fbpx

August 22, 2026

Israel Derangement Syndrome Hits Montreal City Council

The city of Montreal is so broke that the mayor quipped recently that the “city’s credit card is maxxed out.”

Meanwhile, the crises are proliferating, from a rise in poverty, crime and homelessness to decaying infrastructure, a lack of affordable housing and interminable waits for medical care.

So, naturally, on Monday the city council will vote on a motion to cut ties with Israel.

That’s not a typo.

They will look at the city’s multiple crises and fix their gaze…on Israel.

They won’t vote to cut ties with Nigeria, Somalia or Sudan, where genocidal efforts have led to the massacre of hundreds of thousands.

They won’t vote to cut ties with Russia, the invaders of Ukraine responsible for the deaths of more than a million.

Nor will they discuss Jordan and Lebanon, where nearly three million Palestinian refugees have been living for decades in misery, but no one talks about them because Jews are not involved.

And they will ignore China, a ruthless regime that has put a million Muslim Uyghurs in veritable concentration camps.

No, the city council will vote to cut ties with only one country– the Jewish one. No other city has gone this far, which means that if the motion passes, other cities are sure to get ideas.

This is Israel Derangement Syndrome par excellence.

The motion is coming from an opposition group called Projet Montreal. The fact that they’ve managed to bring the motion to an official vote is yet another sign of the growing animosity toward Jews and Israel today.

In 2025, Jews were the targets of 70 per cent of all police-reported hate crimes in Canada. It’s no secret that, as I read in a recent report, “Jewish schools in Montréal have been shot at, Jewish people have been assaulted, synagogues have been attacked, and antisemitism has entered academic and professional spaces through intimidation, threats, and exclusion.”

How much more can Jews take?

When I came here this week to visit family, I had no idea I would encounter such folly. I grew up in Montreal. I love this town. Jews have contributed so much to this city. Up until recently, loving Israel came safely and naturally.

Now, an opposition group is forcing an ignominious motion that is putting an official target and mark of shame on Israel supporters. It’s bad enough when the hostility comes from a random Jew-hater on the street, but from a party in the municipal government? Isn’t City Hall supposed to protect us?

The mark of shame belongs on Projet Montreal.

Its motion asks the council to essentially demonize Israel– to recognize and denounce an “apartheid regime” and declare that a “genocide” is being perpetrated, and to suspend ties with the Israeli government, “its institutions” and “its municipalities.”

Never mind that the “genocide” accusation is being exposed by experts as the lie of the century; or the fact that Arabs have more rights in Israel than in any Arab country, making an “apartheid” claim absurd.

Like any country, Israel gets plenty of criticism (much of it inside Israel). But this initiative has nothing to do with criticism. It’s about singling out one country for radical sanctions.

From what I understand, the mayor, reading the political winds, has been negotiating to “soften” the language. But there’s no softening the breaking of “institutional ties” with one and only one country.

The community, as expected, is doing what it can to fight back.

Among the protests, an open letter from almost 50 Montreal lawyers questioned “whether the proposed measure falls within the powers conferred on the city by the provincial legislature,” noting that “city councils do not determine international law.” Of course they don’t.

A council is there to fix potholes, not the world’s most intractable conflict.

A local Jewish official told me the community needs to do a better job of mobilizing allies and make the case that this motion is bad for the city. Would it make a difference? We don’t know.

Here’s what I know: Projet Montreal needs to hear that its pathological obsession with Israel is not just hateful, dangerous and discriminatory.

It’s creepy.

It’s shameful.

It’s morally bankrupt.

And, however the vote goes on Monday, it’s already a stain on the city.

Update: A watered-down version of the motion passed that expressed solidarity with Palestinians but removed calls to sever ties with Israel.

Israel Derangement Syndrome Hits Montreal City Council Read More »

Creative Community for Peace Calls Mark Ruffalo’s Ellison Attack Antisemitic, Urges Hollywood to Stop Platforming Him

Creative Community for Peace called Mark Ruffalo’s attack on Larry and David Ellison antisemitic on Saturday and urged Hollywood not to platform the actor until he retracts his remarks and apologizes.

“Hollywood should not accept this kind of rhetoric from anyone,” CCFP Executive Director Ari Ingel said in a statement provided to the Jewish Journal. “Mark Ruffalo should retract these remarks and apologize, and nobody in Hollywood should platform him until he does.”

The dispute began after Ruffalo attacked the Ellison family and Paramount Skydance’s proposed $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The actor shared a video of Israeli-American Oracle Executive Vice Chair Safra Catz discussing assistance Oracle provided to Israel after the Hamas-led terrorist attacks of Oct. 7, 2023.

Catz said Oracle possessed “really profoundly scary technology” that the company wanted to make available to the Israeli military.

Ruffalo seized on that phrase, warning that the technology could eventually become part of one of the world’s largest media companies and “one day” be “used on you.” He accused Catz of reveling in what he described as a genocide “built on an apartheid system of oppression powered by Oracle.”

Ruffalo also called Oracle founder Larry Ellison a “classic oligarch” and accused powerful people of “consolidating the wealth of the world for their own power and concentrated dominance.”

Paramount condemned the remarks, saying the use of antisemitic tropes in a business dispute was “a bridge too far.” A company spokesperson said Paramount does not tolerate prejudice “against anyone.”

Ingel argued that Ruffalo’s message crossed the boundary separating legitimate criticism of a corporate transaction from rhetoric historically used to portray Jews as dangerous and secretly powerful.

“Taken together, his statements echo some of the oldest antisemitic conspiracy theories in history,” Ingel said, “depicting Jews as a wealthy and sinister elite who accumulate control over media, money and power, then use that control against society.”

CCFP, an entertainment-industry organization whose open letters and campaigns have attracted thousands of signatures from artists, agents and studio executives, said the latest controversy was part of a longer pattern.

Ingel pointed to Ruffalo’s 2021 accusation that Israel was committing genocide. Ruffalo subsequently apologized for that language, calling it inaccurate, inflammatory and “being used to justify antisemitism here & abroad.”

“For nearly a decade, Ruffalo has supported BDS and campaigns to isolate and demonize Israel,” Ingel said. “Instead of becoming more careful with his words, he has repeatedly doubled down on his extremism.”

In 2025, Ruffalo joined thousands of entertainment figures who signed a Film Workers for Palestine pledge promising not to work with Israeli film institutions the organizers considered complicit in “genocide and apartheid.” The campaign said it targeted institutions rather than individual Israelis. Paramount opposed the pledge, arguing that boycotting Israeli filmmakers would impede dialogue rather than promote peace.

CCFP also accused Ruffalo of amplifying sensational or unsupported casualty claims to his millions of social-media followers.

One claim warned that 14,000 babies in Gaza would die within 48 hours. That figure was initially stated by United Nations humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher. The underlying food-security assessment, however, projected more than 14,000 cases of severe acute malnutrition among children ages six months to five years over approximately a year—not 14,000 deaths within two days.

CCFP further alleged that Ruffalo circulated a claim that the Gaza death toll had reached 680,000, including 380,000 children under five. The figure was raised by U.N. Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese, who described it as an estimate advanced by unnamed scholars and acknowledged that it had not been confirmed.

Ruffalo has rejected the accusation that his comments were antisemitic.

“The accusation that I am antisemitic is appalling and fundamentally dishonest,” he wrote Saturday. Ruffalo said criticism of Israel’s prime minister, military-technology contracts and the executives involved should not be equated with hostility toward Jewish people, for whom he said he has “deep love and respect.”

He defended scrutiny of Oracle’s surveillance technology and government contracts, while arguing that the Paramount-Warner merger could threaten editorial independence and eliminate thousands of entertainment-industry jobs.

Ingel responded in the CCFP statement that intent does not erase impact.

“Repeatedly amplifying inflammatory falsehoods and rhetoric that mirrors historic antisemitic tropes helps normalize the violent anti-Jewish hatred we are seeing take hold once again around the world,” he said.

Creative Community for Peace Calls Mark Ruffalo’s Ellison Attack Antisemitic, Urges Hollywood to Stop Platforming Him Read More »