fbpx

August 1, 2016

Despicable Donald—And The Multiple Philadelphias

Philadelphia is “The City of Brotherly Love.”

Philadelphia is the venue of the 2016 Democratic National Convention where Hillary Clinton has been nominated. Philadelphia, Mississippi, is the rural pesthole where local cops murdered and the KKK buried civil rights workers Chaney, Schwerner, and Goodman during Mississippi Freedom Summer of 1964. Philly Miss. is also where Despicable Donald sent his eldest son during the week of this year’s Democratic Convention to tell the Nashoba County Fair that he favors retaining the Confederate Flag on the Mississippi State Flag as a matter of “tradition.”

Also this week, I just was reminded of something watching The History Channel. Late in the Civil War, Confederate POW Camp Andersonville, where half the Union prisoners died and Swiss-born Commandant Henry Wirz was later executed as a war criminal (the Nuremberg defendants cited his defense of “just following orders”), a main reason for the lethal conditions, as well as for the lesser horrors at Union prisoner of war camps for Southern POWS, was that President Lincoln and General Grant felt morally compelled to halt transfer of captured POWS with the South, only after the Confederates refused to transfer black Union troops and their white officers, threatening instead to reenslave or hang them.

Watching the Democratic Convention in our historic Philly, Despicable Donald mused that Mrs. Khan, the Gold Star mother of a slain Iraqi Army veteran, was silenced from speaking with her husband because she was a Muslim. She has demurred in a press Conference and Washington Post op ed, explaining that she was just too heart sick to speak.

Now, an even more despicable creature in a right-wing news rag has denounced Hillary for not memorializing the slain Captain Khan back in 2004 when he was slain, and has equated Trump’s demeaning of Mrs. Khan and her religion with 2004 criticisms of mother of slain soldier Cyndy Sheehan for speaking up against George W. Bush. Talk about vicious non-sequiturs. By the way, George W. Bush never criticized Cindy Sheehan.

Bernie Sanders and now Trump has called the American presidential election system “rigged.” They are too kind. The best you can say about it this year is that it is “nutty” for nominating the likes of Despicable Donald.

And yet Trump could conceivably be elected president—given a stroke of God or the Devil. I saw again this week Stanley Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove or How I Learned to Love the Bomb (1964): and I retched rather than laughed.

Despicable Donald—And The Multiple Philadelphias Read More »

Was Israel wrong to drag its feet on the US aid package?

So who won the debate over Israel’s military aid package from the US for the next ten years? Reading media reports, like the one published by the Washington Post, the answer is clear: Netanyahu is the loser. And the WaPost was not the only newspaper to declare Israel’s defeat – or better say Netanyahu’s defeat. In almost all reports, the storyline is essentially the same, and quite accurate: the Israeli government was hesitant to sign the deal that was offered by the Obama administration. It kept trying to improve the deal, but the administration did not budge. At a certain point it became clear that there are only two options: sign the deal – or wait for the next administration in the hope of a better deal. Now, having exhausted all other options but waiting until next January, Netanyahu decided to take what was offered to him a long time ago.

Is this a triumph for the Obama administration? Surely it is. The administration agreed to certain terms, and stuck to these terms – some of which are, compared to the past, unfavorable to Israel. Israel will get a package more generous than previous packages, but there are two important caveats that make this hefty sum of money bitter-sweet. The first one is Israel’s commitment not to ask Congress for additions for this or that on top of the annual aid package. This means no playing around in the more hospitable corridors of Congress. The second one is even more painful: after five years, all of the package will be spent in the US – that is to say: Israel will no longer be able to support its local military industry by using US aid money.

These are no small surrenders, and the Prime Minister was reasonable in being unenthusiastic about them. The problem for him was simple, though – he was playing with a bad hand. First, he angered the administration by going to Congress to speak about Iran, draining away any shred of good will towards him (if any remained) on the part of the administration. Then he decided to wage the battle over Iran until the bitter end. And then he did not accept the notion that, since the battle is doomed to fail, the best option for him was to trade a deal that would mean more aid to Israel in exchange for less resistance against the administration on Iran.

Having lost that battle, Netanyahu decided to wait a little longer. He was hoping for one of two things: that the administration would feel more pressure to sign a deal under unfavorable political conditions (that is, so as not to hurt the Democrats’ chances of recapturing the White House) – or that the political race would make it likely that a better deal would be possible when election time is over.

Netanyahu lost every bet on every card in this process. The Iran deal was signed and approved. The Obama administration did not feel much pressure to reach a deal. The political process brought to the fore a Clinton and a Trump. One who is not likely to accommodate Netanyahu and Israel more than Obama did – and one whose policies are so unpredictable that Israel could end up facing a double-or-nothing situation. And of course, double would be great – but nothing is too big a risk. It is a risk that even Netanyahu (by the way, not usually a risk-taker) was not willing to take, surely not when both his Finance Minister and Defense Minister told him that they no longer support a delay.

Was this an irresponsible bet on the part of the Prime Minister? It is quite easy to look at the ultimate outcome of the process and assume that it was. But taking a more serious look at the range of options for Netanyahu, his bet was not irrational.

In fact, the bet should be considered a two-phase one. The first part of it was Netanyahu’s decision not to drop his quest to disrupt the agreement with Iran for financial compensation. That was a decision in which symbolism and principle played a big part. Israel cannot claim that a nuclear Iran is an existential threat and the next day take an extra two hundred million in aid and call it a day. Israel cannot ask its friends and supporters to raise hell against the deal and the next day declare that since chances of success in this battle are slim it is willing to accept the Iran deal as fact as long as it gets something in return.

The fight against the Iran deal – justified or not – was a strategic fight, but also one for the history books. If and when, god forbid, a nuclear Iran emerges, no one will be able to say that Israel did not issue the stringent warning it could issue – no one will be able to say that Israel did not really care and was willing to turn a blind eye as long as it got some more financial aid.

The second phase was not about principle; it was about tactics. And in the second phase Netanyahu gained little, and lost little. True, it seems foolish for him to insist on not signing a deal for so long and then come around and sign the deal that he was offered in the first place. Yet on the other hand – where is the damage? Netanyahu was waiting to see if better conditions might present an opportunity for a better deal, and only when he realized that such conditions are not likely to occur he agreed to take what he was offered.

True, the Obama administration was somewhat annoyed by Netanyahu’s approach. It grumbled and complained and briefed the press and pressured Netanyahu’s allies. But here the roles were reversed: Obama had little to lose by refusing to better the deal – Netanyahu had little to lose by letting the administration grumble. It’s not as if he had great relations with the administration and has now soiled them. It’s not as if the Obama administration was ready to promise him much – for example, on the Palestinian front – in return for signing the deal earlier rather than later. It’s not as if the PM was still hoping to salvage his image within the administration. Just like before, they think Netanyahu is an annoyance. Just like before, he has to compromise with an administration that he believes is less friendly than its predecessors.

So the bottom line is this: Netanyahu, and Israel, lost an opportunity when the PM decided not to trade Iran for aid – Netanyahu and Israel lost nothing when the PM decided, after Iran was over, to wait a little longer before accepting the Obama deal.

Was Israel wrong to drag its feet on the US aid package? Read More »

RJC ad ridicules Democrats for anti-Israel tone at convention

The Republican Jewish Coalition on Friday released a 60-second ad that highlights the display of a Palestinian flag on the floor of the convention and the burning of an Israeli flag outside the convention hall to make a point that today’s Democratic Party is less supportive of Israel than in the past. 

“Anti-Israel Democrats are on full display at the democratic convention,” the ad states. “While the Palestinian flag was waving inside the Democratic convention, the Israeli flag was burned right outside.” 

The Hillary Clinton campaign  RJC ad ridicules Democrats for anti-Israel tone at convention Read More »

DON’T THINK TWICE *Movie Review*

At its outset, DON’T THINK TWICE looks like a movie about the history of improvisation and an improv comedy.  Saying that, however, almost does it a disservice because it’s so much deeper than that.  DON’T THINK TWICE is about not just following your dreams, but what to do when your goals don’t quite materialize as hoped.  When one of a six-member improv group is cast on a SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE-esque show, the other members of the group struggle with what it means for them.

Mike Birbiglia (SLEEPWALK WITH ME) writes, directs and stars alongside Keegan-Michael Key (KEY AND PEELE), Gillian Jacobs (COMMUNITY), Kate Micucci, Chris Gethard and Tami Sagher (MADtv) in this fantastic film about life.

This week’s review also includes a special interview with Keegan-Michael Key about the movie, as well as some “insider” stories from Mike Birbiglia and Kate Micucci.  Take a look below:

—>Looking for the direct link tp the video?  Click here.

DON’T THINK TWICE *Movie Review* Read More »

Amar’e Stoudemire signs two-year deal with Hapoel Jerusalem basketball team

Amar’e Stoudemire, who retired from the NBA last week, has signed a two-year deal with the Hapoel Jerusalem basketball team.

The team announced the deal on its website on Monday. It did not disclose terms of the deal.

Stoudemire has been a minority owner of Hapoel Jerusalem since 2013.  As part of his contract with Hapoel Jerusalem, Stoudemire will sell his shares in the club to Dr. Ori Allon, president and majority owner of the team.

“I am looking forward to playing for Hapoel Jerusalem and helping the team compete for titles,” said Stoudemire. “My family and I are excited to start a new journey in Israel, a country I have grown to love.”

Currently led by coach Simone Pianigiani, Hapoel Jerusalem is one of the oldest and most successful teams in the Israeli Basketball League, according to its website. The club has won numerous Israeli State and League Cups, as well as one Israeli Championship and one EuroCup title.

“We are thrilled to have a player of Amar’e’s caliber join our team, solidifying our place among the top echelon of Israeli and European basketball,” Allon said in a statement. “More importantly, bringing Amar’e to Jerusalem raises the profile of the entire Israeli Basketball League, and we hope that his joining our team will lead to increased interest in our league from basketball fans around the world as well as talented international players.”

Stoudemire is scheduled to travel to Israel next week as part of a charity project of NBA Cares. The project is organized by the foundation of Omri Casspi of the Sacramento Kings, the first Israeli to play in the NBA.

In 2010, after joining the New York Knicks, Stoudemire told the New York Post that he had become “spiritually and culturally Jewish.” The All-Star said he was keeping kosher and would celebrate the High Holy Days. He traveled to Israel that year after discovering that his mother appeared to have Jewish ancestry.

Stoudemire, 33, is a six-time NBA All-Star who played in the league for 14 years, retiring last week as a Knick. His first eight seasons were with the Phoenix Suns. Stoudemire closed out his career playing a season each in Dallas and Miami.

Amar’e Stoudemire signs two-year deal with Hapoel Jerusalem basketball team Read More »

2016 Olympics: Israel’s largest-ever delegation is ready for Rio

When the 2016 Olympic Games open here on Friday evening, Israel will proudly show off its largest delegation ever, with 47 athletes competing in 17 sports.

Among them are golfer Laetitia Beck, the granddaughter of a Holocaust survivor; Lonah Chemtai, a Kenyan-born marathoner, and Ron Darmon, the first triathlete to represent Israel at the Olympic Games.

Israelis and Jews around the world are expected to show their support for the team, which failed to medal in 2012 when the Israeli delegation numbered 37. Some 10,000 Israeli tourists are expected to attend the Games — they will join Rio’s nearly 40,000-strong Jewish community, along with other Jewish supporters from across Brazil and around the world.

“We are a small team compared to other countries, but we have quality and are determined,” Israeli Olympic Committee President Igal Carmi told the delegation during a meeting in Jerusalem at Israeli President Reuven Rivlin’s residence on July 13 before departing to Brazil. “I am very proud of the Israeli team. We are ready to compete at the highest levels.”

One of Israel’s top Olympic hopes, rhythmic gymnast Neta Rivkin, will hold the Israeli flag at the opening ceremony.

“When I was told, I felt I was fulfilling another personal dream,” she said at the meeting. “On behalf of all the athletes, I can promise that we will all do our very best. We all want to bring moments of joy to the Israeli people.”

Some of Israel’s competitors arrived in Brazil early to acclimatize to the Brazilian climate and setting. Preferring to avoid the Rio fuss, many made their temporary homes in Sao Paulo, the country’s largest city and its financial capital — not to be confused with its actual capital city, Brasilia — and home to its largest Jewish population.

Although 250 miles away from the Olympic Village in Rio, Sao Paulo’s Hebraica — a massive complex that’s somewhat akin to a Jewish community center — was chosen as a pre-games training camp for the Israeli and Japanese swimming, water polo, basketball, gymnastics, handball, judo, shooting, tennis and volleyball teams.

“Half of the Israeli delegation will train at Hebraica,” said Avi Gelberg, the sports club’s president. “We are very proud as Jews to be able to be close to the Israeli athletes, help their preparation and – why not? – contribute to their achievements.”

Aside from leading the world’s largest Jewish sports club, Gelberg, who was born in Haifa, also presides over the Maccabi organization in Brazil.

“Welcoming the Olympic Games is a big pride,” he said. “Despite political issues, corruption, Zika, pollution and so on, I am sure Brazil will make excellent Games the same way we did with the World Soccer Cup here in 2014.

“Israel will be able to present itself in a positive way much beyond the conflicts,” added Gelberg, who will also serve as the Israeli delegation’s attaché.

Israel’s delegation also includes 34 coaches and about 25 support staff.

In 16 Olympic Games, Israel has won seven medals — in judo, sailing and canoeing. The only gold medalist was windsurfer Gal Fridman (Athens, 2004), who also won a bronze medal in Atlanta in 1996.

Not even the recent news about Islamist terrorists — who have issued directives to “lone wolves” to carry out attacks against the Israeli delegation  — nor the imprisonment of 12 people in Brazil who allegedly pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group via social media seem to be a concern for some Israeli delegation members.

“We have no issues about security or whatsoever. Not at all. We feel very safe. But we obviously cannot speak too much about it,” Danny Oren, sport director of the Israeli delegation, told JTA.

Oren and the entire delegation — and, well, pretty much everyone — are looking forward to the opening ceremony on Friday night. However, they won’t be joined by Israel’s most senior official expected to attend the Games. Miri Regev, Israel’s minister of culture and sport, who is not observant, caught everyone by surprise when she announced on July 24 she won’t violate Shabbat.

“Shabbat, our national day of rest, is one of the most important gifts that Jewish people have given to the culture of humanity,” she said in a statement. “As the representative of the State of Israel, the sole Jewish state on the planet, I unfortunately cannot take part in the opening ceremony of the Olympics because it would require me to break the holy Sabbath.”

It’s not clear if she will be the only one to miss the event — but Oren insists that, if it happens, it’s purely out of a competitive, not religious, spirit. “If this or that athlete decides not to attend, it will be for the fact it finishes very late and they will have a competition early in the morning on Saturday,” Oren said.

Regev’s presence is confirmed, however, for one of the most highly anticipated moments for Israelis in Rio: A ceremony to honor the 11 Israelis killed at the 1972 Munich Olympics will be held at Rio’s City Hall on Aug. 14. It will be co-led by the International Olympic Committee along with the Olympic committees of Israel and Brazil.

“The mayor will open the doors of his house in a gesture of great friendship with the Brazilian Jewish community and the whole people of Israel,” Israel’s honorary consul in Rio, Osias Wurman, told JTA.

At the team’s sendoff at the president’s house in Jerusalem, Regev spoke about countries, which she chose not to name, that do not recognize Israel and do not permit their athletes to compete against Israelis,

“Unfortunately, there are countries, even today, that exploit the Olympic Games for political gain and discriminate against Israeli athletes,” Regev lamented. “This represents the new anti-Semitism and we need to fight it. When you are at the fields and halls of the [Olympic] events, remember that an entire country back at home is praying for your success.”

 

Added Rivlin: “Your preparation has been superb, and now is the time to reap the fruit of your efforts. We believe in you and know that you can and will return home with Olympic medals.”

2016 Olympics: Israel’s largest-ever delegation is ready for Rio Read More »

Peres: Trump’s foreign policy proposals would be ‘a very great mistake’

Israel’s former president Shimon Peres said carrying out Donald Trump’s isolationist foreign policy vision would be “a very great mistake.”

In an interview with Bloomberg.com published Monday, Peres — who is 93 and served in numerous roles in Israel’s government since its founding in 1948 — did not refer to the Republican presidential nominee by name.

But asked about Trump’s statements on foreign policy, the Nobel Peace Prize winner said, “To suggest that America will disconnect her relations with NATO, that America will leave the whole field open to other countries — in my judgment it’s a mistake. A very great mistake.”

Last month Trump suggested in an interview with The New York Times that U.S. military support for NATO member states might be conditional on whether those members’ fulfill their obligations to the bloc.

During the interview, Peres, who turns 93 on Tuesday, also addressed other topics, such as a project he’s working on that seeks to bring together Israeli and Arab tech entrepreneurs.

“We want to make not just a Startup Nation, but a Startup Region,” Peres said of his project, the Israeli Innovation Center. “Science doesn’t have flags. Science doesn’t have borders.”

Asked about the Palestinian Authority ’s threats to sue Great Britain over the 1917 Balfour Declaration, Peres compared the move to refighting the Crusades, the medieval battles for control of the Holy Land.

“The past is dead,” he said. “The future is the agenda.”

Peres: Trump’s foreign policy proposals would be ‘a very great mistake’ Read More »

Palestinian man threatening Israeli soldiers with knife shot and killed

A Palestinian man who attempted to stab Israeli soldiers monitoring a West Bank checkpoint was shot and killed by the troops.

On Sunday, after parking a car at the Hawara checkpoint near Nablus, he exited the vehicle and ran toward the nearby soldiers while brandishing a knife, Palestinian witnesses told the Palestinian Maan news agency. The soldiers shot and killed the man, who was identified as Rami Muhammad Zaim Awartani, 31, according to Maan. He reportedly was shot in the chest.

The Israel Defense Forces said that no one else was injured in the attempted attack and it would investigate the incident.

The incident occurred less than a week after a woman carrying a knife ran at security guards at the Qalandiya checkpoint between the northern West Bank and Jerusalem was shot in the legs after ignoring several calls to stop, according to Israel Police. The woman was treated at the scene of the July 26 incident and arrested. She was taken to a Jerusalem hospital for treatment of her light injuries.

The woman was carrying a green scarf with the logo of the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas.

Palestinian man threatening Israeli soldiers with knife shot and killed Read More »

Who needs Wonder Woman when there’s Hillary Clinton?

I love that her superhero costume was bridal white, the eternal symbol of her gender; recalling both the fight for women’s suffrage and the institution of marriage, that for too long was the only way to lift women out of obscurity and into society.

I love that white wears ironic on her, because her marriage has both helped and hurt her. And because, when she spoke at the convention, Hillary Clinton was no man’s bride: She was a woman of history, a promise to the passionate that even if you’ve been beaten down, you can still triumph. And she dressed fittingly – fresh, luminous, new — for her wedding to our country.

I love that she began her speech as a mother, with gratitude and acknowledgment, starting with the most important person in her life — her child. I love that she’s the kind of leader who honors others for their role in her success. And that she’s the kind of person who can say of her onetime rival, President Barack Obama, “I’m better because of his friendship.” And I love that she chose to validate her latest rival, Bernie Sanders, with powerful words of promise: “You put economic and social justice issues front and center where they belong,” she said, telling his supporters, “I’ve heard you: Your cause is our cause.”

I love that despite what anyone says, she is still — by law — a wife. And she understands her complicated relationship to her complicated husband as a “conversation.” One that started in a law library 45 years ago and which, she said, has lasted “through good times that filled us with joy, and hard times that tested us.” It doesn’t get more honest or transparent than that.

I love that when the crowd cheered for her, she held her hand to her heart and that her smile was as wide as the cheers were wild.

I love that as a candidate she offers substance, experience and intelligence in abundance; that her policy positions are so studied and meticulous, I am confident that she can handle any worldly challenge and any world leader. Hillary doesn’t just say what she’ll do; she tells you how she’ll do it.

I love that when the House Select Committee grilled her during an 11-hour marathon hearing on Benghazi last October, she turned a pressure cooker into a political parley, and was so well prepared, answering question after question with wit and wisdom, she changed the hearing intended to destroy her into a prime-time presidential platform.

I love that her scandals have become meaningless to me. I don’t care that she had a private email server or that the Clinton Foundation has received donations from Gulf States, or that she earned money from Wall Street speeches. I don’t believe her commitment to public service and working class families is tempered in any way by self-interest and ambition. People are more than one thing, and I trust her moral commitment to the underserved, overlooked and ill-treated. I love how absurd it is that no matter how much measurable good she does — whether getting healthcare to children, recourse to sexual assault survivors, or support for 9/11 responders — conspiracy theories regarding her motives abound unabated by facts.

I love how she’s accused of flip-flopping positions out of political expediency when really it demonstrates her ability to change and grow and compromise. I love that her mistakes stem from her commitment to a 40-year career that has only increased in responsibility, prestige and influence. And that the people who criticize her for every little thing fail to see that her life of public service has demanded more of her as a person and citizen than most of us would ever want or allow.   

I love that she went undercover in a segregated school to study the role of race in education – 30 years ago. And that she advocated for universal healthcare a decade before Obama was even elected to the Senate.

I love that she is fiercely smart, ultra savvy, and hyper-qualified to run for president of the United States.

I love that loving her puts me into a club with Meryl Streep and Lena Dunham.

I love that when I tried to take notes during her speech, I couldn’t stop crying. Because I know what this means to my 93-year-old grandmother, who carved her own set of cracks in that stubborn ceiling. And I know what it would have meant to my mother, who worked hard and sacrificed, but knew too well the disadvantages dealt to women, to finally see her role model and idol accept the nomination for president. I cried because I know that this nomination means – for every woman in America and around the world who has been told, “No,” who has been paid less, who has been passed over, ignored, belittled, ridiculed, humiliated, raped, shoved aside, manipulated, exploited, cheated on, disbelieved and discounted – that a woman can rise to the world’s most powerful position. That the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards equal opportunity for all.

I love that a woman has what it takes to lead our country. I love that our next president might be blonde, wear mascara and drape jewels around her neck.

I love the hope, possibility and wonder Hillary’s story inspires: “When there is no ceiling, the sky is the limit.”


Danielle Berrin is a senior writer and columnist at the Jewish Journal.

Who needs Wonder Woman when there’s Hillary Clinton? Read More »

Uneasy Republicans and confident Democrats diverge on ‘Jewish’ issues

It’s never been easy for Jewish Republicans. Jews have broken overwhelmingly for Democratic candidates since Woodrow Wilson. Despite rising American Jewish affluence, usually a harbinger of conservative voting patterns, a plurality self-defines as liberal.

Republican Jews have poured millions into upping their share of the Jewish vote in recent elections, portraying the GOP as the pro-Israel party and telling largely affluent Jewish Americans to vote their economic self-interest. The needle has only moved a little, despite those efforts: 80 percent of Jews voted Clinton in 1992, 79 percent voted Gore in 2000 and 74 percent voted Obama in 2008.

Organizations like the Republican Jewish Coalition have kept pushing despite it all. Most Jews don’t vote primarily based on Israel, but as Democrats passed a controversial Iran deal and condemned Israel’s West Bank occupation, Republicans saw a window of opportunity.

Republicans doubled down on the Israel case at their national convention in Cleveland last month. Donald Trump, Mike Pence and a handful of other speakers included lines in support of Israel in their speeches and drew loud applause. President Barack Obama’s support of Iran’s nuclear program, anathema to the Israeli government, was a nightly punching bag.

Dozens of delegates told JTA that the main reason Jews should vote Trump is that he’s better on Israel than his opponent, Hillary Clinton. The Republican platform swung right on Israel, eliminating the long-held bipartisan consensus supporting the two-state solution, and rejecting the United States’ right to dictate terms on Israeli-Palestinian peace.

Even so, Republican Jewish uneasiness showed at the convention. Big-name Jewish donors declined to attend. Republican Jews, from journalists Bill Kristol and Jennifer Rubin to former Republican operatives like Noam Neusner and David Frum, oppose Trump. The Republican Jewish Coalition held no events that were open to the media, a departure from previous conventions.

Much of this ambivalence has to do with Trump’s string of statements insulting minorities — Jews among them. It’s a point Democrats stressed every day of their confab a week later in Philadelphia. A video aired on the first night of the their convention featuring Trump’s retweet of an image widely called anti-Semitic. The convention’s explicit message was that anyone who cares about safeguarding minority rights has to vote Clinton.

The first night of the Democratic National Convention featured a string of Jewish public figures — Sarah Silverman and Sen. Al Franken among them — and it ended with a keynote speech by Bernie Sanders, the first Jewish candidate to win a major party primary. Jewish entertainers, activists and politicians peppered every night’s roster, from singer Paul Simon to Senator Barbara Boxer.

Criticism of Israel was a recurring feature in Philadelphia, a point the RJC pressed in an ad released last week calling the party “stridently anti-Israel.” Many Sanders supporters wore pro-Palestinian stickers, and a few advocated changing the United States’ historically pro-Israel policy. On Wednesday, a night devoted largely to national security, no one mentioned the U.S. alliance with Israel. There was full-throated support for the Iran deal throughout the convention. At one point, protesters outside the convention burned an Israeli flag. At a roundtable discussion held outside the convention by the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and the American Friends Service Committee, Georgia Rep. Hank Johnson compared Israel’s West Bank settlement movement to termites.

But in the end, the party could point to the ways it shored up its traditional pro-Israel wing. The Democratic platform committee rejected an effort to even mention settlements and occupation in its section on Israel. Like Trump, Clinton threw a shout-out to Israel’s security into her acceptance speech, and didn’t mention Palestinians. Gen. John Allen, the former commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, gave a convention speech in support of Clinton  that echoed neoconservative rhetoric, which tends to be forcefully pro-Israel. Even Bill Clinton got into the act, sporting a Hebrew “Hillary” button during Obama’s Wednesday night speech.

It could be that, in future election cycles, discord over Israel will drive more Jews to the Republican party. Part of Sanders’ dissent from Democratic orthodoxy was in his call for more criticism of Israel. In her acceptance speech, Clinton adopted much of his domestic rhetoric but none of his Middle East policies. But if Sanders delegates become the new Democratic mainstream, the party could gravitate away from its pro-Israel stance.

At Jewish Democratic events, though, the old guard held sway. If anything, the Democratic Jews’ biggest problem came from one of their own, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who was ousted as chair of the Democratic National Committee at the convention’s start. Wasserman Schultz was the favorite daughter of Jewish Dems, a former National Jewish Democratic Council staffer who rose to be a congresswoman and party bigwig. Now, she’s facing a primary challenge and could exit political life.

Even as she was embattled, the NJDC stood with her, presenting her with an award on the convention’s final afternoon. Wasserman Schultz sounded defiant at the event, calling Trump a traitor and promising to win her primary. And despite her fall from grace, Jewish Democrats cheered her, as if to say that whatever the future held, they felt good about this year.

Uneasy Republicans and confident Democrats diverge on ‘Jewish’ issues Read More »