fbpx

July 22, 2004

Small Shul With a Big Heart

When comedic actor Larry Miller and his wife first went to Studio City’s Congregation Beth Meier 11 years ago, the very small shul’s Tomb of Rachel architecture was less inspiring than watching elderly Rabbi Meier Schimmel toss one back at L’ Chaim time.

“He pours himself a blast of vodka and — boom — knocks it back!” Miller said. “That always impressed me as a real emblem of his joy of life.”

Since opening in December 1958, Congregation Beth Meier has been a quiet, unassuming little staple of Jewish life near the corner of Moorpark Street and Colfax Avenue. The shul — its name honors not Schimmel, but Mishnah writer Rabbi Meier Ba’al Ha’Ness — has about 150 families. While Beth Meier’s exterior replicates the Tomb of Rachel, its brown, wooden interior intentionally was designed to resemble the Little Brown Church in the Valley, the Sherman Oaks church where Ronald and Nancy Reagan were married. Only on the High Holidays was Beth Meier’s cozy sanctuary traded for the larger Studio City Theater on Ventura Boulevard, now a Bookstar.

“I felt that the smaller synagogue is more spiritual than the big one,” the rabbi said.

Now 88, Schimmel doesn’t toss back vodka like he once did, but he’s still in the game, reciting opening and closing prayers at Shabbat services, and slowly handing over the reigns to Rabbi Aaron Benson, who came to Beth Meier in 2003.

The Modern Orthodox rabbi’s Traditional-Conservative congregation has been rare among Los Angeles synagogues; it never has had a building fund, does not ask potential members for personal financial information and has been run by the same rabbi since it opened in December 1958.

In the late 1950s and early 1960s, Studio City was home to young, assimilated families who attended synagogues on Laurel Canyon’s other side, such as Temple Israel of Hollywood or Wilshire Boulevard Temple.

“They were Reform and they were not advertising their Jewishness,” said daughter Selma Schimmel. “There was only one girl in the synagogue whose house I could eat at.”

When Congregation Beth Meier was still new, its Star of David was stolen and a swatiska was painted on one of its white walls. Rather than quickly paint over the Nazi symbol, Schimmel left the swatiska up for a week — to be seen by all, he said, to “let my neighbors feel what’s happening here.”

Later, holes from a BB gun shot into the shul’s 12 stained glass windows prompted Schimmel to make the repaired glass bulletproof, while still portraying the Twelve Tribes of Israel.

“It wasn’t like the synagogue was welcomed with open arms,” said Selma Schimmel, who also added that the Studio City Chamber of Commerce recently held its monthly mixer in Beth Meier’s meeting hall.

Schimmel turned down a request to sing a prayer in Steven Spielberg’s “Schindler’s List” because he was too busy with Beth Meier commitments. When Miller was asked if skipping such an opportunity was a mistake for the rabbi, the actor said, “The core truth of a different way to live is that he didn’t miss out; there was nothing to miss out on. For him, each morning’s prayer is the richest moment in the world. So he wasn’t turning something down; he’s giving something greater.”

He is rare among Americans because he has stayed in one job for over four decades. Rebbitzen Rochelle Schimmel, who spent 40 years running the 125-student Beth Meier School across the street, died in 1981 (“For me, she never died,” said the rabbi). Now, Schimmel lives with his older daughter, Debby Bitticks, in Encino, surrounded by photos of his four granddaughters and six (soon to be seven) great-grandchildren.

He also is one the last of the pre-Holocaust generation of European-trained rabbis, a Frankfurt rabbi’s son who fled Germany in 1938, first eyeing America from the Queen Mary’s deck and, once here, becoming an Army chaplain.

Despite his theological pedigree, Schimmel embraces various definitions of family; when an elderly, childless couple’s parrot died, Schimmel bent Torah law and officiated at a little parrot funeral service, thus honoring the child-like affection the couple had for the bird.

Schimmel also wrote the, “Brotherhood Prayer” for his congregation. It sums up the small shul’s appeal to Jews and some non-Jews. The prayer reads, in part, “Father, I would open my heart even wider so that your love may flow through me to bless all whose lives I touch.”

Small Shul With a Big Heart Read More »

Your Letters

Carpooling

Students do it. Girl Scouts do it. Why don’t congregants do it? Carpool, that is (“Gridlock,” July 9).

Why wait for perhaps decades for better public transportation? Each synagogue (church, mosque) could establish and distribute a carpool roster by area.

Besides alleviating traffic and parking problems, it would create or enhance friendships between neighbors who might not even know each other and make worshipping a much more enjoyable and meaningful experience. Try it, it works.

Lee Soskin, Studio City

Ask a rabbi, and he or she may cite traffic or distance as the reason for less or greater temple participation.

Ask, as was done by the last Los Angeles Jewish Population Survey, the potential congregants, of whom 71 percent attended synagogue at least once a year, what were all their reasons for joining or not joining a synagogue? A quite a different picture emerges.

The most important reason for joining or not was: 1 — quality of the rabbi (80 percent reported as an important or most important reason), followed by, 2 — importance of children’s schooling, 3 — friendliness of congregation, 4 — cost, 5 — the respondent’s personal religious observance, 6 — the quality of cantor or liturgy, and finally, the least cited important reason was, 7 — distance from home, which only 56 percent, of which 25 percent said was very important and 31 percent said was important to their joining a synagogue.

While this data is 7 years old, I don’t feel things have changed that much as to seriously alter the general picture.

While I’m also an advocate of light rail and other forms of public transportation and convenience, I don’t agree that presence or lack of it has a lot to do with the major causes of Jewish affiliation in Los Angeles.

Pini Herman, Phillips & Herman Demographic

All Welcomed

A member of this community has brought to my attention the article, “Jew Jokes Not a Joke,” that was published July 2. In the last column, it describes the problem Jewish players had because of a conflict between practice and Passover.

They were designated as basketball players. This did not happen in the basketball program at Newbury Park. Samuel Goldstein was not on the basketball team nor has the walk-on coach, John Marsden, ever coached in the basketball program.

I think this was just an error, because Passover would not conflict with basketball practice, as the season is over earlier in the year. I believe baseball to be the sport in question.

However, I would not like to have any member of our community believe the coaches, parents and players in the Newbury Park High School basketball program would tolerate the situation your publication described. Rather, we welcome all student-athletes and hope each boy’s experience is an affirming one.

What happened to Samuel Goldstein is deplorable, and I condemn it in the strongest possible terms. I only wish to clarify what has been widely disseminated in your publication.

Steve Johnson, Head Basketball Coach AP/IB History Teacher Newbury Park High School

Bill Handel

I am disappointed that you chose to profile Bill Handel in The Journal (“Can’t ‘Handel’ the Heat? Turn Off the Radio,” July 9). Although he supports a worthy organization like Bet Tzedek, I feel his radio manner is often cruel to others.

He seems to feel that because he is “an equal-opportunity offender,” he can say anything, regardless of whom he hurts. I have listened to him on and off for several years, and I am appalled at his level of insensitivity.

Elaine Franklin, Burbank

Sudan Suffering

The horror and suffering in the Sudan (“A Dollar a Day,” July 9), which has been going on for some years, has been all but suppressed by the media until the United Nations, ironically, recently forced its hand.

For the liberal elite and the news media that speaks for it, Arabs and Muslims have become so politically correct that Arab outrages, even against once-sacrosanct blacks, had to be kept from the American people. There is little room left in international news except for the constant bashing of Israel.

Dr. Bruce J. Schneider, Irvine

Jewish Writing

While it’s true that Jewish American writers are writing in English — as French Jews write in French and Hispanic Jews in Spanish — you don’t have to write in a “Jewish language” to be a Jewish writer, any more than you have to be Ashkenazi to be concerned with the challenges of Diaspora.

Just look at the recently deceased Arab Jewish writer of Iraq, Samir Naqqash. He spent the greatest part of his life writing about his exile from Baghdad and wrote exclusively in Arabic — yet another “Jewish” language. Naqqash, who died July 6 in Petah Tikva, Israel, wrote about the struggle of Arab Jews to adapt themselves to life in Israel; he wrote of relations among Muslims, Jews and Christians in Iraq, and his work has been widely published in the Arab world — an exceptional fate for a Jewish writer.

Jewish writers must be, in my view, universal humanists first and foremost, as were several of Naqqash’s influences: Sartre, Faulkner and Naguib Mahfouz among them.

Jordan Elgrably, Director Levantine Cultural Center

Marriage Evolving

With regard to Sandy Frank’s article on same-sex marriages (“Same-Sex Marriage Poses Key Questions,” July 9), is he kidding? Although I find fault in all of his arguments, let me address two.

One, that we shouldn’t tamper with marriage because “every society … has had the institution of marriage.” Marriage has been ever evolving. It was only in the last century that it was accepted that people married for love. For centuries, marriages were arranged to better a man, i.e., dowries, and keep a woman from poverty, since she couldn’t own property or work.

A short 100 years ago, Catholics and Protestants couldn’t marry. A shorter 30 years ago, blacks and whites couldn’t either. And let’s not even touch polygamy. Thank God marriage is ever changing.

His other argument about raising children is equally inane…. “Marriage channels male energy into things like raising children and supporting families and away from things like crime.”

A man participating in the day-to-day caring for his child is a modern concept. This argument makes the case for heterosexual males to get married early and become dads fast.

It’s never taken a marriage license to make a baby. In the meantime, quite a few of the couples I saw getting married on television had their children beside them.

By denying loving couples their desire to marry, what are we telling these children? Are we telling them that their families aren’t good enough?

It’s time for us as a society to understand that families come in all shapes and sizes, and that no amount of legislation will change evolution.

Michelle Grant, Santa Monica

Your Letters Read More »

For the Kids

Day of Sadness

Tisha B’Av means the ninth day of the Hebrew month of Av. It is the saddest day in the Jewish year, when we remember some of the terrible things that have happened to our people since ancient times. This year, Tisha B’Av starts at sundown on July 26 and ends at sunset on July 27.

This Day in History

Many terrible things have happened to the Jewish people on Tisha B’Av. Do you know what they were? Answer the quiz questions correctly and send the answers to abbygilad@yahoo.com for a prize.

For the Kids Read More »

The Circuit

Business as Usual

Jewish Vocational Services (JVS) packed 600 people into the Beverly Hilton on May 20 for its seventh annual “Strictly Business” luncheon. At the event, L.A. biomedical entrepreneur and philanthropist Alfred E. Mann received JVS’ Business Leader and Humanitarian of the Year award. Mann was instrumental in developing breakthrough medical devices, like pacemakers, insulin pumps, cochlear implants and even an artificial pancreas. Mann spoke about his latest upcoming breakthrough — a spinal cord stimulator, which could help people with back pain, epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease and paralysis.

Mann, who has donated $100 million to both USC and the Technion, told the crowd that he doesn’t understand people who wait until they die to give their money away.

“Money is only worth what you do with it,” he said. “It’s a tool that if not used properly, has no inherent value.”

Also honored was Eleanor Hoskins, the director of the Los Angeles-based Career Planning Center (CPC), who was recognized for her lifetime of dedicated service including more than three decades at the helm of CPC.

Staples, Inc. received JVS’ Corporate Citizen of the Year Award.

Feeding the Hungry

Mazon: A Jewish Response to Hunger announced in May that it awarded $262,000 to 28 of California’s hunger-relief organizations. The grants span the entire state and support a wide variety of programs, including providing nutritious meals to people with HIV/AIDS, providing anti-hunger education activities in Humboldt County, assisting with food stamp outreach and enrollment and advocacy efforts in rural Fresno County.

And in the same spirit of helping those less fortunate, 1,000 inner city, at-risk kids between the ages of 7-12 were outfitted for camp at the eighth annual Camp Max Straus Clothing Distribution Day at The Jewish Federation Goldsmith Center on May 30. During the event, children and their families enjoyed food and entertainment, and the children received clothing, toiletries, laundry bags and other camp necessities provided by companies from the Los Angeles fashion industry.

Brian Weitman chaired the event, and Fox 11 News investigative reporter Phil Shuman was on hand to help distribute the clothing.

To Your Mental Health

Mental health advocates honored their own on May 14 at the Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel with an awards luncheon for about 450 supporters of Culver City’s Didi Hirsch Community Mental Health Center. Honorees this year included actress Mariette Hartley, Bay Area suicide prevention worker Mary Chung-Hayashi and longtime Didi Hirsch board member Beatrice Stern.

“This is my life. It [mental health] is something everyone should know about,” said Stern, who has been attending Sinai Temple in Westwood for decades. Stern received the Center’s Legacy Award from Nancy Hirsch Rubin, the daughter of center founder Didi Hirsch.

Center president Kita Curry encouraged luncheon guests to phone legislators in support of a proposed state bill to offset proposed mental health budget cuts. Chung-Hayashi, who like Hartley was honored with a Hirsch leadership award, said that new generations of Asian immigrants must avail themselves to mental health services, just as Jewish immigrants embraced proper mental health in successive generations.

“We have left our countries and come to America,” Chung-Hayashi said at the awards podium. “We erase stigma by telling our stories and asking for help. This award is a clear sign the wall of silence surrounding the Asian American community is starting to crack.” — David Finnigan, Contributing Writer

Jerusalem’s Day

The Religious Zionists of Los Angeles (RZLA) held its annual Yom Yerushalayim (Jerusalem Day) dinner at Sephardic Temple Tifereth Israel on May 19, to celebrate the 37th anniversary of the reunification of Jerusalem. The event benefited the RZLA Scholarship Fund, which helps Los Angeles youth attend Religious Zionist camps and programs in the United States and Israel.

Before the dinner, Esther Kandel introduced special guest speaker Daniel Pipes, the director of the Middle East Forum think-tank, who spoke about some of the issues Israel is facing today in the intifada. At the dinner, Esther and Walter Feinblum received the Boneh Yerushalayim (Jerusalem Builders) award, and the high school students who belong to B’nai Akivah, the religious Zionist youth movement, performed a flag dance. n

Deborah’s Honors

Barbara Balser, national chair of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the first woman to lead ADL in its 91-year history, was the special guest speaker at the ADL’s 10th annual Deborah Awards Gala on May 20 at the Beverly Hills Hotel. The dinner honored Christina Sanchez Camino, director of public affairs KMEX34/Univision; LaVerne Davis, vice president external affairs, Verizon; Sarita Hasson Fields, president of Star Staffing Services, Inc; and Kim Ng, vice president and assistant general manager, Los Angeles Dodgers.

The Deborah Awards were named after the prophetess Deborah, who in the Book of Judges was known for her courage, wisdom and leadership, and they are presented to women whose leadership in their professions and philanthropic and civic contributions exemplify the qualities of Deborah and the ideals of the ADL.

Before the dinner, guests were invited to look at “Faces of L.A.,” a beautiful collection of photographs of daily life in Los Angeles, which were taken by students of the ADL’s Dream Dialogue youth program. Dream Dialogue brings together a diverse group of young people from different ethnic groups who develop teen leadership skills in monthly meetings. Two Dream Dialogue Ambassadors, Shirley Eshaghian and Sina Grace, spoke to the crowd about how much the program meant to them.

Summing up the sentiments of the evening and the organization was singer/songwriter Daniel Nahmod, who played guitar and sang his original composition, “No Place for Hate.”

A Gala for Graboffs

Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles(JFS) celebrated its 150th anniversary on May 23 with a gala at the Regent Beverly Wilshire. At the dinner, Marc Graboff, the executive vice president, NBC West Coast, and Debi Graboff, a family attorney at the Law Offices of Rosaline L. Zuckerman, received the Spirit of Humanity Award, and Wells Fargo received the first Anita and Stanley Hirsch Award. All the awardees have been significant supporters of JFS. Marc Graboff is working to marshal the resources of Hollywood in support of JFS’ vital community services, and Debi has worked with JFS’ Divorce Mediation Project, where she helped mediate divorce cases in conjunction with a JFS family therapist. Wells Fargo has underwritten JFS dinners since 2001, and they also underwrote JFS’ “Still Listening: 150 years of Jewish Family Service” — an exhibition of art and historical artifacts that was presented at the Skirball Center earlier this year.

“Access Hollywood’s” Pat O’Brien was the emcee, while singer Barry Manilow serenaded the crowd. Jeff Zucker, president of NBC Entertainment, Nancy Tellem, president of CBS Entertainment and Lloyd Braun were honorary event co-chairs. The event chairs were Paul and Laurie Nussbaum.

Awards Awarded

Dr. Myron F. Goodman, the head of molecular and computational biology in the Departments of Biological Sciences and Chemistry at USC, and Dr. Michael Teitell, the head of the division of pediatric and developmental pathology at the UCLA School of Medicine received the Elliot Osserman Award for Distinguished Service in Support of Cancer Research from the Israel Cancer Research Fund (ICRF) in May. The ICRF underwrites promising cancer research.

Also in May, at Cal State Los Angeles, education professor Martin G. Brodwin and history professor Stanley M. Burstein received the $20,000 systemwide CSU Wang Family Excellence Award, which honors members of the CSU faculty who have distinguished themselves by exemplary contributions and achievements.

96 and Still Kicking

In May, Rebecca Matloff, 96, was inducted as a founding fellow of the One-Hundred-Twenty Society of the Jerusalem College of Technology (JCT). The honor was conferred by professor Joseph S. Bodenheimer JCT president, in a ceremony chaired by Frances and Dr. Stephen Schloss, who are also co-chairs of the Western States Region of the Friends of JCT. The JCT is a world-class center for the training of Israeli engineers in high tech fields of computers, software, electronics, electro-optics and applied mathematics, as well as managerial accounting and management.

Fabulous Faces

If you log on to Ebay you might be lucky enough to acquire one of the 40 Fabulous Faces, self-portraits created by leading women in the entertainment industry such as Penny Marshall, Roseanne Barr, Kathy Najimy and Julie Kavner. The artworks are a celebration of women 40 and older and are an extension of “Menopause The Musical’s 40×40” exhibit. The proceeds of their sales will go to the Women For Women Foundation, which provides mentoring and/or financial support through a grant program to organizations that serve women over 40.

If you are interested in purchasing a portrait, go to Ebay.com and search for “40 Fabulous Faces.”

The Circuit Read More »

Turning The Pages of Childhood

"Mommy, will you read to me?"

My 10-year-old daughter asks me this question every night. Even if I’m exhausted, or just want some time to myself, I almost always say yes. Before I turn around, she’ll be 11, then 12, then a teenager.

She will no longer need her reading fix with Mommy. "Time will not be ours forever," as Ben Jonson wrote back in 1607, when the printed word was still a new invention. I want to make this time with my daughter last.

My husband and I also have three sons who are older than Yael, which means I have clocked 15 solid years of reading aloud to our children. Because we have worked to instill a love for the written word in them, Yael’s requests to have me read to her make me feel that we have succeeded.

I take special delight in being asked to read to a child who has already read on her own for several years. (And her brothers all did the same thing.) Admittedly, if we allowed them to watch TV or play computer games for hours on end, the children may well have preferred to experience some frenetic galactic explosions on the screen to having me read to them. But we didn’t, and we have been rewarded richly for it. Over the years we have enjoyed countless delicious reading experiences together: Roald Dahl’s magical "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory"; E.B. White’s timelessly charming "Charlotte’s Web"; Beverly Cleary’s series about the irrepressible Ramona and Henry Huggins; and so many more.

I also take particular delight in reading to my children when they are already independent readers because I missed this kind of quiet growing up. Memories of my childhood are filled with the theme song to "Bonanza" bouncing out from one bedroom where my father watched, competing with the canned laugh track of "The Odd Couple" in the den, where my Mom and I watched. We watched others live imaginary lives more than we talked about our own real ones, and sat passively more than we engaged with one another.

I’m secretly happy that my kids complain — not about wanting to watch TV — but about a lack of books in the house. This, despite the groaning weight of books, often double-stacked, on every inch of bookshelf space we have in every room in the house. Their reading appetites are insatiable. Even when I read to Yael, one or two of her older brothers sometimes drift in to the room and take a seat. After all, who could resist this exchange between Charlotte and Wilbur — no doubt the most endearing spider and pig to ever grace the pages of a children’s book:

"Why did you do all this for me?" Wilbur asked. "I don’t deserve it. I’ve never done anything for you."

"You have been my friend," Charlotte replied. That in itself is a tremendous thing. I wove my webs for you because I liked you. After all, what’s a life, anyway? We’re born, we live a little while, we die. A spider’s life can’t help being something of a mess, with all this trapping and eating flies. By helping you, perhaps I was trying to lift up my life a trifle. Heaven knows anyone’s life can stand a little of that."

Who could ever tire of reading exquisite children’s writing like this, with elegant philosophy thrown in?

My husband and I may have fostered our kids’ love of the written word by reading to them when they were small, but they have continued to develop the passion on their own. Sure, it may partly owe to a Nintendo-deprived existence, but so what? In learning to love to read, they have also learned to love learning for its own sake. They have made this gift their own, and it will enhance their lives for as long as God grants them time on this earth.

As much as their reading thrills me, sometimes, even I have to pry their faces out from behind of a book. Even reading, taken to extremes, can become an isolating activity. I can’t always stop them from reading in the car, under the kitchen table, in the bathroom and, of course, under the blanket late at night, but there are a lot worse problems a parent can have.

When our kids are all grown up, I hope that their memories of our reading together, snuggling on the couch or in bed, will be among the most meaningful of their childhoods. I know that they already are for me. If I’m lucky, Yael will continue to ask me to read to her for many chapters yet to come.


Judy Gruen is an award-winning humorist and columnist for Religion News
Service. More of her columns can be found at www.judygruen.com.

Turning The Pages of Childhood Read More »

The Challenge of Raising a Mensch

More than any one single thing, parents want each of their children to grow up to be a mensch. I have asked parents and educators across the spectrum of Jewish observance and belief what they want most for their children, and this is the answer that comes up more often than any other. Interestingly, when I ask the same question to non-Jewish parents, I get the same answer, though they don’t use the same word. Parents want their children to grow up to be knowledgeable, responsible, nonviolent and caring. They want their kids to be concerned for others, their families and communities; good team players, yet also possess good leadership skills; decent and ethical; to love justice; to feel compassion for others and to act on those feelings; and be the kind of person one can count on, an all-around complete human being. In other words: a mensch.

Menschlekayt is the chicken soup of parenting for those raising Jewish children. If one’s children possess this attribute, then one can be as assured as reasonably possible that they will avoid becoming headlines in the local and national news for committing acts of violence to others, or to themselves. And there is a good chance they will be a source of positive news in the community and beyond.

For Jewish parents, there is the additional challenge of raising a mensch with Jewish sensitivity and Jewish identity. This is no small feat. Child psychiatrist James Comer points out that the 21st century marks the first time in human history that children are receiving the majority of their information unfiltered by adult caretakers. This deserves rereading and contemplation. In essence, it means that now, more than ever, parental influence is in competition with the relentless forces of popular culture, the ideas of peers, and the mass media. Combine this with what Cornell child development specialist Uri Bronfenbrenner calls the “hecticness” of our lives now, and the seemingly increasing time demands made by many workplaces, and it is clear that parents are overmatched.

Parents do not have undiluted influence by virtue of being parents. Our biblical command to honor parents does not imply we will automatically learn from them. We are all part of the great marketplace of ideas and values. Parents must think quite consciously and carefully about their parenting if they want to be a primary source of influence on their children.

“In a place where there are no good people, strive to be a good person” (Pirke Avot 2:6).

Our traditions give us much guidance about how to proceed. It is the parents’ job, despite the odds, to be a model of menschlekayt. Not a model of perfection, but of human decency. And there is now a recognition in the popular culture that this is necessary, that we have moved too far with regard to individualism, consumerism and the worship of cognitive capabilities. We have been endowed as human beings with what Josef Levi, recently retired superintendent of schools for the Tel Aviv Metropolitan School District, calls the “wisdom of the heart” — binat halev.

It is what Daniel Goleman would refer to as “emotional intelligence.” Goleman’s worldwide bestseller, “Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ” (Bantam, 1997), makes it clear that advances in brain research, understanding the nature of human emotion and the operation of effective school-based programs to build children’s social skills provides insight into how to strengthen positive influences on our children. More to the point, the way in which people have grasped the idea of emotional intelligence and its application to everyday life — especially teaching and parenting — is a signal that positive change is on the horizon. So is the emphasis on character education in schools across the United States.

“There needs to be a gyroscope in the mind of the Jewish parent to keep him or her focused in the tumult of everyday life,” said Yakov R. Hilsenrath, rabbi emeritus of the Highland Park Conservative Temple and Center in New Jersey and longtime innovator in Jewish parenting education.

“What is needed is a conscious return to Jewish values, steering a careful course between the extremes of denial on the one hand and pleasure-seeking and self-indulgence on the other. In so doing, we should understand that our children, as creatures of the Almighty, must be treated no differently from the way we are expected to treat ourselves,” he said.

Parents cannot abdicate their responsibility to moderate the messages and values that find their way to our children. This is not to advocate a high degree of restrictiveness; rather, it is to focus parents on the need to monitor, to make choices and to sometimes be willing to set and sustain limits to what children can and cannot see, hear, and do. Parents will make different decisions about such things as R-rated movies, computer games, drinking alcohol, curfews and the nature of clothing acceptable for school and family functions.

But the decision to “go along” with what “everyone else is doing” — whether implicit or explicit, does great disservice to children and does not fulfill our parental responsibility to “teach children to swim” in the sea of life.

But the tumult of these times is so great, and the currents so strong, that parents need even stronger gyroscopic aids. Hence, my colleagues Steven Tobias and Brian Friedlander and I have coined a new version of the Golden Rule for the 21st century, the 24-Karat Golden Rule of Emotionally Intelligent Parenting: Do unto your children as you would have others do unto your children.

Nowhere is this more applicable than the way in which we talk to children (and I would hasten that this advice, though focused on parents, is no less applicable to teachers). If we think very carefully and honestly about what we say to our children and how we say it, we might find ourselves wondering how we would react if a neighbor or a lunchroom aide or someone working in a store spoke to our child in the same way, using the same words and same tone of voice.

Why is this significant? Isn’t all this just as it always has been? Isn’t it true that our children were fine in the past and are fine now? Sadly, times have changed. Rates of depression, anxiety and antisocial behavior in children are on the upswing and are not at their low points. Recent research on the operation of the brain and the creation of human memory makes it clear that children remember not only information, but also the context in which something was said and the emotional tone present at the time. We can deny that this is so or wish it were not so, but it doesn’t change the reality. How, when and where we say what we say is as important as what we say. Parents today are under great financial, work and personal pressures, pressures that lead to short tempers, unplanned outbursts and poor choices of words. And it is well worth remembering that the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem had a great deal to do with the disrespectful way in which people spoke to one another, with lashon hara (gossip and slander).

If we want to raise children to be mensches, there is no more important place to start than with how we, their parents, treat them, If we treat them with respect, then they are likely to treat others that same way. If we are sensitive to them, they will exhibit that toward others. If we are fair, honest, not afraid of correcting them (even punishing them), but do so constructively, we will find that they are more likely to be that way when dealing with others — and with us, when we are older and in a position to need their care. There is no doubt that parenting for menschlekayt — what my colleagues and I refer to more generally as parenting with emotional intelligence — will involve courageous action, parenting with the heart in mind and keeping Jewish values active in one’s choices.

“The decisions made by parents clarify for children their parents’ level of human sensitivity and moral choice,” said Rabbi Hilsenrath.

From such choices, a mensch can emerge.

Pirke Avot informs us, “You are not expected to finish the job, but you are not free to quit” (2:21). Ultimately, it takes a kehilla, a community, to raise a mensch. The growing disconnection of our children from their Jewish education and Jewish values are not simple failures of parents or children, but rather they are failures of community. Schools, peer groups, neighborhoods and religious institutions must be vigilant, concerned, and involved.

While there is a Jewish communal responsibility to aid parents in this increasingly challenging task, it is the parents who must set the tone in their everyday lives. We do this not with pronouncements, but in the way we interact with children in the car, at meals, when we are under pressure and when they are feeling stressed, also. We need not be perfect, only human. We know from Exodus that when it came time to build the mishkan (the ark of the covenant), only those who had “wisdom of the heart” were allowed to be involved. These were not necessarily the most talented individuals; rather, they combined talent and personal integrity to an optimal degree. Those were the qualities desired. For our era, in education and in parenting, such wisdom is an important, contemporary, yet traditional and enduring way of working toward the goal of raising a child who is a mensch.

This article originally appeared in Jewish Values for Growing Exceptional Jewish Children,. vol. 2, published by the Coalition for the Advancement of Jewish Education (CAJE). For more information visit

The Challenge of Raising a Mensch Read More »

The Last-Minute Pajama Party

The Invitation Process

“It’s already been decided,” my 6-year-old announces with an impish smile and a green-eyed glint.

“What’s been decided, honey?” I ask.

“My first sleepover party. I invited Julia, Emma and Rachel to sleep over this weekend.”

“Noa,” I say slowly, wondering who has a slumber party in kindergarten. “Do their mothers know about this?”

“Don’t worry. Their mommies will know tonight,” she says, patting my arm.

And then suddenly I remember: I’m the Mommy: “How about asking me first?”

Her voice softens, her eyes widen and twinkle: “Can I? It will be so much fun. Please, Mommy.”

Fun. It’s not her birthday, or any special occasion, but on the other hand, I haven’t seen her look so excited since the divorce.

Her sister, Maya, light-up sneakers planted firmly in the linoleum floor, grabs Noa’s arm. “But you can’t forget about me.”

Noa takes her 4-year-old sister’s hand. “You’ll get to sleep in the middle,” she says. “And I’ll make sure no one’s mean to you.”

My mini Powerpuff Girls. They know how to work me. No, I realize at that point is not an option.

“So who is coming to this slumber party?” I ask with a smile.

“Everyone,” Noa says.

“Noa,” I say, did you ask only those three girls?”

“Well, I did mention it to Alexandra, Sarah, Rosie and Danielle.”

“Is there anyone else I should know about?” I ask her.

It turns out she invited 10 girls. Ten girls in my house for one weekend. We didn’t send out invitations, didn’t do E-vite, just a formal word-of-mouth invitation. That’s how the party begins.

The Preparations

I am no longer the lone single mother in a class of 20. Overnight, thanks to my daughter, I have become Britney Spears’ mother — aka “kindergarten corrupter.”

When you have a slumber party, you’re not only inviting the kids, but involving the parents as well. For the next few days, the telephone rings incessantly.

• Alexandra’s mother: What time do you plan to send them to bed?

• Rachel’s mother: What movie are you showing them?

• Emma’s mother: What will they be eating and drinking?

• Danielle’s mother: What happens if she wakes up in the middle of the night?

I quickly improvise the party plan, and tell the mothers that the girls will be in bed no later than 10 p.m., they’ll have pizza, cut-up fruit, drinks and some junk, I’ll rent “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory” and if they wake up, I’ll put them back to sleep. I feel exhausted by the list of questioning, but then I realize that if I were sending Noa out, I’d do the same thing.

The phone rings again. It’s Lexy’s Mother, who lives in a mansion with two kids, no pets, a nanny and a live-in housekeeper. I repeat all the party plans.

“You’re so brave,” she says.

How ’bout loaning me your SWAT team for a night? I want to say, but instead say, “Thanks, I was a camp counselor for 10 years. I’m sure I can do it.”

Can I? Two days before the party I run into Sarah’s mother at the gym.

“Sarah’s been X’d off the list,” she says.

I tell her that’s impossible.

“Sarah went in front of the class yesterday to tell a story about how she is taking skating lessons,” her mother says. “Noa found out the story wasn’t true, and she told Sarah that people who lie are not allowed in your house.”

I laugh to myself, secretly pleased that my words actually do have an impact.

“I’ll talk to Noa,” I tell her.

Over dinner that night I tell Noa that no one is allowed to be X’d from our sleepover.

“It’s not nice,” I say, “It hurts people’s feelings — even if Sarah lied.”

Noa replies: “Well, that’s why I didn’t invite Nicole either. She lied about a library book.”

The dish in my hand falls to the sink. “Who’s Nicole?”

Pre-party Jitters

My girls and I head to the supermarket. We pick up enough junk food to feed an army and a navy. Then I remember allergies and put half the stuff back. I add products without peanuts, some lactose-free items and lots of junk.

We get home and unpack the goodies, and as I get ready to make dinner Noa turns to me and says, “Mommy, I don’t have a sleeping bag.”

Her sister: “Me either.”

Sleeping bags. How could I forget?

Noa: “And I want one that’s light blue with a big butterfly on it.”

Maya: “And I want one with a princess on it.”

Off to Target. Seventeen minutes, two sleeping bags, one with a butterfly and one with a princess. I turn to Noa, and see that the social butterfly’s eyes are tearing up.

I can’t think of anything we’ve forgotten.

“What’s wrong?” I ask.

“What if they don’t come? What if we buy all this food, make everything fun and nobody sleeps over? What if they don’t like the movie? What if….”

Maya wraps her arms around her older sister: “Don’t worry, I’ll be there.”

This doesn’t comfort her.

“Well, Mommy, I don’t want to have this party anyway,” she says. “It’s all your fault. You invited people I don’t like! You invited everybody!”

I glare at her, and borrow a line from a movie. “If you build it they will come.”

Her forehead crinkles: “What does that mean?”

“I don’t know,” I shrug. “But it sounds good doesn’t it?”

We return home. Bath, brush, book and bed. Finally, I can relax. The phone rings. It’s Molly’s mom: “Molly’s been throwing up all day. I’m sorry she won’t be there tomorrow.”

One down, 10 to go.

The Party

It’s Saturday, D-day.

What to wear? I’m opting for the authoritative-but-not-trying-too-hard look: Yes, I’m fun, but in control. I settle on slim black pants and a buttoned-down shirt. (The don’t-worry-your-daughters-will-come-back-in-one-piece look.)

6 p.m. Noa and Maya are so excited. I take a deep breath. Pizza’s been ordered, kid music is on, fruit and junk are evenly distributed around the room, the video is rewound: Showtime.

The parents arrive one by one, with nervous expressions. Three of them say they are going to pick up their kids at 10 p.m. but brought their sleeping bags just in case.

6:45 p.m. Finally all the girls are here — filed with giggles and stories. Noa is ringleader; Maya, her devoted lieutenant. Everyone is ready for pizza, movie and sweets (fruit is ignored). The night flows from food and flick to charades and freeze-dance to getting ready for bed. The girls are so unexpectedly well-behaved and fun that I pinch myself.

11:07 p.m. After telling five stories, all the girls are down. I mentally pat myself on the back: I did it. I check on the girls once again and then crawl into bed.

2:45 a.m. I am awakened by a shrill scream: “I want my mommy!” I race to get the crying girl out of the room, fearing a domino reaction. I bring her to bed, tell her a story and rub her back. She puts her thumb in her mouth and bobs her head. Twenty minutes later, she’s down.

3:30 a.m. “Where’s Poppy?” Another little girl howling for her stuffed animal. I find Poppy at the bottom of the sleeping bag, rub her back and she’s down.

4:15 a.m. Maya stumbles into my room. “Mommy, why is Sarah in your bed? She’s in my spot. Move her over.” I shift Sarah to the far side of the bed. Maya recovers her territory. Within minutes, she, too, is down.

5:20 a.m. Noa opens my crusty eyelids with her fingers: “Mommy, they all slept over. You were right.”

Me: “I know honey, now go back to sleep. Please.”

7:37 a.m. Everybody’s up and hungry. I fix breakfast: french toast, eggs (cooked three different ways), cereal, juice, milk — something for everyone. Of course, I am wrong. Everyone has a special order. I become a glorified servant.

8:30 a.m. Breakfast is over. Everyone’s happy. Dishes are thrown in the sink. Girls are engaged in a tea party with water and cheerios, which spill all over the floor.

11 a.m. Parents arrive. None of the kids want to leave.

Noon: It’s just me and my girls. The house is quiet.

Noah says, “I did it, Mommy.”

“You sure did, honey,” I say.

Maya chimes in: “Can I have a sleepover party, too?”

Noa takes her hand. “Sure you can, Maya, don’t worry, I’ll organize it. We can do it next weekend. Right Mommy?”

The 10 Sleepover Commandments

Thou Shalt Not give kids chocolate after 9 p.m.

Thou Shalt remind all parents to send their child’s favorite stuffed animal to the party.

Thou Shalt read only happy ending books to kids before bed, and no scary movies during the course of the night.

Thou Shalt Not let kids know you’re nervous about letting them sleep out overnight — your confidence begets confidence.

Thou Shalt make sure all children go to the bathroom before getting into a sleeping bag.

Thou Shalt put no child on "the end" — sleep in a circular configuration (all heads facing inside).

Thou Shalt immediately remove "crying" child from premises and "chatterboxes" after "lights out" to avoid a domino reaction.

Thou Shalt not go it alone. Have a spouse, friend or relative help with the party.

Thou Shalt call all parents yourself when children are not in the room to let them know the kids are doing great (don’t mention you’re about to plotz).

Thou Shalt sleep well the night before the sleepover party — R.E.M. during "pajama night" is simply not an option. — LF

The Last-Minute Pajama Party Read More »

Is Indoor Play Good for Your Kids?

Debbie Friedman was visiting with two other moms at Serrania Park in Woodland Hills on a spring day in 2002 when she noticed their children were talking to a man walking his dog on the other side of the park fence. She went over to see what was happening.

“He said, ‘How old are you kids?’ They replied 4 and 5. He said, ‘Well, I’m 6. What are your names?’ It was a really creepy conversation,” she said.

Friedman said she thanked the man for showing the kids his dog and then sent the kids away.

“A lot of parents have fears of predators in the park watching them. It’s hard to keep an eye on two little ones…. You’re afraid they’re going to run off and someone’s going to snatch them,” she said.

Parents cite a variety of reasons for shying away from taking their children to local parks, from safety to excessively hot, cold or inclement weather to unsanitary conditions on playgrounds and in bathrooms.

When many Jewish parents do take their kids to play outdoors, the locales they pick are often the tonier parks frequented by other Jewish parents, sometimes requiring them to drive 10 or 20 miles. Favored parks include Beeman Park in Studio City, Roxbury Park in Beverly Hills and Serrania Park.

Galit Almog is a working mom from North Hollywood who makes time to take her child to Beeman Park or Balboa Park in Van Nuys, but she said it’s difficult to coordinate play dates with other parents because they also have busy schedules. As a result she said she’s been gravitating toward Gymboree Play & Music, an indoor “edutainment” center.

Structured indoor learn-and-play venues have become increasingly popular as children lead more regimented lives. Academic expectations and after-school activities chew up free time for outdoor exploring, which was once the mainstay of childhood. Experts agree that the amount of play time available to the average child has been dramatically reduced to an hour or less each day. Factor in that many households require both parents to work and it’s easy to understand why indoor play areas are gaining in popularity among young families.

“It’s more structured, you have a teacher, you have music, things to play with and a routine kids get used to,” Almog said.

Brentwood mom Natalie Bernstein is equally enamored with Gymboree after encountering unsanitary conditions at a neighborhood park.

“It’s cleaner, safer and there’s a greater choice of toys,” she said.

Indoor play can also address the needs of parents, said Adrian Becker, the owner of Gymboree Play & Music franchises in Sherman Oaks, Northridge and Calabasas for the last 23 years. Becker said parents — mostly women — come to Gymboree to play with their children, learn songs and develop new parenting skills they can use at home, but most of all they’re looking to make friends.

“I think parents are looking for community, and this is their way of connecting with like-minded people,” she said. “The neighborhoods aren’t what they used to be. It’s hard to make friends in your neighborhood now.”

Suzy Epstein, preschool director of Conservative synagogue B’nai Hayim in Sherman Oaks, said that parents want their children academically prepared, especially since many schools now teach kindergarten as if it were first grade.

“Kids already need to have so many skills that [parents] want children in a structured program, because they’re afraid they won’t be ready for kindergarten,” Epstein said. “It’s our job to prepare them, because that is what they have to face.”

But some experts in children’s recreation say that structuring play and confining it to temperature-controlled environments for safety and comfort reasons isn’t good for children’s development. They call for a balanced approach that includes unstructured outdoor play and caution that too much time spent indoors can have negative physical, social and psychological impacts.

“What’s happened is what [UC Davis play expert] Mark Francis calls ‘the childhood of imprisonment,'” said Randy White, CEO of White Hutchinson Leisure and Learning Group, a firm that designs children’s play and learning centers.

“It’s because of a total fear of public spaces and child abduction. Parents today are horrified. Some parents won’t even let their children play in their own backyard unsupervised. The ‘secured, sanitized spaces’ are what kids are restricted to today,” he said.

White believes this is stifling children.

“Most of these activities are very structured, and young children need play — spontaneous free play, not directed play,” he said.

One indoor venue offering an unstructured approach is Playsource, a playground set up in a Woodland Hills shopping center storefront on Ventura Boulevard. Children stow their shoes in cubbyholes, run across a carpeted floor and choose from jumping in an inflatable castle bounce, scaling a rock wall, climbing inside a spaceship or playing house in a scale model, among other activities. The only time limits placed on kids are the operating hours and their own stamina. Parents take a seat at picnic tables next to the play area and visit with each other, read or eat while the kids play.

Friedman started the playground six months ago as a way to work and spend more time with her own children.

“Parks aren’t relaxing; you’ve got to chase your kids,” Friedman said. “Here, you come in, pay your eight bucks, you pass the gate and sit down.”

Jessica Gottlieb said she drives her two kids to Playsource at least once a week from Sherman Oaks.

“My kids beg for it,” she said. “They aren’t going to get hit, they’re not going to get sand thrown in their eyes. They like that they can be more independent.”

Gottlieb said she tries to split time evenly between outdoor parks and venues like Playsource, but if it gets too hot “we do indoor exclusively.”

Parents who spoke with The Journal said lack of shade at parks adds to their reluctance to visit. Trees in parks have been purposefully cut back from playgrounds out of fear that a parent might sue the city if a falling branch were to strike a child, said Kevin Reagan, the Los Angeles Parks and Recreation Department’s western regional superintendent.

Reagan said that L.A. Parks and Recreation offers some indoor programs, like gymnastics and dance, as well as some indoor play areas in child-care centers, but there are no plans to cover playgrounds or move them indoors.

“There’s really nothing negative with parents choosing to take their kids to those other facilities,” he said. “We have a lot of people living here and there is no way that the city can provide enough recreational opportunities for every person that needs them.”

However, researchers are finding that spending too much time focused on indoor activities can have detrimental impacts on children’s physical and emotional health. They advise parents to take their children outside more and let them play in ways that they determine for themselves.

“There’s an enormous amount of research finally being done, which is documenting the importance of these types of experiences to children’s development,” White said.

Parents are doing their children a disservice by shielding them from hot or cold days, said Robert Bixler, associate professor of parks, recreation and tourism management at Clemson University in South Carolina.

Bixler warns that children will become accustomed to a narrow range of temperatures if they spend too much time in controlled environments. “Air conditioning and heating is wonderfully comfortable, but it ends up limiting the experiences we have,” he said.

Another physical impact on children being traced to an indoor lifestyle is the growing problem of myopia, or nearsightedness. According to research conducted in Japan and Singapore by the Australian National University in Canberra, as kids spend more time indoors, focusing on close objects such as books, TVs and GameBoys, their vision is affected. Another study found that myopia rates in Israel among observant 14- to 18-year-old boys, who focus tremendous amounts of time studying religious texts, is 80 percent; only 30 percent of students in Israel’s secular state schools exhibit such problems.

In addition to physical problems, emotional and social issues also come into play. Can guided play impact a child’s sense of independence? You bet, said Jan Tolan, a CSUN leisure studies and recreation professor who specializes in play and recreation therapy.

“Depriving children of the freedom to explore or learn on their own is hurtful and damaging in many ways,” she said.

Experts acknowledge that directed indoor play can positively impact on a child’s development. But they also believe that when parents de-emphasize the importance of spending time outdoors it reduces a child’s desire to explore the world and can potentially prejudice them against participating in future outdoor activities. “There’s a whole range of experiences people shut themselves off from due to comfort,” Bixler said.

Self-direction, decision making and problem solving can be learned outside of a park, but Tolan believes that these natural spaces encourage greater personal exploration, especially when done in a way that is entirely independent.

“Don’t neglect that free time when the child can interact with the environment in any way they want to,” Tolan said.

She said parents still need to supervise their children for safety reasons when they take them to a park, but from a distance.

“Step in only when it’s absolutely necessary, or when invited by the child,” she said.

Ultimately, recreation experts say parents should provide their children with a much-needed break in the structure of their busy days that will allow for the opportunity to independently explore the world and have fun.

“Balance is a guiding principal in anything. Yes, Gymboree has some things to offer that will help your child develop, but don’t deprive your child of the park experience as well,” Tolan said. “The park is a learning environment, too.”

Is Indoor Play Good for Your Kids? Read More »

Turmoil Could Bring Chance for Progress

Few doubt that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s disengagement plan has the potential to become a watershed event in Middle Eastern politics, and it already is causing major upheavals in both internal Israeli and Palestinian politics.

Sharon is being forced to widen his coalition to ensure a parliamentary and Cabinet majority for the plan, while on the Palestinian side, the impending Israeli pullout from the Gaza Strip has triggered an unprecedented challenge to Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat’s authority, as well as demands for a new style of governance.

It’s not yet clear what kind of coalition Sharon will form, nor how the violence and confusion among the Palestinians will play out. However, if Sharon is able to build a strong coalition and if a new, more pragmatic Palestinian government emerges from the present chaos, the current turmoil could be a prelude to a significant breakthrough in Israeli-Palestinian relations.

Sharon’s coalition negotiations, though, are going to be very tricky. Given the widespread opposition in his own Likud Party to the plan for Israeli disengagement from the Palestinians, Sharon needs to bring in the pro-disengagement Labor Party to ensure approval for his plan in the Cabinet and Knesset.

Ideally, Sharon would like to build a secular coalition with the center-right Likud, center-left Labor and centrist Shinui Party, which would command over 70 seats in the 120-member Knesset and see eye-to-eye on a disengagement agenda.

But Sharon’s Likud opponents argue that such a coalition would lead to policies too accommodating toward the Palestinians and to a dilution of the Likud’s conservative economic policy, which is pulling Israel out of its recession. Worse, they maintain, if Sharon forms a coalition with only Likud, Labor and Shinui, it will be perceived as too middle-class and Ashkenazi, and the Likud would lose at least half of its working-class Sephardi constituency in the next elections.

“We would drop from 40 to around 20 Knesset seats,” said Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom, who is considered something of a political savant in the Likud. But Shalom is also part of the problem. He’s concerned that if Labor joins the government, he might lose the Foreign Ministry to Labor leader Shimon Peres.

So far, Sharon is not making any promises, but he will be very wary of taking on Shalom in the Likud Central Committee. The foreign minister wields tremendous clout in that forum, which he intends to display at a huge rally scheduled July 25. Moreover, if he believes Sharon isn’t treating him right, Shalom is intimating that he’s ready to form an alliance with his old enemy, Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Such an alliance could seriously threaten Sharon’s hold on power in the party and the government, if the policy and personal differences lead to a showdown.

That’s why Sharon has been forced into opening coalition talks with two ultra-Orthodox parties, the Ashkenazi United Torah Judaism bloc and the Sephardi Shas Party. Together they have 16 seats in the Knesset and could replace Shinui — which now has 14 seats — to form a stable government with Likud and Labor. That would allow Sharon to be generous to Labor with Shinui’s portfolios. Peres could be given a special peace portfolio rather than the Foreign Ministry, and the Likud would be able to keep its working-class voters.

But that would be less than ideal for Sharon. The ultra-Orthodox parties, which tend to the right, could undermine the disengagement plan or threaten to undermine it unless they get concessions on religious issues or bigger budgets for religious institutions.

Sharon would like to see the ultra-Orthodox balanced by the staunchly secular Shinui — but each side refuses to sit in a coalition with the other.

To get more support for a coalition with Labor and Shinui, with or without the ultra-Orthodox, Sharon is warning Likud rebels that if they don’t support him, the inevitable result will be new elections, which could cost many of them their Knesset seats.

To solve the Shalom problem, pundits believe Sharon will leave him at the Foreign Ministry and offer Peres, in addition to the special portfolio, a “forum-of-two” mechanism, whereby the two elder statesmen would make key decisions together, regardless of whether Shinui, the Orthodox parties or both wind up in the coalition.

Sharon and Peres, though, take very different views of the current chaos on the Palestinian side. Sharon said the chaos highlights the fact that there is no Palestinian partner, and that Israel has no choice but to take unilateral action.

Peres said the chaos shows the danger of pulling out of the Gaza Strip without talking to Palestinians, who are in a position to maintain law and order, about a transition of power.

The indications on the ground are that Israel has virtually won the intifada: More and more Palestinians are questioning its rationale and acknowledging its failure to bring any political gains. Indeed, this sense of failure is the mainspring behind the growing criticism of Arafat.

The question now is whether Sharon, by building a new coalition and pushing his disengagement plan through, can turn Israel’s advantage on the ground into political coin.


Leslie Susser is the diplomatic correspondent for the Jerusalem Report.

Turmoil Could Bring Chance for Progress Read More »

World Briefs

Mckinney Wins House Primary

Former Rep. Cynthia McKinney won enough votes to avoid a runoff in her quest to return to Congress. McKinney, who was targeted by Jewish donors two years ago because she is seen as anti-Israel, won 51 percent of the vote in the Democratic primary Tuesday in Georgia’s 4th District, avoiding a runoff. Jewish donors who had backed McKinney’s opponent in 2002 did not contribute heavily to this year’s race, and several said they were waiting for a runoff to fund a challenger. Instead, McKinney will face Republican Catherine Davis in November in the heavily Democratic district.

AMIA Evidence a No-Show

Evidence believed to have surfaced in the deadly 1994 bombing of an Argentine Jewish center has not appeared. Argentine President Nestor Kirchner told Jewish leaders in a meeting Monday that tapes of telephone calls by one of the suspects just after the bombing had been found, Jewish leader Abraham Kaul said. But Kirchner later said he told the Jewish leaders that only receipts for the tapes had been found. Earlier this week, the 10th anniversary was marked of the July 18, 1994, bombing of the AMIA center, in which 85 people died.

Iran Nukes Loom

Israeli intelligence believes Iran will have nuclear weapons by 2007. The projection was made by intelligence chiefs in a report Wednesday to Cabinet ministers, Israel Radio said. Recent U.S. assessments have predicted Iran’s atomic program will produce nuclear arms by the end of the decade. The intelligence chiefs also warned that missiles held by Syria and Hezbollah posed a serious threat to Israel.

B’nai B’rith: Cut Off Presbyterians

B’nai B’rith called for an end to interfaith dialogue with the U.S. Presbyterian church. B’nai B’rith, a leader among U.S. Jewish groups in promoting interfaith dialogue, cited three decisions by the Presbyterians at their recent general assembly: to fund conversion missions targeting Jews; to divest holdings in Israel and call on others to follow suit; and to label Israel an apartheid state.

“For a dialogue to take place between two parties — interfaith or political — both sides must accept the right of the other to exist,” B’nai B’rith said in a statement Tuesday.

The church has an estimated 3 million members in the United States.

Sharon Threat Seen

As many as 200 far-right Israelis want to see Prime Minister Ariel Sharon dead, the head of Israel’s Shin Bet service said.

“There are between 150 and 200 Jews who actively wish for the death of the prime minister,” Avi Dichter was quoted as telling the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on Tuesday. Dichter said the biggest concentration of far-right vigilantes were to be found in the West Bank.

Settler leaders decried the briefing as an effort to discredit Israeli right-wingers opposed to Sharon’s plan to disengage from the Palestinians by withdrawing from the Gaza Strip and some of the West Bank. Recently, security around the prime minister was beefed up for fear he could be targeted for assassination.

Lantos Defends Anti-Semitism Review

Rep. Tom Lantos (D-San Mateo) is angry that the U.S. State Department opposes a plan for an annual review of global anti-Semitism. Lantos wrote Monday to Secretary of State Colin Powell suggesting that the level of hostility to Jews around the world warrants an amendment to the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act, currently under debate in the House of Representatives. The State Department says an anti-Semitism report would appear to afford special status to one group.

Chirac Denies Anti-Sharon Report

French President Jacques Chirac denied that he rescinded an invitation to Ariel Sharon to visit Paris. On Monday, it was reported that Chirac had sent a letter to Sharon after the Israeli prime minister called on French Jews to move to Israel because of anti-Semitism in France. Sharon’s statement incensed French officials. In a statement late Monday, Chirac’s office denied that a formal letter had been sent, saying instead that “a possible visit to Paris by the Israeli prime minister, for which no date had been fixed, will not be examined until the explanations demanded have been furnished.”

Palestinian Elections

The United States will help the Palestinians hold municipal elections this year. The elections would be phased, David Satterfield, the second-in-charge at the State Department’s Near East desk, told the Senate on Tuesday.

“We’re ready to assist the Palestinian Authority in preparations necessary to hold these free and fair elections,” Satterfield said. Until now, U.S. and Israeli officials have resisted new Palestinian elections, fearing they would validate the radical leadership behind the intifada. However, an Israeli official said the government approved the new proposal.

The attraction would be in allowing grass-roots moderates to create a base in the municipalities without handing P.A. President Yasser Arafat the victory he would likely get if there were national elections, the official said. Additionally, municipal elections would not require Israel to lift travel restrictions for campaigners.

Briefs courtesy Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

World Briefs Read More »