fbpx

July 14, 2016

Black and blue (and white)

This has been a bruising time to be an American. One video after another records white police officers killing African-Americans. One man while restrained flat on the ground, a second in his car with his girlfriend and her young daughter in the surrounding seats. In neither of these two incidents were the Black men threatening the officers. Within days, we also witnessed an assault on the police officers of Dallas —five officers killed in the very moment they were protecting the rights of angry Americans protesting police brutality.

We are swimming in blood. Ancient American fault lines — of race, wealth, privilege and violence — are ripping open before our weeping eyes. Whatever progress toward healing the rifts we thought we might have achieved seems vulnerable to the new assaults and the rage they reflect. Whatever coalitions we have built seem fragile in the face of new realizations of inequality, race hatred and access to too accessible weapons of mass destruction.

In this storm, we seek haven. Perhaps Jewish tradition contains some wisdom to help us find the path toward healing, to guide us toward policies of true tzedek u-mishpat (justice and equity)? Perhaps if we train ourselves to see through heaven’s perspective, we might discern the way out of this ancient ruin? During these dry summer months, it is a Jewish tradition read the Mishnah’s compilation of rabbinic wisdom, Pirke Avot, “The Teachings of the Sages.” Let their perspective elevate our own.

We Didn’t Cause It; But We Have to Fix It

It is not for you to complete the task,

but neither are your free to stand aside 

from it (M. Avot 2:21).

Each of us was born into a world we did not fashion. We did not invent the social structure that privileges some and marginalizes others, nor did we launch the democratic structures that make progress possible. The problems, the creativity and the institutions all were created by the generations before us. We are their heirs, to both the good and the bad. Regarding the problems, we are not guilty. But we are responsible. How we respond to the reality we find ourselves facing, how we take the democratic institutions our forebears created and advance a vision of greater justice, greater inclusion, greater peace is very much ours to determine. Those choices will also constrain and empower our children’s generation. What we do matters. We honor those who came before us, and enhance those who will come after us, by making good choices now.

Truth, Justice and Peace

The world stands on three virtues:

on justice, on truth, and on peace

(M. Avot 1:18).

We cannot heal our social divisions if we don’t begin with justice as our goal, with truth as our standard and with peace as our way.

Our goal must be a society in which someone’s race doesn’t matter and yet matters very much. That is, vis-à-vis one’s rights as citizen, one’s race should be irrelevant. But as a matter of identity, culture and pride, one’s race and community matters equally for each citizen and deserves honor and attention from society at large. Those twin poles, legal irrelevance and cultural prominence, direct us toward the end of our journey, toward which our efforts must point.

Truth means recognizing a second bipolar reality. On the one hand, we have made great progress as a society. African-Americans now serve as leaders in scholarship, industry, government, education and a host of other arenas. Our nations has benefited from African-Americans as Supreme Court justices, secretaries of state, president of the United States, just to name three prominent possibilities that have opened within the last half century. Legal battles won for voting rights, access to fair housing and equal education have made a real difference, to be noted and affirmed. But these changes are not nearly enough. The rate by which African-Americans get pulled over by police for often-minor offenses, get arrested for those offenses and the length of their sentences and their rate of incarceration is markedly different than for white Americans. But on the ground, the rates of violence against Blacks is significantly higher than it is for other races. Access to healthy and affordable food, to affordable housing, to quality education is still largely correlated to race and income.

A commitment to the standard of truth also requires recognition that while most Americans oppose racism, the culture marinated in racist belief and practice for so long that we are all infected by its residue. In 1775, when Patrick Henry sought to defend the new democracy, he chastised his fellow (white) Virginians, that they should be men and not slaves. As with his fellow Founding Fathers, African slavery was not marginal to his identity, it was at the core of his sense of what a worthy American is not: not a slave, not a Black person. For centuries, that fault line, slave/free, defined the nation’s sense of democracy. Even the Constitution defined a Black person as only 3/5th human, and a later Supreme Court decision made clear that no slave or descendant of slaves could ever be a citizen. The pervasive sense of Blacks as inferior, suspect, alien, runs through the very core of American democracy. Even Jesse Jackson acknowledged that he responds differently to the sound of footsteps on the street if he turns and sees a young Black man than if he sees someone who is white. We all are infected by a racism that seeps out of our subconscious, our assumptions, our split-second reactions. Even though pretty much all of us are opposed to racism, the residue remains just under the surface.

To acknowledge these truths is not to foment a race war, it is simply to root ourselves in truth. America is not yet a level playing field, and truth requires us to acknowledge that there is much work yet to do.

Justice requires that we keep the goal of equality, diversity and shared values firmly in place. Truth requires acknowledging the chasm between what ought to be and what is. And peace reflects the American conviction that the locus of value lies in each individual person. If liberty is built one person at a time, then we must respect the rights of every person, starting with their right to life, to security, to well-being. Demonizing groups, whether racial groups, police officers or religious groups, or attacking people for belonging to those groups, is an assault on democracy itself, a rejection of what is holy and good in our heritage as Americans. Our republic depends on the rule of law, but law that reflects equity and justice for all.

Seeing With Another’s Eyes

Do not withdraw from the community;

Do not be sure of yourself until the day
your death;

Do not judge your fellow human beings

until you have stood in their place
(M. Avot 2: 5).

For us to begin the work of our time, to take America forward as a land of liberty for all and of true justice, we must recognize that our own take on the world is informed by our personal perspective, our distinctive history, our particular communities. To reach beyond the endless loop of our own perspective requires us to listen to others, to imagine ourselves as them, and to ask them to inform us about what their lives, communities and struggles mean to them. We have to learn to question our own fundamental assertions, looking for our own blind spots while seeking out others who can help us stand in their place, if only in sympathy, if only momentarily.

If we can nudge ourselves to build communities beyond the boundaries of our own group, our own faith, our own professional circle, so that our circles of belonging include those who are not like us, who look different than we do, whose faith or traditions are not our own, so we can open our hearts to their point of view even as we insist they extend that same circle of grace to us. It is surely no coincidence that the metastases of racist, anti-Semitic or mysogynistic words and deeds have erupted simultaneously. We cannot remove this malignancy of hatred if we are each isolated and self-focused. We have a possibility of expanding the American promise into something more expansive and grand than the one we inherited, but only if we join together.

We Jews can hone our ability to see through the eyes of another, to stand in their place, by finding members of the African-American community to join in conversation, in shared gathering, in renewed commitment to democracy, the rule of law and equality, to engaged dialogue in which we do more listening than speaking.

And in that regard, we all need to listen to the voices of law enforcement officers, too. These brave men and women risk their lives out of an idealistic commitment to making our streets safe for all of us. They are constrained by the same social nexus that impacts us all, but they stand on the front lines, and they manifest higher values and greater courage than most of us. The vast majority of our police forces seek the greater good, and we need to listen to them, as well: What can we do to help them do their jobs better, to achieve their goals of service and safety on behalf of us all? We need to hear their voices and work with them for the common good.

The Future Depends on Each of Us

If I am not for me, who will be?

If I am only for myself, what am I?

And if not now, when? (M. Avot 1:14)

In the end, there is no clear boundary around what counts as American values. We will determine which values make the cut by our own actions, our own participation, our own shared struggle for justice. Similarly, the American story doesn’t have a conclusion; each generation writes the subsequent chapter, which constrains and empowers the following generation while allowing for new options to emerge from the heritage of the past. Our generation can take its inheritance: — a legacy of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, of all men being created equal. But we have also been dealt a legacy of slavery, of Jim Crow, of segregation and privilege, and we can determine what that past will mean because of the future we choose to make real.

If we want our children  — and others’ — to live in a world of peace and harmony, of creativity and decency, then we must fashion that world now. Our parents were able to wrest greater justice and opportunity in their time. Together with our brothers and sisters in the African-American community, with the men and women of the police forces, with other faith communities, we face that same possibility today.

It is our time. If not now, when?

RABBI BRADLEY SHAVIT ARTSON holds the Abner and Roslyn Goldstine Dean’s Chair of the Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies and is vice president of American Jewish University. He hosts “Higher Ground,” the university’s video series offering spiritual perspectives on contemporary social issues.

Black and blue (and white) Read More »

Breaking Bodies

Leave my body alone.

This is my thought when I see terror.

I don’t care if it’s a truck, a gun, a knife, a bomb.

Just leave my body alone.

Do not slice my flesh.

Do not splinter my bones or explode my arteries.

Do not rape my muscles and ligaments.

We talk about ISIS and Islam and hatred.

But hatred doesn’t bother me.

What bothers me is a bullet that pierces my pancreas.

Or a car that severs my spine.

Madness doesn’t bother me.

A sharp knife launched into my belly bothers me.

Or a rock that cracks my skull.

I don’t care about pundits or faith or interfaith.

About stereotypes or damage control.

I care about a bomb blowing next to my brain.

Or a white truck crunching 84 bodies.

Terrorists are not cowards,

They are artists of death.

Do not call them animals.

Animals kill to eat,

Terrorists kill to break bodies.

Animals do not want to die.

Terrorists?

What shall we do with them?

We can leave their faith and minds alone,

But we cannot leave their bodies alone.

We must break their bodies,

Even if they want us to.

David Suissa is president of TRIBE Media Corp./Jewish Journal and can be reached at davids@jewishjournal.com.

Breaking Bodies Read More »

Truck attack kills 80 in Nice on Bastille Day

A gunman killed 80 people and wounded scores when he drove a heavy truck at high speed into a crowd that had watched Bastille Day fireworks in the French Riviera city of Nice late on Thursday, officials said.

Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said 80 people died and 18 were in a critical condition. Many more were also wounded in the attack along the famed seafront Promenade des Anglais as the fireworks ended just after 10:30 p.m. (2030 GMT).

The driver also opened fire before police shot him dead.

In a pre-dawn address to the nation, President Francois Hollande said he was calling up military and police reservists to relieve forces worn out by an eight-month state of emergency begun after the Islamic State militant group killed 130 people in Paris. The state of emergency was extended by three months.

“France is filled with sadness by this new tragedy,” Hollande said, noting several children were among the dead in what he said he had no doubt was an act of terrorism.

He called the carnage, which came as France celebrated the anniversary of the 1789 revolutionary storming of the Bastille, an attack on liberty by fanatics who despised human rights.

France would, nonetheless, continue military operations in Syria and Iraq.

Counter-terrorist investigators were seeking to identify the driver. A local government official said weapons and grenades were found inside the 25-tonne, unmarked articulated truck.

Officials said hundreds were hurt as the driver wove along the seafront, knocking them down “like skittles”.

The attack, which came eight months and a day after Islamic State gunmen and suicide bombers struck the French capital on a festive Friday evening, seemed so far to be the work of a lone assailant. Newspaper Nice-Matin quoted unidentified sources as saying the driver was a 31-year-old local of Tunisian origin.

Police were working to establish what accomplices he may have had in a city with a reputation for Islamist activism.

There had been no claim of responsibility made almost six hours after the attack.

“A SCENE OF HORROR”

The truck careered for hundreds of metres along the front facing the Baie des Anges (Bay of Angels), slamming into families and friends listening to an orchestra or strolling above the beach towards the grand, century-old Hotel Negresco.

“It's a scene of horror,” member of parliament Eric Ciotti told France Info radio, saying the truck “mowed down several hundred people.” Jacques, who runs Le Queenie restaurant on the seafront, told the station: “People went down like ninepins.”

Bystander Franck Sidoli, who was visibly shocked, said: “I saw people go down.”

“Then the truck stopped, we were just five metres away. A woman was there, she lost her son. Her son was on the ground, bleeding,” he told Reuters at the scene.

Nice-Matin posted photographs of the truck, its windshield starred by a score of bullets and its radiator grille destroyed.

Major events in France have been guarded by troops and armed police since the Islamic State attacks last year, but it appeared to have taken many minutes to halt the progress of the truck as it tore along pavements and a pedestrian zone.

Police told residents of the city, 30 km (20 miles) from the Italian border, to stay indoors as they conducted further operations, although there was no sign of any other attack.

Hours earlier, Hollande had said the state of emergency would end in two weeks. He has now extended it by three months, calling up former troops and gendarmes after racing back to Paris from the south of France in the wake of the attack.

Islamic State militants killed 130 people in Paris on Nov. 13, the bloodiest in a number of attacks in France and Belgium in the past two years. On Sunday, a weary nation had breathed a collective sigh of relief as the month-long Euro 2016 soccer tournament across France ended without a feared attack.

Four months ago, Belgian Islamists linked to the Paris attackers killed 32 people in Brussels.

Vehicle attacks have been used by isolated members of militant groups in recent years, notably in Israel, as well as in Europe, though never to such devastating effect.

U.S. President Barack Obama said in a statement: “On behalf of the American people, I condemn in the strongest terms what appears to be a horrific terrorist attack in Nice, France, which killed and wounded dozens of innocent civilians.”

The United Nations Security Council said it “condemned in the strongest terms the barbaric and cowardly terrorist attack”.

On social media, Islamic State supporters celebrated the high death toll.

HIDING IN TERROR

One woman told France Info that she and others had fled in terror: “The lorry came zig-zagging along the street. We ran into a hotel and hid in the toilets with lots of people.”

Nice-Matin journalist Damien Allemand had been watching the traditional seaside firework display when the truck tore by just as it ended. After taking cover in a cafe, he wrote on his paper's website of what he saw when he came back out on the promenade: “Bodies every five metres, limbs … Blood. Groans.”

“The beach attendants were first on the scene. They brought water for the injured and towels, which they placed on those for whom there was no more hope.”

Officials have warned in the past of the risk of Islamist attacks in the region following the Paris and Brussels attacks. Reverses for Islamic State in Syria and Iraq have raised fears it might strike again in Europe, possibly again using alienated young men from the continent's Arab immigrant communities whom it has inspired to take up arms against their native countries.

Nice, a city of some 350,000, has a history as a flamboyant, aristocratic resort but is also a gritty metropolis. It has seen dozens of its Muslim residents travel to Syria to fight, a path taken by previous Islamic State attackers in Europe.

“Neither the place nor the date are coincidental,” a former French intelligence agent and security consultant, Claude Moniquet, told France-Info, noting the jihadist presence in Nice and the fact that July 14 marks France's revolution.

“Tragic paradox that the subject of Nice attack was the people celebrating liberty, equality and fraternity,” European Council President Donald Tusk said on Twitter.

At Nice's Pasteur hospital, medical staff were treating large numbers of injuries. Waiting for friends who were being operated on, 20-year-old Fanny told Reuters she had been lucky.

“We were all very happy, ready to celebrate all night long,” she said. “I saw a truck driving into the pedestrian area, going very fast and zig-zagging.

“The truck pushed me to the side. When I opened my eyes I saw faces I didn't know and started asking for help … Some of my friends were not so lucky. They are having operations as we speak. It's very hard, it's all very traumatic.”

Truck attack kills 80 in Nice on Bastille Day Read More »

Interfaith coalition urges Senate action on Supreme Court vacancy

Fifteen Jewish groups joined an interfaith coalition in calling on the Senate Judiciary Committee to consider President Barack Obama’s nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court.

During a conference call Thursday, 40 national and state religious organizations urged senators to hold a swift hearing and vote on the nomination of Merrick Garland, who is Jewish, to fill the court vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

Republican lawmakers have vowed to block the nomination process on Garland, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, saying the vacancy should be filled by the next president.

“While many of our groups do not take positions on individual nominees, we stand united in our belief that the Senate’s duties regarding Supreme Court vacancies ought to be carried out in a timely fashion,” according to a statement by the coalition. “The Senate’s ongoing delay in fulfilling this responsibility threatens the ability of our government to operate at full capacity and undermines our nation’s commitment to the pursuit of justice and democracy.”

The Jewish groups signing on to the statement are the Anti-Defamation League, Bend the Arc, Central Conference of American Rabbis, the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association, Reconstructionist Rabbinical College, the Shamayim V’Aretz Institute, Women of Reform Judaism, Union for Reform Judaism, Uri L’Tzedek, Hadassah New Orleans, The Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action, the Jewish Community Relations Council of New Haven, Connecticut, the Jewish Federation of Greater Santa Barbara, California, Temple Sinai in New Orleans, and the national and local chapters of National Council of Jewish Women.

“Every aspect of our lives and the character of our democracy is impacted by judicial vacancies, none more so than the current vacancy on the Supreme Court,” Nancy Kaufman, CEO of the National Council of Jewish Women, said in a statement. “For those of us who increasingly depend on the court to protect our religious freedom and our rights as women, the ongoing vacancy is disastrous.”

Interfaith coalition urges Senate action on Supreme Court vacancy Read More »

What was Ruth Bader Ginsburg thinking in criticizing Donald Trump?

What was RBG thinking?

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg launched a broadside against Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump over the the last week, calling him unfit for office. She subsequently said she regretted her comments, but not before voices on the right and left criticized her for seeming to compromise the high court’s dignity and objectivity.

“Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg needs to drop the political punditry and the name-calling,” The New York Times editorial board said. The Washington Post agreed.

Even her most ardent fans were at a loss to defend her descriptions of Trump as a “faker,” criticizing his failure to hand over his tax returns and saying his presidency would be too dire to contemplate.

“I adore Justice Ginsburg,” Robert Wexler, the former Florida congressman whose autobiography is titled “Fire-Breathing Liberal,” told JTA in an email. However, he added, “It’s fair to say Mr. Trump doesn’t bring out the best in people.”

Truth is, there isn’t much wiggle room for a defense: The American Bar Association’s ethical guidelines say flat out that a judge “shall not … publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for any public office.”

Not that the ABA guidelines have much practical consequence in this case: Supreme Court justices are inviolate – once they’re in, they’re pretty much in until they want to leave, or they die. Ginsburg, 83, however much this taints her legacy, will remain a fixture of the court.

“Judicial ethics prohibit candidates from commenting on public office,” said David Bernstein, a legal scholar who opines for the Washington Post. “Even though the Supreme Court justice are not bound by the code,” Ginsburg’s outburst “does not reflect the consensus. It was wildly inappropriate.”

So: What was she thinking?

Here are some theories:

She’s losing it.

Trump was characteristically blunt. “Her mind is shot – resign!” he said on Twitter.

Barney Frank, a longtime member of Congress and a liberal who extols Ginsburg’s legacy in advancing rights for women, said it was painful to admit, but Trump may have a point: It might be time for Ginsburg, 83, to go.

“I’m afraid it’s a sign she stayed too long and she’s not functioning,” Frank said in an interview. “I can’t imagine she would have made this mistake 15 years ago. It diminishes her legacy.”

Frank, who retired in 2013, said he was chided by friends for leaving office at the peak of his influence. Just three years earlier, the Massachusetts congressman and Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., had rewritten the rules for how Wall Street works with their Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

“I retired a couple of months short of my 73rd birthday,” he said. “I said I wanted people to ask why I quit, not why I didn’t quit.”

Ginsburg, he said, should have quit several years ago, when the Obama administration would have guaranteed a liberal replacement.

Sometimes you’ve got to break the rules.

The prospect of a Trump presidency is so dire, ethical considerations seem to lose some of their urgency in this case, said Mark David Stern, who covers the law and LGBT issues for Slate.

“Donald Trump is not an ordinary presidential candidate, or an ordinary Republican,” Stern wrote. “He is a racist, misogynistic, xenophobic bigot. He has proposed banning Muslims from entering the United States; called Mexican immigrants rapists and criminals; supported the deportation of 11 million undocumented immigrants; routinely treated women with sexist disdain; advocated for torture of suspected terrorists; and generally dismissed the rule of law.”

Ginsburg, he said, was right to “sacrifice some of her prestige in order to send as clear a warning signal about Trump as she possibly can.”

Everyone does it.

Noah Feldman, a Harvard law professor, wrote on Bloomberg News that the rules Ginsburg was ostensibly violating were mostly honored in their breach.

He listed open clashes between Supreme Court justices and presidents dating to John Marshall, who as secretary of state campaigned for John Adams in his unsuccessful bid for reelection in 1800. Thomas Jefferson won the election, but before he took office, Adams named his friend chief justice while keeping him as secretary of state. Marshall stopped being secretary of state once Jefferson was inaugurated, but remained a notable thorn in Jefferson’s side as a justice.

Besides, wrote Feldman, “Doesn’t everyone have an outspoken Jewish grandmother?”

In Politico, Linda Hirshman, who has written a book about Ginsburg and Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, came up with two Jewish precedents for judicial politicking.

Abe Fortas, a justice in the 1960s, routinely consulted with President Lyndon Johnson on matters personal and political, and didn’t bother to deny it to seething congressional Republicans who denied him the chief justice spot in congressional hearings.

Louis Brandeis, Hirshman wrote, the first Jewish Supreme Court justice, paid Felix Frankfurter to advance his favored progressive causes after Brandeis joined the court in 1918. Frankfurter – for whom, coincidentally, Feldman’s professorial seat is named – became the third Jewish Supreme Court justice in 1939.

This keeping shtum can be aggravating, especially for born loudmouths.

Ronald Halber, the director of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Washington, D.C., said he was simultaneously appalled by Ginsburg’s jeremiad but also sympathetic. He was reminded that Jewish community professionals, writ much smaller, face the same dilemma as judges. They are naturally opinionated folks who take on roles that keep them from pronouncing their opinions.

“Nonprofit directors who I work with engaged in public affairs work and engaged in communications work would love to state political opinions – and people who run JCRCs are truly political,” Halber said.

“But we keep them to ourselves. I never once publicly announced who I would support for a candidate, and Justice Ginsburg has a much more important role. If you’re going to keep community, or project impartiality, you can’t project your opinion.”

Donald (and the Republicans) started it.

Dahlia Lithwick, who writes about the courts for Slate, said Trump has joined Republicans in a jihad against the courts — a lot to bear for those in the legal profession.

She listed the Republican-led Senate’s refusal to consider President Barack Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, and the attack by Trump on the Mexican heritage of a federal judge as two examples.

“By speaking up for a judicial branch that has absorbed one body blow after another in recent months, in stoic squint-eyed black-robed fashion, she did nothing but level the playing field,” Lithwick wrote of Ginsburg. “If the court is really going to be fair game in the nihilist rush to break government, she is signaling that the court may just need to pick up arms and fight back.”

Bernstein, whose Washington Post columns reflect conservative and libertarian views, had some sympathy for exasperation with Trump, but said Ginsburg had nonetheless crossed a red line.

“Almost everyone I know who is a member of the same class she is, is very troubled by Trump, including conservative and libertarians,” he said. “While everyone knows politics is not absent from the Supreme Court, they at least try to make the effort.”

Ginsburg, in her statement of regret, appeared to come around to that view.

“Judges should avoid commenting on a candidate for public office,” she said in a statement. “In the future, I will be more circumspect.”

What was Ruth Bader Ginsburg thinking in criticizing Donald Trump? Read More »

UCLA censures campus leader who tried to keep student group out of BDS fight

UCLA has reprimanded the former president of its Graduate Student Association for threatening to withhold funding for an event were it to promote divestment from Israel.

Jewish organizations this week criticized the investigation by the university’s Discrimination Prevention Office that concluded last month. The probe was spurred by complaints from Students for Justice in Palestine and the campus Diversity Caucus that law student Milan Chatterjee had violated students’ freedom of speech by putting stipulations on association funding.

Chatterjee, who is Hindu, threatened to rescind funding for a student town hall last November if pro-Palestinian groups used the occasion to promote divestment from Israel. He said his intention was to maintain the Graduate Student Association’s neutrality in political affairs.

The Discrimination Prevention Office found that Chatterjee acted “outside the authority of the presidency and cabinet to create policy and make funding decisions, among other findings,” the Daily Bruin reported.

UCLA policy requires that funding to student events be made without regard to the viewpoint of any registered organization.

Jewish groups accused the Discrimination Prevention Office of “targeting” Chatterjee.

The American Jewish Committee in Los Angeles said it was “deeply concerned” by the university’s ruling.

“The fact that a student official would be sanctioned for seeking to avoid embroiling the UCLA GSA in the fraught politics of the Middle East tells you all you need to know about the political agenda of his detractors and the cowardice of those that enable them,” the AJC wrote in a statement this week.

The Israeli-American Nexus, a Southern California organization affiliated with the the Israeli-American Council, said it was outraged by UCLA’s treatment of Chatterjee, charging that the university acted out of bias.

“It is very troubling when a public university sanctions a fair and balanced student leader for simply seeking to keep the UCLA GSA from being entangled in the complex issues of Middle East politics,” the IAX said in a news release. “When the policy was enacted by Milan in November 2015, the GSA Cabinet had voted unanimously in favor of it.”

Chatterjee is not expected to face any other consequences from the university.

UCLA censures campus leader who tried to keep student group out of BDS fight Read More »

Trump taps advisors to head ‘Israel Advisory Committee’

Ahead of the much anticipated vice presidential announcement, Donald Trump on Thursday announced the formation of an “Israel Advisory Committee,” which will analyze U.S. policy on Israel and offer recommendations on alternative solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Trump’s two Israel-related advisors, Jason Greenblatt and David Friedman, will serve as co-chairs of the committee, according to a news release.

Dr. Richard Roberts, a prominent Republican donor from Lakewood, NJ has been appointed as vice chair. ”It is a great privilege to be asked to join this committee which, among other things, intends to analyze the status quo, seeking input from all parties on potential new solutions to seemingly intractable problems, and to recommend solutions to Mr. Trump,” Roberts said on Thursday.

Back in March, Roberts “>outed as advisors in April.

This week, the Republican Party’s platform committee “>floated the idea of remaining “neutral” on Israel, Trump said Israel should not be pressed to halt new construction in West Bank settlements in order to bring the Palestinians to the negotiating table. “No, I don’t think there should be a pause,” Trump told “>also said seeing Israel and the Palestinians sign on a peace deal would be a “beauty” in spite of the situation on the ground.

In an interview with the Jewish Week published this week, Greenblatt said the two states for two people solution shouldn’t be taken as a given. “My view is that we should look at a single-state solution — and any other options on the table,” he told the NY-based Jewish publication.

In an 


” target=”_blank”>Subscribe here.


Trump taps advisors to head ‘Israel Advisory Committee’ Read More »

Open Heart

Last week, having heard that Elie Wiesel passed away, I picked one of his books off my office bookshelf.  What better way to honor Wiesel's memory than to read his words.  Of course, I've read Night and others of Wiesel's writings, but this book was different.  Open Heart is a memoir of Wiesel's experience of emergency heart surgery when he was eighty two.

Because of my father's work on the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, Wiesel was a family friend.  I remember vividly how during his speech at the opening of the museum in 1993, Wiesel turned to then President, Bill Clinton and called him to action about the former Yugoslavia saying, “we must do something to stop the bloodshed in that country!”  Wiesel embodied the Jewish conscience – that “Never Again” means not merely Never Again to us – but never again to anyone.

In reading Open Heart, I feel that I got to know Wiesel personally in a way that I hadn't before – as he lets us into his operating room and into his heart.  There, I came across a passage that stopped me in my tracks.  It was Wiesel's mission statement – the purpose by which he lived his life.  I read and reread the piece, savoring each phrase, unpacking it as one would a Talmudic text.

I was struck by the juxtaposition of events – that Wiesel's death was immediately followed by the shootings of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile, as well as of the five police officers in Dallas – Brent Thompson, Patrick Zamarripa, Michael Krol, Sergeant Michael Smith, and Sr. Cpl. Lorne Ahrens.  In this turbulent time in our country and our world, Wiesel's words seem to be the exact message that we need to hear right now. Wiesel wrote:

      A credo that defines my path:

      I belong to a generation that has often felt abandoned by God and betrayed by mankind. And yet, I believe that we must not give up on either.

      Was it yesterday-or long ago- that we learned how human beings have been able to attain perfection in cruelty.  That for the killers, the torturers, it is normal, thus human to act inhumanely?  Should one therefore turn away from humanity?

     The answer of course, is up to each of us.  We must choose between the violence of adults and the smiles of children, between the ugliness of hate and the will to oppose it.  Between inflicting suffering and humiliation on our fellow man and offering him the solidarity and hope he deserves.  Or not.


     I know-I speak from experience-that even in darkness it is possible to create light and encourage compassion.  That it is possible to feel free inside a prison.  That even in exile, friendship exists and can become an anchor.  That one instant before dying, man is still immoral.


There it is: I still believe in man in spite of man.  I believe in language even though it has been wounded, deformed, and perverted by the enemies of mankind.  And I continue to cling to words because it is up to us to transform them into instruments of comprehension rather than contempt.  It is up to us to choose whether we wish to use them to curse or to heal, to wound or to console.

     As a Jew, I believe in the coming of the Messiah.  But of course this does not mean that the world will become Jewish; just that it will become more welcoming, more human.  I belong, after all, to a generation that has learned that whatever the question, indifference and resignation are not the answer.

     Illness may diminish me, but it will not destroy me.  The body is not eternal, but the idea of the soul is.  The brain will be buried, but memory will survive it.

     Such is the miracle: A tale about despair becomes a tale against despair.
          
     In this excruciating time in our country and our world, may our story about despair become a story against despair.

Open Heart Read More »

Trump reportedly set to name Mike Pence, pro-Israel stalwart, as VP choice

Donald Trump reportedly is set to name as his running mate Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, whose congressional career was marked by his leadership on pro-Israel issues.

The New York Times first reported the pick on Thursday, quoting anonymous campaign officials, cautioning however that the selection was not yet a certainty and that presumptive Republican nominee, who prides himself on being unpredictable, could once again change his mind before his 11 AM Friday eastern time announcement.

Pence, a conservative Christian, emerged quickly as a leader on pro-Israel issues during his decade in Congress from 2001-2011, where he rose rapidly to the GOP caucus leadership, chairing the GOP’s caucus in his final term, 2009-2011. He led a number of bids to place conditions on funding for the Palestinian Authority, and in 2007, he joined then Rep. Ron Klein, D-Fla., in convening the Congressional Anti-Semitism Task Force.

He has continued his pro-Israel advocacy as Indiana governor, earlier this year signing one of the most robust state laws targeting the movement to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel.

Jewish Republicans have over the years embraced him with enthusiasm, although his conservatism on social issues has raised concerns. In 2015, at the springtime Republican Jewish Coalition retreat in Las Vegas, RJC director pressed him on an Indiana law that would allow businesses to decline the custom of LGBT people. The law was revised and moderated after Pence faced threats of boycotts of the state.

Trump reportedly set to name Mike Pence, pro-Israel stalwart, as VP choice Read More »