment in Bom Retiro, an immigrant enclave in Sao Paulo, only to discover that the old man has died. The boy’s livelihood soon becomes the concern of a group of the building’s Yiddish-speaking residents, with a surly religious man named Shlomo reluctantly taking the lead. Mauro — as unimpressed as he is uncircumcised — shows little interest in the Jewish goings-on around him. Visit ” target=”_blank”>http://www.sinaitemple.org.

(MUSIC)
” target=”_blank”>http://www.yuvalronmusic.com.

MON | FEBRUARY 18

(WINE + FOOD)
You don’t have to go all the way to South Beach for a wine and food festival. Herzog Wine Cellars brings you the best of both worlds with the inaugural International Food and Wine Festival. Kosher winemakers from France, Spain, Israel and California invite you to slosh and spit your favorite grapes before chasing them with chef Todd Aarons’ Mediterranean-style dishes. 7 p.m. $100 (per person), $80 (two or more people). Herzog Wine Cellars, 3201 Camino Del Sol, Oxnard. (805) 983-1560, ext. 305. ” target=”_blank”>http://www.templemenorah.org.

(THEATER)
Award-winning playwright Bruce J. Robinson brings a seat-gripping true story to life with director Alex Craig Mann in “Another Vermeer.” Set in postwar Europe, Dutch art dealer Han van Meegeren is in deep after being arrested for selling a Johannes Vermeer masterpiece to Nazi Hermann Goering. To free himself from prison and looming death, Van Meegeren must convince the authorities that the Vermeer is a forgery. Mon.- Sun. Through March 9. $20-$22. Beverly Hills High School, Reuben Cordova Theatre, 241 S. Moreno Drive, Beverly Hills. (310) 364-0535. ” target=”_blank”>http://www.uclahillel.org.

(THEATER)
Playwright Jon Robin Baitz, creator of the ABC series “Brothers and Sisters,” brings another riveting drama to the stage with “The Paris Letter.” Set in the early 1960s, a successful New York businessman has an affair with a young male associate, after which he becomes tangled in a tragic game of financial and moral betrayal, sacrificing friends, family and love. Ron Rifkin, John Glover, Neil Patrick Harris, Josh Radnor and Patricia Wettig star in this L.A. Theatre Works production, which will be recorded for the nationally syndicated radio theater series, “The Play’s the Thing.” Wed.-Sun. Through Feb. 24. $20-$47. Skirball Cultural Center, 2701 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 827-0889.

Calendar Girls picks, clicks and kicks for February 16 – 22 Read More »

How Jewish hawks won the advocacy war

The seminal moment in the transformation of pro-Israel advocacy occurred in the summer of 1993, when the Oslo accords were finalized, and then signed, on the White House lawn.

“The Jewish community essentially had trained itself in one direction and was being asked to turn around immediately,” said Michael Berenbaum, an adjunct professor of theology at American Jewish University. “It had advocated that the enemy was the PLO, and the question was, if all of the sudden [the PLO] are friends, they felt betrayed.”

It was at this moment that the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) broke a decades-old code and criticized the Israeli government. While most Jewish American organizations got behind the landmark peace agreement, ZOA President Morton A. Klein predicted the accords would not only fail, but that they would empower Yasser Arafat and endanger Israelis.

“They were completely wrong and we were completely right,” Klein said last week. “Peace is impossible.”

Seven years and 300 murdered Jews after Oslo, the Second Intifada broke out, rupturing the ground beneath American Jewry. Within one more year, 19 Muslim terrorists would hijack four American planes and inflict the worst domestic attack in U.S. history; Jews and the West found a common enemy in the Muslim world, and the crack in the Jewish community severed into two pieces—hawks and doves, hardliners and peaceniks, right and left.

In Los Angeles, the American Jewish Congress had dissolved its local office in 1998 and reformed the following year as the PJA, a liberal organization concerned mostly with domestic issues related to social justice. But the AJCongress reopened here in 2000, bearing little resemblance to its former self.

“People who believed that we could have peace with the Palestinians were shaken out of their misguided view and realized they had no desire for peace,” said Gary P. Ratner, the group’s western region executive director. “Their goal was what they stated openly: The destruction of Israel, whether through the violence of groups like Hamas or through negotiations, that will weaken Israel. I think some of us woke up to the fact that Oslo was a disaster and the peace process would only lead to the destruction of Israel.”

The Jewish state was under attack with no partner for peace; the old model of resolving conflict through compromise had failed. With climbing anti-Israel rhetoric on American campuses and the perception that international media had joined liberal Christians in taking up the Palestinian cause, the hardliners quickly captured the upper hand among Jewish groups in the debate on what it meant to be pro-Israel.

“It’s a painful moment in Jewish life, because there isn’t a place for honest and open discourse,” Gerald Bubis, founding director of the Irwin Daniels School of Jewish Communal Service at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, told this paper in a 2002 article titled “The Silencing of the Left?” “People can have very strong differences of opinion about where to go and how to resolve things, but that discourse does not have a place right now. Rather, there is a vituperative argumentation and excoriation.”

Amid this climate, major Jewish organizations slid into the shadows, abdicating their leadership.

“Whatever they said would upset somebody,” Jonathan D. Sarna, a professor of American Jewish history at Brandeis University, said. “As a result, Jews who were frustrated, who wanted to defend Israel and didn’t really know how or didn’t have the ability, they gravitated toward The David Project and its sort of counterpart in StandWithUs.”

That is a portion of my cover story for this week’s paper, mentioned here and here and here, about the ascendacy of organizations that have redefined what it means to be “pro-Israel,” of which I focus on StandWithUs. In seven years, a gathering of 50 L.A. Jews has grown into an international organization with a major presence on college campuses, where they claim pro-Palestinian professors and student groups intimidate and harass Jewish students. The rest of the story is here.

How Jewish hawks won the advocacy war Read More »

McCain loses conservative Christian vote, according to GodTube’s unscientific, but possibly accurate

Via the DMN religion blog:

GodTube is a Dallas-based online service aimed at Christians. It’s hosted a presidential poll that is no more scientific that me sticking my finger in the air. Self-selecting, non-random, it’s own population. But that doesn’t mean it’s not interesting. GodTubers (which sounds like a sacred potato, no?) clearly do not (heart) McCain. Specific results after the jump.

From my e-box:

  DALLAS, Texas (Feb. 14, 2008) – GodTube.com has announced that despite the recent sweeping victory for John McCain, a stunning new GodTube.com poll reveals that if McCain wins his party’s nomination, Christian Conservative participants would rather vote for one of the two Democratic candidates.

  With a slim 9.1% support for McCain, Obama has become a viable choice for many Christian Conservatives with 26.3% of the Christian vote, up 8% from last week.

  Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton showed no increase in the GodTube.com poll this week maintaining her 19.6% of the Christian vote while Republican candidate Mike Huckabee increased his lead 30% last week, leading the GodTube.com poll by 45% of the overall Christian vote.

McCain loses conservative Christian vote, according to GodTube’s unscientific, but possibly accurate Read More »

Godtalk gone wild

I spoke last month with Jacques Berlinerblau, author of “Thumpin’ It: The Use and Abuse of the Bible in Today’s Presidential Politics.” Jewcy recently caught up with the Georgetown professor and has this Q&A:

In light of presumptive Republican nominee John McCain’s virtually nonexistant “Scripture game” and his past skirmishes with prominent evangelical figures, do you think 2008 offers an opening for the Democrats to close the gap with religious voters?

Absolutely. You know, it’s strange: on many issues of great concern to conservative Christians (abortion, national security, showing the love to Intelligent Design curricula) McCain delivers the goods. But as I noted in Thumpin’ It, he has this longstanding history of personal enmity with their leadership. I once suggested in my blog for The Washington Post that McCain and conservative Evangelicals would benefit from couples counseling. When the senator from Arizona says ours is a “Christian nation” (as he did this past fall) what Evangelicals should hear him saying is: “please don’t accuse me of having fathered an illegitimate child” (as some unidentified Bush operatives famously did in 2000 in South Carolina).

That being said, a candidate like Obama would steal Evangelical votes from McCain and even McCain-Huckabee in large Kansas-sized chunks.

Speaking of which, you discuss a growing rift in the evangelical movement due to the rise of progressive evangelicals like Jim Wallis and the evangelical environmentalists. What is the state of progressive evangelicalism and how will it affect the 2008 election?

This is the big question: to what degree will Evangelicals behave the way they did in 2004. Nearly 80% of them voted for George W. Bush. That’s 80% of a quarter of the electorate! But I don’t think that will happen again in 2008. For starters, progressive Evangelicals are finding their voice. And a new generation of younger evangelicals is rising that doesn’t seem eager to focus solely (and obsessively) on abortion and gays. This is a great opportunity for Democrats. Remember: they don’t have to win Evangelicals—they just have to stanch the Kerry-like hemorrhaging they endured in 2004. That is eminently doable.

The book focuses primarily on how the “Scripture game” plays to Christian Americans. How does it play to Jewish Americans? Are the rules any different?

With the possible exception of certain Orthodox groups, my sense is that most Jews would prefer that Bible-thumping politicians put a cork in it. Public, state-sponsored displays of religion tend not, historically, to be good for a minority group once aptly described by Max Weber as a “pariah people.” Even when Christian politicians invoke the Old Testament they are usually citing prophetic texts and Psalms that they read in a deeply Christological manner. So Jews aren’t about to respond to that with cries of “yesher koach!”

Godtalk gone wild Read More »