fbpx

September 12, 2015

A Foodie Rosh Hashanah: Appetizers for Personal Growth

Dipping an apple in honey is the most popular in a series of simanim, symbolic foods, associated with the Rosh Hashanah feast. The custom is even recorded as far back as the Talmud. There are many other simanim, some simple and some exotic, that vary by community including: fish, pomegranate, fenugreek, black-eyed peas, carrots, dates, pumpkin, leeks, beets, fish heads or gefilte fish, and even chicken livers.

Some simanim correspond to curses and call for destruction of the enemies of the Jewish people. Some imply that their consumption will improve the general position of the Jewish people amongst the nations. Some are indications for having many children, and some that our merits be recalled and that evil decrees be undone.

So, if these simanim are so powerful then perhaps one could think that we don’t need to plead our case to God. Maybe we could just hold massive date and fish-head eating rallies and instantly safeguard the Jewish people and decimate our enemies? [I wouldn’t have that rally just yet.]

The late 13th century Catalan scholar, Rabbi Menachem Meiri, asked whether the simanim are a prohibited form of sorcery. This was several centuries before the Shulchan Aruch, which has chapter on simanim. The Meiri answered that simanim could be construed as sorcery, but they are really there to prod us into action:

“And so that we do not stumble into the forbidden territory of nichush, sorcery, the rabbis instituted that [along with eating them] one should recite statements that inspire teshuvah. So we say on the gourd that our merits should be ‘recalled before you,’ and on the fenugreek that ‘our merits increase,’ and on the leek ‘our enemies be cut off’ – it is referring to sins, the enemies of our soul – and on beets, ‘our sins be removed,’ and on the date, ‘our iniquities be vanquished etc.’” (Beit Habechirah, Horayot 12a).

So we can understand from the Meiri’s explanation that dipping the challah and apple in honey to symbolize our desire for a sweet and good year cannot on its own bring Hashem’s Mercy. Even though mercy is alluded to in the honey — דבש, honey, has the same gematria as אב הרחמים, Father of Mercy — it cannot be received without teshuvah, resolutions, and sincere prayers to Hashem. We use honey to remind us.

Just eating a sweet Medjool date isn’t going to have an effect on our physical enemies, nor on our internal spiritual enemies. Rather, the date reminds us that we can, and must, fight a battle with the yetzer hara (evil inclination).

Somewhere along the road we might have lost a deeper understanding of this teshuvah technology. We started to think that the simanim themselves have the power to bring forth change in the world. No matter how much honey we eat, it won’t bring transformational change. However they can inspire change. As one of my students remarked, “It will remind me to look at the sweet things in life and not focus on the bitter.”

But rather than ignore the complex practice of the simanim because we don't understand how to use it, or are afraid that it borders on sorcery, let's enhance it.

There is also a wonderful mindfulness element that is part of the ritual, as we offer a kavanah an intention before eating each food. Most of the intentions are connected to a play on words between the Hebrew name of the food item and the desired outcome. (Read them A Foodie Rosh Hashanah: Appetizers for Personal Growth Read More »

Misdirected Outrage

After forty years in the civil rights field, most of it focusing on combatting anti-Semitism in its various guises, this observer has learned to not take anyone with a simple take on how to deal with bigotry and hate too seriously. There is no panacea for vices that date back millennia— if not actually rooted in basic human instincts to distinguish an “in group” from “others” (for thoughtful guidance read Dr. Suess's The Sneetches). I also have little patience for political correctness that invokes sanctimonious outrage where none is appropriate–when the “offense” is simply calling like it is, politically incorrect though it may be. Honesty and accuracy are not sins.

First, the political correctness. This week The New York Times ran an article entitled “>declared that the article, “was a gross insult to the intelligence of the people who voted for and will vote against” [the deal]. Cooper said, it evokes images of “Jewish pressure” and “Jewish money” influencing the Iran vote.

Cooper's ire may have been aroused by the initial version of the story (with the offensive link to religious affiliation) but his words were broader in condemning even a suggestion that the millions spent by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee [AIPAC] on full page ads or the vocal opposition of Federation and Jewish community leaders across the country might have impacted the vote of representatives and senators with large Jewish constituencies. 

That's a bizarre position, after all, isn't that how democracy works with representatives responsive to the concerns  of their lobbying constituents? It's nothing to be ashamed of. If lots of Sen. Schumer's donors and supporters and usual allies let him know they opposed the deal it should hardly be surprising that he would choose to buck his president and vote how his vocal, active and generous supporters want; he undoubtedly needs votes and money to get re-elected. It's not a “gross insult” to anyone to point out the obvious.

Equally obvious, it would be close to journalistic malpractice were The New York Times not to explore what the likely reason is that so many predictably loyal supporters of the president's policies in his own party would choose to break with him on a key issue. Rabbi Cooper and others may not like the facts discussed, but if it's accurate and related to the issue at hand, it's not bigotry to discuss it. The truth will out…. and so it should be.

Similar hyper-sensitivity was evidenced this week in the ramp up to the University of California's  Board of Regents' debate next week on their ““>demanding that the Regents incorporate in their statement the United States State Department's Misdirected Outrage Read More »