fbpx

September 8, 2023

Regret and Remorse; Shabbat Thought – Points of Return

Two parts:

— Preface to Shabbat Thought – Regret and Renewal – Thought on the Shabbat Before Rosh HaShanah

 

— Shabbat Thought – “Points of Return” Thoughts Before Rosh HaShanah – see below

Regret and Renewal

 

Preview of Teachings for Shabbat morning

Of the many themes of Rosh HaShanah (the Jewish New Year), forgiveness and regret are two of the most notable. As you have heard me teach of the past few weeks, interpersonal forgiveness is a very complex idea. There is little agreement among theologians, psychologists, and philosophers on what forgiveness is and how it operates in the life of a human beings. God’s forgiveness (and forgiving God, in some cases), can be even more complex. For this reason, I have chosen to use the phrase “working through hurts and wrongs with another person” instead of “forgiveness” because, whatever the word means, forgiveness is a process and operates in stages.

 

Regret and remorse are on the other side of hurts and wrongs. If we have hurt or wronged someone, we ought to feel some degree of regret and remorse as a prerequisite to working through. I have seen people who have wronged others say, “Can we just drop this?” That might be an excellent idea, but it not an admission of wronging, nor does such a phrase imply regret. The offended person might say, “Yes, let’s drop it,” because they know they will never get an apology. (Does agreeing to drop something mean that one has forgiven others? I’m not sure about that).

 

In addition to regretting wrongs, we can regret decisions we’ve made, even unconscious ones. We can regret the way we have behaved, even if no actual wrong was committed. Regretting things is a way to face yourself through facing past actions. If we regret something, it means that we have the potential to change. I think we ought to work through regret enough that we feel we are a different person. We can’t undo the past, but we can transform for the sake of the future.

 

On the other hand, there is a sense in our mystical tradition that regret and remorse can change the spiritual valence of the past when we become a different person. “Different” here means that if you were back in the same place, you would have acted differently. Life lived in time typically does not give us “re-do’s”, but in the life of spirit, we can repair the past.

 

This Shabbat morning, the Shabbat before Rosh HaShanah, I would like to end my thoughts for the month of Elul (the Hebrew month before Rosh Shanah) by looking at regret and remorse as acts of repair and renewal.

 

Shabbat Thought

Points of Return

Thoughts on the Shabbat Before Rosh HaShanah (coinciding with Parshat Nitzavim – Vayeilech 2023)

 

Every moment in time is a point of no return, no turning back the clock. And every moment in time is a time of teshuvah, a time of return. Teshuvah, turning, return, is a core theme of our Days of Awe, and carries several different meanings. Teshuvah can mean trying to repair harm done to others. Teshuvah can mean turning our life’s path to a path of truth and goodness. Teshuvah can mean repairing the harm we have done to our own souls. Each of these meanings is crucial for our spiritual growth. In these brief words for the Shabbat before Rosh HaShanah (occurring next Shabbat, September 15-16), I would like to focus on the first meaning of Teshuvah.

 

Teshuvah, at its most simple and perhaps most difficult level, means working through harm we have done to other people. In the default position of many people, they don’t know what they have done, they won’t admit what they have done, or they don’t take seriously what they have done. Many people have reasons and justifications for hurting others.

 

If we caused harm to another, including emotional harm, we must apologize. First, we have to discuss with the other person what happened. You (or they) might not remember, or might not agree on the facts. We have to work toward setting out what happened.

 

We must say what we did and not offer excuses. We can ask if the other person wants an explanation (not an excuse). They might not want it. We ask how we can repair. Usually an apology is enough.

 

Your apologizing does not mean that things necessarily go back to how they were. The other person might want to avoid you or to downgrade the relationship. The acceptance of an apology does not mean the hurt is gone.

 

In the case of someone who does not know they have needlessly caused harm, we are duty bound to inform them, and not allow ourselves to bear resentment and grudges. In Jewish law, the aggrieved party is morally obligated to admonish those who have hurt us. If we don’t admonish them, we are complicit in their wrongdoing.  We are ethically obligated to give others the opportunity to apologize and try to repair the harm.

 

The process of admonishing includes going over the facts of what happened. One often discovers that people don’t agree on what happened. Admonishing someone for something they don’t agree they did, will probably only lead to an argument.

 

The basic agreement on the facts includes what exactly the wrong was. Never, ever say “I’m sorry you feel that way.”  We do not apologize for the feelings of other people.  We apologize for what we did.

 

We are further obligated to admonish people, when necessary, in a way that allows them to feel remorse and apologize. We must not admonish with anger and condemnation. We are called on to reason carefully with others.

 

It often happens that when we prepare ourselves to reason with others, or in the course of that reasoning with others, we discover our part in whatever went wrong. Reasoned admonishing can be an act of discovery. In the course of admonishing another person, when we are working through establishing what exactly happened, we will hear their side, their experience of us. We might find that we, the aggrieved person, had our own part in what happened. I believe that one hidden reason we are morally obligated to admonish others is that we find out we might have trouble admitting what we have done. We tend to blame others in order to avoid looking at ourselves. In giving another person the opportunity to do teshuvah, we discover our own obligation to do our own teshuvah.

 

Shared responsibility does not divide up the moral obligation. Every person is 100% responsible for their part.

 

Once we realize that we have committed a wrong, we must confess in our hearts as truthfully as possible. One of the deepest parts of the Days of Awe is the process of confession, a conscious, sincere, and deliberate process of being morally accountable. We often find various ways to avoid sincerity.  Defending ourselves by saying “I know I’m no angel” and “I’m not saying I’m perfect” are ways to avoid saying, simply, “I did something wrong.” Confessing wrongdoing obliterates the stiff defensiveness of the ego-self.

 

To engage truly in the process of teshuvah, unrelenting, courageous, and honest insight into the inner self is required. In Chasidic thought, there is special attention on hidden motivations. The patterns in the unconscious ego-self seem to conspire to create lives of inauthenticity.

 

I think if we do teshuvah correctly, we can feel distinctly uncomfortable in our own skins for a period of time. Achieving anything worthwhile always involves some suffering. Our goal during these Days of Awe is to inflict upon ourselves a kind of spiritual pain, labor pains, if you will, that gives birth to a truer version of ourselves.

 

To put this in terms of Chasidic thought, we aim to break through the husk of inauthenticity, of not being morally accountable, of not courageously gaining insight into ourselves. We break through that husk in order to release a spark of truth and life. The sparks accumulate to repair the vessels of the Divine Heart. As the Chasidic tradition teaches, as we repair ourselves, we repair God.

 

The teshuvah of working to repair things between us and others is the first and constant step.

Regret and Remorse; Shabbat Thought – Points of Return Read More »

Mahmoud Abbas

Abbas Slammed for Saying European Jews Aren’t Semites, Hitler Killed Jews Over “Usury and Money”

Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas is getting slammed for an August 24 speech where he reportedly claimed that “European Jews are not Semites” and that Adolf Hitler murdered Jews over “usury and money.”

Abbas’ speech before the Fatah Revolutionary Council, translated by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), featured Abbas saying: “The truth that we should clarify to the world is that European Jews are not Semites. They have nothing to do with Semitism.” He then alleged that Ashkenazi Jews are actually the descendants of Khazars, which The Times of Israel (TOI) described as “an ancient Turkish people” and that the theory that these people subsequently converted to Judaism is “discredited.”

The PA president proceeded to claim “that [the Europeans] fought [the Jews] because of their social role, and not their religion. Several authors wrote about this. Even Karl Marx said this was not true. He said that the enmity was not directed at Judaism as a religion, but to Judaism for its social role.” Abbas then alleged that Hitler “said he fought the Jews because they were dealing with usury and money. In his view, they were engaged in sabotage, and this is why he hated them. We just want to make this point clear. This was not about Semitism and antisemitism.”

Jewish groups, politicians and government officials alike roundly condemned Abbas over these remarks.

“I am appalled by President Abbas’ hateful, antisemitic remarks at a recent Fatah meeting,” Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism Deborah Lipstadt posted on X, formerly known as Twitter. “The speech maligned the Jewish people, distorted the Holocaust, and misrepresented the tragic exodus of Jews from Arab countries. I condemn these statements and urge an immediate apology.”

“The so-called ‘moderate’ Mahmoud Abbas denies the antisemitism of Adolf Hitler, falsely claiming that Hitler ‘fought the Jews because they were dealing with usury and money,’” Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY) posted on X. “With ‘moderates’ like these, who needs extremists? There is and has long been a deep rot of antisemitism at the core of Mahmoud Abbas, whose Jew-hatred and corruption have only served to perpetuate the suffering of his own people while lining his own pockets. Abbas is a moral disgrace.”

The European Union (EU) also called Abbas’ statement “false and grossly misleading.” “Such historical distortions are inflammatory, deeply offensive, can only serve to exacerbate tensions in the region and serve no-one’s interests,” the EU said in a statement. “They play into the hands of those who do not want a two-state solution, which President Abbas has repeatedly advocated for. Moreover, they trivialize Holocaust and thereby fuel anti-Semitism and are an insult to the millions of victims of the Holocaust and their families. The European Union remains committed to combating antisemitism and racism in all its forms and will continue to strongly oppose any attempt to condone, justify or trivialise the Holocaust.”

Anti-Defamation League (ADL) CEO Jonathan Greenblatt similarly posted on X, “It’s truly outrageous how many antisemitic tropes President Abbas managed to jam into a single statement. Not only is it unacceptable for him personally, but as a leader, it sends a message to the Palestinian people that this hate is legitimate. Abbas should immediately apologize for his antisemitic and Holocaust revisionism comments.”

Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Gilad Erdan posted on X, “Nearly two years ago the UN adopted a resolution I initiated to combat Holocaust denial and distortion. Yet shamefully, in two weeks, President Abbas, a man who publicly blames the Jews for the Holocaust – the ultimate form of Holocaust denial – will take the stage in the very same room this resolution was adopted. What a disgrace! Where is the outcry?! Where are the UN condemnations?! Where is the media?! The hypocrisy and double standards truly know no bounds. Abbas’ dangerous hate and lies must be condemned!”

StandWithUs Israel Executive Director Michael Dickson posted on X, “Mahmoud Abbas has consistently minimized and denied the Holocaust: the unprecedented genocide of the Jewish People. He *literally* wrote a thesis in Holocaust denial, published as a book, which blames Jews for their own murder. “

The Simon Wiesenthal Center also posted on X, “The next generation of Palestinian leaders – including those who want Abbas as president-for-life – are watching to see if this #Antisemitic outburst carries any ramifications. It does for Jewish people inside and outside Israel.”

Stop Antisemitism called Abbas’ remarks “absolute insanity.” “Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas distorts Holocaust, invokes white supremacist Khazar theory, says [Middle East and North Africa] Jews did not want to leave their Arabic countries of residence but were forced by Israel,” they posted on X.

Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish American Organizations Chair Harriet Schleifer and CEO William Daroff said in a statement, “We join in the rightful condemnation from the United States, Europe, and the broader international community of President Abbas for his heinous victim-blaming of Jews for the Shoah and parroting the false and antisemitic Khazar origin canard. Abbas’ false characterizations of Jews are part of a longstanding pattern of behavior dating back to his PhD dissertation on Holocaust denial. He continues his unrelenting quest to deny any Jewish ties to our ancestral homeland in an effort to attempt to delegitimize the State of Israel.” They added: “Palestinians deserve leadership that is serious about meaningful engagement with the international community and negotiating peace. President Abbas, who is in his 18th year of a 5-year term of office, should be roundly condemned for continuing to incite terrorism, his flagrant despotism, and his recent antisemitic remarks. The international community should question his fitness to rule and his commitment to a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Should Abbas travel to New York for the upcoming 78th UN General Assembly, we urge UN and world leaders to call him to task for spewing antisemitic hate.”

J Street also denounced Abbas’ remarks. “There is no possible excuse for making antisemitic statements like these, and it is by no means President Abbas’s first offense,” they said in a statement. “When he has expressed similar sentiments in the past, J Street has called on him to swiftly retract and apologize for making them — and we do so again now. Maligning the Jewish people with these ugly tropes is an absolute moral wrong that endangers our community around the world and exacerbates distrust and conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. These remarks are particularly disappointing to J Street and its leadership, which has always engaged — and urged others to engage — with the President as a potential partner in efforts to find a path to resolving the conflict. Comments like these undermine that basis for that hope and are personally, deeply hurtful.”

AIPAC confronted J Street over their statement. “What’s missing? Any call for Congress or Biden to hold Abbas accountable,” AIPAC posted on X. “J Street consistently demands that America’s leaders pressure Israel. Yet it shields Abbas from pressure as he poisons the well for peace.   @jstreetdotorg is many things, but it’s not pro-Israel.”

Abbas Slammed for Saying European Jews Aren’t Semites, Hitler Killed Jews Over “Usury and Money” Read More »