fbpx

March 16, 2015

Closing in on nuclear deal, U.S. demands ‘tough choices’ from Iran

The United States and Iran inched closer to a political deal that would set the stage for a landmark nuclear agreement, but a U.S. official warned on Monday that Iran must make tough choices to allay fears about its atomic ambitions.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif held nearly five hours of talks in the Swiss city of Lausanne before the Iranian delegation headed to Brussels for meetings with European ministers.

After the Lausanne talks, a senior U.S. official said it was not clear if an end-March deadline for a framework agreement between Iran and six major powers could be met.

“We are trying to get there but quite frankly we still do not know if we will be able to,” the official told reporters on condition of anonymity. “Iran still has to make some very tough and necessary choices to address the significant concerns that remain about its nuclear programme.”

The official did not elaborate but added that the Iranian delegation also raised in the meeting with Kerry an “ill-timed and ill-advised” letter from 47 Republican senators to Iran's leadership warning that they could undo any deal President Barack Obama made with them.

“These kinds of distractions are not helpful when we're talking about something so serious,” the official added.

The U.S. official said the sides would work through the end of the month if needed to secure a deal. Talks are expected to resume on Tuesday.

Speaking to reporters in Brussels, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said progress had been made in the talks but “important points” were unresolved. A statement from German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said a deal could not be struck “at any price”.

STICKING POINTS

With the Iranian new year holiday of Norouz approaching this weekend, officials close to the talks say it will be difficult to complete a political agreement this week. If it is not possible by the weekend, the talks could reconvene in the final days of March.

Zarif said all sides needed to keep talking this week to see what could be achieved.

“On some issues we are closer to a solution and based on this we can say solutions are within reach. At the same time, we are apart on some issues,” he told the Iranian news agency IRNA.

Six world powers — the United States, Germany, France, Britain, Russia and China — are trying to reach a political framework agreement with Iran by the end of the month that would curb Tehran's most sensitive nuclear activities for at least 10 years in exchange for the gradual easing of some sanctions.

The parties have set a June 30 deadline to finalise all the technical details of an accord. Western officials say privately that overcoming disagreements on some of the remaining sticking points would be very difficult.

Iran's Oil Minister Bijan Zanganeh, echoing Tehran's official view, said “unjust” Western sanctions should be lifted, the official IRNA news agency reported on Monday.

“We are ready to increase the oil export by up to 1 million bpd when the sanctions (are) lifted,” Zanganeh said, adding that the boost “will not have an impact on the crude prices.”

U.S. and EU sanctions that came into force in 2012 prohibit the import, purchase and transport of Iranian petroleum products, crippling the major oil exporter's economy.

The meeting between Kerry and Zarif included U.S. Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz and Iran's nuclear chief Ali Akbar Salehi.

“I'm very optimistic,” Salehi told reporters afterwards.

But a senior Iranian official doubted whether a deal would be reached this week as there were gaps on some important issues, although the atmosphere at the talks was good.

European Union Foreign Policy Chief Federica Mogherini told reporters the talks in Brussels had been helpful. “We discussed all the remaining open gaps and the way forward,” she said.

A European diplomatic source, however, said substantial gaps remained and it was not clear they could be resolved in the coming days. “The talks were lengthy and in-depth, but they did not enable us to narrow our differences,” the source said after Zarif met his French, German and British counterparts.

Kerry has urged Iran to make concessions that would allow the sides to reach a political framework agreement for a nuclear deal that would lift sanctions in exchange for tight restrictions on Tehran's nuclear programme and increased monitoring of its atomic sites.

The West suspects Tehran of wanting to create an atomic weapons capability. Tehran denies that and says its research is for purely peaceful purposes.

In Brussels, British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond also said a framework agreement was still some way off.

“There are areas where we've made progress, areas where we have yet to make any progress,” he told reporters.

PROGRESS AND OBSTACLES

After their meeting in Brussels, the Iranian delegation will return to Lausanne for more talks with the Americans, and will be joined later in the week by senior European officials and possibly foreign ministers, depending on how the talks develop.

In Tehran, former nuclear negotiator and current parliament speaker Ali Larijani said failure to get an agreement would not be a tragedy.

The sides have twice extended the talks on a long-term accord that the United States says must have a duration of at least 10 years. They signed an interim deal in November 2013 that gave Iran limited sanctions relief in exchange for some limitations on sensitive nuclear work.

After months of deadlock, there have been areas of progress in the talks recently, Iranian, U.S. and European officials say. The number of enrichment centrifuges Iran wants to operate over the long term, one of the biggest sticking points in the talks from the beginning, is likely resolvable if Tehran can keep around 6,500 of the machines that purify uranium, they say.

There are also discussions about the size of Iran's uranium stockpiles and how much would be relocated to Russia or another country, Western officials say. Originally, Iran wanted to enrich 2.5 tonnes of uranium per year, but could settle at half a tonne, a senior Iranian official said. The remainder would be turned into fuel rods or sent to Russia, he added.

Recently the United States and France agreed to consider the possibility of a swift suspension of U.N. nuclear sanctions at the outset of any deal, in addition to freezing some of the most painful U.S. and European energy and financial sanctions.

The subject of lifting U.N. sanctions has turned into a sensitive one in the United States, where Republicans in Congress opposed to engaging Iran accuse Obama of seeking to bring an agreed deal to the U.N. Security Council first in an attempt to bypass U.S. legislators.

Difficult issues include Iran's insistence on pursuing advanced centrifuge research, Tehran's need to answer questions on past nuclear activities that could be arms-related, and the speed of lifting sanctions. Iran wants all sanctions lifted immediately but Western powers want them eased gradually.

Closing in on nuclear deal, U.S. demands ‘tough choices’ from Iran Read More »

Interfaith peace ring brings over 1,000 to Copenhagen synagogue

More than 1,000 people formed a peace ring around a Copenhagen synagogue that came under deadly attack last month.

Muslim, Jewish and Christian participants held hands and called for peace during the display of solidarity at the central Copenhagen shul, or Krystalgade Synagogue, on Saturday afternoon, according to reports.

On Feb. 14, a volunteer Jewish security guard, Dan Uzan, was shot and killed there by a lone Islamist gunman. Hours earlier, the same gunman killed one in a shooting at a free speech event at a cultural center in the Danish capital. The gunman was killed in a shootout with police.

Among the participants in the peace ring was Uzan’s father, as well as Denmark’s chief rabbi, Jair Melchior, and government ministers Morten Ostergaard and Sofie Carsten-Nielsen.

The ring was the initiative of Niddal El-Jabri, a Copenhagen Muslim who told the news website thelocal.dk that he wanted Jews to feel safe and welcome in the city.

Police had cited security concerns for rejecting the original request for such a rally, which was made a week after the shootings.

The Copenhagen organizers duplicated a similar initiative that took place last month in Oslo, where reports said that more than 1,000 people, including many Muslims, formed a human chain around a synagogue in a show of support for Jews.

A separate Danish Muslim group held a peace vigil in Copenhagen’s City Hall Square on Feb. 27 that was attended by an estimated 300 people, thelocal.dk reported.

Interfaith peace ring brings over 1,000 to Copenhagen synagogue Read More »

Netanyahu: No Palestinian state on my watch

Benjamin Netanyahu said in an interview that as long as he is Israel’s prime minister, a Palestinian state will not be established.

The interview was published Monday on the Israeli news website NRG, a day before Israelis head to the polls, as Netanyahu attempts to shore up right-wing support.

“I think anyone who is going to establish a Palestinian state and to evacuate territory is giving radical Islam a staging ground against the State of Israel,” Netanyahu told NRG. “This is the reality that has been created here in recent years. Anyone who ignores it has his head in the sand.”

When the interviewer asked again in the article, presented in a Q&A format, “If you are a prime minister, there will be no Palestinian state?” Netanyahu responded, “Indeed.”

Netanyahu accused the left of burying its head in the sand “again and again.” He said a strong government led by Likud must be formed to withstand the pressures of the international community to divide Jerusalem and return to the pre-1967 borders.

Also Monday, Netanyahu visited the Jewish eastern Jerusalem neighborhood of Har Homa, considered an illegal settlement by the international community. As prime minister in 1997, Netanyahu approved the first construction in Har Homa.

“It was a way of stopping Bethlehem from moving toward Jerusalem,” Netanyahu said of the construction, The New York Times reported. “This neighborhood, exactly because it stops the continuation of the Palestinians, I saw the potential was really great.

“We will preserve Jerusalem’s unity in all its parts. We will continue to build and fortify Jerusalem so that its division won’t be possible and it will stay united forever.”

Xavier Abu Eid, a spokesman for the Palestine Liberation Organization, was quoted in the Times as saying that Netanyahu “has confirmed verbally for the first time what we have denounced for years — that Har Homa is not about an innocent ‘Jerusalem neighborhood’ on occupied land, but about splitting occupied East Jerusalem from Bethlehem.”

Netanyahu: No Palestinian state on my watch Read More »

Suspect in Ferguson, Missouri shooting of police appears in court

The man accused of wounding two policemen during a protest rally outside the Ferguson, Missouri, police headquarters last week appeared in court on Monday briefly and did not enter a plea.

The shooting was the latest in violent incidents that have punctuated months of demonstrations in Ferguson, a St. Louis suburb, since a white police officer shot dead unarmed black teen Michael Brown during a confrontation in August.

Jeffrey L. Williams, 20, has admitted to firing the shots that wounded the officers early Thursday and also told authorities he was not shooting at police, Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch said on Sunday after announcing the arrest.

Williams did not give any statements on Monday during his brief appearance before Judge Joseph Dueker in St. Louis County Circuit Court. He is charged with first-degree assault and his bond is set at $300,000.

Police had called the shooting an “ambush” of the officers, who were standing side by side, by a gunman embedded with protesters, but McCulloch said on Sunday Williams may have been shooting at someone else.

Several long-time activists have said they did not recognize or know Williams as a protester. “He never protested before,” Bishop Derrick Robinson, an activist, told CNN on Monday.

The shooting of the officers, who were treated at a local hospital and released, followed a flurry of resignations and protests in the week since the U.S. Justice Department released a damning report accusing Ferguson of racially biased policing.

The Justice Department, which launched an investigation after Brown's shooting, found pervasive racial bias in Ferguson's policing and municipal court practices. Its police force is mostly white and two-thirds of residents are black.

Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson, its city manager and its municipal court judge have resigned.

Williams, who had been on probation for possession of stolen property, is accused of firing shots early Thursday from a car just as a rally after Jackson's resignation was breaking up.

The Justice Department said Ferguson police overwhelmingly arrested and issued traffic citations to black residents to boost revenue through fees and fines, helping to create a culture of distrust that exploded with Brown's shooting.

Demonstrations erupted into arson and looting after Brown's shooting in August and again in November when a grand jury declined to bring charges against Officer Darren Wilson.

Suspect in Ferguson, Missouri shooting of police appears in court Read More »

The five stones of truth

“Then he took his staff in his hand, chose five smooth stones from the stream, put them in the pouch of his shepherd’s bag and, with his sling in his hand, approached the Philistine.”   1 Samuel 17:40.

Two armies faced each other more than two millennium ago. The Israelites were retreating from the advancing Philistines. The two armies took their last stand on opposing hilltops in readiness for the final decisive battle. The odds favored the Philistines. Dividing them was the Valley of Elah in Judea. Today, some call it part of the West Bank. This is important because, in this tale, you will hear the echoes of history resound in today’s world.

Conditions favored the Philistines. The Israelites were led by a weak king. Strategically, the tailwind seemed to be with the Philistines who taunted the retreating Jewish people who were fearful and unwilling to head into another losing battle that they knew was facing them. Their land, their kingdom, was in jeopardy of being lost forever.

Each day the Philistines sent their most potent weapon down into the valley to insult and challenge the legitimacy of the Israelites. A giant named Goliath was their representative, their perceived strength. Nobody on the Israelite side was prepared to face the challenge until a boy stepped forward. David, a young shepherd boy from Bethlehem, had walked the fifteen miles to join the Jewish army facing the advancing Philistine enemy. He saw that nobody was willing to take up the challenge of defying them, so he walked down into the valley armed with nothing more than a slingshot.

The enemy burst out laughing when they saw this single figure of a lad step forward to take on their impressive figurehead. The boy waded into a nearby stream and took out five smooth stones. He armed his slingshot, whirled it round his head, and hurled the first stone at the enemy’s hero. It struck the middle of the giant’s forehead. Goliath fell to the ground, dead.

The Philistines were stunned into silence and shock. The Jewish army, amazed at the simple act of initiative from this young courageous boy, advanced confidently on the enemy and routed them from the battlefield. They saw that the perceived invincibility of the Philistines was built on nothing more than a clumsy giant without substance.

The story has great relevance today. The powerful narrative of today’s Philistines, the Palestinians, is built without substance. It can be brought down with a handful of smooth stones – the stones of truth, legitimacy, courage, heritage, and values. All it takes is one person with conviction and the knowledge to courageously go out armed with the weapons of the five stones and face the fraudulent giant, knowing that he represents nothing but lies and deception.

Learn the factual legitimacy of Israel. Research the events of San Remo and the League of Nations Resolution of 1922. Read what actually happened to the United Nations Resolution 181 that failed to make it into the statute books, to realize that the Palestinian narrative has no basis in fact or law. Discover that the five stones are held firmly with the hands of Israel, as firmly as they were held in the hand of David so many years ago.

With these simple weapons, the five stones of rights, justice, truth, facts and history, it is possible for Israel to gain the high moral ground and leave the enemy in disarray. 

Barry Shaw is the author of ‘Israel Reclaiming the Narrative.’ www.israelnarrative.com

His new book ‘Fighting Hamas, BDS and Anti-Semitism’ has just been released. https://www.createspace.com/5333306

The five stones of truth Read More »

Israel: Democracy in action

The messy and chaotic atmosphere that has permeated the election season in Israel has made it easy to overlook one simple fact – Israel’s neighbors are jealous of this very mess.

“We really envy the Israelis,” a veteran Palestinian journalist told Khaled Abu Toameh of the Jerusalem Post. “Our leaders don't want elections. They want to remain in office forever.”

One of the quirks of an open society is that the ugly, messy stuff is always visible, and in an election season, there’s plenty of it to feed the media beast. We’ve seen it all this year, from racist attacks to outright lies to libelous accusations.

This is the price Israel pays for having an open society – its warts are always on display.

Spend enough time focusing on these warts and you’ll think the country is going to hell in a hand basket. Go on the Website of the New Israel Fund (NIF), an organization working for a “better Israel,” and you’ll read about “the inequality, injustice and extremism that diminish Israel.”

The irony is that on that same site, there’s evidence not of a diminished Israel, but of an enlightened Israel, a country that empowers its people to fight for justice and make the country a better place.

In a section on “victories,” the NIF details some of its recent accomplishments, from a landmark legal victory for religious pluralism to a new overnight medical center in a peripheral town to doubling the number of Arab women in municipal councils.

Other victories include a ruling in a Haifa court to penalize discrimination against Arabs; a decision by the government to stop the exclusion and segregation of women in the public sphere; a decision by an Israeli court that minors detained under the Anti-Infiltration Law should be released from jail; and a ruling that Orthodox authorities don’t have a monopoly on determining how Jews pray at the Western Wall.

A “diminished” country would not allow such rulings – they can only come from a society that appreciates the values of human dignity, equality and basic decency.

In such a society, what gives people hope is the noisy “corrective mechanism” that is always churning to correct injustice and make things better. It is this vibrant human and legal mechanism that defines the character of the country — not the instances of racism, xenophobia or inequality that one can find in any open society.

As a Jew born in an Arab country, I can only marvel at the ascendance of the Arab parties in Israel’s latest elections. It’s good to know that Arabs have significantly more rights in a Jewish country than Jews have ever had in an Arab country.

Yes, there’s still plenty of injustice left, and Israel still has a long way to go to correct its faults. That’s true of any country that aims high and refuses to settle for just being “better than our neighbors.” But because of its corrective mechanism, Israel always offers hope for a better future.

The tragedy is in societies where people have no hope, because they have neither the tools nor the freedom to fight for their rights. 

When that Palestinian journalist expressed his envy of Israel’s elections, he was yearning for Israel’s corrective mechanism, for a way to hold his own leaders accountable.

What’s interesting is that Israel established its democratic ways long before the birth of the state in 1948, at a time when Jews were still under British occupation. The first municipal elections for the Jews of Palestine took place in 1920, when over a dozen parties ran for 314 seats. In fact, all of the basic institutions of Israel’s democracy – legal, economic, social and educational – got their start decades before the state was born. 

The most basic of these democratic institutions is surely freedom of speech, which allows anyone to speak up and challenge authority. This freedom to open one’s big mouth has always been a defining trait of Israeli society.

As a result of this abundance of free speech, Israel’s image has often taken a beating, as the incessant infighting among Israelis makes the country look like one big mess.

Well, it is. But one of the ways Jews of the Diaspora can help Israel is to remind the world that this big mess is, in fact, democracy in action.

We will see this democracy in action as a new governing coalition is formed in Israel in the coming days and weeks. This coalition, whether leaning left or right, will upset plenty of Israelis. But the law will ensure that the transition will happen smoothly. And if you ask me, that’s not messy, that’s pretty neat.


David Suissa is president of TRIBE Media Corp./Jewish Journal and can be reached at davids@jewishjournal.com.

Israel: Democracy in action Read More »

Netanyahu vows to stop ‘Palestinian continuity’ toward Jerusalem

This story originally appeared at The Media Line.

Har Homa, Jerusalem – Standing on an apartment balcony beneath an olive tree overlooking the green hills between Jerusalem and Bethlehem, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu told a hastily convened news conference in this neighborhood that it prevents “territorial contiguity” for a Palestinian state. The corner apartment was draped with banners saying “Only Netanyahu Can” and “It’s Either Them or Us,” two of the Likud’s latest slogans.

“There was a Palestinian attempt to connect Bethlehem and to burst into the city from the south,” Netanyahu wearing a dark suit and a blue tie, and squinting into the sun, told a group of reporters, along with a few neighborhood residents. “The pressure on me not to build here was intense, but I insisted and it was worth it,” Netanyahu said. “Today there are tens of thousands of residents here. I and my friends in Likud will preserve Jerusalem and continue to build it.”

Har Homa, which Palestinians call Jebel Abu Ghneim, is built on land that Israel annexed to Jerusalem after 1967. To build the neighborhood, which today has 22,000 residents, according to mayor Nir Barkat, who introduced the Prime Minister, Israel annexed private land from both Israelis and Palestinians. The neighborhood was inaugurated in 1997, in one of Netanyahu’s first acts as Prime Minister, and sparked international condemnation, as well as Palestinian riots.

With polls showing Netanyahu’s Likud party trailing the center-left Zionist Camp by between three and five seats, Netanyahu is going all-out to attack the challengers, focusing his ire on his former Justice Minister Tzippi Livni. He also consistently referred to challenger Isaac Herzog as “Bougie”, a nickname Herzog has sought to rid himself of.

“The choice is the Likud headed by me, or a left-wing government that will give in to every demand,” Netanyahu warned. “If Tzippi (Livni) and Bougie (Herzog) are here, on these hills will rise Hamastan,” he said, using a phrase that usually refers to the Gaza Strip that has been controlled by the Islamist Hamas since 2007.

Netanyahu also called it a “fateful” election and warned that every vote counts.

“Come to the polls and bring your friends and your relatives,” he told Yaron and Sigal Chakshorian, who told The Media Line they were asked to host the news conference only early this morning.

“I’m a Likudnik,” Yaron Chakshorian told The Media Line. “I like his charisma and his presence.”

Their neighbors, Rely and Yossi Asaraf, stood holding their seven-month-old daughter, Efrat. Like the Chakshorians, they have moved here because apartments are substantially cheaper here than closer to the center of the city. Their three sons attend local schools and they say they love the neighborhood.

“We’re here because of him,” Yossi told The Media Line, explaining his support for Netanyahu.

“People talk about the need for jobs and housing, but the most important thing is security,” Rely told The Media Line. “We are surrounded by enemies and Bibi can handle them better than anyone else,” she said using the Prime Minister’s nickname.

Outside the Chakshorian’s home, however, there was not as much support for the Prime Minister. Most of the banners hanging from windows supported Yachad, a new party well to the right of Likud.

At a nearby grocery store, owner Asaf Tapiro said that just one day before the election, he had still not decided who to vote for.

“I voted Netanyahu last time but I’m still not sure this time,” he told The Media Line. “I might vote for Moshe Kahlon, because I think he is the best for the economy and that’s the most important issue for me.”

Kahlon, a former Likud government minister, is popular for opening up the mobile phone market to competition, saving Israelis hundreds of dollars a year on mobile phone bills. Polls say his new party, Kulanu, could win ten or eleven seats and be an important coalition partner to either Netanyahu or Herzog.

In an effort to respond to these voters, Netanyahu was joined at the news conference by supermarket mogul Rami Levy, whose chain of discount supermarkets are popular with Israelis. Yet Netanyahu focused his message, as he has for the past three months, on his security credentials.

“Tzippi and Bougie will not be able to preserve your security,” Netanyahu warned. “If they win, you will have rockets fired on you from these hills.”

Netanyahu vows to stop ‘Palestinian continuity’ toward Jerusalem Read More »

Livni says she’ll forgo being prime minister should Zionist Union win

Israeli politician Tzipi Livni said she will forgo the opportunity to take the prime minister position in two years should her Zionist Union slate prevail in the elections.

Livni made the announcement on Monday night, less than a day before Israelis vote for a new national government.

In December, when her Hatnuah party merged with the Labor Party to form the center-left Zionist Union, it was with the understanding that its two leaders would share the premiership in rotating shifts should the combined slate win in the elections. Labor’s Isaac Herzog was to take the first two-year shift.

Livni reportedly made the announcement in order to ease the way for Herzog to form a government coalition, as well as to strengthen support for the Zionist Union in the last hours before Israelis go to the polls.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who heads the center-right Likud Party, responded by accusing the Zionist Union of “panicking.” Naftali Bennett of the right-wing Jewish Home party speculated that Livni’s decision signaled that Zionist Union would form a unity government with Likud, a theory Herzog denied.

Livni says she’ll forgo being prime minister should Zionist Union win Read More »

Yesh Atid candidate Ruth Calderon, secular Talmudist, stands up to the Rabbinate

Yair Lapid, head of the two-year-old Israeli political party “>secular Talmudist, was the natural pick.

“Shabbat shalom,” Calderon, 53, told the crowd, a mix of Hebrew- and English-speakers, before launching into one of her now-famous political Talmud lessons. “It's a little bit awkward to do it standing up in a bar… but I want to tell you a story that is amazingly relevant four days before the election,” she said. Reading from a hefty red Talmud that once belonged to Lapid's grandfather, Calderon told the story of an ancient Jewish president who was ousted after shaming his subjects one too many times — a clear metaphor for current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “Who's going to replace him? We'll know in four days,” she said with a grin.