fbpx

September 19, 2016

Emmy applauds Jewish talent


 Emmy took a shine to Jewish talent on Sunday evening as the prime time television awards unfolded at the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles.
“Transparent,” the comedy series about a Jewish family whose father comes out as transgender won for both for its director Jill Soloway and lead actor Jeffrey Tambor.
Julia Louis-Dreyfus was the winner as actress in a comedy series for her role in “Veep.”  It was he fifth consecutive Emmy for the “Seinfeld” veteran.
Australian actor Ben Mendelsohn garnered the prize for supporting actor in a drama (“Bloodlines”). He is the descendent of an old Prussian Jewish family on his father’s side, though, to his regret, not related to composer Felix Mendelsohn or philosopher Moses Mendelsohn.
David Benioff and Daniel B. Weiss were honored for outstanding writing for the “Game of Thrones” episode “Battle of the Bastards.”
The Emmy went to Hank Azaria as guest actor in the comedy series “Ray Donovan.”
Susanne Bier took top spot as director of “The Night Manager” in the limited series, movie or dramatic special category.
Among the evening’s disappointments was a strikeout for Amy Schumer, who had been nominated for four acting and writing awards, and the slighting of Larry David’s hilarious impression of Bernie Sanders in “Saturday Night Live.”
  

Emmy applauds Jewish talent Read More »

Americans, you are not supportive enough of Israel! (Or so we ungrateful Israelis seem to think…)

Menachem Lazar of Panels Politics just released the most detailed survey thus far on Israelis and their outlook on the American election (full disclosure: the poll was done for the Knesset TV channel, and I assisted in authoring some of the questions). The bottom line is still what it was a week ago: unlike the case of all previous recent elections, in this cycle Israelis are supportive of the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton. 42% for her, 40% for Donald Trump, the GOP candidate. But in Israel’s case, much like in America’s, support is a function of political tendencies. Clinton is overwhelmingly supported by leftist Israelis (83%), and by centrists (44%-25%). But the Israeli right supports Trump – 53% to 32% for Clinton. This is so even though more Israelis, 44%, believe that the Republican Party is better for Israel (26% say the Democratic Party is better and 30% don’t know).

Now note an interesting phenomenon: while a majority of Israelis say “Clinton” when asked “if you had the right to vote in the American election who would you vote for?” – only a minority of Israelis believe that Clinton would be “a better President for Israel.” 46% of Israelis believe that Trump would be a better President for Israel – while a smaller 37% group believe that Clinton would be better for Israel. What does this tell us? One of two things: either some Israelis, more than a few, do not want the American President to be good for Israel. They are so pissed off with Israel’s policies that they want the American President to be he who is worse for Israel. Or some Israelis, more than a few, are so freaked out by Trump that they are willing to sacrifice the interests of their own country if that’s what it takes for America to have the better President for America (but one that is not as good for Israel).

There are, of course, other options too: that Israelis believe that what’s best for America is also best for Israel, and interpret the second question as a narrow question on the President’s relations with the government of Israel. Whatever they think, the right is more consistent: 53% would vote for Trump and 53% believe he’d be better for Israel. The center is the least consistent: centrist Israelis would vote for Clinton 44% to 25% for Trump – a 19% gap. But when asked about the next President and Israel, there is in fact a small gap in Trump’s favor: 41% of them believe he would be the better one, and 39% believe Clinton would be the better one.

How good do Israelis expect the American administration to be on Israel? It must be said – especially when we are just a few days after the signing of a new 10 year aid deal – that they expect a lot. Probably too much. Lazar asked Israelis if the US supports Israel too much, not enough, or just about the right amount. Israelis give an answer that seems, on the one hand, trivially human, but, on the other hand, somewhat greedy: 56% say the US is not supportive enough of Israel. Among right-wing Israelis the number goes up to 65%. I assume that this has a lot to do with the policies of the Obama administration and the way Israelis view them – keep reading if you want to know how low they rank the current President compared to his predecessors.

The only Israelis who tend to think that the US might be too supportive of Israel are left-wing Israelis. 12% of them answered this question with “too much.” But most of them, 51%, said “just about right.” By the way, 44% of Israelis also said that American Jews are not supportive enough of Israel – yet a larger number, 47%, said their support for Israel is at the right level. Right-wing Israelis are unsatisfied: 48% do not think that Israel is getting enough support from the Jews in the US (42% say it’s at the right level). The center is half satisfied, with 53% for “just about right” and 43% for “not enough.” The left is the only group of which fewer – 27% – say “not enough.” It is also the only group out of which a somewhat significant number, 12%, say that US Jewry supports Israel too much.

Lazar agreed to repeat a question we asked in April 2015 – more than a year ago – in which Israelis are asked to rank the best and the worst President for Israel since Jimmy Carter. The notable difference between the new poll and the old one – for which I have no explanation – is the sharp decline in Israel’s appreciation of George Walker Bush (Bush the 2nd). He is still ranked second in the list of best, but far behind Bill Clinton (that is one of the reasons why Hillary Clinton is doing so well with Israelis). 

Best for Israel

2015

2016

 Clinton

37%

35%

 Bush2

33%

19%

 Reagan

8%

12%

 Bush1

6%

10%

 Obama

3%

6%

 Carter

2%

3%

 Don’t Know

11%

14%

The worst for Israel is also a list that did not change much. Obama is doing a little better than last year, but is still, by far, the least appreciated by Israelis. One ought to have this number in mind as one considers Prime Minister Netanyahu’s calculations as he heads to his meeting with Obama on Wednesday: He is not going into a meeting with a highly-valued president such as Bill Clinton, with whom he clashed in the Nineties – he is going into a meeting with a President whom a majority of Israelis, disregarding the MOU, consider the worst since Carter (they probably think he is the worst ever, but we did not include other presidents in the survey).

Worst for Israel

2015

2016

  Obama

63%

53%

  Carter

16%

14%

  Bush1

4%

4%

  Bush2

3%

4%

  Reagan

2%

3%

 Clinton

0%

1%

 Don’t Know

12%

21%

The results are based on an internet survey, a representative sample of 503 Israelis. The margin of error is 4.4%.

Americans, you are not supportive enough of Israel! (Or so we ungrateful Israelis seem to think…) Read More »

‘Hamilton’ creator Lin-Manuel Miranda stars in new video — for Yeshiva University

It’s a question thousands of fans are undoubtedly asking themselves: What is Lin-Manuel Miranda, creator and star of the hip-hop musical “Hamilton,” up to now that he has left the insanely successful production? Could he be writing another biographical smash hit?

The answer may be surprising. In the short term, at least, he’s partnering up with a New York Jewish institution: Yeshiva University.

In addition to starring in a show that earned a record-setting 16 Tony nominations, Miranda can now also add Y.U.’s latest fundraising video to his resume. He narrates and appears in a video focused on the school’s 2016 Day of Giving slated for Sept. 20 and 21.

“Yeshiva University is a radiating force that is shaping our world,” Miranda says over footage of famous Jews, like Joe Lieberman and Alan Dershowitz, who have connections to the school.

But Miranda, who is Puerto Rican and not Jewish, has connections to the school, too. He grew up in Washington Heights — where the main Y.U. campus is located, and which served as the setting for his first hit, “In the Heights” — and his mother is an assistant professor at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine (which was, until earlier this year, part of Y.U.). Miranda has given guest lectures there and was given an honorary doctorate from the school in 2009, when he was 29  — making him the youngest ever to receive that honor from the university.

Of course, growing up in Washington Heights left him with plenty of Jewish connections outside of Y.U. He has previously said that all of his elementary school friends were Jewish and that he paid his rent before making it big by performing at bar mitzvahs. Then there’s his love for “Fiddler on the Roof,” which he has said heavily influenced “In the Heights.” He even surprised his wife at their wedding by singing “To Life (L’Chaim),” an upbeat tune from “Fiddler.”

“That’s what will be my real legacy,” Miranda said of his wedding stunt last year on CBS Sunday Morning. “It’s one of the things I’m proudest of in my life.”

So you never know, here’s to hoping his next musical is based on famous Jews.

‘Hamilton’ creator Lin-Manuel Miranda stars in new video — for Yeshiva University Read More »

New York bombing suspect Rahami captured in New Jersey

An Afghanistan-born American sought in connection with a bombing that wounded more than two dozen people in New York City and could be linked to other bombs found in New York and New Jersey was taken into custody on Monday after a shootout, a New Jersey mayor said.

Ahmad Khan Rahami of Elizabeth, New Jersey, was taken into custody after firing at police officer in Linden, New Jersey, about 20 miles outside New York, Elizabeth Mayor Chris Bollwage said.

Investigators believe more people were involved in the New York and New Jersey bombing plots, two U.S. officials told Reuters.

The New York Police Department had released a photo of Rahami, 28, and said they wanted to question him about a Saturday night explosion that wounded 29 people in Manhattan's Chelsea neighborhood and for a blast earlier that day in Seaside Park, New Jersey, authorities said.

New York bombing suspect Rahami captured in New Jersey Read More »

Trump wins first debate

Apparently, pretty much everyone I know is a bed-wetter.

The term gained currency in politics in January 2010 when Obama’s 2008 campaign manager, David Plouffe, in a Washington Post “>tweeted. “Clinton will enter August with strong electoral college advantage.” But that lead has since been blown, and now my in-box is positively leaking anxiety.  

Tell me Trump won’t win, my friends are emailing. It’s a slow-motion train wreck, they’re saying, and I feel helpless to stop it. Why is the media letting Trump get away with it? I wouldn’t be so nervous if it weren’t for Gary Johnson; if it weren’t for millennial apathy, for alt-right propaganda, for Paul Ryan’s cowardice; if it weren’t for sexism, racism, infotainment, Idiocracy, plutocracy, Citizens United, voter suppression…. Help!

Now comes the first debate, adding fresh impetus to stock up on mattress pads. Yet no matter what Clinton does, the Trump-wins-first-debate narrative has already been written:

– Trump and Clinton will share the same stage. He is not a normal candidate, or even a normal person. She is. No matter what happens during the debate, it is declared afterward that the one-on-one matchup has “normalized” Trump. So Trump wins.

– Because the bar for a successful Trump performance has been set so low, when Trump fails to threaten to punch Clinton, it is acclaimed as evidence of his presidential temperament and general election pivot.  Trump wins.

– Trump will attack Clinton. Clinton will defend herself. The verdict: Trump was strong; Clinton was on the defensive. But people want strength. Trump wins.

– The moderator, NBC’s Lester Holt, will call Trump on a lie. Trump will heap scorn on Holt, NBC, MSNBC, the Commission on Presidential Debates and the corrupt, dishonest media. Gallup – Clinton will nail Trump for lying. He’ll lie so much, she won’t be able to keep up with him. Fact-checkers will say, after the fact, that his pants were on fire, but it won’t matter. The debate will be scored for entertainment value, not truth-value. Clinton’s zingers will be called scripted. Trump’s taunts will be so uncivil, so beyond the political pale, so viciously funny, he will be crowned the change candidate in a change election year. Trump wins.

– Trump and Clinton will go after each other so relentlessly that the debate will be called a draw. But the Beltway consensus is that Clinton needs to win; Trump just needs to tie. So a tie is a win. Trump wins.

Even if Clinton wipes the floor with Trump, the media’s inherent bias is for suspense. The media business model requires capturing and keeping the audience’s attention, so corporations can sell our eyeballs to advertisers. It doesn’t matter how the debates go, or what the polls say; the press will portray the final stretch of this horserace as neck and neck, a photo finish, you won’t want to miss this, stay tuned.

Four years ago, I “>admitted on air, “We got played again by the Trump campaign, which is what they do.” No doubt Trump’s base loved that humiliation. But will the press ever learn? By the time the media figures out that its addiction to BREAKING NEWS is a standing invitation to be punked, the guy who’s gaming them may be sitting in the Oval Office.

I do see signs that Trump’s press bullying is losing octane. The Los Angeles Times’ lead story out of that birther event was headlined, “Trump trades one falsehood for two more,” and the New York Times led with “Trump Gives Up a Lie But Refuses to Repent.” If cable news covers the debates that unflinchingly, maybe Bed Bath & Beyond can let its inventory of waterproof bedding dwindle.


Marty Kaplan is the Norman Lear professor of entertainment, media and society at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. Reach him at martyk@jewishjournal.com.

Trump wins first debate Read More »

Golden moments at the Emmys

Emmy took a shine to Jewish talent Sunday evening as the prime-time television awards unfolded at the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles.

“Transparent,” the comedy series about a Jewish family whose father comes out as transgender, won trophies for director Jill Soloway and lead actor Jeffrey Tambor.

Jeffrey Tambor holds his award for Outstanding Lead Actor In A Comedy Series for “Transparent”  on Sept. 18, 2016. Photo by Lucy Nicholson/Reuters

Julia Louis-Dreyfus, who does not say she is Jewish but who is the daughter of Jewish billionaire Gerard Louis-Dreyfus and a relative of Alfred Dreyfus of the Dreyfus affair, was the winner as lead actress in a comedy series for her role in “Veep.” It was the fifth consecutive Emmy for the “Seinfeld” veteran, and her sixth in the category, a record. She now has eight Emmys. The actress announced in a tearful acceptance speech at the ceremony that her father had died only two days before.

Julia Louis-Dreyfus poses backstage with her awards for Outstanding Comedy Series and Outstanding Lead Actress In A Comedy Series for her role in HBO's “Veep” at the Emmy Awards on Sept. 18. Photo by Mike Blake/Reuters

Australian actor Ben Mendelsohn won the prize for supporting actor in a drama series (“Bloodlines”). He is the descendent of an old Prussian-Jewish family on his father’s side.

David Benioff and Daniel B. Weiss were honored for writing for the “Game of Thrones” episode “Battle of the Bastards.”

The Emmy went to Hank Azaria as guest actor in the drama series “Ray Donovan.”

Susanne Bier took top spot as director of “The Night Manager” in the limited series, movie or dramatic special category.

Among the evening’s disappointments was a strikeout for Amy Schumer, who had been nominated for four acting and writing awards, and the slighting of Larry David’s hilarious impression of Bernie Sanders on “Saturday Night Live.”

Golden moments at the Emmys Read More »

Medical Marijuana, Electric Buses and More- This Week from the Startup Nation

Israel Is High on Medical Marijuana

Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes Israeli entrepreneurs succeed because they challenge authority, question everything and don’t play by the rules. Schmidt’s statements not only apply to Israel’s high tech businesses and start-up companies, but also to its budding medical marijuana industry. From organic chemists to entrepreneurs, nearly everyone in Israel’s field of medical marijuana attributes at least a part of their success to Israel’s culture of rule-bending and not taking “no” for an answer.