fbpx

May 17, 2001

Through Jewish Eyes

“Anne Frank and Me” by Cherie Bennett and Jeff Gottesfeld (G.P. Putnam’s Sons, $18.99)

Authors Cherie Bennett and Jeff Gottesfeld remember the exact moment they conceived the idea for their latest book, “Anne Frank and Me.” The husband-and-wife writing team had just watched an episode of “60 Minutes” featuring Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel. Bennett found herself as disturbed by the man’s pleasant demeanor as his revisionist history. “You know, if you’re a gentile teenager and you see a skinhead with a swastika carved into his forehead, you scoff,” Bennett said. “But this jerk? He looks like someone’s uncle. If you didn’t know better, you could get sucked in.”

A playwright and author of young-adult fiction, Bennett had found her next project — making life under Nazi occupation a historical experience with relevance to modern teens. With Gottesfeld working on research and editing, they created the theatrical version of “Anne Frank and Me,” which ran off-Broadway in 1996 with Bennett directing. Together, Bennett and Gottesfeld have adapted the stage version into a novel.

The story follows Nicole Burns, a suburban 10th-grader much more concerned with her current crush than with her class assignment to read Anne Frank’s ” The Diary of a Young Girl.” Classmates and parents raise doubts that the Holocaust ever happened. While surfing the Internet, Nicole comes across an official-looking Web site which seems to prove this denial.

But soon after her Internet experience, Nicole is magically transported to Nazi-occupied Paris. She is forced to live a strange new life as a Jewish girl, enduring anti-Semitism and the ever-greater brutality of Nazi France. Hours before the Allies liberate Paris, Nicole is deported and finds herself in a cattle car bound for a concentration camp, where she comes face to face with Anne Frank.

Rather than write another book dealing with the horrors of the camps (“Camp survivors have written those stories better than we ever could,” Gottesfeld said), Bennett and Gottesfeld shine a new light on the Holocaust through the eyes of a non-Jewish American teen. Extensively researched, “Anne Frank and Me” fights the damaging fiction of Holocaust deniers with engaging fiction for young adults.

Through Jewish Eyes Read More »

Westside Renewal

Believe in the Exodus story or not, believe in the Oslo peace process or not, but you have to believe in Jewish Community Centers.

Synagogues are mostly directed at our minds and souls, but JCCs are the flesh-and-blood of Jewish life. They are where we meet, sweat, play, talk and often learn. They are neither Orthodox nor Reform; the intermarried do laps alongside the in-married; the unrepentant Bushie folk dances with the unrepentant Naderite; knitted-kippah yeshiva boys share basketball courts (but not court times) with intramural day-school teams; the toddlers of lesbian couples wait in the same pick-up line as the toddlers of … you get the idea. How many of our Jewish institutions have as their mission statement: "We welcome all Jews," and then fling wide their doors regardless of income, age, marital status, religious observance or sexual orientation? I believe in JCCs.

To discover great JCC success stories, you might want to hop a plane to New Orleans, La. Or Newton Center, Mass. Or Owings Mills, Md. In those cities and others, local Jewish communities have funded and built state-of-the-art facilities, linked them to innovative programs, and have become truly the centers of vibrant Jewish life.

Actually, you needn’t leave Los Angeles at all. The Bernard Milken Jewish Community Campus of the West Hills JCC, with its $4.5-million Ferne Milken Youth & Sports Complex is a fine example of what happens when a community gets behind its JCC.

It’s taken a while for that to happen on the Westside, but finally, it has. On May 10, a few dozen people gathered in the auditorium of the center, located near Olympic and San Vicente, to kick off a $7-million capital campaign for what its supporters call "The J."

For a couple of decades now, the building that houses the J has been in dire need of a makeover. As the Jewish community moved to the "new" Westside of Beverly Hills and Santa Monica, and into the Valley and beyond, the circa-1954 structure that at one time defined L.A. Jewish life deteriorated.

But a group of longtime J supporters, joined by an influx of young professionals, has begun turning the J around. They retained architect Michael Lehrer to revamp the campus’ exterior and interior spaces. At the kickoff, Lehrer walked me around a model of what’s in store.

"This building has great bones," he enthused. "A lot of my job was just getting the junk out." Indeed, under Lehrer’s deft hand, the original postwar design of Sid Eishenstadt resurfaces. The new J will share the same basic lines, but Lehrer has put in a huge central skylight, pulled out walls to ensure an open flow, added a black box theater, a health-club quality gym, a Starbucks-like cafe, sauna and steam rooms (separated by sex — but hey, nothing’s perfect) and an enclosed postmodern funhouse for children. He has completely reconfigured the outdoor plaza areas to create a grand entrance and numerous esplanade-type open spaces, along with an outdoor running track and rooftop reception area. And the new design, as opposed to the present building, will be handicap-accessible.

The J has already raised about $2 million of the $7 million needed for the new project, with large donations coming from the foundations of Harry and Jeanette Weinberg; S. Mark Taper; the Max and Pauline Zimmer Family; and the J’s neighbor, Midway Hospital, and its parent company, the Tenet Healthcare Foundation. The new J will be an impressive and contemporary new L.A. landmark, a kind of architectural adjunct to its neighbors on museum row. It will bring together and influence generations of Jews. At just about any price, it’s a good investment.

Westside Renewal Read More »

Your Letters

Breitburn Oil

Julie Gruenbaum-Fax’s article (“Oil Loses Round,” May 4) should perhaps have been titled “Planet Earth Loses Round” as the so-called environmentalists seek to block the Breitburn plant on Pico.

The biggest failure — in a long list — of the Clinton administration is the virtual absence of an energy policy, for which we are now paying dearly. The plummeting of oil prices allowed us to reduce domestic oil exploration/exploitation to the lowest levels in 50 years, and to promote the widespread use of gas-slurping SUV’s. We are now paying the price for our collective folly.

The sooner we get our conservation policies in place, provide incentives for alternative energy, develop nuclear fuel production and — yes — encourage domestic oil production, the sooner we will be rid of our dependence on the Middle East for oil.

It is critical both for the geopolitical strategic position of Israel and for the ecology of the world. For there are are no environmental safeguards in the world’s major oil producing countries. The United States imposes the most stringent oil exploration protection.

And after all, we all live on planet earth. Not just in Pico-Robertson. Got a spare candle, anyone?

Selwyn Gerber, Beverly Hills


The Breitburn oil drilling project may be little-known outside the Pico-Robertson community but it was the fourth biggest project in City Hall defined by lobbyist expenditures of $396,635 last year.

The recent court rulings requiring Breitburn to reduce noise levels are a victory for the neighborhood, as your article points out, but do nothing regarding the larger problem of emissions from the site. The community is legitimately concerned because Proposition 65 warning signs are affixed to the Breitburn doors.

My suggestion is that the community needs to be reassured and safeguarded in two ways. First, regular monitoring for health effects, based on child-specific standards, needs to be done by an independent party such as the UCLA School of Public Health. Second, enforcement of the permit conditions needs to be conducted by an independent agency as well. The community has no reason to trust in-house monitoring and enforcement on a project that is so politicized and lubricated with lobbyist money.

Such independent monitoring and enforcement would assure that no health issue goes unreported or unchecked. This proposal represents no threat to the project if it is conducted properly, but would certainly increase the peace of mind of the community.

Tom Hayden, via e-mail


Cancer Resource

The May 11 cover story on cancer was both informative and extremely moving. Although The Journal listed many of the important cancer resources in the community, I noted one that was omitted. The John Wayne Cancer Institute at St. John’s Hospital, which is the location of the Joyce Eisenberg Keefer Breast Center, is another valuable community resource, which the members of our community should keep in mind.

John R. Fishel, President, The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles

Editor’s Note: The Joyce Eisenberg Keefer Breast Center offers comprehensive programs, including screening and diagnostic mammography, breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, education and support services. For more information, call (310) 582-7100.


Strasser and Smith

What’s wrong with you guys? Has anyone thought of introducing J.D. Smith to Teresa Strasser? It would be a match made in Singles heaven.

Joseph N. Feinstein, Sherman Oaks


Pope’s Silence

We Jews are losing the media war between the Arabs and Israel. While the pope did not want to be part of this war and was on a mission of reconciliation, his presence gave the hatemongers an international platform, and by remaining silent he endorsed their repetition of the libel Jews have carried on their backs for almost 2,000 years (“Pope Blasted for Silence,” May 11).

American Jews must be kept informed about what is going on and they must join in writing to the media who repeat these terrible misstatements and lies. We must protect what we have achieved here in the United States and we must protect our fellow Jews in Israel or wherever they may be.

Harold L. Katz, Los Angeles


Capital Punishment

Regarding rabbinic injunctions against capital punishment cited by Stephen F. Rhode (Letters, April 20), we have commemorated yet another Yom HaShoah, but has Rhode drawn any connection between his high principles and the murder of millions of innocents? Would he have opposed the execution of top Nazis? Balked at executing the willing executioners of the SS? Appealed to rabbinic authority on behalf of Adolf Eichmann? Israel, contrary to its policy on capital punishment, found itself in the paradoxical position of executing Eichmann. Rhode fails to see the difference between the murder of innocents and the execution of those who have murdered them.

On Talmudic interpretations requiring two witnesses to a murder, and a murderer’s right to be informed of the consequences of his crime — this is sophistry, because 1) there are usually no witnesses to most premeditated murders; and 2) murderers, nowadays, even if warned, would laugh at such warnings, given the tortuously slow appeals process.

That “all civilized countries have abolished capital punishment” is hardly to their credit. The hallmark of a civilization is not how it venerates all life, but how precious it holds innocent life.

Sam Bluefarb, Diamond Bar


Exodus Controversy

The Jewish Journal has covered the story of Sinai Temple’s Rabbi David Wolpe and the controversy of the Exodus story very well. All of the responses have merit, including Rob Eshman’s editorial (“Wolpe Hurricane,” April 20).

I have another approach, one that would help bring more unity to the Jewish people of whatever denomination or belief: I propose a public forum in which a Reform, Conservative and Orthodox rabbis could participate in expressing their respective perspective in the Exodus story. This type of public airing would go a long way in clarifying any misconceptions that might have occurred in the emotionally charged atmosphere that ensued.

Bernard Nichols, Los Angeles


I must take issue with Michael Berenbaum’s issue of comparison between Exodus denial and Holocaust denial (Letters, May 11). He distinguishes Holocaust denial as “pernicious and most often motivated by venom.” Apparently, Berenbaum is not familiar with the many statements by liberal and so-called progressive rabbis in the past. To Jews who teach their children about the Exodus and that some 3 million Jews were at Sinai to receive the Torah from G-d, those events were as real as the concentration camps during the Holocaust. The propagation of Holocaust denial is enabled by profound ignorance. Exodus denial is rooted in profound ignorance of Torah and its Mesorah of the last 3,300 years.

Howard Winter, Beverly Hills

Correction

In the May 11 Table of Contents, under the headline “Papal Criticism,” the anti-Semitic comment came from the leader of Syria, not Jordan.

The phone number for information regarding the support group for parents of special needs children at Sinai Temple — (310) 761-8800 ext. 1255 — was listed in a May 4 letter from Marilyn Stern. The contact person at this number is Sally Weber, not Marilyn Stern.

Your Letters Read More »

Talking With Zev

With the mayoral election less than three weeks away, the Jewish vote is ready for its closeup. Pollster Paul Goodwin tells me that as of 10 days ago, Jewish voters — one-third of likely voters in the 5th City Council district, which stretches from Pico-Robertson to the Valley — are leaning toward the first Latino candidate in modern times, Antonio Villaraigosa, with 41 percent supporting the former Assembly Speaker, compared with 35 percent for his rival, City Attorney James Hahn.

The 5th, home to City Councilman Michael Feuer — now battling for city attorney — former City Councilwoman Roz Wyman and Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, is the district that created and sustained the black-Jewish coalition. Goodwin says that Villaraigosa’s strongest support is 3-1 among liberals and 55-41 among voters under 35 as voters attempt to forge a similar Latino-Jewish link. Seventy-nine percent of Jews in the district are Democrats.

The 5th District’s Jewish vote split 50-50 eight years ago when Richard Riorden defeated Mike Woo. Goodwin’s poll shows Hahn leading among conservatives 3-1 and moderates 2-1, but among liberal voters — 45 percent of the Jewish vote in the district — Villaraigosa leads 3-1.

First-time voters under 35 lean heavily toward Villaraigosa, while voters older than 75 favor Hahn.

"It’s an odd race," Goodwin said. "There’s no center, but the left in the district is huge."

The multicultural contours of the mayoral race became more obvious this week when 8th District City Councilman Mark Ridley-Thomas put together a blacks-for-Antonio coalition comprised of young leaders who knew not Hahn’s dad. And it continued Monday when Yaroslavsky made headlines in the Los Angeles Times by endorsing Villaraigosa with these key words: "I feel comfortable with him."

I spoke with Yaroslavsky at his request on Tuesday, the day after he gave Villaraigosa his nod. More than elaborating on Villaraigosa’s professional talents, Zev wanted to set the present moment in its Jewish context, since he believes that this race will put Los Angeles and its varying populations on a set course whether Villaraigosa wins or not. Though Bradley was defeated in 1969, by 1973 his coalition was strong enough to rule Los Angeles for more than two decades.

Moreover, the moderate political style of that coalition, whose members include Yvonne Brathwaite Burke and the late Julian Dixon, established a tone of decency and openness that Jews, among others, have come to take for granted. The ramifications of the June 5 election for the Latino-Jewish coalition could not be more obvious.

"This election is all about Antonio," Yaroslavsky told me. "Hahn is fine, a good man. But he’s not the issue. The issue is Antonio and whether we in our community understand what motivates him. He is not one who says ‘We’ll go it alone,’ to get his 35-40 percent and forget everyone else."

To prove his point, Yaroslavsky recalled the heat he received in the Latino community over the decision to end subway construction in favor of more buses. "Antonio resisted the pressure to criticize me. He said, this isn’t an ethnic issue, it’s a fiscal issue, a transportation issue. As a result he endured no little ridicule from some in his own community. Antonio’s critics today are in defeat, but who knows what the future will bring.

"No, Antonio is making a case that to govern Los Angeles you have to be a bridge-builder and to reach out not out of necessity but out of conviction."

Is it too much to lay responsibility for coalition at the chads of the Jewish voter? Maybe it’s just doing what comes naturally.

"Coalition has great importance to the Jewish community," Yaroslavsky said. "As a member of one of L.A.’s smallest and most distinct minorities, I believe we as Jews have a vested interest in supporting this idea of governance, which reaches out from its own base. It’s not only that we’re becoming a smaller percentage of the population and our influence will inevitably decline unless we build coalitions. It’s that we actually fare best in a society that encourages collaboration, coalition and inclusion."

There was poignancy in our conversation, the end of an era. Less than a year before, we’d had lunch during which he attempted to articulate just why he himself wasn’t jumping into the mayoral race. Could he have gotten to 51 percent?

"There were three Jewish candidates already in the race," he laughed. "Steve Soboroff, Joel Wachs and Antonio. I’d be number four. How many Jewish coalition-building liberals are there in this city?"

But more seriously, Yaroslavsky seemed to accept his strengths as a self-described "warrior" who made enemies for a cause.

"I’m content with who I am," said the supervisor whose career path, representing 2 million residents in the Westside and Valley, is no longer in doubt.

Maybe instead of a new frontier, we’re coming full circle. After a gap of nearly a decade, the unfinished coalition of blacks, Jews and Latinos — the coalition begun by Bradley, Henry Waxman and Howard Berman and Ed Roybal — is together again at last.

Talking With Zev Read More »

Increased Sympathies

At noon Tuesday, life among Israel’s 1 million Arab citizens came to a standstill.

For the first time in the history of the state, Arabs in Israel stood up for a moment of silence — commemorating Al Nakba — Arabic for "the catastrophe," which is what Palestinians call the 1948 creation of the State of Israel.

This was the second time this year that Israeli Arabs marked the Nakba.

The Supreme Guidance Committee, the leaders of Israel’s Arab community, chose to commemorate the event on the anniversary of the official declaration of Israel’s independence, May 14. To them, the commemoration was a way of emphasizing that one people’s independence meant the other’s tragedy.

Gone are the days when Israel’s Arab citizens joined the country’s independence celebrations. Moreover, they no longer adopt the passive stand of not celebrating, but not spoiling the party for the Jews. In recent years they have made a point of telling their Jewish compatriots that the Palestinians paid a price for Israel’s independence as a Jewish state.

This year, they voiced that point louder than ever. Commemorating the Nakba was another expression of solidarity with the Palestinian Al-Akba uprising that has raged since September.

As barriers are lifted between Israel’s Arabs and their brethren in the Palestinian territories, another wall is being built between them and Israel’s Jews.

In the last elections to the premiership, only 15 percent of Arab voters showed up at the polling stations — a huge decrease from earlier elections.

"Boycotting the elections was but the first step to say that we understand the depth of the crisis," said Prof. Nadim Ruhana, of the sociology department at Tel Aviv University. He spoke at a symposium held this week at the Truman Institute at the Hebrew University, discussing the crisis among Israel’s Arabs following the outbreak of the intifada. "The only possible solution for the crisis is a binational state," he added.

In simpler language, that means an end to Israel as a Jewish state.

Among his Jewish colleagues who were shocked at the comment was Rafi Israeli, a historian at the Hebrew University.

He rose up and replied, emotionally, to Ruhana, "You Arabs have 22 countries, you Palestinians will soon have your own state and eventually you will control Jordan as well, why can’t you accept Israel as a Jewish state?"

Indeed, this was the theme this week in Nakba ceremonies throughout the Middle East. Fifty-three years after the establishment of the state, 23 years after peace with Egypt, seven years after peace with Jordan, Arabs are less inclined to accept Israel as a legitimate Jewish state than they had been up until the outbreak of the Al-Aksa intifada.

"The gravest issue is the Palestinian demand to implement their so-called Right of Return," said Yehoshua Porat, professor emeritus at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, a leading expert on the history of the Palestinians. "They have turned May 15 from a day of commemoration into a day of closing ranks for the future."

According to Porat, the Palestinians’ latest tactic is to insist on "reopening the 1948 files," including the demand that Palestinian refugees be allowed to return to what is now Israel.

Not surprisingly, hardly a Palestinian leader will disagree. Hadash Knesset Member Issam Mahoul said Tuesday that Israel should accept the Right of Return.

"Its implementation will be subject to negotiations," he added, trying to soften the impact of the statement for the Jewish listener.

The Palestinians in the territories marked the "catastrophe" with violent demonstrations in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, demanding "an end to occupation" and the dismantling of Israeli settlements.

Their brethren within Israel proper marked the day in a much quieter fashion. They staged rallies, visited some of the 400 Palestinian villages that were destroyed during the War of Independence and observed moments of silence.

But their message was loud and clear — not only did they want to "reopen the 1948 files" and negotiate the return of their relatives from their exile overseas, they also insisted on full equality with Jewish citizens in Israel.

Lutfi Mash’ur, editor of a popular Arabic newspaper published in Nazareth, believes there is no contradiction between Tuesday’s actions and the desires of Israeli Arabs to become an integral part of Israeli society.

"Acts of protest like the Nakba revolt are part of the Israelization process of the Arabs," said Mash’ur.

He noted that, paradoxically, the now-suspended negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians intensified local Palestinian demands.

"At the time, when an agreement seemed to be in the making, Israel’s Arabs felt that they were still a part of the problem, but were not treated as part of the solution."

Indeed, just as former Premier Ehud Barak negotiated with the Palestinians, he hardly found time to meet with Israel’s Arab Knesset members. Moreover, the local population felt that it was way in the bottom of the previous government’s set of priorities.

According to Mash’ur this is still very much so, despite the setback in the negotiations with the Palestinians. Mash’ur, like many others, anticipates that negotiations will be renewed, sooner or later — and then, what about the local Arab population?

"Each of our protests is geared to say we are here. We don’t want to join the territories, but rather to prove our legitimacy here in Israel."

Increased Sympathies Read More »

Israel’s Wagner Taboo

Ideology seems to have won out over culture in Israel: The taboo on playing the music of pre-Nazi German composer Richard Wagner in concert has been upheld.

After strenuous protests by Holocaust survivor groups, backed by virtually the entire Israeli political spectrum, the decision was taken last week to look for an alternative to the Wagner concert that had been scheduled for this summer’s Israel Festival, the country’s annual international cultural showcase.

The traditional Israeli ban on Wagner’s operas has loosened of late; last October the Israel Symphony Orchestra in Rishon Lezion gave the first public performance of a Wagner work, albeit a nonideological one. Yet the Israel Festival’s plan for this country’s second public performance of Wagner was incomparably more ambitious and conspicuous: Israel-bred superstar conductor Daniel Barenboim was to bring his Staatskapelle Berlin orchestra to Jerusalem’s Convention Center on July 7 to perform a piece from the opera "Die Walküre," which the concert’s opponents say is a horrifically anti-Semitic German tale. Placido Domingo was to sing the lead.

The concert has not been officially canceled; the festival’s board of directors said it did not want to act as a censor. Yet after having twice previously endorsed the concert, the board ordered the festival’s artistic team to meet with Barenboim and try to find an alternative to the Wagner piece in light of the protests that have arisen.

Beneath the official level, though, in the stratum where music, not ideology, reigns, Israel takes a very different view. Professional classical musicians here — players, conductors and composers — have long chafed under the Wagner ban. With few exceptions, they want his works to be performed openly in Israel, even while fully recognizing that he was an especially demonic Jew-hater and a Nazi favorite. Many play Wagner abroad, including in Germany.

They argue that musical notes and rests cannot be anti-Semitic, and that even Wagner’s lyrics aren’t explicitly so, either. And even if they are, said Israel Festival artistic director Micha Lewensohn, "Did you ever read the lyrics to Bach’s passions?"

And if anti-Semites are to be banned from Israeli concert halls, most classical musicians say, the list might well begin with Wagner, but would also have to take in Beethoven, Tchaikovsky, Chopin and many other local favorites.

As for the sensitivities of Holocaust survivors, who number some 300,000 in Israel, some leading advocates of Wagner in concert are themselves survivors or children of survivors, and they say they’ve received outspoken encouragement from a number of others.

The conductor of Wagner in Rishon Lezion last October was Mendi Rodan, a Holocaust survivor and former director of Jerusalem’s Rubin Academy of Music, Israel’s leading training ground for classical musicians. Rodan conducts Wagner frequently in Europe. Though the Rishon Lezion performance was briefly disrupted by a Holocaust survivor in the audience who rattled a Purim noisemaker, Rodan said other survivors were among the audience of about 500 that applauded the performance of the "Siegfried Idyll."

The country’s leading orchestra, the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra (IPO), is officially against playing Wagner "as long as a single Holocaust survivor who objects is still alive," said Avi Shoshani, the IPO’s director-general. But among the 100 or more musicians in the orchestra, "more than 90 percent of them want to play Wagner," Shoshani said, noting that this was their view as far back as the 1970s, when the IPO first canvassed them on the issue.

Along with Barenboim, the other star conductor who has tried to wedge Wagner onto the Israeli stage is Zubin Mehta, the conductor most closely associated with the IPO. In 1981 Mehta conducted the IPO in an encore from the opera "Tristan und Isolde," but an usher went onstage and bared scars he’d received at a concentration camp, and Mehta halted the performance. Until about a decade ago, there was a ban on performing Richard Strauss, who was adopted by the Nazis in his old age — and soon renounced because he wasn’t sufficiently anti-Semitic — and on the works of Carl Orff, a lesser Jew-hater. Israel has since "rehabilitated" these composers enough to be played in public.

But Wagner? To use an Israeli saying, that’s a whole different opera.

Israel’s Wagner Taboo Read More »

The Impact of Intermarriage

Jewish women who are intermarried create much more Jewishly identified households than do Jewish men married to non-Jews.

But regardless of whether the mother is Jewish, most interfaith families — even those raising their children as Jews — incorporate substantial Christian celebrations into their lives, often including more Christian aspects as the couple and their children age.

And despite the conventional wisdom that intermarriage is inevitable in an open society, Jews whose parents encourage them to marry within the faith are more likely to do so than those whose parents do not express an opinion on intermarriage.

These are some of the assertions of a new American Jewish Committee (AJC) study on intermarried families in which the non-Jewish spouse has not converted.

Based on extensive interviews with 254 people from 127 households, the study offers a glimpse into how intermarried families — particularly ones that are raising their children exclusively as Jews — balance Jewishness with the competing pull of the non-Jewish spouse’s background and family. The participants lived in New England, New Jersey, Denver and Atlanta.

But because it relies on information from a relatively small sample of families, and because it supplies ammunition to those strongly opposed to intermarriage — including a national "inmarriage" coalition formed by the AJC — the study likely will be greeted with skepticism from advocates of outreach to the intermarried.

The AJC says the study proves that "the dynamics of Jewish identity within mixed marriage are particularly ominous for Jewish continuity" and that the Jewish community needs to be more aggressive in promoting inmarriage.

Months before the study was completed, the AJC formed its coalition promoting inmarriage, and one of its members — Jack Wertheimer, the provost of the Conservative movement’s Jewish Theological Seminary — published an essay critiquing outreach to the intermarried in the March issue of Commentary magazine.

For years, Jewish leaders have divided into "inreach" and "outreach" camps on intermarriage — those who say scarce resources should be used to strengthen the Jewish commitments of people already engaged in Jewish life as opposed to those who support efforts welcoming intermarried families and encouraging their involvement in the Jewish community.

Backers of inreach often argue that welcoming the intermarried actually encourages intermarriage by reducing the stigma of marrying outside the faith.

While the leaders have debated such issues, most American Jews have quietly grown to accept intermarriage.

Ten years ago the National Jewish Population Survey reported that approximately half of the American Jews who had married during the previous five years had married non-Jews.

This fall, an AJC survey found that half of American Jews believe opposition to intermarriage is "racist," while 78 percent think rabbis should officiate at weddings between Jews and non-Jews.

The majority of rabbis do not officiate at such weddings: Orthodox and Conservative rabbis are forbidden to do so, and — according to a 1999 survey by the Rabbinic Center for Research and Counseling — 57 percent of Reform and Reconstructionist rabbis refuse to do so.

The new study is written by Sylvia Barack Fishman, co-director of the Hadassah International Research Institute on Jewish Women, a professor in Brandeis University’s Near Eastern and Judaic studies department and a member of the AJC coalition promoting in-marriage.

It is one of the first "qualitative" studies on intermarried families, based not on survey data but on focus groups and interviews with what is believed to be a representative sample. While it covers a range of families — including ones where both the husband and wife are Jewish — the study focuses on interfaith families that say they are raising their children as Jews.

According to the study, those families often send more diluted messages about Jewishness as the children age. For example, many Jewish parents initially refuse to celebrate Christmas or Easter in the home but eventually compromise out of a desire to be fair to their spouses or because aging in-laws are no longer able to host Christian holiday celebrations.

Saying she does not want to be "rigid," one Jewish woman in the study tells how she hosts Easter dinner for her husband’s family, even cooking ham for the occasion.

In attempting to balance the Jewish upbringing with the influences of Christian relatives, one family ended up insulting their Jewish-raised child, as the grown child reports in the study: "Now we would go there for Christmas, and my cousins would all be getting toys from Santa, and I’d be getting gifts from the dog because my Mom felt bad. From the dog … because she [thought I shouldn’t] get gifts from Santa. Like that’s just outrageous."

The study also found that many non-Jewish parents eventually grew to resent their children’s Jewish upbringing, though they initially had agreed to the concept. The resentment stemmed from a feeling of exclusion — particularly when the child learned unfamiliar rituals and language — as well as a general discomfort with organized religion.

Many non-Jews married to Jews also expressed discomfort with what they saw as the Jewish community’s exclusivity and the idea of Jews being a "chosen people."

In addition to reporting on the family dynamics of the intermarried, the study also looks at the influence of parents on whether their children intermarry. It reports that 62 percent of the intermarried Jews said their parents had made no comments discouraging them from marrying outside the faith.

Roughly the same percentage of Jews married to Jews — or to people who had converted to Judaism — said their parents had discouraged them from intermarrying.

In addition, intermarried Jews who had grown up with several years of Jewish education, celebrating many Jewish holidays and having some Shabbat observance were more likely to raise their children exclusively as Jews.

Some of the other findings:

  • Approximately three-fourths of Jewish women married to non-Jews say they are raising their children exclusively as Jews, compared to slightly less than half of intermarried Jewish men.

  • While the majority of interfaith families, except those raising their children as Christian, celebrated Chanukah and Passover, other holidays were observed less frequently.

  • Interfaith couples discussed the religion of the household and potential children when the relationship got "serious," rather than waiting until they had married.

The Impact of Intermarriage Read More »

Meditations on Yoga

The doctor said that the best thing for my injury was yoga. It would increase blood flow, reduce stress, open my chakras (whatever they are) and make me more limber. I went to get a second opinion but that guy said the same thing.

That week, I left work a little early, sped across town through rush-hour traffic listening to the latest horror story on the radio, circled for a parking spot, ran for the elevator, raced to get changed and then went inside to have someone tell me to hurry up, close my eyes and relax.

The first thing you do is in yoga class is lie down on a little plastic mat and breathe. That sounds easy enough, but I keep doing it wrong. Imagine being told you don’t know how to either lie down or breathe. Midway through a difficult pose, the instructor — or maybe she’s a yogi, but Barbara doesn’t sound like a very yogish name, if you know what I mean — says: “Don’t forget to breathe,” and the whole class grunts out an exhale as one. I take comfort in the knowledge that I’m not alone.

Then, after twisting my spine into a pretzel for an hour or so, she sends us back into the maelstrom and, presto, my murderous road-rage impulse is gone. Some people say you can’t put a price on peace of mind. I say it runs $15 for about 90 minutes.

I’ve now spent a total of 24 hours in something called “down dog,” but I’m still terrible at yoga. (All of the postures have deceptively cute, organic names — there is “tree” and “turtle” and another that I hope will some day be outlawed by the Geneva Convention called “pigeon.”) Fortunately, the way yoga works is that it’s okay to be terrible. In fact, admitting that you suck is a big step in becoming balanced in your practice. You don’t actually want to become “good” at it, because good is an ego thing, and that’s bad. Even the really good people in yoga class are only practicing, and they’re not even practicing for anything. Unless you’re doing it with my sister, yoga is not a competitive sport. There is no big game, no playoffs, no standings are listed in the paper. You never have any idea if you’re winning or losing because there’s nothing to win.

Frankly, I think the whole idea is un-American. I sometimes wonder why we, at the pinnacle of technological progress and human achievement, look to ancient Oriental health and fitness practices from cultures that have disappeared into history. If these guys were so clever, how come they’re not around any more? Why aren’t they ruling the world? Got an answer for that one? Were they too busy doing yoga to keep the Huns outside the palace walls? We’re taking a page from the losing team’s playbook. Knowing how to reduce stress doesn’t necessarily help you if your entire civilization is extinct.

At some point it dawned on me that I was surrounded by agile women. (Bonus!) Women love yoga. This is what they do. This is where they hang out. A man going to yoga class is like a woman going to a driving range. You want to catch fish? Fish where the fish are. It’s like a singles bar where no one drinks and everyone wears revealing clothes and demonstrates what they’re capable of if called upon to perform the “bow” pose as a party trick.

Some of the women in my class have no bones in their joints and limbs that seem to be made of spaghetti. There’s one lady who, near as I can figure, must have grown up as a contortionist in the Cirque du Soleil. I’m a little afraid of her. Call me old fashioned, but I don’t think you should be able to put your toe in your ear. Then Yogi Barbara instructs us variously to “get on all fours,” “spread your thighs” and “go a little deeper.” It doesn’t require an especially active imagination to get intrigued by the possibilities of applying this learning outside of class. I have to remind myself to breathe.

If someone tells you about a good yoga class, it’s one you can’t actually do. I go twice a week now, and I’m happy to report that I hurt in so many new places — places that I didn’t even know existed a month ago — that I’ve forgotten why I started going in the first place. It’s like hitting yourself in the thumb with a hammer to get your mind off a headache.

My friend Karen moved around from class to class until, she said, “I’ve found one that’s so painful and humiliating, I don’t need a man in my life anymore.”

Exhale, Karen.

Meditations on Yoga Read More »

Creating Order

Every Monday evening of the recently concluded semester at USC, I met with a diverse group of students in a residence hall lounge to view and discuss the "Decalogue" films created by the late Polish director Krzysztof Kieslowski. Each film in this justly praised series presents an unusual situation standing in oblique relationship to one of the Ten Commandments. Thus, a professor who regards rational calculation as ultimate truth loses his skating child to ice that, by all calculation, ought not to have broken; and a brutal, unmotivated killing is juxtaposed with the murderer’s own death through capital punishment.

Like our rabbis, Kieslowski understood that biblical texts require continuing interpretation. He conveyed two ideas that seem incompatible: first, that standards of right and wrong are built into the universe, governing human life; and second, that human beings usually must search out those standards, much as his characters (and we viewers) glimpse a recurring angel-like figure in his films.

When the Torah portions Behar and Bechukotai are yoked together, as this year, we encounter diverse material framed at beginning and end by reference to God addressing the children of Israel through Moses on Mount Sinai. The first material encountered concerns shmitah — the sabbatical year for agricultural land. Acknowledging possible disjunction between the framing introduction’s grandeur and the nitty-gritty that follows, the rabbis formulate what becomes a paradigmatic question: "What are the sabbatical laws doing at Mount Sinai?"

Good reasons exist for rooting such laws at Mount Sinai, for their details aim at something large: creating an ideal society. Judaism takes seriously both the general phenomenon of being commanded and the crystallization of specific mitzvot. We rise when the Ten Commandments are recited in synagogue and often model the two tablets on the Holy Ark. But the early rabbis set us on a sure course by insisting that not simply those commandments but rather a whole comprehensive system is incumbent upon us.

Of course, the mitzvah system bears upon Jews affiliated with the various movements, Jews of different temperaments and backgrounds, in a spectrum of ways. All along the spectrum though, we take pride in two Jews having "three opinions" and also in our tradition’s emphasis on right action. We are proud that behavior, not belief, stands at our Jewish core.

Essentially, we look at things much the way Kieslowski did. He discerned a moral order grounded in divinity, while also often finding it challenging to discern that order’s clear outlines amidst the push and pull of life. Life is messy, things happen at once, and the situations in which we find ourselves don’t precisely line up with Torah and Talmud. That’s why we need rabbis and also artists: to embed the sparks of divine truth, the general principles and even specific commandments, in the living reality of our time and lives.

Faced with the modern world’s complexity, some college students move toward a moral relativism in which anything goes. But most young and older people want to believe that truth and standards for right action exist. While some embrace scriptural literalism, many grope towards a middle way in which the commanding presence of God leaves room for human interpretation and choice. I myself feel sure that at Mount Sinai, our ancestors encountered that presence in a manner that echoes through Jewish and human history. I draw strength from that encounter and try to be faithful to both God and my own lights.

With Behar-Bechukotai, we end the Book of Leviticus, whose final words are "These are the commandments that Adonai commanded Moses for the children of Israel in Mount Sinai." In shul on Shabbat morning, we will rise and call out in one voice to the Torah reader, "Chazak, chazak, v’nitchazek." And the reader echoes this call, assuring us that our attachment to God, Torah and the Jewish People will, indeed, see us through to the end.

Creating Order Read More »

Childhood’s Sweet Sharp Imprint

It is summer, a long time ago, and I am lying on a terrace overlooking an ancient garden full of rosebushes and fruit trees. The days have been so hot, the asphalt on the sidewalk melts under my feet if I dare step out of the house. At night, the temperature drops. My sisters and I take the hose to the yard and stand there as the day’s heat rises out of the brick floor in a cloud of white steam. My mother spreads our bed on the terrace, and we crawl into it, hours before we can actually fall asleep. We thrash about in the cool sheets that smell of dust, summer and lavender bleach; listen to the music that drifts up from our grandmother’s radio downstairs; eat fresh mulberries we have picked from the tree in our own yard.

Our mother, 16 years old when she had her first child, has already lived a lifetime by 20. She is so young that she can play with us all day without losing her patience, so old she knows a thousand tales from a thousand lives already spent.

"Tell us a story," I ask, and she does.

"There is a girl," she says, "so fair, boys follow her home from school just to get a glimpse of her on the way, so kind, she cries at the sight of poor children begging on the streets of Tehran. Her mother has to buy her shoes every week because she keeps giving them away to kids who come to school barefoot. Once, she gives her uniform to a girl who doesn’t have one and walks home herself in her undershirt.

"Who is this girl?" I ask.

"My sister," she says.

"What happened to her?"

"She died of typhoid fever. Her spirit became a white butterfly and came back to visit our house every year."

The summers in Tehran are long and slow and smeared with boredom. I play cowboys and Indians in the yard with my sisters. My mother teaches me to cook rice, to embroider white handkerchiefs. My teachers have given me homework for all three months of vacation: "Copy the text and the drawings of entire books, word for word, including title and copyright pages. It’s good for your penmanship," they say. "It’s even better for your parents’ peace of mind. "

Sometimes my parents take us to the seashore in the North. We get up in the dark, four in the morning, so we can be there by sunrise. My sisters and I haven’t slept all night from excitement. We drive out of the city and into the mountains beyond. We cross passes so narrow, one false move would land the car at the bottom of a valley. We go through emerald jungles, past crystal waterfalls, across golden rice fields. On the other side, we can smell the sea.

"Tell us a story," we ask my mother in the car.

"There is a woman," she says, "so alone, she lives in a single room in the basement of a house in a town no one visits. She’s not old, but she’s beaten, not mute, but she won’t talk. She sits in her room all day and embroiders white handkerchiefs, signing her name and a blue butterfly in the corner. She has embroidered so many handkerchiefs, her room is overrun by them, stacked floor to ceiling, wall to wall. In her youth she had been so beautiful, her father used to hide her for fear of avid suitors, so cherished, her mother braided her hair into a dozen strands, then tied each braid with a golden coin. But she fell in love with a man who wasn’t a Jew, and she ran away with him, and when he became old and died, she could not go home to her own people anymore.

"What are the handkerchiefs for?" I ask.

"To dry her tears," she says, "over her sorrow for leaving her home."

In the fall, my mother sends us to school wrapped in coats and shawls and too many sweaters.

"Eat your lunch and keep your sweater on," she says every morning. "Pay attention in class and study hard. You have to go to college, get a job, have a career. A woman is nothing if she doesn’t have a job. Most of all, though, remember not to take your sweater off."

Years later, in America, my son will call her "the sweater police."

"Why does Giti always make me wear sweaters?" he asks, and I find that the answer is on the tip of my tongue, embedded in my consciousness, ready to pour out.

All winter, we walk through snow piled knee-high on the streets to get to school. At home, we do homework till the late hours of the night, watch "Days of Our Lives" on television once a week, eat salami sandwiches on white bread with pickles. My father’s relatives visit every week, sometimes every day. A few of them live with us year-long; a few stay for months at a time. An uncle leaves for Canada with $700 in his pockets and will become one of the richest men in the world. Another uncle sits by a brazier day and night and smokes something I am told is tobacco. My older sister listens to Barry White albums and declares she is going to live in Europe, or America, or anywhere people make that kind of music. My younger sister plays with Barbie dolls and speaks French like a native. I linger around the house, watching my mother and the people she interacts with, listening to their conversations, recording their emotions.

"I am going to send you to Europe to study," my mother declares. "You’d better get good grades and go to a good college. A woman needs higher education, independence, freedom."

I am 13 years old. I must have gotten good grades because I’m about to leave for Europe. My mother buys me a suitcase full of new clothes. She gives me a bracelet made of gold, my name carved on the plate. The day before I am to leave, her own grandmother, the famous Peacock, comes to say goodbye. She’s 80 years old by her own account, 110 by others’. She walks around the streets of Tehran dressed in layers of pink and red and yellow chiffon, her head covered with a scarf, her hair dyed with henna and tied in braids. She gives advice whether you asked for it or not. She tells my mother that birth control is a sin — especially if you are preventing the birth of a boy. She says antibiotics kill people. She says divorce is madness: "A husband," she says, "is like a crown of jewels. With it, a woman is a queen. Without it, she’s nothing but a woman."

She should know, I think. She divorced her own husband a thousand years ago, refused to go back, made a life for herself selling jewels to women with husbands.

In our dining room that day, she puts her hands in her pockets and scoops out fistfuls of color.

"Look here," she says, letting a string of jewels — diamonds and rubies and sapphires the color of the night — roll off her hands and onto the table. "You can pick what you like."

Through the years of school in Europe and later in the United States, I carry these stories, the voices of the people who spoke them, the mystery that surrounded them, as if they were an arm’s-reach away. In America, I hear different versions of the same truths. I discover facts that my mother had censored in her long-ago tales, I come to conclusions that she will neither deny nor confirm. I find humor, tragedy, drama. I even learn what the great-uncle really smoked in that pipe.

When my stories are published, my mother goes to every one of my readings and brings along her entire family. She reads all the reviews, checks the best-seller lists every week, buys copies of the book at every store in town. She gives the books to her friends, her hairdresser, her kosher butcher, the Israeli Minister of Defense. She brings them to me to autograph before she gives them away. "Write something good," she says. "Make it personal."

I am signing books by the dozen, wondering how to get personal with the butcher, what the Israeli Defense Minister will think of my tales of women who cry into tear-jars and men who balance gold coins at the tips of their male organs.

"Who’s buying all these books?" a reporter asks me when the sales figures show up.

"My mother and my sisters," I say, and the woman laughs, thinking it must be a joke.

But then the dust settles, and the excitement wears off, and my mother actually begins to read this book she has a thousand copies of. She calls me daily to tell me what I got wrong, what I have neglected to mention, what I should have left out. She asks other people what they thought of the book. Everyone has an opinion, especially those who have not read it and do not intend to. They, in fact, are most convinced of what I should and should not have put in these stories, and my mother records their thoughts and repeats them to me loyally.

As if to help her along, my friends confront me and say they never knew what kinds of thoughts circled in my mind. Strangers come up to me at parties and complain that they cried reading a passage, that they were pregnant when they read the book, that crying is bad for pregnant women. American audiences come to my readings and ask me specific questions about individual Iranian neighbors and business partners — as if being Iranian has given me a window into the mind of each and every one of my countrymen, as if we are all the same — predictable and uniform as they have imagined us to be.

I should be writing by consensus, I think. I should take a poll before I start my next book.

This is what I want to say to my readers, what I have tried to conferee in the books: that we are all one and the same — Iranians and Americans and everyone in between; that with a bit of luck, perhaps a bit of skill, I can tell a tale, however personal, which will resonate with readers as foreign to me and my culture as they want to be. That it will resonate with them and remind them of their own lives and bring us, neighbors and strangers alike, together.

It’s spring, just before Mother’s Day, and my mother has called.

"Sign one more book for the rabbi at my temple," she says. "Write something good. Make it personal. I’m coming over to pick it up."

I hang up the phone and watch my children, dressed down to their T-shirts, scramble around the house, looking for their sweaters.

Childhood’s Sweet Sharp Imprint Read More »