fbpx

April 4, 2002

What to Do About Arafat?

What to do about Yasser Arafat?

For months now, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has been convinced that the main problem in Israel’s relations with the Palestinians is the president of the Palestinian Authority, Yasser Arafat.

With virtually any other potential Palestinian leader, Sharon believes he would be able to work out a cease-fire and make progress towards peace. That’s why in January he defined Arafat as "irrelevant," and why in March he made up his mind to expel him from the Palestinian territories.

In fact, when Sharon walked into the Cabinet meeting in late March where Israel’s biggest military operation against Palestinian terror since the 1982 Lebanon War was approved, he was determined to get approval for Arafat’s expulsion as well.

But when Sharon raised the idea of exile, he was met by a chorus of dissent. Defense minister and Labor Party leader Benjamin Ben-Eliezer was furious that Sharon had not told him in advance that he planned to discuss the issue. Moreover, Ben-Eliezer said, he was adamantly opposed to expelling Arafat, and Labor would leave the government if the step was approved.

The heads of Israel’s various intelligence services backed Ben-Eliezer. The coordinator of government activities in the West Bank, Amos Gilead, a former high-ranking intelligence official, said an exiled Arafat would stir up serious trouble for Israel abroad, particularly in Jordan and Egypt.

The compromise between the Likud and Labor ministers was the bizarre decision to "isolate" Arafat in his Ramallah compound.

If the aim was to bypass Arafat or pressure him into a cease-fire, so far it has failed: All it has done is win worldwide sympathy for the beleaguered Palestinian Authority president.

The Cabinet clash reflects a deep dilemma in the Israeli government over what to do about Arafat. A minority school of thought, led by Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, holds that Arafat is the only Palestinian with the authority to push through a deal with Israel, and that the Israeli government has erred in trying to undermine his leadership.

The dominant school, to which both Sharon and Ben-Eliezer belong, maintains that Arafat has no intention of cutting a deal with Israel, and that a way must be found to bypass him. Where they differ is over how to do this.

The Sharon-Ben-Eliezer school was greatly strengthened by a series of damning intelligence reports that emerged late last year. For example, according to Israeli military intelligence, the day before Arafat announced a cease-fire in mid-December, he convened a group of Palestinian intellectuals at the Casablanca Hotel in Ramallah and detailed a long-term strategy for the destruction of Israel.

Israeli intelligence also reported that on numerous occasions, after condemning Palestinian suicide attacks on camera for the world media, Arafat celebrated the bombers’ "success" with his confidants, and made it plain that he would like to see more such attacks.

This shows, some intelligence officials argue, that Arafat is not interested in a deal with Israel under any circumstances, and that he has embarked on a fight to the death with the Jewish state.

Others don’t go quite that far: They say Arafat does want a peace deal, but only one imposed by the international community, so Arafat can say he was forced into it.

Sharon’s aides say it makes no difference: Either way, there is no point in talking to Arafat. Moreover, the aides say, the bottom line is that as long as Arafat is around, the Palestinians won’t do a thing to fight terror. They argue that the Tanzim, which has been carrying out most of the suicide bombings, is part of Arafat’s own Fatah organization, and would not act unless it had a "green light," whether explicit or implicit, from the president.

As long as Arafat gives the green light to terror, they say, Palestinian security chiefs like Mohammed Dahlan and Jibril Rajoub won’t dare lift a finger against it.

Sharon is no longer prepared to tolerate Arafat’s double game of condemning terror while encouraging the terrorists, or to allow the Palestinian leader to subvert every attempt to reach a cease-fire, including the latest mission by U.S. envoy Gen. Anthony Zinni in March.

The trouble is that Sharon doesn’t have very good options. He feels he can’t kill Arafat, because he promised the American administration that he wouldn’t. Sharon made the pledge in his first meeting as prime minister with President Bush in March 2000 — and, he says, the Americans have gotten him to repeat it in every high level meeting since.

In addition, killing Arafat could inflame not only the Palestinian territories but the entire Middle East, and turn world opinion squarely against Israel.

Sharon can’t isolate Arafat indefinitely, because world public opinion also isn’t likely to stand for that, and because he has promised to pull Israeli forces out of Palestinian towns and cities as soon as the current military operation is over.

He also can’t expel Arafat unless the Israeli Cabinet relents — though he publicly stated Tuesday that he would offer Arafat a "one-way ticket" out of Ramallah into exile. Arafat rejected the idea outright.

In an attempt to simply circumvent Arafat, Sharon began meetings in February with other Palestinian leaders, including Ahmed Karia, known as Abu Alaa, the speaker of the Palestinian legislative council; Mahmoud Abbas, known as Abu Mazen, Arafat’s deputy in the PLO; and Arafat’s confidant and economic adviser, Mohammed Rashid.

But those figures very quickly — and publicly — made clear that the meetings had been sanctioned by Arafat, and that they would report back to him. Sharon’s ploy did nothing to weaken Arafat’s hold on power.

Sharon’s problem is this: If Arafat is not killed, expelled or replaced by alternative Palestinian leaders, and if he emerges unscathed from his isolation in Ramallah, he would win an enormous prestige-enhancing victory, and Sharon would have to eat humble pie.

So now Sharon has starting telling visitors, like European Union official Javier Solana, that Solana can see the "isolated” Arafat on one condition: That he take the Palestinian leader with him into exile when he leaves the country.

If Solana or anyone else agrees, Sharon will worry about persuading the Cabinet.

What to Do About Arafat? Read More »

Stand With Us

“Tell the truth, don’t you think we need to create a wall between Israel and the Palestinians?”

“Be honest, don’t you think the United States should send in peacekeeping troops?”

I’ll tell the truth. I’m uncomfortable with American Jews, rising from spiritual slumber to suggest Israeli policy. Especially while their college-age children are in earshot. Especially when there is so much they could do besides yak.

In the last week, since the inception of the Passover suicide bombings, I have heard otherwise sophisticated Jews offer one outrageous scenario after another: outlandish military “solutions” include rushing to send in peacekeeping forces; the potential arrival of suicide bombers here in Los Angeles or New York; or suspected anti-Semitism among normally loving non-Jewish friends. Paranoia and paralysis are replacing thinking.

I understand why. It’s easier to have bellicose political opinions than to take action that will help Israel during this difficult time.

But the truth is, we in America have work to do besides such fancies. Support for Israel is the job of the Jewish community here. We have to make the case to the rest of the American community, and to do it in ways that link America’s own anti-terrorist battle with the defense of Israel’s democracy as clearly as possible.

My personal favorite action is support of the New Israel Fund (I’m on the board). Visit its Web site (www.newisraelfund.org) and see the wide range of civil- and human-rights programs the Fund helps, including SHATIL, which promotes Jewish-Arab equality and coexistence, and the Israel-U.S. Civil Liberties Law Program. War or no war, New Israel Fund helps Israeli Jews and Palestinians live together. These programs need your support, for they are the hope of the Israeli future.

I found myself this week on the Web site www.standwithus.com . The Web site falls in the category of propaganda, meaning one-sided presentation of facts, but it does it well. And in the absence of coherent political ideas, propaganda has a job to do.

Based in Los Angeles, standwithus.com, one of the co-sponsors of last Tuesday’s rally in front of the Federal Building on Wilshire Boulevard, is the closest thing I’ve found to a refresher course in Israeli policy regarding the Palestinian state.

Dissecting the Palestinian case, it argues that Arafat’s real interest is an end to the Jewish state. It’s convincing.

I spoke with one of the founders of standwithus.com. She asked for anonymity, given what she said was the potential for physical threat in this dangerous moment.

“The Palestinian leadership has poisoned its people about terrorism,” said the woman we’ll call Ruth. “They’re suffering.”

Ruth said standwithus.com is building a registry of those who want e-mail updates about what is happening in Israel. The site has an action page, telling people how to protest media treatment of Israel. Last month, the organization took aim at TV personality Geraldo Rivera:

“He calls himself a Zionist. He weaves his reports with the thread of caring and loyalty…. He assumes the right to consistently bash Israel through the Arab spin,” the Web site claimed, urging calls and petitions to Fox network.

“Israel stands alone,” said Ruth, who was active in the plight of Soviet Jewry and the 1967 Israeli war. “We want to build a coalition bigger than just the Jewish community. The world is pretty quiet.”

What else can be done? Read Tom Friedman and William Safire in The New York Times. Also check out the Jerusalem Report and Jerusalem Post (both fine examples of an Israeli free press). Stay away from TV news until you understand the politics of Egypt and Jordan, Morocco and Saudi Arabia. Ignore “Hardball” until you can name all the past secretaries of state.

Stand With Us Read More »

Anti-Semitism Hits France

A fresh outburst of anti-Semitic violence throughout France has Jewish leaders fearing the return of Kristallnacht.

The reference to the horrors of Nazi Germany, issued by French Jewish leader Jean Kahn, hit the French dailies, as police in Marseille were still investigating a fire that reduced a synagogue to ashes.

The incident punctuated a weekend of anti-Jewish aggression that included attacks on synagogues in Lyon and Strasbourg and a shooting at a kosher butcher shop near the southwestern city of Toulouse in which no one was injured.

In addition, a French Jewish couple was injured in a weekend attack in the southern part of the country.

The latest violence apparently was sparked by indignation aroused by pro-Palestinian demonstrations in France, Germany and Greece on Saturday.

Lyon and Strasbourg witnessed the largest of these protests, with turnouts estimated at 6,000 and 3,000, respectively, while police reported smaller showings in Toulouse and Marseille.

The first of the attacks took place Saturday morning before the protest in Lyon. According to an eyewitness, approximately 15 hooded men drove a car through the large wooden doors of a synagogue in the Jewish neighborhood of La Duchere and then set it on fire.

The other incidents occurred just hours after demonstrations, in which protesters carried banners that read "We are all Palestinians," "Sharon Assassin" and "Stop the Massacre of Palestinians."

In Toulouse, a man opened fire at a closed kosher butcher shop on Saturday evening, causing damage to the building’s facade. Hours later, vandals set fire to the doors of a synagogue in the eastern French city of Strasbourg, home to one of France’s largest and oldest communities of Ashkenazi Jews.

Firemen were able to extinguish the fires in Lyon and Strasbourg before they spread, but the arson in Marseilles completely leveled the 4,800-square-foot Or Aviv synagogue.

Reactions in the Jewish community ranged from hurt to outrage, but nobody seemed very surprised.

Commenting on the Toulouse attack, Rabbi David Layani said: "This new act comes after hundreds of others that have struck the French Jewish community in the last 18 months, following events in the Middle East which make the situation here extremely tense."

In Strasbourg, Jewish officials were quick to blame demonstrators for stirring up anti-Semitic hatred.

In the midst of a heated presidential election race, the two front-runners, President Jacques Chirac and Prime Minister Lionel Jospin, were quick to denounce the surge of anti-Jewish aggression.

Jospin said he was "revolted" by these "cowardly and absurd" acts.

Chirac, who has enraged Jewish leaders in the past by denying the problem of French anti-Semitism, condemned "with the utmost severity the brutal, hateful and unacceptable attack."

"Those responsible should be prosecuted and severely punished," he told the media.

Anti-Semitism has become an epidemic in neighborhoods where Jews and Arabs live side by side. While many Jews are still digesting the news of this latest outbreak, the initial responses of Jewish leaders indicate a shift in their perception of the problem.

Partly as a result of the connection between the pro-Arafat demonstrations and the latest anti-Semitic violence, French Jews appear more inclined to view these incidents as coordinated acts of terrorism than the irrational anger of Arab teens.

Anti-Semitism Hits France Read More »

Arafat’s Choice

Last week, as a Palestinian terrorist murdered 22 Israelis sitting down to their Passover seder, the Al Aqsa Martyr’s Brigade became the first group affiliated with Yasser Arafat’s Fatah movement to be added to the U.S. list of Foreign Terrorist Organization since the United States normalized relations with the Palestinian Liberation Organization after the signing of the Oslo accords in 1993.

Composed of Arafat loyalists, funded by Fatah through the Tanzim militias, and assisted in coordination of their attacks by members of Arafat’s Force 17 security services, the Al Aqsa Martyr’s Brigade has dramatically outpaced Islamic extremist organizations like Hamas and Islamic Jihad in attacks on Israelis. Since the beginning of the year, reports indicate that close to 70 Israelis have been murdered, and more than 500 have been wounded in terrorist attacks attributed to the Al Aqsa Martyr’s Brigade alone.

The designation was eagerly anticipated in Congress, where I recently joined Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Miami) in sending a letter signed by over 235 U.S. representatives urging President Bush to place the Al Aqsa Martyr’s Brigade, along with the Tanzim and Force 17, on the list. We applaud this move as a serious indictment of Arafat for the free rein he has given terrorist groups and as a warrant for the Bush administration’s close examination of the extent to which high level Palestinian officials are involved in planning and financing attacks. Unless Arafat makes a decisive choice to isolate and eliminate the Al Aqsa Martyr’s Brigade’s operations, he and his entire organization must be viewed as terrorists, and as such should be subject to severe diplomatic and financial sanctions.

Unfortunately, the Palestinian leadership’s continued refusal to implement a U.S. brokered cease-fire demonstrates that Arafat is unwilling to take even the most basic steps for security cooperation. Even as Gen. Anthony Zinni has attempted to facilitate a meeting between Vice President Cheney and Arafat by arranging United States-brokered talks between Israeli and Palestinian security forces, Al Aqsa Martyr’s Brigade suicide bombers have struck central Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.

This comes only three months after it was revealed that senior Palestinian officials were arranging the Karine-A shipment of arms at the same time they negotiated the Tenet plan and approved the Mitchell report. The shipment, which contained Iranian-supplied Kassam rockets and at least 2,200 kilograms of the TNT and C-4 explosives used in suicide attacks, was another flagrant display of Arafat’s lack of credibility in dealing with Israel and the United States.

Until Arafat abandons his strategy of relying on terrorist attacks to put pressure on Israel, he is incapable of sincerely negotiating a cease-fire. Until he stops supporting, sustaining and supplying terrorist factions, he will continue to undermine U.S. efforts to restore stability in the region. And, until he takes action to confiscate the terrorist weapons, close down bomb-making labs, and arrest the militants training to become suicide attackers, he leaves Israel with no choice but to take all measures necessary to defend its citizens. It was right for Cheney not to meet with him. It is appropriate for the United States to consider him not just an obstacle, but an opponent of our efforts for peace and our war against terrorism.

Arafat’s Choice Read More »

World Briefs

State Dept. Issues Warning, Recall

The State Department Tuesday warned U.S. citizens to defer travel to Israel, the West Bank and Gaza. “Ongoing violence has caused numerous civilian deaths and injuries, including to some American tourists,” the department advisory said. “As a result of the ongoing violence, the Department of State has authorized the voluntary departure from Jerusalem of U.S. Consulate dependents.” Jewish leaders, while understanding the need to protect U.S. citizens abroad, expressed unhappiness with a move that could scare even more tourists away.

Papers Prove P.A. Link to Terror

Documents found in Yasser Arafat’s Ramallah headquarters show how closely the Palestinian Authority is tied to terrorism, Israeli officials charge. Among the documents found by the Israel Defense Force after seizing the Ramallah compound last Friday are requests from the Al-Aksa Brigades, the military wing of Arafat’s Fatah movement, for money to finance its terror attacks. The documents were found in the office of the Palestinian Authority’s chief financial officer, Fouad Shoubaki, one of the key figures in the Karine A arms smuggling boat intercepted by Israel in January. The documents prove that Shoubaki continued to do “business as usual,” even after his involvement in the smuggling attempt was discovered and Arafat pledged to investigate him, Israeli officials charged. Palestinians say the documents are forgeries.

Israeli officials also said that Israeli troops found stashes of counterfeit shekels and dollars, as well as plates to print money, in Arafat’s Ramallah headquarters. According to Justice Minister Meir Sheetrit, the Palestinian Authority president is responsible for printing several million dollars and shekels in fake money, which could have been used to undermine Israel’s already shaky economy, or to pay Palestinian terrorists operating in Israel, Israeli officials said.

U.S. Jews Attacked in Berlin

Several men attacked two Orthodox Jews in Berlin. German police said the men — who were described as having a Middle Eastern appearance — asked if the two Americans were Jews before pushing them to the ground on Sunday night. They suffered minor injuries. The attack came after German officials said they would increase security at Jewish sites following attacks on Jewish sites in Belgium and France, and following pressure from German Jewish leaders.

Meanwhile, The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations called on the leaders of France, Belgium and other countries in which there have been attacks against Jewish institutions “to act decisively to capture those responsible.” They issued a statement Tuesday saying, “These assaults have been tolerated far too long and led to the escalation in both the seriousness and frequency of the attacks.”

Activist’s Family Threatened

The Brooklyn family of a Jewish activist who supports Yasser Arafat says it is getting death threats. The family of Adam Shapiro says it has gotten calls from people calling him a traitor, the “Jewish Taliban” and threatening to kill him and his family. Shapiro, who was in Arafat’s Ramallah headquarters last Friday when it was taken over by Israeli forces, has been an outspoken member of a pro-Palestinian group voicing sympathy for the Palestinian Authority president.

Clinton Regrets Rich Pardon

Former President Bill Clinton said he regrets pardoning billionaire financier Marc Rich. Clintontold Newsweek magazine that he would not grant the pardon again “just for the politics.” Rich fled the United States to Switzerland in 1983 after he had been indicted on 51 counts of tax evasion, racketeering and violating trade sanctions with Iraq. His attorneys launched a major initiative on his behalf, courting Israeli and American Jewish activists to impress Clinton with Rich’s philanthropic activities. “It was terrible politics,” Clinton said of the pardon. “It wasn’t worth the damage to my reputation. But that doesn’t mean the attacks were true.”

Durban Anti-Semitism Condemned

The South African government condemned the anti-Semitism at last summer’s anti-racism conference as “disgraceful.” The nongovernmental conference was held in Durban last August, just before an official U.N. conference against racism. Jewish participants at the conference described the anti-Semitism there as the worst seen in public since the 1930s. Aziz Pahad, South Africa’s deputy minister for foreign affairs, said at the recent annual conference of the South African Zionist Federation in Johannesburg that Muslim activists had taken over the Durban conference and turned it into an anti-Semitic event, according to the Israeli daily Ha’aretz.

11 Killed for Helping Israel

Palestinian gunmen killed 11 men suspected of helping Israel. Two masked Palestinian gunmen entered an intelligence building in the West Bank city of Tulkarm on Monday and killed eight men awaiting trial on charges of helping Israeli security forces, according to Palestinian witnesses. Three other Palestinians also accused of helping Israel were found shot dead elsewhere in the West Bank.

Briefs courtesy Jewish Telegraphic Agency

World Briefs Read More »

Will the Real Jew Please Stand Up?

I thought I could tell the difference between Jews and gentiles, and not just by using Lenny Bruce’s criteria: chocolate is Jewish and fudge is goyish.

Granted, people are individuals — and particularly post-Sept. 11, stereotyping seems gauche if not utterly narrow-minded — but still, I believed Jews and gentiles operate on intrinsically different levels.

Consider: "I hate my family." My friend Linda Rothstein says this means: "My family calls 10 times a day and drives me nuts, but I love them more than life itself." My friend Ashley Edwards’ interpretation? "We have no contact, and my trust fund’s been frozen."

The only gentile I dated seriously was a blond actor with chiseled cheekbones, who, in deference to me — his ultraneurotic, petite, curly haired girlfriend — removed the cross hanging above his childhood bed when we visited his parents in Wisconsin for "the holidays." But after his mother welcomed me downstairs Christmas morning with, "Don’t you think dear that our tree looks far lovelier than the stunted bush you people have?" — propelling me into a shame-spiral rivaling that of Charlie Brown in his Christmas special — I decided to date only Jews.

Then I met a fabulous one. Or so I thought.

"You have shmutz on your punim," I heard someone say while waiting for the restroom at Cantor’s one Saturday night. When I looked up, a sexy, curly haired stranger lifted his index finger to my cheek, wiped off a piece of black rye, checked my face for more shmutz and finally declared, "Beautiful." His name: Noah. His doppelganger: Ben Stiller. His affect: Woody Allen.

"So, Lorela," Noah began on the phone the next morning. The only people who ever called me Lorela were my great-aunts with hair on their chins and their bubelah bridge partners. "Wanna grab some lunch?"

Chatting at Nathan’s Famous on Pico, we laughed at our addiction to kosher hot dogs, despite our craving for cheeseburgers. We played Jewish geography and found connections ranging from our shrinks in Santa Monica to the Goldbergs on the Upper West Side in Manhattan. We gesticulated so wildly that our hands collided in midair. .

"Oy vey!" Noah exclaimed back at my duplex, eyeing the plugged sink that looked like a large petri dish from a high school science experiment.

"Do you think it’s the pipes or that I need a new disposal?" I asked, to which he gave me the frightened look of a "Jeopardy" contestant blindsided by a difficult question in the final round. "Don’t worry," I teased, "Jewish guys never know how to fix anything."

"Jewish?" he replied. "I’m not Jewish."

I tilted my head questioningly, certain I’d misheard him. Or misunderstood. Maybe, I thought, he means he’s "not religious." Or that by some technicality — say, his mother isn’t Jewish — he was actually half-Jewish. After all, he ate pumpernickel bagels for breakfast each morning and knew more Yiddish than I did. He must be joking, right?

Wrong. Turned out he had "a lot of Jewish friends" and "sort of adopted the culture." From then on, I couldn’t shake the feeling that Noah was speaking the equivalent of Jewish ebonics, as if I’d never really understand his universe of "mummy" and "father" and bacon sandwiches with mayonnaise on crustless Wonder Bread were he to speak in his native tongue. And truth be told, I wouldn’t.

"You’re Jewish, right?" I asked Michael — the guy I met at a dinner party of a Pasadena preppy straight from pages of a Ralph Lauren catalogue — 10 minutes into our first date. Wary of goyim posing as Jews, I wanted to be sure up front.

Michael was Jewish, all right, but the kind who went to Exeter, had horses and looked more Ben Affleck than Ben Stiller. He rowed crew and "summered" in the Hamptons instead of on Fire Island or Maui.

He invited me to his home not for Chanukah, but for "the holidays," tree and all. When we played Jewish geography, he knew the Cartwrights not the Cohens, the Sanfords not the Sheinbergs. He bought 7-Up instead of Snapple, watched "Six Feet Under" instead of "The Sopranos."

Sleeping late one Sunday morning, he joked, "Oh, no, we’re supposed to be in church!" — not a reference that would have occurred to any Jew I knew. "You have a sleeper on your face," he continued, pointing to his own right eye so that I could remove the shmutz myself. I’d never seen anything like it: did he have a mutation on the gene that programs all Jews to invasively wipe the shmutz off other people’s faces, usually with their own saliva?

One night, when Michael had the remote control, Jon Stewart came on, and Michael flipped right by. "Wait!" I practically screamed. "Don’t you like Jon Stewart"?

"He’s very, uh, New York," Michael shrugged. New York? Wasn’t that goyim code for Jewish?

Still, Michael insisted he was Jewish, and I gave him the benefit of the doubt, even if he’d never been to a single therapy session or owned a book by Philip Roth. But when, during our first fight, he uttered a phrase straight from the WASP-fest flick "Ordinary People" — "I don’t want to discuss it" — I knew we could never work out.

Jews always want to discuss it. We’re loud, analytical, emotional talkers. We long to engage in Alan Dershowitz-style verbal sparring, devolving into the dissonant mayhem of the dinner tables at which we grew up.

Nostalgically, I remembered my first argument with Noah: "You’re just like your mother!" "But you haven’t even met my mother yet!" "I can tell what she’s like already" "Putz!" "Princess!" Then we stuck our tongues out at each other and laughed like hyenas. End of argument.

Michael, on the other hand, had chosen the Christian credo of "turn the other cheek" — or, to us Jews hip to psychological jargon, "suppression." I tried cheering him up with a chopstick full of my cashew chicken, but he looked at it as though it were kryptonite. I’d forgotten that Michael didn’t like to share food, even at a Chinese restaurant.

"You say you’re Jewish?" I asked, waving a dumpling in exasperation.

"I don’t want to discuss it," Michael repeated. At that point, neither did I.

Thing is, I was looking to date a regular ol’ Jew, not a faux Jew or a self-loathing Jew. I was tired of people in Los Angeles pretending to be something they’re not: yuppies posing as bohemians, waiters posing as actors, gentiles posing as Jews, Jews posing as gentiles. Had the Marx Brothers come back from the dead for one last film?

Fortunately, a few weeks later, I met Daniel, as real a Jew as the Marlboro man was male. Sure, he may be assimilated, but he always wipes the shmutz off my face. Now, if only I can convince him to listen to my Richard Belzer CDs.

Will the Real Jew Please Stand Up? Read More »

Silence and Rage

In a parsha that features spectacular displays of sound and light, the most dramatic moment is actually the quietest one. In fact, it sometimes feels like the opening chapter’s tumult and noise only serves to draw us even deeper into the second chapter’s thunderclap of silence.

The parsha opens with the pomp and ceremony attending the formal inauguration of the tabernacle in the desert. We see Aaron ministering in the gleaming garments of the high priesthood. We see the Divine fire descend from heaven, signaling acceptance of the initial offerings, and we hear the people shout and exclaim in wonder. In a flash, though, celebration turns to horror. Two of Aaron’s sons bring forth an unauthorized incense offering, prompting a second fire to tumble down from heaven, killing them on the spot. Moshe is the first to react to the sudden carnage, turning to his brother Aaron with the following somewhat enigmatic words: "Of this God spoke when He said, ‘Through My close ones shall I be sanctified.’"

Aaron, on the other hand, says nothing. And the language of the text strongly suggests that Aaron’s "nothing" is not merely an absence of response. It is a purposeful "nothing." Aaron makes a conscious decision to be silent. Silence is his rejoinder to Moshe, and his declarative statement before God.

What is the meaning of Aaron’s silence? Some have suggested Aaron is indicating to Moshe that he regards his personal sorrow to be secondary to the needs of the nation. On this monumental day, the people need to see their high priest composed and undeterred in his devotional service. If he were to cry out, panic and fear would quickly spread throughout the camp. According to this interpretation, Aaron’s silence is a deliberate act of suppression of self for the benefit of the many.

But the words that Aaron eventually does speak lead us to think differently. As Moshe had requested, Aaron continues with the service of the day even after the calamity. But at the end of the day, Moshe discovers that Aaron has not eaten the high priest’s portion of the sin offering. Instead, Aaron had burned it in fire. When confronted by Moshe, Aaron finally breaks his silence. "Today my sons brought their offerings before God, and this is what has befallen me. Shall I eat the sin offering today? Would that be pleasing in the eyes of God?"

Aaron is a model for the subsequent development of Jewish tradition. On the day that a loved one has died, the surviving family members are exempt from the performance of mitzvot. Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik has written that they are entitled to act out against God. Aaron’s silence and Aaron’s anger are codified into normative Jewish practice. As devoted children of God, who live by God’s law and worship in His holy places, we are of right to express ourselves when we feel He has failed us.

Virtually every day we are as those who have lost a family member that day. We struggle as we both plead with God to save His people, and can’t mistake the growing feeling of dismay at our God who seems to be sitting by silently as we are slaughtered. Aaron and his anguish are our constant companions.

I pray that by the time that you are reading these words, we will have begun to move from the anguish of Aaron to the exultation of national redemption that the Jews in Netanya were commemorating during a Passover seder. Next year in Jerusalem.

Silence and Rage Read More »

Exploiting the Holocaust

Cheap Trips to Auschwitz

If you want to go to Auschwitz on the cheap, all you have to endure is a sales pitch.

A Czech company has come under fire for offering inexpensive daytrips to the site of a former concentration camp in order to sell health equipment.

Aesculab Reisen has been trying to sell $350 “oxygen biogenerators” and health mattresses to tourists who are bused from the Czech Republic to Auschwitz in Poland.

Daytrippers are shown a presentation of the health equipment after “a tasty breakfast” and “a fantastic lunch” on the way to the camp. The several-hundred-mile round trip costs the equivalent of $4.

The story surfaced after a Czech man, who is not Jewish, took exception to an advertising leaflet distributed by the company in his hometown of Hlucin.

“I found a stack of leaflets under the mailbox of our apartment block, and I was so angry that I took them all away and destroyed them,” Tomas Blazka said. “I don’t agree with the idea of commercializing the Holocaust.”

Aesculab Reisen, which launched its first trip last week, said it had no plans to drop the excursions.

Lucie Cervenkova, a sales manager for the company, said the firm would continue the trips on a regular basis as long as there is demand.

Tomas Jelinek, the chairman of Prague’s Jewish community, said he did not want to condemn the company without establishing the nature of its trips.

“I support the idea of Czech people going to visit Auschwitz, but I would attack any company strongly if it arranged a tour that was not tasteful or professionally handled with proper lectures and museum visits,” he said. — Magnus Bennett, Jewish Telegraphic Agency

Labor Camp Used in Porn Film

Czech Jewish leaders are shocked about reports that the former wartime transit camp of Terezin is being used to shoot scenes for a pornographic film.

The Czech tabloid Super reported last week that the film, starring top Czech porn star Robert Rosenberg, is set at the end of World War II and will tell the story of how women at the camp were raped by Nazis.

The paper, which printed the story with a collage of a semi-naked woman posing in front of a picture of Terezin, said the film’s working title is “How It Was.”

Rosenberg, 27, was quoted in Super as saying that the main plot will revolve around Terezin, but there will be no erotic scenes shot inside the former camp, which was also known as Theresienstadt.

“Terezin will not have anything to do with erotica; we don’t want to treat the victims of the war with disrespect,” he told the newspaper.

But Jan Munk, director of the Terezin Memorial, said he was outraged by the idea that Terezin could be used as a backdrop for a porn film, but there may be a problem in taking the filmmakers to court.

“We will be looking into the legal position, but it may be very difficult to make a case if they are just using pictures of Terezin and mixing them into the film,” he said.

Newsstands in the town of Terezin were said to be busy, as people lined up to read the story. The overwhelming reaction was one of disgust.

Rosenberg was unavailable for comment Sunday, but Ruzena Cechova, the mayor of Terezin, has said she plans to contact the police to ascertain whether any laws have been broken. — Magnus Bennett, Jewish Telegraphic Agency

Exploiting the Holocaust Read More »

Jew Night

Once a year, Highland Park is converted into Chai-land Park for what might be the most gone-amok of all Jewish celebrations: “Jew Night.”

Michael Perrick created a post-modern Borscht Belt bash that has become a local tradition for Jew and non-Jew alike.

“Every year, people ask me, ‘So when is ‘Jew Night?'” says the 34-year-old Silver Lake artist.

“Jew Night” is all about wacked-out Jewish kitsch: the gyrating Jelvis (“The Jewish Elvis”); the Whirling Hors-Dervishes klezmer band; the Sinai Puppets; a Whack-a-Mohel game; bagel flinging; and even a Miss JAP contest where contestants are judged on hair, nails and whining. The biggest draw: “Strip Dreydel.” The Fourth Annual shtickfest will be hosted by Perrick’s alter-kacker alter ego, Sye Goldstein.

“I like how he treats it so playfully,” says Kim Cooper, who assists Perrick. “He’s very serious about celebrating Jewishness, but he doesn’t want to be rigid.”

“I’m a firm believer in the idea of bringing stereotypes out so it becomes something you can laugh at,” Perrick says, “and then it loses its power.”

Despite his unorthodox appearance, Perrick has always been closely connected to Judaism. “I grew up watching concentration camp footage and war films, and it scared the crap out of me,” says Perrick, whose father was “obsessed” with the Holocaust. Through Jew Night, Perrick hopes to “celebrate the Jew in everyone.” All inhibitions go out the window, save for one: “Negativity is not allowed.”

Perrick’s mission is to make everybody feel comfortable with Jewish culture by not taking it too seriously.

“If you aren’t a Jew when you come in,” Perrick says, “you will be when you leave.”

Jew Night takes place April 6 at 9 p.m. at Mr. T’s Bowl, 5621 1/2 Figueroa (at Avenue 57), Highland Park. Admission: $10 (21+ only). For information, call (323) 692-3136 or visit www.jewnight.com . — Michael Aushenker, Staff Writer

Jew Night Read More »

New UCLA Hillel

Cars slow and heads turn as curious UCLA students drive past 574 Hilgard Ave. The construction site will be the new home of the UCLA Hillel building, scheduled to open this fall. "I hope that it really will be a home, just like the Jewish students at UCLA are a family," said Allon Rafael, student co-chair of UCLA Hillel.

The 22,000-square-foot building has been a long-awaited gift to Jewish students at UCLA, as well as the Hillel staff. It will ultimately replace the 25-year-old dilapidated building that is currently known as Hillel. "It’s not a comfortable place where we are now. There’s no place to relax…. It’s cold, and there’s one big multipurpose room. It doesn’t have a comfortable feel," Rafael said.

However, Rafael and others will never have to be concerned about comfort and space at Hillel again, thanks to a naming gift from Lee and Irving Kalsman and founding donors Edgar Bronfman, Edie and Lew Wasserman, Steven Spielberg and the Samueli Foundation.

The center will consist of three stories, each with a special feel and function. Near the entrance, a cafe, sponsored by The Coffee Bean, will serve hot and cold drinks and snacks daily. The coffeehouse will function as a student hangout, offering live music and Saturday night shows. "You really get a sense that this is for the students," Associate Director Carol Bar-Or said.

A complete kosher kitchen on the second floor will serve at least two meals daily and allow many "Orthodox students to look at UCLA, perhaps for the first time," Bar-Or noted. A large board room for student and volunteer board meetings, study rooms, a computer center and administrative offices will also be on the second floor.

On floor three, perhaps the most aesthetically beautiful floor of the building, will be a sanctuary, auditorium and theater surrounded by a wall of glass. Each venue can be used individually, or all three can be transformed into one large area, with seating for 300 to 350 people.

It is apparent, even in these intermediate stages, that the building was designed with the intention of creating a home away from home for Jewish students. "A Judaic theme will be evident from the moment you walk in until you leave," Bar-Or said.

Israeli artist David Moss created this theme by designing an original artistic concept of glass blocks, filled with earth from various countries, placed intermittently along the floor of the entry hallway; the implication being to replicate the journey of the Jewish people. The hallway will ultimately lead to an outdoor meditation garden designed in the shape of the state of Israel. The entire front façade of the building will be constructed of Jerusalem stone.

Student co-chair Nicole Guzik believes that the new Hillel building will be a draw for many students who might not have been previously involved in Hillel. "The location is really key. I think that the Greek students will take advantage of the new building because it is so close to sorority row — you have to pass by it." However, Guzik is also concerned that the elaborate building might give students the wrong message. "I want students to remember that Hillel is very student-initiated. It is not a pool of monetary resources…. Money talks, but it doesn’t talk when it comes to commitment. It still takes student commitment."

Leading by example, Guzik and Rafael have sat in on numerous board meetings and spoken at fundraisers for the building. They have found that contributors have taken their ideas to heart and that the final result will really be a student building. "They didn’t have to ask us for our input, and we really appreciate that," Guzik said.

In addition to a student building, Bar-Or hopes that the new Hillel will be a "major center for the Westside Jewish community." This will be a significant change, since Hillel’s previous accommodations allowed the organization to host community programs only in other larger, more comfortable venues. However, Rafael believes that "inviting somebody into your own home has much stronger implications." The center will finally enable Hillel to do so, offering a setting worthy of the impressive speakers and top-notch performers that regularly pass through the gates of UCLA. Already scheduled to launch Hillel’s opening are New York Times correspondent Tom Friedman and Israeli singer Chava Alberstein. "The new building is going to help us offer Judaism better," Rafael said.

New UCLA Hillel Read More »