fbpx

December 25, 2014

This week in power: Roth firing and Hanukkah message

A roundup of the most talked about political and global stories in the Jewish world this week:

DCJCC change
Word came out this week that the DCJCC had decided to ” target=”_blank”>protested the change. “It needn’t be this way. An honest assessment of Israel, the Palestinians, the broader Middle East including Iran, and how all of this plays out on the world stage, is not going to lead to a global pogrom or to increased attacks on Israel,” ” target=”_blank”>added Sarah Irving at Electronic Intifada.

Hanukkah passes
Wednesday marked the end of the eight-day holiday. So what was the lesson this time around? “Its flickering lights in the cold darkness of winter remain a perennial reminder that the yearning of Jews for freedom – both national and spiritual – must not be extinguished or forgotten. Military and spiritual power – neither without the other – remain essential for the survival of the Jewish people,” ” target=”_blank”>noted The Daily Star in an editorial it runs every year at this time.

This week in power: Roth firing and Hanukkah message Read More »

The Great Leonard Beerman z”l: Inspiration through Word and Deed

Last week witnessed the passing of two towering giants, each of whom left a profound mark on Los Angeles and also served as proud citizens of the world: Rabbi Harold Schulweis z”l and Rabbi Leonard Beerman z”l. Schulweis transformed Valley Beth Shalom in Encino into a unique center of learning and action and then founded Jewish World Watch. Beerman was the founding rabbi of Leo Baeck Temple, one of the great centers of Jewish social justice work in this country. Both possessed a rare combination of qualities — brilliance, sagacity, eloquence, compassion and unstinting courage. Their deaths mark the passing of a generation of great rabbinic leaders that we may not see again — a generation that has defined the way we imagine and speak of ourselves as Jews. Rabbis Schulweis and Beerman not only lent us a language, but also modeled in their daily lives the prophetic imperative to uproot injustice wherever it may be found. It is hard to imagine a world without them. 

While I knew and admired Rabbi Schulweis from afar, I was privileged to call Leonard Beerman a close friend and a cherished mentor, a man I loved and respected greatly. His impact extended far and wide. He was one of the most important figures on the social justice landscape in Los Angeles over the last half-century, as well as one of the most influential rabbis in this country over that period. What he represented was the most uncommon of Jewish community leaders, a man for whom conformism was the enemy of conscience. He taught us, in the spirit of the Hebrew prophets, that it was necessary at times to deliver a bracing critique of our own actions but that this did not require abandoning our strong bond to and love for fellow Jews and Judaism. “To experience the awareness of our moral failure,” he once wrote, “is, paradoxically, to experience the dignity of our own humanity.” He taught us that love of our neighbor and love of our own were not mutually exclusive, that we could and must embrace the cause of Palestinian rights as we embraced the State of Israel, that we could and must fight for the rights of our Black and brown neighbors just as we built our own Jewish communal institutions. He believed tout court that the Jewish and the human were inextricable, part of the same DNA with which we are imprinted.

Leonard was one of the very few people before whose name I almost always added the words “the great.” I would not call him that in his presence, because Leonard would be embarrassed. Part of his greatness lay in his modesty. I came to see this quality often over the last dozen years or so when we both participated in a small group of Jews that met periodically in living rooms across West L.A. — usually in response to crisis — to formulate a progressive voice on Israeli politics. For the most part, it was a loud and unruly bunch in whose midst Leonard would initially remain silent. One wondered whether the great sage had been rendered mute in his advanced years. But then, just as the meeting was about to break up, typically without any consensus, Leonard would begin to speak. In perfectly formed, paragraph-length sentences, he would clarify, summarize and propel forward the discussion, insisting that we never escape our obligation to speak truth to power. Those in attendance were simply stunned by the clarity of mind and of moral vision. It was the distilled essence of inspiration.

A good part of that inspiration was Leonard’s way with words. From his early years in Pennsylvania and Michigan, he was a voracious lover of literature. Over time, he developed into a world-class orator whose sermons were bejeweled with gorgeous language and dazzling literary allusions. He particularly came to appreciate and rely on poetry; it was his favored form of spiritual communion, more so than prayer. On most occasions when we were together, he would bring out and declaim a poem, yet another teaching of his that we would do well to emulate. It is no surprise that in his famous final Yom Kippur sermon at Leo Baeck Temple on Oct. 4, 2014, memorialized by Kurt Streeter in his Nov. 26, 2014, Los Angeles Times article, Leonard began by quoting the poet W. H. Auden: “It is getting late. Is there no one to ask for us? Are we simply not wanted at all?” Leonard used these haunting words to ask on behalf of those not wanted or insufficiently valued — unforgettably, in the case of his final sermon, the innocent children of Gaza.

If Leonard had simply inspired through his bold words, it would have been enough. But he gave and taught more, inspiring us through his deeds. He was actively involved for decades in fighting for peace between Israelis and Palestinians, with a courage and creativity that few dared to demonstrate. In the 1960s and 1970s, he fought vigorously against the Vietnam War and the nuclear arms race. In fact, it was in the service of those causes that he met, 47 years ago, a man destined to become one of his closest friends, the Rev. George Regas, rector emeritus of All Saints Church in Pasadena. The two men united on an array of struggles, joined at the hip by a shared ethical charge that eroded theological differences between them. And before meeting Regas, he agitated and marched on behalf of civil rights for African-Americans, working together with major figures such as the Rev. James Lawson. His activity in this regard did not begin in the 1960s. Already as a rabbinical student at the Hebrew Union College in the 1940s in Cincinnati, where he served as student body president, Leonard joined with fellow students to attempt to break down segregation in that city’s restaurants. It was his own experience with anti-Semitism as a young man that inculcated in him an absolute intolerance for discrimination, whether against Jews in the 1930s or Muslims in the 2010s.

He was an indefatigable fighter for the downtrodden and stigmatized. It was, he once said, “the only war worth fighting.” And yet, it is a measure of the texture and complexity of his personality that, while a fighter, he defined himself as a pacifist, following in the wake of his father, Paul, and one of his great rabbinic heroes, the American Judah L. Magnes, who became the first president of the Hebrew University. Leonard met Magnes in 1947 while on an extended visit to Jerusalem. During that trip, he joined the Jewish self-defense group, the Haganah, believing that at that crucial juncture, it was imperative to defend the Jewish population from attacks by the Arab side. By the time he returned to the United States in 1948, however, he had become more and more convinced of pacifism, a position to which he has adhered ever since.

But the fight for justice never ceased. As someone who inspired through word and deed, Leonard was appropriately named. “Ki-shmo ken hu” (2 Samuel 25:25): As is his name, so is he. Leonard was as his name — lion-hearted in combatting injustice. He was a man of extraordinary courage, who used his intellectual and rhetorical gifts to show us all how to resist self-satisfaction in order to better the world.

Consistent to the last, he maintained his modesty. After living a life of greatness, he wondered at the end whether he had accumulated a body of work to leave behind. Of course, he did. He has left us a huge legacy — as much a challenge as a bequest. It is to live a life of commitment and meaning. Leonard insisted on a commitment to the wider world, one that began with a Jewish prophetic call but culminated in work on behalf of humanity at large.

Perhaps his last and greatest gift was to remind us that while thinking globally, we must act locally. The core of our humanity was built from the bottom up, from our very daily relationships. Here too, Leonard was a master teacher. He was an extraordinary husband to his beloved wife, Joan. He was a loving and devoted father and grandfather. And he was a deeply caring and giving friend. Like so may others, I mourn his loss with a heavy heart but celebrate the extraordinary example he set.

Only once in a generation are we privileged to have a figure like Leonard Beerman among us. He was a “lamed-vavnik,” one of the 36 hidden righteous ones who, according to Jewish tradition, preserve the moral balance of the universe. May Leonard Beerman’s memory be a blessing to all who were privileged to know him — and may we continue to learn from and build on his remarkable legacy.

David N. Myers teaches Jewish history at UCLA and was a close friend of Leonard Beerman. He plans to edit a volume of Rabbi Beerman’s teachings.

The Great Leonard Beerman z”l: Inspiration through Word and Deed Read More »

New construction approved in East Jerusalem

Israeli authorities approved hundreds of new homes in Jewish neighborhoods of eastern Jerusalem.

The approvals were issued Wednesday for the neighborhoods of Ramot and Har Homa, though reports varied on the number of units approved.

The Times of Israel reported that 243 new units had been approved for Ramot along with amendments to previously approved projects for another 270 units in Ramot and Har Homa. The Jerusalem Post reported that 380 units had been approved, with 307 in Ramot and 73 in Har Homa.

The city of Jerusalem said in a statement that the permits did not reflect any policy changes, adding that “we continue to build in all neighborhoods of the city according to a master plan for both Jews and Arabs.”

However, Jerusalem city councilor Pepe Alalu, a member of the opposition Meretz party, told the Times of Israel that officials were using the attention focused on Israel’s upcoming elections as cover to move forward with expanded construction.

The municipality of Jerusalem had previously approved $12.7 million in improvements for Har Homa, including funds for roads, parks, sidewalks and streetlights, according to the Jerusalem Post.

 

New construction approved in East Jerusalem Read More »

Israel returns bodies of Har Nof terrorists

Israel returned the bodies of two terrorists who killed five worshippers in an attack on a synagogue in the Har Nof neighborhood of Jerusalem.

The bodies were transferred to their families on Thursday, more than a month after attack during morning worship services at Bnei Torah Kehillat Yaakov, which left four rabbis and a police officer dead.

The two terrorists, Palestinian cousins Uday and Ghassan Abu Jamal, were buried shortly after the transfer in a West Bank cemetery and not in the eastern Jerusalem neighborhood of Jabel Mukaber where they had lived. The speedy interment was required by Israel, the Palestinian Maan news agency reported.

Only 40 relatives were allowed to attend the funeral and the families paid a $5,000 deposit to insure that they adhered to Israel’s stipulations.

Following the attack, Israel’s Interior Ministry revoked the residency permit of Ghassan Abu Jamal’s widow, requiring her to leave Israeli territory and stripping her of any financial benefits she receives from the state. Demolition orders also have been issued for the homes of both terrorists.

 

Israel returns bodies of Har Nof terrorists Read More »

Ex-envoy Michael Oren announces Knesset run

Michael Oren, the former Israeli envoy to the United States, will run in Israel’s upcoming elections.

Oren was presented Wednesday as a candidate for the new political party Kulanu, headed by former Communications Minister Moshe Kahlon, who left the Likud Party in 2013. Kahlon said Oren would help retain good relations with Israel’s allies.

“Michael Oren is the right person to handle this responsibility. He proved that, even when there are disagreements, he can maintain close ties. Michael is the best in his field,” Kahlon said Wednesday in Tel Aviv.

“Israel is at a critical junction,” Oren said. “I couldn’t look from the side and do nothing when Israel is under diplomatic attack.”

Oren, a resident of Jerusalem, earlier this year called for a unilateral Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank.

He resigned as Israeli ambassador to Washington in July 2013. He is now teaching at the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center in Israel and writing a book on his four years as ambassador in Washington. He is the author of the award-winning book “Six Days of War: June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East.”

 

Ex-envoy Michael Oren announces Knesset run Read More »

U.S. agency pays Alan Gross in contract settlement

The U.S. Agency for International Development has reportedly paid Alan Gross $3.2 million as part of a settlement of with his employer, Development Alternatives.

The settlement, announced Tuesday in a statement by USAID, aimed to resolve claims pending before the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. The statement did not name a figure, but media reports, citing a spokesperson for the federal agency, put the amount at $3.2 million.

“The settlement, agreed in principle in November, calls for payment by USAID for unanticipated claims under the cost-reimbursement contract, including claims related to Mr. Alan Gross. The settlement avoids the cost, delay and risks of further proceedings, and does not constitute an admission of liability by either party,” the statement said.

Gross, 65, a Jewish-American contractor, was arrested in Cuba in 2009 after setting up Internet access for the Cuban Jewish community while working as a contractor for the USAID. He was released earlier this month after five years in prison.

In 2012, Gross and his wife, Judy, filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government and Development Alternatives charging that Gross should have been better trained and informed of the risks before going to Cuba. The couple settled in May with Development Alternatives for an undisclosed amount.

U.S. agency pays Alan Gross in contract settlement Read More »

Israeli girl, 11, seriously injured in West Bank firebomb attack

An 11-year-old girl was seriously injured when a firebomb hit their car in the northern West Bank.

The girl, Ayala Shapira, was taken to a Tel Aviv hospital with third-degree burns over 50 percent of her body, including her face and upper body following the Thursday evening attack. She is unconscious and on a respirator, and her injuries are reported to be life-threatening.

Her father, 40, who rescued her from the car, is in light condition.

They were driving from their home in the El Matan outpost near Maale Shomron to a bat mitzvah at a synagogue in the neighboring community of Ginot Shomron.

The car was completely destroyed by fire.

Israeli troops entered a nearby Palestinian village to find the person who threw the firebomb.

The car of Ayala’s mother was hit by a firebomb a month ago, but she escaped unhurt.

Israeli girl, 11, seriously injured in West Bank firebomb attack Read More »

Argentina’s president adopts Jewish godson

Argentina’s president has accepted an official Jewish godson for the first time in the country’s history.

President Christina Fernandez described in seven tweets her meeting with her new godson, Yair Tawil, a member of a Chabad-Lubavitch family.

He was adopted as a godson under a law passed in the 1920s. The law was passed in order to counteract a legend that led to the death of Argentine boys. According to the legend, the seventh son, born after six boys without any girls in-between, becomes a werewolf whose bite can turn others into a werewolf.

The belief in the legend was so widespread that families were abandoning, giving up for adoption and even killing their own sons.

The law only applied to the biological children of Catholic families until the enacting of a presidential decree in 2009, which allows children from other religions to qualify.

The boys receive presidential protection, a gold medal and a scholarship for all studies until his 21st birthday.

Shlomo and Nehama Tawil, parents of seven boys, in 1993 wrote a letter to the president asking for the honor and were denied. But this year Yair wrote a letter to the president citing the 2009 decree, and asking for the designation of godson.

Yair Tawil on Tuesday became the first Jewish godson of a president in Argentina’s history.  Fernandez received the Yair, his parents and three of his brothers in her office, where they lit Chanukah candles together on a Chanukah menorah from Israel presented to the president by the Tawil family.

The president in her tweets and photos described to her 3.4 million Twitter followers the “magical moment” with a “marvelous family.” She described Yair as “a total sweety,” and his mother a “Queen Esther.”

She tweeted that the Tawils “are a very special family. They have a sort of peace, happiness and a lot of love that is not common.” The tweet included a link to the presidential blog, which includes more photos from the meeting.

Shlomo Tawil is the director of the Chabad House in Rosario, located in central Argentina

 

Argentina’s president adopts Jewish godson Read More »

Parting of the Ways? Haftarat Vayigash, Ezekiel 37:15-28

Two Jews, three opinions, says the adage. But in this week’s Haftarah, God promises to fix things:

This is what the Sovereign LORD says: I am going to take the stick of Joseph—which is in Ephraim’s hand—and of the Israelite tribes associated with him, and join it to Judah’s stick. I will make them into a single stick of wood, and they will become one in My hand.

That promise remains unfulfilled, to put it mildly. The Jewish people is not close to becoming one in God’s hand: we cannot agree on just about anything, be it theology, or ritual, or politics, or even who is a Jew. Conservative writer Michael Medved was surely correct when, several years ago, he observed that Jews can only agree on one thing: we are not Christian.

At some level, such argument represents a healthy development. Spiritually productive religious civilizations generate heresies. Jewish tradition celebrates argument, even holding that dissents must be recorded for use as persuasive authority by other courts (Eduyot 1:5-6). In the celebrated formulation, Beit Hillel and Beit Shammai argue about just about every aspect of Jewish law, with the conclusion being that, “these and those are the words of the living God.” (Eruvin 13b)

But it continued that “the law follows Hillel.” At some point a ruling authority must make a decision. To put it more precisely, sides might continue to argue, but there must be an agreed-upon method of making decisions. The legal theorist “>Yale Law School’s Scott Shapiro has argued (persuasively, in my view), that a Rule of Recognition is not strictly speaking a rule so much as a commitment to a plan of action. Put another way, no formal decision rule can survive unless accompanied by a series of value-laden informal norms.

That seems to put us right back where we started. The failure to agree on substance cannot yield a purely procedural result, because procedural rules have substantive consequences. (No wonder Israel lacks a constitution).

“> the Mussar tradition attempts to inculcate in us. The dialogue will not seek to establish consensus or agreement, but will insist on the manifestation of intellectual and moral virtues central to Jewish tradition. Such a search and eventual dialogue may not repair the schism, but it will bring about the best in all sides. In order to see why this might be true, let us consider the relevant middot.

Generosity. We must assume the best about our interlocutors’ intentions. It is very easy to discern a hidden agenda in the statements of those with whom we disagree (I know this because I have a bad habit of doing it). Writings, statements, and even actions by others must be seen, to use a legal commonplace, in the light most favorable to the doer.

Generosity also requires us to work creatively in reaching out. On a plane flight a couple of years ago, I found myself sitting next a very frum rabbi whose day job was inspecting food production for the Orthodox Union. We got to talking, and he mentioned “>Nashuva has attracted hundreds of people to her Shabbat services. He praised her, and said she “is a quite a dynamic…uh…rabbinic…figure.”

It was quite a moving moment for me, because I realized that he just could not bring himself to call a woman a “rabbi.” But he was searching for something that would allow him to honor her yet maintain integrity to his own vision of Judaism. I try to keep this rabbi’s tentative and halting words whenever I confront beliefs that discomfit me.

Non-defensiveness. Judaism demands politeness (“do not whiten the face of your fellow,” instructs the Talmud) but it virtually never permits dishonesty. The Tochacha, or rebuke, serves a key function in Jewish religious dialogue: “You shall certainly rebuke your comrade, and you shall not bear sin on his account.” (Vayikra 19:17). Such an emphasis puts a responsibility on the critic, but an even greater burden on the recipient, namely, to take criticism as an opportunity for learning and growth. If someone criticizes my practice of Judaism, I need to listen and consider carefully the merits of the critique. That is hard because one’s spiritual life is very personal: of course I would take it personally! But no learning can occur otherwise.

Curiosity. Before we can criticize, we must learn. And in order to learn, we must actually want to learn. Curiosity is not generally regarded as a moral virtue; most Mussar texts do not list it as a middah that we need to cultivate. It is inherent, however, in the crucial middah of humility. If we are truly humble, then we recognize the vast universe of crucial truths that we do not know. And if they are crucial truths, then we must learn them. Maximal Jewish unity, then, might not require compromise, but it does demand a genuine desire to learn from those who oppose us.

This middah is rarer than one might think. “>Parting Of The Ways, as occurred between Judaism and Christianity in the late 1st century. At the very least, when we part, we will be the best separate religions that we can be, and by staying in dialogue, we will prepare ourselves for the time in which God brings us together.

Parting of the Ways? Haftarat Vayigash, Ezekiel 37:15-28 Read More »

Beauty is not in the eye of the beholder, it is objective.

It is no particular secret that human beings enjoy looking at aesthetically pleasing things, whether it is art, nature, or just other people. Our eyes are drawn to beauty, to the pleasing colours, lines, and shapes of the world around us, which in turn play a substantial role in igniting in use a vast array of feelings. Yet, have you asked yourself: What is the moral obligation that aesthetics holds over us?

We look at things which are pleasing to our eyes regardless of what they may be, and for a second we realize that reality is there, and our eyes perceive it. Regardless of how your eyes try to perceive a particular painting for instance, or a particular person, you cannot change the reality of their aesthetics. Thus the moral necessity of aesthetics is to understand that they are what they are, and we cannot make them what we want them to be. The greatest lie that we have been told therefore is that beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Beauty is an universal aspect of life. A painting is aesthetically pleasing regardless of the fact that an individual says that it is not. A man or a woman is handsome/beautiful regardless of the opinions of other men or women. In fact the origins of this term stems out of a spree of paramount jealousy. When a man looks upon a painting by Caravaggio he knows the qualities and beauty of its design, but chooses to say that it is ugly because he himself cannot paint such beauty, or rather because he holds some personal distaste for other’s achievement. The same can be seen between people.

Who is it that says that “beauty is in the eye of the beholder”. Is it not usually the man or woman who is jealous of the appearance of others, and needs to justify their feelings of insecurity by affirming that beauty is not an universal objective thing, but subjective to all men and women?

Every time a person says that “I do not care about looks”, is the time when they present you with an egregious lie. When your husband or wife has gained weight, although you love them immensely, would you rather not see them revert to their original youthful weight? When you go through a museum do you no want to leave the random boring paintings of pseudo-modernism and go straight to the classics, where aesthetics reigns supreme?

Beauty is an objective standard, yet how each man or woman chooses to perceive it although subjective is guided by emotional whims of inadequacy or repression. Why do people hate Renaissance and Baroque art? Because of its immense beauty, grandeur, and eloquence. It is the same mechanism by which people hate those that are physically attractive- jealousy and inadequacy. When one sees a model, the immediate mechanism that they use to protect their fragile egos is to say that “looks are not everything”, or “I am not attracted to them”. This is a lie. It is as if they reject those that are beautiful/handsome in the fear that they themselves might be rejected. The same concept is applied to art.

People call classicism pretentious, the same way that they call Cindy or Robert, the most beautiful people at the office, stuck up and arrogant, when most of the time that is not the case.

Beauty therefore is something that exists without your acknowledgement of it, it is not culturally defined. When you hear the old tale that in the 17th century, women were attracted to larger men because that meant they had status and money. Well, of course they were “attracted” to them as they wanted to eat, not because they found them aesthetically pleasing. Beauty is not some subjective interpretation of societal mores, but a simple biological reality. Today, fortunately, women can provide for themselves and do not need to rely on those “men of property”.

There is value in what is inside a painting, just as much as if there is something outside of it. Meaning that a Caravaggio that is beautiful, but has no symbolism, narrative or ideas is typically boring. One that has only ideas and narratives, but is simply ugly to look at is just as bad. What is then the best type of painting? One which employs both. The same can be said of human beings. The inside and outside count the same in the real world, and a rejection of that is to evade reality.

Beauty is not in the eye of the beholder, it is objective. Read More »