fbpx

September 21, 2021

House Democrats Remove Iron Dome Money in Government Funding Bill

House Democrats have stripped a provision of the government funding bill that would have provided $1 billion toward Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system.

The provision was reportedly removed due to criticism from progressives in the House, including Representatives Alexandrio Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI). The Continuing Resolution (CR) would fund the government until December 3; if it isn’t passed by the end of the month, a government shutdown would occur. The Iron Dome funding will instead be inserted into a separate defense bill.

Some House Democrats criticized the move.

“Iron Dome is a defensive system used by one of our closest allies to save civilian lives,” Representative Ted Deutch (D-FL) tweeted. “It needs to be replenished because thousands of rockets were fired by the Hamas terrorists who control Gaza. Consider this my pushing back against this decision.”

 

Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY) similarly tweeted, “A missile defense system (i.e. Iron Dome) defends civilians from missiles. Hence the name. Only in a morally inverted universe would this be considered a ‘controversy.’”

Representative Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) also tweeted: “The Iron Dome protects innocent civilians in Israel from terrorist attacks and some of my colleagues have now blocked funding it. We must stand by our historic ally — the only democracy in the Middle East.”

Republican lawmakers argued that the move showed that Republicans are the sole pro-Israel party.

“Democrats just pulled funding from the Iron Dome—the missile defense system that has saved countless lives in Israel from Hamas’ rocket attacks,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) tweeted. “While Dems capitulate to the antisemitic influence of their radical members, Republicans will always stand with Israel.”

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) tweeted that the Democrats have capitulated “to the anti-Semitic Left. They hate Israel so much that Dems are stripping $1 BILLION in funding for Iron Dome—a purely defensive system that protects countless innocent civilians from Hamas rockets. Will any Dems have the courage to denounce?”

House Republican Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) also tweeted, “Some House Democrats hate Israel so much that they’re refusing to pass their own spending bill if it includes funding for the Iron Dome—which protects our ally from terrorists. This is how radical they’ve become.”

Jewish groups also criticized the House Democrats’ decision.

“While we understand the additional Iron Dome funding will be included in the forthcoming defense appropriations bill, these critical funds will now unnecessarily be further delayed,” Sandra Parker, Christians United for Israel (CUFI) Action Fund chairwoman, said in a statement. “Those who refused to support the CR because it included funds for a purely defensive system have shown once again that they are neither pro-Palestinian nor pro-peace, they are simply anti-Israel. There is no spin, no Washingtonian explanation, no excuse whatsoever that merits opposition to Israel’s missile defense system. The simplest explanation is the accurate one: there are fringe members of Congress who despise Israel’s existence, and today, their party’s Congressional leadership buckled to their blatant, vile hatred.”

AIPAC similarly tweeted, “Extremists in Congress are playing politics with Israeli & Palestinian lives. Calling to remove funding for a lifesaving defensive system is an affront to our values, risks further conflict, and is counter to the commitment made by Biden & supported by Congressional leadership.”

Stop Antisemitism accused progressive House Democrats of putting “forth a spending bill removing Israel’s ability to defend herself from terror, ultimately resulting in more dead Jews. Remember this the next time they tweet thoughts of remembrance on Yom Hashoah [Holocaust Remembrance Day].”

Republican Jewish Coalition National Chairman Norm Coleman also said in a statement, “By cowardly caving to the Israel-hating wing of their party and blocking vital assistance to support our ally Israel, House Democrats have emboldened the likes of Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to continue dragging their party even further to the radical Left. It is stunning that within one week of celebrating the one-year anniversary of the historic and trailblazing Abraham Accords peace agreements between Israel, Bahrain and the [United Arab Emirates] House Democrats have chosen to block essential funding for Israel’s security.”

He added: “Today’s disgraceful decision by House Democrats starkly shows why it is critical that Republicans flip the House of Representatives in 2022. The choice is clear as we head into the 2022 midterms and beyond. There is only one pro-Israel party: the Republican Party.”

The Jewish Democratic Council of America, on the other hand, tweeted that the fact that the Iron Dome funding will be included in an upcoming defense bill shows that the United States “remains committed to Israel’s security and right to self-defense, and the overwhelming majority of Democrats are committed to ensuring Israel receives this funding.”

Democratic Majority for Israel also tweeted, “Iron Dome is used to protect all Israelis—Jewish and Arab alike—from missile attacks. Thank you to the majority of Democrats who spoke out against attempts to undermine it today.”

IfNotNow, on the other hand, tweeted that the House Democrats’ decision “shows how far the politics on Israel/Palestine have changed in recent years. It is long past time for the US to stop giving unconditional military aid to Israel while it maintains apartheid and occupation.”

House Democrats Remove Iron Dome Money in Government Funding Bill Read More »

Half of AEPi, AEPhi Students Hide Their Jewish Identity on College Campuses, Poll Says

A new poll released by Louis Brandeis Center on September 20 found that half of students in the Alpha Epsilon Pi (AEPi) fraternity and Alpha Epsilon Phi (AEPhi) sorority hide their Jewish identities on college campuses.

The poll, which was conducted by the Cohen Research Group from April 14-21, surveyed 710 AEPi members and 317 AEPhi members. Forty-nine percent of AEPi members and 50% of AEPhi members said they felt like they had to hide their Jewish identities while attending virtual or in-person events on campus. Of those who said they felt like they needed to hide their Jewish identities, most cited concerns about being “verbally attacked.” About 30% said they were concerned about a professor marginalizing or penalizing them and about a fifth said they were “concerned about being physically attacked.”

Thirteen percent of AEPi freshmen said they sometimes felt like they needed to hide their identity, whereas 22% of AEPi seniors felt that way. Among AEPhi members, those numbers were 10% and 24%, respectively. Those who felt that they needed to hide their identities “often” were at 2% for AEPi freshmen and 3% for AEPi seniors; similarly, those numbers were at 2% for both AEPhi freshmen and seniors.

Overall, 64% of AEPi members and 67% of AEPhi members said they felt unsafe being Jewish on college campuses. Twenty-six percent of AEPi members and 17% of AEPhi members said they had experienced or heard about an antisemitic incident on their campus over the past four months. 

Kenneth L. Marcus, Founder and Chairman of the Brandeis Center, told the Journal that “there is a lot of disturbing information” in the poll, saying that it was particularly “startling” that 11% of AEPi members and 7% of AEPhi members were aware of incidents in which students were spat at for being Jewish. The poll noted that these didn’t include the 15 AEPi members and the lone AEPhi member claiming that they were spat at for being Jewish. Marcus also argued that the poll likely understates the amount of antisemitism on campus since it was taken before Israel-Hamas conflict in May. 

“We know that antisemitic incidents were far higher at the end of this semester than they were during the period when this survey was done,” Marcus said. 

But Marcus felt that the most disturbing part of the survey was the number of AEPi and AEPhi members who didn’t feel comfortable expressing their Jewish identity on campus. “This grinding antisemitism over time has been having an effect on students, and the longer they’re on campus, the more intense the effect is. The more they are on campus, the more they see the extent of the problem and start to disengage Jewishly.”

He warned that such disengagement could be a long-term detriment for the Jewish community as a whole. “It’s not just a matter of students who wear kippahs deciding not to wear a kippah, although it is certainly deeply unfortunate if they feel they aren’t safe to do that. It’s also about students who feel that they can’t attend Jewish religious services or Israel-related events. The long-term effect, of course, is that it will increase ignorance and reduce communal involvement. We need for young people when they’re still in college to be exposed to a variety of ideas and practices and there’s no better time for them to deepen their involvement in Jewish life. If the opposite is happening, it will certainly effect the way they live their lives after their graduate.”

Half of AEPi, AEPhi Students Hide Their Jewish Identity on College Campuses, Poll Says Read More »

San Diego Local AFT Demonizes and Delegitimizes Only Israel But Claims It’s Not Antisemitic

Suspend disbelief for a moment and imagine a teachers’ union in California voting on and publishing a statement or resolution that exclusively laid blame for the ongoing conflict in Nigeria, which has killed millions of people since 1960, on only the Muslims in Nigeria. 

Imagine further, that in laying blame on and condemning only the Muslims living in Nigeria for this deadly conflict, that this resolution repeatedly lied about the actions of the Muslims in Nigeria, and completely ignored any actions or conduct by any other parties to the conflict, in order to paint the picture that Nigerian Muslims were exclusively responsible for the deaths and misery caused by the ethnic conflict in Nigeria. Imagine that this statement was issued on the eve of Ramadan.

Then, imagine that this very one-sided statement included the following disclaimer:

“WHEREAS, we condemn the recent spate of anti-Muslim attacks in the United States and other parts of the world, just as we condemn white supremacy and violence against Blacks, and members of the AAPI, LatinX, and LGBTQ communities. We also unequivocally condemn Islamophobia or anti-Muslim violence wherever it occurs. However, let us be clear that condemning Nigerian Muslims for their war crimes against non-Muslims is not anti-Muslim or Islamophobic.”

Now, imagine the reaction to this resolution. Imagine the uproar. Imagine the righteous indignation to the inequity of such a one-sided resolution. And imagine the likely greater indignation over the insensitivity of issuing such a statement right before Ramadan and the audacity of trying to preempt claims of Islamophobia and anti-Muslim bigotry by issuing such a flimsy disclaimer about how your mendacious, one-sided resolution somehow wasn’t grounded in, and promoting, anti-Muslim hatred.

Of course, given the ideological bent and the culture of politically correct intersectionality that governs the actions and thoughts of most teachers’ unions in California, such a scenario is actually unimaginable. But, substitute “Jews” for “Muslims,” and “Israel” for “Nigeria,” and the foregoing is exactly what the American Federation of Teachers AFT Guild, Local 1931 (“AFT”) did in its “Statement by the AFT Guild, Local 1931 regarding the Occupied Palestinian Territories,” which the AFT in San Diego issued on the eve of Rosh Hashana on September 5, 2021.

The mere fact that this one-sided statement was issued right at the start of the most important and sanctified holidays and ten-day period of time in the Jewish calendar is enough to make it deeply offensive. Add to it that nearly every sentence and claim in this statement is based on lies that serve to demonize and delegitimize the only Jewish state in the world while also holding Israel to a different standard than every other state in the world, including all of Israel’s neighbors, and this AFT statement hits the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s trifecta for antisemitism.

While it should be read in full to appreciate its mendacity, audacity and raw promotion of antisemitism (all while issuing patronizing disclaimers about the very Jew-hatred it promotes) some of the bigger Pinocchios in the AFT statement can be found right in its opening clause:

“WHEREAS, the AFT Guild condemns the forced removal of Palestinian residents in West Jerusalem, the bombing of civilian areas in the besieged Gaza Strip, and the continued human rights violations committed by the Israeli government during its 73-year occupation of this land.”

“West Jerusalem” is a reference to the section of Jerusalem that Israel was able to hold onto after Jordan invaded and tried to destroy it in 1948. Jordan did conquer the Old City of Jerusalem, including the Jewish Quarter; and Jordan then illegally held onto all of the land it conquered in 1948 until it lost it during Egypt’s, Syria’s and Jordan’s second attempt to destroy Israel in 1967. But while Jordan forcibly evicted every single Jew from the Old City of Jerusalem and destroyed nearly 60 synagogues in the process (as well as damage numerous other Jewish holy sites and cemeteries) no Arabs were forcibly removed from “West Jerusalem.”

As for the “bombing of civilian areas in the besieged Gaza Strip” this whopper of misstatements, in only nine words, ignores why Israel is bombing anywhere in Gaza, who else is bombing Gaza, and why Gaza is “besieged.”  

Israel “bombs” Gaza for same reason that Gaza is “besieged” (meaning subject to a limited blockade): because Hamas, a tyrannical, theocracy, terrorist group that is the ideological brother-in-extremist-hate to the Taliban, and has a Charter that reads like it was written by a hybrid of Osama Bin Laden and Nazi propagandist-in-chief Joseph Goebbels, controls Gaza and has fired approximately 20,000 rockets and missiles at Israeli civilians, all while it tries to launch terrorist attacks from the sea and through tunnels at other Israeli civilians.

The AFT statement doesn’t mention Hamas. It also doesn’t mention the 20,000 missiles and rockets fired at Israeli civilians.

The AFT statement doesn’t mention Hamas. It also doesn’t mention the 20,000 missiles and rockets fired at Israeli civilians. It doesn’t even mention the Hamas rockets and missiles that misfire and land on (and kill) people in Gaza. The AFT statement also doesn’t mention that Gaza has a border with Egypt and that Egypt also blockades Gaza (because Hamas is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, which threatens the stability of the Egyptian government). 

None of these important facts make it into the AFT’s one-sided statement. More importantly, this statement leaves the false impression that Israel is just bombing “civilian areas” as capriciously and broadly as the Allies bombed Berlin or Dresden during WWII. The truth, however, is that Israel has always been incredibly careful in its responses to Hamas rocket fire. It has targeted only Hamas’s weapons and weapon systems (like rocket launchers) as well as Hamas’s fighters and leadership; and Israel’s military has called off countless missions against those targets when it appeared that there were going to be civilian casualties. That is why Israel’s combatant to civilian casualty ratio in all of its conflicts with Hamas in Gaza has been at least twice as good as the NATO allies in the Balkans or for the U.S. or British forces in Iraq. But one would never know that based on the misleading claims in the AFT statement.

There are many more outright lies, critical omissions and corresponding demonizations of the one Jewish state in the AFT’s Rosh Hashana statement. One such lie is where they claim:

“[S]ince the 1967 War, 48,488 Palestinian homes and other structures have been demolished compared to none belonging to Israelis.”

First, this statement changes the date back to 1967—probably to avoid all of the Jewish homes, synagogues and holy sites destroyed by the Jordanian army between 1948 and 1967. Second, even with 1967 at its starting point, it’s a lie. The near 50,000 “homes and other structures” is a completely made up number pulled from the very corrupt and authoritarian Palestinian Authority. To believe it, one would have to believe Israel destroys approximately 1000 Palestinian Arab homes a year. And while Israel does destroy homes that are built without proper permitting, as well as the homes of terrorists convicted of murdering Israelis, that number has not come close to averaging 1000 per year, even based on the hyper-inflated numbers provided by the very biased and anti-Israel UN. 

Meanwhile, the claim that no “Israeli” (meaning Jewish) homes have been demolished since 1967 is an even more obvious outright lie. As noted above, Israel demolishes, like all countries, homes that are built without proper permitting. Every year, that includes homes built by Jews throughout Israel and in particular in Judea and Samaria. And anyone who watches the news or can read a newspaper article (which, one should be able to assume, includes educators who belong to the AFT), should know that nearly 3000 Jewish homes in Gaza were destroyed after Israel unilaterally, for the cause of peace, withdrew every single Jew from Gaza in 2005. 

But the biggest lie that permeates the AFT’s statement and makes it is so plainly antisemitic is the lie of omission.      

While the AFT’s statement pays quick tribute to the civilians on “both sides” that have “suffered casualties,” it then only blames Israel for those casualties. Reading the AFT’s statement, one would never know that:

  1. Before Israel even declared its independence in 1948, it twice (in 1937 and 1947) agreed to share well over half of the arable land west of the Jordan River, and twice agreed to the creation of the first ever independent Arab state west of the Jordan River. 
  2. The Arab side to the conflict rejected both of those offers and every peace deal offered to them since then, in favor of war; and, but for those wars, there would have been no refugees or casualties from the Arab-Israeli conflict.
  3. After Israel declared its independence, Arab dictatorships throughout the MENA forced nearly 1,000,000 Jews from their homes and almost all of those Jewish refugees found refuge in Israel.
  4. From 1948 to June 1967—before there was any “occupied territory”—no one ever tried to create a Palestinian Arab state in either Gaza or in Judea and Samaria (the so-called “West Bank”) even though both areas were controlled by Arab countries; and during this time, nearly 1000 Israeli civilians were killed in terrorist attacks.
  5. The Palestinian Authority in 2000 and 2001, without ever making a counteroffer, rejected two different offers that would have created a first-ever Palestinian Arab state in over 90% of the “West Bank” and Gaza; and they launched a brutal bombing campaign (called the Second Intifada) that murdered over 1000 Israelis and maimed another 10,000 in barely more than four years.
  6. The Palestinian Authority’s corrupt dictator (who recently built himself a $13,000,000 home and is in the 17th year of his original four-year term) funds a virtual “pay to slay” program that incentivizes Palestinian Arabs to murder Jews by paying those who murder Jews nearly eight times the average salary earned by a high school teacher working for the PA.
  7. Both the Palestinian Authority and Hamas promote incredibly antisemitic propaganda that demonizes all Jews (not just Israelis) and deny the historic, cultural, archeological and religious connection of the Jewish people to the land of Israel—all while promoting Nazi-like stereotypes of Jews. The Hamas Charter, for example, literally blames Jews for causing every conflict from the French Revolution through WWII. Just like the Nazis did.

None of these, and numerous other easily discoverable facts are even alluded to in the AFT’s statement. 

Thus, the uninformed reader could easily conclude that the one Jewish state in the world is the only one that is to blame for all of this violence and the lack of peace in the region. 

And after the uninformed reader scours through the AFT website and doesn’t see a single statement condemning Syria (which has killed over 500,000 of its citizens), China (which runs a brutal police state and has over 1,000,000 Uighur Muslims in concentration camps) or Qatar (which uses slave labor and has thousands of political prisoners) or any of the brutal regimes that make it a crime to be gay (including both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority), why wouldn’t that reader conclude that the world’s only Jewish state must be truly evil? Among all of these blatant war criminals and abusers of human rights, the only state the AFT feels it has to call out in writing, is Israel.

It is somewhat ironic that these same academics and union leaders—who regularly claim that Israel is supposedly “disproportionate” when it responds to thousands of rockets being fired at its citizens—never see how “disproportionate” their reactions are to Israel in a world where millions are killed in Africa, millions are imprisoned in China, and gay people are hung from scaffolding in Iran. 

History, and in particular, Jewish history, has shown that once a group of people is successfully demonized, one can rationalize doing almost anything to them, including mass murder. That is what makes this AFT statement, and the corresponding milquetoast reaction to it by most educators, politicians and other leaders, so antisemitic and so dangerous.  

History, and in particular, Jewish history, has shown that once a group of people is successfully demonized, one can rationalize doing almost anything to them, including mass murder.

But perhaps the most antisemitic aspect of the AFT’s statement is its opening clause and justification for their issuance of this one-sided statement, where the AFT refers to Israel’s “73 year occupation of this land.” 

Seventy three years ago, Israel first declared its independence. It is when Israel survived a self-described “war of annihilation” declared by the entire Arab League, and fought against five Arab states and at least two different Palestinian Arab militias. It wasn’t when Israel gained control of the disputed territories of Gaza and Judea and Samaria, during the Six Day War, from Egypt and Jordan. 

According to AFT, Jews living in any part of the Jewish people’s indigenous, historic and religious homeland are “occupiers.” According to AFT, the country that is home to nearly 50% of the world’s Jews isn’t legitimate and should be destroyed. The AFT doesn’t say what should happen to the nearly seven million Jews living in Israel, but given how one-sided their statement is, and the militant fist logo that AFT placed at the end of their statement, the implication is clear. At best, they don’t care. At worst, what’s a few million more dead Jews? 


Micha Danzig served in the Israeli Army and is a former police officer with the NYPD. He is currently an attorney and is very active with numerous Jewish and pro-Israel organizations, including Stand With Us and the FIDF, and is a national board member of Herut North America.

San Diego Local AFT Demonizes and Delegitimizes Only Israel But Claims It’s Not Antisemitic Read More »