fbpx

November 8, 2016

Eat more chips, France’s Sarkozy tells those who shun pork

France's would-be president, Nicolas Sarkozy, says children who do not eat pork – the case for many of the country's large Jewish and Muslim minorities – should order a double portion of chips when their school canteen puts ham on the menu.

Sarkozy, trailing rival Alain Juppe in opinion polls as they campaign for conservative party backing in the presidential election six months from now, has sought to present himself as the voice of a silent majority in a formally secular country where the majority are of nonetheless of Catholic origin.

Two weeks from a primary election organized by his party, Les Republicains (The Republicans), the man who was president from 2007 to 2012 held a political meeting overnight in his conservative fiefdom of Neuilly, west of Paris.

“If a little guy's family does not eat pork and the menu at the (school) canteen is a slice of ham and chips, well, he skips the ham and eats a double helping of chips. In a republic, it's the same rule and the same menu for everyone,” he said.

France, with a total population of more than 65 million, is home to Europe's largest Jewish and Muslim communities.

After attacks claimed by Islamist militants that killed more than 230 people in the past 18 months, security and religious-based tensions are firmly in focus before the election, which will be held in two rounds next April and May.

Opinion polls suggest Sarkozy's main center-right rival, Juppe, a former prime minister, is favored both to win the conservative party candidacy and is best-placed to defeat Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right National Front party, in a possible runoff .

The 'let them eat chips' suggestion is reminiscent of one often – and probably wrongly – attributed to Marie-Antoinette, beheaded wife of King Louis XVI, who in urban legend is reported to have said of bread shortages for the poor: “Let them eat cake.”

Eat more chips, France’s Sarkozy tells those who shun pork Read More »

Trump’s surprise wins in key states rattle world markets

Republican Donald Trump scored a series of shocking wins in battleground U.S. states including Florida and Ohio on Tuesday, opening a path to the White House for the political outsider and rattling world markets that had counted on a win by Democrat Hillary Clinton.

With investors worried a Trump victory could cause economic and global uncertainty, the U.S. dollar sank and stock markets plummeted in wild Asian trading. Opinion polls before Election Day had given Clinton a slim lead.

Mexico's peso plunged to its lowest-ever levels as Trump's chances of winning the presidency increased. Concerns of a Trump victory have weighed heavily on the peso for months because of his threats to rip up a free trade agreement with Mexico and tax money sent home by migrants to pay to build a wall on the southern U.S. border.

Trump surged to wins in Florida, Ohio, Iowa and North Carolina, and Fox News projected a win for him in Wisconsin. With voting completed in 49 of the 50 U.S. states, he also narrowly led in Michigan and New Hampshire, edging him closer to 270 Electoral College votes needed to win the state-by-state fight for the White House.

Shortly after Fox called Wisconsin for Trump, supporters at his election evening rally in New York began to chant “lock her up” – a common refrain on the campaign trail for the former U.S. secretary of state repeatedly dubbed “Crooked Hillary” by Trump.

A packed crowd in the lobby of Trump's new hotel in Washington D.C. chanted “lock her up, lock her up,” and “USA, USA, USA” as state after state was called for Trump.

Clinton still had ways to reach 270 electoral votes, but she would have to sweep the remaining battleground states including Pennsylvania, Michigan and Nevada, and pull off an upset win in Arizona.

Trump captured conservative states in the South and Midwest, while Clinton swept several states on the East Coast and Illinois in the Midwest.

After running close throughout the night in Virginia, Clinton pulled out the swing state that is home to her running mate, Senator Tim Kaine.

At 8:55 p.m. EST (0155 GMT on Wednesday), Clinton acknowledged a battle that was unexpectedly tight given her edge in opinion polls going into Election Day.

She tweeted: “This team has so much to be proud of. Whatever happens tonight, thank you for everything.”

As of 11:40 p.m. EST (0440 GMT on Wednesday), Trump had 244 electoral votes to Clinton's 209, with U.S. television networks projecting the winner in 41 of the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

A wealthy real-estate developer and former reality TV host, Trump rode a wave of anger toward Washington insiders to challenge Clinton, whose gold-plated establishment resume includes stints as a first lady, U.S. senator and secretary of state.

UNPOPULAR CANDIDATES

Both candidates had historically low popularity ratings, although Trump's were worse than Clinton's, in an election that many voters characterized as a choice between two unpleasant alternatives.

Before Tuesday's voting, Clinton led Trump, 44 percent to 39 percent in the last Reuters/Ipsos national tracking poll. A Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation poll gave her a 90 percent chance of defeating Trump and becoming the first woman elected U.S. president.

Also at stake on Tuesday was control of the U.S. Congress. Republicans will maintain their six-year control over the House of Representatives, major TV networks projected, and were on track to defend their Senate majority, as well, against a handful of failed Democratic challengers.

In a presidential campaign that focused more on the character of the candidates than on policy, Clinton, 69, and Trump, 70, accused each other of being fundamentally unfit to lead the country.

Trump entered the race 17 months ago and survived a series of seemingly crippling blows, many of them self-inflicted, including the emergence in October of a 2005 video in which he boasted about making unwanted sexual advances on women. He apologized but within days, several women emerged to say he had groped them, allegations he denied.

He was judged the loser of all three presidential debates with Clinton and she led him by varying margins for months in opinion polls.

Trump won avid support among a core base of white non-college educated workers with his promise to be the “greatest jobs president that God ever created.” He has vowed to impose a 35 percent tariff on goods exported to the United States by U.S. companies that went abroad.

His volatile nature and unorthodox proposals led to campaign feuds with a long list of people, including Muslims, the disabled, Republican U.S. Senator John McCain, Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly, the family of a slain Muslim-American soldier, a Miss Universe winner and a federal judge of Mexican heritage.

Trump’s surprise wins in key states rattle world markets Read More »

Trump has slight edge on Clinton in several battleground states

Republican Donald Trump held slight leads in the vital battleground states of Florida, Virginia, North Carolina and Ohio on Tuesday, clinging to a narrow advantage over Democrat Hillary Clinton in key states that could decide their race for the White House.

With voting completed in more than two-thirds of the 50 U.S. states, the race was too close to call in Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire and Virginia, leaving the race for the White House on a knife's edge.

Both candidates scored victories in states where they were expected to win. Trump captured conservative states in the South and Midwest, while Clinton swept several states on the East Coast and Illinois in the Midwest.

But Trump's slight edge in Florida, Virginia, North Carolina and Ohio gave him an early advantage in the state-by-state fight for 270 Electoral College votes needed to win.

Clinton had more options to reach 270, with Trump needing a virtual sweep of about six toss-up states to win. But a Trump win in those four states would make it nearly impossible for Clinton to clinch the White House.

With 94 percent of the vote counted in Florida, Trump led Clinton by about 140,000 votes out of 9 million cast. In Virginia, with 76 percent counted, Trump led by 60,000 votes out of 2.9 million cast. With 55 percent of the vote counted in Ohio, Trump led by about 275,000 votes out of 3 million cast.

As of 9:30 p.m. EST (0230 GMT on Wednesday), Trump had 133 electoral votes to Clinton's 104, with U.S. television networks projecting the winner in 25 of the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Clinton is seen by financial markets as more likely to ensure financial and political stability and as the early election results showed a close battle, the U.S. dollar skidded in wild Asian trade on Wednesday.

Much of the action was in currencies where the Mexican peso has become a touchstone for sentiment on the election, as Trump's trade policies are seen as damaging to Mexico's export-heavy economy.

Going into Election Day, Clinton led Trump, 44 percent to 39 percent in the last Reuters/Ipsos national tracking poll. A Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation poll gave her a 90 percent chance of defeating Trump and becoming the first woman elected U.S. president.

Also at stake on Tuesday was control of Congress. Television networks projected Republicans would retain control of the House of Representatives, where all 435 seats were up for grabs.

In the Senate, where Republicans were defending a slim four-seat majority, Democrats scored their first breakthrough in Illinois when Republican Senator Mark Kirk lost re-election. But Republicans Rob Portman in Ohio and Marco Rubio in Florida won high-profile Senate re-election fights.

In a presidential campaign that focused more on the character of the candidates than on policy, Clinton, 69, a former U.S. secretary of state, and Trump, 70, a New York businessman, accused each other of being fundamentally unfit to lead the country.

Trump again raised the possibility on Tuesday of not accepting the election's outcome, saying he had seen reports of voting irregularities. He gave few details and Reuters could not immediately verify the existence of such problems.

Trump has slight edge on Clinton in several battleground states Read More »

Speechless in America

Here we are at the climax of a crazy, nasty and historic election year — when we finally announce our new president — and here I am at my laptop, with very little to say. Seriously, what can I say that you haven’t already heard or that you won’t hear somewhere else? That Trump is an idiot and a bigot? That Hillary is corrupt and dishonest?

In a way, it’s perfectly appropriate that this column is going to press before I find out the official winner. It reinforces why I have so little to say. So, stuck in this limbo of speechlessness, I thought I would share some of the ideas I considered for a post-election column, and you can decide on their relevance.

My first thought was something on “The year of political decadence.” The darkest clichés of politics — terrible candidates, ad hominem attacks, absence of substance, a ratings-mad media, widespread cynicism, etc. — seemed to crescendo this year into a perfect storm of disgust. With the additional headwind of Wikileaks, which revealed the “secret” correspondence of the Washington elite, we saw a political establishment get naked in front of us and confirm the cronyism and ugliness we always suspected.

I’m not trying to draw any equivalencies here between the candidates. I don’t have to. I’m just saying that, for me, the net effect of this dirty election season was a need to take a shower and go into political detox. 

This sad state of affairs made me consider another column, “Should I be happy?” Faced with the evil of two lessers, should I join the pro-Hillary and anti-Trump camps and rejoice in her expected victory? For those traumatized by the possibility of a President Trump, I understand the intense desire to dodge the Trumpian bullet. But that’s a far cry from claiming that a President Clinton — the ultimate insider mistrusted by a majority of the country and whose future may well be crippled by endless investigations — would be cause for popping the champagne. It wouldn’t.

Any political ecosystem that gives us a choice between a chauvinist pig and an unscrupulous insider is one we should bemoan, not honor. I saw this anonymous quote recently that gave me the chills: “Here's the problem with voting for the lesser of two evils: How can you be sure you're not actually voting for the better of two liars?”

Which led me to a third idea for a post-election column, “Make our communities great again.” If we are so turned off by a political establishment that keeps disappointing us, should we not look for areas where we do have the power to make a difference? It’s a quote from one of my favorite conservative writers, Yuval Levin, that got me thinking in that direction:

“The premise of conservatism has always been that what matters most about society happens in the space between the individual and the state — the space occupied by families, communities, civic and religious institutions, and the private economy — and that creating, sustaining and protecting that space and helping all Americans take part in what happens there are among the foremost purposes of government.”

What intrigued me is this notion that “what matters most about society happens in the space between the individual and the state.” Right now, after 18 months of yuckiness emanating from the state, I could use a little time-out from the people who will run that state. So, instead of talking to my kids about what our next president will or will not do, I think I will talk to them about what they can do in their own communities to make our country better.

I will remind them of one of my favorite statements ever from a politician, one I don’t recall hearing recently: “Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.” Those words from President John F. Kennedy in 1961 were not the words of a pandering politician desperate for our vote. They were the words of a courageous leader honest enough to tell us the truth.

The bipartisan truth in recent years is that our political leaders have let us down. It’s bad enough that they have accentuated our divisions and made many of us lose faith in government. Do they really deserve so much of our attention? Let’s stop allowing ruthless politicians who are beholden to big money and special interests to contaminate our conversations and even our relationships. 

Instead, we can turn more of our attention to the unsung heroes in our communities who instinctively put other people first. They could be volunteers at a soup kitchen or at a rape trauma center. They could be activists organizing dialogues that bring people of different faiths together. These heroes don’t live in Washington and they don’t make the evening news. In my book, though, they are the ones who make America great. 

Regardless of who wins, that’s pretty much all I have to say for this week. 

Speechless in America Read More »

Trump, Clinton split wins in early states but bigger battles ahead

Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton scored early victories on Tuesday in their bitter presidential race, with Trump winning as expected in conservative Kentucky and Indiana while Clinton captured Vermont.

The early victories for both candidates in the three states were long predicted but not especially significant in a national race where opinion polls show Clinton has an edge. Polls also closed in the battleground states of Virginia and Georgia although there were no immediate results.

Voting was due to end in the vital battleground states of North Carolina and Ohio in 30 minutes.

Clinton led Trump, 44 percent to 39 percent, in the last Reuters/Ipsos national tracking poll before Election Day. A Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation poll gave her a 90 percent chance of defeating Trump and becoming the first woman elected U.S. president.

In a campaign that focused more on the character of the candidates than on policy, Clinton, 69, a former U.S. secretary of state, and Trump, 70, a New York businessman, accused each other of being fundamentally unfit to lead the country.

Trump again raised the possibility on Tuesday of not accepting the election's outcome, saying he had seen reports of voting irregularities. He gave few details and Reuters could not immediately verify the existence of such problems.

Financial markets, betting exchanges and online trading platforms largely predicted a Clinton win, although Trump's team said he could pull off a surprise victory like the June “Brexit” vote to pull Britain out of the European Union.

Voters appeared to be worried about the country's direction and were seeking a “strong leader who can take the country back from the rich and powerful,” according to an early reading from the Reuters/Ipsos national Election Day poll.

The poll of more than 10,000 people who voted in the election showed a majority worried about their ability to get ahead in life, with little confidence in political parties or trust in the media.

Some 15 percent of Americans who cast a ballot on Tuesday said it was their first time voting in a presidential election, up from 9 percent in 2012, according to the Reuters/Ipsos Election Day poll. The poll showed 13 percent of voters waited until the final week to make up their minds.

Also at stake was control of Congress, with Republicans defending a slight four-seat majority in the 100-member Senate. The House of Representatives, where all 435 seats were up for grabs, was expected to remain in Republican hands.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average index ended up 0.4 percent as investors bet on a win for Clinton, seen by Wall Street as more likely to ensure financial and political stability. Mexico's peso hit a two-month high on Tuesday on the expectation of a loss for Trump, who has vowed to rip up a trade deal with Mexico.

In the closing stages of the race, the two campaigns focused on several crucial battleground states, including Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Florida, as they tried to piece together state-by-state victories that would give them the 270 Electoral College votes needed to capture the White House.

Clinton had more options to reach 270, with Trump needing a virtual sweep of about a half-dozen toss-up states to win.

Majorities of voters told pollsters they viewed both candidates unfavorably after a particularly bruising and divisive campaign that began in early 2015. For months, polls showed both Clinton and Trump were unpopular, although Trump was more so.

UNPOPULAR CANDIDATES

“They're both not good candidates, but I'd rather vote for 'worse' than 'worser,'” said Estefani Rico, 20, a first-time voter who cast her ballot for Clinton in Miami. “It's nerve racking that in my first time being able to vote I get the worst candidates ever,” she said.

Mary Wheeler, 94, held her nose when asked which candidate she was supporting as she stood in line to vote in St. Petersburg, Florida.

“I always vote Republican, so I guess I'll do that,” Wheeler said. “He can make a fool of himself but I think he may be able to straighten things out a little bit,” she said of Trump.

Trump, who has never previously held political office, pledged to shake up the Washington establishment but also alienated many people, including in his own party, with a campaign heavy on personal insults and unorthodox positions such as a proposal to build a wall along the Mexican border to keep out illegal immigrants.

Asked if he believed the election would not be over on Tuesday night, Trump on Tuesday told Fox News: “I'm not saying that. I have to look at what's happening. There are reports that when people vote for Republicans, the entire ticket switches over to Democrats. You've seen that. It's happening at various places.”

Fears of violence and voter intimidation across the country appeared largely unfounded.

A man armed with a rifle opened fire on Tuesday near a polling station in the Southern California town of Azusa, wounding two to three people and prompting authorities to lock down the polling place and surrounding park, police said.

Local media in Pennsylvania reported that voters in several counties had reported that touch-screen voting machines had not been recording their ballots correctly.

Republicans in Pennsylvania also complained that some of their authorized poll watchers were denied access to polling sites in Philadelphia, local media said.

Trump also sued the registrar of voters in Nevada's Clark County over a polling place in Las Vegas that remained open on Friday during an early-voting period to accommodate people, many of them Hispanic, who were lined up to cast ballots.

A Nevada judge on Tuesday rejected Trump's request for records from the polling site.

Trump and Clinton are seeking to succeed Democratic President Barack Obama, who is nearing the end of his second four-year term in the White House and is barred by the U.S. Constitution from seeking another term.

Trump, Clinton split wins in early states but bigger battles ahead Read More »

Chalk it up: Fun with blackboard paper

There’s something about chalkboards that people just love. Maybe it’s the nostalgia — if it’s possible to be nostalgic about seeing the words “pop quiz today” written in chalk. 

One big decorating trend that doesn’t seem to be going away is chalkboard walls, which I’m not a big fan of because the chalk dust gets everywhere. But the black write-on/wipe-off surface can be a lot of fun in small doses, especially when transforming otherwise plain home décor items. 

Creating chalkboard objects is really easy-peasy thanks to chalkboard adhesive contact paper. It comes in rolls, and you can buy them at many big-box stores or online retailers, such as Amazon. Just peel the contact paper from its protective backing, apply it to whatever surface you’d like, and — voila! — instant chalkboard. 

Here are a few ways to use the contact paper. Get a roll yourself, and see what you can turn into a chalkboard. (And don’t worry, there will be no pop quiz.)

Flower vase

Picture frame

Organization tools

Gift wrapping

Cards and stationery

” target=”_blank”>jonathanfongstyle.com.

Chalk it up: Fun with blackboard paper Read More »

DOCTOR STRANGE *Movie Review*

This week I review DOCTOR STRANGE.  The latest Marvel superhero movie is about the mystical rather than the physical.  When Dr. Steven Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch), a neurosurgeon, loses use of his hands following a car accident, he travels to Nepal to see The Ancient One (Tilda Swinton) as he learns that she may be able to help him.  The movie also stars Chiwetel Ejiofor, Mads Mikkelsen, Rachel McAdams, Benedict Wong and Benjamin Bratt with the requisite cameo by Marvel creator Stan Lee.

Time plays an interesting role because usually when time is used as a major theme it has to do with not having enough of it.  I think the bigger theme here had to do with how time can be a blessing and, perhaps even more so, a curse.  The differentiation is important because lack of time is a common concept; there isn’t enough time to do work or to relax or to spend with loved ones.  We don’t tend to consider that more time isn’t necessarily better.  For instance, if you live forever then you’ll have the heartache of watching everyone you love die since the whole world cannot live forever. Immortality and limitless time and life continue to be things we long for as a whole, but sometimes without acknowledging the consequences.  It’s interesting, too, how DOCTOR STRANGE uses time as a punishment, so pay attention for that element as well.

Water and how it cleanses and represents rebirth is another theme in DOCTOR STRANGE.

For more about water, religious symbolism in DOCTOR STRANGE and product placement deals, take a look below:

—>Looking for the direct link to the video?  Click here.

DOCTOR STRANGE *Movie Review* Read More »

Orthodox immigrant dedicates vote to late Muslim American soldier in viral tweet

In a tweet that has gone viral, an Orthodox Jewish immigrant dedicated his vote to Capt. Humayun Khan — a Muslim American soldier killed in Iraq.

Yosef Rapaport, who, according to his Twitter bio, consults for Agudath Israel of America, told the Washington Post that the idea came to him Tuesday morning.

“I would probably not agree politically with Capt. Khan if he met me and we talked about world affairs,” Rapaport said. “I don’t know. I can’t be sure. That doesn’t diminish one iota the deep respect I have for him and his family for what they did for America. We owe them our deepest respect.”

His tweet has been liked over 17,000 times as of Tuesday afternoon.

Rapaport, 62, is Hasidic. He immigrated to New York from Montreal 40 years ago. Both his parents and his wife’s were Holocaust survivors from Hungary.

He told the Post that the rhetoric against Muslims in this election cycle has disturbed him.

“When there’s an attack on one religious group it means my religious liberty is diminished,” he said.

Khan served as a captain in the Iraq War and was posthumously awarded a Purple Heart and a Bronze Star for saving fellow soldiers from a car bomb.

His parents made an appearance at the Democratic National Convention in July. In his speech, the slain soldier’s father, Khizr Khan, excoriated Trump and challenged him to read the Constitution. In return, Trump blasted the Khans, saying that wife and mother Ghazala Khan didn’t speak at the convention because she “wasn’t allowed to have anything to say.”

For his part, Rapaport told the Post he can’t wait for Tuesday to be over. But the reaction to his tweet has been a bright spot in an otherwise bitter campaign season.

“The people who write me in response,” he told the Forward, “it brought me to tears. It’s what makes me proud to be an American.”

Orthodox immigrant dedicates vote to late Muslim American soldier in viral tweet Read More »

Joe Biden to be honored by World Jewish Congress

Vice President Joe Biden will be honored by the World Jewish Congress with an award named for the founder of political Zionism.

On Wednesday, Biden will receive the organization’s annual Theodor Herzl Award, “which recognizes outstanding individuals who work to promote Herzl’s ideals for a safer, more tolerant world for the Jewish people,” WJC said in a statement.

The award will be presented at New York’s Pierre Hotel by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and WJC President Ronald Lauder. Kissinger will introduce Biden.

At the same event, actor Kirk Douglas will be recognized with the inaugural Teddy Kollek Award for the Advancement of Jewish Culture. Actor-director Michael Douglas will accept the award on behalf of his father.

Lauder praised Biden in a statement.

“Over the course of his more than four decades in service to this country, Vice President Biden has proven that he is a true friend of Israel and the Jewish people, a leader in the fight against  anti-Semitism, and a champion of human and civil rights for all,” Lauder said. “He has stood out over the last eight years in his devotion to ensuring that America and Israel remain close allies. When he leaves the White House in just a few months, I am confident that his commitment to both Israel and the Jewish community will remain as strong as ever.”

Kissinger is among previous recipients of the award. Others include the late Israeli President Shimon Peres; Elie and Marion Wiesel; another former secretary of state, George Shultz, and, posthumously, Ronald Reagan.

Joe Biden to be honored by World Jewish Congress Read More »

Gun control measures expected to win in four states

Gun control-related ballot measures in four states are expected to pass on Tuesday, opinion polls showed, after gun safety advocates poured a massive amount of money into backing the initiatives.

In Maine and Nevada, residents are voting on whether to mandate universal background checks for firearm sales, including private handgun transactions.

If those two measures pass, half of all Americans would live in states that have such expanded checks. Eighteen states and Washington, D.C., have already approved similar laws.

Voters in Washington state will consider allowing judges to bar dangerous people, such as accused domestic abusers, from possessing guns. In California, a referendum would ban large-capacity ammunition magazines and require certain people to pass a background check to buy ammunition.

The U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms, and gun rights advocates fiercely contest any attempt to restrict it.

The votes in Maine and Nevada represent a key test of the gun control movement's decision to turn to a state-by-state strategy after efforts to pass nationwide legislation failed in Congress.

Opponents have said the laws are not clear and would do nothing to stop criminals.

“We know today that the place where criminals are getting guns, the black market, they aren't subjecting themselves to background checks,” said Ryan Hamilton, a spokesman for the National Rifle Association-backed opposition in Nevada. “It doesn't target criminal behavior, it targets law-abiding behavior.”

Proponents have said background checks would save lives.

Jennifer Crowe, a spokeswoman for the pro-initiative campaign in Nevada, said research had shown that nearly one in 11 people in that state who purchased guns online would have failed a background check.

“We have this huge online marketplace that we know criminals are using to get guns,” she said.

Everytown for Gun Safety, the gun control group founded by billionaire former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, has spent tens of millions of dollars in Washington state, Nevada and Maine, while the National Rifle Association has focused much of its spending on supporting Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.

Shares of gun makers rose on Tuesday as investors wagered that Democrat Hillary Clinton would win the presidency. Smith & Wesson Holding Corp closed up 2.15 percent at $28.45 and Sturm Ruger & Company Inc finished up 0.86 percent at $64.40.

A Clinton presidency would likely lead to a surge in gun purchases out of fear she might try to enact stricter gun policies, said Chris Krueger, senior research analyst at Lake Street Capital Markets.

Gun control measures expected to win in four states Read More »