fbpx

December 23, 2014

Chanuka Dish #6: Isra-lite

Chanuka is the Jewish Festival of Lights, and the Jewish people are a Light unto the nations. And don’t forget that this all began with “Let there be light.” All true, but let’s face facts. It’s the seventh night of Chanuka, and what with the latkes, sufganiot (jelly donuts), chocolate chanuka gelt and all the other manner of partying (since we’re Jewish, this means eating) we’ve been doing for the past six days, what we really need now is “lite.” As in no-cal soda, no-fat celery latkes and biting the bullet – literally, to keep from biting anything else.

Unfortunately, I’m a little lite on low calorie recipes myself, but “>recipes that do just that.

So enjoy the rest of the holiday. But keep it lite.

Chanuka Dish #6: Isra-lite Read More »

Israelis Have to Choose

It is clear that with the coming Israeli elections on March 17 that Israelis have an opportunity to make an important choice. There are essentially two options and everyone knows what they are. Each carries risk. The question is, which will most likely secure Israel as a democracy and homeland for the Jewish people while restoring Israel's credibility within the international community, and which will not.

Option 1 – A negotiated 2 states for 2 peoples end-of-conflict agreement with international and moderate Arab support that would create a Palestinian State in the West Bank and Gaza alongside the State of Israel. The two states would have clear borders based on the 1967 lines with adjustments made to include within Israel the large Israeli settlement blocks thus embracing 80% of Israeli settlers into Israel. Land swaps of equivalent land would be included in the state of Palestine. East Jerusalem would become the capital of Palestine and the world would at last recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s eternal capital. Security guarantees would be set for the holy city. The West Bank and Gaza would be demilitarized except for Palestinian police forces. All Palestinian refugees would have the right of return to Palestine and not to Israel with limited family reunification in Israel. Those Palestinians who wish to carry Palestinian citizenship and stay in Israel could do so, and the same could be said of Israelis who choose to live in the new State of Palestine. Each would be subject to the laws of the state in which they live. Israel would end its occupation of the West Bank and it would remove all restrictions from Gaza except for the importing of military weaponry. There would be no “Greater Israel” and no “Greater Palestine” in the future. Peace agreements would be forged between Israel and all moderate Arab and Muslim nations. There would be an end to the BDS movement against Israel as well as an end to all threats against Israel by the UN, the Hague and international criminal courts. UNRWA (the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees) would be completely dismantled. The international community would assist the new state of Palestine in every way possible to survive economically. Gaza would be rebuilt. Gaza and the West Bank would be linked with a secure rail system thus enabling the Palestinians to move themselves and their goods freely between these two areas of the state of Palestine without having to pass through Israel.

Risks with Option 1 – There likely will continue to be sporadic terrorism against Israelis from Palestinian rejectionists and extremists that would have to be handled forcefully by both Israeli and Palestinian security forces working in tandem with each other, as they have been doing effectively in the West Bank. If the peace falls apart, there likely would be continued armed conflict. Israeli extremists who do not accept this agreement and act out violently against Palestinians or the IDF would have to be forcefully restrained, arrested, prosecuted, and imprisoned.

Option 2 – The status quo continues with eventual Israeli annexation of the West Bank resulting in a one-state solution of the conflict embracing all the land from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea and including its 2.5 million hostile Palestinian Arab residents. Either these Palestinians would become voting citizens of the state of Israel in which case Israel will cease to be a Jewish state because the populations between Jews and Arabs will be equal, or they are denied Israeli citizenship and the right to vote in which case Israel will cease to be a democracy. Israel would continue to build more settlements everywhere with potential efforts to force or induce Palestinians living in the West Bank to leave their homes and live outside the state of Israel.

Risks with Option 2 – Increasingly, Israel will be internationally isolated and there will be permanent war. European parliaments are already voting to support a Palestinian state and that will continue. Strains between the United States and Israel will also continue with a clear possibility that the United States' special relationship with Israel will diminish and evaporate. Should that happen, the pro-Israel American Jewish community will have an increasingly difficult time making Israel’s case before Congress and the President. Anti-Semitic attacks will likely multiply around the world against synagogues, Jewish community centers and institutions, and against individual Jews walking the streets. Israel will become a pariah nation and the Zionist dream of the Jewish state being the greatest experiment in the history of Jewish ethical living will be destroyed. 

It should be obvious to anyone with his/her eyes open that time is not working in Israel’s favor. Despite recalcitrance by the Palestinian leadership and their abject failure to educate their children and societies for peaceful coexistence with Israelis, as well as many missed diplomatic opportunities to move forward towards a two-state solution, a new Israeli government that is committed to both Israel’s security and settling this conflict once and for all in a two-state solution (as the new party led by Labor's Yitzhak Herzog and Tenua's Tzipi Livni) may well open up new possibilities for partnership with Palestinian leaders who wish to live in peace side by side with the state of Israel in a state of Palestine. There are many such leaders but as the politics have become increasingly polarized, their voices have been stilled.

This is the time for the Israeli electorate to choose, and we ought to support those Israeli politicians who we believe are best capable of delivering a secure, Jewish and democratic future for the state of Israel.

Yes, the situation is complicated and dangerous.

Yes, there is enormous mistrust between the two sides.

Yes, there are extremists in each community (Israeli and Palestinian) who are making progress very difficult.

But, ein breira – there is no alternative except to keep trying and then to keep trying some more. There is too much at stake for the state of Israel and the Jewish people not to give our support to those who favor Option #1 above.

Israelis Have to Choose Read More »

Sony Pictures puts ‘The Interview’ back in theaters

Sony Pictures said on Tuesday it will release “The Interview” to a limited number of theaters on Dec. 25, less than a week after it canceled the comedy's release following a devastating cyberattack blamed on North Korea.

[ROB ESHMAN: How to hack the Sony hackers]

The decision comes after hundreds of independent theaters said they wanted to screen the film, about a fictional plot to assassinate North Korea leader Kim Jong Un, which major theater chains backed out of last week owing to security concerns.

“We have never given up on releasing 'The Interview' and we're excited our movie will be in a number of theaters on Christmas Day,” Sony Pictures Chief Executive Michael Lynton said in a statement.

“At the same time, we are continuing our efforts to secure more platforms and more theaters so that this movie reaches the largest possible audience.”

Sony Pictures, which had said that a limited release of the $44 million film was out of question, came under pressure to release the movie after President Barack Obama said last Friday that the studio “made a mistake” by bowing to intimidation.

That rare public rebuke of a corporation fueled the debate over freedom of speech and whether Hollywood was engaging in self-censorship. Lynton put the blame on movie theaters and tried to establish his studio' commitment to the First Amendment.

The cyberattack, which began last month, crippled Sony Pictures' computer system and led to an embarrassing leak of internal emails and sensitive documents.

The hackers, operating under the moniker Guardians of Peace, made unspecified threats to theaters planning to show the film, which stars Seth Rogen and James Franco. They demanded that Sony cancel the film's release.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has pinned the cyberattack on North Korea, which had protested the film as far back as June. North Korea has denied it is behind the attack.

It was unclear how many theaters would be allowed to screen “The Interview” and if major movie chains that had decided not to open the film would join the group of authorized exhibitors.

Texas-based Alamo Drafthouse Cinema was one of the first to say it was authorized to screen the film. A theater in Atlanta, the Plaza Atlanta, said on social media that it will also show the film.

Media outlets also reported that Sony Pictures had struck a deal for a video-on-demand release of “The Interview” on Dec. 25 as well. Reuters was not able to immediately confirm the reports.

An online petition launched by Art House Convergence, a de facto association of independent cinemas that pledged to screen “The Interview” if Sony chose to release it, had drawn more than 500 signatures from independent theater owners, programmers and operators.

Sony Pictures puts ‘The Interview’ back in theaters Read More »

#MyDanaPoint: Dine at Raya, The Ritz Carlton Laguna Nigel

What To Do With Leftover Challah [recipe]

Coconut Milk Challah Bread Pudding

As you may already know, my definition of good food is that which makes you want to roll on the floor and shout mammmmmmaaaaa! And as you also may know, I’m not actually referring to my mother, as she never cooked, but to the Italian mamme who fed me while I lived in Italy.

I learned in Italy that it’s not how food tastes, it’s how food makes us feel that counts.  While this bread pudding tastes like the perfect, not-too-sweet harmony between the rich eggy challah, the vanilla-and-cinnamon-spiked coconut milk, and a touch of Tuscan dessert wine, it feels like a love too pure for words to express.

In fact, when I sat my father down for a piece and witnessed his face soften with the first bite, I threw my arms around him enthusiastically and asked, “Dad, doesn’t this taste like your childhood?”

“Yes,” he responded, wide-eyed. “Like the childhood I never had.”

I saddened, but the truth is I never had a childhood that tasted like this bread pudding either. I’m not sure if anyone has. It’s not always easy to be a child, tossed around the world of cynicism and ego,  and yet we associate the innocence of childhood with a full heart.  How else can we touch that intimate and intangible place inside of us except with food? This Challah Bread Pudding is as close as I have come.

Enjoy and share with someone you love.

P.S. I purposely made this Challah Bread Pudding not too sweet so you can taste the subtlety of the flavors and not just the sugar. I recommend it for an afternoon tea, brunch or a dessert after a light, low-carb meal.

P.P.S. You can cut the recipe in half for a smaller portion.

For the Bread Pudding

Ingredients

In Sick Heart Patients, Less is More!

In the year 2000, Israeli physicians had a major labor strike during which thousands of elective visits and surgeries were canceled, but paradoxically mortality rates fell dramatically during the same year.

This week in JAMA, Harvard Medical School researchers published a study that found the survival rate for high-risk cardiac arrest patients rose 10% when admitted to prominent teaching hospitals packed with cardiologists for cardiac conventions.

They examined the 30-day mortality rate for 8,570 Medicare beneficiaries who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure or cardiac arrest on national cardiology meeting dates from 2002 to 2011.  Those rates were compared to similar cohorts admitted three weeks before and after meetings. 

17% of high-risk heart failure patients died on meeting dates, whereas almost 25% died on non-meeting dates.  In high-risk cardiac arrest patients, 59% died on meeting days, 69% on non-meeting days.  Researchers found that teaching hospitals performed 7% fewer angioplasties on high-risk myocardial infarction patients during convention dates.

Researchers wrote that when treating high-risk heart patients, the answer may be that “less is more….One explanation for these findings is that the intensity of care provided during meeting dates is lower and that for high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease, the harms of this care may unexpectedly outweigh the benefits.”

High-risk heart patients are older people with multiple chronic medical conditions such as obesity, emphysema, diabetes, high blood pressure, renal impairment.

In the accompanying editorial and UC San Francisco cardiologist Dr. Rita Redberg wrote “One possibility is that more interventions in high-risk patients with heart failure and cardiac arrest leads to high mortality…Indeed, some high-risk interventions, such as balloon pumps or ventricular assist devices, are being used in populations in which they are not shown to improve outcomes, and recent reports have raised concerns about high rates of fatal complications from pump thrombosis and other problems.”

In Sick Heart Patients, Less is More! Read More »

A Family’s Journey – Czechoslovakia to Nebraska to Cleveland

Robert Howard Goldhamer passed away at 94 years old.  What follows is taken from his oral history interview, conducted when he was 83. 

“My father’s parents, Max and Leba Goldhamer, came to this country around 1870 from Czechoslovakia. They came with their one child, my uncle Will.

The first thing they did when they reached America was to move all the way out to what was a fairly primitive West in those days–to Omaha, Nebraska. Grandpa had been a school teacher before they left Europe, but he didn't go into that trade when he came here, because he didn’t speak English. Instead, they tried to make a living there by running a saloon, which was apparently a pretty reputable kind of business that anybody could get into without a lot of capital outlay.

The story I heard is that my grandmother wasn't comfortable with the Indians who came into the saloon. So the family moved to Cleveland where they had some family.

In Cleveland, my grandfather became a peddler.  He would somehow get to the outskirts of the city and, with a pack on his back filled with small hardware and sewing and notion items, he would call upon farms and small towns. He also tried his hand at what my father called “the Dairy business.” My guess is that the farmers brought unpasteurized milk in those large cans into town, and Grandpa would buy a quantity of milk from them. Then, with a horse and wagon, he'd peddle it into the neighborhoods. This was at a time when there were no such things as dairies as we know them today, so that was raw milk.

My father, Samuel Goldhamer, was born in 1872, near downtown Cleveland.

When my father was nine or ten, he had a newspaper route. In those days public transportation was horse-drawn, and there were horse cars that went up the main streets–St. Clair, Superior, Euclid Avenue.  Dad described running after a moving horse car and jumping on with his newspapers.

In the late 1800's, Euclid Avenue had a section that was known as “Millionaire's Row.” On this street lived people like John Rockefeller, a founder of Standard Oil Company, Charles F. Brush, who invented the carbon arc street lamp, John Hay, who had been Abraham Lincoln’s personal secretary, and other people who were the wealthy of early Cleveland.  Dad delivered newspapers to their homes. He described how, in the winter, the city would close down several blocks on Euclid Avenue and everyone would turn out to watch those wealthy families race with their horse-drawn sleighs.

Dad adored his older brother, Will, who was a very inventive guy. One thing he  made was a brass cannon. Dad remembered how, at four in the morning on the Fourth of July, Will would go down to the Public Square and set off his brass cannon. It was just his way of starting the holiday off for the city.

Another older brother, Lou, was a bell boy at the Hawley House, one of Cleveland's earliest hotels, where important people used to stay. They say President Lincoln stayed there once. Working there, Lou got familiar with all kinds of people who came through Cleveland. Among the people he met were “the Race Track Crowd,” as my father called them.  Lou got so interested in these people that when he was 17, he ran off with them. Occasionally people would report they'd seen him around the country, usually at race tracks.

When my father was maybe seven or eight, Lou returned. Dad remembers the day when he saw this young man with a suitcase walking down the street, and he somehow knew that was Lou coming back home.

Lou married Fanny Unger, and they had a grocery store for awhile. One day, Lou had some turnips displayed outside his grocery store, and somebody asked him if those were good to eat.  Lou's answer was, “Well, my horse likes 'em.”

My dad was always interested in drawing and, when he was ten, his mother decided that his interest in art should be encouraged. He started art lessons which were given on the third floor of the Cleveland City Hall. Dad continued those lessons until he was 13, at which time it was decided he should stop because the next step would be life drawing. They didn't think a 13 year old boy should be drawing nudes.

However, these art lessons influenced some of his work, because when he graduated high school, he got a job designing lace patterns for a company which owned a machine that produced lacework.

From that work, he got a job working for a woman's ready-to-wear outfit in Cleveland. They'd send him on the road into towns in Indiana. He quit that pretty soon because he decided he didn't like selling.

His next job was working for a men's clothing factory, and he was soon secretary to the president of the company. In those days there were many male secretaries. He was at this time courting my mother, Lena Klein. I think they met at a dance somewhere. He would rent a horse and buggy and take her for picnics out all the way to the foot of Cedar Hill where there was a favorite beautiful picnic place called Blue Rocks Springs. She liked the trips, I guess, because she agreed to marry him. In 1903 they got married. Dad was then working with this men's clothing manufacturer.

Within a year or two after he started that job, some of the leaders of the Jewish Community decided that there should be a central fund-raising organization and a fund dispersing organization for the Jewish charities in Cleveland. These numbered quite a few organizations by then–social service agencies, orphans' home, relief organizations and others. So they founded the Jewish Welfare Federation.They were looking for somebody to administer the organization, and Dad's employer recommended him. He got the job and the Jewish Welfare Federation of Cleveland started with Sam Goldhamer and a desk with paper and pencils.

His first job apparently was to make some kind of a census of the Jewish community, so they would know how to go after people and raise funds. He was in on the beginning of the total organization and the development of the Federation, and he retired after 50  years as its Executive Director, a position that he held all his life.”

A Family’s Journey – Czechoslovakia to Nebraska to Cleveland Read More »