fbpx

July 21, 2015

Believe the hype: New Public Enemy album named for Yiddish proverb

Public Enemy, the Grammy-nominated hip-hop group, released their 13th studio album on Thursday. The title of the album, “Man Plans, God Laughs,” is a translation of a well-known Yiddish proverb.

It’s unclear whether or not the band, formed in Long Island, New York, in 1982, knowingly used a Yiddish phrase. Efforts to reach the band were unsuccessful.

Public Enemy’s hit songs include “Don’t Believe the Hype,” “Bring the Noise” and “Fight the Power,” the theme to Spike Lee’s film “Do the Right Thing.” The band has been extremely influential, with their dense musical production techniques, lyrical content and strong political stance.

Accusations of anti-Semitism have surfaced several times in the band’s history. In a controversial 1989 interview with The Washington Times, band member Richard Griffin, aka Professor Griff, claimed that Jews were “responsible for the majority of wickedness that goes on across the globe.”  Following the controversy, the band’s leader, Chuck Ridenhour, “Chuck D”, made a public apology and temporarily disbanded Public Enemy, though they regrouped less than a month later.

Public Enemy’s 1990 song “Welcome to the Terrordome” caused a stir with lyrics reviving the ancient accusation that Jews were responsible for the crucifixion of Jesus.

“Man Plans, God Laughs” was released on the music streaming service Spotify and for download from RCSMusic.

 
 
 

Believe the hype: New Public Enemy album named for Yiddish proverb Read More »

Theodore Bikel, ‘Fiddler on the Roof’ star, dies at 91

Actor Theodore Bikel, who originated the stage role of Captain von Trapp in “The Sound of Music” but was best known for starring as Tevye, the poor Jewish milkman, in the Broadway hit musical “Fiddler on the Roof,” died on Tuesday at age 91.

A native of Vienna, Austria, who grew up in British-controlled Palestine and became a U.S. citizen in 1961, Bikel died of natural causes at a Los Angeles hospital, his publicist, Harlan Boll, said in a statement.

[Theodore Bikel: A man in full]

Bikel began his celebrated run as Tevye in 1967 after Zero Mostel had originated the role. He went on to perform the part of the struggling Jewish dairyman, and such memorable songs as “Tradition” and “If I Were a Rich Man,” in excess of 2,000 times, more than any other Broadway actor.

The musical, set in the fictional Jewish shtetl, or settlement, of Anatevka in 1905 czarist Russia, is based on a series of stories by Yiddish author Sholem Aleichem, collectively titled “Tevye and his Daughters.”

It chronicles the joys and hardships of Jewish life described in the opening scenes by its protagonist as being as shaky as a fiddler on the roof. The 1971 motion picture adaptation starred Chaim Topol as Tevye.

By the time he launched his stint in “Fiddler,” Bikel had already woven himself into the fabric of the great American musical playing Captain Georg Von Trapp, opposite Mary Martin, in the original Broadway production of “The Sound of Music.”

The role, which paralleled his own family's escape from Austria following the German annexation of their homeland in the 1930s, earned Bikel his second Tony nomination in 1960. Two years earlier he had been nominated for his work in “The Rope Dancers.”

He was also the first to perform “Edelweiss,” which was written specifically for Bikel, an accomplished folk musician, during final off-Broadway tryouts of the “Sound of Music” when it was realized his character was lacking a song of his own.

In the film version of the musical, Christopher Plummer assumed the role of the captain, with Julie Andrews starring as Maria.

Bikel's own big-screen career spanned more than 150 appearances, including his 1951 movie debut as a German naval officer in the classic “The African Queen” and an Oscar-nominated turn as a Southern sheriff opposite Tony Curtis and Sidney Poitier in “The Defiant Ones.”

He also played Zoltan Karpathy, the Hungarian linguist, in the movie version of “My Fair Lady,” a submarine captain in “The Russians Are Coming the Russians Are Coming” and the king of Serbia in the 1952 film production of “Moulin Rouge.”

Bikel appeared in numerous television shows during three decades – ranging form “Alfred Hitchcock Presents” to “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” in which he played the adoptive father of Klingon Lieutenant Commander Worf. In one memorable guest role on the CBS sitcom “All in the Family,” he played a German butcher infatuated with Edith Bunker.

As a recording artist, he produced several albums of Jewish folk songs.

Theodore Bikel, ‘Fiddler on the Roof’ star, dies at 91 Read More »

Biden defends Iran deal in call with Jewish leaders

Vice President Joseph Biden defended the Iran nuclear deal in a call with the organized Jewish community that drew a thousand listeners.

Biden, considered the closest Obama administration official to the Jewish community, said Monday that he has fielded much skepticism among Jews since the major powers and Iran reached a sanctions relief-for nuclear restrictions deal last week.

“What’s the deal here, Joe?” has been a repeated question, Biden said.

Biden noted his long history of closeness to Israel and the Jewish community.

“Please do not doubt my commitment to Israel,” he said.

Congress has two months to consider whether it should disapprove of the deal, which would kill it. Opponents and backers of the deal have launched major campaigns for Jewish public opinion, cognizant of its influence on how lawmakers may vote in a case that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has cast as an existential one for Israel.

Biden launched into a detailed, hourlong rebuttal to some of the objections he’s encountered, saying, for instance, that the mechanism that would snap back sanctions should Iran violate the agreement would be immediate for the first 10 years and would not require months of work.

He also downplayed concerns about delays of up to 24 days in inspectors’ access to suspect sites, noting that the detectable half-life following nuclear activity lasts for centuries.

“The idea that they can evade verification is not possible,” the vice president said.

The White House endeavored to get as many community lay leaders and professionals to call in, urging Jewish organizations to spread word of the call.

Because of the length of Biden’s talk, he did not take questions. Colin Kahl, Biden’s national security adviser, who is in Israel accompanying Defense Secretary Ash Carter, did field some questions after Biden left the call.

Biden defends Iran deal in call with Jewish leaders Read More »

Israeli lawmakers approve tougher law against rock throwers

Israeli lawmakers voted to impose longer jail terms on people caught throwing rocks at civilian cars and roads.

The Knesset passed the bill on its second and third readings on Monday night by a vote of 69 to 17.

Under the new law, rock throwers can be sentenced to up to 20 years in jail if it is proven that they intended to cause injury, and 10 years if harmful intent is not proven. Also, a prison sentence of five years can be levied for throwing a rock at a police officer or police car.

“Today justice has been done,” said Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked of the Jewish Home party after the vote. “For years terrorists have been evading punishment and responsibility. The tolerance shown to terrorists ends today. A stone thrower is a terrorist, and only a proper punishment can be a deterrent.”

The law does not cover the West Bank, which is under Israeli military law, and where Palestinians frequently throw rocks at Israeli civilian cars.

The Arab Joint List party in a statement called the new law a form of “collective punishment” and said it was meant to “oppress the Palestinians’ civilian and popular struggle.”

At least three Israelis, including a baby, have been killed in the West Bank after rocks were thrown at the cars they were riding in, and others have been seriously injured.

Earlier this month, a Palestinian teen was shot in the back and killed after throwing a rock at an army vehicle. Col. Yisrael Shomer said he felt threatened by the teen in the July 3 incident near the West Bank city of Ramallah, but a surveillance camera showed that the teen was shot as he ran away. The vehicle’s windshield was shattered in the attack.

Israeli lawmakers approve tougher law against rock throwers Read More »

Yenta Gammy

From earliest childhood, one of my closest relationships was with “Gammy,” my maternal grandmother, Edith, a traditional Russian bubbe.“ Gammy” was my closest approximation to “Grandma”. 

According to Jewish tradition, a baby is named with the first letter of a loved deceased relative’s name.  The E in Emily is for Edith and her Hebrew name is Edya. 

Gammy always told me how much she loved the sparkle in my eyes. She liked it best when my hair was in a ponytail because she said it set off my eyes, green like her own.   When the elevator opened on the third floor of her building at Bundy and Montana, across from the elementary school and around the corner from the farmers market on Sundays, my sister and I would race to the sterling silver bowl of Andes Mints and voraciously unwrap them as if we were denied the pleasure at home. Since my mom was an overweight child, Gammy steered us in the opposite direction, limiting the Andes to one each.  I wondered why she had the bowl out in the first place.  I understood after her death that to her and her culture, appearances are everything, that she needed to present a certain façade to the world, that as long as there were mints in the bowl, everything was alright. 

She was a complainer.  She would call my mom and report that she was feeling “lousy” – a word Emily has adopted – she would moan and groan in a voice that suggested someone had died.  We called it a “Gam Slam” for the recipient on the other end.   Once again, part of the Russian culture to brood. 

When she didn’t want me or my sister to know what she was saying, she talked to my mom across the room in Russian, even cursing in Russian from the tone, literally right over my head. My mom grew up speaking Russian and English at home.  She can speak and understand but not read or write, maybe a reluctance to learn the secrets of the culture. 

When she was on her death bed, she would not allow my mom to contact her old friends. 

Gammy said:  I can’t have them see me like this. 

She had the hospice hair dresser style her once a week bedside. 

One octogenarian came anyway with flowers from the Cedars gift shop and sat next to me on the hospital bed.  My grandmother was so short and slumped over with a hump on her back that she didn’t even take up half the bed. 

Her friend said to me: Why didn’t Edith call me?

Again, the candy bowl. 

Gammy also had several important pieces of ivory and jade – an elephant made of individual parts and an old fisherman with a caught fish on a delicate string.  Her only other valuables were a portrait, photographed and painted over of me and my sister over her fake fireplace and a snapshot of her late canine companion Lucky, a miniature poodle who left her many years before.

Gammy was widowed when my mom was 18.  She became a “Yenta”, a matchmaker,  though never for herself. She began to fail rapidly during my last year of graduate school but still kept her hand in on finding a Jewish doctor for me. 

When it involved her beloved Robyn, she was as determined as a Russian pulling a horse cart.   She had no idea about the challenges I faced – despite her own bouts with emotional darkness, since my bipolar predisposition came from the other side of my family, my parents and I kept it a secret from her. Too much worry for her to contain.  I always thought she could see it in my eyes. 

One morning, as she pondered her weekly Jewish Journal over lox and eggs, she read about an Internet dating service for Jewish young professionals and among her last requests to me was that I subscribe to JDate.com.

Though we were still in the beginning stages of our relationship, I could see that Gammy was near the end of her life and so, when I introduced her to Josh, I lied and said we were engaged so she could go quietly, secure in the knowledge that her darling Robyn was going to marry a Jewish doctor.

Yenta Gammy Read More »

This is Me (or is it?) — The Facebook Paradox

My sole Facebook friend (acceptance required, as she is my stepdaughter) has lately been  “pinning” her life on Pinterest. It seems she's discovered yet another way to collect and display her “likes” and interests … in place of actively engaging in her life. I could be sounding overly harsh, but her other online passion is to comment daily on her heavy TV-viewing habit.

My stepdaughter is not alone in maintaining a pretend persona through Facebook and other social media applications. Still, it was disconcerting, to say the least, when I caught her in the act — after a weekend visit from up North to our home in Fort Lauderdale.

She made no particular plans for this visit, claiming she simply wished to spend time with her dad. So we took her along on our usual activities. This included reviewing a retro bar's grand opening (complete with antique car show out front), an open-mic music night at the local cafe, a stroll along the art galleries of tony Las Olas Blvd., lunch at our favorite Indian buffet, and an open invitation to use our car keys at any time to visit the beach, some 15 minutes away.

She decided to get sunburned in our front yard instead. And other than enjoying a couple of home-cooked meals and sneaking outside for cigarette breaks, she appeared truly bored by all of our endeavors. As in … repeatedly checking the time and asking when we planned to leave, bored. As in … constantly engaging her iPhone no matter what we were doing and where we went, bored. And when we finally returned home, she seemed relieved to plop down on the couch and watch cable TV for the rest of the night.

So you can imagine my surprise upon logging into Facebook a few days after her visit (to look up a client for a short write-up) to be met with a stream of my sole Facebook friend's “Having a great time in Fort Lauderdale” photos. There is my stepdaughter, huge smile on her face, at the “cool” live music cafe. Next photo has her enjoying a cocktail at the “funky” new bar. She's even posed in front of her “favorite” art gallery on Las Olas — one, I might add, she hadn't even bothered to enter.

Numerous envious-sounding friends responded with how much they would have enjoyed these outings, or had visited similar venues in the past. Would they really? Had they actually done so? Or are they, too, part of the growing cadre of pseudo-life Internet poseurs who find greater satisfaction in Instagramming their food than in eating it, in showing off their wonderful lives than in the actual experience.

The Matrix may be only a movie, but for today's younger generation — addicted as they are to video games and as-seen-through-the-web social engagements — it may have already become their default way of life.

© 2015 Mindy Leaf

Follow Mindy's essays of biting social commentary at: “>https://askmamaglass.wordpress.com

This is Me (or is it?) — The Facebook Paradox Read More »

The number of Conservative\Reform Jews in Israel goes up (again)

It's a common belief that Conservative and Reform Judaism are not really dominant in the Israeli Jewish sphere, a common belief that has some truth to it. For many years the dominant religious stream in Israel was Orthodoxy, while other streams – born in Diaspora communities and possibly more compatible with Diaspora circumstances – seemed alien to many Israelis. That, and the inherent advantage of Orthodoxy based on its official monopoly on several key components of Israeli life (Marriage, Kashrut, representation in official ceremonies), made the “other streams” seem marginal. To most Israelis these remained the streams of diaspora communities (and perhaps a few Anglo communities in Israel).

Thus, people were somewhat surprised when three years ago I first published findings according to which eight percent of Israelis define themselves as “Reform” or “conservative”. Not a huge group, but also not a very small one. Can you believe it – my headline from three years ago said – Israel has more Conservative and Reform than Haredis.

That was then. Today we can talk about even larger numbers. According to a survey conducted by Menachem Lazar about a week ago, 12% of Israelis define themselves as “Reform” or “Conservative”. 6% for each denomination. Of course, that is still a much lower number than the 35% of Israelis who define themselves as “Orthodox”, and even lower than the 45% of Israelis who answer with “no denomination”. But it is something. More than Haredis, for sure. More than it was a couple of years ago.

When I called Lazar to talk about his findings he said he was not surprised. That is, because two years ago he conducted a poll in which the percentage of Conservative and Reform Jews was similar. Only back then he was not certain about the meaning of the number because the question was somewhat problematic. Instead of asking about “Conservative”, the question was about “Masorti-Conservative” – a term that could be misleading for “traditional” (Masorti) Israelis. The recent survey confirms that Israelis were not misled. The numbers are very similar. More than one in ten Jewish Israelis chose to answer with a “Conservative” or a “Reform” to the question about religious denomination.

Lazar sent me additional data with which to try and understand why so many Israelis – relatively speaking – are suddenly becoming Reform and Conservative, and what this change means.

In his previous poll, he asked respondents to say if their self-definition as Orthodox, Reform, and Conservative means something that they deem “personal” or “communal” – namely, if their definition is a manifestation of participating in a community of like-minded Jews.

For Orthodox Israelis – not all but many – it is. More than 64% of Israeli “Orthodox” Jews said that the definition refers to both a communal sense of belonging and a personal one, and 9% more said that is refers only to the communal sphere. But for Reform and Conservative Israeli Jews the opposite is true. Their self-definition is mostly “personal” – not “communal”. 73% of Reform Jews and 65% of Conservative Jews said “personal”. So what we have here is a growing group of Israelis that are choosing to identify themselves with something, not to participate in something.

Of Reform Israeli Jews, 91% said that they never or rarely participate in religious ceremonies “in the synagogue of the stream with which they identify”. 70% of Conservative Israeli Jews never or rarely participate in religious ceremonies “in the synagogue of the stream with which they identify”. So the common joke about secular Israelis – the shul they never go to is an Orthodox shul – should now be updated. For a growing segment of secular Israel, the shul-rarely-visited is now a Reform or a Conservative shul.

So today, the Israeli “Chiloni” (secular) Jew does not instinctively identify himself or herself with Orthodoxy. According to Lazar's data from last week, only 6% of secular Israelis define themselves as Orthodox. 7% define themselves as Conservative, and 10% say Reform (71% refuse to be identified with any of the streams).

Israel's “traditional” sector – a segment that most people assume is a non-Askenazi, relaxed form of Orthodoxy – is also not exactly what we think. 26% of “masorti” (traditional) Israelis identify as Orthodox, but 17% identify as Conservative (10%) or Reform (7%).

Of the groups of self-defined “religious” and “ultra-religious” Israelis (Haredi and Dati) the percentage of Conservative and Reform is zero. Namely, in Israel being Reform or Conservative is almost proof of no active religiosity in the traditional sense. Take this finding, combine it with the one from a year ago about the personal-communal sphere and the picture becomes clearer: Conservative and Reform Israelis are people who do want to identify themselves with a religious stream, but have a very low tendency to join Conservative and Reform communities or lead actively religious lives.

What does this tell us about the state of these streams? First of all it means that the denigrated Israeli Orthodox rule is not necessarily bad for them. The annoyance than many Israelis feel because of Orthodox hardheadedness motivates some of them to identify with streams other than the Orthodox stream, even though they do not lead an actively religious life.

It also means that these streams have not yet found a way to turn identification into action. People might like the idea of non-Orthodox Judaism, but they do little except for telling a pollster that they like it. Politically speaking, that is, of course, a recipe for more Orthodox rule – because in politics, while numbers are important, the intensity of support for an idea or a movement is even more important.

Take a look at one example, also from Lazar's recent poll: the Israeli government, a few days ago, canceled the conversion reform that was established by the previous government. Do Israelis support the cancelation? Not really. 60% of them still say that they support the conversion reform, and only 25% of them say they oppose it. But the 25% triumphed over the sixty percent – because for them it is a higher priority.  Or take a look at a similar example: not long ago another poll of Jewish Israelis revealed that a whopping “fifty-nine percent of respondents agreed that rabbis representing the Reform and Conservative movements should be treated the same as their Orthodox counterparts”. So this is another case of minority triumph over the majority – because the minority makes this issue a priority.

Will this ever change? That's up to the majority of Israelis to decide. But even if the change is slow, and even if the issue of priorities forces one to take the information in the new numbers with a grain of salt, one should not miss the fact that something is not quite as it used to be. Surely, with more than a tenth of the Jewish Israeli population calling themselves Conservative and Reform, these terms will gradually lose their once alien-sounding meaning.

The number of Conservative\Reform Jews in Israel goes up (again) Read More »

New Accessible Sneakers for People with Disabilities

Looking for a good restaurant close by? Take a look on Yelp and see what others have to say. Want to catch the latest movie? Hit the Flixster app on your smart phone and see what both critics and the general public have to say. With consumer-focused apps for almost every possible service, product or need, the marketplace is quickly becoming more responsible to consumer opinions and needs, and this is good news for people with disabilities.

The most recent example comes from Nike, which has just introduced some very cool accessible new sneakers that were requested by teenager Matthew Walzer from Florida who has cerebral palsy. In 2012, he posted an open letter to Nike, which said, in part:

“At 16 years old, I am able to completely dress myself, but my parents still have to tie my shoes. As a teenager who is striving to become totally self-sufficient, I find this extremely frustrating, and at times, embarrassing,” Walzer wrote. “My dream is to go to the college of my choice without having to worry about someone coming to tie my shoes everyday.”

As reported in Disability Scoop, Walzer’s request was spread far and wide on Twitter, under the hashtag #NikeLetter, and then the shoe blog, Nice Kicks took notice, and posted a video that attracted more than 10,000 views. All of this social media buzz paid off, and Nike agreed to take on this project. They worked with Walzer for over three years testing prototypes and the end result is that Nike is now rolling out an “easy-entry footwear system.”

Rather than rely on laces, the new approach uses a wrap-around zipper system to secure the shoe. What’s more, a larger opening at the back makes it easier to slide the foot in and out. Limited quantities of this new shoe, called the LeBron Soldier 8 FLYEASE will soon be available on Nike.com.

The high price tag on the shoes may prevent many people with physical disabilities from actually purchasing them, but if they sell well, I am sure there will be other, cheaper, knock-off versions. I hope that other companies in other sectors will learn from Nike’s example and start listening more to their customers with disabilities and “just do it.”

New Accessible Sneakers for People with Disabilities Read More »

An interview with ‘Sharknado’ writer Thunder Levin

Will lightning strike thrice?

Who better to ask than Thunder? That would be Thunder Levin, the writer of the campy, over-the-top “Sharknado” movies — the latest of which, “Sharknado 3: Oh Hell No!,” premieres on July 22.

For those unfamiliar with the “Sharknado”oeuvre, the films center on a strange weather phenomenon: A hurricane that precipitates a tornado. Together they suck up live, hungry sharks that subsequently rain down on humanity. In a kind of Darwinian miracle, during those few airborne minutes the sharks evolve sufficiently so that being out of water does not impact their appetite.

“Oh Hell No!” features returning stars Ian Ziering (“Beverly Hills, 90210”) as Fin and Tara Reid (“American Pie,” numerous embarrassing YouTube videos) as April, a shark-fighting couple. Together they conquered the beasts in Los Angeles (2013) and New York (2014). Yes, April lost her left hand to one chomper, but when you’re fighting airborne killer sharks with your bare hands, well, stuff happens.

For the moment, when “Sharknado 3” opens, all is well. April is with her mom, played by Bo Derek (who is still at least a “9”) and daughter, played by Ryan Newman (the young actress from Disney’s “Zeke and Luther,” not the Nascar driver of the same name) in Orlando. April is also with child.

The appropriately named Fin is in the nation’s capital receiving the Presidential Medal of Freedom for past heroics, when… You’ll never guess: There’s a hurricane, a tornado and sharks. Go figure.

The White House, the Washington Monument, the Smithsonian are all destroyed. But Fin manages to save the president (played by Mark Cuban) and heads south to be with family.  But — wait for it — more sharknados threaten the entire Eastern Seaboard, especially Orlando.

Levin spoke to JTA by phone from Los Angeles, where he was at the tail end of a promotional tour that included Comic Con. At one session, he casually mentioned he always considered the films ripe grist for a Broadway musical — which caused a stir on social media.

That sort of blew up,” Levin said. “We’d all been joking about that since the first one. The only thing more absurd than ‘Sharknado’ is ‘Sharknado the Musical.’ But I started in musical theater in high school and was a director and stage manager in college. I think it would be a blast. I can imagine shark puppets dropping in the audience.”

“Sharknado” wasn’t Levin’s first venture into horror humor. He made his bones in 2008 as both writer and director of the feature film, “Mutant Vampire Zombies From the Hood.” He’s also directed and/or wrote “American Warships” (about an alien attack on an American plane) and “AE: Apocalypse Earth” (refugees from earth on a hostile alien planet) — so it wasn’t a great leap to sharks falling from the sky.

People constantly ask, “‘How do you come up with these crazy ideas for these movies?’” he said. “There’s no good answer to the question. I don’t know. There’s no secret, ancient book of sharks.”

Actually, the original idea for the Sharknado series originated with Asylum — the production company with which he’d worked his previous movies — which wanted to do a feature called “Shark Storm.” They approached Syfy, and it turned out the network already had “Sharknado” as a title.

“Asylum came to me and asked if I’d be interested in working on a film called ‘Sharknado,’” Levin recalls. “Only I heard ‘SharkNATO’ — and asked what do sharks have to do with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization?”

“When they explained, I said, ‘Tornadoes? That’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard — I’m in,’” he recalls.

Not everyone was as enthusiastic. “For the first ‘Sharknado,’ we couldn’t get anyone to be in it,” he said. “We ended up temporarily changing the title to ‘Dark Skies.’ When we finally told the cast the real name, they were not happy.”

Yet the film became a surprising hit, eventually. When it debuted, it was seen by slightly fewer people than Syfy’s typical film audience. But it wasn’t how many people watched that proved important — it was whowatched. The  Twittersphere lit up as celebs like Wil Wheaton and Olivia Wilde discussed the show, and it was the subject of the last tweet Corey Monteith sent before he died. As a result, the audience for subsequent showings exploded, and “Sharknado” spawned “Sharknado Two: The Second One” and now, “Oh Hell No.”

Although Levin is not involved in casting, he’s aware that it’s no longer a problem. In fact, part of the fun of watching the “Sharknado” movies is picking out the names of the rich and famous or rich and notorious: Michele Bachmann, Ann Coulter, Frankie Muniz, Jackie Collins and Penn & Teller, among a host of others.

In addition to star Ziering, included in the pantheon are a couple of notorious Jews, Anthony Weiner and Jerry Springer. Bernie Madoff was otherwise engaged.

Levin grew up in New York City the son of a Christian mom from Liverpool, England and a Jewish father. “My father went to temple and I went along with him a couple of times,” he said. “But it’s really hard for me to talk about religion, because I didn’t have faith instilled in me by my parents.”

But Levin believes his sense of irony and humor are descended from his father’s side. It’s “informed by New York City and its large percentage of Jews,” he said. “You know, growing up I thought the U.S. was 50 percent Jewish and 50 percent Christian. I was shocked when I found out that wasn’t so.”

If his sense of humor was courtesy his dad, Levin’s fascination with science fiction came from his mom. “When I was a little kid, ‘Star Trek’ was my favorite show and the only one my mother would let me stay up to watch,” he said.

“I wanted to grow up to be Captain Kirk or Mr. Spock,” he said. Levin recalls that when he was 7 or 8, someone gave him a book, “The Making of Star Trek.” Though he found the text dry, he was drawn to the photographs — particularly one of studio techs working on the Enterprise.

“I realized there was a way to get on there without being Kirk,” he said. “Another seed was planted in 1977 when ‘Star Wars’ came out and completely blew my mind.”

Levin further enhanced his geek cred by standing in line with 100 buddies for six weeks (they rotated) to be the first to see “Star Wars Episode 1: The Phantom Menace” in 1999.

That explains a lot. Which leaves only one question: Thunder — really?

“It was the ‘60s and strange things were happening,” Levin said. “My mother went into labor during a thunderstorm and said to my dad, ‘Let’s name him Thunder.’”

Good thing he wasn’t born during a sharknado.

“Sharknado 3: Oh Hell No!” debuts on the Syfy network Wednesday, July 22, at 9 p.m.

An interview with ‘Sharknado’ writer Thunder Levin Read More »