fbpx

February 23, 2025

How Trump Lost the Plot on Russia

Trump’s critics give him too much credit. He’s neither evil nor calculating. He’s an impulsive power monger who’s obsessed with two things: not getting ripped off and closing deals. He got elected in large part because he convinced enough voters that it was high time America stopped getting ripped off, and given that he’s an expert in the field of ripping off, people bought it.

Now his two brutal traits have come together to trigger a looming geopolitical crisis with Russia, Ukraine and the West.

He sees Ukraine as taking $100 billion from America and giving nothing in return except a devastating war that never ends. He sees Europe in much the same way— weak countries that don’t pay their way and depend on America to police the world.

Because his giant ego revolves around making deals, Trump sees the clear aggressor, Russia’s Putin, as someone who can give him the deal he wants—an end to the war. It doesn’t matter if Ukraine and Europe get the shaft. In Trump’s world, the victory is all about ending the war.

But what price glory? When a huge Trump supporter like Mark Levin turns on you, you know something’s off. The Fox News host is not alone. Many conservatives, including prominent thinkers like Douglas Murray, have expressed alarm at the moral inversion of turning against Ukraine.

In any case, Trump’s irresponsible embrace of the Russian tyrant is leading his country into a moral abyss and an abandonment of what has made America great.

That America was described heroically by President Ronald Reagan in France on June 6, 1984:

“The men of Normandy had faith that what they were doing was right, faith that they fought for all humanity,” Reagan said. “It was the deep knowledge that there is a profound, moral difference between the use of force for liberation and the use of force for conquest. The strength of America’s allies is vital to the United States, and the American security guarantee is essential to the continued freedom of Europe’s democracies.”

That kind of grand historical reflection does not mix well with Trump’s craving for quick results. Because he can’t see beyond his restless need to make a deal, he ends up treating evil dictators like allies and aspiring democracies like annoyances.

Ironically, there is a place for Trump’s instinctive worldview, but only if handled responsibly and judiciously, which is hardly his thing.

“The global position of the US after 1945, and then after 1989, is over and never coming back,” Andrew Sullivan writes on his Substack. “And so a retrenchment of the US position was inevitable at some point: a more judicious approach to interventionism, a greater balance with the allies, a pivot toward Asia and away from Europe and the Middle East: responsible, realist re-positioning.”

Sullivan concedes Trump is right that “the Ukraine conflict is at a stalemate; the human toll is vast, unimaginable, and mounting every day; there’s no chance of repelling Russia from its current occupation.”

But Trump is too impatient to drive the hard bargain Sullivan says would “ensure a stable, new border and an independent Ukraine, with security guarantees against any future invasions from Russia.” Instead, Trump is barreling towards a deal where “the Russians get American sanctions lifted, re-entry to the G-7, vast new oil revenues, and a chance to take all of Ukraine next time.”

So far, we have no idea if Trump is asking Putin for any concessions. As Abe Greenwald writes in Commentary, “Are there any Russian-held areas that Putin is being asked to give up? And at the very least, can we demand the release of the thousands of Ukrainian prisoners of war taken illegally by Russia? How about freeing the estimated 20,000 Ukrainian children who have been kidnapped and reprogrammed as Russian soldiers? Or can we get a promise that Putin will release some of the Russian political prisoners who’ve been sentenced to decades in jail for speaking out against the invasion? We’ve heard nothing.”

In a pessimistic scenario, it’s possible to draw a line from Trump’s coddling of Putin to a corrosion of the very foundations of the West.

“By the West,” Sullivan writes, “I mean the idea that the democracies that beat the Nazis and outlasted the Soviets were and are instinctively America’s friends…that the world is divided between autocracy and democracy, and that although we need to deal with tyrants realistically, and accept limits on our power in this new multipolar world, we are still emphatically the leader of ‘the free world.’”

Trump can’t quite grasp big ideas like the “free world.” He’s more comfortable with a transactional world where “nothing is free” and if you want anything from America, it’s gonna cost you.

“Make America Great Again” was always conditional on the meaning of great. Trump never told us it didn’t include maintaining America’s global leadership as a champion of freedom.

Of course, it’s always possible that a lucky and improvising Trump will somehow find a fair and enduring deal to end a horrible war. We should all hope for that.

But if our impulsive dealmaker-in-chief continues on his current track to elevate evil countries like Russia to make them great again, more and more of his voters will indeed feel they got ripped off.

How Trump Lost the Plot on Russia Read More »

The Cool Jews Who Take the Palestinian Side

Have you noticed the surge of condemnations even among Palestinian voices over the sheer cruelty of Hamas murdering the Bibas boys, including a baby, with their bare hands and showing off their caskets? Why should we be surprised? This depravity went so deep it transcended all boundaries of decency and ideology.

Alas, of course, I’m lying. There were no such condemnations.

Even the mainstream media played down the cruelty. As Rachel O’Donoghue reported in JPost, “Mainstream media outlets barely acknowledged the sheer depravity…offering only the most muted references to the macabre show.”

This is in keeping with a historic pattern where much of the world, including international bodies like the United Nations, take the Palestinian side while singling out Israel for condemnations that violate all standards of fairness.

When I remind friends on the left that the UN has condemned Israel more than all other nations combined, they roll their eyes, as if to say: “Duh. Everyone knows that.”

But luckily for Palestinians, in addition to being arguably the most coddled and celebrated victims on the planet, they’ve been blessed to have yet another major group on their side: Leftist Jews in America.

For many of these chronic critics, nothing gives them the goosebumps like caring for the stranger– in this case, the Palestinians. This is true regardless of any extenuating circumstances, like, say, Palestinian cruelty.

Indeed, as I noted recently in a separate column, on Feb. 13, while Hamas was celebrating its torture of Israeli hostages, 350 liberal rabbis chose another outrage for their full-page ad in The New York Times: President Trump’s plan to rebuild Gaza. The ad read, in full: “Trump has called for the removal of all Palestinians from Gaza. Jewish people say NO to ethnic cleansing!”

As I wrote: “There was no mention of the Oct. 7 Hamas massacre of 1200 Israelis, or that Palestinians were living in misery under the thumb of Hamas… Suddenly, rabbis who pride themselves on recognizing complexity became narrow, context-free, one-sided bashers on behalf of Palestinians.”

These Jews were doing what makes them feel good. They were taking the other side. They were proudly living on that higher plane of speaking up for non-Jews. Compared to that morally superior place, Jews who like to defend their own people are reduced to primal, predictable partisans.

In America, caring for Palestinians makes you a cool Jew. After all, isn’t it a sign of bravery and integrity to take the side of the group you were not born into? If I’m a Jew who defends Israel, how does that make me any different than an Angeleno who’s a diehard Lakers fan?

Jews defending Jews, even in a Jew-hating world, is boring and predictable. Cool Jews who defend Palestinians have always enjoyed rubbing that in and giving other Jews a guilt trip. How dare you be so uncaring about the other side? Aren’t you ashamed of being so tribal?  

It’s not that tribal Jews never criticize Israel or that cool Jews never say anything good about Israel. It’s just that when cool Jews do say something good about Israel, it’s usually tinged with the anguish of “tough love” and the proverbial “but” that lets them unleash their real message: how much they care for Palestinians and how un-tribal they are.

Let us acknowledge, however, that there is one key area where cool Jews are intensely tribal and predictable: politics.

Just as primal Jews will defend Israel with the passion of Lakers fans, cool Jews will defend their political party with the ferocity of a mother bear fighting for her cub.

Just as primal Jews focus on bashing Hamas for their cruelty, cool Jews prefer bashing Republicans for destroying America.

If primal Jews are ambivalent about piling on publicly against Israel, cool Jews have no such ambivalence. They will never bash their party in public, lest it helps the “Hitler” on the other side.

Cool Jews, in short, will bash their own only when it comes to Israel. When it’s about defending their political tribe, they become just as primal as any primate.

Their favorite term is “Jewish values.” From defending Palestinians to supporting their party to bashing Israel to hating on Republicans, it all falls under that rubric. “Jewish values” is the moral analgesic that makes them feel good about everything they do.

Evidently, it hasn’t occurred to these Jews that when so much of the world is already against your people, sticking up for them without any “buts” is also a great Jewish value– assuming, of course, that you can handle being uncool.

The Cool Jews Who Take the Palestinian Side Read More »

Justifying Kidnapping Babies & Nurses’ Murder Fantasies: The Growing Global Moral Rot

On October 7, 2023, I, along with almost all Israelis and most of the Jewish world outside of Israel, watched with a special horror the kidnapping by Hamas-led Gazan civilians of the Bibas family, and in particular the look of sheer terror on the face of 32 year-old Shiri Bibas as she and her children, Ariel (age 4) and nine-month-old Kfir, were being forced at gunpoint into a car – as Hamas cameras proudly documented this heinous crime.

The look on Shiri’s face and the beautiful innocent faces of the Bibas babies will forever be etched in my mind and in the mind of every Israeli. As we were wrestling with the grief and anger we felt over the “Go-Pro” documented and live-streamed brutality and massacres on October 7th, and as we were still learning about friends and family immediately impacted by Hamas’s invasion, our hearts especially broke for Shiri and her babies.

After all, who wouldn’t be moved by a mother’s plainly unadulterated fear over her and her children being kidnapped at gunpoint by an openly genocidal terrorist group?

Who could look at the faces of a 4-year-old and a nine-month-old with the knowledge that they were kidnapped by a terrorist group and not feel sympathy for the babies and revulsion for their kidnappers?

Turns out, a lot of people. The day after October 7th we saw people all over the world, including in many of the largest cities in the free world, celebrating Hamas’s invasion and cold-blooded murder, mass-rapes and mass-kidnappings. In the weeks and months following October 7th our social media feeds and electronic in-boxes were inundated with videos of people in cities like NY, Toronto, London, Miami, etc. tearing down the hostage posters of the Bibas babies and decrying the posters as “Zionist propaganda.” In the weeks and months following October 7th our social media feeds and electronic in-boxes were filled with videos of people rationalizing the murder and kidnapping of babies or even denying it ever happened.

Even now, after Hamas has just purported to return, in a macabre ceremony, the bodies of 4 murdered hostages, including the Bibas babies, we see people throughout the western world – and not “only” those living under Arab dictatorships – justifying, rationalizing, or excusing the kidnapping and murder of BABIES.

We even see people in the West celebrating the reported murder of the Bibas babies and their mom, like in the case of this apparent property manager from Vancouver:

We hear the rationalizations. The “context” of “occupation” is invoked to excuse an Islamist Supremacist terrorist army’s mass-murder, mass-rape, and mass-kidnapping—including of babies. This, despite Gaza not being “occupied” since 2005, and Islamist Supremacists, like Hamas, having massacred Jews for centuries, including in both Ottoman and British controlled Palestine.

Anywhere else, kidnapping babies and massacring families would be universally condemned—except when the victims are Jewish Israelis. Then, excuses and rationalizations abound.

This same double standard emerged in Australia after a viral video featured two Muslim nurses telling an Israeli they wouldn’t treat Israelis, that they would kill Israelis if they came to their hospital, and had already “sent to Jahannam” (Hell) Israeli patients. One would expect universal outrage over healthcare workers threatening to murder patients based on nationality. If nurses in the West refused to treat Chinese nationals over the Chinese government’s actions, would anyone defend them?

Of course not. But when Israeli Jews are the targets, justifications and excuses follow. Within a week, 50 prominent Muslim groups in Australia defended the nurses, portraying them as victims.

Just like with Hamas’s kidnappings, these groups claimed “context” justified nurses bragging about murdering and wanting to murder Israelis. These groups dismissed concerns from Australian politicians as “hyperbolic.”

The moral rot behind those justifying baby kidnappings and nurses’ murder fantasies all come from the same source, the world’s oldest bigotry—antisemitism.

It’s the antisemitism that singularly demonizes the Jewish state while ignoring murderous tyrannies all over the world that are responsible for millions of deaths. It’s the antisemitism that dehumanizes Jewish Israelis and paints those who murder or fantasize about murdering them as the victims.

In the 1930s, this moral rot led to catastrophe for the nations that embraced it.

This moral rot also led to incredible disaster for the entire world in the last century. In this century, we better learn from our past quick, and have zero tolerance for the antisemitism that leads to people justifying kidnapping babies or Israeli murder-fantasies by healthcare workers … lest our past become our future.


Micha Danzig served in the Israeli Army and is a former police officer with the NYPD. He is currently an attorney and is very active with numerous Jewish and pro-Israel organizations, including Stand With Us and the FIDF, and is a national board member of Herut North America.

Justifying Kidnapping Babies & Nurses’ Murder Fantasies: The Growing Global Moral Rot Read More »

“Mar-a-Gaza” vs. Hamas Inc

The staged spectacle this past week of the return of the remains of the Bibas children, Ariel and Kfir, kidnapped by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023, and a deliberately stage-managed kiss by a hostage on a Hamas fighter’s forehead, brought into sharp relief the enormous risks behind President Donald Trump’s outlandish “Mar-a-Gaza” proposal. He proposed to evict all Palestinians–ostensibly including the Hamas fighters involved in the production–and build beachfront property out of the rubble of Hamas’ war with Israel in Gaza. 

Trump floated the idea two weeks ago at a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and he was globally panned by leaders, including from the Middle East, who would have to accept these Palestinians. 

Astute as a marketing man, there is one element Trump isn’t acknowledging—evident in the latest propaganda orchestrated by militants in Gaza in recent days: the Hamas brand has survived the war, literally rising even stronger than before out of sheer rubble. 

The Israeli government finally responded to the outrageous show of force by Hamas by putting a hold on the release of more militants in exchange for more hostages unless Hamas ends the shaming productions of the propaganda-filled hostage releases. Why Netanyahu didn’t put a stop to it sooner should be a question posed by the public once the investigations into the Oct. 7 massacre begins. But Hamas’s strategy puts Trump’s “Mar-a-Gaza” travesty of a plan and its consequences into sharp relief. 

Under Trump’s vision,  the U.S. would be involved in forcibly moving Palestinians in Gaza to a motley crew of Arab countries that Trump would bully, pressure or bribe. Then, the U.S. and Israel would turn Gaza into a high-end resort. The idea reportedly emerged after Trump’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, returned from a fact-finding mission, showed Trump photos of Israel’s devastation of Gaza and told him that the area has been leveled and that it is unlivable. 

“It is the buildings that could tip over at any moment. There’s no utilities there whatsoever, no working water, electric, gas, nothing. God knows what kind of disease might be festering there,” Witkoff told reporters in a briefing after the Trump-Netanyahu news conference.

As a journalist and brand positioning strategist who has covered terrorism as a former correspondent for NPR and U.S. News and World Report, I’ve studied the prolific news footage of Hamas’s highly choreographed release of Israeli hostages and can see that Trump, Witkoff and also the media, fail to see a disturbingly strong Hamas Inc. brand not only “festering” in the rubble but surviving and thriving. Netanyahu may have pulled off a devastating refashioning of Gaza real estate by demolishing a large percentage of homes. But he appears to have done little to truly diminish Hamas’ capacity. The proverbial Phoenix has risen from the rubble. 

The videos show troubling trends of a violently resurgent and triumphant Hamas, which has used the Israeli massacre it instigated on Oct. 7, to become immensely sophisticated at propaganda. They convey a cohesive, synchronized and choreographed narrative. And the message is clear: “We are strong, we have survived, we will prevail.” 

Asra Nomani, editor of a non-profit, the Pearl Project for investigative reporting, has studied the role of Islamist propaganda, misinformation and violent instigation since the 9/11 attacks on America, and she refers to Hamas’ elaborately videographed productions of the Israeli hostage releases as “propaganda porn.”

“Hamas is staging these hostage releases as public relations stunts with well-scripted, choreographed theatrical productions in the town square, festively emblazoned with Hamas flags and banners,” Nomani observes. “They use sophisticated hand-held and drone-operated cameras, shooting these ‘events’ from multiple angles.” Set and wardrobe managers dress the militants in identical camo fatigues and face masks and matching green balaclavas.”

Nomani likens this elaborate stage and intentional backdrop to those of classic grip-and-grin photos you would see at the Oscars or Academy Awards. “They blare music in the background as they parade the hostages on stage and hand them pre-printed certificates and pre-packaged gift bags with stage commands on when to wave and say, ‘Thank you,’” says Nomani. “They’re deploying strategic humiliation to an art form. The hostages have a final word of courage in their departure from custody but Hamas leaves its imprint with its trademark upside-down red triangle as its brand logo for death and destruction.”

Hamas laid the groundwork for its powerful propaganda strategy years before the Oct. 7 attacks, when the militant group built tunnels for most of its operations under homes, schools, hospitals and other critical infrastructure in Gaza. 

They knew that every time an Israeli explosive landed on one of those targets to destroy the tunnels, their time bomb for “propaganda porn” would also go off when innocents were killed. Israel couldn’t adequately defend itself against that type of offensive weapon. “Israel lost the PR battle worldwide and, with it, their moral high ground,” Nomani says. “Hamas has cast Israelis and Jews as the villains when, in fact, they instigated Oct. 7 and is now reaping tens of millions of dollars in propaganda value and earned media,” or the free coverage that would cost companies a lot in paid ads.

As a strategic advisor and executive coach to CEOs and leaders, I always urge my clients to read the subtext and not ignore the obvious. That applies here, too. 

In the rubble, Hamas Inc. has built a hidden logistical infrastructure to support these militants, reflected in the terrorists’ crisp-pressed uniforms and polished belt buckles, with berets angled just so. There are buildings where someone is washing, drying and ironing their uniforms. Unlike the tired, emaciated Israeli hostages, many of whom have subsisted on one pita bread a day, Hamas soldiers look well-fed, strong and energized, able to meet, organize, plan and fight. 

And clearly, they’re well-rested. Somewhere, they sleep while Israeli families pace and grieve. Somehow, food supplies are getting through. In hidden kitchens, someone cooks vast quantities of food daily to nourish these militants in support of the movement. There are storage facilities still untouched that house the guns, cameras, drones, explosives, uniforms, cell phones and other communications devices and propaganda, including the militant flags and “released by Hamas” certificates issued to the Israeli hostages, along with the criminally offensive gift bags. 

The bottom line is that when reporters do their standups or ask questions of Trump, Witkoff, Netanyahu, et. al.,  they need to ask, “Have you looked past the rubble?” 

On Feb. 17, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce lauded Trump for his speed in tackling two major global crises, Israel and Ukraine. “It’s a unique situation, involving unique men, and certainly as we’ve already seen with President Trump and this administration, things that maybe normally would take six months or a year or two years are taking a matter of weeks,” she told reporters in the Saudi capital, Riyadh, on the eve of U.S.-Russia talks to end the Ukraine war. 

One of my former bosses once gave me wise advice that I always pass along to my coaching clients. “Your biggest strength,” he said, “can also be your biggest weakness.” That’s playing out now with Trump in Gaza.  

Right now, one could argue that Hamas is primarily an Israeli problem. In his haste to be seen as a rapid history-making problem-solver, Trump could arm-twist key Mideast countries like Jordan and Egypt to accept civilian Palestinians. 

But there would be no way to identify and exclude militant Hamas in this transfer. If Mar-a-Gaza is to undergo development, all Palestinians would have to be removed to clear the debris and rebuild. This would include militants in the Hamas Inc. empire. Then we should all worry. That would mean that, with the help of the U.S. and Israeli military, Trump would be exporting to other countries Hamas Inc. terrorists, who will undoubtedly instigate violence, hostage-taking and propaganda porn around the world. 

There are no tariffs that Trump could impose to stop the long-term consequences of the global expansion of Hamas Inc. 


Chitra Ragavan is an executive leadership coach and strategic adviser to CEOs and thought leaders. She is the creator of a seven-step leadership coaching program, Positive Instigation: Leading with Power, Passion and Principles. Chitra has served as a national correspondent for NPR and U.S. News & World Report and contributes to The Hill, Psychology Today, the Daily Beast, Newsweek and the women’s digital platform SWAAY. She hosts the podcast When It Mattered, exploring pivotal moments that shape leaders’ lives and work.

“Mar-a-Gaza” vs. Hamas Inc Read More »