A life devoted to antisemitism: The Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Navi Pillay, chair of the U.N. Commission of Inquiry that accused Israel of genocide in September 2025, could hardly have been more undeserved.
Nothing is more “mainstream” than the Nobel Prize, or more devoted to the supposed good of humanity. Only the truly respectable are admitted to its table. The prizes for science and medicine are different, but writers and politicians must wear a liberal badge bearing the word “peace,” even if they are terrorists, like Yasser Arafat; or “equality,” even if they have yet to accomplish anything, like Barack Obama.
The idea is to provide a role model whom we are supposed to admire and follow. We are used to it, but this time it is difficult: The Nobel has gone to a woman who has made hatred of Israel, transformed into a U.N. institution, her banner.
Her supposed commitment to the human rights she was meant to defend is belied by her lukewarm attention to so many crucial causes – China, Russia, Iran. One recalls a trip to Syria during the period of Bashar Assad’s massacres that failed to elicit any significant reaction from her.
Navi Pillay now ascends to the pantheon of inspiration for humanity that the prize aspires to represent. U.S. President Donald Trump wanted it, and instead it has gone to one of his enemies. It is an old-fashioned sneer at the stereotype of imperial America, but above all it is ideological confirmation that the aspirations of decent people for human rights, peace and freedom have been transferred wholesale into Palestinianism.
Pillay is a South African jurist whose selection once again illustrates the failure of the bloated international establishment — a failure that here extends to common sense and knowledge of the facts.
Pillay institutionalized the accusation of genocide in parallel with the still-unresolved proceedings at the International Court of Justice, and that sums up her story. Beginning in 2008, as U.N. high commissioner for human rights, she traveled the entire ideological road of neo-antisemitism that seeks to erase Israel, one indication of which is the accusation of colonialism that she readily repeats.
In 2010, she backed the mission headed by Richard Goldstone, which produced a report criminalizing Israel on the basis of prejudicial testimony, in the manner of Amnesty International. Goldstone later repudiated its central conclusion. During the difficult years marked by terrorism, rocket attacks and war through 2014, her criticism was so one-sided that she went so far as to complain that Gaza had not been provided with Iron Dome.
Since 2017, she has been a prominent supporter of the BDS campaign and signed “Sanction Apartheid Israel!” Between 2017 and 2022, among other things, she expressed the hope that “the Palestinian struggle against colonization” would lead to “boycott, divestment and sanctions.”
From BDS to apartheid – the most ridiculous of accusations; one need only visit schools, malls, hospitals and courtrooms – she has called for the suspension of international relations with Israel. In 2021, she signed a letter to U.S. President Joe Biden denouncing “the oppression of the Palestinian people.” In July 2022, she defended a member of her commission, Miloon Kothari, after he lashed out at “the Jewish lobby.”
And yet her appointment went ahead despite objections from organizations such as NGO Monitor and UN Watch.
Her commission’s accusation of genocide came on Oct. 28, 2025. Just as disturbing as the award itself has been the satisfaction with which it has been greeted across much of the international press, television and political establishment. The reaction demonstrates precisely what Pillay’s career represents: the transfer into Palestinianism of the entire package of causes once associated with human rights, peace and freedom.
Now she is the queen of anti-Jewish hatred. One wonders how much Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur on the Palestinian territories, envies her.
But no — the next prize will be hers.
Fiamma Nirenstein is an Italian-Israeli journalist and author.
Nobel Rewards Anti-Israel Crusade
Fiamma Nirenstein
A life devoted to antisemitism: The Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Navi Pillay, chair of the U.N. Commission of Inquiry that accused Israel of genocide in September 2025, could hardly have been more undeserved.
Nothing is more “mainstream” than the Nobel Prize, or more devoted to the supposed good of humanity. Only the truly respectable are admitted to its table. The prizes for science and medicine are different, but writers and politicians must wear a liberal badge bearing the word “peace,” even if they are terrorists, like Yasser Arafat; or “equality,” even if they have yet to accomplish anything, like Barack Obama.
The idea is to provide a role model whom we are supposed to admire and follow. We are used to it, but this time it is difficult: The Nobel has gone to a woman who has made hatred of Israel, transformed into a U.N. institution, her banner.
Her supposed commitment to the human rights she was meant to defend is belied by her lukewarm attention to so many crucial causes – China, Russia, Iran. One recalls a trip to Syria during the period of Bashar Assad’s massacres that failed to elicit any significant reaction from her.
Navi Pillay now ascends to the pantheon of inspiration for humanity that the prize aspires to represent. U.S. President Donald Trump wanted it, and instead it has gone to one of his enemies. It is an old-fashioned sneer at the stereotype of imperial America, but above all it is ideological confirmation that the aspirations of decent people for human rights, peace and freedom have been transferred wholesale into Palestinianism.
Pillay is a South African jurist whose selection once again illustrates the failure of the bloated international establishment — a failure that here extends to common sense and knowledge of the facts.
Pillay institutionalized the accusation of genocide in parallel with the still-unresolved proceedings at the International Court of Justice, and that sums up her story. Beginning in 2008, as U.N. high commissioner for human rights, she traveled the entire ideological road of neo-antisemitism that seeks to erase Israel, one indication of which is the accusation of colonialism that she readily repeats.
In 2010, she backed the mission headed by Richard Goldstone, which produced a report criminalizing Israel on the basis of prejudicial testimony, in the manner of Amnesty International. Goldstone later repudiated its central conclusion. During the difficult years marked by terrorism, rocket attacks and war through 2014, her criticism was so one-sided that she went so far as to complain that Gaza had not been provided with Iron Dome.
Since 2017, she has been a prominent supporter of the BDS campaign and signed “Sanction Apartheid Israel!” Between 2017 and 2022, among other things, she expressed the hope that “the Palestinian struggle against colonization” would lead to “boycott, divestment and sanctions.”
From BDS to apartheid – the most ridiculous of accusations; one need only visit schools, malls, hospitals and courtrooms – she has called for the suspension of international relations with Israel. In 2021, she signed a letter to U.S. President Joe Biden denouncing “the oppression of the Palestinian people.” In July 2022, she defended a member of her commission, Miloon Kothari, after he lashed out at “the Jewish lobby.”
And yet her appointment went ahead despite objections from organizations such as NGO Monitor and UN Watch.
Her commission’s accusation of genocide came on Oct. 28, 2025. Just as disturbing as the award itself has been the satisfaction with which it has been greeted across much of the international press, television and political establishment. The reaction demonstrates precisely what Pillay’s career represents: the transfer into Palestinianism of the entire package of causes once associated with human rights, peace and freedom.
Now she is the queen of anti-Jewish hatred. One wonders how much Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur on the Palestinian territories, envies her.
But no — the next prize will be hers.
Fiamma Nirenstein is an Italian-Israeli journalist and author.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Broken Glass and the Banality of Blueberries
One Book, Two Sisters, and the Fight to Keep the Holocaust Real
Warriors of Israel Advocates for Israel’s Heroes in California and Abroad
How My Mother’s Childhood Doodle Wound Up in the Venice Biennale and Why I Removed It
Israeli Journalist at VBS, 2026 Jewish Educator Awards Recipients
Superstitions and the Training Wheels of Faith
At Israel’s Low Point, Montreal Federation Throws a Wild Party
Here were thousands of proud Jews with Israeli flags dancing, reveling, rejoicing, as if the news never reached them about the global hate movement toward Israel.
Rabbis of LA | The Rembaums’ Happy Life Together
Second of two parts
Some LA Business Owners and Residents Taking Safety Into Their Own Hands
Several business owners interviewed by The Journal for this article said they had purchased firearms to protect their businesses and homes.
‘The Israeli in Me Came Out’: At 81, Howard Rosenman Fought His Attackers
“I did a film with Barbra Streisand, ‘The Main Event,’ in 1979. Nothing can scare me.”
Jewish Activist Says She Won’t Be Silenced After Being Attacked at the University of Michigan
Benichou hopes to see more people speaking up.
A Popular Skewer Recipe
There is a benefit of roasting food on skewers, à la shish kebab. By cutting meat and vegetables into smaller uniform pieces, the marinade coats more and the food cooks evenly.
Table for Five: Chayei Sarah
Commitment To Love
Settling on the Outskirts – A poem for Parsha Chayei Sara
The life of Sara ends with death.
A Moment in Time: Beyond Politics
A Bisl Torah ~ Love at First Hearing
Is attraction based solely on the physical? Or is chemistry based on something deeper?
Why Moses’ Name Is Changed to Menasseh in Judges
Why Israel’s Messy Election Should Worry Washington
The tight relationship between Trump and Netanyahu masks the real debate over Israel churning in the Republican Party, and Israel’s standing among Democrats has never been lower.
Jewish Community Weighs Implications of Democrats’ Midterm Election Victories
Some emphasized the importance of combating antisemitism and protecting Jewish safety, while others called for political engagement and cooperation across party lines.
Print Issue: Election Fever | November 6, 2026
What comes next?
Rosner’s Domain: Weeks of Known Unknowns
So here we are, stuck with just a few bad options to consider. And that’s just the political superposition of undetermined future – alongside it there’s also the possible – probable? – war with Iran.
The Switched Passport: A Lesson in Seeing the Other
That is my hope: that by finding things we can do together, by recognizing each other’s humanity, we might come to see each other more fully.
After the Last Out, Collect a Different Kind of Card
At a time when Jewish education is competing for attention in a world dominated by screens, sports, short-form videos and endless streams of content, these easily collectable cards offer a different kind of engagement.
6 Jewish Takeaways from the Midterm Elections
There is little chance that the combination of a weakened Trump and an emboldened Democratic Congress produces similar levels of support for aggressive action against Iran and its proxies, and other policies that a wide spectrum of Israelis see as crucial to their security.
Israel Drives Them Crazy
In the diaspora and in Israel, we cannot turn back the clock and undo the harm that was done to us. But we can shape our own future. Israel is strong and resolute. So must we be.
A Democratic-Run Congress Will Target Israel as Well as Trump
Democrats who were long considered “moderates” or even pro-Israel have been signaling over the course of the last year that they can no longer be relied upon to back a Jewish state under assault by Iran and its terrorist proxies.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.