fbpx

March 21, 2022

In Memory of Aliza Ben-Tal

It is with great sadness that we mark the passing of Aliza Ben-Tal, née Lisa Fromson, who passed away on March 14, 2022 in Tel Aviv, Israel after a long battle with cancer.

Aliza was a lifelong Zionist who fulfilled her dream by moving from her native Los Angeles to Kibbutz Mashabe Sade in the Negev as part of a youth movement. She lived on the kibbutz for 28 years.

Aliza was a proud Los Angeles native, grew up as a member of the University Synagogue and graduated from Pacific Palisades High School.

Her career in Israel was launched while she was still a student of social work at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (BGU), and she was named student union representative to the Board of Governors. Her passion for the university became her vocation. Aliza worked for many years as the university liaison to the Board as well as special assistant to the President for International Affairs, deftly stewarding relationships with some of the University’s most cherished supporters from around the world. During the past decade, she worked as an Associate Producer and freelance consultant for EVA Productions of Paris, helping to produce a number of important documentaries.

Her life was particularly shaped by her father Murray Fromson’s rich career as a journalist. As a child, Aliza grew up not only in LA, but also traveled to and lived in other far-flung locations where her father covered the stories of the day in Vietnam, Russia and across the U.S. After her father’s retirement, Aliza facilitated her family’s sponsorship of an annual media mission in Murray Fromson’s name, bringing journalists to Israel and BGU to learn about the latest social and technological developments happening there.

Later in her life, Aliza made a move north—from southern Israel to Tel Aviv—determined to experience Israel’s rich cultural offerings with her wide circle of friends, despite the health issues that developed after she moved there. She became a virtual tour guide and cheerleader for Israel online as well, with a vast following on Facebook where she posted lively, insightful and well-researched posts about Israel, world events and political developments. She was also passionate about promoting peace and social justice.

Aliza is survived by her beloved mother, Dodi Fromson, brother Derek Fromson and his wife Ileana and their two children Isabella and Eric, and countless friends and relatives around the world.

Donations in memory of Aliza Ben-Tal/Lisa Fromson, will be directed to the Research Fund of Professor Nir Peled, Director of Oncology in Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem.

Israel: www.szmc.org.il
U.S.: www.acsz.org

Please note on the form that the donation is in memory of Aliza Ben-Tal.

May her memory be a blessing.

In Memory of Aliza Ben-Tal Read More »

A Spotlight on African Safaris

There are few experiences as exhilarating and life changing as going on safari to Africa. It is not just a vacation; it is a magical and unforgettable experience. You will take something with you when you leave, and some part of you will stay behind. While interest in Safaris have increased in 2022, there is still some hesitancy about being safe “in the wild.” As someone who has spent countless years visiting various spots in Africa, just follow the suggestions and instructions of a professional guide and you will be totally safe. Each Country has different COVID-19 requirements and thorough planning is imperative, however the lodges are super strict about sanitizing and cleanliness.

A bucket list destination.

There is a plethora of reasons a trip to Africa should be not just on your bucket list but number one on that list. There is no shortage of breathtaking moments, tons of adventures to participate in and unrivaled natural beauty. Africa is a huge continent with 54 countries, nine of which are renowned for the best safaris.

The landscapes of Africa are vastly different from one country to another. From the untouched pristine land of Southern Africa with rich vegetation, to the miles and miles of swirling sands and granite rocks of Namibia, or the great plains of the Serengeti. Each is more beautiful than the last. The savannas, woodlands, awe-inspiring mountains, as well as crystal-clear waters are beyond the imagination. Which of these you choose to see (or see first), will depend on your specific interests and taste. Africa will leave you with unforgettable memories of a once-in-a-lifetime adventure, surrounded by unique landscapes and spectacular wildlife. Explore them with me in this three-part series, so that you can make an informed decision when you book your first safari.

All safaris are not created equal.

Each Country, game lodge or tented camp, has a unique appeal and each has its own features and attractions. Many say that The Great Migration in Masai Mara is THE best experience ever and make no mistake, it IS incredible. You will see the largest and most spectacular movement of animals spanning an impressive circular and scenic trek as every year, over a million wildebeest and thousands of gazelles and zebras make their way between Masai Mara and Serengeti National Park.

Others will suggest that you should spend time trekking with the gorillas, and that too is a profound experience. As is the Okavango Delta and the diversity of South Africa; each absolutely unique.

Wild accommodations

Wherever you decide to go, you will have a variety of options when it comes to accommodations and activities such as a self-drive stay in a national public park, or a guided experience in a private reserve with a knowledgeable tour guide.

As you start to plan your safari, you should first decide if you want to disconnect and unwind by a pool with an incredible view surrounded by nature and go on the occasional game drive, or whether you want a more adventurous journey with guided walks and sleepouts in the bush. A romantic night for two in a treehouse with just the sounds of the night is an incredible experience! There really is nothing quite as magical as sleeping under the stars while listening to lions roaring in the distance. It’s almost like living in your own Out of Africa movie scene!

You could also choose to spend time with the local communities or have a hands-on experience with conservation. Accommodation options vary from luxury game lodges, cabins or tented camps and even these vary from utilitarian to luxury. I have stayed in tented camps that are as luxurious as a 5-star hotel and while both have their charms, your choice will depend on your preferences and budget. However, the ultimate experience would be to try both.

Are safaris family-friendly?

Many safari lodges have kid-friendly options but there are some that don’t allow kids under six years old. Some game drives can take up to three or four hours or longer, so if you want to go on a family safari, be sure to take that into consideration. Taking your children with you on safari where they have many learning opportunities about conservation and how other cultures live, is priceless. The guide’s experience ensures that you and your children get a wealth of knowledge about the animals and a chance to spot them in their natural habitat.

Talk to me about the best countries and lodges for a family-friendly safari, where you can fully customize your experience to ensure that everybody has a great time. Consider properties that offer family-friendly activities and animal encounters.

Sustainability-minded

If you decide to go on a guided safari to a private game lodge, choose wisely. Your lodge should promote conservation and sustainable tourism and follow sensitive and ethical wildlife practices, and your guide should be fully trained and experienced. In the next article I will share my experiences of the different areas and lodges starting with East Africa, overland safaris, the migration and gorilla trekking.

The most important aspect of your trip is a professional and reliable DMC and there are two companies in Africa that I put my complete trust in to fulfill every detail of a client’s trip without fail. Meet Bernard of Nziza Hospitality and Sandra Lee of Ruby Travel. Bernard is the owner and manager of Nziza Hospitality with deep roots in Africa and is committed to providing you with value that goes above and beyond. Sandra Lee also has many years of experience in the travel industry and will provide you with a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to experience Africa at its best. These two professionals are true gems in the industry and will work with you to create an unforgettable experience.

Keep following for more adventures in Africa, wine tours all over the world, cruises, river cruises, wedding and honeymoon destinations and much more. If you have any questions about safaris or travel in general, please contact me here.

A Spotlight on African Safaris Read More »

Might Makes Wrong

As a “baby boomer,” born immediately after World War II, I experienced virtually no antisemitism. I attended a public high school that was probably 95% Jewish, so it’s not surprising. At university in the 1960s, it was no secret that I was Jewish, and not only was there no discrimination, but also I was received warmly.

Years later as a young professor at a university about 70 miles away from home, I did meet one openly antisemitic colleague, but the faculty was otherwise welcoming. In fact, it was a Christian dean who asked me to establish a Chair of Jewish Studies, and I had the strong support of everyone on campus.

The situation is very different now. On university campuses in North America and Europe, and in society in general, it is as if someone turned the clock back to my father’s era. It seems as if my life has been a fleeting moment in history.

My father, who also lived through a pandemic in 1918 in which his father died, left a deeply antisemitic Lithuania with the rest of the family in 1930 to settle in a genteel, British-style antisemitic Toronto. In those days, society was equal opportunity racist: Want ads in the Toronto Star read “No Irish need apply” because the Irish were Catholic and the province of Ontario was Protestant.

There was a quota on Jews in the faculty of medicine as there was in professional schools across North America, but it went further than a quota. Jewish graduates were not granted admitting privileges to the hospitals. They had to turn their patients over to Christian doctors. That is the reason there is a Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto and a “Jewish hospital” in major North American cities. Only then could Jewish doctors have admitting privileges.

All of that changed after the full horror of the Holocaust emerged and especially after the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem. That was the period that I experienced. Israel’s rebirth in 1948 was celebrated and confirmed by the United Nations. There was clearly a sense of guilt or shame and everything Jewish became fashionable. But fashions go out of style. I should have known. Six million dead Jews only bought us seventy years of quiet.

Six million dead Jews only bought us seventy years of quiet.

I am not suggesting that history is repeating itself exactly and that we are in the same toxic environment as previous generations. Governments in North America and Europe do not enact antisemitic legislation. In fact, they openly protect Jewish communities. Churches no longer preach vilification of Jews. Evangelical Christians are Israel’s best friends.

But Israel is the most reviled country in the U.N. and Jewish students too often feel the need to hide their Jewish identity at universities in North America.

This shift in the perception of Jews and the Jewish state is a reflection of a deeper malaise in the world. Ominous developments reflect a world returning to conflict. Leaders of the non-democratic nations during this period of upheaval revert to dangerous and destructive behavior. Why does Putin think it’s his mission to re-create the Russian Empire? Doesn’t he know what happened to the last one? Why does Iran believe that it has to destroy Israel to Make Persia Great Again?

Bellicose attitudes have always precipitated crises. The idea that “might makes right” dates back to Aesop’s fables, recast by the 17th-century French writer La Fontaine. His fable of the wolf and the lamb depicts an innocent lamb drinking at the water’s edge when a famished wolf appears and claims all kinds of foul deeds committed by the lamb, “whereupon the wolf dragged him through the forest depths and ate him up without further ado.”

In a Russian version, the wolf goes farther, saying, “Your fault lies in the fact that I’m hungry,” making it clear that the powerful will use any excuse to justify their selfish actions but the truth is that they do it because they can.

Those of us raised in the halcyon days after the war believed that the Enlightenment had finally borne its fruit and that reason would characterize people’s lives and govern the conduct of nations. It would be the end of tribalism and the dawn of a new era. And we had every reason to believe so, with the creation of the European Union and the end of the Cold War.

It was a Utopian dream. And a beautiful and cherished one. But we forgot that “utopia” is Greek for “good place” and “no place,” meaning “nowhere.”

The surest sign of the health of the world and the stability of nations is its treatment of Jews. Whenever challenging times come, societies show the depth of their moral strength or lack of it by their tolerance and compassion. Too often the world has failed the test and inevitably everyone suffers.

The surest sign of the health of the world and the stability of nations is its treatment of Jews.

The reason the Jews are the focus of attention is succinctly summarized by the Globe and Mail columnist Robyn Urback: “Jewish identity is so imprecise, it can be portrayed in all sorts of different ways. Light-skinned Jews aren’t white to Nazis and white supremacists  but are to most in modern society. To the Soviets, Jews were “rootless cosmopolitans” but in America during the Cold War they were suspected of being communists. Today, Urback points out, the Left “sees Jews as powerful capitalists who control financial networks … while antisemites on the Right see Jews as a poisoning influence on a white ethnosphere.” These contradictions “make anti-Semitism the ultimate adaptable prejudice, which has allowed it to thrive across continents for centuries.”

Yet I remain hopeful if not optimistic. We are not destined to repeat the same folly of the past. It is a Jewish belief that Moshiach, the Messiah, will come when the world is either insufferably bad or finally worthy. Let us work toward the latter and hold fast in the belief, as expressed by Martin Luther King Jr., that “the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”


Dr. Paul Socken is Distinguished Professor Emeritus and founder of the Jewish Studies program at the University of Waterloo.

Might Makes Wrong Read More »

Greg Gutfeld Is Mad at Me (About Ukraine and the Holocaust)

Greg Gutfeld is mad at me. Why? Because I compared his conspiracy theory that journalists are exaggerating Ukrainian suffering, to the accusations made during the Holocaust that Jews were exaggerating their suffering. I stand by that comparison, no matter how many times the host of Fox’s highly-rated “Gutfeld!” show calls me to express his displeasure.

When you write articles on controversial issues, you occasionally receive hostile responses from those whom you criticize. An official of the Chinese embassy in Washington once called me to complain about an article in which I urged a boycott of the Beijing Olympics because of Chinese human rights violations. He said he was “instructing” me to stop writing such articles. I suppose in his country, that sort of thing can be intimidating.

A temperamental pundit once accused me of being “un-American” because I criticized the American government, under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, for shutting our country’s doors to most Jewish refugees during the Holocaust. My accuser had a very strange definition of patriotism.

And then there’s Greg Gutfeld, one of Fox’s highest-rated talk-show hosts, who was upset enough at an article I recently wrote for the Jewish Journal that he personally called me.

“I have just one question—why did you f—ing write this?!?,” he asked, in language he would never be allowed to use on “Gutfeld!,” or on “The Five,” which he co-hosts.

But amidst the heated language, Gutfeld inadvertently strengthened my argument, by trotting out yet another conspiracy theory. This had all started because he was angry that I had characterized something he said as a baseless conspiracy theory—and on the telephone with me this week, he alleged a new, and equally baseless conspiracy. There seems to be a theme here.

It all began when Gutfeld remarked, on “The Five” on March 8, that news stories showing the suffering of Ukrainian civilians “have sped up and are accumulating to create a narrative — and they only go in one direction…an image is taken and then played over and over and over again to create some kind of emotional response out of you, because that makes a profit for news companies.”

Gutfeld also suggested that the motive for this supposed conspiracy by the news media is not only profit-seeking but also to unfairly paint Russia as a bully. “The humanitarian crisis could have been prevented” if the media were not presenting the conflict as “a David and Goliath narrative” which could “lead to more suffering,” he asserted.

Unfortunately for Gutfeld, just moments later, Fox News war correspondent Benjamin Hall appeared on the broadcast and said, “Speaking as someone on the ground, I want to say that this is not the media trying to drum up some emotional response… [Ukrainian cities] are being absolutely flattened. It is an absolute catastrophe, and the people caught in the middle are the ones who are really suffering.”

Hall himself is now hospitalized, after suffering serious injuries in a Russian missile attack that killed two of his Fox News colleagues.

Gutfeld’s Ukraine conspiracy theory was reminiscent of how some officials of the Roosevelt administration—including FDR himself—and the British Foreign Office privately accused Jewish groups and other refugee advocates of conspiring to “exaggerate” Jewish suffering during the Holocaust, in order to gain sympathy. President Roosevelt once dismissed Jewish complaints as “sob stuff.”

Gutfeld’s Ukraine conspiracy theory was reminiscent of how some officials of the Roosevelt administration—including FDR himself—and the British Foreign Office privately accused Jewish groups and other refugee advocates of conspiring to “exaggerate” Jewish suffering during the Holocaust, in order to gain sympathy.

My comparison between Gutfeld’s conspiracy theory and the Holocaust-era conspiracy accusations is valid. Not because the Russian invasion of Ukraine is comparable to the genocide of the Holocaust; it’s not. The analogy is legitimate because in both cases, the victims or their supporters were falsely accused of conspiring to do something which they didn’t do.

Gutfeld’s conspiracy-mongering didn’t end with his March 8 remarks. He added a new layer in his phone call to me this week. At one point in his tirade, he said, “You were asked to write this attack on me! You were asked to write it!” I replied, “Asked? By whom?” But it was nearly impossible to get a word in edgewise, and he steamrolled right past my question without ever explaining who it is, exactly, that he thinks was the nefarious secret hand behind my criticism of his statements.

Of course, nobody “asked” me to write that article, or this one. My criticism of Gutfeld’s remarks is not part of some conspiracy against him. But it says something about his view of the world that not only does he think journalists are conspiring to misrepresent events in Ukraine, but he also seems to believe that if somebody criticizes his conspiracy theory then the critic himself must be part of some additional conspiracy.

Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, the most prominent American Jewish leader in the 1930s and 1940s, often spoke about controversial subjects from his pulpit. He once said that if he gave a sermon and at least one person did not walk out in protest, the sermon was not worth giving.

My criticism of Greg Gutfeld’s conspiracy theory was worth writing, despite his unpleasant call, because he plays a role in shaping public opinion regarding Ukraine. A few days after his original remarks, Gutfeld referred to his exchange with Benjamin Hall as “a little kerfuffle.” But it was much more than that. It matters whether the American public views reports of Ukrainian suffering as a conspiracy to manufacture “an emotional response,” or as shining a light on the genuine atrocities that Russian forces are committing. In the end, public opinion will help determine how the United States responds to the horrors that are being inflicted upon Ukraine.


Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust.

Greg Gutfeld Is Mad at Me (About Ukraine and the Holocaust) Read More »

Study: Antisemitism Far More Likely At Schools With Faculty Members That Support BDS

The AMCHA Initiative released a study on March 16 concluding that antisemitism was more likely to occur at schools that had several faculty members endorsing boycotts against Israel.

The study, titled “Faculty Academic Boycotters: Ground Zero for Campus Antisemitism,” found that United States college campuses that had at least five faculty members who support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement “were 3.6 times more likely to have acts targeting Jewish and pro-Israel students for harm” and “4.5 times more likely to have incidents involving student BDS promotion.” The study also found that the majority of antisemitic rhetoric and incidents on campuses took place during “the seven weeks following the onset of the Israel-Hamas clashes [in May 2021], despite the fact that many schools were then in the midst of graduation activities or had even completed them.” Examples of such incidents cited in the study included Jewish students at Stanford University being told “Don’t talk to me if you’re Jewish” and someone writing in a Zoom chat during a UC Santa Cruz student government meeting: “u filthy k— HEIL HITLER BURN ALL JEWS.” The meeting was discussing an anti-Israel resolution, according to the study.

Additionally, the study found “an extremely strong correlation” between faculty members who were pro-BDS prior to the 2021 conflict and faculty members who endorsed BDS during May-June that year. The study suggests that this proves “that faculty academic boycotters are successfully influencing their colleagues to embrace an academic boycott of Israel.”

“While much attention is paid to anti-Zionist student groups like Students for Justice in Palestine, faculty are flying under the radar, yet they are a significant and dangerous contributor to campus antisemitism,” AMCHA Initiative Director Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, who was one of the researchers in the study, said in a statement. “Our new research overwhelmingly suggests that they are the ones instigating, inspiring, encouraging and modeling the playbook for students to follow.” 

She also noted that the Middle East Studies Association of North America (MESA) is on the verge of endorsing BDS. MESA’s members have been voting on the matter for the past couple of months, and voting ends on March 22. “With the MESA vote looming and 3,000 primary purveyors of Israel-related courses and departmentally-sponsored events about to endorse an academic boycott of Israel – providing disciplinary legitimacy for such faculty abuse – the problem is likely to grow exponentially worse for Jewish students,” Rossman-Benjamin said.

Asaf Romirowsky, who heads Scholars for Peace in the Middle East (SPME) and the Association for the Study of the Middle East and North Africa (ASMEA), with the latter being an alternative to MESA, told the Journal in a phone interview that the AMCHA study was “solid” and confirmed “what we’ve been observing for years.” “The last war in Gaza that we saw in May … when you saw the plethora of hundreds of statements to come out of departments and centers, all with the same copy-and-pastes, fallacious accusations of crimes against humanity, genocide, apartheid and what not, it was literally appalling,” he said.

As for MESA, Romirowsky said that because MESA overwhelmingly voted in December 2021 in favor of advancing a resolution endorsing BDS for a vote to its membership at large, he thinks it’s a fait-accompli that the organization will vote in favor of the resolution come March 22. “They have laid down the groundwork for this to happen years ago,” he said, pointing to the fact that MESA revised their bylaws in 2017 to state that they are no longer nonpolitical. “They’re clearly a politicized advocacy organization, and BDS ties directly into what they’re doing. The people at the top are pro-BDSers … these are the people who claim to be so-called experts on the Middle East, so there’s a whole trickle-down effect to the whole architecture.

“To my mind, BDS is a halo for the totality to the Arab-Israeli conflict,” Romirowsky added. “So that’s exactly the kind of narrative they’re putting out there.”

MESA did not immediately respond to the Journal’s request for comment.

Study: Antisemitism Far More Likely At Schools With Faculty Members That Support BDS Read More »

Bennett, Lapid: “We Refuse to Believe” US Will Remove IRGC Terror Designation in New Iran Deal

Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and Foreign Minister Yair Lapid issued a joint statement on March 18 saying that they “refuse to believe that the Biden administration will remove the terror designation” from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in a new Iran deal.

The joint statement called the IRGC “a terrorist organization that has murdered thousands of people, including Americans.” “The Iranian Revolutionary Guards are Hezbollah in Lebanon, they are Islamic Jihad in Gaza, they are the Houthis in Yemen, they are the militias in Iraq. The IRGC are responsible for attacks on American civilians and American forces throughout the Middle East, including in the past year. The IRGC were behind plans to assassinate senior American government officials. They were involved in the murder of hundreds of thousands of Syrian civilians, they destroyed Lebanon & they’re brutally oppressing Iranian civilians. They kill Jews because they’re Jews, Christians because they’re Christians, & Muslims because they refuse to surrender to them.” Bennett and Lapid added that removing the terrorist designation from the IRGC would be “an insult to the victims and would ignore documented reality supported by unequivocal evidence.” 

“We find it hard to believe that the IRGC’s designation as a terrorist organization will be removed in exchange for a promise not to harm Americans,” they said. “The fight against terrorism is a global one, a shared mission of the entire world. We believe that the U.S. will not abandon its closest allies in exchange for empty promises from terrorists.”

The potential lifting of the terror designation of the IRGC has been a point of concern among some House Democrats as well, as 12 of them wrote a letter to the Biden administration on March 10 stating that they are “highly concerned” over the coming deal, citing reports that it would remove the terrorist designation from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as well as sanctions on members of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s office. “It is hard to envision supporting an agreement along the lines being publicly discussed,” they said.

State Department spokesperson Ned Price said on March 17 that a new deal is “close” but they’re “not there yet,” though he sounded optimistic that “the remaining issues can be bridged,” The Times of Israel (TOI) reported. The TOI report also noted that Iran is transforming their uranium “into a type that is less easily recovered and diluted so that it can then be removed from the country” despite warnings from Britain, France and Germany against doing so.

Justice Minister Gideon Sa’ar also lobbied against the pending new Iran deal during a memorial  ceremony for the victims of the 1992 terrorist attack in Buenos Aires, when a car bomb exploded at the Israeli embassy in the city. “The perpetrator of the attack in Argentina is Iran, and it is our moral duty to continue to pursue them until they are brought to justice,” Sa’ar said, per The Times of Israel. He argued that re-entering the deal would be “dangerous.” “The lifting of sanctions under the agreement will transfer huge sums to Iran and its proxies, like Hezbollah, harming peace and stability in the Middle East, and strengthening terror elements,” he said.

Bennett, Lapid: “We Refuse to Believe” US Will Remove IRGC Terror Designation in New Iran Deal Read More »