fbpx

March 13, 2015

Israeli start-up hoping USB drives will bridge digital divide

In Peter Jairus’ Nairobi neighborhood, almost nobody has a personal computer.

Mathare is one of the Kenyan capital’s largest slums. Buildings are constructed from sheets of corrugated metal and Internet access is rare, found only in places like schools or community centers. Even then, the connection can be spotty.

So when Jairus heard about Keepod, a cheap device that places a computer’s operating system on a small USB drive, he jumped at the idea. Last April he met with Keepod’s creators, and six months later 60 of the devices were delivered to Mathare.

Jairus, a musician and youth activist, now runs a cybercafe where 30 to 40 people come daily to go online with their Keepods.

“The Keepod is very personal to everyone,” Jairus told JTA. “People use it for studying, someone else is using it for YouTube, Facebook, social media. This one is using it for research.

“It helps the community very, very much because a lot of people cannot afford the laptop, and 99 percent of the community could not have computer access.”

Based in Tel Aviv, the Keepod company aims to provide the world’s poorest countries with widespread computer and Internet access. By putting a modern computer operating system on affordable USB drives, users are able to connect to the Internet using older — and much less expensive — computers.

Founders Nissan Bahar and Franky Imbesi say their innovation will help bridge the so-called digital divide — the gap between those with and without regular computer access.

“People can access information to empower themselves,” Bahar said. “That means education, health care, personal growth, being able to read and see what’s going on around the world through a free medium.”

Attempts to bring Internet access to the world’s poorest people are hardly new. Nearly a decade ago, the United Nations backed an effort to create a $100 laptop through One Laptop Per Child, a project that aimed to bring inexpensive computers to developing nations.

But Bahar believes such efforts are impractical on a large scale because even $100 can be hard to afford for citizens of developing countries. Keepods cost just $7 a pop, and by allowing users to store their personal information on the drive, people can use their individual Keepods to share a single computer, further depressing the cost of Internet access. Keepod has arranged to collect some of the tens of millions of computers discarded each year and ship them to schools and community centers in the developing world at a cost of under $100 each.

“[It’s] something very cheap that people won’t even try to steal, that if you lose it, you replace it,” Bahar said. “We don’t believe in making a cheap computer; $140 will never be cheap enough.”

When they began Keepod in 2011, Bahar and Imbesi aimed to create a USB drive that kept all of a user’s data on a small external drive rather than on a computer’s internal hard drive. By keeping sensitive information off the computer, the product gave users an added layer of security.

In late 2013, Bahar and Imbesi realized their device could be a boon for those in the developing world who shared computers. Keepods can run a modern Android operating system even on older computers. And because every program will be run from the USB drive, viruses won’t infect whole computers.

“After a couple of years, my partner and myself started seriously questioning what we were doing in life,” Bahar said. “How we could make a positive impact on the world around us instead of just making products?”

Keepod has already sold more than 30,000 USB drives. This year, Bahar hopes to vastly increase that number. About half of the company’s sales have been made through partnerships with NGOs; the rest are purchased directly from Keepod’s website. The device is also available through retailers.

College Socka Bongue, a 500-student high school in Cameroon, bought USB drives for its students last year along with 26 used computers. Philippe Socke, the executive director of a foundation that funds programs at the school, said the drives have allowed them to conduct research on the Internet for the first time.

After so many years of limited digital access, the transition has been a challenge. Socke said only about 5 percent of the students have computers at home.

“The administration was still relying on pads of paper and chalkboards,” Socke said. “Not having computer experience negatively affected the education. Our collaboration with Keepod literally allowed us to put computer access in the hands of every student.”

Still, Keepod has encountered some challenges in putting their product into the hands of those who would most benefit from it. Two of the five funded projects listed on Keepod’s website have fallen through because the company’s NGO partners could not afford it or faced infrastructure challenges.

At one of the two, the WhyNot Academy in Mathare, 26 students had Keepods last year. Now only seven have them. Students either lost them or transferred to other schools, taking the devices with them. The school also lost Internet access for several months, making the Keepods far less useful.

Mike Dawson, CEO of Ustad Mobile, which installs educational programs on smartphones for children in the developing world, said that spotty electricity, plus the challenge of maintaining old computers, present obstacles to the wide deployment of Keepod technology.

“The problems come from electricity costs, come from maintenance costs, come from access to skilled people,” he said. “These are all costs, and they don’t add up to $7 per person.”

Unreliable infrastructure may continue to hinder Keepod, but Bahar hopes that selling the drives through retailers — in addition to providing them through NGOs — will give increasing numbers of people access to the digital world, at least when the Internet is on.

“We want to enable anyone to buy a Keepod and use it, if not part of an NGO or organization,” he said. “We want to be sustainable.”

Israeli start-up hoping USB drives will bridge digital divide Read More »

Q&A: Nikbakht explains how Iranian regime is exporting anti-Jewish ideology to U.S.

Frank Nikbakht is perhaps one of the world's foremost experts on the Iranian regime's advancement of anti-Semitic content in the media. With the U.S. State Department recently granting a visa to the notorious anti-Jewish Iranian comedian, Akbar Abdi, I sat down with Nikbakht recently to get a better idea of the Iranian regime's recent exportation of anti-Jewish ideologies to the United States. The following is a portion of that interview…

 

How common is it for popular or mainstream actors, filmmakers, artists in Iran to be openly anti-Jewish? And do they have these views in order to win support from the regime and keep their careers going?

 

There is no doubt that the openly anti-Semitic policies of the Iranian regime have been designed to attract the most suitable individuals in all fields to offer their talents. The Iranian Intelligence Ministry as well as the “Ershad” or the Ministry of Indoctrination have been approaching many screen writers, actors and others to produce anti-Semitic products. The ongoing case of annual Holocaust Cartoon exhibits on the international Holocaust Remembrance Day is just an example.  I have met people in Iranian show business who had been offered huge amounts to play in specific anti-Semitic films, but had refused due to the extreme nature of the films and the government related propaganda aspect.

 

From the online videos that you have seen from Abdi and your knowledge of his roles in certain films, please discuss the extent to his anti-Jewish views. Why was his choice of the word “Joohod” especially vile?

 

In the video where he is receiving a prize from President Ahmadinejad, Abdi is obviously sucking up to him, for his “courageous” UN speech, saying, ” you did it in the Johood's own house”. He could have meant the UN, but most probably he was speaking of New York, where all international Islamist terrorists consider the center of the Jews in America.

 

Is it common for public figures in Iran to use the word “Joohod” to reference Jews? Or do they try to use the more polite terms such has “Kalimi” or “Yahudi” to refer to Jews?

 

In fact, public figures have very rarely used this word, if at all, because like everyone else in their age group, they know the difference. Muslims in general, use the word “Kalimi”, meaning the followers of the one who spoke to God  Moses.  Most Muslims call Jews “kalimi” in their face, but they use the word “Johood” behind their backs. The letter of the law  also uses the respectful “Kalimi” even as it explains the lower status of the Jews as third class citizens; however, the tightly controlled press and media has frequently interviewed people who use this word in order to “popularize” it among the people.

 

Please share with us the extend and true degree of anti-Jewish content or propaganda from the regime that is typically prevalent in Iranian films or television programs? Is it common or is it more hidden in the form of anti-Israel comments?

There have been enough anti-Jewish references to dilute the difference; however there have been encouraging signs that sectors among the Iranian people have been rejecting this. For example during several massive demonstrations in 2009 – like on Quds day, nonetheless –  in  people were chanting , “neither Lebanon, nor Gaza ! Our lives are dedicated only to Iran”. Up until today, officials denounce these slogans, indicating they are still feeling the sting.

 

In your personal opinion why do you believe the State Department has granted a visa to Abdi considering his well-known anti-Jewish views? What is their objective or are they not knowledgeable about his background of hate?

Their priority for the last few years has been appeasing the Iranian regime in all possible forms. It is doubtful if they have time to worry about insignificant problems like anti-Semitism in Iran, but we must give them the benefit of the doubt.

Abdi and his apologists may argue that he was unaware that the term Joohod was offensive. Can you please comment of this and if this is a viable argument?

No middle aged Iranian can claim ignorance. While much younger people raised under the one sided and constant Iranian regime’s propaganda should be educated about such terms, the older generation using these derogatory terms must only apologize and refrain.

Q&A: Nikbakht explains how Iranian regime is exporting anti-Jewish ideology to U.S. Read More »

A Reality Check

Much has been written over the past few days about the terrible incident at UCLA in which an active Jewish student was pummeled with questions by a student board about her prospective appointment to the board because, and only because, of her religion. Almost simultaneously there was an outrage at the University of Oklahoma where fraternity members engaged in a vulgarly racist chant that was recorded and uploaded to the internet.

Both were egregious examples of bigotry and vulgar stereotyping, seemingly from a bygone era.

The UCLA incident elicited prompt responses from the university administration— Chancellor Gene Block condemned the “intolerance” and urged the campus community to “create a campus community in which all of us can fully take part in campus life and express our views and identities, safe from intimidation, threat or harm.”

The offending inquisitors apologized, “we ask the Jewish community to accept our apology for remarks made during the February 10 USAC meeting concerning the potential Judicial Board appointee….we are truly sorry for any words we used….we look forward to engaging in cross-cultural exchange with the Jewish community and learning about what we can do better to support the community, with solidarity and respect.”

Within two days the Daily Bruin editorialized and condemned the “discriminatory” and “hypocritical” proceedings by a board that is “seemingly obsessed with celebrating diversity in student positions and advocating against discrimination.” This week the president of the University, Janet Napolitano, and the chair of the Regents made clear that incidents where “bigotry [is] directed against any members of the UC community because of their faith, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation will not be tolerated.” 

At Oklahoma, president of university, David Boren, promptly suspended the offending fraternity, expelled the students who participated in the racist singing and expressed his abhorrence at what occurred in no uncertain terms.

In the case of UCLA, there has been a groundswell of on-line petitions, op/eds and commentaries castigating the administration for not being assertive enough. One blogger decried Block and asserted “there is something foul afoot.” An on-line open letter to Chancellor Block I received decried the “escalating anti-Semitism at our alma mater…an inevitable consequence of the pervasive and relentless anti-Israel campaigns being promoted at the university.”

In the Oklahoma case, Boren is being criticized for acting too hastily and forcefully. The New York Civil Rights Coalition and UCLA Law School professor Eugene Volokh asserted that students can’t be expelled for the mere expression of views, however reprehensible. The incident is also being cited as evidence (by Charles Blow of The New York Times) of a wider rot in society, that “racism envelops us like a fog.”

What links these two cases are not just the bigotry, but, more importantly, the swift responses to the offensive actions by the student leadership, the administration, the media, and the public. They are also similar in demonstrating the ease with which critics described the events through their own prism and facilely criticized folks (especially administrators at public universities) who are in a very difficult position. Public university heads need to balance personal rights, constitutional constraints and what are, often, obvious bad acts. 

What most commentators are missing though is, in my view, the key part of these stories—the near universal recognition of and swift condemnation of the bigotry accompanied by rapid apologies from the offending parties.

It wasn’t all that long ago—-23 years to be exact—that I was involved in a nasty incident of anti-Semitism at UCLA in which the Black student newspaper, underwritten by UCLA and with a teacher/advisor, Nommo, had articles praising the notorious anti-Semitic Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Subsequently the paper wrote about the “white Zionist f*cks” who had objected to their praise for the Protocols.

It took serious work to get the UCLA administration to act and admonish the students that there was something abhorrent about their bigotry, especially in a university funded publication. Ultimately, the university pulled some of its advertising in the paper (it still published it) and condemned the “hatred and divisiveness and engaging in personal and group denigration.” There was no widespread outrage, there was no apology—it was almost business as usual—“students will be students”.

Today, the story line is markedly different and, mercifully, these kinds of incidents are anomalies—that’s why they garner so much attention.

The measure of our society (contrary to Charles Blow’s assertion) is not the worst case scenarios that happen from time to time—there are, and always will be, jerks, fools and nasty bigots out there—but how society responds to these incidents and their perpetrators; is there outrage, condemnation, an understanding of what is wrong with what transpired and even apologies from the transgressors?

If there are, then the occasional bigotry—which is predictable and, today, almost always containable—can be dealt with. We are, after all, still “forming a more perfect union.”

What is not helpful is for the Chicken Littles of the world to claim that the “sky is falling” and that society is rotting while pressing forward with their particular agendas that often include a permanent state of kvetching.

We are moving in the right direction, it’s just that it is an occasionally bumpy road.

A Reality Check Read More »

Campaign ad shows Netanyahu speech before Congress

Despite denials that his speech to Congress was a bid to boost his party in national elections in Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s party released a campaign ad showing him being applauded by congressmen.

The 80-second ad released Thursday comes as polls show Netanyahu and his Likud Party trailing the opposition Zionist Union by between three and five seats in Israel’s Knesset.

The ad shows Netanyahu speaking in the House Chamber and shows at least one of his standing ovations from members of the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. It juxtaposes scenes of Netanyahu speaking to Knesset, panning the empty seats of his opposition, to scenes of what appear to be a full House chamber and wild applause.

At least 60 congressmen boycotted the speech, citing, among other reasons, its taking place March 3, exactly two weeks before the Israeli elections. Netanyahu and his defenders said the preeminent reason for the speech was the urgent need to oppose Iran nuclear talks backed by President Barack Obama. The deadline for an outline of an agreement in the talks is March 24.

Netanyahu spoke at the invitation of the House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), who in a breach of protocol did not consult the White House, congressional Democrats or the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. No Obama administration officials attended the speech, and Vice President Joe Biden, who conventionally co-chairs such events with the House speaker, was out of the country.

Obama declined to meet with Netanyahu while he was in Washington, also citing the proximity of Israel’s national elections.

Campaign ad shows Netanyahu speech before Congress Read More »

Brazil Jewish schools conclude first national conference

Brazil’s Jewish communities held their first national conference for the faculty of the country’s approximately 20 major Jewish schools.

Titled “National Encounter for Jewish Schools,” the two-day event’s opening session in Sao Paulo Sunday was attended by representatives from 18 Jewish schools from that city as well as from Rio de Janeiro and other locales, including Recife in the north and Porto Alegre in Brazil’s south.

Participants said they would work to turn the conference into an annual event.

In a statement about the March 8-9 event, CONIB, the umbrella group that organized the meeting, wrote that one of the objectives was to form a Jewish education network that transcends some of the ideological divides that have limited parents’ choices in the country. Brazil, home to South America’s second-largest Jewish community, has approximately 120,000 Jews.

Silvio Hotimsky, a prominent educator and psychoanalyst from Sao Paulo who spoke at the event, said that parents seeking Jewish schools for their children were forced to choose between a more secular Jewish education that inspired unconditional support for Israel as one of its core values, and a religious attitude that cultivated insularism.

“In the 19th and 20th century, Judaism began being regarded as part of dichotomy: Either it was connected to Israel, or it was connected to religion,” he said “Thus, Judaism’s spiritual and cultural vision was diminished.” Parents, he said, need “an option that connects to the root” of Judaism.

Another issue discussed at the conference was job placement for teachers who graduate from a recently launched program that trains teachers in Jewish studies at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, with support from the Jewish community. The program was launched in 2010 but not all the graduates have been able to find work at Jewish schools, according to Sonia Kramer, a teacher at the institution.

Coincidentally, the Brazilian conference took place at the same time North American Jewish day school educators were convening in Philadelphia. That conference drew more than 1,000 professionals from over 400 schools in the United States and Canada.

Brazil Jewish schools conclude first national conference Read More »

Kosha Dillz presents the 1st Annual official OY VEY! SXSW showcase

What is OY VEY!?

It's the most epic collaboration of all time! Acts from Montreal to Memphis and Tel Aviv to Washington Dc, NJ, LA and more! OY VEY! Bridges together culture of Jewish and Israeli vibes to the indie and hip hop culture. Kosha Dillz lives within to make you say OY VEY! – a yiddish word that is best explained as OMG or WTF!

This is the 4th year of OY VEY! in Austin Texas but the first year as an official SXSW event! Let's make it a banger!

Show times are below. For more information, visit https://www.facebook.com/koshadillz

Kosha Dillz presents the 1st Annual official OY VEY! SXSW showcase Read More »

Paris’ Hyper Cacher market will reopen on Sunday

The kosher supermarket on the edge of Paris that was the site of a bloody hostage situation in January will reopen Sunday.

Hyper Cacher, which was badly damaged in the attack, has been renovated and restaffed, The Times of Israel reported.

On Jan. 9, two days after the shooting at Paris’ Charlie Hebdo magazine that left 12 dead, Muslim terrorist Amedy Coulibaly killed four Jewish hostages at the Hyper Cacher market before being killed by police who stormed the building.

The market, located in the Port de Vincennes neighborhood in eastern Paris, is part of the Hyper Cacher chain of kosher markets in France and Italy.

Paris’ Hyper Cacher market will reopen on Sunday Read More »

Israel opens embassy in Lithuania

Israel opened its first embassy in Lithuania.

The event was celebrated during a ceremony Thursday, the Baltic News Service reported, in the capital city of Vilnius, where one in four residents was Jewish before the Holocaust.

Lithuania used to have 250,000 Jews but the vast majority were killed by German Nazis and their local collaborators.

Israel’s first ambassador to the Baltic nation is Amir Maimon.

Lithuania opened its embassy in Israel shortly after the two countries established diplomatic relations, in 1992 — a year after Lithuania regained its independence from Russia following the fall of the Soviet Union. In 2012, Lithuania, which has been a member of the European Union since 2003, appointed a commercial attache to serve in Israel.

Israel, however, refrained from opening an embassy in Lithuania. The Jewish state was represented in Lithuania by Israel’s embassy in the capital of neighboring Riga.

“Flying a flag here in Vilnius carries a special significance. This is a country which is a cornerstone in Jewish heritage, where some of the great Jewish thinkers came from,” Dan Ushpizin, a senior Israeli diplomat who attended the ceremony Thursday, said during the event.

During the opening ceremony, a rabbi affixed a mezuzah  to the doorframe of the newly-opened embassy, BNS reported.

In recent years, the Lithuanian state’s equating of Nazism and Communism — Lithuania is the only country claiming that its people were the victims of a genocide that it said was perpetrated by the Soviet Union – have damaged the country’s reputation internationally and in Israel, where many perceived the claim as a means to exculpate Lithuania from its wartime government’s deep complicity in the Holocaust.

In 2008, Lithuanian prosecutors began probing three Holocaust survivors who were declared suspects of war crimes allegedly committed during World War II. The investigation was abandoned amid an international outcry.

Israel opens embassy in Lithuania Read More »

French court: Centrists slandered leftist with anti-Semitism claims

A French court found three center-right politicians guilty of defaming a far-left counterpart when they accused him of being affiliated with anti-Semites.

In the ruling Thursday by the Correctional Tribunal of Paris, the judge ordered the three Union for a Popular Movement politicians – Alain Juppe; Jean-François Copé and Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet – to each pay $1,300 to the defamed, Jean-Luc Mélenchon.

The ruling, according to Le Monde, concerns claims made by the three against Mélenchon, asserting that he has anti-Semitic acquaintances or that he associates with anti-Semites. The claims were made after he posted on his blog a text by the Greek composer Mikis Theodorakis against that government’s austerity measures.

In 2003, Theodorakis was quoted as saying that “Jews are the root cause of evil” in the world. But Melenchon said he had no knowledge of Theodorakis’ anti-Semitic statements when he posted the blog.

Separately, the French far-right author and Holocaust denier Alain Soral was called to appear before the same court on Thursday in connection with a complaint filed against him alleging incitement to racial hatred.

The complaint concerns a picture that Soral posted on his Facebook account in which he is performing the quenelle at a memorial site for Holocaust victims in Berlin.

The quenelle is a gesture that French Prime Minister Manuel Valls has called an anti-Semitic expression of hate, though its inventor, the French comedian Dieudonne M’bala M’bala, claims it’s a sign of discontent with the establishment. Both Dieudonne and Soral have multiple convictions for inciting hate against Jews and denying the Holocaust.

In an unrelated action, the Union of Jewish Students of France, or UEJF, on Wednesday announced that it and the SOS Racisme watchdog group had filed criminal charges against 10 members of the far-right National Front party for allegedly making racist statements.

French court: Centrists slandered leftist with anti-Semitism claims Read More »

2 men charged for links to Hyper Cacher shooter

Two men have been charged for their links to the Paris kosher market gunman who killed four Jewish hostages in January.

The men, identified as Amar R. and Said M. by the Associated Press, were charged for participating in a terrorist group with intent to commit a crime.

Amar R. exchanged over 600 text messages with the Hyper Cacher gunman Amedy Coulibaly between September and January. He also met with Coulibaly on Jan. 5 and 6, just days before the Charlie Hebdo shooting on Jan. 7 and Coulibaly’s killing of a French police officer on Jan. 8.

Said M.’s DNA was found on a stun gun Coulibaly had with him on Jan. 9 when he took hostages in the Hyper Cacher market and killed four before being killed by police officers in a raid.

The prosecutor said that Amar R. and Said M. contacted each other more than 1,200 times between February 2014 and January 2015 and met regularly. They also destroyed their phone microchips on Jan. 9, the day of the Hyper Cacher attack.

Two others who had been detained earlier this week in conjunction with the new suspects were released.

Coulibaly claimed allegiance to the Islamic State in a video that surfaced after his death. The Kouachi brothers, who carried out the Charlie Hebdo shootings, said that the attack was sponsored by Al-Qaeda’s branch in Yemen.

Coulibaly’s widow Hayat Boumeddiene left a few days before the attacks in France and is believed to be in Syria.

2 men charged for links to Hyper Cacher shooter Read More »