fbpx

June 4, 2014

Jewish museum shooting suspect refuses extradition to Belgium

The French national suspected of having shot three people dead in the Jewish Museum in Brussels last month refused on Wednesday to be extradited from France to Belgium, prosecutors and his lawyer said.

Mehdi Nemmouche, 29, who has been in police custody since his arrest on Friday in the southern city of Marseille, refused to leave France when presented with a European arrest warrant during a court hearing in Versailles outside Paris.

The suspect has another court appearance on Thursday. If he refuses extradition again, he can appeal the prosecutor's demand to a higher court, but this would likely only delay rather than block his transfer to Brussels, legal sources said.

Prosecutors say the repeat-offender, who they say spent most of 2013 fighting in Syria with Islamist rebels, is being held under anti-terror laws on suspicion of murder, attempted murder and possession of weapons in relation to the May 24 attack.

“We would like him to be judged under French jurisdiction,” Nemmouche's lawyer, Apolin Pepiezep, told iTele. “Nothing today proves that Mehdi Nemmouche is the culprit.”

The EU-wide system of arrest warrants, in effect since 2004, is designed to ensure faster and simpler extraditions. The European Commission says an extradition within EU member states takes on average 48 days if the suspect does not agree to it.

An Israeli couple and a French woman were killed in the attack in the Jewish Museum in the Belgian capital by a man who opened fire with a Kalashnikov.

When arrested at a Marseille bus terminal, Nemmouche was carrying a Kalashnikov rifle, another gun and ammunition similar to that used in the shooting, prosecutors said. His lawyer said Nemmouche told police he had stolen them from a car in Brussels.

Nemmouche, who comes from Roubaix near the Belgian border, has already served five different sentences in French jails, where he became a radical Islamist, prosecutors have said.

Writing and additional reporting by Alexandria Sage; Editing by Mark John and Tom Heneghan

Jewish museum shooting suspect refuses extradition to Belgium Read More »

David Geffen graduates with top honor from UCLA — sort of

Philanthropist and entertainment mogul David Geffen was awarded the UCLA Medal, the university’s highest honor, during the Hippocratic Oath Ceremony for Geffen School of Medicine graduates on May 30.

Presented by UCLA Chancellor Gene Block, who described the prize as “super-select,” Geffen became the latest addition to a diverse list of recipients that includes Bill and Hillary Clinton and architect Frank Gehry.

Accepting the award, Geffen told the 200 graduates assembled on the lawn outside Perloff Hall, “I went here, too — sort of …”

He recalled the time he first visited the UCLA campus, where Geffen’s brother was a second-year law school student, just after his own high school graduation in 1960.

“I remember walking around this campus wishing I had worked hard enough to attend this school,” Geffen said.

Not that the future mogul would let a trifling acceptance letter get in his way. On the application to work in the mailroom of the William Morris Agency, one of his first entertainment jobs, Geffen lied and said he had graduated from UCLA.

“Every single day I came in [to work] early, waiting for the letter that would reveal to my boss I was not a college graduate,” he said. Geffen eventually intercepted the letter confirming his absence from the UCLA student database.

“I stuffed it in my pocket, saved it and framed it,” he said proudly, knowing his mischievous tale is now the stuff of Hollywood legend. “So, you can see, from the very beginning of my career, UCLA was very important to me!”

The prestigious medal, created in 1979, served as a tribute to Geffen’s entertainment career as well as his philanthropic achievements. In 2002, Geffen made history when he announced the largest single donation ever to a U.S. medical school, a $200 million unrestricted gift to the UCLA School of Medicine, which was swiftly renamed the Geffen School of Medicine. A decade later, he gave an additional $100 million to fund merit-based scholarships covering the entire cost of medical school, enabling an estimated 20 percent of future students to graduate debt-free.

Whether out of sheer generosity or penance for his rascally past, Geffen confessed, “Now I am in a position to repay UCLA.

“It is not possible for me to exaggerate how proud I am to have my name associated with this incredible institution,” he said in closing. “My mom always told me, ‘If you have your health, you have everything,’ [and] it turns out, she was right.”

David Geffen graduates with top honor from UCLA — sort of Read More »

Fighting rages in eastern Ukraine town, residents flee

Ukrainian government forces battled separatists with artillery and automatic weapons on Wednesday in a second day of fighting in and around Slaviansk, forcing many residents to flee.

The Kiev government, trying to break rebellions by pro-Russia militias, said over 300 rebels had been killed in the past 24 hours in the “anti-terrorist operation” centered on the eastern town, a strategically located separatist stronghold.

Rebels denied this, saying losses among the Ukrainian forces during an offensive begun on Tuesday exceeded theirs.

At an army checkpoint on the edge of town, heavy artillery shelling could be heard while a plume of black smoke rose above the outskirts. Automatic gunfire rattled out from nearby fields.

Families fled the fighting through a barbed-wire checkpoint with only as much as they could carry. “It's a mess,” sobbed a young woman as she clutched her husband's arm. “It's war.”

Andrei Bander left with his four-year-old daughter. “We are going. We don't even know where. We will head to Russia though because it's clear we need to leave Ukraine,” he said, waiting for a taxi in a small a no-man's land between the two sides.

In support for the Ukrainian forces, acting President Oleksander Turchinov and Interior Minister Arsen Avakov paid an impromptu visit, clad in flak jackets, to another army roadblock on the far side of the encircled town on Wednesday.

A spokesman for government forces said two soldiers had been killed and 45 wounded since Kiev launched its offensive near Slaviansk with aircraft, helicopters and artillery.

POROSHENKO PLAN

Separatists controlling the town since early April denied the government's casualty figures and claimed to have shot down an army helicopter – something denied in turn by Kiev.

“Losses to the Ukrainian side were more than ours,” said Aleksander Boroday, “prime minister” of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic. He said nine had died and 15 were injured among separatists forces in Slaviansk.

At a news conference in the regional capital Donetsk, he said separatists would mobilize forces and train volunteers to fight in Slaviansk and defend their positions in Donetsk.

President-elect Petro Poroshenko ordered the resumption of operations by government forces soon after his May 25 election to quell the rebellion by militia in the Russian-speaking, where people were largely unable or unwilling to vote in the poll.

In Warsaw, where he met U.S. President Barack Obama, he said he would unveil a plan for a “peaceful resolution” of the situation in the east after his inauguration next Saturday.

Kiev says the fighting was stirred up by Moscow, which opposes its pro-Western course, and accuses Russia of letting volunteers cross into Ukraine to fight alongside the rebels.

Moscow denies this and renewed calls on Wednesday for Ukraine to open dialogue with the separatists. But the separatists look to Moscow for help.

“When is (Russian President Vladimir) Putin going to come help us?” asked a young man in fatigues at a rebel checkpoint.

ANTAGONISM TOWARDS KIEV

A few kilometers away, a man from central Ukraine said he belonged to a separatist group called the Russian Orthodox army. “This is our land. We will stand here until the last,” he said.

Slaviansk, a separatist stronghold of 130,000, has strategic value since it sits at the center of the Donbass region at the cross-roads of eastern Ukraine's three main regions.

Government forces appeared to be tightening their grip but it was too soon to predict the outcome. A government camp in Luhansk, further to the east on the Russian border, was evacuated after an attack by separatists on Monday.

The military operation has hardened antagonism against the present government that came to power when President Viktor Yanokovich was toppled in February after mass protests in Kiev.

“Our Ukrainian army is not protecting us, instead it is attacking us. Thanks to them I have to flee my own land,” said Larissa Zhuratova, a Slaviansk resident piling onto a bus full of refugees bound for Moscow.

Men were mostly not being let through the army checkpoint.

At a run-down dormitory in a village some 100 km south of the fighting, an eight-year-old refugee mimicked the sound of shelling. “It went ba-boom. We sat in the bathtub,” little Vitaly said, playing with toys gifted by local residents.

Additional reporting by Thomas Grove in Donetsk and Pavel Polityuk in Kiev; Writing by Alissa; de Carbonnel and Richard Balmforth; Editing by Tom Heneghan

Fighting rages in eastern Ukraine town, residents flee Read More »

Election 2014: Elan Carr, a Republican Jew, and Ted Lieu, a Democrat, advance to round two

When the first round of voting in the race to succeed Rep. Henry Waxman wrapped up on June 3, voters in the 33rd Congressional district had handed Elan Carr, a Republican Jewish gang prosecutor, a first place finish. But it’s State Sen. Ted Lieu, the Democratic nominee who finished second, who emerged as the immediate favorite in this heavily Democratic district.

Turnout across the state was low, and only 18 percent of registered voters who live in the 33rd district, which runs along the coast from the South Bay to Malibu and includes Beverly Hills and other parts of the Westside, cast ballots. Although California’s new top-two system could have allowed two Democrats to vie for the seat in the second round, during the primary campaign, as Carr racked up donations and locked up support from local and national Republican leaders, it became increasingly likely that the 11 Democratic candidates on the ballot would split their constituency and that only one of the best-known among them would advance to the November ballot.

Indeed, Wendy Greuel, a former Los Angeles Controller and onetime L.A. City Council member, finished less than 3 percentage points behind Lieu. Two other prominent and well-funded Jewish candidates in the race, Marianne Williamson and Matt Miller, finished not too far behind.

But Lieu, who had won the Democratic Party’s nomination and the strong support of Democrats for Israel in advance of the primary, won the coveted second spot and is now presumed to be the frontrunner.

Not that it’s a done deal.

“Carr is an underdog, but you can’t write him off,” Raphael Sonenshein, executive director of the Pat Brown Institute for Public Affairs at CSU Los Angeles and a Journal columnist, said in an interview on June 4. “It’s a district that’s gotten a bit more Republican in the last redistricting.”

Voters in the 3rd District of L.A. County also chose two runoff candidates for the Board of Supervisors. Sheila Kuehl, who has served in the state’s Assembly and Senate, finished first, followed by Bobby Shriver, a former Santa Monica Councilman and Mayor; the pair now will face off in the second round – despite some momentum that had developed for a third candidate, West Hollywood City Councilman John Duran, near the end of the campaign, who was endorsed by L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti and the Los Angeles Times.

“He probably got the endorsements he got a bit too late,” Sonenshein said. He also received the endorsement of Gloria Molina, another member of the board of supervisors who will be termed out at the end of 2014. “Probably a lot of people had already voted absentee. He probably just ran out of time and out of money.”

Keuhl garnered 36 percent of the votes, which was about eight percentage points more than Shriver got. It remains to be seen which of the self-described progressives Duran, who campaigned on a business-friendly platform, will choose to endorse for the seat currently held by Zev Yaroslavsky, who declined to endorse a successor before the primary.

While the results in the Waxman and Yaroslavsky districts weren’t entirely unexpected, other preliminary outcomes from Tuesday’s election left astute observers across the state shaking their heads.

“I said some harsh things in the past about the top two. About the dismal turnout and totally disengaged electorate back in 2012,” Joe Matthews wrote in a cheeky post for Fox and Hounds on June 4. “But after the dismal turnout and disengaged electorate of 2014, I see I was missing the point.

 “You can’t get results this fun,” Matthews continued, “with high turnout and voter engagement.”

Sonenshein also chalked up the low turnout to the adoption of the top-two system. “Most of the time, partisanship and partisan issues drive turnout.“ he said. “The top two intentionally mutes that. It sort of turns [congressional and statewide races] into the L.A. City races [which are nonpartisan], where you don’t know who’s who.”

And here’s another quirk of the top two system: Even in cases where it’s clear who’s going to win – especially where voters had a choice between an incumbent of one party running against a challenger from the opposing party – the two candidates will have to run the race a second time in November.

Assemblymember Richard Bloom, for example, will have to run again in November against Republican Bradly Torgan, despite winning almost three-fourths of the votes cast in this week’s election. (Indeed, Torgan won roughly the same percentage of the vote in 2012 when he ran against Bloom and two other Democrats in the first round of voting in 2014.)

One more novelty of the top two system is hotly contested and expensive intraparty contests, and that’s likely what we’ll see in the 26th State Senate District, which Lieu vacated to run for Congress. A preponderance of Democratic voters has set up an unpredictable, intraparty battle between Ben Allen, a Jewish member of the Santa Monica School board, and Sandra Fluke, a women’s rights activist and attorney from West Hollywood.

Fluke first became nationally known in 2012 when, as a law student, she was  denied the chance to testify at a Congressional hearing where she had hoped to advocate that all medical insurers pay for birth control, In the wake of that, Rush Limbaugh called her a “slut” on his radio show.

Ben Allen’s supporters have referred to him as a “nice Jewish boy.” Both Fluke and Allen have amassed impressive rosters of endorsements; each spent about $350,000 during the primary.

Election 2014: Elan Carr, a Republican Jew, and Ted Lieu, a Democrat, advance to round two Read More »

Life’s last chapter, biopics and Jewish terrorists

Our film-going readers can look forward to an embarrassment of cinematic riches this summer, with an eclectic mix of movies promising something for almost everyone.

A few of the films will tear at your heartstrings.  Among these is “Lullaby,” which follows the journey of Jonathan (Garrett Hedlund), a 23-year-old aspiring singer-songwriter, estranged from his family, self-centered and rootless.  We meet him as he flies from California to New York to join his mother (Anne Archer) and sister (Jessica Brown Findlay) at the hospital bedside of his father, Robert (Richard Jenkins), who has been battling cancer for more than a decade.  Upon arriving, Jonathan learns that his father has decided to have his life support disconnected.

“I was particularly interested in right-to-die,” filmmaker Andrew Levitas said, “right to die with dignity, and just curious about, or investigating, the ways that people talk or don’t talk, in our culture, about death.”

Levitas said Jonathan has been stunted in many ways ever since he was 13, when his father was told he had six months to live. “He sort of became frozen in time, in sort of an emotional suspended animation. And we actually see the moment in flashback when that happens.”

But the intense experience that occurs over less than two days with his father forces Jonathan, who also befriends a terminally ill 17-year-old girl at the hospital, to undergo a delayed coming-of-age, as the walls he has built around himself come crumbling down.

Robert also prompts Jonathan to reconnect with his Jewish roots, as the dying man insists on holding a seder, even though Passover is a week away. Levitas said he used the Passover celebration to represent multiple religions. “It wasn’t so much about it being Jewish, although that was incredibly important to me as an individual; it was meant to be more of a universal stand-in for religion.  And that’s why they’re doing a seder, but they’re doing it in a chapel, doing it basically in a church, and they’re doing it below a stained-glass window of ‘The Last Supper.’ It was really playing off that thing because, ultimately, we’re all the same.  We’re all going to the same place.”  

As “a Jew from New York City,” Levitas said, certain values were instilled in him and are expressed in his film, including a reverence for life, as well as an understanding and appreciation of progeny, of generations.

“Jonathan’s character, at first, doesn’t necessarily appreciate his place in the line of life, of generations,” he said. “I think that, culturally, there is something in this community, and Robert absolutely subscribes to this, and it is that he will live on through his son, and his son will live on through his son, and so on and so forth. There is a continuation of the same life that is expressed in different ways. And one of the reasons Robert is not scared of death is that he knows that he’s not really going anywhere. Many cultures certainly do this, but I think in Judaism there’s a particular understanding, because of the history, of this continuation of life.”

“Lullaby” opens June 13. 


A different take on the last chapter of life is expressed in the documentary “Next Year Jerusalem,” which follows eight residents of the Jewish Home for the Elderly in Connecticut — all in their 80s and 90s and most with some form of disability — as they go on a pilgrimage to Israel. We see them on the plane and traveling by bus throughout the country, visiting key sites, such as the Western Wall, and even floating in the Dead Sea.  

Helen Downs, age 91, floats in the Dead Sea, in “Next Year Jerusalem.” Photo courtesy of First Run Features

Filmmaker David Gaynes said his father, who was the ophthalmologist for the home, encouraged him to volunteer at the facility.

In 2002, Gaynes made a short film about five of the residents and their thoughts on mortality. That led to his being commissioned to make “Jerusalem.”

Gaynes said he is particularly interested in exploring the choice that we have at any point to live our lives deeply and richly. “I think that exploring the lives of people who are elderly provides an incredible opportunity for that kind of reflection, because you’re working with people who are at the end of their lives.  And I loved interviewing people who are in their senior years, because there’s so little pretense to their point of view, and they really spell things out bluntly at that age.  So, to make a film that was a metaphor for choosing life at the end of life, I felt that this was a great subject to dive into and explore.” 

Gaynes, who is Jewish, said he also wanted to explore Israel, to make aliyah, in a sense, but realized when he got home that he had spent most of his time filming others and really hadn’t had much time to connect with his Judaism on the trip.  Soon, however, his outlook changed, and he felt he had been part of something sacred.

“In fact, it was how I want to live my Judaism in the deepest possible sense, which was that documenting and observing the magic that these people experienced was a holy thing and a sacred responsibility, really. 

“My theology as a Jew is basically one thing, and that’s tikkun olam. And so, if I could present a thesis in this film that was of use to other people, that honored the people who were in the film, and that did justice to what happened in Israel that was truly holy, that was my Jewish experience in Israel. That was my aliyah, and that was my connection.”

“Next Year Jerusalem” opens May 30.


There will also be a slew of biopics this summer.  One of them, “Supermensch: The Legend of Shep Gordon,” marks the directorial debut of actor Mike Myers.  The film chronicles the varied career of a Hollywood talent manager. 

Shep Gordon in “Supermensch: The Legend of Shep Gordon.” Photo courtesy of Radius TWC

After graduating college in New York, Shep Gordon moved to Los Angeles and the famous Hollywood Landmark Hotel, where he hung out with Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin. At one point, Hendrix asked Gordon if he was Jewish, and when Gordon said he was, Hendrix told him he should be a manager. When asked in a recent interview if he took offense at the ethnic stereotype, Gordon replied, “It didn’t feel like it came out of any negative stereotyping. It was, in fact, really true. At every studio, there was a Jewish guy; every agent was basically Jewish. It was a reality.”  

Gordon followed Hendrix’s advice and soon launched the career of Alice Cooper, who remains one of his closest friends. The fledgling manager established Alive Enterprises and, over the years, has guided such disparate performers as Anne Murray, Ben Vereen, Raquel Welch, Groucho Marx, Teddy Pendergrass, Frankie Valli and The Four Seasons, The Pointer Sisters and numerous others. In the mid-1970s, he took his company into motion picture production. 

Gordon is also known for having created the concept of the celebrity chef. He said that venture started in the mid-1980s, when client Kenny Loggins was appearing at a Nissan convention in Hawaii where Wolfgang Puck did the dinner.

“Kenny Loggins got a lot of money for doing that show,” Gordon recalled.  “Wolfgang Puck got nothing but a couple of airplane tickets. There were 50 people waiting to get an autograph from Kenny — there were 300 waiting to get an autograph from Wolfgang.

“When I was looking for a way to help the chefs, it was obvious to me they were gigantic celebrities, but no one had ever monetized them or called them celebrities.”

Among the chefs Gordon has managed, in addition to Puck, are Roger Vergé, Alice Waters, Charlie Trotter, Nobu Matsuhisa and Emeril Lagasse. 

Gordon added that cooking was a large part of his family’s life as he was growing up, and he learned to make Jewish dishes from his grandmother. He feels that his Jewish roots have been a big influence in his life.

“I was brought up in a culturally observant, but not religious home. We did belong to a temple. I was bar mitzvahed, but I learned my bar mitzvah [prayers] phonetically. I still to this day go to the High Holy Days [services].  I’m a member of the congregation in Maui. We all got together and bought a house, and got a rabbi, and got one of the Torahs out of England that were reconstituted, the German ones. We have a wonderful rabbi and a really nice community, and a Hebrew school. It’s really nice.”

He continued, “When I meet a Jew, I feel like I’ve met part of my family. The exhilaration of having Jewish food is remarkable. I took Alice Cooper, who’s a devout Christian, to Kutsher’s in New York for Passover seder. But it also makes me feel so good to make a matzah ball. I sort of channel my grandmother.  

“I have a family in Israel. I feel like I have a place on the planet as a part of a larger community.”

“Supermensch: The Legend of Shep Gordon” opens June 6.


Music and musicians also figure prominently in the documentary “The Pleasures of Being Out of Step,” about noted jazz critic Nat Hentoff, who was also a political journalist focused on issues surrounding the U.S. Constitution and civil liberties. 

Nat Hentoff and clarinetist Edmond Hall at the Savoy Club, Boston, November 1948, in “The Pleasures of Being Out of Step.” Photo by Bob Parent, courtesy of First Run Features

Hentoff wrote for the Village Voice and other alternative papers, as well as The New York Times, The New Yorker, The Washington Post, Playboy and a host of other publications.  He also authored several books of fiction and nonfiction. 

The film is permeated with the sound of such jazz greats as Duke Ellington, Billie Holiday, John Coltrane, Miles Davis and Charles Mingus, to name just a few.  In the movie, Hentoff talks of jazz as the epitome of free expression, and his affinity for the musical genre dovetailed with his interest in the Bill of Rights.  

The jazz world was largely populated by African-American talents, and Hentoff became a staunch civil rights advocate. He caused some controversy in the late 1970s, when, even though he is Jewish, he defended the First Amendment right of Nazis to march in the Chicago suburb of Skokie, which had a large Jewish population, including numerous Holocaust survivors.

But he began to seriously alienate his progressive friends because of his perceived disinterest in the feminist and gay rights movements. When Hentoff came out against abortion rights, many of his closest cohorts broke with him irrevocably, and some of them explain their feelings in the film. However, Hentoff has not wavered.

“The Pleasures of Being Out of Step” opens July 4.


Another champion of civil liberties, although in a different context, and of civil disobedience, was computer genius Aaron Swartz.  His complex, tragic story is told in the documentary “The Internet’s Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz.” Swartz, who had been a child prodigy, became an activist bent on providing free Internet access to public domain documents, such as court records and scientific journals, for which distributors charged a fee.  

Aaron Swartz in “The Internet’s Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz.”

While a research fellow at Harvard, Swartz downloaded a huge number of articles from the academic database JSTOR.  When the university and JSTOR tried to block his access, Swartz connected his laptop to the network in a closet that was off limits and continued to download the data. Eventually, the Secret Service arrested Swartz, charging him with breaking and entering for the purpose of committing a felony. His initial indictment specified four felonies: computer fraud, wire fraud, recklessly damaging a computer and theft of information from a computer.

Ultimately, the Department  of Justice took over the case and charged Swartz with 13 counts under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986, which carried a potential penalty of up to 50 years in prison and a $1 million fine.

On Jan. 11, 2013, Swartz hanged himself in his Brooklyn apartment.  He was 26.

Filmmaker Brian Knappenberger, who details the Justice Department’s aggressive campaign against Swartz, is quoted in the production notes as saying, “Aaron’s story reached far beyond the Internet communities in which he was a celebrity. It also struck a chord with people who were outraged about government overreach, both technological and in our criminal justice system.”

“The Internet’s Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz” opens June 27.


Burt Shavitz, the face on the label of Burt’s Bees products, a line of natural beauty and health care items, is also an unconventional figure. Shavitz is profiled in “Burt’s Buzz,” by filmmaker Jody Shapiro, and says of himself at the beginning of the documentary, “My life has been evolutionary, not revolutionary.  Things just took one day at a time, and everything worked out.”

Burt Shavitz in “Burt’s Buzz.”

Shavitz, born in Manhattan, went from college into the Army and then became a successful photojournalist and a regular contributor to Life and Time magazines. He photographed street scenes, protest demonstrations, the March on Washington, and such figures as Malcolm X and President John F. Kennedy.  

After meeting a beekeeper in the Hudson River Valley who became his mentor, Shavitz eventually moved to a farm in Maine and took up beekeeping himself.  He lived a spartan life in a wood-frame dwelling with no electricity or hot water and sold honey by the roadside.

Then he began a relationship with Roxanne Quimby, a struggling single mother, and the two started making candles and other products out of beeswax.  The venture succeeded, and they moved the enterprise to North Carolina. Their partnership ended when she pressured him to sell his interest in the company to her. Quimby ultimately sold the company to Clorox for $300 million.

Although Shavitz never saw any profit from the sale, he got a contract with the new company to become the spokesperson for the line, and Shapiro filmed him on a tour in Taiwan being welcomed by reporters and adoring customers.

Now retired, Shavitz still lives simply on his land in Maine.  He harbors no bitterness and insists he enjoys being close to nature and has everything he needs.

“Burt’s Buzz” opens June 6.


Combining a biopic with an exposé, director Joe Berlinger, who is Jewish, tells the story of Irish mobster James “Whitey” Bulger, who ran South Boston’s Winter Hill Gang for more than two decades, in the documentary “Whitey: United States of America v. James J. Bulger.”

Mugshot of James “Whitey” Bulger at Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary. From the film “Whitey: United States of America v. James J. Bulger.” Photo courtesy of Magnolia Pictures

After 16 years on the run, Bulger was finally arrested in Santa Monica in 2013  and was tried in federal court on charges that included murder, racketeering, extortion and drug dealing.

In addition to interviews with federal prosecutors, law enforcement officials, victims and victims’ families, the director includes footage of former Bulger associates who testify for the prosecution, as well as taped conversations between Bulger and his lawyers.

But the proceedings became mired in controversy when Bulger denied the FBI’s claims that he was an informant whose help was valuable enough to allow him to continue his illegal activities. Any exploration of the opposing positions was excluded from the trial proceedings. 

In the film’s press notes, Berlinger asks why, if Bulger was an informant, he was allowed to kill instead of being prosecuted, and, if he wasn’t, what kind of corruption the FBI was hiding. “The defense maintains that the story of his being an informant is a cover for the true story,” Berlinger says, “that Bulger was protected because of a personal pledge to protect a federal prosecutor from retaliation (and thus he was allowed to kill and extort countless victims); that Bulger paid off numerous corrupt FBI agents in exchange for information that gave him a competitive edge; that the Department of Justice knew about this behavior and quarantined the damage by making FBI Special Agent John Connolly the scapegoat.”

The director explains that the FBI may have made up tips and attributed them to Bulger in order to justify search warrants and wiretaps that helped convict members of the Italian mob in New England. “The Department of Justice does not want to undo those convictions, sully its reputation and admit civil liability to the many families whose loved ones got caught in the crossfire of our government’s decision to let killers operate with impunity in service of its national war on La Cosa Nostra.” 

As the film makes clear, in Bulger’s world it was acceptable to be a murderer, but to be a “rat” was to sink to the lowest possible depths. Berlinger doesn’t take sides on the conflicting allegations, but writes, “They deserve a fuller inquiry, as we must understand the price that society pays when the government gets into bed with murderers — not just by letting criminals kill with impunity but also by giving deals to murderers to walk the streets in exchange for testimony that may or may not be truthful.”

Whitey: United States of America v. James J. Bulger” opens June 27.


We move from American criminals and their reign of terror to Jewish political terrorists with the highly praised Israeli movie “Policeman.” The film focuses on Yaron (Yiftach Klein), leader of an elite team that belongs to the Israeli Defense Ministry’s anti-terrorism unit. Yaron is a loving, attentive husband and expectant father who treats his team members as brothers and displays deep concern for a member of his unit who is seriously ill.

But he is also a warrior. As his story unfolds, a second storyline depicts a band of self-proclaimed revolutionaries, young Jews who plan a violent action in protest over economic disparities in their country. When the protesters carry out their plan, Yaron and his team are called to the rescue.

Although filmmaker Nadav Lapid doesn’t endorse the terrorist activity in his movie, he said he wanted to depict on screen the class struggle that exists but is masked in modern Israeli society.

“In the ’60s and ’70s,” he said, “when political terrorism rose in Western Europe, Israel was socialist, basically egalitarian. Today, Israel has one of the widest economic gaps in the Western world. An extremely narrow group of wealthy families owns national industries, which were privatized; the unions are weak and pale; [there is] a harsh capitalism, masked under the fake myth of Israeli solidarity and brotherhood.

 “This concept of the struggle from within, of class conflict, is repressed by the deeper Israeli taboo — the fundamental Jewish cohesion against the external enemy forever determined to destroy us,” Lapid said. “This idea that we are all Jews, members of one big family, always in [a] situation of alertness due to the permanent existential menace, defines us as a state and defines our values.  Under this myth, fake but very efficient, [a] few Jews exploited the majority of Jews and non-Jews over the years, preventing them from the basic human right, to hate [and to struggle against] the person who oppresses you, because we are all Jews, all brothers.”

“Policeman” opens June 13.


ALSO NOTEWORTHY:

“Venus in Fur,” Roman Polanski’s latest effort, is about a writer-director who finds that an unlikely actress turns out to be perfect for the part of a dominatrix.  But, as he auditions her, his power wanes, while her power grows. Opens July 4.

“Magic in the Moonlight,” Woody Allen’s upcoming film. Little is known about this movie except that it takes place on the Riviera during the 1920s. Opens July 25.

“Korengal,” the follow-up to “Restrepo,” which depicted what battle is like for servicemen deployed at a dangerous outpost in Afghanistan. After the death of  filmmaker Tim Hetherington, his colleague, Sebastian Junger, used the same soldiers and crew to complete their vision, explaining in the press notes, “This film tries to help soldiers understand their own experience in combat, rather than communicate that experience to a civilian population.”  Opens June 13.

“The Kill Team,” another war documentary concerned with Afghanistan and a soldier’s dilemma over reporting atrocities committed by his comrades and risking their revenge or remaining silent and staying safe, but taking the chance of being implicated in their crimes. Opens Aug. 8.

“The Last Sentence,” a Swedish film about the real-life editor of a leading Swedish newspaper, who openly excoriated the Nazis and his own country’s tolerance toward Hitler. Opens June 20.

“Obvious Child,” a comedy about a young comedian who takes a life-changing step on Valentine’s Day after being dumped by her boyfriend and finding a new man who gets her pregnant. Opens June 6.

“Wish I Was Here,” directed by and starring Zach Braff, as a struggling actor who home-schools his two children and learns important lessons about himself in the process. Opens July 18. l

Life’s last chapter, biopics and Jewish terrorists Read More »

e-cigarettes can kill our children!

There is a new emerging health threat to our children: Nicotine poisoning.

The number of nicotine exposures in children reported to the National Poison Data System has more than tripled in the last year.

Here’s the fact every parent should know: 1 tablespoon of nicotine oil can be lethal to a 60lb child!

When doctors were campaigning against tobacco companies through public health legislation, we did not foresee a resultant new market for smokeless nicotine products. Electronic or e-cigarettes apply a heat source to liquid nicotine, causing it to vaporize, known as “vapes.” Because e-cigarettes burn nothing, they release no smoke. These devices were meant to be used as a bridge to smoking and nicotine cessation. However, many have traded one addiction for another. According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to date, at least 1 in 5 smokers has tried e-cigarettes, as have 10 percent of U.S. high school students.

The market for e-cigarettes is unregulated, ushering in a new generation of products to those who might not have otherwise tried tobacco. As of the spring of 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration only regulates therapeutic nicotine products. Unfortunately, there's no regulation of the recreational nicotine market, such as Nicorette® gum or Nicotrol® inhalers.

Electronic cigarettes deliver a cocktail of toxic chemicals including carcinogens into the lungs. The use of e-cigarettes can make bacterial infections resistant to antibiotics. Glantz et. al. reported in Circulation (5-13-14) that vapers caused significantly higher risk than scientists initially speculated. E-cigarettes deliver high levels of nanoparticles, which trigger inflammation and have been linked to asthma, stroke, heart disease, and diabetes (SN: 7/18/09, p. 26).

Worse yet, there's no child-protective packaging on any of these products! To the contrary, manufacturers are placing child friendly, attractive, cartoon-like labels on products. They add sweet smelling oils or seductive colors together with fruit-like flavors. There is no quality control, no guarantee the consumer is getting what is stated. Because the highly concentrated nicotine solutions used are orders of magnitude higher than traditional, a 15-mL vial, or 1 tablespoon can be lethal to a 60lb child.

Nicotine is a plant based parasympathomimetic alkaloid, an agonist of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. At low doses, it stimulates the reticular activating system as well as dopamine release, giving the sensation of excitement and happiness. At higher doses, it causes high blood pressure, higher heart rate and can induce a heart attack. In toxic ranges, nicotine causes seizures, central nervous system and cardiovascular collapse, and death.

Please share this information with all educators, parents, nurses, and doctors alike. We need legislation to protect our children. We need responsible reconsideration of commercial sales of these substances. 

Liquid concentrated nicotine can easily be the most deadly substance in your house!

e-cigarettes can kill our children! Read More »

Sterling agrees to Clippers sale, will drop NBA lawsuit

Donald Sterling, the embattled owner of the Los Angeles Clippers, has agreed to sell the team for $2 billion and will drop his lawsuit against the National Basketball Association, his lawyer, Maxwell Blecher, said on Wednesday.

Sterling, 80, has been banned for life and fined $2.5 million by the NBA for racist remarks he made in a taped recording that were leaked to the media in April. Most of the players in the NBA are black.

His estranged wife, Shelly Sterling, last week agreed to sell the franchise to former Microsoft Corp chief executive Steve Ballmer for an NBA record price of $2 billion.

Sterling sued the NBA and league commissioner Adam Silver last week for at least $1 billion in damages, alleging the NBA forced him to sell the franchise based on a recording illegal under California law.

The lawsuit was filed at the same time as the NBA tentatively agreed to the Clippers sale and announced that Shelly Sterling agreed that neither she nor the trust that owns the team would sue the league.

By dropping his lawsuit and any opposition to the sale, Sterling, who had owned the Clippers for 33 years, brings a close to a crisis that brought shame on the league, caused sponsors to drop the team and led players to consider a boycott.

Reporting by Eric Kelsey; Editing by Sandra Maler

Sterling agrees to Clippers sale, will drop NBA lawsuit Read More »

Time to rethink our “never again” promise…

“Never again means NEVER AGAIN” – in the past couple of months, I encountered this sentence online more times than I can count. It is usually associated with Israel’s National Holocaust Remembrance Day. We were taught this sentence every year since first grade, when our teacher explained how it is up to us to keep history from repeating itself by remembering and reminding others the horrors of the Holocaust.


This sentence resurfaces every year during that day, on my friends’ Facebook walls. I also post it and share it, and we’re all dedicated to living up to this promise. Unfortunately, as this powerful sentence spreads across the web and penetrates people’s hearts, a new realization sinks in: the promise to prevent those horrors from repeating slowly crumbles. It is happening again.


Throughout the years, researchers tried to find an answer to the question: “Does history repeat itself?” Some believe it does, some believe it doesn’t, some believe only certain aspects are doomed to repeat themselves over and over again until the end of time. One of those aspects is war, which happened before and will happen again as long as the two things people are willing to kill for – nationalism and religion – continue to exist.


About 80 years ago, people in Germany were frustrated. The loss of WWI came with a high cost, and many were stripped of their assets and their pride.  People were looking for someone to blame, and a small political party came up with an answer. Hitler’s National Socialist German Workers Party blamed all of Germany’s problems on the Jews and the people followed. Some were just happy to hear that their problems are not their fault, others took action and joined the Nazi party’s efforts in “migrating the problem.” The seeds of hatred sawed by Hitler grew to become the Holocaust, which we later swore to “never let happen again.”


Now, decades later, the path to destruction is being built again. As we promise “never again,” more than 18,000 “>“Jews vs. Nazis” beer-pong, a man enters the Brussels Jewish Museum and “>makes the reverse Nazi salute (Quenelle) popular, a Jewish teacher is “>neo-Nazi parties take over parliaments in Europe. Hungary's third largest party is the neo-Nazi Jobbik. Greece’s Golden Dawn is also a growing power, and recently it even entered the European Parliament for the first time.


As political parties driven by hate take over Europe, who is going to stop people from committing hate-crimes? The times are different, the people are different, but nationalism is the same. We still proudly announce “never again” after every report of a hate-crime against members of the Jewish community, but the time has come for us to ask: can we keep that promise?

You are welcome to follow Israelife on “>Twitter, comment on the posts and recieve updates on the day-to-day life in Israel.

Time to rethink our “never again” promise… Read More »

Judith Prays’ ‘Bracelet Project’

How often do you think about the Ten Commandments?

I’m not talking about a gray-bearded Charlton Heston on Mount Sinai, gripping two stone tablets under a lightning-filled sky.

I mean the instructions you were taught as a child: to worship only God, to keep the Sabbath and to avoid doing things that most would agree are pretty bad: murder, idolatry, blasphemy, adultery, dishonesty and theft.

Even the most secular try to abide by these principles. They’re seen as universal edicts for decent behavior. All of which might make the Ten Commandments seem a little, well, quaint.

Artist Judith Prays began thinking about the commandments in 2011 out of frustration with how hard it was for her to make decisions.

“I started to research decision making, and I saw something that said that if you have a strong value system, it’s easier to make decisions,” Prays said. “I’d never thought about value systems before, and [then] I came across the Ten Commandments.”

She wanted to make the commandments more immediate in her life, so she handmade bracelets for herself — 10 simple copper bands, each with one commandment stamped on it. 

“You see bracelets in a lot of different cultures — rave culture, ‘What Would Jesus Do?’ — as a medium. They’re very social, and they constantly remind you of them, and they bring them into conversation a lot, so I was able to share the commandments,” she said.

Prays wore two or three bracelets at a time, and then started giving them to people who she felt needed them. One Shabbat evening, she encountered a woman standing outside a boutique, waiting for a man inside. 

“She asked me about them, and I started reading them to her — ‘Don’t covet,’ ‘Don’t commit adultery’ — and her eyes got really big at ‘Don’t commit adultery.’ And it became clear that the guy she was with was a married man. She was freaking out, and I was, like, ‘You should probably take this.’ And she put it on, very hesitantly, and it was like she was taking on the commandment. You could see that change happening,” Prays said.

Prays eventually gave all her copper bands away, but that encounter sparked the idea for what’s become the Bracelet Project. She commissioned 10 artists to each make a bracelet based on one of the commandments. Then, 10 writers were each given a bracelet and  wrote an essay based on his or her experience wearing it.

Prays has made a habit of organizing large-scale, hyper-interactive art projects. In 2010, she threw a “pheromone party” in New York, a matchmaking event based on smell, and soon after, similar events cropped up around the world. The Long Beach native, now 27, became more religiously observant around that time. She now lives an Orthodox Jewish life with her husband, Yonatan Mallinger, a filmmaker and jewelry maker, in the Pico-Robertson neighborhood of Los Angeles.

Mallinger made a bracelet based on the commandment “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.” It responds to the religious edict that, on Shabbat, carrying a key is considered work, and therefore religious Jews carry their keys on chains around their neck or their waist.

“The irony of the thing, fashion-wise, is that Shabbos is when you dress up. You know, you wear your nicest clothes, and everyone’s wearing this nice outfit with this janky key contraption,” Prays said. Mallinger’s bracelet fits its house key snugly into a clasp, a far more fashionable choice.

Prays assigned the essays to various writers she knew, but for the commandment against murder, she wanted someone with a personal experience. For that one, she commissioned an essay from a prison inmate in Lancaster who is serving time for murder. 

“I also wrote a letter to Bernie Madoff, to see if he would write for ‘don’t steal,’ but he hasn’t gotten back to me yet,” she said, laughing.

Prays’ sister, Alice Kurs, a prosecutor in the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office, wrote about the commandment against bearing false witness. Prays enlisted mixed-media artist Ashira Siegel to create the bracelet for that commandment. 

“As a child, I definitely lied in very creative ways to get out of trouble,” Siegel said. Her bracelet is made with wire loosely wrapped in plaster, then wrapped again in black thread and coated in resin. The visible disconnect between the materials is designed to reveal the “breaks in communication” caused by lying, Siegel said.

Kyle Fitzpatrick, creator of the blog Los Angeles I’m Yours, wrote an essay in response to the commandment “Thou shalt not steal.” He decided to interpret stealing in the form of “stealing attention” because of his over-the-top fashion sensibility. His assigned bracelet was a pair of golden handcuffs. But he found that they attracted less notice than he anticipated. “I think that’s the nature of being a person who dresses a little more flamboyantly,” he said. “People aren’t fazed by things like that, and I was very surprised.” 

Writer and director Joey Curtis, who co-wrote the screenplay for “Blue Valentine,” which starred Ryan Gosling and Michelle Williams, wrote about the first commandment: “Thou shalt not have any gods before me.”

“You can relate that to anything you put before God,” Curtis said. “In our culture, it’s really easy to prioritize other things, like work, before our spiritual practice.”

To celebrate the launch of the Bracelet Project, Prays wanted to emphasize the wisdom and light of the commandments. “I wanted to do it in a place where the Ten Commandments are not being followed, where it’s spiritually dark,” she said.

She discovered Lincoln Heights Jail, a vacant 1930s jail building in Los Angeles that is long-rumored to be haunted. The event on June 8 will feature light installations (inspired by the recent James Turrell retrospective at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, live music and interactive experiments that invite conversations around the Ten Commandments. 

One of those will be a “mug-shot photo booth,” that will take photos that will be projected around the space. Another will be a “spiritual interrogation room,” where participants will be asked probing questions about their value systems.

Prays said she hopes the bracelets, essays and other extensions of the project help people think of the Ten Commandments as not just a Bible lesson, but also as a guide to living a more righteous life.

 

The Bracelet Project’s launch party will be held on June 8 from 4 to 7 p.m. at the Lincoln Heights Jail in Los Angeles. The event is by invitation only — to request an invite, email rsvp@thebraceletproject.com.

Judith Prays’ ‘Bracelet Project’ Read More »

Judaism in the time of climate change

When human life is in danger, Jews stop and pay attention. In fact, we set aside Shabbat and virtually every other law not only when human life is clearly and certainly in danger, but also whenever there is a reasonable possibility that life is threatened. According to Mishnah Ta’anit, the Sages declared a day of communal fasting and prayer when only a tiny amount of wheat in Ashkelon had been ruined by shidafon, a dry, destructive wind, and another when two wolves — capable of killing children — were merely spotted in an inhabited area. When a real possibility of danger to life lurks, we don’t avert our eyes. As a matter of spiritual course, we take notice and consider how to respond. This is the way we live.  

We’re at an interesting and challenging juncture right now in humanity’s journey on Earth. There’s at least a reasonable possibility, and many respected voices insist that it is more than just that, that in the coming years and decades, we will be dealing with a natural world that is less accommodating and more hostile to human life than the one we’ve come to know. We will experience bigger and more destructive storms, longer and deeper droughts, and more frequent wildfires. Insects and fungi will spread to places where they didn’t previously appear, threatening crops. These are reasonable enough possibilities that normative Jewish law and thought indicate that we are obliged to pay attention to them — and to their possible consequences. 

Accordingly, simply as a regular Jew doing what regular Jews do, I recently began the process of trying to place these possibilities into a religious framework, into a framework of appropriate spiritual response. Here are three ideas, drawn from our classical sources, that I believe serve to create this framework, both for today and, more important, for tomorrow and beyond. 

1. Solidarity: In Genesis 41, Yosef accurately interprets Pharaoh’s dream about the upcoming years of plenty and years of famine, and then finds himself charged with the awesome responsibility of storing food during the good years so that it can be eaten in the bad ones. In the middle of that story, the Torah reports that “two sons were born to Yosef, before the years of famine came.” The Talmud asks: Why did the Torah specifically point out that the sons were born during the years of plenty? From Yosef’s behavior, the Talmud concludes, we learn that it is prohibited to engage in marital intimacy during years of famine. There is a limitation on pleasure-taking during times of suffering.  

This conclusion is codified into Jewish law with only with slight modifications. Nonetheless, the medieval Tosafists challenged the Talmud’s analysis, pointing out that Yocheved, the daughter of Levi, was born just as Jacob and family were entering Egypt. Clearly, she must have been conceived during the years of famine! Many have offered answers to this question, but among the most compelling comes from a 19th-century thinker, Rabbi Baruch HaLevi Epstein. For Levi, a refugee fleeing famine in Canaan, there would have been no reason to refrain from marital relations, Epstein explains. The Talmud’s teaching is specifically about people like Yosef, who due to their own personal social or economic circumstances, are not personally affected by the famine. The Talmud is teaching us to vicariously experience other’s people’s suffering, and to consciously cultivate a sense of solidarity with people whose lives have been turned upside down by nature’s unfortunate surprises. Out of this solidarity, the Talmud hopes, we will develop the will and the strength to make political and economic decisions that respond to the challenges experienced by others.

2. Priority: To illustrate just how highly Jews prioritize human life over all other considerations, consider this halachic decision made by Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Spektor in the spring of 1868. In the midst of drought that had dramatically affected numerous crops, peas and beans were among the few foods readily available, especially to the poor.Rabbi Spektor decided that the custom forbidding kitniyot (legumes) would be lifted for Pesach of that year. While this may sound like a no-brainer, we know rabbis face pressures around decisions such as these. Would he be accused of overstepping his authority? Was he setting a dangerous precedent for the waiving of other time-honored customs? Was such a move especially perilous at a time when Jews in other parts of Europe were abandoning Jewish practices? Rabbi Spektor might have decided differently based upon any of these considerations. But he did not, because human life and welfare had to be given higher priority than any of the political or historical considerations that in other circumstances might militate against taking action. In times of trouble, human life must the highest priority. 

3. Prayer: On the morning after he petitioned God to spare Sodom and Gomorrah, the Torah records that Avraham returned to the spot overlooking the cities and saw nothing but smoke. The feared destruction had occurred. The Talmud asserts that Avraham prayed at that moment. We can’t help but wonder, though, what kind of prayer he would have said at that point. I think it was a prayer similar to the one that we ourselves say each morning. “Place in our hearts the ability to understand and discern.” Teach me, God, what I should be doing differently. What changes do I need to make in the way I conduct my own life, in the way that my household and my society conduct their lives, so that next time the outcome will be different, so that destruction can be averted? “You, who shine light upon the earth and its inhabitants with compassion.” You, God, are a benevolent God, who created out of love, and who does not desire the death of Your creatures. Standing in Your presence, we do not despair. We continue to look forward, for we know we stand before God who desires life.   

No one knows for certain what lies ahead. But, as religious people, we prepare ourselves for the possibility of danger to human life, through readying our eyes and hearts to see and feel, our arms to reach and respond, and our souls to seek Divine wisdom through prayer. We know before whom we stand. And we know what He expects of us when we live in challenging times.


Yosef Kanefsky is rabbi of B’nai David-Judea Congregation and president of the International Rabbinic Fellowship (IRF). A regular contributor to the Journal, he blogs at Judaism in the time of climate change Read More »